The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.234 W Francis St.HPC40-970 -tay. H 80% N 2-0 1 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO A GARAGE AND BREEZEWAY, AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED AT 234 WEST FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1998 WHEREAS, the applicants, Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects, have requested significant development approval to demolish and reconstruct an existing garage, to add a breezeway, and receive variances for the property located at 234 W. Francis Street. The property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adj acent parcels when the subject site is in a il, Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Julie Ann Woods, in her staff reports dated May 13, May 25, and June 10, 1998, recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meetings of May 13, May 25, and June 10, 1998, the Historic Preservation Commission considered and approved the application by a vote of 5-2 with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That significant development approval to demolish and reconstruct an existing garage, to add a breezeway, and receive variances for the property located at 234 W. Francis Street as represented to the HPC on May 13, May 25, and June 10, 1998, be approved with the following conditions: 1. The garage will be constructed with the materials indicated and location set forth on the drawings submitted, dated Received, May 29, 1998 in the Community Development Department. 2. The proposed garage shall be granted the following variances: The rear yard setback shall be established at 2', thereby granting an 8' variance; the sideyard setback along 2nd Ave. shall be 0', thereby granting a 12' 4" variance. 3. All conditions ofthe Oct. 8,1997, December 10,1997, and January 28,1998 approvals must be met. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions o approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. 5. All elements removed shall be restored and replaced from the same area from which they were moved. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1998. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, TEMPORARY RELOCATION, AND APPEAL OF "RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS" FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED AT 234 WEST FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 1, SERIES OF 1998 WHEREAS, the applicants, Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects, have requested minor development, partial demolition, temporary relocation, and appeal of"Residential Design Standards" approval for the property located at 234 W. Francis Street. The property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, all applications for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(C) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel; and 2.Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a.Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. b.Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, all applications for temporary relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the following Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(D),(3), and (4) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 3.Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation; and 4.Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff reports dated October 8, 1997, December 10, 1997, and January 28, 1998, recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meetings of October 8,1997, December 10, 1997, and January 28, 1998, the Historic Preservation Commission considered and approved the applications with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development, partial demolition, temporary relocation, and appeal of "Residential Design Standards" for the property at 234 W. Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado, as represented to the HPC on October 8,1997, December 10, 1997, and January 28, 1998, be approved as follows, and with the following conditions: Historic house: 1. A new double hung window which matches the existing windows may be added on the east wall of the historic house. 2. Two lightwells are approved on the east side of the historic house; none on the west side. 3. A skylight may be installed on the east side of the roof of the historic house. 4. An octagonal addition for a kitchen may be made on the northeast corner of the historic house. The windows in the new kitchen addition will be as presented to HPC on January 28, 1998. A skylight may be set into the peak of the kitchen roof. The roofing and siding are to match the historic house. 5. The existing dormer on the north side of the house may be altered, however the applicant must revise the proposal for the dormer so that the north wall of the dormer aligns with the building wall below, for approval by staff and monitor. New siding and roofing materials are to match existing. 6. The existing roof on the one story lean-to addition at the back of the historic house may be altered, provided that the applicant produces more research into the original slope of the roof, for approval by staff and monitor. Any alterations to the entry porch on the west side of the addition that are needed must be submitted for approval by staff and monitor. 7.. The breezeway connector between the historic house and garage may be removed. 8. The applicant will salvage the original stone from the foundation of the house and reuse it or, if this is not possible, use matching stone to recreate the foundation to match the original condition. 9. No exterior materials on any part of the historic structures (house and "carriage house") may be removed without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8,1998. 10. No changes are approved for any windows on the historic house. Ifthe applicant wishes to add exterior screens or storm windows in the future, they must be reviewed and approved by HPC. 11. The wood shingled roof may be replaced to match the existing roof. Garage: 12. The non-historic structure located on the alley may be converted into a garage, including new doors on the alley, new dormers with double hung windows on the north and south sides of the building, removal of doors and replacement of windows on the west and south, and an addition for a staircase on the east side of the garage. Carriage house: 13. The applicant is to restudy the proposal to modify entry porches on the south and west of the carriage house and east side of the historic house, so that the porches have a flat or slightly pitched roof, for approval by staff and monitor. 14. A closet addition is approved for the north side of the carriage house. The pair of double hung windows in this location may be shifted to the west. A vent may be added on the west side of the closet addition. 15. The trellis on the west side of the carriage house may be removed. Temporary relocation: 16. A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond in the amount of $30,000 is to be provided prior to building permit to ensure the safe relocation of the building back onto the new foundation. 17. The applicant must provide a site plan showing how and where the building will be stored during the temporary relocation. Construction fencing or other barricades must be placed around the historic house to protect it during the temporary relocation. 18. A report from a licensed engineer or housemover must be submitted prior to relocation showing how the structure will be braced and protected to withstand moving. 19. All window sash in the historic house will be removed and stored safely during construction, so that there is no damage to them. All window and door openings into the house will be covered with plywood until the house is set onto the new foundation and the original window sash re-installed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the Â£2 filay 1 of '~67 1998. V HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman / V ATTEST: Chief Depu@ Clerk TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Amy Margerum, City Manager Stan Clauson, Community Develonment flirector,00~~~~~~0 FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Directo [Acting Historic Preservation Offi DATE: June 5, 1998 SUBJECT: 234 W. Francis St. --garage pending demolition In an effort to further substantiate the age of the existing garage-like building at 234 W. Francis, I reviewed old photographs at the Aspen Historical Society, reviewed the chain of title and the National Register nomination forms, and took a walk through the structure. Based on the information highlighted below, it is staffs belief that the garage- like structure pending demolition is not historic, does not contribute to the historic resource, and could be demolished without detriment to the property or community. At the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on May 27,1998 Joan Lane testified that she "worked for Herbert and Joella Bayer at their home, office, studio, corner 2nd/Francis from 1951-1954 as secretary. My office was in the small room between the house and garage. There was a garage during the entire period I worked there." (Written testimony attached as Exhibit A). It is possible that Ms. Lane's dates may be slightly off, as the Bayers sold to R.O. Anderson in 1953. In addition, there may have been a "garage" of some sort built some time after 1948 and before the "apartments" were built by Anderson in 1956. But what staff believes is clear from the record is that the building which is present today, is in essence, a 1950's structure with several remodelings. The following information leads me to believe that the garage-like structure that we see today was most likely constructed sometime between 1956 and 1959 with some additional remodeling in 1970: 1. The 1904 Sanborn Fire maps do not show a garage in this location (see Exhibit B). 2. Herbert and Joella Bayer purchased the house on January 13,1948. They subsequently sold the house to R.O. Anderson on October 14,1953 (see Exhibit C, chain of title from the historic inventory). 3. A photograph dated 1948 (Aspen Historical Museum) taken from Red Mountain shows that a garage did not exist behind the house at that time. 4. A photograph taken sometime after the Bayer's purchased the house (1948) indicates the existence of a garage, apparently attached to the house at the rear. The photo shows the trademark Bayer fence which remains (though temporarily stored) today (see Exhibit D). 5. An earlier photo taken from the same vantage point shows no garage visible, but clearly a shed-like addition to the main house (see Exhibit E). An addition of some sort is also indicated at this location on the 1904 Sanborn map. Based on the immaturity of the landscaping, the photo could have been taken in the 1930's. Noted is the presence of two interior chimneys which do not show up in the post-Bayer photo. 6. The National Register Inventory Sheet was completed by Barbara Norgren, one of the state's foremost historical experts. In the form she notes that "At the rear of the house on the alley is a two story, wood frame and clapboard house with a broad gable roof constructed in 1956*." The asterisk indicates "This building is non-contributing." (See Exhibit F). 7. The building permit file for this property includes a building permit dated April 23, 1956, issued to "Anderson" (see Exhibit G). It is for residential apartments, 2 story, 14' x 22' frame with wood shingles. The estimated cost of construction was $7500, which was a substantial sum in those days. This is smaller than the existing building. 8. Another building permit was issued on June 11,1959 for a one story addition, 15'2" x 13 1/2'. Permit indicates it is an addition to an existing structure (see Exhibit H). 9. Another permit was issued November 3, 1970 to "remodel garage into living quarters, add bath". It was valued at $2000 (see Exhibit I). At this point I have been unsuccessful in tracking down either R.O. Anderson or Joella Bayer to discuss their memory of this building. I f anyone knows how I might be able to reach either o f them, please let me know as I believe this may be the last alternative resource for exactly determining the history of the structure. I hope that this more clearly indicates why the Historic Preservation Commission has approved the demolition of this structure. As indicated in my previous memo, the City Council has until Wednesday, June 10th to decide if they want to call this action up by serving written notice on the HPC and the applicant. Otherwise, the demolition permit can be issued. Please let me know if you have any other questions. g \plan!,ilig\,spei,\cases\hpc\partialdemo\214cc.doc EKH, Blf A 1 - 1-1 - r Le : 4-to-1.1- (Â·4--rd-34 ra= 0 P)10 6.1,~~ i,-CE-4 (f?Ncticottr 1 -72 D - 13 L A . , / CLA. 14- 1 rry-:1.Â· O 4.i L 1 . 4 i h -1 K,r# 4 r 9 2.,â‚¬ 770-4-2 j --4<.4.i r.2.4 04, r 0Â·r-~-a-- 1 ari / Ena,4,1.0 <.6 2Â¢-te--DIA. lis l- 19 99 0-4 - V, 4 22<' h 0 7[7:l /\,~ , ticÂ·1 49 -C -0 U,>,9,7 07,4-1/An /kl,8 Â·(..Cu~ re-~914,1. 039ile jui'~~~Â» l,i,Â»1,/U--- ri''uuÂ°~ t~clÂ«car Q . 1 4. 94 2... (A r a /3 c: r. art--A r â‚¬ ~ M.'-7.4./Ac~ -tho 9-404- 2 ~nf/\,0<) r0 -I- L 4 27*Rg rO Â·tit,i n. 4,30./IA- L LEA 11 er- 77 -Â«. cok-2 11-2 1 L -1 1 3 2 Â£4 O-4 - 1 1- Z I -- 0 N 97-- P C \ 2.4 %1 41 . ts l~ 0 - -.1-1 E-g L In - 1 6 m-,12 11 1S* *5 321 323 329 215 2/7 227 2 ./ ST. ==hr=e 04157*= == -- / 3/4 316 , -1. 1 ;4 11 , a> 0 'i- 3 , 3.22k '' ,.- - . 87# 1 1 1 1 1 r-1 & rE--.# tb --1- t N ..5 r= -1 1- . - i 01 72 Â·a --10 . . liE s 10 1- 30 k Â» 10 . t h k DO k k X 71 4 r.>to * L -1 73 1 A 1 1 1 1* -0 1 1-- # 1 ik 4 9 &,~ 0 I b 1 j Ob ~~3><C~ 4 4 6 11.Z~ 0 1 + \ I r \ =====t=== === ====== ======== = = == = W=.=FRAN=GES= =- = =="=, t. Â® 6/0-511 6(2 620 622 626 630 62 370 ~ 376 ~ 522 5-26 - 91 1 . - - 1 ~Â¤---E _..zr- r---t 2 + 1-2 _El- V 4 -ZIEk- , /* *17 'Ff C.,0,;Ng ,<1 2/ ,- -4-219 ' 1Â· ..1 miI *: K Â· 3 -1 .1 +4 r., .0,+03/ .V'.1 + -- '9- " -rrw 11* 1 i A .- 1 1,4 N 4+ 0 -1 --- 4 4, 30 'b k r* X 0 '34'11-Y,AMIâ€ž 9601- 4 12 13 't , ' 4---71 - 79 [-1 2<4 - 2,<3 -FT/Tr 24 . f 1 -1 4 -2 - 1 * out#04' : 1- N -1 L-k4Â£:= A A j=1 11 L J 1 0 11=1 14 - 12 16 3/'9Â©1 0,- - \ 2 9.1 1 4 6 8 C.0 4 01 -h 4 '123 0 Z 1-1. C hâ€¢ 121 R ---7------- t-- 113 11 -- 86 z i w 1-: Hui 43(* - *Â§1 , 1 11.1=J 1 3 7.15 'til -1 -- b. 3. t--=Â·J ~ 1....1.1 ~ * 603 609 6/3 629 G33 637 523 511 525 SMUGGLER (626) 600 610 616 620 624 518 520 320 4 --- - - 01; 4% - 1. - 1-11 A '8& - ts ; A -1 1 . %9 Â·rir-9 + 9 - W=f-7:2 /1, w -1 $ tj \/ *-35 4 r T Â°-1 - P lei 6 -11 - 0 1 0 1: 0 1 10 1 0 Â»1 CD 2 0 h . 40 * Ab=3 k h X L_-1 1 n- 1 1 44 X . '1.. 1 1 1 - 6 !11 -1 -1 k b 11* Â·-- 1 -3*1 Ff . El 13~ 10 0 1% 1,- C ul IL 1 b Ch * 4 01.0 4 10 77.-9 1 142 Ch 9 6 N 9 - I -- ~,i * 4 4 0-- 4, N e 0,2 -17; (lizi~.-~p, 8* 005 0 ga~ Extte 8 tr G ASPEN HISTORIC SITES/STRUCTURES INVENTORY 1980 48 l Icl-- 2.34 \Al. FRAk,) C-iâ‚¬ 6+. BLOCK/LOT(s) ADDRESS INSTRUMENT/DATE GRANTOR GRANTEE YEAR/TAX ASSESSMENT COH-k) 6 . 1.-A (2_Lt L.5 3Â»61 L ~3\~ 443 -TAR,J 0* *6PE:O SAÂ£-Â¥ w i c.0-Bew GOP 5120 leS SAeÂ»+ \A (Acae-j Bli > R -rzaeejrlâ‚¬) (ROP \042-1 )449 ~91%22 FrreaEEALP JAAJE E. 0212&- ~Ql*~Â»:P 41)9 09 Â·~Eâ‚¬EAS. E.-T. GeAY . . 7804 â‚¬Een et,he 1 9 te BCOL EoÂ·19 De. 3029 C/dia 0.U,)Ak Â« C-TY. -forin,es . (*12 5*141 E.T. GRAN PRACE- 9 49 -re \10* 9- \\R ~44 -Fâ‚¬ A.10 \c_ A.COAA-rE Do erÂ·r*Y KocH 5 *Aul Pr> i lis~ 4% '34Â·014 St-Au) %2Yz-r> SAHEE 1-\-eesserh (_A-Â·Kt p --IMPÂ¥20\1â‚¬ WD \13\ wtÂ» joeu* c GAN Se foberto. A.rdersch - 1 290 - AA â‚¬1>. \ A OE E.G2ANE I go[ i - 495 *56-0 U 11 188 3 - 350 55-0 i 36? 3- 39/ EU h -= RESOURCES: 1. Pitkin County Abstract of Lots Books Grantor/Grantee Books Grantee/Grantor Books 27 Pitkin County Tax Assessment Rolls (on microfilm) RESEARCHER: ~fiEA 6. 14 eLpA-re- L o.t_ Ar-l-)C) ' 82:3 CONCLUSIONS: "4 'im# ' h .......4 0,.; 307, ;2.1.....: tiEK j ' R '' '6 â€¢,Â· i fili - - - 1. 1 .1 . , . f? 1'' 1 1 11 , 41 Wi,f 11,1 1 1 1. 1 1. 1}/2 , 1 1,1-r--T 2 'f . Â·. . li L â€ž 411/'. 1 1 11 - , d :c I ..4-t,ar ,,fili' .=111 F.~I- 0.91 >I-' -4~11]j '1.- i . .illIL?,t,t~ .... h.1 11 - - .1I d. t kil :,1 - . 3 13&# vat 7 1 , - ,= 4.,1. C . 1 , 1 l j twiti,=â€¢â€¢32 '92/ /1. 5. 1. 1, - :1>..4 :Â· 'f. 1 'I: ' 1~ 1 1 . ..r 14 1 A. . i..:**6~.Â·-77. ' H I ...Diallilliwiliallillilt,Lm../ .-' l'*.AArt.,7 . i ..W * - 1 EE** f : 1 =52â‚¬41 1%42< :'' *211 . : 4,~,0 =lill 2~ ..7.4.t 1 ' %1* r. , . / i< 104'66'.~---- /1-0 , , ::,--,ji/*-4MM#P+. ... . ., A * , 1. 4, -r. 2*44 -9, . 4-~tzy Z. al* . 1 / , i, 4 f i V: . . 4, Â· % .... il./....... .... I . 0 . 4 0 ./jur#*dz= 44 ...4 3 .. .- I - 4 -1 1*,6 . lit (P,N.;'../ -/ - "' - I 7 , Al . v -lcm N jt,44.16 Â£ 7 Jr --, .9. .1 . 4 - . .. 4 1, - : I , 4 '4 . 4, I - W. 145 4 1, 1 illâ€ž 7 . ., , , 4 N -i. i Â¢1*im - #* 5. 9. (Â·.i di , Â·.66 ...t. * â€¢,1 , 1 . - lk., ., / I pl~~ti'' F 4 6.1 . *â€¢" ./ W 1 ... 'r . 'p 1 Â· 4 '' ./.1. . 2â‚¬ t:rote~-/il'&7 . 4-9,/ 1 . ''' 444194kâ€¢i'- jill<73Â·i f . . 7 , Â¥ -tr... e,Jt, 2, " i'' ,04, '1, A 1,0 *. 045#zi . 1,1, i. P. t .J f. '. f .? 8 , I O. u.'I - ., ...= I r '. 1 . 4, I ' .Â· ATÂ· 2 'C 4â€¢40 6, , r . â€ž /4 9,. Â·Â·Â·Â·.Â·~ - .. H . 14 b... n 4. 1.44 , 1 J. 6/3 a t. f~*, t.4 1 2 . 4,4: .. 54 ..% Â£3Â· . . 2*. 14 5 ji<. f.t.,0, , .5 .?* -,1 1 47 7'Â·Â·Â· .0 <Pvt. 7 f.' IN 4 4 .Â· I # Â£ ... . . . -7. 1 0 - ., ,.. , I ' 0 ' . 1 . Ahst) , 9 ,,4 ...1 ir i.. - Un.- . 1 4 ., ...4 . ,~ 4 3 B It K /2, A 3 /4 (%7 Â·PS Form 10-9.>3 OME ... 2224-0019 156 5-821 Expires iD-31-87 United States Department of the Interior EkI+IBLT- F National Park Service For NPS use only Aational Register of Historic Places received 1nventory-Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms ype all entries-complete applicable sections 1. Name 7 StoriC Davis Waite House (Historic Resources of Aspen - MRA) ind or common The Davis Waite House 2. Location street & number 234 Nest Francis Street n/a not for publication city, town Aspen n/a - vicinity of state 1 0 V - code ng county Pitkin code 097 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use r'l/Edi strict 9/ Ehublic X occupied n/a agriculture n/a mu seum -Xbuilding(s) 1-- private IMA- unoccupied a221. commercial n-~ park -21 structure IM-1 both rl/a work in progress nia educational -_ private residence 2/a site Public Acquisition Accessible Illa entertainment 8/2 religious nia object ntain process Ill@ yes: restricted nla government n/a scientific Fl/1 being considered Illi yes: unrestricted Ill& industrial Illa transportation X multiple resource X-nO n/a military 13/a other: 4. Owner of Property name R. 0. Anderson street & number p . 0. Box 1000 city, town Roswell - vicinity of n/a state NM 88201 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Pitkin County Court House street & number 506 East Main Street Aspen state Co - city, town 6. Representation in Existing Surveys " Colorado Inventory of n/a .itle Historic Sites has this property been determined eligible? - yes X_ no date Ongoing n /8- federal _.1 state n-1-c- county n-,-a- local depository for survey records -Colorado Historical Society - OAHP .te. Colorado 4 0 ,. Description Condition Check one Check one .Ill.a excellent B/adeteriorated Illa unaltered 21- original site ~-afg~~d n/a ruins X altered n/a moved date Illaunexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The 1888 Davis Waite House is a large two story dwelling with a rectangular plan, hipped roof and a front gable ell. Sited on a corner, the house is constructed of wood frame faced in clapboard. There are several mature cottonwoods along Ehe side street and in fron -c. There is a low wooden picket fence around the street sides of the four lots. To the east of the house is a small, one story build- ing with a gable roof and faced with clapboard which is said to be one of the early log cabins under the clapooard exterior, which was probablv put on in the 1890s. (photo #8, Ba, Bb).The building is contriburing. The Waite House is a vernacular Queen Anne design with little ornament except in the gable, which is faced wizh fish scale shingles and has bargeboards. The front porch, on the west side of the ell, is small and projects out from the front of the house. There is a one story enclosed vestibule with a Ila-5 roof behind the porch, which may be a later addition with the porch rebuilt in the front. The porch roof is also flat supported by heavy turned posts with decorazive brackets at the top. The windows are one-over-one, double hung wood sash and for the most parts are tall and narrow single windows or in pairs. The first floor window in the front and the one on -che west side are double the width,GE.the.skifie-winuews. - At theÂ· rear of the 1Muse on the alley is a two story, wood frame 7 and clapboard house with a broad gable roof constructed in 1956.* In 1959, a one story gable roof-addition was put onto the rear of the house connecting it with the 1956 building. (photo #8a) All of the buildings are painted a dark red color with white trim and black accents. The Waite House is a designated local landmark. * This building is non-contributing. Pal 8. Significance Period Areas of Significance-Check and justify below n/a prehistoric Ill-5. archeology-prehistoric f~1/*ommunity olanning DZ@ landscape architecture Fl/a religion nia_ 1400-1499 r.za archeology-historic r~1,(1 conservation 0/La law n/a science O.1/3 1500-1599 T,/a agriculture :*'a economics nia literature Ill~ sculpture I-1/2 1600-1699 1. architecture *a education 3/2 military ata social/ n,/a 1700-1799 n/3_ art 7-1Â£.a engineering . Dia music humanitarian _X_ 1800-1899 rÂ¢a commerce n,/a exploration settlement 1% philosophy. n/a theater R14 1900_ n, a communications n,Za industry -1 politics/government ~ transportation niA invention n/* other (specify) Specific dates 1888 Builder/Architect Not known Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The Waite House is signizi=an= =cr its association with Davis H. ,'12=Ze, an Aspen attorney and newspaper publisher who was elected governor of Colorado in 1893. Waite lived here before and after his stormy two vear term as =overnor, until his death in 1900. It is the resicence most associated with Waite in the state. The snall building just east of the Waite House is important in Aspen's architectural development. Originally a pioneer log cabin, it was later covered with clapboards as the town developed beyond a mere mining camp. The Waite House - itself is an exanple of the larze, olain vernacular dwellings typica. or the late -1 1880s and .earlv 1890s that were Julia or local materials. It is one of zhe best preserved houses of this type in Aspen. BACKGROUND Davis Hanson Waite, born in Janestown, New York on April 9, 1825, came to Leadville, Colorado in 1879 where he practiced law before moving to Aspen in 1881. Waite was elected Justice of the Peace in 1881 and was also appointed the first superintendent of schools in Aspen. 1 In 1882, Waite and his son started the Ashcroft Journal in the naming carrp of Ashcroft. Waite bought the Aspen Tirres in 1883, but sold it to B. Clark Wheeler, who later becarre Waite's son-in-law. Waite and Wheeler also established a law practice together.2 In 1885, Waite married Mrs. Celia O. Malty of Sanquoit, New Fork, a second marriage for both. Waite, a labor sympathizer and Populist, advocated free silver and other radical reforms. He founded the Aspen Union Era in 189 1, a weekly newspaper. In 1892, the Populist Party nominated Davis Waite for Governor of Colorado and he was inaugurated on January 10, 1893. When Waite took office, the price of silver was declining and the business climate was economically unsound. By July, the situation was bleak as the economy crashed in Colorado with the derronitorization of silver. Waite spoke to a large crcwd assembled to discuss the deteriorating conditions. In his speech Waite earned the nickname, "Bloody Bridles Waite" from a phrase taken out o f context: " It is infinitely better that blood. should flow to our horses' bridles rather than our national liberties should be destroyed. " , It was during Governor Waite' s term that the bill for women' s sufferage in Colorado was enacted into law, making Colorado the second state in the union to do so. For the most part, however, Governor Waite's term was stormy, narked by - labor and political unrest, unemployment and economic depression. The miners strike at Cripple Creek which was settled in 1894, gave a victory to the new union, the Western Federation of Miners, and proved a political set back to Waite and the Populist Party. The "City Hall War " in March 1894, added further miseries to Waite's term. When he tried to dismiss two members of the Denver Fire and Police Board, they barricaded themselves in the Denver City Hall and refused to leave. Waite called out the armed militia and Federal troops to surround City Hall. Thousands of Denver citizens turned out to watch the action--which never materialized as Waite decided to-let the courts decide the matter. 3 P l I . . NPS Form leÂ·900Â·8 OMB No. -024 . 00159 flÂ·82) Expires .0-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination Form Continuation sheet Significance-Waite House Item number 8 Page 2 Davis Waite' s bid for re-election was unsuccessful and he returned to Aspen where he died of a heart attack in November 1900 while helping his wife prepare Thanksgiving dinne~- Mrs. Waite died in 1937 and both are buried at Red Butte Cemetery in Aspen. In the late 1940s the house was the home of Gerbert Bayer, noted artist and industrial designer, who care to Aspen in 1946 to work with Walter Paepcke. Ln 1953, the house was owned by R. 0. Anderson, who is still the owner. Anderson served as the chairman of the board of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Footnotes 1. Robert F. Bartlett, "Aspen: The Mining Co=unity", 1950 Brand Book (Denver: The Westerners, Vol. VI, 1950), p. 144-145. Aspen Times, April 8, 1882, p. 2. 2. Andrew P. Buesch and Mannel Hahnn, "Aspen over the Divide-Its Past and Present", The Westemers Brand Book. (Chicago: Vol. VIII, May 1951), p. 19. Aspen Times, May 19, 1883, n.p.; January 12, 1884, p. 1. Len Shoemaker, Pioneers of. the Roaring Fork (Denver: Sage Books , 19 75) p. 77. 3. Lety R. Hafen, editor, Colorado and Its People (New Your: Lewis Historical Publishing Co., 1948), Vol. I, p.-465-. Carl Ubbelohde, Maxine Benson, Duane A. Smith, A Colorado History (Boulder: Pruett Publishing Co., 19721, pp. 224-225; 228-232. 4. Aspen Times, January 14, 1937, n.p. Shoemaker, p. 77. *.. 9. Major Bibliographical References -160 See zootnotes 10. Geographical Data under one Acreage of nominated property (luadrangle name Asnen Quadrangle scale 1:24 000 UT M References A Ill 31 1314!2~5I2!0~ ~413~319~6Il,0~ BIlli 1 1 ~111111111 1-1 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing c Ll_,1 |11 L I ''1 11 Il ''1 0|9111'11*JI'lilli~ F1i~|~ !| :i~~111~1!~ H~ !~<|i,1 LI~~I~lÂ£ 11~ Verbal boundary description and justification Block 48, lots K, L, M Aspen Townsite List all states and counties for properties overlapping state or county boundaries state n/a code county code state code county code 1 1. Fofm_ PL~par& By f V nameititle/~ Barbara Norgren, ennqi 11 tant date organizat~on n/a Auglist 1 5 r 1986 street & njq'ber 7453 East Jefferson Drive telephone (303) 740-7860 city or town < Denver .4 state _CO 80237 . A 1 2. Statâ‚¬-FffsiBriâ‚¬*re Grviii:on Officerte-FIiÂ¥ication The evaluated significance of this property within the state is: __ national -- state - local As the designated State Historic Preservation OMicer for the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89- 665), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by the National Park Service. State Historic Preservation OMicer signature date title Â· For NPS use only I hereby certify that this property Is included In the National Register date Keeper of the National Flpgister date Attest: , 5 - â€ž #*:030:j.- lili EXHIB~ ft 0 BUILDING PERMIT City of Aspen. 0-Jrado CLIL 090 ESTIMATED COST $ -3--520._31- i DA'19. A /.-..1../ //77~- â‚¬.91 /D n 4- PERMISSION IS HEREBY GR ANTED AS:, ~-3---J. Aj TO ' 1 e.. 4.-~-~ A / STOR.V 0%5.J t./.1 / '* ON LOT_- -al Ory. ~ ~ , ADDITION 71 ,-677-' A , I ZONE , - b FIRE DIST._25:2131___... OCCUPANCY--________---_-___Â·__-_--__--____ ADDRESS 394 W 70 .- ---4 T'YPE OF CONSTRTITTON Â»~92 . -- STZE )5' S " w x )33-- NUMBER LIVING TTNTTR / NO. ROOMS STYLE OF ROOF 4.4 -1 2.-- RarIFTNG MATERTAT, Alie, Â£.2 /*W â‚¬22- ~1~2 U A RCHTTECT -2 4'~~ , ADDRESS ADDRESS 64Â«J CA. CONTR A CTOR /0 i , 4 - -2_.t., 1 1 REMARKS: V 1 A A A A M *10-JJ (\. i V tÂ»Â·J~-9-#- - a f 1 1 City Clerk /1 \\ Additional parriculars anu rettial n.23. c.11 awvv c ua'a- 13 â€¢â€¢AutÂ·'F-IN-'6#' w#up--*'v -- -~---'-- -~--- --- --- -- - tion contemplated.) 64Â£31-c 'c:~ Â«> C - -Or 4/ I.U.--e l.--LL. Z ...r--- (over) I 4 Estimated Cost $-_. __- Date Filed ! .tÂ»n,JU / 1.-4, Building Fee $ .-.. -.. -------- 1 4 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PerMission is hereby requested to perform and do the work, repairs construction alteration or development described as follows: - Location by Street No. and Lot and Block No. - r-(1' . t. 4 L f Ol 9'.â‚¬ < 3 5, -3 L U /Lt.>..~U.0 Zoning Classification: 12-6 Name and address of owner %4.3- . 67,41, . 41 ,; Name and address of contractor, architect or builder ; 1 1 -4.X ' n - . 04 \, (0., p U77 - 5- it.4. Estimated Cost W 3 -3 9. Type Construction Â¥' /' b ,-vÂ·v- JL L. 191-qvtd...f EL-01<400 Intended use and purpose -4- Number living units No. Rooms 1 4 .- 1 ,/ / Height Width /5 1 Length Feet 17 g A 4 Li â‚¬ 42 Distance from lot lines N- 7 - ; s- 7 6 ; E- , ;W-Iy : Distance from finished grade to bottom of footings Size of footings R X $ c Thickness of Foundation Walls u Thickness of 1st story walls Thickness of 2nd story walls Curb-cut (Width and location) Alley bond: Style and pitch of roof .- LE- a-0 9-) 4- Joists, floor supports and rafters: (Give size, distance apart, and materials:) First Floor A Â¥ 87 /6 0(: 7U--9 \ 2- Second Floor - Rafters 51-VO / 4 0 giL, Floor supports ' = 4/-_~ A, -4 AA-2 0-k-AA--1--â€¢R---- 1 - Roof Material GO 4 /]- / 1 4 - â€¢J Additional particulars and remarks: (If above data is inapplicable, describe in detail here the work or construe- tion contemplated.) ,- Y fcze i C L 276 CL 64~-,CT-&* -5/CZE-0.-~ r (over) 0 f This application is made with the specific understanding that it is subject to subpension or revocation for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the Uniform Build.ng Code, the City Zoning Ordinance and all other ordinances governing construction, etc., within the City of Aspen and upon any other conditions (if any) upon which it is approved, or for unauthorized deviation from the terms of the application or laws of Colorado. Applicant hereby warrants that he is authorized to make this application and agrees that the same shall be binding upon the owner, the applicant, their agents, heirs and assigns. All documents attached hereto are incorporated by reference and made a part hereof. Applicant agrees to notify the Building Inspector at least 24 hours in advance for inspection of footings, founda- tion, frame, lath, and roof: such inspections to be approved in writing before proceeding further. The Building Inspector, or his agent or representative, is authorized to inspect the premises. Dated and signed this ---_-__--___--__---___day of 19-_--_ ' c r i. < (Applicant) CapacityÂ· U.Uk 1.2 4'' F -Â·O 4-3--â‚¬d 1--5.5. c.