Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.210 S Mill St.HPC38-942 40 5 41 ll a-- - co' se : 11 YU -/0 i I 21U b. M111 HY C . i M - u /1 r--. r- 1 ' f j 7 -* CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 11/03/94 CASE NUMBER: HPC38-94 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-43-004 PROJECT NAME: Footloose and Fancy Things Minor Historic Dev. Project Address: 210 South Mill APPLICANT: Steve Deqouveia 925-9155 Applicant Address: 210 South MIll REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Address/Phone: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: r ./ Y - 4, MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 210 S. Mill, Minor Date: November 9, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for the installation of awnings over the shop windows at "Footloose and Fancy Things." The awnings are to match the ones that already exist on the building, except that they will be collapsible, which is currently required in the Code. This building is not historic, but it lies within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: "Footloose and Fancy Things," represented by Steve DeGouveia. LOCATION: 210 S. Mill Street, Unit A-201. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The proposed awnings are located in a courtyard and will match awnings which already exist on the building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Awnings are common along the Hyman Avenue mall. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This proposal has no impact on the cultural value of any adjacent historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal has no impact on the architectural integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: To whom it may concern, I would like to place an awning above the windows ofmy store that are south facing, and above the common patio ofthe Tom Thumb building, which is located on the corner ofHyman and Mill Street's. I propose to use the exact same style, shape, color, and material as already exists on awnings on many of the other shops in this same building, thus giving a more finished look to the whole structure. The only difference in the awnings that I am proposing is that they will constructed in such a way, that they will be easy to collapse against the building in case of a fire. The addition ofthis awning will, I feel, greatly enhance the visual appearance ofthe building when viewed, both from Mill St. and from Hyman Ave. I already have a bid from a company who can complete the project before the ski season, providing I am able to get approval from the city in time. I would greatly appreciate a speedy review and approval. Sincerely, Steve DeGouveia - l - --- 1 , •14 - 4 . . 'UP- - .... -- . k I . . ... -- + f , . 9 41 . .. t. . I a., . I : . v· * . *B.. - ,-., 1047 t=·,-3..71¥'i.,~j 12 t.. -A. 99 - . a I . I 1.- I I . i. . 1 , . , . . I. -. . I-J**'37.- I , I - t ..1.-, ...f ~44 .2...g, J. 1 ' - li ... . I. . ...t-:IJF 1 , I . 1 .* . 1 ... . ' -«. 1, r. -A-,~ •-•*A 4- .-,---=Il--li-- :. - . · · I I, . I . - ic· 4 . 1 - . •r · . 1- 4 1 - . .A ''I ,. · C I ·0 *i ·' ~- -~- ..It - 4 44 -I, I./.-- ./** ... . 18 . -.-2-4 -. -IL -- 6.:I ..$ .... . r ·-/. / 1 . .... - . .-- . " 4/' -AG...4,"L : -<-p=,;*r=:T. . t € 7, . 1 - . .·rt' $1 - - 1 -**--7 -. ' ' r · i i a 4 1 .. .1 - , -- - = 1~93:'77. - ~tr=*L '- .. . . I , . , .. I .9 , 1 .Ii I +- *. V 41 P . :2£911 77 * b ,, 1 - i .C.