-47 C-< <- v 1 -CAP, Owder, 6ntractor, etc.) BUILDING PERMIT The above and foregoing application for a Building Permit is hereby approved, subject to compliance with the following conditions: /. Flu,14-- Â»-Te- IN .4.2/4-76/& $(- C.-=Ls: A Dated this ___-_--- 113&---- p#cd A.-,u - 19_471'- i , 411 4 -/-2/, D ~ Building Inspector. BUILDING PERMIT REJECTED The above and foregoing application for a Building Dermit is hereby denied and rejected for the following reasons: Dated this day of 19---- Building Inspector. '5~ 2 81 BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT E,41+1 8 ir Â·L E CIT ' ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKINE OLORADO ' ADDRESS GENERAL OF JOB CONSTRUCTION 99% W %24%=<O PERMIT ~ WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT TH IS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. CLASS OF WORK: NEW Z ADDITIONC* ALTERATION ~ REPAIR Z MOVE 3 WRECK U OWNER -/,1Lcuu-2 A Â£ 41 Â· 9 31.0 1 N AME ff C , dll-- k.c.u~_,6.Â«n ADDRESS 1 -->cÂ« / 03-0 PHONE LICENSE LICENSE NAME (AS LICENSED) /,42 8-,glty CLASS g- NUMBER .:44 6 3 INSURANC ADDRESS %1,1 -L - 4 PHONE L SUPERVISOR ' , FOR THIS JOB NAME DATE CERTIFIE[ LEGAL , - DESCRIPTION LOT NO. /0- k BLOCK NO. 10 ADDITION SURVEY ATTACHED = DESIGN A iic. BY BY PE No. AREA (S.F.) HEIGHT NO. TOTAL~ OCCUPANCY - AT GRADE (FEET) STORIES UNITS 2' GROUP ~ DIV. BASEMENT FIN. E GARAGE SINGLE 7 A-TACHED 7 TOTAL TYPE FIRE = UNAN. U DOUBLE i : DETACMED C] ROOMS CONSTR. ~~ w k~ ZONE a 2 DEPTH -- SPACING AUTHORIZED BELOW FIRST 3 -= SPAN AGENCY DATE GRADE FLOOR BY M BUILDING ~ EXTERIOR i REVIEW 1 FOOTING ~ CEIL:NG SIZE O ZONING EXTERIOR CONC. E r-' FDN. WALL ROOF PARKING THICKNESS MAS'Y E k.. tr; THICK rn CAISSONS m ROOFING : PUBLIC HEALTH SLAB LJ & GR. BEAMS L-1 MATERIAL MASONRY ABOVE ABOVE A8OVE ENGINEERING EXTERIOR THICKNESS IST FLR 2ND FLR. 3RD FLR. WALL STUD SIZE ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE & SPACE IST FLR. 2ND FLR 3RD FLR. .1 REMARKS2~~,1.-~#--Â£5Â£d' ,6410_-~ el 17~0.~ ,. ~0-4-4, - . r--0 r*13 11 -00 1.-4-82* A 9 LLÂ©3513 j 16.29 y _ 324,*JEU L C1 NOTES TO APPLICANT : i U FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925 - 7336 FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR .VALUATION e COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER OF WORK $ '4*LA 99 APPLIES. 4 SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMSING AND HEATING, SIGNS, PLAN TOTAL FEE. SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES. PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK lS STARTED. FILED T P Q REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. DOUBLE CHECK 3 . f 0/ ~ 1 D. L ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS PERMITTED. FEE E CASH ~ ~ THE BUILDING SHALL NOT 8E OCCUPIED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED. ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENTIN~ PERMIT SUBJECT TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME, SIGNATURE C)~ 11 I -' o F . O, -R~T~,41 11-0-/ 9 u APPLICANT: ial, Am .1/q.-(4 Ofir-6/-#0.54- APPROVAL BY DAT q DATE PERMIT NO. LICENSE 4 RECEIPTS CLASS AMOUN, THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED HERE * /'bho *3 FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR --Â·iÂ·14Â£ :' 9 .it,4 R f , .-I--1. a -KÂ¢'?1*?4.. r~-412* . ' |~ A,Blitie It I.' AL .... . 9..P ..I . M v.-7 -9 1 h ..... f- -1- 491*ill'lly,kilft:.: 80,4 , 4- 1 4jigiEVI#,2. Aft r - ...62 .,F*,I */, 4'llililillillililplimalliNBIi lf/. L. 11 1 1 i 1 f f .. t'Jii ' Â·.-Ct... :17. In ;42Â»46&6:.-Â· f,ft' 7 .....04 9 1 2-#f-; Â·Â·*as - Â·UN'Â·3: .: .... U!69 110 t ;afi : ..4/ .947.k â€¢.1.1 , 1- I. ..4 *41.<994/1*/18,6. - /. 04 : '0- .1 2 11 , lk j, t~m, In: :, h ;19ftli- 189#tf.; 11 i 1 -al - ~Alls..Â£.-,mi.IMMIH#~1 ~ 11""UP"'ll"'.PI'lo" ' 1,1,1 il,1,1Ftil~ R~ ....O/,1/0",1 6 P k. 7 6, Â· City of Aspen, Col ido Expt I B d- 4 Bl~LDING PERMIT /:7 ,-- . T r \ +P 7/.t ESTIMATED COST $..0 .G/. i.:IR .... ........ .... -1 DATE....r- 1 PERMISSION IS E[*REBY G40-NTED .. ,1. r,<.... Â£0(-1,4Â·iÂ· Â·Â·Â·Â¥6-,ky...I. - ..c. . 6 ............. AS .LIâ‚¬ :6 c..t: I. k/.E'~.9. <Â·:GÂ·Â·Â· TO ..... 0:':Â« ... ..... A .,42.49... STORY . ji'..9.. .:Â·. .91Â·r:..,f.Â·:9- , 1 + --- 5â‚¬ft 0 . 7 1 .f + ONLOT ...t,...<.....BLOCK ........ ...t......4......., ADDITION ..4..:.6-:-.AE.k.:.-..........0,_,-2,â€¢.......... ZONE ... ..:r. .- - J.. ...e- . FIRE DIST. . ...1...~---......... OCCUPANCY .2.6.tr./1+: ./.29.Â·.l.yfi/ ADDREEir... 42/L;/-6/%664 1Â£,4,<Â· 1-; G-- -P 4 TYPE OF'CONSTRUCTION..'.4.....<L..,6'~f-..%.~..4.~Jm............................................................ i .4 - SIZE -Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·,Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·_Â· Â·r- 9-zirt - *Â» --- - -* - - -- - - -~*~- * * -- - - -*- - - - - / 0 NUMBER LIVING UNITS C<t:~41 4,05 1 Â·-,~r: -:Â· t-~tÂ· Â·RM<â€¢rr NO. ROOMS ....4,4 ........... f , - I-. i ~ ~ .. -f -1-~4. ~ i. ,Â·t STYLE OF ROOF ..Â·Â·Â·Â·.......>,-Â· j:~.2~v:,4,,Â·'...f:<i.........ROOFING MATERIAL/.-f..f..3./ .........................S- ARCHITECT ADDRESS . f# S A -2, REMARKS: 1 i -,r. / i. , CITY CLERK 1 9 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT TO THE CITY OF ASPEN Aspen, Colorado The undersigned hereby requests permission to perform and do the work, repairs, construction alteration or developement hereinafter described and further agrees to do said work in accordance with this application and in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted herewith. This application is made with the specific understanding that it is subiect to suspension or revocation for failure to comply with the terms or conditions upon which it is approved. 9 4- 2- Location: Lot . i Block _ -9-2- - . U 1 (ilÂ· 6 61>4 -'CA ff (~ A-t - C _ 1 A_.77 i -4 . 0 l/ Description of Structure: (Specify width, length, square feet, type of construction, type of roof, etc.3 --__- ___ /1 Li (K ,4 1 Â·r / 1 0 4 >tri Â« ~/51.- *d 4 1-,-4 - //6.77 // hf/f,1- 1 Intended Use and Purpose: __--___TI-_ '/(- -z- /50~ - 1 t COM A 5 11 3 6 --l .-,2/ A 1 1 - / 7 -3--' 67-- , U.L, Estimated Cost of ConstructionÂ· Distance from lot lines: N-- Â£3;4 ; S-- - E-- 1 1 Name of Contractor or Builder: , 62 1-ue.06- c-4-0- 14 Name and Address of Owner: (LL#. c /V-- Additional Remarks: Applicant By APPLICATION (Approved) (R,f/Â£) This-_---1~._13__day of ....(~ 9LifI_, subiect to the following conditions. 0//0/H 0 A A ' City Buildin#-Apector < -V Thel Ity of Aspen City A ttor ney s 0 (fle e Memorandum TO: Mayor and Members of Council FROM: John P. Worcester DATE: June 5, 1998 RE: 234 W. Francis - Information Item on your 6/8/98 calendar .................................................................. Attached please find a copy of some correspondence which was received today concerning the above referenced matter. Additional information concerning this property is contained in your Council packet for Monday night' s meeting. .rnern A .1- i C, (-09 1/1'Uu" 2-1 i 1 - 8 1/05/1998 14:59 303-9207822 STUDIO B ARCHI-"~CTS PAGE 02 f Â£ f i..:11 1. P .1 4 1~ architects 5 June 1998 Mayor John Bennett The City of Aspen 130 South Salena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 Dear Mayor, I am writing to you in behalf of our project located at 234 West Francis Street. We have been working with the Historic Pre,crvation Committee since October of last year with a total of six meetings. As you are aware, Ihe HPC granted us approval to demolish the non-historic garage with final approval of the proposed garage pending a few remaining issues. I want this letter to serve as a clarification and summation to the history of the existing structure and the proposed garage. Firstly, the existing struccure is an assemblage of several additions which are documented with City of Aspen building permits dated 1956, 1959, and 1970. So what is currently there is a product of 1970 vintage. The HPC regulation5 state that structures over 50 years are deemed 'historic'. We also have several photographs from 1952 and earlier that specjfically show the main house without any gaxage structure. These building permits and the photographs are included in our package. In addition, the National Historic Registry specifically states that "This building is non-contributing' to the historial significance of the original house. Please see the attachment. You should also note that we are proposing to construct the new garage in nearly the exact same configuration in mass, height and footprint as the existing. The exact same materials shall be used as in the historic house with all the same details. The reasons we are requesting the demolition is to allow a vehicle to enter the garage from the alley(by moving it south two feet), and to ensure the new garage is structurally cound, energy efficient, and to be able to house vehicles inside. We believe this infilrmation proves without doubt that indeed this structure is non-historic and that we be allowed us lo continue with the permitting process. Thank you. - <A\A- tect. cc: Don and Gwen Mulljns, Gary Wheeler, Martha Pickett 5 5 5 n mii' St aspen CO 81611 970-920 9428 18% 970 920Â·7812 . .. 6/05/1998 14:59 303-92 --~22 STUDIO B ARCH - CTS PAGE 03 1 - -2 -7. Description -Ct %ondition Check one Check one Â£ @exce,lent 13 deteriorated Illa unaltered :6_ original site fle ruins -ir good _X_ altered Il/a moved date fÂ¥atair :11*unexposed Describe tne present and original (il known) physical appearance The 1828 Davis Waite House is a large two story-dwelling wir rectangular plan, hipped roof and a front gable ell. Sited cn a corner, :he house is constructed of wood frame faced in clap-ccard There are sâ‚¬veral mature cottonwoods along the side street and ir front. Thp-Â£ = a low wooden picket fence around the street side , I .. the four lots. 00 the east of :he house is a small,- one story L . ing with a gatle roof and faced with clapboard which is said to b- of the early lig cabins under the clapboard exterior, which was r put on in the 13905. (photo #8, Ba, Bb).The building is contributing. The Waite House is a vernacular Queen Anne design with lit=Z i. ornament exzept in the gable, which is faced with fish scale shirr and has bargeboards. The front porch, on the west side of the eL is small and projects out from the front of the house. There is i 3 story enclosed vestibule with a flat roof behind the porch, which be a later addition with the porch rebuilt in the front. The por roof is als, flat supported by heavy turned posts with decor-tiMe brackets a= the top. The wint;ws ara one-over-one, double hu.ng wood sash and for -:- most pa_ ,---- and narrow single windows or in pairs. The f. r - -411 floor window j.0 -che front and the one on the west side are double -U _, width of the single windows. Al; the rear of the hous= on the alley is a two story, wood frÂ·Â·Â· 1 and clapboard house with a broad gable roof constructed in 1956.* 1959, a one Emory gable roof-addition was put onto the rear of the house connecning it with the 1956 building. (photo #8a) All of - buildings are painted a dark red color with white trim and black accents. The Waite House is a designated local landmark. -1 ~ * This building is non-contributing. ...- , 1 . 1 1 1/1 l 2 --1@ Li \ 1 '/ .r - i . 1 4.0 ' . '-11 ' : /- ~ 04 0 j .r 4 F, . 1 . 4. t. f I f , .' 9 C . , r 1 /4 - 1 r.. .... :1 /,1 1 .... 1 1 . 1,4 ., , .. 1. 1 4. 1 4 '. , j. . ; I , 5 4 / 4 461 .' ,&Ve'lkÂ·'../ . e ri . 4 . I :f, I '. I . , 4.6241: . :, , I . t ' 1 : ... ./ .-4 1 1 0 14 191 - 0 1 ' A. :Â» C , 11 . , 1 . f 4/ .1 - . 1. . + 1 ./ I /' . I * 2 0- ,1k i fr : Â£//0 , . / 3 ~ t, r.)<Pijv-o---- . t fu'lill....ill Â£e,/9- .,2, Â£ 1 + w .1 1.1., Y Â£4 4 34. ''. U .. . 1 - .7 lA Yribi. ~"J ~ .P . '. 41 4., 11'' ? IP" 1'110 At Imighâ€¢.0~~ * 4. 1 . U U ...E. 1 41 1, ./9/IN,uns". 1- 4 M At #T' Elf tur *, . :': fi :124& Â·. f I , 6,1 /1 , - . If,)111 -j 4 1,1 ) -21 -1.,01,Â·2- ,4 1 lit W $1 ' , . .. I 4, , EN; 11 .' 1 I ' 1#- :/ 0 5.01 Z . 74 ' - C ... /1 ....12 T . I i;*40* - p Â· ~Â·* .Alk J. A f.. .. 1:*i*'9?'flir .r X..F ..l 9 3.. S I r " . 4*1404 .I05, SÂ· .:05 /7 '. 4 , liM 7\ , 4-* r W.Â¢9 '~*' *"~ - # ..9 . ./7./-. . 1,1 - ' , r ,>.:'FtÂ¥)'Â·t];1, Â·i F->. '' C" '111:f . 11' 1,5 1 . 1~i?~r:1' .:,if',~:<iÂ·~ 1041'' 1 =qÂ·.41 Vili ' <11 ..fi.il :'J â€¢ti Â·i,itifjl' ' t V.IR 4 iâ€¢ â€¢ Â·..,0--*.. . ii.Â· Â·.Â· f 2 fli 1-0' 4 1 "Yfil .AR:, 411.,5,113'' til -i.t .1-1 F:JI.2 -i.. i a T- -,I l l 4 . . ,; lilli ~. . li IM :* *,IiiÂ·i:il , 1 -- 33=id 7- ' lie / - 3 4< =~;,a 11.' ,Il ,!,tiff :M., . 40 4, , : a 4 4 , 1 . 11 ' * 7,74;, 3 'BA~*tr 2 1.9, al ff'lilli illilill i. a Â·~r.7 1 ,. 11 . * 455 1 al ...... i i.....1 : ~4 04*Â·,iâ‚¬-4 : . ~ Â»,,4 --04'---/.wl,~~7~~/~1,~4: 4.44 :.: ji 4. 2. ' 'f 4 492 ~3339338.-0 44..b t I. I.' ~~ :Jit ..23.2- , 4, - 4/4, ir: 155Â£ .de-li-Â·11.71- , . ....1, 3 1 % .3 2 Â§46Â·f -9 2 MÂ· I . =Unt.> I .' 12 ' I . I:Â·u'9v,Â·& I ,AW:..... 11 41â€¢Â·Â·~ j â€¢lii* ~-"--="- ~:414-3% 0.,194, I 6/U:Â·C : F . 1- -6 . . . . $ ...1Â£ , 4/410:::fis, .'/ . . , 1 . .Â¥r,Â· 2-Y. â‚¬ 0 431692. ).,3. 14*. AN.,92*7. *~/~/~.2. . . . 1 '? . i - 3 ' 4 1.0 ,... ,. I . 'll/: .-V . 4 .r , b :4'W, =~-42289 9#710* Â·, . Â·,4':0 '4 ..i~'- i., . ..4, . $ ' '. ./-', 0/0,=12 191.,2/friA:43/ Put 4 ..41* 6127%**4 - = '1 ~ I' . 1 . .f, 0, ... t. 4 41., 4 -0 , , I â€¢ 4' Â·.. I k I. 4- lill"' 4. , ' ' .* ~7* *0 .4. 1' .:.~2\6 c1*f .4:9,Â·~17*' 7 Â·Â· 4 1 1.*ty.... mal . , 9 -1,4-11 . '6'Â· , ..4 t' rÂ·~ 159 :Â·;24~1Â¥W,~N. ~SAÂ·:~ ~ --- ' . . 4 " .:4 .. 1 0 r 1 29 i. :47 1~MA#wiftia INY: ~74*4 i - 0/ AI i *4 ~QP#''~I Â·fIÂ·4 1Â·' i.Â·1 ,~Â·e:.:,7~Â·14'4-*~37 ' 17.' r. ' I Al,1.. .t â‚¬-u. 1 . .- 4 '11 I 4 , .j ' .1 , . '86 i , ./.quill'llilibililit 4 1 7. 4 4 - . 4 41Â·â€¢Â· L I , 4 . , 1 -4 I. %9 i': 9.11 9,~~% . 1 '' 4 .. '1- 11* 1 Â· 111?'.te t Amt., Â· . .7..~ Â·Cf.:.. 1: 1 h. " M , .. ,E'.'; . .98,1 " r, Â¥ ../. /3. Elf.Â·. 4 - , ,. 2.44 ' ' M .84,'; . 5 ' ~ f 13:14 . i :Â· V 1Â·~ ,Â· .~0'~'r, tt*C~: ,;*~~,, ~ .â€ž,.,* -4*,1 4 . .44/f ... 0 . 9 0"i. t. ..9 .., 4 1, : ' Â·'f'"â€¢ 4 .â€¢til - . 3, 94 . 1 1 . .. 1 Â· /trÂ·"Pj./. G Â·Â· 4 Â£.1 . fâ€žÂ¢ 4,1 :11. 27*40 - .ft --f - ' A '~~'64'~01;iki,; 14 t{~4 . '21@1 1 Avy 0 119'.*'.154..1 ./.- 1 ;*Fr'..4.1-'. . 4.-0, : r 6.*Â·61>At 1,/ . 1 _ i tit,5 1 .-iÂ»~ ~fo k :; 1 0 * - 4.5.. *.--1:.. 1 2*v.r ,-4 ..,42...... Â¥24':,1 -f. 9. ,&1%*4 .- U R.' 12 1.47 ~ 2-1 +0 5 :2 Er% 9 - i P.. :5,Â·1 - 9 . ~Â· lila'47*' I â€¢ 61% : Â·7â€ž19/81 r,-10: E . + ;14. t:**LUMS#OXI14 ~11,5 . ..... 9 - $ ..4, ; eal.In.*49/7/1 7-' 1 ~1~~ 11111<fttlilil//6/11~Allt,R~'1*'198331&|-Witi' 1.4 _ . I A. P. 4 ;1.-1 0 . j.'. rf I , 4 --$*il- MEMORANDUM -*- 53 To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Thru: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director From: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director [Acting Historic Preservation Officer]~ELAJ" r< - Date: 6/10/98 Subject: 234 W. Francis--Conceptual/Final Review and variance requests of non-historic garage and breezeway connection SUMMARY: At the last HPC meeting on May 27. 1998, the Historic Preservation Commission approved the partial demolition of the nonhistoric garage located off the alley of this landmark property. (Please note that partial demolition applies to the total razing of non-contributing, non- historic structures). They did not give approval for the garage replacement, as they felt they did , not have adequate information regarding the east and south elevations, materials, and site plan. The applicant has submitted additional drawings and information regarding the proposed new garage structure. ACTIONS TAKEN TO DATE: Please refer to the staff memo dated May 27, 1998 for previous actions taken on this property. REQUEST BEFORE THE COMMISSION: The HPC is being asked to consider a conceptual/final review of the new garage structure, the breezeway connection, and three setback variances: Rear Yard Setback: 2' from the alley. This requires the granting of an 8' variance; Side Yard Setback: 0' from 2nd Street. This requires the granting of a 10' variance; Combined Sideyard: 2'-8". This requires the granting of a 12'-4" variance. The applicant' s revised drawing packet includes elevations of all four sides, a site plan with roof drainage indicated, and floor plans. This package should be complete for the HPC' s review. MATERIALS: The applicant has indicated on the attached drawings that the "siding, roofing, . and trim to match existing main house, paint color as well". The roof will be cedar shingles to match the main house and carriage house. The windows are shown as double-hung. The applicant has provided detailed information on these windows. The applicant will provide a sample board of the materials to be used at the meeting. NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: The applicant will present a photo board at the meeting of what is in the immediate neighborhood. 1 0 RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the conceptual and final plans for the garage and breezeway connection and setback variances for 234 W. 7 < 1. The garage will be constructed with the materials indicated and location set forth on the Francis St., subject to the following conditions: drawings submitted, dated Received, May 29,1998 in the Community Development Dept.; 2. The proposed garage shall be granted the following variances: the rear yard setback shall be established at 2', thereby granting an 8' variance; the sideyard setback along 2nd St. shall be 0', thereby granting a 10' variance; and the combined sideyard setback shall be 2' 8", thereby - granting a 12'-4" variance. 3. All conditions of the Oct. 8.1997; December 10,1997; January 28,1998; and May 27,1998 approvals must be met. 4..All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. Attachments: Exhibit A Revised drawings dated received May 29,1998 g:/planning/aspenicases/hpc/signific/234,Â¥f/234&arg.doc 5. RIC , 040 /â€žÂ»0.1 u */Le 6.e *64-J O, af f.3-,J ~ 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 10. 1998 Melanie, no Suzannah, yes Susan, no Jeffrey, yes Heidi, yes Jeffrey is the monitor. 234 W. FRANCIS - CONCEPTUAL/FINAL FOR GARAGE AND BREEZEWAY - CONTINUED PH Julie Ann Woods, planner presented. The commission relayed at the last meeting that there was not enough information on all the elevations to take action. Demolition was recommended finding that it was not historic. Council has 14 days to decide whether or not they want to call up an action related to a demolition. A rear yard setback variance is being requested for two feet from the existing alley. This is needed for the turning radius to get into the garage. The sideyard variance request is zero from Second St. and there is a combined setback variance request. A sample board of materials and photo board of the neighborhood have been provided. Sworn in were: 1Â¥laily vic-CLL Gary Wheeler Scott Lindeau Joan Lang The board had concerns with the breezeway connection. Scott reported that the building code regulation requires it for fire code separation. The garage is being moved two feet for turning radius from the alley. Previous us of the structure was for a garage and then it became living quarters and then back into a garage. The fence will be constructed back to what it was originally. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Joan Lang stated that cars entered from the street not the alley. 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 10. 1998 Chairperson Suzannah Reid closed the public hearing. Two board members had coAcems with the full glass connector and that the project has gotten too massive moving the building closer and adding a solid element even though it is glass on both sides. Other members had no problems with the proposal except that the fence should be saved as it is a Bayer design. All elements removed shall be restored and replaced from the same area from which they were removed. MOTION: Roger moved to approve conceptual and final plans for the garage and breezeway connection and setback variances for 234 W. Francis subject to the following conditions: 1. The garage will be constructed with the materials indicated and location set forth on the drawings submitted, dated Received, May 29, 1998 in the Community Development Dept. 2. The proposed garage shall be granted the following variances: the rear yard setback shall be established at 2', thereby granting an 8' variance; the sideyard setback along 2nd St. shall be 0 ', thereby granting a 12'4" variance. 3. All conditions ofthe Oct. 8, 1997; December 10, 1997; January 28, 1998, and May 27, 1998 approvals must be met. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. 5. All elements removed shall be restored and replaced,from the same area from which they were moved. Motion second by Heidi. Motion carried 5-1. Susan, no Gilbert, yes Suzannah, yes 7 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 10. 1998 Melanie, no Roger, yes Heidi, yes jeffrey,yes Scott relayed to the board that the proposed connection is two feet lower than what was previously presented. 706 W. MAIN - FINAL DEVELOPMENT Mitch Haas, planner presented. The applicant responded positively to the recommendations at conceptual. The porch will not be moved to the east but it will be enclosed behind the existing beams and columns with glass. After looking at the plans staff feels it will not compromise the historical integrity o f the house. A flagstone patio is proposed without a roof overhang and a single door as opposed to French doors. All the windows have been given a vertical orientation. Staff feels that the windows which would require a variance from Ord. #30 would not compromise the community goals which are part of that ordinance. Two setback variances are being requested. Melinda Goldrich, owner was sworn in. Melinda stated that the glass will be behind the railing and the existing brackets will be reinstalled. The new doors will have glass and wood and will be similar to what presently exists. A screen door will be installed. It will be somewhat transparent. Melanie relayed that the back seems very complicated compared to the rest o f the elevations. The treatment o f the proposed entry is reversible and the board was in favor of the proposal and design. MOTION: Jejfrey moved to approve the final development for 706 W. Main with the following conditions: 8 4 + Mullins Proj ect: Garage 234 West Francis Aspen, Colorado 5 June 1998 Studio B Architects 555 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado Package includes: Proposed Upper Floor Plan for the Garage Details for windows and doors 4- w"L A k Â·MUDS 0 4114 44 , - -1 - - 1 6 1 Al Al i .. - - -.-I--*-- k du/67-1,4 ecm*A 2 1 0 f *,r -0,4/ I Â® 1 -1- .4 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 BATH, <~ ~ 2 , -- 1 .... /6 1 ' 1 -Fi 1/ -1 \ V.*44Â¢tÂ·lert 28-32Â£14-- 41 1 '42\ 1 --- ./ 0 1 1 - (0 j .. J -1\4t~)/ -- - - -- - - --4 - 4 - Â»FA / 1 1 YA- 12/ _ 4. 1 1 >-49 <D I a ~ ..4, GUEST BEDROOM .. ~ 1 \ â‚¬ 1 -% 1 % I el d / i - F 2-1654< W 14 1 6*6,04302 1 1 1 J 4 1 00/laN fklet,Ned 1 *4Â«/9 477 -7/ - 47Â»0Â« 6,92:*â‚¬ 2 \ #0175: CAÂ»6Â«0 At/4,4 6&90Â« 4/&525 (2=Ell 1 + 1 / 1 1. 1 1 .13.-r C L- , 1 1 I . 1 - 1 Â»4-7 1 /ifiTE -t_ I i 1 - ----T 1 11< \ 13 le- 02Â£ VA-f.. 1 -----m.- ... 1 1 4 /40 ]1 11 4 f 1% 1- ---- | 1 -6 1 9DLMER-- ---- h < vi# --4 1 - N -7 1 1 11 1 -9 l 1 1 \ / 11 1 / ~ -r t .1 1 -- ----* 1- ---- -T- Â«Â«\--0 j --1" 2Â« CO 1 I ' 9121* Â¢ 6,27177'W 4- 1 0 1 1 1*52 .1 f i 1 \1 3/f, / 1 1 - : I 1 I / I 44 17. 297" 4/4 1 1 1 t. 1-- Il TÂ«t]-- 1 1 L /1 CP k / 5623511 ,+At,1226,41 1 _liBLy-- -_4Â»42,1 -' ~42/2 / 4//dZ-AI 4\~ 1 krngÂ· Acce,>9 . PANEL kewe- \ 4 -7 CLOSET CLOSET Ur>TG CH,ANNY -0 1 1 . %- 2.2./115 1 \ UPPER FLOOR: PROPOSED PLAN 1/4" = 1' 2 2 UNE= op lee (P,Mk~ OF /1, N RAP!*58* _ _ 44**F.D Rjoee- 9,54 *~ WOOD 14,NdE>LES <A. . It'-Â£,3/qâ€¢ VICâ‚¬d> t4Â¥ltÂ·161*fe ' - -0* Fâ€¢EW- P.4â€¢88- F . / -ID )*fWAs / -* i < 1- x Â£ Lcue -1 i 4.9 kr 91>NBED Ma,IM- FlAÂ·st}IN& 1%?409) 4 00. \l 8Â¢wee' APP 19112*tesâ€¢ A / ---- - 90Â¢+5 , *Â· -90*r. Whef-f>*OF MEMe#,49& ' . ..... I.: I -M ---" - 44 cox QUÂ·AlÂ©O O Deck Perves , 0% STROCTÂ· /= / // --- -- 1+ e 16' 0.6 AURÂ»b- 1/ , 10% ' . Â»/T/647@l &*Fle (nA fulÂ·LÂ· EAn- 444Â·, Tukgfil Pr 12> INÂ·>UL)<FION (1YA - - -------- Markt- C)#lf -$4*22 \ \ N - 1/ *13 ' 421 - - aNT:NUOUSâ€¢ vmÂ·Irtu<non /83'*&:9 2*Z/REÂ· 4%4'Â«20) /'25 952.5. ~ 0\ t - 1 0--- -- --- ----------- 4*25 0,==,*:3~m~~5 2*72*222 ---# L#le- * Roc.=r Be(01Â£) cry Â£ VINCbw allr \ '434 *o,toe. C NA le>Ca \ . \40 1 k \ \ 1 / , p. - #WRFeok Â·i*S*Â»M . MWK Rop uw imr 1 4491,80 >%4- )0*5 729 0 ':~~ UIDPa,0- RPC>F ( Y)0Nr *pA/AL %,ecroN*9 Â·5#KWN < . Â£*S'*03 -4-- -- --- -BellY.uP ti,M, M: Â«6167. - 4,)04= AÂ·9 Agova e '*114- Prm.4 f 4 3 3 b &*L~ ir/Â¢ A. 1 - - - uve q: E><1Â·57. R.aDA / / / 1 1 0 % ptmooD ulÂ£*ALA'MeJT- \\T 3 ~k.41%/-, , -4.----- 1.,Ne op O.F. 17009 f 11 *A % 1 /9 1-46 M/Â· .506/Re,L - TOP Of RÂ»râ€¢fL Al - .I-- 1- - 14-1 1 : -_- _ I _ 7; ___-1 -J \~0 J 90<Â£81 24' *0â€¢: 40 K.. -4.1 - - t- - - -- - - - Â£0Â»070- /027 -05742/77 4 'V. -. 4 i /\ t kNI ,6!21 =*,20=,= - - - Jt Jr'' 13 4 76**4 02 00Â· -4 \ W.11-- *ANG -DIn -1 0+129 4*9 \ 1 1 Ve 1 /7, l- ~~ VE*FVT&45 0/4*73/4,F' ---------- --Â·----7 ** E' - ,52297ROGt5 le/7- Â·NOT 191 400*46 ODat (CN17*232- , col 1,1Â·500:F -5Â£.Re:*4 - I E + dows Q awneg O= 13004 FeR- BUM WNS. . i 34479 P~*1212/6 Ak'**MENB i wi ul.GHIP,N6 auneÂ¢:UDA Â»,12 1 Â»//aa ARLAY- Aâ‚¬kra'2Â£)'A/<GL>r' Â¢- -t? 90)LkeD OJeRAE>Â© 9002- W' APPUED 12)EM Aa.Â· 91-0061Â·- 5101}Je >+101*37Â·'K - sviA 80#M*5*9 1 Â·4 FrAMINe ks NE,21*0 .4 JbÂ» 06Â¥0,10 - FURR#Â£) ~LOKEJINe emboe Â¢ 4% 4 2 ~4 % 2 Â»FUÂ©/ .2,840/ -- UNe OF ELIN. tcd-9 / (Am*Hao Flrn,2...4 tAMN HcAY,/6 *MeD 8,0. NRCRA f i~ L-A-N8-*FIEÂ¥?N__a FlÂ«>R- (y.IF) 8 41*teD (24Â£)52. (O N.E. 6Â«96< 6Â¥m GA#*602) I \ 4 9 6040 Copb 2/40"0 ~ ~- twCO. r -7 ; 4 1 il l-1 -41==1.-21Â£~ 99:011/,7*10 \ .. 0. 0 3 t--1 . 1 2--lÂ·Â·Â· V . . .0 ... 02 . 700 1 17 -7- - , 'A , 4 11 ' Â»Â·Â·r ~ 'i- 2,55/NFOASS,EO CONC it.ke> .G. # i RE: Slles,Â«VT Â»x Re:Inle. coAK, FOLNE)>floN 0 0 1 1 0 CoNNeq- OR,1N,5 -TD 444 F 122 22 11 __.0 --- t 0 i Dthei . â€¢,rÂ·(Rorok ' 0 \:NORTH WALL SECTION: GARAGE 9'6/4. IV : i (VIA) IL4 1 / * 0)*tEP,9 zied;ki 1 i - 4/ * 4/130 4+11N4>LES \ N \ 410* 8@1.4- 'MK 114 4 9 12 0.6. 1 -m 84=me,25 1 A.74 0/ -Â«f 8% AWOOD AED<L #filif t X r 0 3 34*26 63=:; 0 0222: â‚¬0*â‚¬Â»f (033,) 1 - .fiv/ h.... / 193 RAy=10*5 AS: 47*67: - < /. - f. il ~/1 140 2:KF= */U' 1 / 05AA#A 20,4Â·:sn/â‚¬Â£/=7ED w/ u~?11.1 \\ \ *0,1~13 +s Pr a<1Â·57,- 0,60*:12Â»41Ne> k, NeaomÂ£> _RDJACENIT WINEÂ©Â¥/5 1 -/4 26 A 2299*92*26 ANT- Â«' - - 1 IVI " W , i 1 4 -xE22*1 + Aae:r--:t>â€¢5222*V *4 / ' 1 A,u E C.Z;SLAIII--ekeurfill--- \ \ \ 1.-eek:EF54fin,\ A Al .2Â£h_____ Z,0,>EL /25/ 18:~0977 1 V Â·- , -~id------AAM A k LOU/Re ge, 4/A-0 -----~w. 7 \1 1 \It , -14 , i u56, --F--2~/331 1 El ChRM MA Yam 11*Es ----1#- . . -- 4--- U 9096 Wlwte/ 5 - Â«-4 - ,,41'--- 7 DU614000 Deck- * 104 - - - -. . 4 1 AeÂ»25 1 \WiNDoN UN tr h- 14 /I.4 4 1 9--4 -IT 1 9, UÂ»\419 f / 1 / k 1-1/K 107 -Â» '12*/-*- 1 - I ,-- F-92- T- - - C 1 *â„¢51;42 KLE:*~2 - -- u -----1 AN 4 \ Doo,t) F64Ae. 424114 4IlkAke:A de.**TER-- - ----- - - - 902â‚¬,PLA>A --- Â«W ;413+1*W :5,ar,At-lefj % .. Â» It MA 41 1 - 4 4 4 4 5 4 M n>1 1, 1 U-44*9440 4Â£0/LeS -- - --- 1 le> MMAA *<Idre 92- /WA-Q) -r 44 11Â»9 e le 040 -- \ 1 j, FULL ZA,T 44-409 7900.Â« -----= __ // 10'14- IN40OÂ¢nON g- 19 Â£>-1 Â¥Aâ‚¬ eff, Po. - -- --- ---4 /11 l 1 7 - lfP164Â· FlooR_ Rteet* e 9122*fr!,LfLZZ.22:ZZ.22Lp.. 1/ 4 0/670:,2 0*en' COPÂ»2.3 .-r - .. 74 1 1 1i /. i b 4 1.ory- 4624210,5 Â£9/6" AA >-- ------1tk- 2t 9 i j Â· i <- f -0 *'d:â„¢08=. /*00:* /â‚¬g - 1 E . Al~ 7,7 0 5=242 1 - Â·-+ 4 ' / 6 Le<n><71' 6 Nk} LeÂ¢> f GkZD -P +Er- I - ti Jolâ‚¬16 . Uke*.\Al Ni 417*al F 11 11 - 1 \ 03 ?P1-9 ~1Â», At-- g,imdthle - 02 : 416. 1 __1\AMeite 51Â£>JN6 88(t>N O 4 + 7. 1 \-\\-4--v 1 9X ....., !~u,6 Ar *INS -I----~ ./-4 2 - --- 19 -1/ P -70*iI#45**6 .r . ~ - Y#/M 0*57-4 4 16 4,462< Â£ 74/ Â£* een- -5Â¥*5*:EL -22:2212/213/222/te32:t: - - -- ___ _ _ G~ -92 Â£27*7;26479 f, \ 1.,1.1. Â£11 - , -31+U*-0_Wt)+SLE,L - i . 1 1 2 *m,Mz-_~4*;45*W { i Â» r 5 . *56Â« 1.\ 1 1 1/ j , i. .1./ itt-. Â»17 . fi i-N .J . 1 /// . 1 441*/ 1/1 1 . I \ - i . ' - <JI .:.-_ft, \ 4..., Â«,-444(il Â»â‚¬- ., A~W0946â‚¬y _ __ -__ 1\ -- -~40*1#Nfs ,-0 MAR:+1 0)041'4Â· I . 4- 11, V . 1]ALL) jeof VENT G MUCE) 1Â»24 Ey . 1 FRAME HEIGHT 1-1/16" 3-5/8" 2" 2-1/4" 4 . 4 (51) 2 4 (57) (27) (92) 1-5/16" 1-3/8" ~ (33) ' (35) 1 11/1&â€ž 3/1 L. + 1- C \\4 (17) 0) m~ 3 18 i./1 --1 ICZ 1--1.. 1 . ... -103-1 .C-3 1-1 t~ 1 19 6< 2% 2 ~~2 1 4 10> 01 3% 0 Â«rÂ¥Â«> Or- 01 2 r 77 7 1 1/4" 7 41-1/8", I (61 4-1 - U (29) 1/4" 1-3/4" ~_7/16" FRAME WIDTH r r 16) -41 (44) (11) 4 4" 2-3/4" - 2-3/4" b7/8' - 4 (,Ge - em (70) (48) 1-3/8" 1-3/8" 4 (35) ~ ~ (35) 7[- M dajl h 1_,zi -_1 4 4 7 1 <>~6 T--Iii/1 6Â·Â· 1-3/16" m 2 % r'liiF 1 ' (30) " 1 3 / =Â»- L.L. 4/topÂ«/ 3-1/2' 8 11 -1\ 1 24 -1 - 00 (89) 0 Â»Lun~ 3 2 3 2-13/16" r 2 ~ I (17)- 1 (71) -ifil#,"TH 1-3/8" ~ (35) ~ -mr-}r-or-1 Architect SeriesTA 4â€¢ im t, t' â€¢Â·i. L_jczzl =C L__ILI _1__, V 0 -1 11--1.-InÂ· 0 00 2 11 02 10\ 0 <7-2/ * z o O -1 0 r'+ O 21-1 CD CD [2/0,4:*2*x<r l<22.--r F \ I y Illl 2 111/ i \ -- - EL 1%11 61"J~ ----t - *h Vx. 1 -lm Arr- 1 3 1.,-~>-m--531'0 1,1.11 (FF-7-- p, <cit~irl,r 1 0 F, 4 1, lai 14Â«1 2 31 1 k \4 1 Â»-- 1, 72.11 F/T - ( - - 44 i r Ill 1\ (1(1__-1> Â» <> 1)(r\\ 7=' 1 2 <- _in)~\11\ 1 Â» - -U_Jr 11 - 'iF- m 3 z 7+IN \ CO U) \ O F 11 L= ;0 I -1 E r U) U.' \ O J 2.3 Windows Windows Scale 6" = 1' 0" HEAD 11Â¥B>103HO W Bu!utor iejuoz!1014 0100IN>I388 â€žZ/l-Â£ 01nOIN>IOIBE3 0,8/Z- I .EWS- L Woo_- )ouble-Hung Wood Double-H{Ing Unit Sections Scale 3" = 1' 0" AS9-9 suoulnk\[ SUIUTOf IfordiL <1 uo!1'nvy Buiulor le:)!WaA uomnIN Bu!u!or le<!PeA gwvr GINVr a3XI:I / 1N3A 1NRA/1N3A %====fÂ« HEAD HEAD HEAD - VENT ARCH TOPS FIXED UNITS NBA / WOSNÂ¥131 ' Â·FRAME HEIGHT 1-1/4" m i .#t# / ./B 10-1/2" (32) 6-3/16" . . . I- (267) (157) f... -3/4-I.7/8"- 1" UD 0~ Ra . <25) . 13/32' --i 9 5 N' O (22) 7/8" (10) Laoo k a 3 2 1 -5/82 I el -Ch- es /1---1 8 1 y 2 (D (b. 116]----_-J ! C/1 2319 1-- crl -09% 1 3. E & C 71 (D C-2,1 = R Â«4 .Â¤2 1 39 =6 3, 2 4 \ 7 (7 \ 2 g 1 \ \] / =Of?>2 11 23* 9 1 1 99 4 v ki Â«-il . 17 (25) 1-3/4" . (44) 2-1/8" PANEL HEIGHT 15/16" 6 . (54) (24) lr, U I 01 26.0 -1 . F / ' J.,11 -4.4. 44(4/thel ., 1,1 1-1/4" FRAME WIDTH 1-1/4" SU . . (32) (32) 6-3/16" 6-3/16" 1 . (157) (157) 1" 1 . (25) b-1 7/8" 7/8" 7 3-=r O (22) c5/8;- I 22:3 8 1 -5/82 (16) ' ~ i# 9 06' (16) -5---7 r t-----------1 -___-_ - W C) 0) CNE 1 3 -1- ---------r 1 944 3 ..2 1 CD 1 (DO= 1 453 1 E 0- 3 - 258 1 r-Â·r_ -7 )T f. 3 3 1 - i 93 28 1\} re 11 I h â€¢ 4 4/ 01~ . 1 CO = cb r @i O 0 C- fri X / tx 4 f 'f/~ r f 11 42> 4> 4 \ 234 2 1/ 00 f f. E Â« 1 1 4/ %47 5 .1 1 f 912/. 13/1 â‚¬Ll 21) 15/16" PANEL WIDTH | 15/16" . 1 (24) (24) 0 0 6 Designer Classicâ„¢ Nut 1. ulnu]!xeIN.Ze/LE-Â£ m frame depth for r wall thicknesses d In-Swing* Varies 7-1/4' (184) Maximum aV3H Scale 6" = 1' 0" Scale 6" = 1' 0" Unit Sections ejewixoldde All dimensions are SINVr 39NIH Varies 7-1/4' (184) Maximum approximate. All dimensions are . .. LI 11.222/12,26' 7, F711 m Ft 2 0 *r +0 thful\Â»- Z L I E: 01 1\\ % S B F7771 F7771 U) y 9 ..En Cfft ~ %\P 0 11-1/8" (283) 1-3/8" 3 (35) r 2,1 $1 10-1/2" 3-3/8" . : 6-3/16" 1-1 . ./ . I (267) (86) (157) F721 F771 Lut p, 43'4 63 w m 1 67 f fill 0 3-3/8" 6-3/16" w 3-3/8" 6 4 . I 06) 057) 06) rol [73 771 to Un / 7 6 i <6//// /1 1 1 3 r r--7 1 0 '*7 / 0 ==et / 11/ 1 C / 3* 2. O 1 04 G 0 C. Designer Classicâ„¢ Dell-10 Unit Sections Scale 3" = 1' 0" 22*TE Scale 3" = 1' 0 11IS 1VDVE!1SV 3AI10VNI/3AL10V DOUBLE PANEL DOOR SIDELIGHT TRANSOM ng Wood li 1<423 . .1 C Â«,1-i -4/t e 1 l ./# . P . 1 . r n U L Â· ; 06 1-n, 92 'p ' - 2, F-lf~6 -~ . 1.3- /13 I. t I , Mullins Project Garage 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 19 May 1998 Studio B Architects 555 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado Package includes: Floor plan Elevations Site plan RECEIVED MAY 2 9 1998 AGME,-1 1 ParifiN COMMUMTY DEVELOPMENT 1 94.Yo OJP rvAN ALL- E Y C- -47- PA/wau.. Â»â‚¬ 829- Â»:w. f ' \ 1 A/&2Â¥~VÂ£29*40 '24Â«3â‚¬7-- 4 / FO A PEAMBTE.P- 1Â©UNL 1 Au- + 4*4048 *aws 1\ L --7 (\*h//Â« laÂ»/on) T I 1 ./ 1 1 V 3 I ---/1 lit 1 / A " 1 / 1/ 1/1 1 1 I 2 1 1 9Â« / r / / \\\ /7 7 1 /'' ' Rceâ€ž 'PNOâ€žj - 93 x C>#HOT~ NMAW d?â‚¬90/141="t~22 61 14- Â»* f a#*FOVMN - 1-4 1 if T ~ U .4 / 1 - 1 f 7~--U~f 1 Â«46-74 I 1 - - ar,/4 <12:/1 FLAy-,205' \ 00Â·574 1 2.~ f: 12 / . 421}46126 1 i /6 9 ---> r N=F /Â»'W AA:26,9& 1 y 1.31 j L 1 1 1 L-- -- - -1 7 I 04 90 . G. 41/ 4 dw . / EXILTi N 0 FIELd LE v - ~ FKO F? Li N 13 . e,W * 2 - 1 SITE/ROOF PLAN 1/8" - 1' . . 114 #\ 0 Â£ k :' itt . lilli , 1 3 1 11111111111~11 1, f - Â·. 4Â»w 7 . 'CA-/2 1 . t . .1 ;4 Z UNR AAe/ 4 1&41 1 \ 1 , iii.re 6- :f if l f \ \ 4 \ i j & Ww 40 1 * px# 4 1 - .. 12&/83- C ----- \---------7,1 , 45/085.illifig~o Â·-~4~ \ ; I. 5 - 91---- ' ' - 44 -----L - 1-401 t 04)64.-~*a . 33, ~ - 42WAA #, \L Â·PA 1, 3~ 4 1 ji . 9 1- & VJ / - 1/1 1 W C 44. Â»11>Â»-5>: 1 21/A . Amivt 61,â‚¬ $ >f Â® - ~ 'MECHANICAL i @le 44+ Â· : J 3%5* 3--Tz.* -M-~-~Â»Â·a=54F~~- h I~ 4 . 21) 1. . 4 -< 141 04 r-6.- 21Â·e j >; - / AL/01/4 (41'PRG) / ...~~ )~1 0. 1 *Lute ,+ 7/ 1... 1 't. Cdi, An. eL;5# .*\- i./ /*Ls.4 bw,44~ .14Â· . .. \ ./4,- 0. 601'*(Â£970'0) j>93:k ..tilt /. 6 -00 64 .,/4 .0 1 J \SL#" .. T O TA- 2 R, PÂ· w '. 11 , /v \:19/ 4 I . 4---4Â»/2 691 \ U ~57*,2 . \ th 'O 6/14' / TZ\rf' 'Â· \2<324 ks=1Â«sk/-5*4495& - w \3, / 6 -2=-7# /i- 2 I / 4,Â· 0 2-li% ' â‚¬ la d .,9.- - ' 74 <2 ... /- q *P 14 1 / MUI)*oOM 9- - / N el g =92- h. 1 / . \ I j lITA -9 ~1. g y mu//6 . a \ -77- \- \' 7 3/ .6 ~~naiâ‚¬N 9- ' 3 35 40*46 / ic, c 'J /. (/4-/1 J* 14 9 / \ 60 k* 5--4<:~22'" â‚¬ ''M -LC-- - ' j 1 - 1 , 1 /7 I - 7 -- 1 , /bat. 1 //Fi->/%â‚¬4 i '44-4- AÂ© I --Il.-.Ill-I -I--*I. - - ' -'tifvtÂ£ - - --r * - -ve -1- ..3*-0,2 -~*20 ju - 9 DIA 1100 -Al< D.t. **U M,146. 405 le- r 15-,47 4-iD liff . . .1 4% Of 44 ~'94 11 9 2& 07 -lr f ' -1 - Â® MAIN FLOO011: PROPOSED PLAN 1 /4 " (1/ - Tr 3 1 4 A . 7tr 'exp#lk A lo , A lo Alo er~MURE. 6/51471<080 1 *lsf G Gkt 144*{ 9% VAl 1 0 00- 7 tle.1 -14158.- tg . , 17 / Â·5$&72,6*7- / 1 / .1 1 / . 1 [1 . 3 0 - i 1 2-114 riaiar - - 111Â©11110 Â«------ 1 \ Bill *JINDow 07/410/,EW,8. . -*z>/ 020 -4, - 4 org e o'rps - - - r====ALL=1 ; 4,00 0F- w**_ _ _' _ --I 4 - c_ 111Â» 1 2 -1 1 1 , - - --Â· opLIQUE, i - 1 - - ELl / 1, r a i - - i 1-13> I I t.-1 it 4 11 0 11 11 .---- - 1 RAILING _~ - . . SEE 2/4-11 1 ~ -_ _ _- _- tool â‚¬" 1 1 - .. I ..1 1,11'1= 1 1 ~ 1213[[~111 - .1 1 1 . .1 41 1 1. 1 -1.lili I 1. . : IL.___11 .1 il 0--.Ii--illi--*- -li.li--~* T-1- '- f 1 -~_1_ L_-1.~ - ---- .------------ - 4-- - J J - *Mi#/ . .. f 21 Â· I 1 1 1 1 1 3pplf 1 + EAST: PROPOSED ELEVATION 1 1 1 :- I | 1 /4 " = 1 ' Â· ....... 1 1 i 1 I - L 1 i--- U- -1---- ---1 - - - ---1 -- ------< 9 - 4 A LD I . ; X --Ii- E ji - - 3 4 77-IMâ€¢Â¥5-62-241JiriN#WEIAED 0-222-7-- _f_=2 D;546 --- - .-- - ....... .....1- - ~ ~ - i r--1 i lit 11 19 - - I 1-gue@ M.*M - 460 2 5*6 -j_Â» 9 --- - 3 -0 ..GEN . . t a %. . - 1 1 1. V1 1 )INUÂ· 4 /~4:W 72' 62 97}Ququ,42- AND INGâ‚¬>AfoRNFfo W 2419/ Â·95*7Zhkee, 1 WEST: PROPOSED ELEVATION ~ ~1/4" = 1' 1 1 1 1 j-/2 1 / 2~ *2. 11 A-% - . ==1 1 - J - L ' r --I----- -91952 a.9-6 2,1,4 -2 1 1 - -1 1- Ll 1-_ SEE 0-,2 NORTH: PROPOSED ELEVATION 1/4" 6-1'. . 4 F 40 - 9 *yrTDM--5,Â®rt,$- - - - NMVT- - 4,95 i 1 - lili 1 D IL - .1 1 11 1 - i 1 -C 4011, r Tfh, TO . - _- _ thM:ft 8>49[-l FÂ» M VL 4% f - - - . f . 4% lapLO 1229Â· y . ~ Â·V--_ . 1~.. _LL._ 1 1 Â·Â·-Â·.... j#==dilÂ·i, 1 5Â« 444 -6 ./~ C i SOUTH: PROPOSED ELEVATION 1/4" = 1' ASPEN HISTORIL PRESERVATION COMMISSiON MINUTES OF May 27. 1998 d. The two lots created by this lot split shall have a total allowable base FAR, on both lots combined, equal to 4,257 square feet Of jloor area prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR on each lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into one parcel (the westerly parcel, Lot B) of 5,963 square feet and a second parcel (the easterly parcel, Lot A) Of 6,000 square feet. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on the westerly parcel got B) would be 1,913 square feet offloor area (plus the potential for a 500 square foot floor area bonus if granted by the HPC), and 2,344 square feet of floor area on the easterly parcel (Lot A). The information verified by the City Zoning Ojficer shall be included on the plat, as a plat note. e. Contain a plat note stating that any setback nonconformity's created by the new lot line shall be eliminated upon redevelopment or further development, as may be applicable, of either Of the two lots. 2. As a minimum, the subdivision exemption agreement shall include the elements outlined in Section 26.88.050 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e) 3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on either lot, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk, curb and gutter construction agreement and pay the applicable recording fees. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions Of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. Motion second by Heidi. All in favor, motion carried 7-0. 234 W. FRANCIS - CONCEPTUAL & FINAL - PH - (table Julie Ann Woods, planner stated that her research indicated that the age of the garage is 1956. The actual request conceptual and final review, partial demolition of the non-historic structure which is the garage and the variances from the rear yard, side yard and combined side-yard setbacks. Scott Lindeau, Studio B represented the owner. He relayed to the board that the garage is an assemblage of added on structures. What is there now was 5 ASPEN HISTORil PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF May 27. 1998 built in 1970. The proposal is to re-build the garage and moving it two feet closer to the main house in order to get the vehicle in the garage. Exhibit I - letter of support from Tobin's Exhibit II - letter of support from Allen's Gilbert relayed his concern o f no garage elevations in the packet and the applicant is requesting a final approval. Scott relayed that the only thing changed is the connector from the Dec, 10, 1997 meeting. Susan asked about lifting the existing garage up and pouring a new floor. Scott said if that were done it would change the dimensions of the footers. Julie Ann explained that the east elevation is different than what was presented in December. Suzannah stated that the stair is not drawn on any elevation and the dormers have changed. The majority of the board felt there was not enough elevations presented to make a determination. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Sworn in were Joan Lang, who worked for Herbert Bayer. Scott Lindea, architect Ramona Markalunas, public Joan Lang stated she worked for the Bayer's from 1951 to 1954. She worked in the breezeway that was attached to the garage. There was a garage in 1951. Ramona Markalunas stated that the 1904 Sanborn map shows the breezeway but not the garage. The Bayer' s bought the property in 1946 and built a garage and the Anderson's bought the property in 1953 from the 6 ASPEN HISTORi.. PRESERVATION COMMISoiON MINUTES OF May 27. 1998 Bayers and they remodeled the garage into the caretaker unit that it is today. , The 1946 date is well within the 50 years that it would take to make it historic. The historic garage is now an historic caretaker unit that was converted by R.O. Anderson. Julie Anderson the daughter ofR.O. is married to Morgan Smith who is Jim Hopkins Smith's son. R.O. Anderson was very instrumental in funding and getting the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies started. Governor Davis Wade lived in the house and the title to the property was carried in his wife's name. He also ran one of the six newspapers that were published in the 1880's and 1890's the Union Era. He was oriented in having women vote and was a populist. This building became a landmark in 1982 and it met the architectural qualifications. To demolish a shed without a complete plan is not doing what the preservation commission is established to do. Chairperson Suzannah Reid closed the public hearing. Roger relayed that there may have been something there but it has been changed so much over the years i.e. a similar parallel to the Paepcke house. The real historic portion of the structure is the original house. He stated that he went through his records and painted the house in the 1970's when the remodel was done. He stated that he is comfortable allowing the demolition because an error was made by the City in that there was not a complete set of drawings submitted. Gilbert relayed his gratitude to Ramona in identifying individuals who have lived in the historic structure. He also asked what other elements of the garage/guest quarters she felt provided contribution to Aspen. Ramona stated that the garage was turned into the caretaker unit and the caretaker still lives in Aspen. Most of the larger homes in Aspen had caretaker units. Jeffrey site visited with the contractor Gary Wheeler and he relayed to the board that Gary is doing his very best to keep all the historic conditions such as the windows and siding and the siding is being stored in a dry place. He stated that he looked at the rafters and existing framing and you could 7 ASPEN HISTOI -1<. PRESERVATION COMMISCION MINUTES OF May 27. 1998 see the break to the attached breezeways etc. The garage has 30 year old construction techniques. The hangers are all ofthe 70's and 60's. There may have been something there but it has been significantly altered. Jeffrey relayed that he could vote for demolition. Scott stated they are virtually building the garage. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the demolition of the non-historic garage at 234 W. Francis with the following conditions: 1) Afull set of drawings be submittedfor the June 10th meeting which reflect the drawings that were submitted today. Plans to include a landscape plan. 2) Variances will be considered at the June 10th meeting; also final material selections will be reviewed. MOTION: Roger also moved to continue conceptual andfinal and the public hearing until the June 10, 1998 meeting. Motion second by Jeffrey. All in favor, motion carried. Motion carried 5-2. Melanie stated that she felt the design o f the garage needed to be restudied since it is not historic. Roger stated at final the fence needs to be discussed. 101-105 E. HALLAM - PARTIAL DEMOLITION Sworn in were Augie Reno and Alan Busch. Mitch Haas, planner stated that a memo was not provided as drawings were not presented in time for review by a planner for the packet. A new set of drawings were submitted for the HPC review and possibly the board can give the applicant some direction. The applicant has noticed property owners within the 300 foot radius. One of the major issues were the light wells at the last meeting. The majority of the board was opposed to the lightwell on the north elevation, 8 1 0 . # p , MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Thru: Stan Clauson. Director From: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director [ActingÂ«vt --i -. Historic Preservation Officer] 1 dy . \ Date: 05/27/98 9 Subject: 234 W. Francis SUMMARY: At the last HPC meeting gnMay 13. 1998, the HPC considered this case for Conceptual/Final Review. Partial =em-*uen of a non-historic structure and variances from the rear, side and combined sideyard setbascks. The commission had received a letter from Ramona Markalunas who indicated that the garage that was proposed to be demolish may be historic. The commission directed the applicant to provide more substantive information to verify the age of the garage. The commission was also concerned that certain approvals may or may not have previously been granted on this case. they directed staff to provide all of the background information on this case, and summarize the actions. Additionally, they requested that the architect provide more adequate information regarding the materials proposed for the garage and breezeway connection. ACTIONS TAKEN TO DATE: The applicant has come before the HPC four times. Below is a summary chart indicating what was requested, what was approved, and the date of the action. HPC MEETING DATE ACTION REQUESTED APPROVED ITEMS October 8, 1997 Remove non-historic living Approval of the minor unit at rear of house; revert development, partial remainder to garage; partial demolition; with the demolition; add skylights condition that the rear stair and new windows to the dormer align with the west; new skylight on building wall below; carriage house; new additional research on the breezeway connector slope of the original roof on between garage and house; the rear addition, to be new kitchen addition at approved by staff and northeast comer; new monitor. double hung window on 4-3 vote: some members east elevation of house; ' TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Amy Margerum, City Manager Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director, [Acting Historic Preservation Officerl Y At N \1-,LUV- . DATE: June 1,1998 f SUBJECT: HPC approval of demolition for nonhistoric garage at 234 W. Francis St. Please be advised that at the Historic Preservation Commission's last meeting on May 27th, they voted to approve the demolition of the existing non-historic garage on the alley behind the main historic house located at 234 W. Francis St. Although the demolition was approved, the HPC did not approve the replacement structure as they did not feel they had adequate information to make a decision on the replacement garage. This item - was continued to the HPC's next meeting on June 10, 1998. Although some members of the audience testified as to the existence of the garage some 50+ years ago, the commission was provided with copies of building permits for the structure dated 1956, and subsequent remodeling permits dating through the 1970's. The commission was convinced that there was no historical significance to this building, and therefore proceeded with approving its demolition. Under Section 26.72.040 A., "The city council may also call up for review any decision of the HPC approving, disapproving, or suspending action on a demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, or on -site relocation of any structure on the inventory of historic sites and structures by serving written notice on the HPC within fourteen (14) days of the HPC's decision and notifying the applicant of the call up." Attached is a copy of the staff report that was provided to the HPC at their May 27th meeting for your review. If you wish to appeal and call up this decision, the council must do so no later than Wednesday, June 10.1998. If you have any questions regarding this action or about the case in general, do not hesitate to call me at 920-5100. HPC IMEETING DATE ACTION REQUESTED APPROVED ITEMS extend new dormer for felt there were too many stairwell on north side; new changes to this important shed roof at rear of house in house. place of gabled roof; Ord. 30 variance from window volume standard. December 10, 1997 Excavation of a basement Approved temporary below the existing historic relocation and lightwells house; temporary with conditions: Letter of relocation; lightwells credit. lightwells on east side. salvage foundation stone, no exterior materials removed without HPC approval except those approved on Oct. 8, windows covered for protection during construction. window changes to come back before staff and monitor. conditions of Oct. 8th to be met, details needed explaining how house will be moved and final location. January 28, 1998 Modifications to carriage Approved closet addition on house and other carriage house; larger amendments to previous kitchen window in carriage approval house; removal of trellis on carriage house; minor adjustments to portico and roof on west elevation of main house; larger windows in the new kitchen of main house; eliminating breezeway connector between main house and garage; skylights in new kitchen; wall projection for stairs in east elevation of garage. Restudy new portico at west and south elevation of carriage house 2 HPC MEETING DATE ACTION REQUESTED APPROVED ITEMS to flat roof: restudy portico on east elevation of main house; May 13. 1998 Removal of non-historic No action--continued to garage: reconstruction of May 27.1998 for further garage; rear. side and investigation of age of combined yard setbacks for structure, previous garage; enclosed connecting approvals, materials element between garage and proposed for garage and main house breezeway connector REQUEST BEFORE COMMISSION: The request before the commission is - conceptual/final review and partial demolition of a non-historic structure (garage), and variances from the rear yard, side yard. and combined sideyard setback standards. Please refer to the staff report dated May 13, 1998. It does not appear from the record that the garage or garage dormers were ever approved. although the enclosed stairwell on the east elevation of the original garage was approved. Because the garage is now being proposed to be demolished, the commission should consider all elevations. roof. and materials proposed for this new garage. AGE OF GARAGE: The applicant has provided information (Exhibit B) regarding the construction of the garage and subsequent remodeling. According to building permit records, the garage was originally constructed in 1956 for residential apartments. In 1959 another permit was issued to allow a connection between the main house and the residential apartments as an addition to the original structure. In 1970, another permit was issued to remodel the garage into living quarters. The inventory sheet for this parcel also confirms the construction of this structure in 1956. MATERIALS: The applicant has provided more detail on the materials that are proposed for the garage and breezeway connection. Please refer to Exhibit C. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Â· demolition of the existing non-historic garage and conceptual/final plans for the reconstructed garage and breezeway connection and setback variances for 234 W. Francis St., subject to the following conditions: 1. *e garage will be rebuilt to the same proportions, height, and materials as the existing garage and shall be placedÂ®n the site as shown on the property site plan as indicated in the application submitted to the HPC on May 13, 198; 2. The proposed garage shall be granted the following variances: The rear yard setback shall be established at 2', thereby granting an 8' variance; the sideyard setback along 2nd 3 Ave. shall be 0', thereby granting a 10' variance; and the combined sideyard setbacks shall be 2'8", thereby granting a 12' 4" variance. 3. The materials proposed for the garage and breezeway shall be those indicated on the drawings dated May 21,1998; 4. All conditions of the Oct. 8,1997, December 10,1997, and January 28. 1998 approvals must be met. Attachments: Exhibit A-All previous staff reports and minutes from previous meetings Exhibit B-Building permits for original garage - Exhibit C--Drawings dated May 21, 1998 showing proposed materials 4 C City of Aspen, Col do BUILDING PERMIT tiÂ« T r: - i y ESTIMATED COST $..0.G/. U.U..... NO. .(......./........-.... . .r , -4 1 , 1 1- P A PERMISSION IS H*REBY G IiFFTED .. 44-<M. Â·Â·iff-:11-,Â£~~:i....4.1-1.../A /1 //11 C. I rÂ·-n 4~-'~ l / 7.- 1 1 4 .21 AS .6-/1 ..2.k l.'bÂ£:r.Â°C.dj. Â¢.32*.. To .....elf-~.. ....... A ..d:Â£..0 i'Â£,2... STORY .f.-'.4.-yÂ·Affl '.,0,42... 4- to . ZONE ... 4. Ar.'. 2..~.......,6,Â·. .fÂ·."-".'.. FIRE DIST. .. .PrS.~....... ... OCCUPANCY . . .-7. t.: k. C~,ip. .1.G>.1 ,l.it.:S<' . f / ADDRE 29.32â‚¬>04 / /.., lilli ; f r.. 4 1.GÂ£=k 4 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ..,4.U<L -,4?v ............................................................. 4 , i $ 1 ./ SIZE -.t r NUMBER LI-VING UNrrS;'*=.-.i-4At/:fl,WL.L. 6--~Â·~D'fÂ»:* NO. ROOMS ....-4; .............,<.. f................., - STYLE OF ROOF ............,>... 141;kz'Â·â€¢-4' '-:'-*- ' '" '*'.''' -ROOFING MATERIAL/.1 .... a . ARCHITECT ..................................;.......... ADDRESS .....Â·f..........................,Â·.1......... --, 1 -4 7 1 :..*.r. -I REMARKS: .CP 4--- t i - I / / :t .........................4.......fli.................. CITY CLERK \ 17 (4/65) 2 B.1. BUILDING INJPECTION DEFAR I MEN 1 G CITY -r= ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKINED =LORADO ADDRESS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION OF JOB dwelling 234 W. Francis PERMIT 1 WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. 7:244# *** **5 2 CLASS OF WORK: NEW Z ADDITION 9 ALTERATION 3 REPAIRE MOVE--3- WRECK 2 OWNER NAME Tom Sardy ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE LICENSE ' NA.ME (AS LICENSED) Timberline Roofing Inc. CLASS NUMBER 6966 NSURANCE ADDRESS Box 367 Carbondale PHONE 963-2474 - SUPERVISOR FOR THIS JOB NAME DATE CERTIFIED LEGAL - DESCRIPTION LOT NO. BLOCK NO. ADDITION SURVEY ATTACHED E DESIGN A Lic. BY BY PE vo AREA (S.F.) HEIGHT NO. TOTAL OCCUPANCY STORIES GROUP DIV. AT GRADE (FEET) UNITS FIN ~ BASEMENT UNFIN, E GARAGE SiNGLE C A-TACHED EJ TOTAL TYPE ~ FIRE - 1 DOUBLE L DE-ACHED L ROOMS CONSTR. j ZONE DEPTH FIRST AGENCY BY DATE SPACING SPAN AUTHOR!ZED BELOW GRADE 'LOCR BUILDING REVIE -N EXTERICR FOOTING ~ ZE,L NG ZONING SIZE EXTERIOR CONC. E FDN. WALL ROOF PARKING THICKNESS MAS'Y G THICK - CAISSONS 7, ROOFING PUBLIC HEALTH SLAB U & GR. BEAMS â€¢-1 MATERIAL Built-up MASONRY ASOVE ABOVE ABOVE ENGINEERING EXTERIC)1~ THICKNESS 1ST FLR 2ND FLR. 3RD FLR. WALL STUD SIZE ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE & SPACE PST FLR. UND 'LR 3RD FLR. REMARKS NOTES TO APPLICANT: FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925 - 7336 FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR VALUATION ~ COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTr ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY ZONING OREMNANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY USOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER OF WORK 4 350.00 APPLIES. SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, PLAN TOTAL FEE SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES. FILED T P .0 PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM DATE i SSUED UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. 5.00 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING Dir IN ADVANCE. DOUBLE CHECK ~ ~ ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS PERMITTED, FEE 1 CASH 73 U THIS BUILDING SHALL NOT 8E OCCUPIED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS SEEN ISSUED. 2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT SU8JECT TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. SIGNATURE jf OF (L APPLICANT: 44<) 9Â£444 "APPROVAL BY DATE DATE PERMIT NO. LICENSE 4 RECEIPTS CLASS AMOUNT THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY _ WHEN VALIDATED HERE )Â· 5-7-76 158-76 INSPECTOR'S COPY CONTRACTOR FOUNDATION ( 4/ 65 ) 3 B.1. BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT U CITY - - ASPEN -COUNTY OF PITKINE -1LORADO ~ ELECTRICAL -1 ADDRESS - - 54-- 2~#%-.**e<. &;; J 61 0 PERMIT 00 - OF JOB 0,6 --12 Y -23,4 9 *te/3.294-4 WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT THIS PERM:T AUTHORIZES 1Â»â‚¬ WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. CLASS OF WORK: NEW 2 ADDITION Z ALTERATION 1/~ REPAIRC] MOVE Z WRECK E OWNER 0 NAM Af Â¢35 -jdA,641-L,-p<'.-0 ADDRESS 2$,j#Â£-16 -Â£*- PHONE Jec== ' LICENSE LICENSE CLASS ~0~ NUMBER 51Â£4Â£f 2Â»<-0 . - ADDRESS <~-f /190 -71.-.e-.a:-6<flI~ Â© PHONE 9 2 3 -1/5 3 2 \ SUPERVISOR 7 /1 1~- ,~-244-2-~~-i FOR THIS JOB NAME 006-,2(-20% - DATE CERTIFIED 1- / NO. OF UNITS DESCRIPTION OF WD,RK NO. oF UNITS uj -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK TEMPORARY ,METER TRAiNSFORMERS & RECTIFIERS NEW SERVICE ENTRANCE WIRING MOTORS & CONTROLS NO OF OIL BURNERS, STOKERS, NO. AMPS FORCED AIR SYSTEMS CHANGE SERVICE ENTRANCE OTHER L -1 .NO AMPS MOTORS H.R CIRCUITS SIGNS r moo LIGHTING NEON EXT R SIGN & 1 TRANSFORMER HEATING NEON ENT R SIGN & 1 TRANSFORMER ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMERS, POWER SUB-CIRCUITS EXT. OR INT, UTILITY (QN~,GLSPOSER -1Â·62 a 2 COOLER, FAI'RYEO, WATER HEATER; NO OF INCANDESCENT LIGHTS OTHER FIRE DETECTION-ALARM SYS'M. 4 FIXTURES /Ocr OTHER REMARKS AUTHORIZED DAM'E AGENCY BY PUBLIC WORKS L--- NOTES TO APPLICANT: VALUATION FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925-7336 OF WORK $ I J - THE VALUATION OF EACH OF THE ABOVE UNITS SHALL 8E INCLUDED IN THE VALUATION OF WORK. PLAN TOTAL FEE FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, THE C.TY OF ASPEN ORDINANCES, AND FILED T P .0 - 7. 0-u ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS, CITY ORDINANCES, STATE LAWS, WHICHEVER APPLIES. DOUBLE CMECK LE PERMIT SUBJECT TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. FEE ' CASH rl $ 6.-72-6 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. L A FINAL INSPECTION SHAJ.6 BE MADE BEFORE POWER WILL BE BUILDING DEPARTMENT RELEASED, AND BEFORE YHE, BUILDING MAY 89-QCCUPI.*O.-05/ SIGNATURE , / 1 A 1/\1/- OF /7 JA fl=-1-\ 224ffIVayfl<~ 11-14-90 APPLICANT: Difi<F(*64'-Â·~r75*-111,35-c-,~ APPROVAL BY DATE lit 4 DATE /AVIT NO LICENSE -Â· RECEIPTS CLASS AMOUNT THIS FORM IS A PERMIT 05129 - WHEN VALIDATED HERE j. 1/-11-3 G ltv/ CONTRACTOR 0'21 22 19 N *' INSPECTOR'S COPY S lut,D.1 + 0 8 architects 21 May, 1998 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Julie An n Woods City Deputy Director City of Aspen From: Scott LindenhaW Studio B RE: Garage/Connecting Enclosure Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Julie: Please find enclosed, drawings 1 through 5. The materials and details for the garage ar proposed connection will match the existing materials and details. If any additional information and/or drawings are requested please do not hesitate to phone Respec t~~t>'~ Arthu~Fuenp~ Architect 555n mill St aspen CO. 81611 970 920 9428 fax 970920 7822 '/ n L t// 0Â·f. 410,21,--4 82(*mY LAN,a . .A'L-0 ~0'~ 17 R.0, 63,4 eg.z:2 -1 0 f 6 1 \ 1Â® I 14) oFÂ».1 7 ir) 2. 60*6, Agtv \ PM,"-LdE,,4 - 9--7- 1 .7, 1 f 3 'r , --p. L d*21 44-0 -1 GANAGE U=-ARAâ€žJ 405=04% , 44 k,TORAGE:- ; 4 \ \ P'M,40 8:.1 -7 â‚¬ _ 2~~26,<i Awa~&+ AVA/4468Â¢2 Above 8),2 04#34926/Sth<p< 14 90 + 14 1 1 37 243 (-g> te coN FUR/'Pi) W ./- 4 fogAU) 211 001 LOINCp 0*001Â¢EMPH fj Â»Â« dz.YE 1 1 " 140â‚¬4Â« Lool/74 1 124,6/2 9RoN va .f 4- &4= A.f- 4 f i 1 â‚¬Â»0-Rezw @ 7/ 9;40*16& h /10\ 4- 43 .''ll' -.8.90:45-@L 4Â¥ tadtfitÂ·*t .4/ tÂ· 4,1 Utitâ‚¬ .f lett, tt:' 16 J FAAM 52) PlATFOAA Â·4, e te" /1,002 64<?, A. .0 43) * C MECHANICAL f 6, \- 60/Cr-iN BENO-1 0, 572*4 ~5,, >, 1..14>f=29;40**/ .517:1243<-~'98? .24.UN,LiÂ·c(12 4464*041 . - / 44\01146> \6 /R-#41-L -Â·- 11- r -f-L 'f~*Â· -' /6 LE 4 le' AgeNOM.* t/ 11 -- / 1 " EBBELe)// De::>A_ A.0. 7 11 3. '24 ~ 1187 1 /4 '- 9. 44'P*kic.*0% Netx 7 kify . / \2 \A 77- . \' X \ 1111133. %../ 57%/3 1 - 219 k- ~ f ./9 6 V 7, 4 9.Bal / .4 li~Fy 070//hyj (It, >f r ./. -~:~ CLOSET Li $ p;tÂ·rj.~,~, U.eof:t 17 5 \ / 4 -> . -L .. ..0 ~AiL-.3 -12 v #: 4 - 4. /71 AQ- -- . 4% 1 PORCH (,121 MUDROOM | --/-0 ----t /.\ KITCHE~N 743 i .- 12 < ,$ ,â‚¬A/6./AG ~~ :~11*, \ CL 1- -5=- \ \7 -AlÂ·u\' / 1 \\ ~>3 '1 \ I 1 XiII 7 / 1 64,> \ t 5-Hyz-,0 1/ 7 I-Â·417.f Â£ a i )%%) U E hy 1 1 7 2, 0 / Â·Â· .i Or#f 1 /0 f..4 + I Â¢ k Â¢/ 040. 4>51 -- 1./ A-6 3%2- BREE 'IRIT W'U-IN 4 6 14. 11'L typo p+16-e 4 0 6 D,rÂ· iTU 0 -0 - - - .t # 4///f t /, l * It- 1/ 4-3.64 1/4 --.. 9 4 4 - a n- ~Â·P<t~, 4 4 0 i< 9 DIikING 33 D EN / STUDY 4. 4 % 4 4. f AÂ«Â£55 4 00 A- :11 /, 0~ , n , A A;jt 5 m -- I.-I----- ...411.- 4 . .. - In Nrld UVILLNVJ \299.,9*415 4023 uaamiaq 3,Insoloun UOI}Jauuol pue 'asnoH uleÂ·IN SPLIUmol laaJ OMI PaAOUI afSE.Ie~) SUIMONS â€ž0 -,1 = â€žt/1 ---1 EX ISTING MAIN HOUSE r --INET/FlihILTZ,ZE,F---412 -7 - NEN- OCTAGON--mEYONF- -- TifATEKCALS- ANDY- VE[*11-5, + - =18 MATCH -Â· EXISTING . 1 r r T -I:~RECON.6.-UNK f SE 14IT WEEVATTON- NEW -Avp \T10 11 - -- -EM911>R{ 0+- - 0 -1- Ill k L , - 111 1 1 1--i --Ii- -- L_J 1 ./ I -1 111 -- 9--- 'i --- I.- ----1-- E-W-~~ 0.7 - 0 61- a 1/ / 1 1 1 Â»L - -*Ill.- 1 -illill- -i-- -..1---* ---9-I- .--i-.- -i--- Il---I .*---- -ill---i- Il--I- --.Il-i-* I----I -1 ----I ---3 1 L -- I- -- --I-- --1-- 1 -Il ---1 1 1 PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1' - 0" Showing Proposed, Connection Enclosure between Garage ~ and Main House (Garage moved 2 feet toward main house) 414!lkA 40 layfe -Il Y 1=Z' 1 1 11 1 - 11 1 !! li IL-7 J 4 11 144 - --- WOOD VEWT1- LATION --' ' ' Z=/02 =2*49/2.3~-_ r----ij~ 1 -1 / 99.--212192 T 7 1--- I f- - 1 E--1ITT--1 AE-FURJNA,4 12*141 6 WALK- + RNLI/6 -_ - 11!i 1 - -- --------- /234&:y/,401~255' t+225@0<84#<71-ZE opal cul NER 41-RUQUAJE 7%.Â· /1,1A-ll ~\ ,70 1 1201 4.71 L__1 ' L__Â© ~ 0,5*yâ€¢!12 L-Â«ove--ae* m t< AN/**2 644-dE 3, / t --- ---- 1 -f~LIJOT-- -Â·57Â»2 4Â£7+S. 91.-ABÂ· 1 L , 1 - . 4 t .'. i . . " # I. *A-6 6- 1 1 6 11 47-- zjlpÂ«~4Â·ae RE*RE \ /*ah,/4 4/We A.> 1 .1 1 1 1 SEE Â·04 -/1 1 I i - Ill 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1- SECTION THROUGH CONNECTING ENCLOSURE - 3 1/4" =1'-0" As viewed looking south toward main house V ./ 0 11 - .5'AE 11(AW INGS *te ANP %5 f}Â£*E- CF ADP 11 UeN ftop -/ vioo Â£3*INGUE6 p '*52:+1 EX!*1*<3 Â· 1 \1 \ V *7~- Of 1 - 41000 3 J 1 - *49 1 7 f-4/2 6 FD=O P.lekID tAMEÂ·H- 0312- 1 \ - 1 1007- 62$40:* 0=r Al 4709 'TB -14 08 age,koe }RECON/Aposft) llc m i x U- â‚¬ 4 14XED p 'Â«0\ cele,3 N.- ?Nim- *51 eau *h-6 (1400 83 4 / \ / /c 1-2 4 ./r ! 1 1 ~ ---<---- Â»h -K9-24 . 1 9 - -*/ - \. 4 - ----- YIP,7. f*APE OF= F Ne# MOD moN AECON- 4121)61*0 7> tAMâ„¢ - /1 - ~ 2-jf :21$1::PZV~ 4, 1. ' 1 i: j Â»*z2401/ 14242:a // wA '5tt*le- 49\588- c al w,N D>glcu \t*41- (lu-)60<17&41-*14126) r Lu,b Â¥1 e"Â«E iFÂ® FL. .I f - --~ FwÂ¢~) #t. 76*LO. - ~ ALÂ» .Al- 1 \. 4 8"0+3_e *607 ---- 1, F: WEST ELEVATION OF CONNECTION LINK 314" =V- 00' 4 "\ .. /*/,482*929 ,, / P /00 ..1 1*1Mt..0 1 t 510/Ne ~ AMN *FleT OPEN -rt M,OP /2 60044 j #00,0 Â¢ 60*4 OCA -- A.4 66(ON D Cumâ‚¬Â¥ 4) *000 1 mICEZ) 4, OE lâ€¢16.1-4 41Â»10>Alâ‚¬39 4444. 1*oeD 174#4 FIN. FL, . i ANIgHED 42 6â‚¬,De 44 6â‚¬*De rÂ« 1/ 1 i , . I j I ' Â«--' 606/8.4 446 .. 