=..4--4-5 6 6 9,4 ./. . . , I. , - 2- M 4.-2.- 71. .... 8 r--** . --- - --- ..t P -- I 1-1~~ ~~ ~ 7 i·GE'; 42/ :1 , ... 2. Z_. 3, . 4, lk . -1 - . k -9 -1 k -1 ; · - 4• <~ • ·-T-··-.-111 · I , ,. ..,.. , , 4 I - - r + rz 1,1 F.12= 24. 1.5-, r.:· ALL: » -lt '·f 0 -- 4. ' 4 I , 1 . .. I . , c_..1 : . - 14 -f:74 lit - :1. -'1 -2- -t--7 4.;~2-- . -3 /v n. Ht ' + '4 -- - - ./ . I jl r -- I *-2-7 P:73*11: ,/. 4 -1 ti ! t -11 . 6-.-.1 I 1, 4 12!1 --Il- 41 1 4, A -I -.4 -, - ... 7.-1 . .-Il'.I , 0 r ' .--1 1 7.- . . . A 2-: 37-31-127-2 '.4.2. i-* 31-SEEE##5*~~tj~~~*e, . . h , .. .1 1 ... h , 4 :. . ,•-- j Ck - .4 - - - ....4. --, - .. an. 1 -2,2 =UL- ...122,2..,.:r,-€,A...f-= .1 . . . . - * ... J , .t J.. '. .· .4 $.. 1 . 5. ... ..B'I..I , I I I . I $ . I. 0 - -4. £ 4.- -, 1, 4/ .* *.. .- . t.1 .... . L $ .... , .... ... 4. ..4 00 f.9 , 2 -t.=1'*2=:-=t r + . ./ I. -I -./.r .. -Il - ... 4.-I - . I .- -I ..+I - --Il- ... 4-1 ./ I. ·r .2- IF,1, . . 43 - ,\i- TV> . ' 9/ L i J L .. . .2 ?brret - ·D .. -- -6.76 1.1//b#Z- 21~32 3--2.-~..t'r- ~ 47>fl , . r , .4 - - .4 2/J . V. r - 1 . 4 -- - 4 - ./ 6 --/ u,~a, . ' · : 42 - - . .. , ~ ~ . .. 711 . .. ....4 - I. 395 , , . vie 1--Li & 6 ii : £41 42it'. 1' .Br , . · , , -7 . 11 1.4 - . 4. . - I- I.-- I 4 .... - ..... . fi' 0 - -- - 45 . j. L ©T ,, - 1. /3.9 4 / 'ty- 24:*., 97.11 .4 : 4- . L:R·:,1 . 759'r[--t . f /95 1 . a 14:1 ' - I . 0 .. ... . .4 - . - , f~ . -1 '.-u.a- 2-1 , It , P . 4 , h 2-1 - 1. 72.13- ree c. --- ..... U -. L.=7.:22 . 2.3 ..4 , : , 5 4!, i~ 2 -17- ..1 -1 - ..4 -. 4.- --. --.. ...,~-I ... / . 1;11- 0.14 4 , f . ir ¢ .* . -- ........0-1 , .1 I 4 - ...i.L'.'. 1, , ; 9. I / 4 -4. - 44 *'p 1 J. - +.t .f it- B .... b Fl- -1, 4--· I , - . 6- . lit, 41*2.16.4, -1 1,4.- . *A--.-& --. ic . 1, 14;:4 : #[1.--I - J '', - .,,-v-* 0-*4.1- .-- -- 4 4 -4 ... l TE . 1 4#4 4 . - ..---)*. ~ --.1 14 0 1. r. ' ' it -· *iL./. .7. ,- I - 'rn.. 1. th.441 0 1. ' i-- -_I. JUT 3 , · - - , , . ..4 . -- . -ED . mizf k - -/- ~*0 . -- .1 8. , -, ..14 11 .0 , 4 -- ' 3 1; Iil - 1 , 9 P. - LL .---- -r- -- - -./. - I --- ./. . . I -4 i, . 1 0'6 2 e # . - 1 i .· - , A. 1-t I ' 1 . ... 1 b. r 1 . i 7 J k. 7 4 1 - rr r . ATEACEE,ENT 1 I . _AND USE* APPIICATION KE 1) Project Neate 2) 'emtedc Irnejsm Ll A.,- /7- R - 1 0 1 -7-0 421 7--+/ lit AA E E LJ /«3. 21 0 5:. AA I LL S 7- (indicate street address, lot & block Ininber, legal description,here awrerriate) 3) Present Zoning 4) Int Size 5) nplic+Ant's Name, Mdress & BM]ne # »C> 0 7-6- 0 6>52 + /2/57/2~"2 7- 76/f/c«5 2. go 9.0 /;01/ 6- 2 5 1- 61 Ilegresertztive's leze, Mdress 6 2*,re # 5 7-25 c., 31 ~3~k <cs&> c.j 6, a r ,« 7) Fpd of kolimtign (please check all that apply): Oonditional Use - Conoeptual SPA ,-' 00,~Ttnal Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD .-' k ~ Minor Historic Dev. Historic Demoliticn Stream mrgin - · - Final ]JUD - Historic Desigration mlint.in Vi•w Pl Ane Subdivisicn - - Text/M® Amendment . - GUS Allobzt Iot SpliwIat line - (2433 E,oemption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses · (r,Eber and - type of existing structures; apNoodmate sq. ft.; umber of bedrocms; ary previas approvals granted to the property). 