1 7:<---- g.0, Bwk:7- ' SECTION THROUGH CONNECTING ENCLOSURE A 314" =V-0" 9 i , PrAVe/:1444 f 4-j, 46- o-â€ž~~.4.-t MEMORANDUM * Flk-06 A/00j-C 3.-A TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission *crfix p.+1 1-6 GÂ« C 4..4 14J, ,/ THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director 0 Al AL A 0 FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director I Ily cr< 1. r O-y. n A * Â»1.- 1 [Acting Historic Preservation Officer] 1 . RE: 234 W. Francis Street- Conceptual and Final Review, Partial Demolition *C> of a non-historic structure, and variances from the rear yard, side yard and combined sideyard setback standards. , 1 & tr + k>00 02Â¢ 7111 5 of KE< i 1-4-wi. ~ DATE: May 13, 1998 4 K 140Â£,1 to 16- GJ Uk ff&*Chijt-1 .fl,Jkj SUMMARY: HPC recently approved a renovation of this structure, which included W... changes to the carriage house, a new kitchen addition, and a new basement under the 'ftÂ·-4, house. / LL> t.t-# .th, 4- -f o.,,.../ f At this time the applicant wishes to propose the removal of the existing non-historic garage, the reconstruction of the garage, (and setback variances to allow the reconstruction in approximately the same location) and an enclosed cpnnecting element from the garage to the main house. , rat 4-,A-JI A-3 460 APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects. (1.1/Kl *at- 41 LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street. - 0-Ud . * #44.-lb lov~u '-0*14-~ PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," . 1 Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all 1~4*f four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land ter' Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant is back before the HPC to review the plans for the new garage and an enclosed connecting element between it and the main house. , Though the applicant originally presented a breezeway connection, they subsequently withdrew it as the owner decided not to pursue this detail. However, once it was determined that the garage, when reconstructed, would be placed 2' back from the rear property line (to allow a turning movement into the garage from the alley) and hence, 2' closer to the main house, the required distance between buildings could not be met. Therefore, the applicant is back before the commission, seeking approval of the connecting element which should satisfy the building dept. The garage building is proposed to be demolished. It will be rebuilt "in the exact proportions, height, and materials", but will be slightly relocated back onto the subject property, setback 2' from the rear (alley) property line, requiring an 8' variance. Similarly, the garage would be placed on the 2nd St. property line, a 0' setback, requiring a 10' sideyard setback variance. The combined sideyards for this property are 15'. The applicant is requesting a variance of 12' 4" in order to allow the relocation of the garage to occur in approximate the same location it has been. Staff supports the variances requested. The connecting element will count as FAR. The applicant has indicated that they are at or near their allowable FAR for the property. The applicant has indicated that the enclosure will be approximately 30 s. f. of FAR. It appears from the plans that a door will open into the garden from this connecting element. The roo f pitch seems to be slight, making the octagonal roof line behind seem wider than it might otherwise. It will also shed rain over the door to the garden. This roofline should be carefully considered by the HPC. The applicant had previously included a design for a connecting trellis between the main house and the carriage house, but has since withdrawn this request. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The overall proposal is a successful renovation of a group of historic structures which will be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: With the modifications discussed above, the proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: With the modifications discussed above, the proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. Partial Demolition. No structure shall be permitted to be demolished unless approved by the HPC or exempted pursuant to Section 26.72.020 (G) or (H). Section (H) indicates that "a structure that does not contribute to the historic significance of an inventoried ,' parcel is exempt from meeting the standards. . . The proposed garage structure is non- historic and does not contribute to the historic resource. Staff believes that it should be considered exempt. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Conceptual/Final Development and partial demolition application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Conceptual/Final Development and partial demolition application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Conceptual/Final Development and partial demolition approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the demolition of the existing non-historic garage and the Conceptual/Final plans for the reconstructed garage and breezeway connection and setback variances for 234 W. Francis Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. The garage will be rebuilt to the same proportions, height, and materials as the existing garage and shall be placed on the site as shown on the property site plan as indicated in the application submitted to the HPC on May 13, 1998. 2. The proposed garage shall be granted the following variances: The rear yard setback shall be established at 2', thereby granting an 8' variance; The sideyard setback along 2nd St. shall be 0', thereby granting a 10' variance; and the combined sideyard setbacks shall be 2'8", thereby granting a 12'4" setback. 3. All conditions of the October 8, 1997, December 10, 1997, and January 28,1998 approvals must be met. Exhibits: 14 5% i tw 61 10 -Ar/O(# juf{,-,14 -41 k; $ 1.-'.c o 62.-56 100,n.g /1,1 16-/ A. Letter from Scott Lindenau dated April 22,1998 B. Letter from Arthur Yuenger dated May 7,1998 ' M,odfu-7 , CLA#uk of do/M us 'Un pÂ«-05 ---J 04/22/1998 11:09 303-9207822 STUDIO 3 ARCHITECTS PAGE 02 NX /1 tgrr A SrUBIL B architects 22.April IL,4>< Amy Cuth r j e / HI'l - I-'it'câ€¢Â¢ tor City of Aspen 130 South Galeni, 4-4-ret Aspen, CO 81612 Dear Amy, This letter .erves aÂ·Â· Ilw requested information detailing why we are requesting the demolition of the non-histor.1, 'garap ;ocated at 234 West Francis Street here in Aspen. To sum up the hi,t- ils you know. we wen told that this structure iâ€¢ non historic and could be completrlv remo'Â·,ed. relocated, or re-built because of it not being an original part of the historic houht'. 'theses seÂ®Â·naric,5 w, i e reviewed with both yourself and Sarah Thomas. city zoning officer. Originally, We were gl>lag 4, re,7.,vate the interior but because of the logistics of raising the existing house to make way for theÂ· basemeriÂ· <ind the fact that we cannot get a vehkle into the garage from the aUey- Wc would like li, demaiÂ·Â·h the garage, re-build it in the exact proportions. height. and materials, and mow? it do.Ker te lie hollse by two feet 50 that we ean get a car into the garage. Becautie Onilliance 30 regulated that garages cannot be entered from streets and that alleys are preferred, it M the logieal solution. Also, the current structure is not used as a garage and this strlicturl, n.eed,4 all nÂ·w fc,<,111'1 114. Ind a 310.b to accommodate the garage and the upper level, Please call mr if :h.Â·riÂ· 14 additional information that you should require. 3est RegardN. #*7..AA â‚¬ Scott A- 1.indi.Â·naL Ala. cc: Don and Gwrn Mullins, Cary Wheeler 5 A : lilli 51 aapen 00 81511 970Â·920Â·9423 Ing 970-920-7822 6*440* s - 8 e - STUDIO B du- i Â» 0- 1 4 74 13 9 MAY O b architects CON'MASAE,Â· ' 1998 .....UNIâ‚¬ 13' j <IN 1 veVELCPMENT 1 May, 1998 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Julie An n Woods City Deputy Director City of Aspen From: Arthur Yuenger/Studio B RE: Garage/Connecting Enclosure Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Julie: Please find enclosed, drawings 1,2&3 illustrating our proposal for the Connecting Enclosure if the Garage is moved two feet toward the Main House. If any additional information and/or drawings are requested please do not hesitate to phone. Respectfully, Ci J / 1 % 9; U.*f/4 C. / , 1 Arthur Yuenger 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 May 8, 1998 RECEIVED Historic Preservation Committee MAY 1 1 1998 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street ASPEN / PITKIN Aspen, CO 81611 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: AN ASPEN HISTORIC LANDMARK 234 W. Francis Street, Aspen, CO c Davis H. and Celia Waite Home Ladies and Gentlemen: Aspen has been fortunate to have the right people at the right time to maintain its lifestyle and character. As a silver mining camp, it quickly attracted the investors to fund the expensive mining techniques to produce and ship the silver. Some of the investors and the miners laid out a very cosmopolitan city, which quickly grew into one of the larger communities of the day. They built beautiful homes in the midst of lovely gardens and began to enjoy an active lifestyle with social and recreation activities. Davis H. Waite came to Aspen. He was an attorney and he was publisher and Editor of The Union Era, one of six Aspen newspapers, copies are available in the archives of the Aspen Historical Society. In 1891 he was elected Governor of Colorado, the only Populist Governor Colorado ever had. He was a supporter of: Women's Suffrage, Labor rights, and a visionary re land ownership, silver and humanitarian rights. The Waite family owned Lots K, L, M, Block 48 in the 1890's and into the 1900's. Shown on the enclosed Sanborn Map 1904, the house located thereon shows an addition to the rear of the building. We believe this is a portion of the house today and is a part of the historic Waite home. This dwelling was later owned by Herbert and Joella Bayer. A noted architect, he had his architectural studio in this northerly portion of the house and there are several people still living in Aspen, who worked there for him in the 1940's and [950's, who recall a garage off the alley. Since it is over fifty years old, this garage would be historic. This portion of the house is now a caretakers unit, since it was remodeled by R. O. Anderson, a notable individual who helped establish and fund the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Anderson Park near the Meadows was named in his honor. This entire building is an Aspen Historic Landmark and no part of it should be demolished. The HPC should furnish LANDMARK homeowners and future purchasers THE HISTORIC DATA on their homes, so they can appreciate the history and character of Aspen. If demolition Or overwhelnking additions continue as they have in the recent past, Aspen's Landmark and Historic dwellings and buildings will disappear with all of its community character. PLEASE PRESERVE ASPEN'S HISTORIC TREASURES. Si~#fly, f . 4mona MarkaÂ®nas FOrmer City Codncilwoman who established the HPC. P. S. I will be unable to attend your Wednesday meeting as I will be in Denver on business. I was unable to see the file until May 7 and could not gather all the information as quickly as I would have liked. CC: City Council V 0- 11 4 10 ' W 0 4 0 9 N.39.D , ST. 300 3/0 3j6 Bol 11 - 400 R 75'1 Az / 20' â€ž| 74 20' K A d K 4 r--E 11 /4 2 ,Ill. 2 0 _ . 9 2 8ke 1 Â£ 8 : .... Z 1/ 0 - - 1 0 C r ;-1 C :142 1 0 9 1.1 1 01 1 0 02 1, ' ~1 * C>Iz, " /,1.j td A# *1 A f-J-# 0 Y LA 11 .- 1 1 -:01, 1 0 -42 11 - 0. 41 9 0 11 11 ~ m _ C LiA] 1 2 --1.-El I e :,r F U F g, r.-21 / 11 4 76 LI I 1- - 0 t1 0 R H R' 9 11 io I s 11 3 , 11 11 30/ 401 11 0 0 0 0 . elk N. 2'iD 0 S 0 9 0 300 0 L 400 1 4 W out# A A 1.,Â·c. 1 |p n 31 1 0 0 4.1 ~-7 Â£ 8 . 10\ 18 0 11 - 171 M e 12 4 44 N 2 0 0 NO 0 N ~ 0 0 0 1 22249 79 0 / It ' ~48 5 la MP [7)1 0 0171 k 0 1,/ lit, N 1-1- I ' u 71 P F 4, 0 6 4 7i--9 6. 0 4 L Auâ„¢4 - 1, 1 L.1 1(1 H Ic:4 29 1 E ld H. 1 /ON [73. 1 1), 1,1 r-717r R 1 4 1[-1 - 1 W 1 014 -1-1 L__12.9 0 97 / S X / 2 1 0 0 - 301 40/ 409 -3~ /0 -3 4 4 . 021 - , 1 N. 1â‚¬1- ST. AN, 6 300 3/0 3/2 ~ 0 400 4/2 1'. el 0 1 19: CD 0 4. 114 -1"-71 , Al '11Â· 1 1 3 e _ 8 Id 0 e- liD hT 71 9. I .1-9 4 CO I a 1 3// W Â· ,;loitic.-4 824Â«N Utte- Iâ‚¬- 12 R.O. A,â‚¬ i/Hi-Â» 00 1 2 j --rn - -4 1 Â·Â· li -it i IIi D 111 lilic 1 ~ 1 9 Â£*At// 7 A-11 ~ 7 1 i P 1, <F ?/3 /,5 '4 / 132*2 ~- d2*2=2 440 7 0*WAW GANAGE Le #40 7 45+ORACE /37 , /9 4--------1 r--- plee,4 Â»?*A AVA/LAY;UE- 161 1 1 >09â‚¬ FR Ateezeivkf 1.9 '10 41 1 1 9 ---fif (-lt> 142- CO/F:}FÂ·214*el) Bf Â»Â·Â£,0 AN* i ~ /06*Â«52 -/4 1 8,3 -7. 00EDINF V#BArT/4-271Â©) 1, ve/FY UXAT, 04 Â£248,6 ff 1 1 4 ~.. f 4pt 4 6- 74 = 9- G SkÂ»*leA 940}1 202_ 1 4>04 0 -WELD ' t Arnt ~4Â·"1 Nuff ;~ 1 :U' 4 4â€ž,ty , t'Â·â„¢Â·r.6. 6 12 h ti> FgAM U> pl.47Â» 14 ht MECHANICAL ~ 44 1 . 4 4 -4 I'/ -4, 4'4 br- 69#7--1,1 38+94 7 53*9 4 w ~.0*3432*4Â«34~Q:Â·ry, 90#â‚¬ 31-41.34Â»30-I'.692 VEÂ«Â«9*249.4 L. / 0\ V ENt 1 l \ % t > / 1Â®01"6 \6 /GAM=k-ru i , :.432/8/UM VE ~C Â®1 4 416 - -~ C /." &91Nyl-23*..... ~~(3~ "--/ *ig 4, 64/24/2344,~0~-6 40 24 , \3 . / \ 1 \ X. /- Z ' /\ \146Â»-1Â« A.LV = 15 57*21 m xity X \ $ 4 \ 408: 6,/#WH*%, *:Ef/,Â«71 '9:.5<'' ",:-", /9> 1,1,1(frEap,4 /1 A / 1 f ~ *AboM ~ ~t,-- --/4 -- ,\ - 1- -1. Â¢1 F CLOSET t f 24Mfff 4400994 7 -/\ / Z : 2 *-*-4 4- 49 3 \1 -- r --- 9-r . 4 /1 45)/ 1\\3â‚¬ 0-7=k' -1 W.u. - 3/- I . Jr / *~~'~- --/ MUDROOM ~ 1 KITCH~ c \ / \ /62/ / ' 647 f A?ri 1 1 21 11 I \\ 5 / 1 &1Vt' Â· 74 1.12 01.1-2-,fyflÂ·Â·Â·F,239.'i, 41-4-7 -f 1 .: f f. f <Ae .4.~1,411111 - op t-- Prw 7 223 1 3 1-177 24 911*r VENT 3019-4 ~ 94 f+*0 4*J64 *A. â€¢.4 0,f. 4Tl)0 - Nill MPLIN\Jae. 406 0 9///Li f 4 - --9.9/1 1 /3 - // e 1 31- f 4 1 44/Itt- <49(,0 j>/ft 12 9 Â¢ /1 T 11491>10 1 0 14-19>13 1 gy Â£ f DEN / STUDY ? D INING 4 ~ 46Â£44 . t 4/imiyummufA. Al 9- T *- ... -I .......-.---- BEA 954 .,e*%*11- '4083 U332\Al ainsopua SU[1031IU03 7 'asnOH U.[EIN PIEM.04 134 OA/4 paAO~CU 322.IED Su[ 1 1 1 1 1I 11 11 -7/1 Lf - fl M-----7 1 1 \ ./ 1.\ 1 \. 1 \ 1 1 Ki \ 1 f 1 f I / /4 li l 1-- 4 1 1- 2/ - --122 1 RA ~=--- 5- 1 11 F . ~-----1 1. 1 1 L4 1 1 r-- - - -1 1 1 1411 1 I ji U 1 \ 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 4 i l: 1 \ 1 y 1 =7 - - 1 -41 4 PC=)2 1 .LI ~1 / 1 r D- -- -- - - - +1~-- .~j~-i- -- - - j--IM~ PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION 1/4 " = V-0" Showing Proposed, Connecting Enclosure between Garage & Main House (Garage moved 2 feet toward main House). 2 Tl---1- 1 -0 9741042 40 'ANRe 2-3 -4 . Ail- fÂ· 4 i''i - 73 ____-- 410019 724TILATIoR , - lili I b;=-- PE-FUR.24Â·5+1 41,5-f 6 WAU, + ?OAs+1 h+JO \BooRpoeki-E- 21,4/16 -- opek} wl NEON Â«ROC:7UAJE ,7Z:' 7----- --3----7 . 1 -IL..zz 4TDNEL 091Â£%P OR , I | 31&7 1 T~=21-0 1 1 1 1 1 1 t. \ 1 . ' ' --- -Â«-7 1 1 1 1 7 11 ,â‚¬227>Nufmt A* ' 1 . 11 | | 1 || >|7~ 44,42646a /,0~E 1 i d 1 -1 5%Â¥A-/1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 Ill 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 -4- L -4 _ 2 -1 1 SECTION-THRQUGH-CONNECTING_ENCLOSURE 3 11 4 " =1'-0" As viewed looking south toward main house * P S fulÂ»Ut) 0 4, 1 '-0 8 architects 6 May, 1998 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Julie An n Woods City Deputy Director City of Aspen From: Scott Lindenard Studio B Architects RE: Garage/Connecting Enclosure Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Julie: Per your request the following has been provided: â€¢ Window and door details, and a wall section â€¢ The Proposed Upper Floor Plan for the Garage â€¢ The presentation board of the existing house in order to illustrate the existing vegetation and landscaping. Gary Wheeler will be dropping off the sample board of materials to be used on the garage exterior. If any additional information and/or drawings are requested please do not hesitate to phone. Respectfully, Â«h Scott Lindenau, Architect A.I.A. 555 n. mill st aspe n co. 81611 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970 920 7822 , 1 --1 1 ... . * 1*ru, 40*r * O 0Â». 64- 1 * 3 -Bc & . h.4 Â« + - CH? re.aÂ·~3 <11.,A 3< C.t C/~-8~- 181 13 1 - . *f 6 C#-wfu l / rihe-t P w h 4 3- â‚¬ v*Â¤ h D- Gt O f E (d 7& , C Y kd 694 1 , 1 2 4 0.'mbe-eâ‚¬) 0 10. ,7(1343Â« 21-60.-1.- ~0'3.416e-vÂ·~ - 0 (con u-Mt (31-,~ k 2_ p 04-c..1.<- 4 cl ) A i . re_e~C~ U b v'U , 0 ~ AL bAO Â» ) Thor,â€ž-- Hou IAAFâ€¢JÂ·-'-, ~-6 Fo~-L~~ L fl,J ~ Q 72 C 4-1JI/'*3 9 CA s 4/Â»\ 2.-36 f~,0,0/+ râ€¢-42+ ~ LA-v-1 j'; art - -{4 cal u/ 5+3,-c to A/.-3.Lk â‚¬,COÂ©-3 . 2-Â· n<j li tk,j--l.Â»&2i~.Dil-~ -ul rElÂ» 3-4 11 flâ€ž~~i? 0 4T7lf1 'F A-2- -Lg .mT. * FLI-j)- Â® M rts,Cl- 8-3 r or, l~.M* . lr'-c--gt,44.-4) 1 Ve-+13* <200 44,1 MAY-11-98 12=21 PM BALBOA MARKET 741 673 3761 P.01 4 -11- -41/ C A U.; 2 6,13 ib # n + v. t.,2.,t e --- _ *.IDâ‚¬F'. ' 8 >Pe *,j P .i-,,47.<1 L. d>k *1 de A-> 77 5 *Â·Â·- No)46 ./J PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 234 W. FRANCIS, HPC CONCEPTUAL, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, VARIANCES, AND FINAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday. May 13,1998, at a meeting to begin al 5 -00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Council Chambers meeting room, basement of City I Iall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Don and Gwcn Mullins requesting HPC Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Variances, and Final approval to dernolish and reconstruct an existing non-historic garage and make other changes to the exlsting structures. The property ts located at 234 W. Francis Streel, Lots K,L, and M, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. The variances are requested to allow for the reconstruction of the existing non-conforming garage, which currently enroaches into City right-of-way, but will be placed entirely on private property when reconstructed. The variances requested are all 8 foot rear yalli vahance, a combined front and rear yard variance of 12 feet 4 inches, and a west sideyard setback variance of 10 feet. For fitrther information. contact Julie Ann Woods at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena Stâ€ž Aspen, CO. (970) 920-5100. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Iiistoric Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25,1998. City of Aspen Account 0: plennIng/aff,L#totices/234wthin.doc O% 73-4/t /BA)45 Lote,15 3 411 10 1 6 FED)0. 303 w. F AnÂ©.25 A Sped, C..6 42 1 Â£ f j -3-dic i =r *ILL Le 647 #F -1- â€¢tu.,> BA> 5-~3399 0 24 3 brpoit --1 ke Â¥-Â·':5~'"7' FoR.. 7.J~ VnRJAÂ·U (A) tod:,6 4 7-1,jut ,-1 15 926Â»JUPL,L Luu}. 71< Fulcke-Jig.5 *Al ~8,9 '18 ZIN:FRop.1; 4 9Â»'sh b., *1. Cr c 4 ftÂ£ a f....77 . 24 F<:.t L -> 4< Nill#hadi-:*i *Mid -f-4 C 1.7-~ ruild. 1.ke-41)? A e .Ed: 7 ' B.k# e Z/-tj<274 r â€¢l~ 96,Â£ 4 62,51 1244* 37-5 -744.a-â‚¬. 4,~ c A k *ce-Â· 9 4 0-0&44 y er -1-114:_ 'Putek.se,2 -1 i. Ptn 'Aj A 13 91.-, 2 t. a.)<-ET : r.../Ir Â£*2, t.â€¢-,r 1 1 *,0 129Â© 0"2 6 34 U C_el,1 6 b.410 t -I - PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 234 W. FRANCIS, HI'C CONCEPTUAL, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, VARIANCES, AND FINAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 13, 1998, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Council Chambers meeting room, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Don and Gwen Mullins requesting HPC Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Variances, and Final approval to demolish and reconstruct an existing non-historic garage and make other changes to the exiging structure#. The property is located at 234 W. Francis Street, Lots K,L, and M, Block 48. City and Townsite of Aspen. The variances are requested to allow for the reconstruction of the existing non-confonning garage, which currently enroaches into City right-of-way, but will be nlaced entirely cn private pronerty when reconstructed. The variances requested are an 8 foot rear yard varianâ‚¬e, a combingifront and rear vard varianctof 12 feet 4 inches, and a west sideyard slback variance of 10 feet. For further information. contact~Julie Ann Woads at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. 20. (970j-920-5100. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25.1998. City of Aspen Account 5--11-99 3-1(,LZE- AWN 1 MY NAMG- IS KA-<EL 16(SLGA . AAM. W /fE- 3063 .*40 / LIVE N â‚¬5*reoe,2- 7)2 7746 MULLMS M- 4-16 N . 564**0. W 5- AWE=- Tb 66*VE 7AwN 7-D/46#894 (~jt<Y (8~ AofLANG , Se WE WAM780 72, 706(04 BAST g: planning/aspen/nouces/234wtran:d 4 (M 7014 71*7 o NÂ»*rs. 06 1*5Nvo F=64* 7*5 M.LAU,fUS W FGalae Avh =r <32 /,v t U..Â·r , ': 13 0 J r /:hA.< 5 03\->t :01- 21- - . :-0 62 1.- C /9 47- ya* g 44#014 625 F+N 6-314'Cr <S.U .1 jAIT-73-% ,+,30 915- WE~W 6-4.â‚¬,467Â£--?1~'~ ''~-~~|0 DRA_ a-45519*?70,95 \Rk/56*] kft:W @blATroMg _ 1~915 UAVE AE,4 96-m,-16571 06- O#VOCTÂ»137!Ct -lz, pe.Med,sk. Ng) 645/6 el~LE:cne,v5 O i. 1Â· 5,3 atic 14. 1 1: e.- f bAL<:r- 1~8/AC7763 1 70 Jt/+â‚¬~--5 4 5-wdP- AND CONst*4 0/CES PF toeâ‚¬ W ) TAO.er NA- Ii'OUE htâ‚¬-0-1,05 LA~}FUL PC# H /137. 15 MWN - PAE? CME 4 19 852~ 9 ,$49 *64271% ~ wftgw CWJ / Ork- you 79 46:r- A P> d Al- 57*T*9 AffeemÂ¥, ( F NM 0 47- @f=77 CUD two l k- 0 2..)61 00,07- Z./AE 0442 496â‚¬ Fi (1_ PO'ISELâ‚¬/ SUFF)2.1565 Â®A- 11 4 (5 'LeDPRE 56*F'FloN FLE*SE CA,% US 7,009 Ar- dr -2,9--69/1 0 WA SUENCEM OR 1/4 Ell 86--ff-gjvlâ‚¬j 69<(GR-19Lopl /(S(->,--17 330#'... \~704 O)DA-r ts]< 71Ub C AND Fae M P ew , 9 trk -\- LAL'U I L 1/4 â‚¬ Al AL /C ' 4 40â‚¬517041 - 61â‚¬k H-oM â‚¬ 5 D.LANKS - Uj -2: 8 94 e ~ PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 234 W. FRANCIS, HPC CONCEPTUAL, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, VARIANCES, AND FINAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that apublic hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 13, 1998, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Council Chambers meeting room, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Don and Gwen Mullins requesting HPC Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Variances, and Final approval to demolish and reconstruct an existing non-historic garage and make other changes to the existing structures. The property is located at 234 W. Francis Street, Lots K,L, and M, Block 48, City and Townsite ofAspen. The variances are requested to allow for the reconstruction of the existing non-conforming garage, which currently enroaches into City right-of-way, but will be placed entirely on private property when reconstructed. The variances requested are an 8 foot rear yard variance, a combined front and rear yard variance of 12 feet 4 inches, and a west sideyard setback variance of 10 feet. For further information, contact Julie Ann Woods at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. (970) 920-5100. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25,1998. City ofAspen Account g: planning/aspen/notices/234wfran.doc r No Recipient, No Sub t To: .@*ausea-0-gtanÂ·43 ullt..4 PJ From: Theresa Albers <theresaa@co.pitkin.co.us> Subject: DEMO PERMIT CC: Bcc: X-Attachments: A Demo permit has been submitted for 234 W FRANCIS ST, owner is GARY MULLINS. The #1 Building permit is ready for issuance so the owner is very eager for this Demo permit. HPC needs to sign off on it. I have made a copy of the Demo permit for you to review. You may e-mail me your response if you'd like. The Demo permit will be in the office of Sara Thomas. The #1 is in our outgoing rack #38 Thankyou. Theresa 130 S. Ghalena ASPEN* PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN--EPARTMENT General Afpen, CO 81611 PERMIT APPLICATION Permit 1 970/920-5090 920-5448 Inspection line PITKIN COUNTY E CITY OF ASPEN [2~ No. ~-49 Uk_ ADplicant to complete numbered spaces only. JOB ADDRESS 1. 13 Â¢ w /':*44249 , r \' Ftly 6-0 el*11 BD LEGAL LOT NO BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION ( C.SEE ATTACHED SHEET ) CO 2. DESC. k LA 40 OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP 77052. 7 pHONE7/3 WZZ lit 0 (Â®7 3. 204> 66*/MN MULL/NE, 4644 *Â¢T- OAK jotÂ«g 02, tuam 144, HwimN TX FD CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS UCENSE NO FN 4. 6*Af *ti+Eace/L Bok 83% Ne/407-- a) gl 61I ~6118 *Â·7 +1Â¥l- h // ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD MAIL ADDRESS 1 1./.L LICENSE NO MH 5. 9190!0 b *44+Ilazi-5 *01 >1 MEL 17,- kippo m ell,ll 4,40 lift*> MS DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO o RF ENERGY CODE FEE USE TAX CENSUS CODE CLASS OF WORK Â· NA 0/ 679~5.Â£1. 7. 0 NEW EADDITION 012rERATION O REPAIR O .- ;W 1 to _ ' l.z. . r 6.-- .,1-7'r- USE OF BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE ,PERMIT FEE ' ZONING FEE 8. */tÂ»iNA l- 1 /7 le :1 9 , UÂ·l. ji /PL 1--4 4.A 2- i LL, 2-r VALUATION OFWORK SQUARE FOOTAGE Type of Construction Occupancy Group ~ Lot Area 9Â· $ 5527, 02254,=al- 10. VN /9 1 Size of Building No. of Stories ~Occ. Load 11. Is there food service in this building O YES O NO (Total Square Ft.) 44/EL 12. Is LPG used? m yEs 40 NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fre Sprinlders Required? ~ Yes U No 13. Remarks EXISXING AD*D /\ 7 Alarm System Required? ~ Yes U No No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES Covered ~ Uncovered SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED , AUTHORIZED BY DATE ZONING ~ ~ r H.PC. / ~ PARK DEDICATION Â« ENVIRO. HEALTH / | C.-3 PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE ENGINEERING : BY 7 ' 8Y BY BY PARKS | 3496 FIRE MARSHAL DATE 1 DATE DATE DATE - WATER TAP ~ NOTICE ASPEN CONSOL SAN. DIST. '4 -SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING. OTHER 1 VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY USE TAX OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. m MONTHLY OR QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS D DEPOSIT METHOD 3.5 % OF 25% OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID AT ISSUANCE. A FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL COST MUST AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT BE FILED WITH IN 90 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PRO- WORK AND / OR ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. VISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO D EXEMPT EXEMPT ORGANIZATION REVIEW THE APPROVED PLANS AND ANY COMMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED THEREON AND SEE THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR PROJECT IS BUILT IN Â£ RESALE: STATE & PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. C \ COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. ANYONE WHO USES AND / OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN PITKIN COUNTY IS SUBJECT TO THE 3.5% USE TAX. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR (DATE) PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND /OR THE CON- SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TAX IS NOT PAID THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED WORK STARTED WITH OUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Energy Code Validation Plan Check Validation Zoning Validation Permit Validation 3.5 % Use Tax Deposit Validation WHITE-FILE COPY CANARY-APPUCANT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT GOLD-ASSESSOR li' JU j - (J. Â£ i .04) 6-*Â·Â· e- e li~.e c- ;E~lE 1 \ 4 i L--Of- f 1 3 f i 0 ) 2< 1 i 1,11 / /1 13 I i / 1 1 f i l 4 . r +-4 6 : *--- LO t '6 64-R--- ll P C 0-Pfrd DCLL .Trt- * 1 CO Ptl? Cf~ ~0Â» /2 uc. 1 6 -L Of t: or' MjÂ« 4 C decy-r O 4 BARY WHEELER CONSTRb.,ION, INC. P.O. BOX 588 BASALT. CO. 81621 Phone (970)927-4551 Fax (970)927-9457 March 30,1998 Ms. Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer The City of Aspen Hand delivered Re: The temporary relocation of the home located at 234 West Francis Street Aspen, CO. Relating to the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020 (D), (3), and (4) of the Aspen Land Use Code and made part of the approval by the Aspen Historical Preservation Commission known as Resolution , series of 1998. Dear Ms. Guthrie, I submit to you, pursuant to the above referenced project and the conditions of approval. the following: Item Number 17.) See site plan labeled as Exhibit A showing building location on property. The building will be raised vertically five feet above existing grade. (It will nQI be moved to any other location.) A new foundation and basement will be constructed and the home will be lowered onto this new foundation. Item Number 18.) See Exhibit B as the detail submitted by Bailey House Movers 3149 B Road Grand Junction. CO 81503 showing the method of micro-lam beams bolted to the existing wall studs to brace and support the Primary and Secondary steel "I" beams that will be used to raise the home. In addition, the general contractor, Gary Wheeler Construction, Inc. will install 4,~8' sheets of plywood on all inside corners of both the main floor and the upper floor for shear strength. Cross bracing at a 45oangle to the inside corners where the plywood will be installed will be added for additional bracing. See Exhibit A attached. Item Number 19.) The general contractor will complete this task. Should you have any questions please contact me at 920- 4280. Sincerely, 1111-7 0 / d(iii Â»47\.-) Vuv-'L- Gary Wheeler Gary Wheeler Construit,4, Inc. 034 u.)es-r fhA,Â£4 9. 8Â·SPEÂ£~ 0, ,< C><,en o 6 Glem,4. CA (221 41: ~43Â·'~ >i R ause J AC , (lstuzLI Â¥%,76(13 3 \ C.21 BELOG /8 0 4 Go /- 0 0, k 1- F7 e 1 *eÂ«ze I &445 7 3 , I \\ c 4 ; - \4 0 A 6 4 r 1 4 K 8/ P(Â£1 .6*j/-3 A < 4,45,2.042 8â‚¬Aa.Al il 1 â‚¬/ Pwo-?VI Q L i A.>9 CK,@e, 4 1 1 0 - 7 -*-11,-- 4 - Â£41 18 iT >4 k sin,j bus-i :46 ' 1 ~ l 5734 L.Â£-2â‚¬sr *tizw 9â‚¬. ~3Be O,5. 't) 4 , Wi 2/ 2- x4 61 u STUD ~ 1-Â·Â¥ 191 'A. .,~~ 1 4// j If 557) >DA RV 1227 Ahâ‚¬,46Â»-L 66 pr-/ < - wAIL- 2 tal 6 0 11-w - 4- \ \ ~ --7 & EUE,2 4 1 STur-1 . 1 1 L 0 16,4-,6.- 0 2 L-'l,c,16 0 6,ze i 22--4 7 -2, %40 \ -- 1 â‚¬' 9>600Â©Datup Ott=.=, 8 ' I - BEA Â»1 lili Y'rf ~ , i a~ mn .7 11 \ 187 1 5-r}Wk- 7-bb~*~ 1 / 24 r 11 i 1 1 - 5 1 / '3234 Â£Â£2 647 r . i 'Â©e~ A __5 6 ,<,sl, 09Â· Oh,AR 4-1--b 40 I .-A . 12- ' r, 67 - 2%4 Ju & b f N 27 fbc'SfiA-2,1 Â£91 5-r, f.~1 4/ 0*4 STUU Stor-NDA /242 IS'Â£ Alite-62*cwu 66*712/~ t---x ' e Â·r- 6.Atil- 2 la-11~ O 1-rl : / 4 EUER-9 5-Tud 1 , -1- C 18) #8024441,Â« 1 1 1 \f 0 2 l,1160 616 3 606201 1#v(~-//, ~ I . Y/21#tt'7 7 7 Nt E â‚¬ 9620 Â©DAL'? "It. Fl~~~~ 1- BER#l % I _ $ 1 I 18,Â£ STEÂ£-4 I Ea-m k a IiI .i d -- 1l - SCALE " U '* l, 6,487(~~' *g Â£zid 1~ . 1- 1 i , TE 1 2 1, 0 3 07.- g , 1 \ ---- 4 - r fili 12 0. ' ./2 1 , f 6 . . a . . Icl. 1 - Ii . . % 1.1 ' 4 rE . .+1:; t ; 1 2 - '1 1.1, . 41'f % 1 . . , r -r ' â€ž k , r#~chcllix >-CIx Lic friA I\#_>~ \\\~1\ 9\\\ 1 \\24: \ \\N \\ 4\,\,\,\ B.\\\\Ul . 1- 21 I. & , 1 9 't ) I .'.4. D A. + 11 1 1 Pr - 1 1 G Â·. 1 / 01 2 t ' Â·9' 0 - 1! ': 1 1 U. r I ./. ill 4,1 0/ ,~ tj . -2 + c. . -- .1 1 / 1 t I. ' , 9f2 1 '1 1 Â· . t.=â€¢Â· ./., i.' -6- *-249*23' ' (-, i 2 , LA ..... 1 , 1, 4 '16=1 . . . r â€¢. 7 ' ./. |I ' & 04' 1 -,1 4., t:r, U , 1 4 5 l. d. '1 ~'. , I. 4, . P 1. ' J - 1 1 .- . '4\ â‚¬ ' Li .- I , xi ' I - -1-7- - , 1 , . '1 ~ 1 . ..2 -1 - i~-Fri.Â·~iT j FL ,ic ~ :L 1, 1 . . 1 -77 ,: ,, '57 1 it'.41,1 1 1. I ,. O- ;j ORâ‚¬ C r 01 -r G ,,S. Â· .~/Â· 4 , I.E...4-2 , '1 -1 - 2,11 ; i 4Att /2-t:. I .2> .437 -â€ž. 4*-- 1 Â» U ,/ /31 +# 0 , 1. /1 h Sib<.<1:2 4 , 0. . 4 1 - - V fir Â· Â· " . H + t,/ ' 2 : 0 g 15 W rÂ© *T 4 14:.tf. ,â€¢61 I . . ,. &, ' ' vt .*f ' Â·,-, 4 , 51 .1. . 4 Pt. 4 4. 1 0 ' ti ' 1 -1... 1 Mp -23 ' ' Â· 1 1- - -11--4- 1,-'. --= 4= 1 1-_ ,â‚¬ A 1 ...3.. 4(1 , 416Â·29,e , 9/Kon. 1.MitÂ¢ Â·.4 Â¢6 AE, - 1 A LLEY 1 20' R.O.W) ------ -Ill---*I------- 4,15Â°09' f E, 3.0.001- - 1 IT. 51Â£ Â· --Ill.-I. . 1/,1 1 I 22,2 : f. 4 8 \LO OK 48 t- N k 1- .4 -1-- LOT K LOT L LOT M , 1 1 ..0' Temporary Historical House D.elocation L \7. 'Â£ 11 Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. , b L. City of Aspen, Colorado O 6 -d f The area shown crosshatched represents the location of I2..' O the existing, historical, wood framed, two-story house. 1 - 1 6. This structure will be lifted vertically approximately six -;y:1 feet. Temporary supports will then be constructed to / i facilitate the construction of a new, poured-in-place, concrete foundation. The temporary supports will then be . 1 fl removed in a prescribed mann 2r to lower the house onto E- Â· ---'A 2 f- .r | the new foundation in a position identical to the original, 'Â·I' -~~e~~~FERHANG - I - L__J . l 1 2% 17 - -. -. Il.j 4 2 20.5' Jr Â« !Ull ll~j/li/ /t// 113 iIl~1 --- - -< 1 10 1.71 0 6 to 1 1 1/2 STORY F RAME . * 1 FLABSTONE -0/~ / WALK i %2 , ~ i W/BASEMENT 4 = 1 6 ZA' r 0-- GZ. --1 / 30.09 30.00' 30Â·Od N. 75Â°09'114 W. 90. od z . X) *-FENCE IN /1 0 Â«Ate- 1 s 1 -O 1/4/ - EDGE OF ROAD -J - FRANCIS STREET (74.72 R.O.W) ... 16 DANN wa \9 A a>Pf oF- A tÂ·*R.Tl-oAJ C)F-- k D)Â«1111Jb fiefRefÂ»JTILJ<2> Aid 11Â«0187*)7- doR>/ef 'Â°1 -rfo#60\ tr 14/ 4*72- /421 62Â«/69%422- , /92, 69. 22*Â« A'Ov te'V --0000*- Sur*Neu NowER 0-8 SITE/RELOCATION PLANT: Mullins Residence, 234 West Francis, Aspen, CO SIDEWALK )11â„¢301 S 100 1 A-, %14 p- . _ < 222. 46.16 L 0146 XP'-7 Â»4 ..ek / -CCU)14\ %*Pat- '24' ~, TT--- - - ----4~ -.- 41- +4- 1 1 X fy/ tz>~~ \ J// I ///9Â«IN AX r k j , 1 / / /Â»tj r - 3% 1 1 #1 2. .. li %*1...2. - /' I.- ....-I' -$- *41 :iN? irm - - j!t-t :~ 41/ Â· .i \Â»10Â« , 1 H # .1 1.i Â· 1," 4 :,ff; 1.1 i - t. - Mig f 11- 9 I i; / / 20691 *LE I 1- . -1 CLOG, l.co477O 405 7- 1 -2= 4 3 U l 47'27â‚¬446 11 *1 - %4450 '4â‚¬25441*~7 1 1 9 19 1016 605 ylÂ£**4,4-2054 (7Z> 0,2 ,4,27122~J#8) 2 fit Jtgrâ‚¬- , IN-*ift:.,1 44 1 /1 , 1 4 < ~-- --f--r- 1 . tls ' 4 70 *4601 4 A,2170 J 1 d 1 L-----442 .p=fLER'L-,725 Mera Derueen 1_it M] -1 /1 A ARS.#advE :ike=,v,52 7 S 11 1 4 Â¢ ~fl: I 6%9:2 (20Â« Â¥ 5707 WALL Ado/% 4 r 1 i 7; *62*+U,d:44 1 , 4 7 1- r -1 4 Â£ 1.- 1 , â€¢ . " N ~ 1 i. ;.... W...,2.2*tf-V, -1~ I .1- '~~ La_m-- - 11 11 Ugâ€¢+791%Â·U- loz*r=O1.le,22. i*Qut Ret A-Pc- +4>PfÂ»+M- 1.2 0Â«123Â«MaN/- ' If ~2 ../ I. -I Â£ Â· .I .-b-42~~ lek*eMENT AREA *<gaeos 1 DOD tb , 771%Aff742 L U647-mall.6 hee- Rlakul}U:Oj .--- 1 .,61:), ... E*iNAT Op ~~---- ?ok.01+ M*Â©412- . - 4 *Ah >Â«Nes 017 Nax , 'ay, +. --- y.+- f~ .* 434<. 1 4--- --- - 1 * 44 1 AX .- e NX'. 10\ . 1 1 141 $ . V , 4 / Ar.9821 - 14 1 490**2 4 3 1111 7- 2 1 1.8 1 i & 2/69%040 #4 -i L Â»L,r# 7 2 1 1 - iet -1 "1 fit . xTÂ·.c.-.--:~.-, B.1 . + 1 4 -- U-----4,4.1 . , - . . . I . ..I.. -*=...=c -Â·r 1 - L .-. I Im=41 . 1 1 , 3.- 1 -31 . 2-2.Ams,+2Â¥EFâ€¢-~~~[Avi ' 1 454 1- I M Z - , ' A /1 1: 1 .1,1,9 \ 1.0 331 - 1 ip f.5 00484 - 4 0- -1,4. @-, U F 1/ 1. fill-~~ /7 \/ It 104 4 i - -4 fr.* 1 - . & 1 1. 1 '11 ' MI E. 652- - ReÂ«EA3-1,0, ) . M :.I pm I ) Â·Â·1-r42 .Â· .9721-- * 1 - 'ttail* . 1 / "%431 op - --t. ti - Cifir wwt- : ii 1:if -2 v. L 1 1. 5., I =:Le - Â»541 *wa 1- 1 1. doG. 100::047â‚¬> N 3. 442 - / 5 2 1 - lili> . -- Â£2 iâ‚¬#-].4Â£19 1 111 A A A -4 1 1 e O 44 Y 05422- /4,-- %241*Â» 1 Â£Â· I 1 570/44~ 11 - b484,< | 1 11 - -64016+J -r Floo A. ~LAN ( AlÂ»'JAE. U&*Tweu_ Â·56-j-lette) - - k t>*141,4 -4/.2/ C l/1 V.G+1.6/f , 6- ,>/1/ U . 14Â«1 a.fa,Â£,1. 1-Â·4-> Â»C**4 ,~All,1 21 264 -~ irel 2*44-160 gitp~0,/U 1 lil/1 U 61 I 1.-7 - 4/2>b' 45>l/kIA 0301 <f Â£ t< li i=g.-\-0 v.110/ be,t/152 -tek 4- k-21(764::, 0 l,1 5)'U~\ 294602,7 - l~ D , 6 144-te 4 4 ) (V f 64 0 p wo v- 6 17,<d*#LT C O l,/7 64&(424 60(/41/22/~0//2 a Â»f + 104 p F.0612/'~f7 <54 400'r â‚¬,v- i /7 . ~4~~ Attp 12-3Â«, - Ug 6 A Ju ugu~~1> LUGICM*&'v--o U r -FAv C_,311 1* I+1-3 9 8 9 1. r /51VUA G ikkflto.5\ Â«10 7-660<*:4. 1Â©Aâ€ž (j L/d 03/17/1998 13:22 303-9207822 STUDIO B ARCHITECTS PAGE 02 i F# 6 9470 \f-La , 94.â€¢J hi.0 6 id 8- architeels 17 March 1998 Amy Guthrie, HPC (}fficer City of Aspen 130 South Gatena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Mullins Project, 234 West Francis Sheet Dear Amy and HPC Members, Please find the enclosed drawing which reprewnts our clients wish to connect the main house with the guest house via an opeit air breezeway. This design element is the result of several contributing factor.. Those bsues i naud e: 1. It shall unite all three elements as a composition while still allowing the guest house and garage to read ab a separate structures. Att three components are currently painted the same cok,; ~elleme md will rernajn ma similar scheme upon completion. The two breezeways Bhal] allow the ple] r.ents to function as a 'whole' both pragmatically and Are key ingredients in the land*:ape pl,w 2 Because the existing guest house is constructed from the same materials, of the santa details, and painted Ihe same as the mam house, an open air trellis does not detract frorn its having its own 0 ideâ€ž f, tv', 3. It rclateb k, the smaller enclosed breezeway between the main house and the garage. 4. It prc,s;idev .1 wc,nderful landscape feature with flowering vines covering the trellis 5. it prnvides a covered walk in the event of inclement weather to the guest housp. 6. It offers privacy into the rear garden court from Francis Street especially in summer months. 7. It elaborates <,n tile existing trellis of 14' that is existing, but is decrepit and collapaing ec Don and Gwen Mullins, Gary Wheeler Iii,1 ... 1 2, Per! Ce 81611 970 920 9428 faâ€¢ 370Â·920Â·7822 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey Halferty, Susan Doddington FROM: Amy Guthrie RE: 234 W. Francis Street, project monitor review DATE: March 11, 1998 Here is a copy of the building permit set for this project, which the two of you are the assigned monitors for. Please hold on to these to use during the construction of the project. I have red lined several things which need your approval. The first two are related to conditions that have been placed on the approval. The last four are new changes. 1. The dormer on the north side of the house has been revised per a condition of approval that said it couldn't extend past the rear wall of the historic house. 2. The porch on the east side of the historic house is to be reconstructed and will have an appearance similar to other porches on the house. 3. Instead of railings, they will use landscaping and/or grates on the lightwells. 4. Louvres to ventilate to the roof are to be installed on the north and south of the old house. 5. HPC approved two lightwells on the east side of the house. A third one has been required by the building department. It is shown at the kitchen octagon. 6. The application showed that the existing garage, which is not historic, was to be remodeled and numerous changes were approved for the building. The owners now want to tear it down and reconstruct it to the approved design. Apparently they feel it is more cost effective than remodeling. Also, they need to pull the garage in five feet from the alley because of trees which will otherwise make it hard to turn into the garage. The architect has also informed me that, for building code reasons, they may need to keep a connection between the house and garage as exists now. Also, they want to have an open breezeway that connects the carriage house and house. I will supply drawings for you to look at when I receive them. Remember that your job as monitors is to try to help resolve issues that come up during construction/plan check, but anything that you feel the whole committee should see will be brought before them. Thanks ! I I MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director 5~)/~61Â»-J Julie Ann Woods. Deputy Planning Director lutj 1 FROM: .Amy Guthrie. Historic Preservation Officer RE: 234 W. Francis Street- amendments to approval DATE: January 28. 1998 - SUMMARY: HPC recently approved a renovation of this structure, which included changes to the garage area and carriage house. a new kitchen addition. and a new basement under tile house. At this time the applicanI wishes to propose other modifications to the carriage house and amendments to their previous approval. The architect has attached a list of the areas for discussion and cited the appropriate sheet on the drawings to refer to in each case. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "ri," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 9% ?342* Â£140: 31Â·10 -44- .ps*~s of *41 6 09 4:14-dk--1 1 VEr Â«1(VU 49* C./ot3Â« Orputud 4-0 Â»60,1 . Response: Referring to the attached letter from the architecI. Staff has no concerns with the following items: the construction of a closet on tile rear of the carriage house (#2), the relocation of a non-historic window on the rear of the carriage house (#3), removal of the non-historic trellis (#4), the substitution of slightly taller double hung windows in the kitchen addition (#9). removal of the non-historic breezeway between the house and garage (#fO). addition ofa skylight on the east side of the house (#12), the addition of a skylight in the kitchen addition (#13). the wall extension at the garage (#14). Interms of the remaining items, staff has the following comments. Items 1.5.6. and 7 all deal with the addition or alteration of porches or porticos on the house and carriage house. On the carriage house. the attached bird's-eve view of the house (Exhibit A), and the 1904 Sanborne Map (Exhibit B) both suggest that there were never porches on the building at all and thar a lean-to addition once existed on the west side of the building. Generally. preservation would avoid adding any features thai did not originally exist on the building. since they change the buildings character. HPC did approve the porch that has been added on the front of the carriage house within the last few years. Staff would agree that it is somewhat -'heavy." but it is simple in it' s form and detailing and makes less o f a design statement than the proposed gabled portico. If the applicant does not wish to keep the existing porch. Staff recommends that it simply be removed and the front o f the structure be thereby restored to its historic appearance. The porch on the west side of the carriage house was added. although not recently. This porch too is fairly simple in form and is in keeping with the overall Iack of decorative detailing on the building. Staff recommends keeping the existing porch or making minor modifications to it. The porch on the east side of the historic house was added, although apparently the door has always been there, along with a transom window. Staff would recommend that the porch could be reconstructed possibly with minor modifications. but its essential character should be mainmined along with the transom window above the door. Staff believes that the porch on the west side of the house is historic and should be maintained in its present form, even after the modification of the roof slope at the back of the house. Item #8 deals with a proposal to change the windows in the new dormers on the garage from double hung to horizontal windows. Staff finds that the vertical proportion of windows used on the rest of the buildings on the site should be maintained. Item #11 is a proposal to add a skylight on the west side of the historic house. Staff is opposed to this modem element on the street side of the building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. Response: The overall proposal is a successful renovation of a group of historic structures which will be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: With the modifications discussed above. the proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: With the modifications discussed above. the proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the following alterations of the approval for 234 W. Francis Street: 1. The construction of a closet on the rear of the carriage house (#2), the relocation of a non-historic window on the rear of the carriage house (#3), removal of the non-historic trellis (#4), the substitution of slightly taller double hung windows in the kitchen addition (#9), removal of the non-historic breezeway between the house and garage (#10), addition of a skylight on the east side of the house (#72), the addition of a skylight in the kitchen addition (#13), the wall extension at the garage (#14) as outlined in the application submitted to the HPC on January 28, 1998. 2. If the applicant does not wish to keep the existing porch an the south side of the carriage house. it should simply be removed and the front of the structure be thereby restored to its historic appearance. 3. The existing porch on the west side of the carriage house should be retained or may have minor modifications to it, to be approved by staff and monitor. 4. On the east side of the historic house the porch should be maintained or may have minor modifications to it, to be approved by staff and monitor. The transom window above this door is to be retained. 5. All conditions of the October 8, 1997 and December 10, 1997 minor development approval must be met. Exhibits: A. Bird's Eye View (1893) B. Sanborne May (1904) C. Minutes of October 8, 1997 and December 10, 1997 D. Application STUDIO B architects 21 January, 1998 MEMORANDUM RE: Jan 28, 1998 HPC Meeting Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. , City of Aspen, Colorado - The following items reflect minor changes from the drawings originally approved by HPC The architects of Studio B, together with their clients, Don and Gwen Mullins, respectfully request approval for these changes. We strongly feel that these items will enhance the entire project. It should be noted that these changes occurred as a result of the natural process of architectural design, a process of systematically reviewing all possibilities over a period of time, in order to produce a product compatible with the interests of all parties involved. a) The existing portico at this elevation was poorly constructed, is not South Fortico at the Carriage House: (See page 3, carriage house) compatible architecturally with the existing carriage house, and is not historical. b) The existing portico is visually incompatible with the character of the estate. c) The proposed entry is more compatible with the carriage house. ~ 2~. Closet addition at the Carriage House: (See page 3, carriage house) a) The clients expressed a need for more closet space. b) The proposed location is in the rear yard and not seen from either street. c) The proposed location replaces an exisdng window which will be reused at the kitchen area. d) The proposed closet reduces heat loss from the habitable space. f 3). Kitchen Window: (See page 3, carriage house) a) It is proposed that the small, existing kitchen window be replaced with the larger existing window described in item 2c. b) Replacing the existing kitchen window enables the occupants of the kitchen to enjoy the privacy of the rear yard. c) The proposed kitchen window is at the rear of the structure and is not visible from either street. ~ 4). Removal of Trellis between Carriage House and Main House: (See page 3, - carriage house) a) The existing trellis is of poor construction and is visibly incompatible with the general appearance and character of the estate. b) If removed, it may or may not be replaced with a more compatible structure, pending review by client, architect and input from HPC monitor. 1 1 Â» 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970-920-9428 fax 970Â·920-7822 54 1(\OVÂ¥- L ASPEN HISTORiC PRESERVATION COMMISbiON MINUTES Of December 10. 1997 MOTION: Roger moved to.approve the temporary on-site relocation of 234 W. Francis St. and lightwells with the following conditions: 1) A letter of credit. escrow agreement, or bond in the amount of 530,000 is to be provided prior to building permit to ensure the safe r'elocation of the building back onto the new foundation 2) The required lightwells are to be on the east side of the house as presented by the applicant. 3) The applicant will salvage if possible all thefoundation stone or re-create as existing. 4) No exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be umoved without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8, 1997. 5) All windows be covered for protection during construction. 6) Any changes or additions to the windows to come before Sta# and monitor. 7) An conditions of Oct. 8, 1997 minor development approval must be met. Motion second by Susan. Discussion: Suzannah stated as a standard condition a detailed description o f the temporary move of the house should be provided. The Board had concerns with the relationship of the grade and the base of the siding. Amended motion: Roger move to amend his motion to include that a detailed descr*tion of how the house will be moved and determining the final location be submitted as condition #8, second by Susan. All in favor Of motion and amended motion. Suzannah relayed that if an issue comes up with the windows it is to be reviewed by Staff and monitor. Susan indicated that she would also like to be a monitor. 4 4~4~). ~~~?ortico at the West Elevation of the Carriage House: (See page 4, carriage a) It is preferred that this portico should match the new portico at the south Elevation. \ A,1~1'1~). Portico at the East Elevation of the Main House: (See page 7, main house) a) See items la & 1b above. b) It is intended by the architects, per the ciient's suggestion, that this portico match the portico described in item 3, that replaces the treilis described in item 5. b) It lS desirable to eliminate the existing transom window above the door, so that the new Portico roof will be accommodated by the existing wall space. 31 7)., Portico at the West Elevation of the Main House: (See page 9, main house) a) Minor adjustments might have to be made to the roof of this structure pending the actual details as related to its construction with regard to the new shed roof at this area. V\0 8). Windows at the Dormers at the Garage: (See page 8, main house) a) The windows have become smaller to accommodate a bathroom and a skylight is requested at this dormer. ~9). Windows at the Kitchen: (See page 6&7, main house) a) The windows shown on the HPC approved drawings are not necessarily the windows that are preferred bv the client. b) Larger windows, more in keeping with the existing windows on the existing main house are preferred. c) The kitchen cabinet layout, which has riot yet been finalized, is related to these windows. v 10).Breezeway between Main House and Garage: a) The client suggested eliminating the roof at this area. b) Elimination of the roof will lend a village or compound feeling to the estate. It is felt that the three. distinct but related structures, will create a more compatible scale to the property. \~\011).Skylight(s) at Gwen's Bath: (See page 3, main house) a) A more in-depth review of the floor plan led to a rearrangement of this area. b) A discreet skylight in the plane of the roof will allow natural light to fill 91 the room. ~~12).Skylight(s) at Don's Bath: (See page 7, main house) a) The same notes at item 11 apply. U 13).Skylight at Kitchen: (See page 6&7, main house) a) It is felt that a skylight located at the peak of the octagonal Kitchen roof will enhance the lines of the roof and the interior space. b) The skyligh- will provide the Kitchen with more natural light. ~ 14).Wall Projection at Stair at East Elevation of Garage: (See page 10, main house) a) This projection is needed in order to provide adequate access to both cars parked in the Garage. - 14 0 ST. g M / R N Â· I * 4447 4/ . 400 \ 8 0 X -- N ,# P L.-81 41#Lik .. \ 0 11 i . 11 18 0 Â£ 1, %12, ga__ )-C 1.1 (b , - 1-1 1.,W / 1 / P Al '1: 12 'ly\. i r 1 1 04.4 1, I Â· 4 - 11 .\; , 1 - ."-_._r i k N .Vt N 4 ~/ , t 0 1, 1 N !11 Ill" 0 1 P !#1 0 - 4 1.. 11 1 j/ 48 --- it '- --- 27 01 1,1 K id i ill ., . 11 f 46 0 0 > 10 /1 . 11 - f.-4 4 0 4 / 0 , 0 | VT, I / 0 V Ll It tX ii -.- : .0 CD 11 - 0 1 A 11 -J r-9 6, Q L, 0 '9 -7-1 0 1 1.- 4. f.7 Fl 6 al Â£-1 ' 11 4 l'A' ~ liff 1 /1 R L 34 / M. . 0 21 94 414 rfil AD . 1.1 . 1....1 . -- 1.1 , -. 1 , -\ /1 i . k.pi 0 1 211 / F .\1 1 0 1 L"L 17X 13/1 0, B. 401 409 . 40'1 409 4II 62 " ,It , ....6 0 11 & 85 *2 - N. 21.J ST. D AL - - " PUW i' _0 11 4 4. -6. 11 0 400 4}1 410 412 ,Â®2 0 1 0 t 11 1.-48-li 196 A Ka--4 - b-- 1, .1 11 F 1 11 1 n . v * 217 04 'â‚¬231{ 410,I{a~LI. .' ' 4/li:/9~fgH< - .. . 1 - 111 4.'f h - - <.7,44~ f k . -, 71..' 1 , 1, 1 lt~.M'' k ., ir//diu#.4 . 47--- A â‚¬ lA ... " 1. 111 -1 1- --=SZ' 1 . 1111'-' . Al:31//ilpt. - ' 9 --A I' Ch v - ./ I - --4 , --r-2- 21 01 1 f .4 ... â‚¬. - C.4322 - 9~'~3#AÂ»~ ~ f Uf N .4 4 , -, I - - ..L,-37,1#*~ 1/ 56'I ti,Â«1.h !1.,42 .1 .1 .Ijb.<t . - -VtÂ¥ .*/11 /*,' c:-6 C- 1-1/*/4.1.'-*4 . 4-- A-3,4#A'-- -- 6. "'-4'le AILL.F -1--- E---- - /1, 4./. i L.2,/,IC ,-5 -/I.--T - 29Â¢'. JLQUQ'.:1 1 1 -vy;~n -Â·u-- "=<3Â·W'2==-&2' *'4~5 ~-12432K~~~M"thL. 21 T -pre F ' I P.2*4.- k- -U ,--4 - 633~ t~-'~04Â«_fv~'4~1â‚¬'~ /1 2 - I ./.2 . .8 / =--==m 25\,6Dll Â£0'1~'I '*.,e.J 241 â‚¬ - L-I -1' -6,6, /6/(4 ,<Elâ‚¬ht -4. -2,27Â£754- :-3.:12:.L=~ 9-*U- -44*~â‚¬21%3 r,1 - 9-2DZ- -. ' - 7,0â€¢Fl~" 66- I if. 1â‚¬ 'F 'i~%Â» -. ..."hÂ· - . 11'111 . 1 11 , -. .... i / â€¢ -r-- ..*1 10. *er ,2-,-/ ..in-2.1/*53/r //- W.L _ - ./Tr -- - -:12% 2 â€¢4 - 2.. v //2-- Â·r J' ' .... f i. -- I. 'I -1. 1 , r=-/7,/0& t --Â£.U'.&8941-Â·4 Af. '' .t. //1 I ./.1'-'N. M &.r -1 -I , -- 2 14.1 <3# '1* , 1 Natiww-* . 13Â«531 - ,.re.**2~. r; & 4 41 - - A.-Zi A. - * 2 - a,Â· -ti> 4617 -I Â¢-T@ i gic?% I -- ... . 29-y- '/Al Z~OF- 4 ' &/--2 2Â·, Â·. - - .â‚¬4.--Li/:' :-- ..,ae- -.,\ - 1 - 4--*Â·UJF-7 .*363-3--.*14.-*12%#ir - -- ~ -~1 1 ~ . *#.-:I ...e - :r- I 13.-* 1 : ro ~~43~---JO~ :~~Â® Â·. ~ = _%2 2% b: 0 Â¢ - - / 0-,/9-1 -il - - ./M ./'/1/ft/9.. *35 -3 -1 '. ....7M.+6=Efut 4 Ff r â€¢C . - r . - - 0- J ..'lili...I-'=- 1. 1 9/ . - 4 -. - -1-42 r-9-=6> 2-21 . .. ~.211, k ' 521. .Â»=REâ‚¬5:214Â· .43>3-/./.42'Â»~ *:581*Elt... , :Nrij:lit. 1/* '1, 7â€¢â€¢ E-J.& - mrÂ·â‚¬~m~- - -1.--7 -..3Â¥:?PS~ 1 ,-5 I.. I 1._:41 Li*~ , AV - 2-'tÂ·-,5-:.- . r Er- * 62 * 4%72= Â·. ' 4 - - - -..=..,Â©~cOEÂ·1 x - Â¢2442 2.:93.19%29-7 rgL_.inAgjUj~b~*19*44*YVIV=f-=2619 -5.- - t-'20Â¢ â€¢%30 2 0-c - - -1-- 5 4 72 39.4 4 ASPEN HISTOK1C PRESERVATION COMMI,SION MINUTES OF January 28. 1998 structure. The variance would be seven feet. Lowering the eave height works well with the design and a better relationship with the existing building. The east elevation is pulled together quite well. Some members had concerns with the proportions of the south elevation in that it is too horizontal and too busy. Staff has concerns.with the dramatic departure from the historic house. The representation o f the old materials is very well done. Visually the tower will be recessed from the glass. MOTION: Heidi moved to approve the conceptual developmept setback variance and partial demolition based on the new plans as submitted (Exhibit ID for 232 E. Hallam. Restudy the proportions of the south elevation. Motion was second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried 7-0. 234 W. FRANCIS ST. AMENDMENTS Scott Lindeau, architect Arthur Yuenger, architect Amy Guthrie relayed that half of the proposals are alternations to things that were already approved and half ofthe proposals are new revisions. On the carriage house the proposal is to remove the roof and replace it with a gabled roof porch. Staff is opposed to the change as the original building had nothing on the front of it. The court yard elevation faces the house and the proposal is to remove the flat roof trellis that his not historic and replacing it with a gabled roof and staff is opposed to that change. The shed roof dormer on the back o f the carriage house has been approved and instead they want a closet addition and move over a set of windows. On the historic house a kitchen already has been approved and they are asking in addition to make the windows more vertical. On the courtyard elevation they want to take the porch off and put on a gabled porch and staff has concerns with the removal of the transom window in order to accomplish that. A skylight is proposed on the street side and staff recommends against it. On the street side there is an enclosed area that 3 ASPEN HISTO -C PRESERVATION COMMIc,oION MINUTES OF January 28.1998 links the house to the garage and they are asking to open it up into a creezeway again to add light. Another change is on the windows of the garage. The chair reiterated that there are three buildings on the site. Scott indicated that the proposed gabled porticos were designed to shed snow away from the doors. A skylight is proposed in the kitchen. Commissioners concerns: Carriage House - Portico on the Street side should be very simple and have a flat roof or taking off. Gabled roof too formal for the structure. The change to the closet is appropriate. Gabled portico takes the building into a different realm. The portico should not mimic what is on the historic house. Some o f the HPC members felt that the 14 issues were not minor amendments and the entire application should have been presented all together instead of three different segments/meetings. Roger relayed to the Board that snow load issues needs to be addressed and the board should have a worksession. The majority of the board recommended arestudy of all the gable ends to be flat. Removal of the trellis is appropriate. Garage: Vertical windows are acceptable. House: Retain transom window. Geometry of dormer restudied. Skylight on courtyard OK Restudy portico No skylight on west but OK on east. Skylight in kitchen OK Oppose skylights on historic structure 4 ASPEN HIS RIC PRESERVATION (010 [SSION MINUTES OF .Ianuary 28. 1998 Scott indicated thar he would like to rebuild the porticos that are existing with a slight slope so that the snow falls off. MOTION: Heidi made the motion to approve the amendments to 234 W. Francis St. with the following conditions: 2,3,4,7,9,10,13 and 14 of the Jan. 21,1998 memo. Rejected 8, 11 and 12 ofthe Jan. 28th memo and to restudy 1,5 and 6 of the January 28th, 1998 memo. Conditions of Jan. 28, 1998: see attached. All conditions of the Oct. 8th. 1997 and the Dec. 10th, 1997 mthor development approvals must be met. Oct. 8, 1997 conditions: MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve the proposal for the minor development, partial demolition of 234 W. Francis St. with the condition that the applicant look at revising the rear stair dormer so that the wall aligns with the building wall below and that more research be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house to be approved by sta#and monitor. second by Roger. VOTE: Passed 4 - 3. Yes vote: Gilbert, Roger, Mark, Suzannah. No vote: Mary, Melanie, Heidi. Dec. 10, 1997 conditions: MOTION: Roger moved to approve the temporary on-site relocation of 234 W. Francis St. and lightwells with the following conditions: 1) A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond in the amount of 530,000 is to be provided prior to building permit to ensure the safe relocation of the building back onto the new foundation. 2) The required lightwells are to be on the east side of the house as presented by the applicant. 3) The applicant will salvage ifpossible all the foundation stone or re-create as existing. 4) No exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be removed without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8, 1997. 5) All windows be covered for protection during construction. 5 ASPEN HISTOttiC PRESERVATION COMMI~ION MINUTES OF January 28.1998 6) Any changes or additions to the windows to come before Staff and monitor. 7) All conditions of Oct. 8, 1997 minor development approval must be met. Motion second by Susan. Amended motion: Roger move to amend his motion to include that a detailed description of how the house will be moved and determining the final location be submitted as condition #8, second by Susan. The motion of January 28, 1998 was second by Roger. All in favor of the Jan. 28th, 1998 motion and conditions ofthe Oct. 8, 1997 and Dec. 10, 1997 meetings, motion carried. Continuation of Jan. 28th minutes. For clarification no changes to the historic house except one window which was previously approved. Motion: Suzannah moved to adjourn: second by Mary. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 6 .. STUDIOI~ architects 21 January, 1998 Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Committee City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Jan 28, 1998 HPC Meeting Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy, Please review the following HI'C package as requested that depicts both the previously approved HPC drawings as well as the newly proposed. There are several minor changes to both the carriage house, main house, and the garage from the previously approved drawings that have resulted from the standard design process. All of the changes in our opinion enhance the strength of the project, both historically and architecturally. The details and changes are more coherent and consistent because more time has been spent in comparison to the drawings typically submitted in a design development package to the HPC. I have also enclosed a memorandum that details every minor change to all three project components. Please call me with any questions. Best Regards, f \ Â¢ - \~h Scott Lindenau, Architect. 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 8161 1 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 STUDIO I architects 21 January, 1998 MEMORANDUM RE: Jan 28, 1998 IiI?C Meeting Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado -. The following items reflect minor changes from the drawings originally approved by HI?C. The architects of Studio B, together with their clients, Don and Gwen Mullins, respectfully request approval for these changes. We strongly feel that these items will enhance the entire project. It should be noted that these changes occurred as a result of the natural process of architectural design, a process of systematically reviewing all possibilities over a period of time, in order to produce a product compatible with the interests of all parties involved. 1). South Portico at the Carriage House: (See page 3, carriage house) a) The existing portico at this elevation was poorly constructed, is not compatible architecturally with the existing carriage house, and is not historical. b) The existing portico is visually incompatible with the character of the estate. c) The proposed entry is more compatible with the carriage house. 2). Closet addition at the Carriage House: (See page 5, carriage house) a) The clients expressed a need for more closet space. b) The proposed location is in the rear yard and not seen from either street c) Ihe proposed location replaces an existing window which will be reused at the kitchen area. d) The proposed closet reduces heat loss from the habitable space. 