9) Description of Developnent Application 10) Have you attadied the following? Response to Attadinient 2, Minin,m Slinission Ocntents Besponse to Attachment 3, Specific Sulnission Oontents Response to Attadmerrt 4, Review Standards for Your Applicatian li.11111 .. MINOR HISTORIC DEVEISPMENT Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of'Review Standards for Your Application 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to. the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the. Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover ~1/j- ( ~#_ (~C /3 L L E x~ 4 -2 6 - 9 c 6-5 Steve DeGouveia i . ady. - . £ 6 --- ..1 1.14.13//5. 1 . 1 . 1911 1 11 . 0 - Ui W I . 9 B"/1 -- -~1 4 C ,~,1, \ '\\\./.\.. \ . 6.\: .- , IAT"ppl.I , I. , r I.- 444\ 1, -- U i¥,(/L -» GWOrT /5 ¢77 7* 4527CrM 1/ c $.w.t-- v.r € 7.66 ,¢ ri &,4- 0- ¥- 45 0 f Cl>6 - 1>•-C >-0- b'r <97 f L.G- 64rwf <Lpf<L€k c.th,06rL 44,6 C 12. Vt tfY-• 4-- *-6 e al /+75<772< R-6.- 1©r l- el dE- /6 '7 p ..aill L€ 1 , - I l=.I i . ./.,4 .1 u 2 LL' .'h 11 1 , 21. / 8 111 fl,1,11.all . U»3»L- &~917- 2 (50* Lot + <4- Klcy X7 H V CE Vt- t'Frt- 7,6#re e /5 71 *-4 f n,77 15,72 € ard T='59-9-7-c. A 7934- ' j 4 22::00**81 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-9155 2/ 0 9./4/4-2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 9, 1994 520 E. DURANT AVE. - CHANEL - MINOR Amy: This is a Chanel jewelry store as opposed to the boutique that we reviewed previously and they are proposing to make similar changes to the door and window. They are not lowering the window ceil. I recommended approval as submitted. Brand Allen Architects: The window is opaque and is 288 sqft. MOTION: Les made the motion to approve the minor development application submitted at 520 E. Durant Ave.;second by Roger. All in favor, motion-carries. 210 S. MILL STREET - FOOTLOOSE AND FANCY THINGS Amy: There are awnings on the building and these will match the existing except they will be collapsible. I recommended *approval but the awnings are going to be at the second floor level and there aren't any on the basement level. It is not an historic building and it is inside the courtyard. Les: It might even make it interesting. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC approve the minor development application as submitted to 210 S. Mill; second by Les. All i favor, motion carries. 939 E. COOPER Amy: The committee was generally in favor of the site plan and asked for some restudy of the treatment along the sides , the setbacks because we have an historic resource on one side and neighbors on the other side that were concerned about loosing their light and air. There was a request for restudy of the new buildings B and D and those are provided tonight but Staff has not reviewed them. The board thought that the houses could be contemporary and playful and did not have to try and replicate the historic house next door. Bob & Darnell Langley, owners: We have a project that we feel is in absolute harmony with the best intent of the Aspen Area Community Plan and the Neighborhood Guidelines. We have been working with the HPC for 1 1/2 years. Les touched at the last meeting that the process has worked. We have come to point .that we need conceptual approval and we have done everything to accommodate the concerns of the HPC generally. I'm the developer and I will be living there. Recommendations at the last meeting were to remove the gingerbread and we have done that. The Villager li