3). Kitchen Window: (See page 5, carriage house) a) It is proposed that the small, existing kitchen window be replaced with the larger existing window described in item 2c. b) Replacing the existing kitchen window enables the occupants of the kitchen to enjoy the privacy of the rear yard. c) The proposed kitchen window is at the rear of the structure and is not visible from either street. 4). Removal of Trellis between Carriage House and Main House: (See page 3, carriage house) a) The existing trellis is of poor construction and is visibly incompatible with the general appearance and character of the estate. b) If removed, it may or may not be replaced with a more compatible structure, pending review by client, architect and input from HPC monitor. 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970-920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 5). New Portico at the West Elevation of the Carriage House: (See page 4, carriage house) a) It is preferred that this portico should match the new portico at the south Elevation. 6). Portico at the East Elevation of the Main House: (See page 7, main house) a) See items la & 1b above. b) It is intended by the architects, per the client's suggestion, that this portico match the portico described in item 5, that replaces the trellis described in item 5. b) It is desirable to eliminate the existing transom window above the door, so that the new Portico roof will be accommodated by the existiqg wall space. 7). Portico at the West Elevation of the Main House: (See page 9, main house) a) Minor adjustments might have to be made to the roof of this structure pending the actual details as related to its construction with regard to the new shed roof at this area. 8). Windows at the Dormers at the Garage: (See page 8, main house) a) The windows have become smaller to accommodate a bathroom and a skylight is requested at this dormer. 9). Windows at the Kitchen: (See page 6&7, main house) a) The windows shown on the HPC approved drawings are not necessarily the windows that are preferred by the client. b) Larger windows, more in keeping with the existing windows on the existing main house are preferred. c) The kitchen cabinet layout, which has not yet been finalized, is related to these windows. 10).Breezeway between Main House and Garage: a) The client suggested eliminating the roof at this area. b) Elimination of the roof will lend a village or compound feeling to the estate. It is felt that the three, distinct but related structures, will create a more compatible scale to the property. 11). Skylight(s) at Gwen's Bath: (See page 5, main house) a) A more in-depth review of the floor plan led to a rearrangement of this area. b) A discreet skylight in the plane of the roof will allow natural light to fill the room. 12).Skylight(s) at Don's Bath: (See page 7, main house) a) The same notes at item 11 apply. 13). Skylight at Kitchen: (See page 6&7, main house) a) It is felt that a skylight located at the peak of the octagonal Kitchen roof will enhance the lines of the roof and the interior space. b) The skylight will provide the Kitchen with more natural light. 14).Wall Projection at Stair at East Elevation of Garage: (See page 10, main house) a) This projection is needed in order to provide adequate access to both cars parked in the Garage. . 610* 21 19* I /6.- - -17 1 / 29-- }L --- -1 X -- U -- ~ f_ 4- - . Â«>e/n-1 $1-24 ATI O }J : 6,4Â«1 A*ES +louÂ·*a *096,1- lel,26/A77O N . 4~~Aee AOUSE 11;f. tuoÂ· 14% 1-' o' ~ME l/le>U St-H AFF,20Â·JiLD 1 1 7 â€¢ 1 4 - 6-----I----Ill-$-- 11 tlew P~#44#RÂ· - 1 r ' h i I 1 \ T .le 6 - - 1 -r-- 1 (i- --7 % 0- 7- 0 4- -5--7 ----lt- O K ~-T--8 --- G A R K C A 6 @ Ho v f 6 fAE Vi o u Juq ..l AFfeD JG D 4. Removal of Trellis between Carriage House and Main House: - 9 Weit cleer 1 +Mag + 1 1 1 r 1 1 : 1 1 11 91* . 1 1 :11 '11 11 1 1 . L_ 'Iii 1 1 1- . . T i i , i'' i'FT-1 1 A--71 .1 11!.:111!111 111 A-Z 1 1,11!111111 lili -Ul-- HE*, i I' l~Til |//1|I lilli I 'MT 21---7-7-, -r 1.1 11 7--JL A/' *1/75 32M:*E /2 ~LL 1/1111 'Ill -- 4-1â€ži - I I I.' L-1_1_L .i -7471T1T-,ATLL~LT Â«.// txlt 1*M 50*LND . \i V \ ill' 11 1 11 \ . / /2- \ V//7 / N.1-7-11 'll - --- , -JuffÂ«- - -- i '- 11 1 1 i 11 -- -- -- - ------ 4 1 1 1-0 - --- fi 1 - -i iii r-- --- -- 1 1 I 11 -11 1 1 1 - 11 . 1 1 11 ~ i , 1 1 i ~1-------T 1 1 Â· ~ 1 LL - 1--U W,NOoN AT ExtÂ·5Â» A--- - - L -- 4---- 1 d,Â·6605714*5.6- -1 1 i 1 1 1 1. South Portico at the Carriage House 1 1 1 P,r 0-- -7.7 j Propo_le-d_South~_Elevation: Carriage House jil Proposed West ' 1/ tir-oÂ· 1.--7 - 11,6 1 L o. .1 r 1 6 9-~M 1 1 1 -- . - 1 -4 -F- + 2- I Li- - 4,31 -4 52 --- 1--2- r- 1 - Â· 1 T ~ ~-*-9-t~->3% 1 thkj r h * f it ef iii lili / 1-1 ; 1 11 11 1 / 1 1 1 1 /1 -1- Â£ T 00 1 11 1~ \ 1 1 1 i Â· 11'rl# / It' . 1 ! 111 6 . 4 r . h -Tr- 1 . 1 1 A * 2 86 1 10 1\ O / -- 4.44=44-66 -- 1-- Â« 11 23 r-i_-4 111 Cm & i 1 1 11146 4 1-_2 ---7 1 1 1 11 71.-7 E-,1-r NT - '17=I-IT- 99/ 1,1 1---3[.11 =Elli 1Â¢=1 [-------- 7( 11 1 >%*1 11 1 1 1 O W ft W 11 -9 //10\ 0 C A K - I ------ILL-i~-- - - - -- 1, 1 33 1 fD 11 1 1 1 , k. T 0 13 44* F# 9 *9 117/ W* mt 0 lit j:4; i~:4444: â‚¬2 1% Slollill. architects ~ 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 303Â·920 9428 fax 303Â·920Â·7822 asnoH 392!1112) :U-0!JUAa asnoH 8%111 4. Removal of Trellis between Carriage House NE.w 61.04121- ADAnoN and Main House: 2 . \ AEW Ul/7-06 3. Kitchen Window 1 2 6/929 0 /Â«*M // 1 Re#ERÂ»EED 111 If lili :!1'11. 1 111 , 111 1 3 ble-94| pogn/0,9 -- Â·*Eigr j*;SEâ‚¬7* **:05/ ~.~ EUEVAy?046 1% - 7 - ~1 /2.- --- --- --- 1 --1 - 1 .-- 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 ---- - 1 -- + -- 4 2, i 1 1 1 1 i ,\ 1 C i 1 1 --1 1 1 F L__ 1 - ,*Sm:>le ,Â£5Â¤:56~' ~ ~ En W//25106'' ,*290**E:E- 1 1 1 1 I - Â«092$5&* PMPMAÂ¢W /*6*54*52 0 KAZZ- ah<90 1 r J. L ,- 2 1 1 1 +5*er %Â£27/77Â£:u . 1 4 OF NEW WINE)ow - - 10 N.14*) 01 <ts OF EAMTÂ· . 2. Closet addition at the Carriage House /~ ke/Â»1/0 OvME 09â‚¬L // 1 - -1----- - - NEW FEUVDA77â‚¬*/ WA,1.9 Â«- -- 09# Â»EW /C217551/&4 _ 7 -7 - _'-- - .- .--_u L_-_ -1/ 24,-16 4~,4 t j $ I . JAN 2 1 1998 \ 8KIAM/.- -WH, -41Â¢14<- - fi0-#6152~WjfMkl_______-Â» -7-2210ALIFMWI*#2#22 -11 . 1 .. - -4 11L- 11- 11 111.~ 01 2 'L--*- 11 _419\nÂ¥_t 9,081+ rP-f ---- - - MMTâ€¢t cp,ri,n,F-11,r -j - -- E n - ~- .-jill- . 14 - - 11Â¢,FÂ¢ 1 -- 0 l fALE S 1 -4 PREV,ev 1.--4. /\Pe/lou,2/D . 1 1 - I # t .~ tiPW- 'MlÂ¢18. I - - 12.. -- - --Wdlf_0*@k \ - 1 11 1 \i I ,{Ma__Fice,Dl~ //h / 947-4 6 1 11 44-EN<Â« \\Â» $\Â»44:4 I. PT=Â«ff// 1 f , ... 1 1 7 , - - Xviepa 9 -- 2 -1 \ 4- N - 19= 1 - 1 1 90 - C \~%> - a "-2, I 7. - 1 4~X 0 -* 1. 0 0 . f 1 ll 1 2 - 1 6 - 4 9-_ T - --f 5 -1--- 6 y. ---A-- T. 1 0 M --_ 1 - -6- . 9 f . r#Â£~a ~- 96.,7 - t 1 1 1 i u \. .. / I 1 I . . 1#fÂ»t#0 _96Â¥â€¢y 1 1 * : 1 . 1 /" 1Ell-#-Limi- 7-23*21ifIEILIELE--- ----1-/---~SE/3/~771*-1---*----33- ~fi + + J * --44 1-0 4,6 AitÂ·-r. ijii"/1 Rifs,... Of ., fl 1 4 1 1 31... 1. ff 1-t-i- t - - - - - Voi,94 44 - 4(Al~_61OM#,Lt PIFiBE JAE_ _m(*17* 18EW198]POW --3232-*- < i '7 t1501 __ - - 0 F- ' - -- C - , . 1 1 1 1 1 - -- .r r-- - - ... 24 1 1 11.,4 1 1 -1-1-1 1-i li!1 --- ~ // ---f~ 1- 7-- 0 , ---1-21"/8/294#TRAIM, 44 . - -- - 1 1 =2=1~1#P - l -lim-WHipow __ 1 ! b i j . , 1 - /7 ' e 1 1 1 1 I f---------4.IMEW_ W_weekyÂ»VÂ¢?k Â«===-~ 1 1 1 o- 0 1 1 1 1 1 8 | 01â€¢4"*4 F,QM F>us;7104, MaRat .JQMÂ· 11.- 71/Z i ------ 320 Ali5 9. Windows at the Kitchen Lf-* 4 \N V. Â· 1 -a ..27 . \f\\\> 1 lL - 1 <- - 656/512495 Viklialil IN E><19'6 [Â»EAnoN 1 - - 1 4, '3 - - r- * UL Â· . <% - -* . --- --+--- --.- - -- 14- 1 - 15- -# C 129/4 Tut,5 2.00= :LDIDE - --- 1 1 r -,1, , - -- U \JeRM M.-1254. C>ts WAUM N 6 40>21:k= AE... 6.NU-4.*a 009' f . --lit-~Â·-. ;,ihf-) r--91' -W-PI . J % r r 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1. --1- 1-- 4---- -i~ ----- - - - M - 1 1 4- 1 . r 1 - 12. Skylight(s) at Don's Bath: 6. Portico at the East Elevation of the Main House: 9. Windows at the Kitchen: Ii-hil /,// f , 1. . / 1 1 1 1 24 ~i i 1, 0- Â¥#NO:AN *# 50,2 A,Ar--4 r- ~ 7 Â£5Â«Al,beae- Pa,6e 3Â«1 / \EAFY NE+J '425â‚¬1/4 -- //: l .jÂ»*LP 2~hÂ»,42 < 264'00/Â£2 Wir NOT- LÂ»YOJ *404*t .4 \\.P.C. . \ 9934 /74 1 * I -9 . .1 1 - ./ 1â€¢00-<:PE>cal# FL /9/4 Â» P < -(UNE -OP NEN FL 1 0-1 2 1 41 1 - 4-. -- L L Eul-----j~~ -1-1-1_in f k 4 1-:If )1 LJNÂ·' 7)111. - ..6-4-3Â£-1 -e~ vi .(,2 *Bul A-: 7- 1% : 48'1 ,1 yt. 3-1 I+l i Â£ HU--Â· r.. 1 11 1 - 1 1 1 fEUA 3174 - 1 A - .41 1 1 , :4 1 1 E j' 1 , in i i d 'L- h'-/ f- -4 1 1. . wil...,ti 1 1 A 1 3 j ~m 0Â£?7'*/ 12 1.1 1 , 11*gul #97701 6 1 1 .. 1 = -- 4 -2 - ----17' F-Â·4401- tut- - -~II-- I -I.---1 ~Wj- W-u-ull.~-~~j- A -i--~~- - 1/964#-7-- 32-3- ;57 //2-Zzlv 0-0 r / " , , y 44/10" --- --f------ ----- -------- ---- -- + --- --- 8. Windows at the Dormers at the Garage 1 , 14%44 DDRBEF.5 --------- ----. h -1 \ 9- 4%\ T i i n *$25 g=. i D*42,2. AT IÂ· 4 u Â· 442*zeÂ»wy y Â»LaN a,zzÂ»â‚¬ -ri~, 1 ~ 1 (*74;syN Aou*Â© 1 1 - *AM-1 4 1 V ----, .7 ir- hi -El j --4 0 1 1 .1 9.9 /49 - I i 0 00 | 1 /7,09/0 . 1/~ a*.. d Afum:) 87*Â« \Â»hÂ¥1 ' 1 10&81 ) 2$. -6l 47 ME*Ff ~*AU-<62- : Nf,-111 125,2-9 Polot-.i Â«>'532+FE' 3-\,9 -749/9 110 1.-O.1 i 4 . . 9 - 1 . ' A l // /ZE==53/~--30, / /.94 7 -9.2Â»4 : 1\ 1 . /,527/ : \1 1 \/ My, / / 11 . 111 . , . / --- ,--- --- -- - 11 - ---- --24 , 11 1 1 --- 1 ! 1 1 1 . 4 r ' 61 1 :i 1 -220 8- 1,1112- 0Â¥~ = muffc' FL 0%2:46 2/6. il 1 1 1 *i = 1 -- - . 1, . i / fE-1 .1. , j - b.=22 1 . 2. ' 44 / 2.2 : ,07*017:2*/ 02*46 ' 1 7% tle H, WEO 1 1 1 1-j $ 7. Portico at the West Elevation I of the Main House: Â¥V I 1 ! 1 91--IJE r - 14. Wall Projection at Stair at East Elevation of Garage -<.'/6/ - -1 -~ . 2 5- 5 X\ 4 / i. 5... lit... ~ 3. 1. Ne#,1 4JIN Do#15 't**t:*0 --- 1 1-4 \ r + 1 : - -24 1 1 1 Â·t--4- - 1 =====- Â·-4- 1-4 - -4 1 1 1 4 -Ill 1 -1 1 1 1 I 1 1 . Â»Â»7-- te-LavA,-7 o /4 WaÂ«I- al--aVAT/- 06) Â·Ilf- ILO., tiltrs /.- 0. - BIC : I - . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF December 10. 1997 provided which is open at the base about 3 1.2 feet out to provide access by the Fire Department and still provide shelter. Motion: Jeffrey moved to approve the fuel tank shelter at 1080 Power Plant road as proposed: second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. Heidi did not vote. TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES - VESTED RIGHTS - PH - Amy Guthrie relayed to the board that the application is requesting a three year vested rights. Fred Smith was present to answer questions. No questions. MOTION: Roger moved to approve Resolution 48, 1997. vesting righrs for the Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows, second by Mary. All in favor, motion carried. Jeff did not vote. 234 W. FRANCIS - UGHTWELL AND TEMPORARY RELOCATION One exhibit. Amy Guthrie, City planner stated that the request is to raise the house and excavate a basement below. In addition they are requesting a temporary relocation and light wells to service the space. Staff recommends that the light wells be placed away from the street. Scott Lindeau, Studio B represented the owners Don and Gwen Mullins. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF December 10. 1997 A new sandstone facing is being proposed. The existing house will be raised up 6 feet. Art Younger, Studio B indicated that they might have to move the house horizontally depending on the condition of the exiSIing garage structure in the alley. Thai structure might be demolished and reconstructed and staff had no concerns about the reconstruction of the garage. Scott stated thar an extensive landscape plan is proposed for tife court yard. Discussion of light wells. Art stated that two light wells are proposed on the WeSI side facing the Street with a gram over them. The Board relayed thar their preference was to have the lighz wells on the - east side because they did not want light wells facing the street. They would need a variance on the west side if light wells were approved. The Board also relayed concern about the old glass being broken in the . move and it should be protected. Scott indicated that the windows might have to be replaced due to the energy code. Amy relayed that the windows should be reviewed on an individual basis and they are not part of the review. Roger suggested that historic windows should have plywood over them for protection. Suzannah relayed to the applicant that if there are window changes and screen issues they need to come back to the board. Art relayed that some of the windows have screens on them. 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF December 10. 1997 MOTION: Roger moved to approve the temporary on-site relocation of 234 W. Francis St. and lightlvells with the following conditions: 1) A letter of credit. escrow agreement, or bond in the amount of 530,000 is to be provided prior to building permit to ensure the safe relocation of the building back onto the new foundation. 2) The required lightwells are to be on the east side of the house as presented by the applicant. 3) The applicant will salvage if possible all the foundation stone or re-create as existing. 4) No exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be removed without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas thatwere approved for remodeling on October 8, 1997. 5) All windows be covered for protection during construction. 6) Any changes or additions to the windows to come before Sta# and monitor. 7) All conditions of Oct. 8. 1997 minor development approval must be met. Motion second by Susan. Discussion: Suzannah stated as a standard condition a detailed description ofthe temporary move of the house should be provided. The Board had concerns with the relationship of the grade and the base of the siding. Amended motion: Roger move to amend his motion to include that a detailed description of how the house will be moved and determining the final location be submitted as condition #8, second by Susan. All in favor of motion and amended motion. Suzannah relayed that if an issue comes up with the windows it is to be reviewed by Staff and monitor. Susan indicated that she would also like to be a monitor. 4 4- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission , 9 C Jkj j THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director---dir- Juiie Ann Woods. Deputy Planning Director'â€ž\,l:v, 9. FROM: Amy Guthrie. Historic Preservation Officer - ~ RE: 234 W. Francis Street- temporary relocation and lightwell DATE: December 10, 1997 SUMMARY: HPC recently approved a renovation of this structure, which included changes to the garage area and a new kiIChen addition. The applicant wishes to excavate a basement below the existing structure. which requires HPC approval for temporary relocation. In addition. lightwells are proposed for light and egress from the basement space. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullins. represented by Studio B Architects. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: No temporary relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, established pursuant to Section 26.76.090, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay District. shall be permitted unless the temporary relocation is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(F). F. Standards for review of temporary relocation. No approval for temporary relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the standards of Section 26.72.020(D)(3) and (4) have been met. 3. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of Withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: A letter has been submitted by Patillo Associates Engineers to verify the structures suitability for relocation. 4. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure. site preparation and ; infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: The building is IO be raised Approximately 6 feet vertically from its present location. It will be supported there on I-beams while the basement is excavated. Staff recommends that a letter of credit. escrow agreement. or bond be provided in the amount of 530,000 to guarantee the safe replacement of the building onto the new foundation. The applicant shall provide information as to the current appearance ofthg foundation. This appearance must be retained or recreated when the building is set back in place. Please note that the applicant intends to separate the building walls from the tloor plate and construct a new floor. Again. trim boards or any other features in this area must be retained and put back in place. As a general comment. the applicant must be aware that no exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be removed without the prior approval o f HPC. excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8. 1997. ORDINANCE 30 Lightwells: All areaways. lightwells and/or stairwells on the street facing side(s) of a building must be entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion of the building facade which is closest to the street. Response: The applicant has provided site plans which indicate two possible solutions to meet the light and egress requirements for the basement. One scenario shows the lightwell on the west side of the building, adjacent to 2nd Street. This location requires a variance from the Ordinance 30 standard stated above. The second alternative shows two smaller lightwells on the east side of the building, which do not require a variance and will not be easily visible from Francis Street. Staff recommends this plan be approved. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the temporary relocation of 234 W. Francis Street and lightwells with the following conditions: 1. A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond in the amount of $30,000 is to be provided prior to building permit to ensure the safe relocation of the building back onto the new foundation. - 2. The required lightwells are to be on the east side of the house as presented by the applicant. 3. The applicant shall provide information as to the current appearance of the foundation. This appearance must be retained or recreated when the building is set back in place. Trim boards or any other features in this area must.be retained and put back in place. 4. No exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be removed without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8, 1997. 5. All conditions ofthe October 8, 1997 minor development approvdt must be met. ATTACHMENTi LAND USE APPLICATION FuRM 1 Projec-* Flame ~04222,M/:F *VWATDA 2. Projec: location 2194 '0535;70- ,984/VO/5 :575*ME;'- 4,973; M, 4 fyf 1 - Wtoot- 46 ) pe PEN 60 (indicate street address, lo~and block number or metes and bounds description) 1 3. present zoning R& 4 Lot size 9*:22 *2. ,,E i 5. Applicant's name. address and phone number Z:bvfEBELER,/' /5,WÂ·4>1/5 101.5 Pol.rbAK PL>Â¢:e DANS) 4,UTE 144- HOUSTON 7X 115-611.-146lt 1 1 6. Representative's name. address. and phone number Â£5*F >056*EY.EM MA,Â©A) f Mo#58 3 121 MIOUU) Ma ) 04â‚¬14- 60 * 14 91,P %4,1- * t \ 7. Type of application (check all that apoly): i Conditional Use Conceptuai SPA Conceptual HPC ! Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8060 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Strieam Margin Final PUD v-* Relccation HPC Subdivision Text/Nlao Amend. Historic Landmark i GlviCS allotment GMCS exemption Demo/Partial Demo ~ View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee ~ Adjustment ' 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sc. ft., number of bedrooms. any previous approvals granted to the progath 7WO moo- 82,442 *LOM*5: 4 3110:t 42. Fl: , Lt Ne- PAN>fla- RE4319ek:a Â© Gat)19. PrÂ· , i iNK O.â‚¬R.14,e- NodÂ·52 9. Description of development applicaticn z:,WÂ®â‚¬,52%29,Â« 40~,,40*Vet#1~3'19*' UNDEA ME*/ taanNd, Â«0(FURE!5 ORAOIRJUG, TEM!90*140/i< \WE+71,14,- #to#<TTON thakDO#4*t>f U WÂ¢ 64) OF EX#'9nkle ~1711214&ci, :22&27* - 10. Have ycu compieted and attached the foilowing? , Attachment 1- Land use appiication form i Att:achment 2- Dimensional requiremerits form . Response toÂ· Attachment 3 . i Re'sponse to Attachments 4 and 5 1-1-11-1 111 3 STUDIO I architects 2 December, 1997 Attachment 4, Submission Requirement 1: Overview: Temporary Historical House Relocation Mullins Residence - 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado The existing historic house was constructed in 1888 and is connected to a later-built. non-historic breezeway and garage. We are proposing to lift the original structure vertically approxi- mately six feet in order to excavate a new basement level. During the excavation, the house shall stay in this position on site. We are consulting and plan on working with Bailey House Movers, who have performed several successful projects of this nature in the City of Aspen. They are planning to separate the existing walls from the existing main floor. They will then place temporary beams and ledgers (exhibits A and B) in appropriate positions to lift the re- mailÂ·~ing structure. The original defective floor will then be removed. After the structure is lifted, supports will then be constructed, with the approval of a structural engineer, to facilitate the construction of a new, poured-in-place, concrete foundation. The tem- porary supports will then be removed in a prescribed manner to lower the house onto the new foundation in a position identical to the original. The exterior wood siding shall be placed 6-8 inches from grade per code with little of the new concrete foundation showing. 9 5 5 - mill St a:De ' ..- 816.t 9 70Â·9 20-942 9 :a, 970 120 7822 fILLO ASSOCIATES ENGI] . .S, INC. ST RU CTURA.L CONS ULTANTS 1 , 715 Grart 2 Avenue â€¢ P.O. Box 751 (9701 943.-(1095 â€¢ fax 70} 04 5-4921 GlenuÂ·Â·or* Springs. Colo:ado 91603 c-:nailÂ· .-32:Mil!*c.-iengrs Â·crm December 3.1 997 Studio B Architects 555 North Mill Street Aspen. CO Sle 11 re. Residence at 231 West Francis Avenue .Aspen, Colorado To Whom It May Concern. It is the professÂ·onal opinion ofile undersigned that with reasonable care ind adequate bracing, the original nint:teenth century two-story portion of the residence located at 234 West Francis may be successliilly moved from its present foundation and moved again at a later date to a proposed reconstructed tbundation at its present location. Moreover, the proposed interior renovations wil] result in improved structural integritv 3nd performance for both the substructure and the framed portions ofthe building shell to support current code-required snow, earth, and floor live loads This office was previously involved with a similar renovation project for the adjacent Carriage House in 1993. The temporary relocation ofthat building was successful. even though irs original strucal: e was in poor condition. We are availabl 3 to assist the owner and contractor with the review of the bracing plans and with obser. ation ser.ices during the move Sincerely. ..4 1,111-nme, /'<4~THE:y :;~'24,â€¢ 24.49â‚¬94182% Ar* '~6205- 41(Â§0....e o.:fbi 1 5 Z :Dr emn, 9:,3 Patt Ho, PE. :*13 10/9,4 3*3 3 0.4 Cio. 03. 6 ,- :.72 %472:*,7.:ayÂ· 0 co.0 4 RMP/bjk Â·,uumulu~wÂ·Â·, RM# ATTACHMENT 1 M Me v f-940.0, --LAND USE APPL]CATION F- A-r~ 1 Projec- name ~**22,0/52 dVDVATDA I.AMFORM/~16 : 2. Projec:: location Z#96 ,(4557- ,984/VÂ«3; :5;MSE;r- U>,735 /4<, 2- 0~I:?"~, ~Â£51:gi-le / 1 tbt.oat. 1* 1 Â» PEN 60 - (indicate streer address, lo~and block number or metes and bounds descript:68 ' 3. Present zoning R~. 4 Lot size fows 52. ,â‚¬ . i 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number '5&*.;:8~640\./ MOLLAN/ 1 4;51,4 Polf OAK PU.ce DRNS ) 40 rTe 149 Neu*To,J 7* 115 - 611.-146lt,i I 6. Representative's name, address. and phone number Â£5*â‚¬F'*0*Â£<EE.E&< 1 11800 *MOR58, toi M,Â£)1ANÂ¥) AME.~ DMAW- go *11 111-Wr!- *11* 1 7 Type of application (check all that apmy): 1 Conditionai Use Conceptuai SPA - Concectual HPC So(?Ciai Review Final SPA Final HPC . 80zlo Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor H PC 1 Stream Margin Final PUD v<* Reiccancrl HPC Subdivision Text'Map Amend. Historic Landmark f GNICS allotment GMQS exemption . Derne/Partial Demo ~ View Plane Condominiumization - __ Design Review I Lot SpliULot Line Appeai Committee I Adjustment , 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures. 1 approximate sc. 1. number of bedrogms, any previous approvals granted to the I progeoMWO moo- %04% ~mQ0724*91 t) 111013*.,97 , g 8)21. 1 PAN>Â¢1EL RE,&99au5e Â© 600\43. PrÂ· 1 / M. 00â‚¬AASe #0152Â£ 1 9. Description of devekipment application,:2*0*2029.d OF MEN FooN0441 UNDEA. NEW Eaerl,/6 5'DROCrUREe jQe~/AJAAE, 115,(190#AÂ« Vkâ‚¬1704*Â£2, R#Â£)OffrÂ©19 ~'~CDUM*11*f U WI 6#t) oF 80*nkle 41*71#16*L *988701 1 10. Have ycu completed and attached the foHowing? i . Attachment 1- Land use appiication form i Attachment 2- Dimensicnal requiremerits form I - Response toÂ· Attachment 3 1 1 Re'sponse to Attachments 4 and 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 Jan Derrington commented that he is willing to look at the color selection and work with Staff and monitor to come to a compromises thar will be agreeable to all parties. 234 W. FRANCIS - PUBLIC HEARING Gilbert was seated. Jeffrey did not vote on this item. Amy Guthrie. planner stared that this building is on the national register of historic places plus being a local landmark. The back of the house has a carriage house thar is nor historic and the applicant desires to change it back to a garage, add some dormers and change windows. Staff has no concern with those changes. There is a wing that runs 'between the garage toward the back of tile house that is partly old construction and partly nor. An open breezeway will be constructed in the new part of the wing. On the historic house the proposal is to add an octagonal kitchen on the north east comer. It is one story and does not damage the architectural integrity of the building. It is somewhat of an omate element and the house is a simple detailed house. There is also a proposal to extend a dormer and Staff is not in support as the dormer is original and visible from the street. It is too much o f an alteration. The small lean-to will be returned to its original state, a shed roof. Scott Lindeau, architect for the project remarked that the existing historic dormer is proposed to be extended out five feet which is in the attic space on the least visible side, the north. A dormer proposed is to be added to the guest property. In response to the octagonal kitchen if it was squared off you would loose the views too much. It is also dark and the ceilings are low so the proposal to do the octagonal adds more light to the eating space. The majority of the board had no problems with the proposal. The octagonal kitchen is a fur]. new element. There were reservations about the stair tower proportions and how it pops out from the building. From the 5 a ~7~3\# 611 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMIC,SION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 plans it looks like the stir could be moved back so that the dormer could line up. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve the proposal for the minor development. partial demolition of 234 W. Francis St. with the condition that the applicant look at revising the rear stair dormer so thar the wall aligns with the building wall below and that more research be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house to be approved by stag and monitor, second by Roger. Discussion: Gilbert recommended thai the extension beyond the building wall be eliminated. VOTE: Passed 4 - 3. Yes vote: Gilbert, Roger, Mark. Surannah. No vote: Mary, Melanie. Heidi. Those members who voted no felt that there were too many changes to this important house. 334 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Amy Guthrie. planner relayed to the board that this house is on the register and a local landmark. Ten years ago the owner, Marta Chaikovska and Frank Peters got an approval for a remodel but the addition was never built. The extensions are now expired. The public notices are not completed so the meeting will be a worksession. Phase I was the remodel ofthe carriage house that took place a few years ago. Phase U involves additionS to the historic house and a garage which faces Third Street. The garage placement is in conflict with ordinance #30, which requires garages to be placed on the alley; however, they have always pulled their cars into the existing space which is a paved uncovered driveway. In order for them to add a garage it would have to be isolated in the comer due to the vegetation on the alley. The garage proposed is a one stall garage. Staff is comfortable with the proposed location. The addition is a glass sunroom or green house that is quite visible from the street. It is a one story element. There is a one story addition to the back of tile historic house that was there in 1893 and 6 12 10, MEMORANDUM t:>Arti#tr A TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie. Historic Preservation Officer RE: 234 W. Francis- minor, partial demolition. Ordinance #30 DATE: October 8, 1997 SUMMARY: This structure is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is a local landmark. It is under contract to a new owner who wishes to remodel. On-site, there is a single family house and a voluntary ADU. in the small house on the east. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Muller].s, represented by Studio B. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street, Lots K,L. and M. Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUiMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the AspenÂ· Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: A map of the property as it appeared in 1904, as well as the National Register Nomination for the site are attached. The applicant intends to remove a living unit in the rear of the house, which is not historic construction, and convert ' ,. Â· the area to a garage. Skylights and new windows on the west will also be added . in this area. A new skylight is proposed for the ADU (house on east), Early in the houses- history, an addition was made to the back of it. This addition was later extended to link the house and rear unit (garage) together. The applicant proposes to remove the recent construction so that there is a breezeway between the historic house and garage. The historic rear addition is proposed to be converted into a shed roo f instead o f a gable roo f. A new kitchen is to be added at the southeast corner of the old house. and a new double hung window is proposed on the east side o f the old house. Finally, the applicant proposes to extend an existing dormer on the north side of the house out by 5 feet to accommodate a new staircase. In terms of the garage and breezeway, which are not historic construction. staff is in favor of the proposed changes. In terms of the ADU, staff finds that the shed dormer is nor visible from the street and therefore may be approved. On the hiSIOriC house. staff finds that the addition of the window on the east is acceptable. It must match the dimensions of the existing double hung windows. but will be distinguishable as new. Staff finds that the kitchen addition is not particularly compatible architecturally. since the historic house is very simple in form. An octagonal room like this would be more typical of omate Victorian architecture. It' s visibility from the street may be limited. making this an area where flexibility may be allowed. There are two aspects of the proposal which staff finds require more study; the extension of the dormer and the change in the roof slope over the historic rear addition. Staff finds that alterations to the features of the historic building should be very limited. The dormer is proposed to be littered as part of a relocation of the interior staircase. Staff finds that this change may be accommodated on the inside in a different ma:nner and that the corner location of this site makes the dormer alteration too visible. Additionally, the window in the proposed dormer is oversized and carries an FAR. penalty unless waived by HPC. In terms of the roof over the rear addition, staff recommends the applicant locate a historic photo of the building or make some investigation of the framing in that - area before a final approval is given for the change. The historic roof form should be retained or reconstructed if it is not as it appears today. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The house is part of a residential area, where numerous Victorians have been remodeled. . 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on tile parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal involves alterations to the building, but will not reduce it' s importance to the history of Aspen. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff has indicated the areas of concern related to architectural character and inIegrity o f the building. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation. No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicabie standards of Section 26.72.020(C). For the purposes of this section. "partial demolition' shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to demolish part of a non-historic addition between the house and garage. An area of the house will be removed on the first floor to make the kitchen addition. Staff finds both of these actions are acceptable and necessary to renovating the building. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: As stated, most of the demolition is non-historic construction. The removal of fabric to make an addition is limited to areas of the building not visible to the public. . * 0 B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures ', located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The addition is reviewed in depth above. Ordinance #30 The following standard of Ordinance #30 requires a variance from HPC, related to the new window in the dormer. Folume. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a building or portion thereof whose principal use is residential. a determination shall be made as to its interior plate heights. All areas with an exterior.expression of a plate height greater than ten (10) feet. shall be counted as two (2) square feet for each one (1) square foot of floor area. Exterior expression shall be defined as facade penetrations between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the level of the finished floor. and circular, semi circular or non-orthogonal fenestration between nine (91 and fifteen (15) feet above the level of the finished floor. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposal for minor development and partial demolition at 234 W. Francis Street, with the condition that the applicant eliminate the extension of the rear dormer and that more research must be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house, to be approved by staff and monitor. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposal for minor development and partial demolition at 234 W. Francis Street, with the condition that the applicant eliminate the extension of the rear dormer and that more research must be done on the . 4- slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house, to be approved by staff and monitor." . ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name kvul,INS 971*hrâ‚¬8 904 ON râ„¢ hi 2. Project location 2340' W @*r- 8619 4 5 Dr- ks,GN (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 8.-4. 4. Lot size 1, 000 9 F. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Porc t- Fwn4 s V CA,t Re RANS*7 06 V ( P/19 Dâ€¢K 117- A<000â‚¬ fax'*7 164 -7 24 0 35+ 0774 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9,6-rl-- o WCÂ»/'fU 9Â·ru 9,-0 2, AOLM t WeÂ« 54 5 N. MI bl/ 9 TO AS1'64 Col 9/0 11 120 14â‚¬ 7. Type of application (check all that apply). Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD vx Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures: approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Ek ppr-1 R30- 5 doo 9 P W t'Pt , liT MAJ899 14,00 5. f. Fu aff- 40-rl-ANF - 04501{3- 817VSâ‚¬:- w/ 4 5 6epa.:,HS krfD Guet'F UnMOG- *4 1-WD. 9. Description of development application *P prn,W oF 1 83 5'F purASW g Hz, Prli Â¢(POL 01=- *7*14 6 V'; 9 46 W VÂ»rwr3-- 3*e- u e WAe-5 4 1>**4Â£- 12' 1}te-- 801 hd *t._1 GAPAee ADD, N-5- A- P'@/M,62- iry T*= 6: AAra,s 0 & re: F ~ 0,-45 'twi FOren, A- 0951- 1/3- W 11Â·.[Dow . 10. Have you completed and attached the following? rf Attachment 1- Land use application form J Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form -v-~-Response to Attachment 3 ./- Response to Attachment 4 11111111 C ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: 9 W * 5-wehi havt,GINg Address: 2.5 + W 9~7-- f~,+21 1 4'r-via'r- Zone district: A-4 Lot size: 1 doe 56. Existing FAR: 4, f 60 Fe Allowable FAR: 5440 yf Proposed FAR: 3 1 1,0 50 Existing net leasable (comÂ·mercial): Proposed net leasable (commerCial): _ Existing % of site coverage: 37% Proposed % of site coverage: Â£7 016 Existing % of open space: -6, Proposed % of open space: 1-,er BRNIM Existing maximum height: Princioal blda: Z 9 Accesor/ bldc: 11 Proposed max. height: Princioal bida: 1 F Accessory bldg: 11 Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: 0 Proposed number of bedrooms: 4 Existing on-site parking spaces: 0 On-site parking spaces required: 1,- 99990560 thi NEÂ»J G.A/'grit Setbacks Existing. Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 3,0 ~-wM 61*3*P Front: Front: Rean Rear: Rear Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: '70 Fronurear. FronUrear: Side: Side: W Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: 0<447.7- Con/ 5, Ba â€¢f mp T- BeÂ·Wi- Cobtwax= fe*,121 +19- SerÂ»,rzw- 00- Ira't#-Drri VaMations requested: / (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ST[1010II architects 30 September 1997 Community Development Department The City of Aspen 130 South galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom it May Concern, We have asked our architect, Scott Lindenau of Studio B Architects to act as our representative in the application and approval process regarding out project at 234 West Francis Street in Aspen. Thank you Sincerely, 3 9-MU# 6 Don and/or Gwen Mullins, Owners 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970-920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 . I ---04 10 74 1- 0 'La.ive. Or 1 ~%,ic B d . 10 \ 4%1444- SWâ€ž . -r. ASPEN ~Â¢41~ 4~4* C., r /4, COLORADO 1//1 .1 1 93: g I 12 ,.31 Gi-st L~ ~ > 1 SUper King Dr 3 M SprulÂ¢ St 4 Cooinwood La of' S 1 Diviv j A ju Art 6 O.k L. Mâ€¢~ . 7 M.ple 1-0 44 5 $ Mkllacd Put M F -7 i 1 - 4 9 M-,=La Q . â‚¬ - == . 5 to S=wer C-â€¢e a 4 ~ , 7 n ,Udmore Cl ~F l N~ trmÂ»~Â·Â·= 7/ 14 Midi- Â»e 4 1. 15 Ma,0-ra 4 4 4 - 74 k. . - 0 - , 1 1 0, 2 4# 1 r.40 t5 9'il I % 1 9 . 1 Lâ€¢AA $ 1 f f 1 1 1 11 1 - Ijacuâ€¢â€¢-c,mo. 1 1 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 NAth - 1/....'. -*I 1 --- .41 1 0 1/2 UILE , 1 ---- -L. 1 1 ' 0 1/2 KILOMETER 1 1 1 1 01"5 22,0- Directork. Ca- Inc Vicinity Map 4 . STUDIOII architects ' 30 September 1997 Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 234 West Francis Street Mullins Residence Renovation/Attachment 4. The proposed minor addition and renovation of the existing residence located at 234 West Francis Street is well within the square footage limits, height limitations, and does not effect the existing setback conditions. The same materials shall be used for the 1dtchen addition to the north that is contained by the existing architecture. Ihese include clapboard siding, cedar shake roofing with copper flashing, and identical window and door trim. Similar mullion patterns shall be used in the new windows as in the existing. A new roof is proposed on the existing house of the same material due to the deteriorating condition. The original garage shall be returned to use as a garageÂ·accessed at the alley with two new shed dormers proposed at the upper level. Development at the historic main house is contained at Â·the north or least visible facade and is limited to the 1<itchen turret. An additional window at the lower level east elevation is proposed in the dining room. The difficulty with the existing windows lies in the fact that they are single glazed and lie 10" above the finished upper level floor. Code requires 1'-6" and needs to be tempered glass. The existing small dormer in the attic is proposed to be pushed out 5 feet to accommodate the new stair up to the upper level A shed don:ner is also requested at the existing north roof of the guest cottage. Again, this is the least visible facade. All elements and details shall readily complement and accentuate the existing historic residence, and shall visibly complement the West End neighborhood standards. Please see the attached architectural package. 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81 6'1 1 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 t. r ,#-.i. 14. 0 - 3//1 0 0 140 0 ST. .6/ Fl.\ , 0 , 14 1. j U M t. ' 04, \ 04< 400 0 400 310*y,Â·, 0 4 !6311:.dipÂ·. D 11 .'. r; 2 K$ K A 0 :Y Lt 0 ,#3 77 LE - .% r-7 Â£ 8 % L 8 2215* O . It 7-4 - W E--7 t , C C It kX: 11 i , -- ~-7 - - 41 4 '' r 11 Â·p - 1< # , 7 n L. 1 4 0 0 4171 14 0 D \// .. 4- P i 49 + 1 0,6 Y 48 - 4: 27 9'1 f S. 4 4 3>4 11 - 1 r /,(5 11 - r-7f , 4 -7- A: 1. 14 91 4 p 3/Ll I_-I i''i ' 1.- 11 7 1, P 111 - 01. L.fy_ 0 C') 0 0 :rgo, 1 7--7~ F 7 6' 11 4 4 -710 F 4 FI /7><51 L.1 11 ---1 Al, 1 L._21 ,?i'. - 11, , 0 1//1/i 1, f, 11 - 2 1: 2 -3 .-#-.. , R l.1 - 3 /4 - ILY.. %'1'' . 81 HÂ· ,- 4 2 L-Fl-F-Â£1'1 - 147 t.. 3Â·Â·Â·Â· L - , l ., i 1 0 1 1 / 6/ I, 0 '1 P r - El 411, .J. 1 Ph / 4 14 4,7 S , flit# %1~ 1 0 L,LE Â·Â· D/1. \- 4 1 409 . 404 409 4!) 0 't b' & . 41 4 4 S ST. NÂ·4r u k I l~* â€¢â€¢r 1,11 0 : 4-11 =4 = =A == m = = ==== t= === = = == =* == == m == = == =2 0 114 a H. 6 2.Â· 4,2 k'< 1/ 1 I lia-1 -7 K -] â€ž ~ # /-~ 11 1 4"87---- - o A' ~A 01 4 F - 11 tiv 217 . . - --7.-- I } ~ 7. Description 157 Condition Check one Check one J n/aexcellent n/adeteriorated Illa unaltered E-_ original site -24_ good n/a ruins X altered Illa moved date J Plarair 222 unexposed Describe the present and original lif known) physical appearance J The 1888 Davis Waite House is a large two story dwelling with rectangular plan, n 3 n .._vped roof and a front gaoÂ·- ell. Sized on a 1 corner, the house is constructed or wood frai faced in clanboard. 71 There 9â€ž0 - 1 6---- .- everal mature cozzonwoods along -ch side street and in - -2 -Wil G . . There is a low wooden picket fence around the street sides o= the four loss. To the east of the house is a small, oneÂ·- 1 b Uu_ ... ing with a gable roof and faced with clapboarc wnien is said zo be one .- of the earlv 10= r.shine uy,Her :he D I m -, ninâ€¢- vâ€¢A . - 5 &--#---/* *..UL 9=Cqdwc_- VIU.Lviâ€¢ .â€¢-o Drobablv put on in the 139Gs. Â£ U -LU -u r .0 1 (-90---* 448, Sa, 8b) . The building is contribuzinc The waite mouse is a vernacular Queen Anne desigr wi-D U . ornament except in the gable which 4 s faced wi:n zisr scale sh_u les and has bargeboards. The front porch, on the west side ine is small and orojects ou: =--- the iron: - - 0 r .11 0 - n c &.. 2 1 story =â€žnong=d ves:~bul- -9 . --LC . 1 JU- U. -99- U.., #- ...W -1./:Ill)(: . _ .-__ &. -0 a One C 1- I - - Â·-â€¢ An- 4 2 r - nn -7 10 -r~ A be a laser addition wi-h -4=, torch recul_: in :he iron:. The noren roof is al s 2 - -2-ci , survorzed ty 13 _ vy :urned "Â· r~ C-C =Â·'4 -4 - - U U -, u ~ V V ... W 1 4 = bracke:s a: -che zon. - The windows are one-over-one, double hung wood sash and for the most var:. are tall and narrow single windows or in nairs. The first iloor window in =he fron= and the one on the west side are double the width of the single windows. -- At the rear of the house on the a=iey is a two story, wood frame and clapboard house with a broad gable roof cons-cructed in 10 <6 * In I I 1959, a one storv gable rocf-addition was ous onto the rear of the W .* house connecting it with tbÂ© 1956 building, (photo #82) All of the buildings are nainted a dark red 9 1. color with white trim and ciack accen-cs. The Waite House is a designated local landmark. * This buildinc is non-contributing. -int.- 1 n. 7 t. S L. ./ h. r I (D W 1 PU 3 . ro) C .C) E i. ri .0 tr. I -- 158 8. Significance Piriod ' Areas of Significance-Check and justify below ~ n/a prehistoric Ilka. archeology-prehastortc D/~bmmunity clanning DZ@ landscape architecture AL@ religion 0,Za 1400-1499 nih. archeology-historic :92 conservation Â· 3/(a law n/a science n~Za- 1500-1599 nia agriculture :11 economics nia literature 2.Za sculpture humanitarian rUS 1600-1699 -R_ architecture rvia education Fld.g military 2/3 sociati nda 1700-1799 n/3_ art nia engineering 32.2 music n/a theater -1 1800-1899 nla commerce n./1 exploration settlement ZE@ philosophy ..$.-.I aria 1 900_ --41 communications n,Za industry -3 _ politics/government 21=transportation 32& invention 0â‚¬3 other (specify) Specific dates 1888 Builder. Architect Noc knewn Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The Waize House ts signifizant fc= its a.=sccianicn with Davis H C... Aspen a*zer:-le'- and newscaper cdlisher who was elected gove-ncr of Coloradc in 1893. Waite lived here before rd after his storrr t.c vear term as governcr, - until his dead in 1900. It is the residence mast associated wit Waite in the 'The srrall buildinc lus= easz of the Waite Hnuse is i=x=tant in Aspen' s staze. 4- - archicectural develop:ren=. Cricinally a picneer leg cabin, 1= was later cove with clacboards as the taÂ·m. developed bevend a mere mining carm. 2.e Waize H-,se itself is an example of the large, p-aan ve=acular dwellings typical of the -= 1880s and earli; 1890s =hat were build of local sazerials. -- 9 q /,4-= 11= -.1 = 4=q - oreserved houses of =ris =me -- 1 2-=r -- P.CKGPOUE Davis Hanion waite, bar. 2 Jares--wn, Naq York on Auril 9, 1825, care to --. Leadville, Colorado in 1879 where he pracrices Law Derore roving no Aspen in 1881. elected Justice of the Peace in 1881 and was also appoinzed the zirs= Waite was - '. sunerintendet of schools in Aspen. 1 In 1882, Waite and his son startec y.e Ashcroft Jourmal in the mininc cam= of Ashcroft. Walte bought the Aspen y=es - I in 1883, but sold : 4- +1 1. Clark ED.eeler, wne laner became Waite's son-in-LE.T. - Waize and Wneeler alsc established a law practice together. = In 1885, Walte married Mrs. Celia O. Malty of Eancusit, New Uork, a second marriage for both. 9 . -Waite, a labor sympathizer anc Ponulist, acvocaze= rree silver and other radical reforms. He founded the Aspen Union Era in 1891, a weekly newspaper. In . 189 2, the Ponulist Partv nominated Davis Waite for Governor of Colorado and he was inaugurated on January 10, 189 3. When Waite took office, the price c= silver was declining and the business climate was economically unsound. By July, the situation was bleak as the econorrw crashed in Colorado with the ddrronitorization - of silver. Waite snake to a 1--ge crowd asserbled to discuss the deteriorazing conditions. In his speech Waita earned the nicknea& "Bloody Bridles Waite" from 11 a phrase taken out of context: It is infinitely better that blood should flow to our It 1 ' horses' bridles rather than our national liberties should be destroyed. , It was during Governor Waize' s tem that the bill for werners sufferage in Colorado was enacted into law, Taking Colorado the second state in the union to do so. For the Inost part, however, Governo-r Waite's term was stoCIEr-, walked by labor and political unrest, unerployment and economic depression. Tne miners strike at Cripple Creek which was settled in 1894, gave a victory to the new union, 1 the Western Federation of Miners, and proved a political set back to Waite and the Populist Party. The "City Hall War" in March 1894, added further miseries to Waite's term. When he tried to dismiss two meirbers of the Denver Fire and Police 1 Board, they barricaded therrselves in the Denver City Hall and refused to leave. Waite called out the arred militia and Federal troops to surround City Hall. Thousands of Denver citizens turned out to watch the action--which never materialized - as Waite decided to let the courts decide the matter.3 M dh 1. 4 - NPS Form 1(Â·900Â·â€¢ OMa No. 1024-OA;9 0.82) .v-. -- , --.--45 -0-31-37 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places ~--3 Inventory-Nomination Form Continuation sheet Significance-Waite House Item number 8 Page 2 Davis Waite's bid for re-election was unsuccessful and he retu. ned to Aspen where he died of a heart at=ack in November 1900 while helping his wife orepare Thanksgiving di.-.-_. I rn~Â·r Mrs. Waite died in 1937 and both are buried at Red Butte Cemetery in Aspen. 4 In the late 1940s the house was the home of Gerbert Bayer k noted artist and indutrial designer, who case to A==n in 1946 0 work with Walter Pae-ke. - In 1953, the house was owned by R. 0. Anderson, whe is still the cwner. Anderson served a tne chairman of the b--d of the Asper. Institute for Hum=nistic Studies. Footnotes J r - Rchert F. Bartlett, "Asnen: The Miring Commrl=y", 1950 Brand Beck (Denver: The Westerners, Vol. v_, =you), p. 144-145. - 0 As=en Times, Azzil 8, 1882, 4. I.*. - 2. Andrew P. Buesch and Mannel Hahnn, "Asren over the Divide-.-q Past and Present", The Westerners Brand Book. (Chicago: vol. VIZI, Mav 19 51) , p. 19. 4 1n Asren Ti,Ires, May =r, 1880, n.10.; Jarrimnr 12, 1884, 0. 1. Len Shoemaker- Pioneers of the Roaring Fork (Denver: Sage Bccks, 1975) -Ill- .-I--- -i-- -- D. 1/. 3. Leaoy R. Hafen, editor, Colorado and Its Peonle (New Your: lewis Historical Publishing Co., 1948), Vol. I, p.-465. Carl Ubbelchde, Maxine Benson, Duane A. Smith, A Colorado Historv (Boulder: Pruett Publishing Co., 19721, pp. 224-225; 228-232. 4. Aeen Times, January 14, 1937, n.p. Shoemaker, p. 77. - Â·21.- 4 #19--1.- ..r - L "iE U *6 CARELâ‚¬,AF) 81.r,Ed PARCEL ID:| DATERCVD: |12/02/97 # COPIES:~ CASE NO~HPC40-97 CASE NAME:~1.lullins Temporary Relocation PLNR:|Amy Amidon PROJ ADDR:1234 W Francis CASE TYP:~Temporary Relocation STEPS:] OWN/APP: Mullins, Don & Gwe 1 ADR~4545 Post Oak Place C/S/Z: ~Houston, TX PHN~(713) 622-2464 REP:|Gary Wheeler - Mason & M ADR:~201 Midland Avenue C/S/Z:~Basalt, CO 81621 PHN1927-3232 FEES DUE:~240 FEES RCVD:~240 STAT: F-- REFERRALS~ REF:~ BY~ DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 F 1 1 H DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ --- BOCOCC: REMARKS| PZ: BOA: CLOSED:~ BY: | HRG OFF:1 PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT {BK.PG):~ ADMINi U .MAUUV --%%%%-- 12 D. MEMORANDUM C>1- 1-t' i & 1 T A TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 234 W. Francis- minor, partial demolition, Ordinance #30 DATE: October 8, 1997 SUMMARY: This structure is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is a local landmark. It is under contract to a new owner who wishes to remodel. On-site, there is a single family house and a voluntary ADU. in the small house on the east. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullens. represented by Studio B. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street, Lots K,L. and M, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District. or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the AspenÂ· Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design. massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: A map of the property as it appeared in 1904, as well as the National Register Nomination for the site are attached. The applicant intends to remove a living unit in the rear of the house, which is not historic construction, -and convert the area to a garage. Skylights and new windows on the west will also be added in this area. A new skylight is proposed for the ADU (house on east). Early in the houses' history, an addition was made to the back of it. This addition was later extended to link the house and rear unit (garage) together. The applicant proposes to remove the recent construction so that there is a breezeway between the historic house and garage. The historic rear addition is proposed to be converted into a shed roof instead of a gable roof. A new kitchen is to be added at the southeast comer of the old house. and a new double hung window is proposed on the east side of the old house. Finally, the applicant proposes to extend an existing dormer on the north side of the house out by 5 feet to accommodate a new staircase. In terms of the garage and breezeway, which are not historic construction. staff is in favor of the proposed changes. In terms of the ADU. staff finds that the shed dormer is not visibie from the street and therefore may be approved. On the historic house, staff finds that the addition of the window on the east is acceptable. It must match the dimensions of the existing double hung windows. but will be distinguishable as new. Staff finds that the kitchen addition is not particularly compatible architecturally, since the historic house is very simple in form. An octagonal room like this would be more typical of ornate Victorian architecture. It' s visibility from the street may be limited. making this an area where flexibility may be allowed. There are two aspects of the proposal which staff finds require more study; the extension of the dormer and the change in the roof slope over the historic rear addition. Staff finds that alterations to the features of the historic building should be very limited. The dormer is proposed to be hltered as part of a relocation of the interior staircase. Staff finds that this change may be accommodated on the inside in a different manner and that the corner location of this site makes the dormer alteration too visible. Additionally, the window in the proposed dormer is oversized and carries an FAR penalty unless waived by HPC. In terms of the roof over the rear addition, staff recommends the applicant locate a historic photo of the building or make some investigation of the framing in that area before a final approval is given for the change. The historic roof form should be retained or reconstructed if it is not as it appears today. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The house is part of a residential area, where numerous Victorians have been remodeled. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel - proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal involves alterations to the building, but will not reduce it's importance to the history of Aspen. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff has indicated the areas of concern related to architectural character and integrity of the building. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation. No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(C). For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to demolish part of a non-historic addition between the house and garage. An area of the house will be removed on the first floor to make the kitchen addition. Staff finds both of these actions are acceptable and necessary to renovating the building. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: As stated, most of the demolition is non-historic construction. The removal of fabric to make an addition is limited to areas of the building not visible to the public. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The addition is reviewed in depth above. Ordinance #30 The following standard of Ordinance #30 requires a variance from HPC, related to the new window in the donner. Folume. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable tloor area for a building or portion thereof whose principal use is residential. a determination shall be made as to its interior plate heights. All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height greater than ten (10) feet, shall be counted as two (2) square feet for each one (1) square foot of floor area. Exterior expression shall be defined as facade penetrations between nine (91 and twelve (12) feet above the level of the finished floor, and circular. semi circular or non-orthogonal fenestration between nine (9) and fifteen (15) feet above the level of the finished floor. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposal for minor development and partial demolition at 234 W. Francis Street, with the condition that the applicant eliminate the extension of the rear dormer and that more research must be done on the slope of the original roo f on the rear addition of the house, to be approved by staff and monitor. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposal for minor development and partial demolition at 234 W. Francis Street, with the condition that the applicant eliminate the extension of the rear dormer and that more research must be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house, to be approved by staff and monitor." ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name kvuu INS 2547 peive- 062,4Â£,V /rn, d 2. Project location â‚¬340- W 991- Fiebu 0( S fl- ksren/ (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning A-4. 4. Lot size 1 r 000 g p 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number. Pork f Fwg,4 /~1/6/0.,t.4 12*NODO 06 V ( pt,9 DeK Ill N ooPâ‚¬ rex'/14 7804 -7 240 33 + 0776 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9467-1- l, 1,Woe>*14 flu PLO g, 24Â£44 116eg 94 5 N. MIU, 911 Al 1'64 40 . Â®tull 120 944 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD vx Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. DescMption of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 57<19Â·r-! Ne- 5800 â‚¬F POPIP,i~-0 w t'r}t 'e-r,zi#571 14,00 C. f. SLU 041- 40-rrA#-6: - Â©09<-7,G- 017VSâ‚¬:- w/ 4 5 4Â¢Fpawâ€¢15 AM 6 u ml- 69 ttk,G- w / 1â„¢0. 9. Description of development application 4 2,77,4 op T %06 9 9 *urÂ£152,4 A NDPrM Â¢(Pe OP *7114 *vge daNverre- *p, Nzp- /4- p,@/Mac- 9-' TME- 6 8â€¢96 * 62 7.emÂ¢ E 00 +46:- ANP -41*2,- A- 0951- INO- W 1141>OW . 10. Have you completed and attached the following? (/ Attachment 1 - Land use application form J Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 u/~'Response to Attachment 4 11111111 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: poN * ht/,4 Mvtul,M Address: 25 4 1. 597- f=,+21 1 9r-gap-r Zone district: A- 6 Lot size: 1 000 SAÂ· Existing FAR: , f CO FF. Allowable FAR: 3 4&2 5-F: Proposed FAR: 31 1, 57- Existing net leasable (comma'cial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: 37 % Proposed % of site coverage: 17 6 6% Existing % of open space: -6, Proposed % of open space: Nâ€¢ 0- .0.-4/1 180 Existing maximum height Principal bldg: 29 Accesorv bldg: Il Proposed max. height: Principal blda: 1, F Accessory bldg: 11 Proposed % of demolition: IN=viv' A *e,e ulTÂ·t,9 N q to'(0 -,4 5,per-- Existing number of bedrooms: G Proposed number of bedrooms: 4 Existing on-site parking spaces: 0 On-site parking spaces required: ./+ 9990560 Ird t<E\N G~ANDâ‚¬* Setbacks Existing: , Minimum reauired: Proposed: Front: 30 j Â£401 6#NFP Front: Front: Rear. Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: 90 Front/rear: FronUrear: Side: Side: W Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: r Existing nonconformities or encroachments: 0<lâ‚¬Â·90.- unv,trw NS: '01- Bew)- ColAreet> fee-AP, 149- serM-Â¥-- 0 0- â€ž1 94-r-F: Variations requested: / (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ST{1010II architects 30 September 1997 Community Development Department The City of Aspen 130 South galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom it May Concern, We have asked our architect Scott Lindenau of Studio B Architects to act as our representative in the application and approval process regarding out project at 234 West Francis Street in Aspen. Thank you. Sincerely, ~ WMÂ»MA~74wA Don and/or Gwen Mullins, Owners 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 8161 1 970-920-9428 fax 970Â·920-7822 A - a ., 4 \Â« ~1= k~ Â»1 -bo Xe- 7 NA 1-- 0 -,c~ AX \ .NE /.M~v,â€ž Dr B 10 4/94.4/ m..... r ASPEN M. 4 1 2 5 0 7. r COLORADO Â· 1./ .= 2 57 7 -1 z g I 82 (]i SI 1.~,;~ > 1 Super Kin: Or 2 R.. Sl . a 3 N Se,lag St 0 - 4 Cot=vood La i 3 ADI Am / S, 4 NO.. 6 O.k La . 7 Maple La 1 Mkilaod P=t M 3, 5 4 9 M..c,= La O 4 < 4 6 10 Smot= O,0. a 1 7 11 A,aorâ‚¬ Ct 12 River:kic Ave 13 D.Ic A. 4 14 Midi- A. 1 15 M,yflower a 4 1 1 44 74Â» ~ L 4 1 - 1 , -4 ei A - -r 9 15 91-f ,i i '4 n IL Wit t f I 1 1 1 MOAO CLAS-PICATO~ 1 82 1 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1/2 MILE / 1 ~ 1~ -t- 1 : 0 1/2 KILOMETER 1 1 , 0 105 Phoo, Directorl= Ce. Inc Vicinity Map 44 : 4 4 '08'44 4111 - STUDIOB architects 30 September 1997 Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 234 West Francis Street, Mullins Residence Renovation/Attachment 1 The proposed minor addition and renovation of the existing residence located at 234 West Francis Street is well within the square footage limits, height limitations, and does not effect the existing setback conditions. The same materials shall be used for the kitchen addition to the north that is contained by the existing architecture. These include clapboard siding, cedar shake roofing with copper flashing, and identical window and door trim. Similar mullion patterns shall be used in the new windows as in the existing. A new roof is proposed on the exisang house of the same material due to the deteriorating condition. The original garage shall be returned to use as a garage-accessed at the alley with two new shed dormers proposed at the upper level. Development at the historic main house is contained at the north or least visible facade and is limited to the 1<itchen turret An additional window at the lower level east elevation is proposed in the dining room. The difficulty with the existing windows lies in the fact that they are single glazed and lie 10" above the finished upper level floor. Code requires 1'-6" and needs to be tempered glass. The existing small dormer in the attic is proposed to be pushed out 5 feet to accommodate the new stair up to the upper level A shed dormer is also requested at the existing north roof of the guest cottage. Again, this is the least visible facade. All elements and details shall readily complement and accentuate the existing historic residence, and shall visibly complement the West End neighborhood standards. Please see the attached architectural package. 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 816'11 970-920-9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 -0 J.1 - - - - S'502#7 -- t,--"-21227941Â£---sim,I,.~---.-dÂ£/4*.1" 4 ..LI i-1 1 -#9. . ... ..Â·. 24* I -- 0.",1...~Ir.Â£,..~=-Iid..Ii'Ii'*â€¢r-- 4.-46. + ..>pi?72-- ~*3 -4 . C.... 2..... - 7% *..Â» - <4%65755,~C- '/ -Le., i 6. a.%?â€ž7 .- - A " i, Â·' -' â€¢ ~ ...' i'fi-29"",0 I. .../. i.. 1 -- L 1 ST. . C W. Pipe D h 09: - 34 --/ 2/2 -: -> u : * f~ 7-28 234 - --r ---- 202 a * r--1 1 1 . Ill ,/*It 2 1-: ... * %1 N i . 9-6 CD 1-9 LE! :i al- I 1 4- 10 1~ S 4 2 02*44 2 7 ,Â©...~0><j~1 11 -7 1 * 1. \ 1 -1! 0 - 00 75' > --01*Ime -4 X I i # 1 -q~ 1><51* + 1 & ll.1 0 1 + 1 ;# " ----1 - - = -- - 115-w.-~7 - ---~ = = =, ..=--t===b--- ---WvFRANOES= === =-- ==- 11 - .14 510 516 522 526 .... ~ 750 9 4 th - -- l_ f . 1 1-1 --1- -- /9 5- N - Â»CE M . 3 11 r. 11 - ~i~~. &- - i. ... 11 L -1- 4- 2.:i 0 0 - 07: ll= 11 339*/hÂ· 4 <9 0 0-1 Z.j 11 ur-; ' 121 7 1 C:I 11 1 - N 1% -09 . #ut/10.21~3><21 K \I = 9 - Tri 11 ro -3 B~ 11 11 t N/' 1 A-:A - G T 2 - 1.- 0 53\ 10 - XL .-I- 1/ .4 \1 -0 4, 7 11 A 11 . Z 11 1-1 in #ifi .0-.* - r cr 09. 1 rip /./ \73 1 7. Description - 157 Condition Check one Check one Illf-Bexcellent Ola deteriorated Illa unaltered X_ original site X_ good 11/2 ruins X altered n/4 moved date 3 -Natair 1.2 unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The 1888 Davis Waite House is a large two story dwelling with a rectangular plan, hipped roof and a front gable ell. Sited on a corner, the house is constructed of wood frame faced in clapboard. 1 There are several mature costonwoods along The side street and in front. There is a low wooden Dicket fence around the street sides 01 =he four loss. To the east of the house is a small, one story oulia- 1 - - ing with a gable rooI anc =aced with clapboa M - wh-nh is said to be one -- - u'll 01 une earlv Log cabins under :he clapboard exterier, which was orobablv put on in the 18903. (photo #8, Sa, 8b) .The building is contribuzing. 1 The Waite House is a vernacular Queen Anne design wizh Li:ile 1 -I ornamens except in the gable, which is faced with fish scale sningles and has bargeboards. The front porch, on th west side of the ell, i is small and projects out from the front of =he house. There is a one story enclosed vestibule with a flat roof behind the porch, which may . be a later addition wisn :ne porch rebuilt In the =ronD. The porch n. - n I roo= is also z-at sunvorzed by heavy turned vosts with decorative -- brackets at the top. The windows are one-over-one, double hung wood sash and for the -1 most part, are :ail and narrow single windows or in pairs. The first floor window in the front and the one on the west side are double the width of the single windows. At the rear of the house on the alley is a two story, wood frame and clapboard house wi:h a broad gable rocf cons:ructed in 1956.* In 1959, a one story gable rocf-addition was put onto the rear of the house connecting iz with the 1956 building. (photo #82) All of the buildings are painted a dark red color with white trim and black accen-cs. The Waite House is a designated local landmark. * This building is non-contributing. Ci i ./'i i I --1 if 14--Â·Â·,r./--Tr-Â·I ---- 8. Significance 158 Period Areas of Significance-Check and justify below 'a- prehistoric Illb. archeology-prehistoric DZEbommunity planning DZ# landscape architecture Ill(~ religion a 1400-1499 022. archeology-historic nia conservation 1-2 law n/a science n/8 1500-1599 ala agriculture mla economics nia literature 2,/a sculpture n/a 1600--1699 -Z_. architecture :via education aL military FEB social/ ula 1700-1799 n/3_ art nLE engineering ola music humanitarian 2_1800-1899 n,<a commerce n.la exploration settlement Illa. philosophy n/a theater :/ a E-7= r/a 1900- - communications n,La industry 1_ politicsmovernment =LE transportation DZ@. invention ILA other (specity) Specific dates 1888 Bulider,Architect Not known Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The Waize House -- - --4 3.=EC)~El.arion with Davis H. " b E-O.111_-al.- -*- __- haiter 27 Hspen attorney and newspaper p=lisher wno was elected governor cf Colorado in 1893. Waite Lived here before and after his stormv Â·cwc year term as=overner, - J until his ri==-h 4 n 1900. It is the resicence most associated with Waite in me state. Tb.e small building just east of the Waite House is Lwortant in Aspen's architectcal developxent. OrtÂ·tally a pioneer ic= cabin, it was later covered with clapbo--ds as the tam de)â‚¬1022 bevond a mere trinc cazo. Tne waite Mouse - itself is an exancle of the larze, =lain vernacular dwellincs typical of the late - - 4 -- 1880s and earlv 1390s â‚¬nat were build of local materials. It is one of the best =reserved houses of this u.ne in Aspen. - P.CKGROUE Davis Hanson Waite, born in Jarces--an, Naq York on Anril 9, 1825, care to eadville, Colorado in 1879 where he practice= law before moving to Aspen in 1881. Waite was elected Justice of the Peace in 18 8 1 and was also appoinued the first. superintendent of schools in Aspen. 1 In 1882t Waite and his son started the Ashcroft Journal in the mininc carin of Ashcraft. Wai'= -- bought the Aspen Tires - 1:-1 1882 . bu- sold it tr- 3. Clark iÂ·Â·Â·Ti.ealer, wic Lauer bâ‚¬=aine Waite' s son-in-laiÂ·r. Waize anc Wrieeler alsc established a law pracnice tocether.2 In 1885, Waite -. married Mrs. Celia O. Malty of Sang=it, New Uork, a second marriage zor Doth. Waite, a labor synpathizer and Populist, advocated free silver and other radical reforms. He founded the Aspen Union Era in 1891, a weekly newspaper. In 1892, the Populist Party nominated Davis Waite for Governor of Colorado and he was inaugurated on January 10, 189 3. Ehen Waite took office, the price of silver was declining and the business climate was economically unsound. By July, the situation was bleak as the economv crashed in Colorado with the dimonitorization of silver. Waite spoke to a large crowd asserbled te discuss the deterioratinc conditions. In his speech Waite earned the nicknarre, "Bloody Bridles Waite" from a phrase taken out of context: "It is infinitely better that blood should flow to our horses' bridles rather than our national liberties should be destroved. " It was during Governor Waiter s term that the bill for women' s sufferage in Colorado was enacted into law, making Colorado the second state in the union to i do so. For the most part, however, Governor Waite's term was stormy, marked by labor and political unrest, une=ployment and economic depression. Tne miners strike at Cripple Creek which was settled in 189 4, gave a victory to the new union r the Western Federation of Miners, and proved a political set back to Waite and the Populist Party. The "City Hall War" in March 1894, added further miseries to Waite's term. When he tried to dismiss two merrbers of the Denver Fire and Police Board, they barricaded therrselves in the Denver City Hall and refused to leave. Waite called out the armed militia and Federal troops to surround City Hall. Thousands of Denver citizens turned out to watch the action--which never materialized - as Waite decided to let the courts decide the matter.3 NPS Form 12-900.0 OMB Na. 1024- 0459 0-82) . Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior 1-J National Park Service National Register of Historic Places ~=_3 Inventory-Nomination Form Continuation sheet Significance-Waite House Item number 8 Page 2 1- Davis Waite ' s ola ror re-election was unsuccessful and he returned to Aspen f - where he died of a heart attack in Noverrber 1900 while helping his wife prepare Thanksgiving dinner. Mrs. Waite died in 1937 anc both are buried at Red Butt:e Cemetery in Aspen. 4 In the laze 1940s the house was the home of Gerbert Bayer, noted artist and industrial designer, who carre to Aspen in 1946 to work with Walter Paepcke. In 1953, the house was owned by R. O. Anderson, who is still the owner. Anderson served as the chal=man of =he Doarcl of the Aspen Institute for HlImarlistic Studies. Footnotes J 1 1247=Â·r- W' 1,v--1 0+-- "leÂ·non. 'Tnk= Vinihg Corr[Trarittzvrr, 1950 BrarKE Bcxik <Denver-: -116- 1 Th= Duac -O-n .ers, Vol. VI, 1950), 0. 144-145. n enon m ' =imes, April 8, 1882, 0. 2. 2. Andrew F. Buesch and Mannel Hahnn, "Aspen over the Divide-Its Past and Preser 'The Westerners Brand Book. (.Chicago: Vol. VIII, May 1951), p. 19. Aspen Tires May 19, 1883, n.p.; January 12, 1884, p. 1. Len Shoemaker, Pioneers or =ne Roaring Fork (Denver: Sage BOOKS, -3 ,=j I-- .-Ill-I.. -----*-i- p. 77. 3. LeRoy R. Hafen, editor, Colorado and Its People (New Your: Lewis Historical Publishing Co., 1948), Vol. I, p. 465. Carl Ubbelohde, Maxine Benson, Duane A. Smith, A Colorado History (Boulder: Pruett Publishing Co., 19721, pp. 224-225; 228-132. 4- 4spen Times, January 14, 1937, n. p. Shoemaker, 9.11. -, 43 -â‚¬- -2.- 2.2,4>ly â‚¬nkÂ· 4 --3 . I /2 . *IJ:lt/Â«1 - --*</Utllt 7.- j '. - V. 41, . 1* .AI b B <46<#j/29&:- Â£#4 - 414<66' - 'Â·- *i 44%1=,r - = P , - 1 - , .'1"4* â€¢11 6. GÂ»-:;4:=1.4 . ..r. 44, ~S: 4 -rr - .. . 9 ..4. ' r.Â·a 41 - / 1 1 . , - Â· 4. -1 -2+1:=b-=rr . . A. , '-- .1 .E:,E~~2~~~B & - *dEFFH / 1 I T- 7-'- :2-f ullv : a. - ky 1 '4,GE . i:=t, A .. 4 1 . -I.I.- -- 1 1 1 , 1 .. . p I " - -1-42/ i - 1 /1/ -01#~4, rl=Vt,- N- I ....... / '--- 1 7-1 I #AS)951&151%=370'KreÂ¥". 4 Â£,P t91/1:ELK//916:Ut-/4.il 1 .r i, A:,1.-.,Zy' / di/'w--4.- Li- al.J . ..1 1 - ,/,7- //I,= ,~Ag--:464**' . -- 2 .......2 . - XEi'=-~7--D .:~, a-.4 -, de=.=&72 e - -/*22122 r,3 , .111=,L.- .4--t .... rt , I -1. -- :,Abli/0421//Fil.:01fiXilimif::1/7,/126;1~1:ri;i:El/t:/3/lill..... I --.- 4 - -2*m.'1 r. i. - 1. ..e . c-- ~- *-:tl" 5 ''e Â· Ait., - W.*inr- 07rrd-':.-M= -_ 7/ . --1 . %-- -- 4-2- -- -ist. - - /~/64/1-- .T.4/16*<A/"7- e<L/EaIJ/V- - v. 4 I *:ififit-2/75**** Wkr . ~ f 12#,1/4.*~trd *2~"bah'-,2- -37 -g . ---=- --Z'.':. ...ke.:6.- ..f W..3.~14,7-1-/4/-40, 2,*9:2- 7-:. . -- I Â·Al- . 6:5 ,Â«., _ I.'lc. - '._ A . ---t 62 -Lidirwe %,9 + e/*23% --alli- 2 *, 3~'â€¢,- , â€ž I 7 . Â·,rÂ·,2 r'lrY/a 4*Â£92-* 33 ' h 4â€¢ S. . $ 7. -2* - -. 1,â‚¬- rÂ·' - ./.in*Fil 4 946 /~ Â· - iA-,4*411*9754- 11 9 Â· 6-//1,fi/2..2' 4 / r. ... Â¥4,2,29-â€¢, t,e.%= - f f 7/0- I 9 42 ' 2. 17- ....1+44- irk 2Â· . -,2. I .. I 22--O - 4 7.-:er, 2-1 5. :f 3 .f. I In,â‚¬ , 2 2Â«3 . E- N. ..#. W.- 3 1..-. .14= 1 %// , 4: A. F $-Â·-- h.. /4 - *59/&*H *-4Â·qp -#Â«z:jigahgd-~i --fil~:'29 7 -- jty +0 . C 1 232 -r- 33 .~23 - . 12, - -Jes/reticÂ¢cuÂ· - C - 6.- 1 - - lailâ€žj?7â‚¬E~ - - I + . ) 4Â·~ Â·'.3/<14 58#/p'#ygi- 42%290/*imimpfc * - I. .-/1,~ES~3-Aan'.Lk- Â· '- - - . '~99%3~~ u mikv~*4**33Â»44.,0. 43%.~12 - r . :22.1493#-4, 1 14-1-99~. . ?<P..1>-L-- I , 3 -' -24".7 1 *. 344 94- 6,1/ ' * 9~.A 1 \\/ i ) 141 1 4.M \\ 4 ~- ~77 - - --- --7 =7 541Â¥,a-,bri,~,0*.-9-te=,ive,-4- i . , R'LF<Pi*li#/4 $ 2 ' v 23 4 4 ~ptzl 0 ST. . b i k -- ==2421 1 2/72 2 2 --1 2,2.-, * - - 7- 22d' ~- --- - -*34' 3) ~ r ' .. C . 1 1 i. E u --1 .... r--1 0 1,1 2 . m A N 2 8 -1 1 0 to r 7 1 l. -24 1. 0 .D M 8 - A 2 0 + T l-rn 31Â«41 f 1 9~ f 4 11><24 1 -- - i . 3. .1 --- CÂ© 75' 1 4Â£ i E I * 1 .0 .E,1 21 1 4 -0- -I .'ll-.--Illi.- --,11 -1- r = t== t ~ t=t =1 t: ~m t~: tm -~4 U 12 5/0 572 57 6 N 75' --- 0 1: .3 r 1.- 1 ! i N 44 04-2.1- 0 -- -r ----- P- --6-73~~ il . .f 8 3 7 b t *1:J . - Lt--9 - ,\%?p Lz__11 -' 6-31< -1- 11 42 11- Â¢\ [9 4 . 1- 1! .. 11 .J - 9-22 --1 .I - Li -r- 0 2.1 i 19 4 N 74 H 4 2 2 2 1 11 h k R 9-=31 h k 11 5 -1 41 ; J O - LJ~374 -42 / \1 : f - 7. i. =4 . ovt#â€¢.2>><*L 11 1 ro - 11 4 !17 2 9-/1 -1 2 -. 1 Li-2 11 L/- I LIUl It 4 -04*4&144 . .El 7 .-1 - i73 ,â€¢ru-- -J/1 ' ooP 0 10+ ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONIMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8.1997 Jan Derrington commented that he is willing to look at the color selection and work with Staff and monitor to come to a compromises thai will be agreeable to all parties. 234 W. FRANCIS - PUBLIC HEARING Gilbert was sealed. Jeffrey did not vote on this item. Amy Guthrie, planner stated that this building is on the national register of historic places plus being a local landmark. The back of the house has a carriage house that is not historic and the applicant desires to change it back to a garage, add some dormers and change windows. Staff has no concern with those changes. There is a wing that runs between the garage toward the back of the house that is partly old construction and partly not. An open breezeway will be constructed in the new part of the wing. On the historic house the proposal is to add an octagonal kitchen on the north east corner. It is one story and does not damage the architectural integrity of the building. It is somewhat of an omate element and the house is a simple detailed house. There is also a proposal to extend a dormer and Staff is not in support as the dormer is original and visible from the street. It is too much of an alteration. The smaillean-to will be returned to its original state, a shed roof. Scott Lindeau, architect for the project remarked that the existing historic dormer is proposed to be extended out five feet which is in the attic space on the least visible side, the north. A dormer proposed is to be added to the guest property. In response to the octagonal kitchen if it was squared off you would loose the views too much. It is also dark and the ceilings are low so the proposal to do the octagonal adds more light to the eating space. The majority of the board had no problems with the proposal. The octagonal kitchen is a fun new element. There were reservations about the stair tower proportions and how it pops out from the building. From the - - 14 5 . 04,7 \\0 6- O ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 plans it looks like the stair could be moved back so that the dormer could line up. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve the proposal for the minor development. partial demolition of 234 W. Francis St. with the condition that the applicant look at revising the rear stair dormer so that the wall aligns with the building wall below and that more research be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition ofthe house to be approved by sta# and monitor, second by Roger. Discussion: Gilbert recommended thar the extension beyond Ihe building wall be eliminated. VOTE: Passed 4 - 3. Yes vote: Gilbert. Roger. Mark. Suzannah. No vote: Mary, Melanie, Heidi. Those members who voted no felt that there were too many changes to this important house. 334 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Amy Guthrie, planner relayed to the board that this house is on the register and a local landmark. Ten years ago the owner, Marta Chaikovska and Frank Peters got ali approval for a remodel but the addition was never built. The extensions are now expired. The public notices are not completed so the meeting will be a worksession. Phase I was the remodel of the carriage house that took place a few years ago. Phase II involves additions to the historic house and a garage which faces Third Street. The garage placement is in conflict with ordinance #30, which requires garages to be placed on the alley; however, they have always pulled their cars into the existing space which is a paved uncovered driveway. In order for them to add a garage it would have to be isolated in the comer due to the vegetation on the alley. The garage proposed is a one stall garage. Staff is comfortable with the proposed location. The addition is a glass sunroom or green house that is quite visible from the street. It is a one story element. There is a one story addition to the back of the historic house that was there in 1893 and 6 4 84-ry 1,12â‚¬ 2- 1- d. :..ER-7 :'BTFV1(743f/%. A. x .. a "l 6 - Â·-f--0&7 5.4%44*925~ 'FF'PaEW/351359/&:rze)&12"2, "*41&98%~F ims*~d,W#CM"/11/ 1.1 1 .i: ~..4 ID 13 ..01 :.39 4,7,12.4 : _A Fi.-1 - jf:'; t -r' , ' 1 : '11* .1-i 1 / Â·44 ; 1-. . 1 - 4 lei.J actiaLLit/$ // 1 94+4 0 1 4.1...4 :-1-1 * -.. ---- -- 40,4 1 -4ft ~..Â·-4 ~-3 Â· Â£*Â·*& i i . 17, jit, Â·-i 5. \ . * '44 I. . ...IFIRE"pttl=m=ink 1 t - .7 7-- Â·Â·X y Â· Â·Â·1 1 i Â·I 'T f 04-*-1+11-4-1-*i-- 111Â£-1. ..=..,1 i t. --I ....... Â¢,AND 4111** t --- -AjW. \ I l 11 ; 1 1 ~11'J ~,1. / / / 11 -4.1 t.-trÂ»~- REW Wlf,VOW _- 1 45*1 ~ i. 1 - ..... ! f 4 ' Ilr---Â·-ril----Â·----,+ 1 --- Â· t Â·**ad Â· 1 . U 4 ...I I 1 -- IZZIZE--f i - Â»t-7-'"~- -4--Â»--7,--~4 **PI=g.' 1 K ___-1 117#084 ------------1 - 9*241 1 1 18- ' , 42"le.,4 4 1 - ;*43.3 2.:r 4 1%- - â€¢ - 1 i q â€¢ 11 1, $- =It Ii' I 1Â·It y :, 1 - --- I.-I ---- ~.2-- .4 ---18 AR-2-2311, li---41 . ......4.---*-4 N#W Win 1 --Â·- _ [t- . 1 N Iftl--=f i -Â· 1 1 -s.--...1.-41:11 ' .. __.-- ' '$-- 1 ' Lid 1 Â· : 1 1 'TI - -- 2 1 Â¢=--8#tÂ®*W~it gt-itÂ· TEÂ»i- 1. 1 ~ 1 11 1 1- p_ c -i .c L.2 Â· . . 6. ..0. ...... .... _. -1 , 1--*... .------- -----.: 4 1 -4 i e i : 1 11 1 1------4 1 Â£ f-I---,1 ' 1 1 1 -- 0--- ...4 -L_+ ., 1.1*..------.-'w-* -'*.--- !1 -. ~'-Â·---- .----,-----*- â€¢Â·Â·---6--Â·Â·Â·Â·4---- Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·- --Â·. ...--_ 1.- - A 1 I f-----------428@W W we~, _ 1>eva. - 1 . /161:1 .' I 1 1 1. 1 ?. R..7041 1 1 -F. 1-2--- r---0-------- 9%.O 1 3) 4 W 6 4 T 5 6 6 V. A T 1 0 M , Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 4 30 September 1997 . 16... 12 4Tt *-'' 1 . 7.-9. Lr,=7 Â¥- **/94".~.45/%15*51 - O.*ABES#*tw9*16/V/"14--_titp"/*~W"/1 'Al./.Fr / 7/,1/limi -.'. 444,8.M.XF,4. '. <, 4 â‚¬ X.â€ž5:rlâ€ž --/.-. . 5n~ . -Â· ~ 6 W Â· 6/Ful .->**2.-~ 4.-2. *12.23 qlimill/al'lit 1 /63/14 J . 1 ,..~ 1 L i i ~ + Â·7 . A . 4-'.--- . N . ~ t.t,W fomile~ 11 - -Â«â€ž:-il_ --- 3 --1 ; Hl Â·; i :&1+--- Â· f t-- I . r i. 1 2 1 .1 1 Â¥ 1 1 .t 1 1 T ' - 1 - 1 Â§=7 Â¥V iG ----? 0 0 7 0 .4- 5 V~-2_2- .4 -0 o - -" *--*-- 1 D-~-TA IR--- 9, 1--,7-4-Â¥-- 5.- ,-fi . ,Â¥'Fi-_9 ~9-- ~9- 5 A - M r 411 0 t .2 -i--1 1 .. ./1 ... 4/ -9~055â‚¬1 ....yb, ~â€ž~~, Mullins Residence .â‚¬.4 , 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HI'C . #9Â·li- <kli.~Fl>t.-'.. . : 4 :. â€ž-, T . Review u - 18 .Â¥iÂ·- â‚¬4:iÂ· . 1. â€¢ 30 September 1997 â€¢f. i./ F.'- I A 14,Â· - / 4.'vi'YaNj#~2 9 6~01:t..â€¢Â·TÂ·*~344 . , 1-7 rETIJ' 144:Â·/ 4 â€¢ . rÂ¥*j Â¢,rl,+ Â· L . \\ /10\ I . ~ i + 1: rr~1--~ Alew Â¥01 mÂ«t i ' *41**4 -....0.:==:sE---it + %3 .t~~29:z> / .... \2 _-_~ ~_ ~- p:ttl\4Â»0 xx 14 111 d .'42Â«49:ZX , #*A 504*84,4 8 0121.Pe 1. - , , {, 1 k. --- 7.-~U 1 4- 1 . , 4 - i.\- - 1 - -- 7%4 7., -4 1 \ . 1.-755/ 1 - W . 1/1 . 1./. 4.-4 .. 1 \ ...4/ 1 - \4 d 4 + ' 1*â€ž i - MOP.* 4 / " r L_]1~ 4 ~ Â»iwv.1 - 4 -" 1 74 i 1*,7 ~ iÂ·11 1- 0 } 46 . . 2 - T"' 7 6: '-!f-11 ~ -- i F i * 1 B 1 1 . %4 - --- t Mifed ' , 11 1 1 It . U. , 1 1 - Rt.. 0 . 1- 1 ~77 ~} _ 44 7-77--- f it * 1 22 of#H , ' 4,70*". , , , 1 --- I- 1 0,4 ..9- 8*014 M~ . Â·-.'M A 4/4 1 1 1 , 1/2 # 8 1 :Â¥Â·A . - r j 9 g o F O--4--2 -v ------*-i-.A-'~~4â„¢~~~ er t -.- 5 -4 6 .V M T C 0 M 4 1 W . 1 1 4 A. allins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 1 11'llit 4 **Â¢~*~*~Â¤~~~~p,g~...~., .,.,j, . ,.,..,4~,4$439_.1;91*'hg . Â·Â·':#'Â·-*'~9~~9~iw-kt*~ ,c C.)<mt*f~*~~*~~~ ~~ . .Â·Â· I.: '' a, ' , 4 I \ 1 14 k -- , ~~ ~~r2â€¢..p. i - 2 .4 P ' m inih 111 111 114 , ,1 4 11 i. ' - 111 1 -4.+ 1 1 r 4 .111 :.Ii il: id ,. hi id 41 1 *' i ! IL__11.1 1 1 f Â·4 11, .----9 + ,- F 111 lili liftill 111 1 11 7 it + .---- P --1 -_-devj MAt'50 PLÂ¥*L m 4 1 -~-=:==t:LÂ· ,-7121 1 1:ltrt-Â·813-Â·Â·-zz:r , :1 , ..12- I --*-*..-/*..-b*.*- *------#I-/--1-/* I M /1 ' . .A 6 -------p--- - -- -------*--. - 4 til '*._-1 - Â· ~ . ..4 7 \ /1 "- 1Â¥.0 Â¥ 0 , 'op - . -19. 1-0 4**temNP FaA--1 l Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 7 /0 30 September 1997 .al, 4~:a..=2= 19...:Â¥ . I. .. >1,1.... : 4. tÂ· , 1 -ft. 4, Â¢ a t. . I . '. : a 4 b . A 03.- &' ... J- '."*Â·7.7,~ 3/ -,1-- :79Â·.:177,7%.---.4--'2*.:De-*-:-,1.e. Â·'P .*:I':*- I' ~ A ..'AN 24*20.- 1:84Â·fit;t.--feÂ·,I:. utlitÂ·~*3Â·*...; j.:.:.* . Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street >.Â· 4,-*: 5 ~ A Aspen, Colorado 4 E Schematic Design Package/HPC Review i 30 September 1997 Studio B Architects /2 1. 555 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 1 0 ; - I 1 ..- -: 1 in# 44 .R+ 31 -Â· . Il. 1.1 . ./ .4 22 -0. 1 ..... MCI. :I- - I ' r r. 1.-An. :r.: 4..28.-, .. -'I--13- . . 1.- 1 : ./ ' , I . . 4 .1.104 + . e $ Â·Â· e . 9. 'f:': 5, 1 6 .1 1 1, .., . 1 ' /"Iliktillm/ui I . L .: .14Â« ~ '..kÂ£ % 1 . â€ž-,~,~p~~- 3.-- -- r 'Â·*E~~a~~*2FZr -- 4, ..........Â» . F K. 1. .. 1. I ... .... ..... t . Â· ~.~TI~ ,# . . r 9. I.I.,297.1 - . k. - . 3- 0* b 1..1 8. 1 1--i .1. ' . 21 ...1 : I . 1 . lk. - . f,9. r, 1 de..; '.' -ii !.4 ' ., ,40 ..L I . ..... ' I.'/f i.}it.-i 'Â·Â· Â·0:..~Â·Â·. r 1 ./1 . -4 ' ~1. r 9 - . - > ..1... t . .1 Â£-. . i ./ b - ;4 - 'k. ,,21.. . ' . . i + .13. i.64 , ... + D :.. '11 L 1, - - . .. 1 k .A !6 4 . , , -t .' 1. % St P. + 1 4 r C c ./:14 1 1 A- - 2 W- , I :1~.t g.:. 4 Â·Â· v . . 1 . 1 - v- 2/ 4 t..Â· 0 Â· 4 . <94 4, a 9% 4 j 1 ':r \ 1-l. . .4 ' 11 . t. J . $. 1 \3* L r rÂ¢ - S 1v . ' k 4.4.- I .r , - ~:ItT -1 . 1 ' 1 ,Â·*.1 rd Â· 4* . ilift V 1.\ / / 111 7 1 , t/- . . 1 1 + . 9 .- r , 70 . - 4111 4 ; I - I . / 7 .. tor- tteÂ·--- IÂ·/ .t c.~ 0 . .... - - ..... . I 7 . I ... .2 9 . I le 1 e .. , I -4 4.-2: :41 :8& .- ... 110 1 - Mullins Residence .4:f ' I .Liq~ 1 / 234 West Francis Street ...... -/..3 f 11 - I . E I Â· n.3 u Aspen. Colorado C , - 5 . I I f y.\ 1 . . -- 9-8 . 470 >te.40/ 1 h t . , 4...... 1 1 1,~ - -0 lu.{04 : 2 42*4, i cÂ·*at ,,~ ~ 30-Sepelmber 1997 - 0.2 'i *..j. til' - ':. + .6. -Efr 4 f.+32- f..:. ... .:1 y . . /-0.9.5 0.4 .. .4 . ... %1 . 1, .*1.. 1.-74': 1 y-Â·.i... 12=-6-*- 4, RÂ· . , ~_ t-f- :~~~21=~ . . allge .,F#' -4-38T ..t. 3> . Fr~6 -:r~â€¢e*t~""~"~F"-9.71.~ Â·fvr-.g -- -r--r-.t,u -- er"- 1 1 -1, / 0 0 1 , 234-7 32 'w. , , s.- i :.... ..15 1 , 2 4. :.-41*. . Â£ i<' 4 - - . r - 4 ...2....... I . I .- .-'.54660%,ALL.~cbATEJ'- ., Ve.2,)49*t~:- , .. 1.93/,1,& 31 .-./1/2Fi,U.-Cr-: Â· - Â· 21 '& 1 $ ' 0 -,3>4. -2 .. n . 3 - : *84 . . . 7 ~ 4 .... I , I. . '' . 4 ' -*- - . "1 - . . 4 ... 4- . 9 4 A .. .4 1 --, , 1 ' -- .4 .7 -Ii -, â€¢Â·Â· 7 . 1 .1 - '' . A . T th..1- -- . 7 --- 1.- ' 45.2 - | p i I .- - .. . ' 1 2Â· - ... 4 1,0 .141 j . . '' :* i 4 4- . I .. â€¢ ./: -I: I . . - ........ I 4 - k . .1 k ' :f . I. i. . Â¥ " r . Iu,-- - . .. ~ 1 ' - -0,. : - 1...1 l:,:- , it):' 'Â· , I " I . . I. I - 4 1 4 - - 4- r . I Â· . 1 2 1 .- -. I) S. . 4 A - - '. 4 47 C. ;3 , - . .f p, 3 ' * 9 *.4 N.* 74 .: 04- 7 42 - - I. ..,01 , 1 11 ... . 11 , . ' . 17 C.; 14 '. : I. I :: 1 -- 6 - a I r 1 4. 64. . , â€¢.7 .... ta 4- 514 r- 1. 2 6-1 . ,./ ' : 1 I ' 4'21'47 0. -t. M- f I. . , f . I 4 -71 - 1. - , . ... ar. Â£ I I .. ,.A . ..,,. 6. - I I I . ' . . :.44 . I . u. * i .1 , . .. : 4../1 ; i. '1 r. -I Â¥ Â· a. -- 3.,-41 - 1 4 , 0 0 42 Â· 4 . / . 0 - , 1. I I . -. -2 - I .A - , . S 1 I. - E R â€¢ c , . 1 4 . t .1 .6 + ..3 - 1 ". I . J 4 . 9 . 1/ I I '1 ., S 1 ...... * ' , I. .. . 1- 0 . ' ' ' I . L , . 1 I. I 1 .1 .. I I . 1 J r .1 // 4 ./. -1 ' '. .. 4., f 1 - . 1, ' .... k -4 : I .CÂ· ' . ' - ' 1 - 4 . 1 -1 ... 414,3 - . . '94 l42 -*:â€¢,2.<~Mr'.gur tÂ· . 4. S L . . ./ , I s w- ,1.. I . 16. I 2 . 39,1.*'- - -J : ... I , ..2 I 1 , -; I .1 'Al , . I . ' - f y. . J If - ' .. . 1 4 - r k. ' . 1 1 '11 S I . A- ./ . 3 .r- . , e *. < I .4 , 1 ' t. 5 - Â·,4 ' I J .r IZ=75 . . IZ- . 4 . I D ' -&* 77111--1+ . ! Ii I ' l B h . I â€¢ * 9. Q, - r r U.: 1 , - 2 + , .. . 1 f I. . ~ - iii; 1 72 - 1 1.f:. 3 4- L . -/1 . ! i r. 4 1., 1 - 4 4 ' . w b 1 - - .-:- f b a .1 1 14 I /' .4 1 4 - , 9 , -. - ~ ... 0 .. 1-- 9-ir -. 1 '. .. â„¢.- .1 - ' . 'il, - ..S : f J 9 -:311 21 *'44 , -.. . 3/ .Â· e . - c '' L Â· p -â€¢ â€¢, n 4 -I I - 1 2. I .'t I - 1' .3to 2 2. 7, '. e.- Â©~Abld . I I . 1 -\ 5008. i~ - L , - 41 . Â· /49% -- I. -' I .. : 1 02,7Â©32* 1 *Q ' . V 9- f 41 . 3 3 . Â· â‚¬5..ft:,izz,4*tsba -K , ' ./ . t. 'll.4 . . .,9 11- lyÂ·,rxl92Â¥fl ;, 6.- A 111.,"... 4 - I k !1 ILLA*%*49; riv . <' <11Â«ENe/,4* . - L. 6 i tt . 3 -: 29 A.: : 4 - '.1- d - i. tti ,(,:fM ;" ilt\L } .12. ~ . ~ , ~ 1 , 1414-4*lf'Sl ;77-4 . 0, - . Â¥ I 1 F " lilill 1 1114% / .:. 1. - ~ 21~lilif4lill 11,0 i . - I -- - i f< 1 11 It! 1/11 1 1 1 !1 IL i 1 0 . . .4 I M . I . i 1 11, r \/ 1 2 1,114 1 11 4 91 lili ' ;.' , 4 t~ ~ ~ ~ ... 04 1 Tti - I . 11 - 1 1 . 1 hi 4.11 -1 1- ..ill. . .., 111 .1 1 111 1 1 1 111 11 : 1 1, I V --, I -' :- L -' . . '. - < *I VM. -.....c.e- - ---34Â»-7 -41-rl--5 -,r 2 1 7 4 -- \ T 15 I %- -0 "-0 Â¥ , 0 < 41,-1 $ . . . *- /4-I * - 4 -1 -g---I.*-#&. .- - \00 \000 '1 . ./ */* I: . I ' '' ... 2 .74*iu';-9 - Â¥0 Mullins Residence -S-'peR,â€ž4%.--I.'. 1. , . '. & , - i 234 West F~bancis Street * ' f ' 4-54'. -, r . Aspen, Colorado, - . , 4 u 981.1 - - F *11*matic Design PackagehIN: ,:F 3 -. .. I . Review ,- I. .a,K l. v . 0 i 6.: . t.il:~4~21 "*ptember 1997Â·t'*1Â·'' :Â·:.re r:yâ‚¬. 1 r .=A , - . . - 41 6 7 '- V 4 - + I W :' e . : â€¢ tt , 4 , .r"li . 1 . .41:04. ..22541 4 4 4 244 - j. b t - - 1 1.* 1, 642. 4/**1.4:re.73 ' I 1 r i > .le 3 - -t: I .. . . - V - 1 I .. , A . 1 1 ..1 . 4. i . , . -1 1 .4 I. ' ./ ./ : P... .. ,_ ~ I ' 4 -A 1 4 ..., :,- F,-,2.- '.~ 41 + ~4, .i*-44 k . .i -6. , A-- - -. - 1 1 4-â€¢ - , V J â€¢ ' *i 1 + u . 41/1- . - + . . . I -. . ...4 - ' - U ./ . 1- . , , I . 1. ifi:':. I. L.- , .. r -1 T. - -- ,. 4/ .. . I -' . 9- 1 - 0./. + 1 I. . I 11; ..' - ... - - 1 fl 4/ t . 1 4 1 , - L I |Â· , -L, t.--1 ' J < 'i 1 . - i - i i 1.. 4 1 1 -il 1 a ,.. rp 1 I - I . ..0 -1-~~T .- r ~ 14 1 1 1 . 1 8 - 2 . r - , /11- 1 1 - 1 4 i . 90Â·, , - 8 , /4 RM i . '.-/09> .r--9 4 % , - T * t/\VI rt<,4 - h i . a - U. - 1 t . 1/- 1 - 7411 11 067,9 r . , , -1 4: '2 F , , f . - ) r 1 -1- 1 1 -1 9 -- .- I.- - 4.7- ./ .--V. 1 , - / : . 'L Â· , e. 0% r -, r I . .. , fet - I 1 1 '46- '41 ~:itt 6 - W 1, 4. 0 -i~3--- . k ,-1 1 - 1 , L---al T , I ..1 . , 6 - 11 ' 1 I ' ' , . . 1 . 14 % r . $ . &..Itt -#. i . r 1 - . 1 1 1-- rve f 04*fr - 4 / . .4 .- , , ' #ruw rf i 0 '1 -'i' T. , - A 1 ' Â·Â·i ' 1 - - .&% I , . . 1 D 1 -0 04,4 V Â®A g 1 ; , Ul,k 4 . 1 - 3 V A. , d-- ...A 7 1 4, -t li UP 1---* J ' ' f 1. r ...Al'.- 2 '4 I .. . I + 4 - 1 .Pr - ., ' 1 . I . , PÂ®VI.#M --- C 1 - 1/ .. 7,7 -.4 A \ t . ... 1-2 - lu..'- 1/ - 0.21 i. t 1- t ..... A r ...P .. . U 1 I C |f i Vij 1 . 1 j 'râ€¢ I y ... IL 1Â¥#igH.. /44 J *t -19, 171 MIMÂ·P . , 51" f*SL _ 4 1 441"'Mill"\ 1 ' Â·Â· ' 11 A .. . -4 & I # I.- A '.1 ( -f r srÂ«wl- - - Ar-Â·'- ' AWO - . - 1.-1 ... t , --:1 9 , t. 49 1 .-' I. . . 9-11....4 - 4 ISTEIF --9 V' e 01*4 : I. y -42 \ 0 - 7 :.... 1 r / M 1-- -Tr , / I. - r. - . 1 I - , L ~ --~ 4 - 1 F .4 - ,. i 1 1 4 1 --ED 01'91#1.ft/90#f i . - --t- 11-0- 14 0 H . . : - 51\/ 1 M N P 1 - 113 . .- t 1 1 ittlzH 7 I- - T '.--*.I- Il.- 4...I./- .1 ./ .... Fl Â«# . 4,- .1 1., f , 1 . I ' . 1- - . i 1 - t -: .. 4. , . 1 ~ - . 1 - 1 - - . 4. , 1 1- - iv 1 24Â·,4 - - ,--Â· 9,9,}t f I ./ .dEX{â‚¬ f IM 40 - 0 \N 6 2- G . f V 6 4 - ' -- .4 1 - W I ---3. F- .-... -FL' ''Ifike '+ O -li J I , N Â·' -4. Â¥ h. 1 MulliniI J Residd*caky.*t *t 4 ~- 1 - 234 , WÂ¢*t, FI~#eis - : Strgeâ‚¬ 4.9 -1 , ... C , -,2 i, 0. d 52Ksl1.~1~,~4, 9 lorado :~~' - ttf. l 6 eÂ¢.,_~ . I ~6 - I. . 1 4: ...1, Â·-' 7,4 . .. : .tÂ·#34 e .: A 9. '1 r 1 2 57 4 -14 11 , r ' 9 ' 1, 7 344 <T)2% 1<4542 vi. I.*f: - 4 - I ./ I L -:5. '2 2-Â· 6 I.ir.44.'LA,4 4....1,4,0 5% 4, 1 *11 :. 1 , . 1 2 , ' ...4 9 , , .4 . 2 -7 .. I - h . 4 -,1 i 4 1 4 /4 ' ' 1 - L ... . er % . .2 ' ..) '. r w . 1 1 I , 1 I. I . . ..' , 1 K . ' I . I .7 I ' U~ - I I .S 1 -1., ~ '' .Th r I -- I- I .Â» â‚¬ , .6 - 3 ri '1 . .1 >. f i.~ . 1 t' -1 '' f 4 ....9 , 1 ~ 1.L, , b . 1 4 ..I e 3, , I 'P I.*./. -7 '... '1 I 1 - 1 4 1 - I. 1 . i Â·11" 4 - â‚¬ %,1 . â‚¬. . ..Ce - E ./.2 ' - . 1 2- . '1 I . . & 11 . r, . i . . , 1 1 .(-1 4. I '' , '' 1 Â·Â· 41 4, . . 1. r 91 , I .4 a . ' f . -~ r ' ' r 1 . e % 1 - 41 . 1:' . 292. . . 1, , ' tit.-/ 1 2 I .4 = I . g /' r S . - -- .X' - - ; .1 4 - Wi 4 * 1 . - ' 90 1-- *. 1 - d tr 13% , 2..i , ,- I le w/ .1 2.0 *fl > - 4 9% u - 1 - 4 74-1 .3. I. --. 1 : & /U-- 1~ , r I' 4, 9> 4. - -4 - 92 ./. 1 1 .A- 34 . 4 , 35:.412,~â€¢<1'-'3*t#+Â·4'*1101 -1< 1-- 1.1-4 3 '64 ..w S f:.fl . 1.44 1, V:.. 14 3 t e ':. ' S *r; -' p 71 ....1.- . ..4 - 2, a , 9 - E.or . i.6 1. . , 1,3 g '3 F ./ I. ./.- . . 1- --- 4 let ' te, ---*- .r -41/ / 9 1. -1 0- 1 W . fo ... - -i \ 34 LY =. E U'g 04 36.iss v Â¢ 1 .-t .3, ., 'UVILL ~ it' U El'* f , I /1 . , 1 I . ~ i '{Â·. t. I , t . -- hipar'.. i I 1Â»NE& ..0 2 - i , 1â‚¬.. , 1 . + u 4.7. u i , & 8~.. r , . Â· 1 4. -- PIRM'., 8 + '41.2,9.1, h - ;23 'JG. .Siza:; I ./ - ..... -L. I .e"C- Â¢4 ./. 1, I . % 1% .f~ ., p. . 1 -p .... aâ€¢:prr i. 2 *#Af i ' $ 4..24; .1 + )134 ,- A , 11 - , 14,1. .4-2 31 1 r .1 4/ 21. 6.9/1 .r 1 , I.-4/,1.-4- 4/H w. 1.7.6. . ..*'4'91 ',1 1 -1 X, 4 4,2.4.t, 'Â·' , I 1 '' 0 1 2:54- Â·ArÂ» -A .9*4 ., 1. Â« , 4 %,4. r*' . L. * 2. ' ..re, I , 1 19 4 , â€¢ L Â£ 1 1 + 4:4 + 4 5. I , .1 - ./. .* 4. I I . 4. r * h ' 1 \ -" . h ../.- 1.'? , k I. -4 r I u. . Ir-. 1,1. , i .4.*4' . --4 6. 1 1 1 1 , 1 i I + * r, 1 , . , .-. 6 . . . . .. '.1 , 1 -- 1,4, , ---- .--- --- ..... -*.. - ' & Pi 'r .: 1. , 1>17 '- 1:11 !'11:16'f 325 I. 1' /$ ' ..GULLL -AL--- '.1 r,1 4-T 44-Â·r-1 Â£2_,-p . 1- + 1 , . I -f.... J 1 1 .1 Â§ r k r a \00 gel L/1- 74 #e,Â£43 ' 82 Pri f... r-------- - 1 t S . t I r/1 ./ - FQ MT 1 I --r. -1 3 I ... ' .1, , ./. I ' - 4 ., - -i r ' I I. , 011 4 S: , -'3 ' 11 'W :': ' . - * . -. # ..1 2.. i ..4 . IÂ· 4 4 r.- 1 1 6 , l, - -4 - 1 , 1- CY . , , 9 a I ./ 1 ' 1 I , '4 .. 1 , 1 I : f . I l . / I ./ /1 ,/ 1, r I . , I i Â£ A. 2,:221 1. ' 3 , ,Ji . I ... : ' . 1 , 9.. - AL' b '1 44 1 74. L f. L66I .lk.3- C... Nel I -- ... .. 7 - e -[ A r S , ,#w'4.?TÂ·.43-ttOK-: ' i . . I f l:Ce .94% t.. t M# Af'. A : ..,r .: : . an 11 -'>;Â·Â·Â·.':~Â· M- 1.-.- ..-9'f ~'*Â»f , Â·w -- '. 7 52'.P~â€¢F. 7 ty . P 41# C . .3 :1 I -~ I U - -4 - 16 1 '. - . . -914 -, , %~11 - - - & . .:1 Â· 2...4 t' ' b . : '14 L= 9 '' -1,=-'..Jib'~% ' - 4 . 1 . r. ' %. ., M I I . I , 4647 Â· -w. t..7/1 11 . .1 - I '6. 4 - , ..3 . .t K . I. . i -1. 'er l ..9 I . ..4- .1 ) - ' I Â·21, I I p - .flt*44 I Â· C 21Â·3* 4.-t.- 2., -3 _ 4 2 '5.-Â· ' 1 ga/,jel.- I '- . I . ' 1 *. 419 Inf- 1 12 .1 , Ldity,4.-r-.,4 . 1 , .26 , l - * - A 9. 42.47 -i '34. tr, ' , 14 41't I. I t . 1 =Y ' 1 1 - . , I .. . MRio â€¢ 1- 2 -Â· , ft ... .' . ' 1. - . -IL ' 1 .1 , - 1 I ./ 0 ' . , Â· 1-3 ... /0 , , - , 1. K J. V r . - 1 1 - /, '2 ./- ./ &. 4 '' ' 9 9-4- 1 1. '9 . 4,1 . -4 - I .4 & . - - . I . . / 1 4/ 4 1,1 . B . 1 . - 1 % -4 . -- ' , - $12 4-3/ . . /- - . 4- 1,- . - I. 1 W , ... I . ' :..V - #- $.+P--.-~. W---...- # . P '---- -- 14 / ,"â€¢ 4 3 Â· 4 , / . X - r/,- - - $ %--------=--u-41----1 t~tr--11 ~-Â· . -192... -F I , &1----''i i -1 .1 1 - ---1 1 .. :Elli 1 1 A-- - 1. - . . 4.-1.1 ... .. 1 11 I I. .- & , ... 11.1,11 1 , ... 4 '-q 11 r t i 1 Ut. 1 - # 'k 1 - i ,----7----7-77-ZEZI ./ 1 . . ' , J r21 1 1 11. lili . 1' , 11 It 1 - :. 1 1 - I .. . - I .. - 'A . 1.4 - . . . ' I ' ' '1/ 1 9 ,Â¥ 1 8 * 1 - I -Â¥*. Â· . 9 liu=ITTIT-73-31 ' 1 - 1 1.16 - . 4 .. 1,1 . 1 1 4-1 -. 1 . I 1- F-- - -=- 4 --1 1 1 (1 -1.-1 -- -'.....0-L - =======2.=It 1 Â¥ 1 1 1 --1â€¢ 1-- 4. 1 3-:I--32~ ~ . 231 14 -- ' 1--.-7~7-1 1 . / - , 1.'ll 1 t $ - 0 I , - A-- -1 --1 1 1 11 r 6- 1 - ' 6 4 -11 kfat L - 1 .-. . . - 1- t '. 44 Li . . - 1 , I. :*L P -- .:1111 . - F Ir i . _... 9 I - 1 6.- - ---r- 1 - W H - . 0 . ... ./ 'I I $ -* 1 i Â·t,il i - - --------- - 1 - h , ./ - 4. .4., , , 1 ,- 4 %*/5147#16 60071--) - FLBVAT?ON j , . .. A I ./ . . '311 1 3 . I IF. 4 I Mullins Residence 4 .1 234 West Francis Street -t,37 1 1 , d .- * 50' ..14 Aspen, Colorado c..1,Â·64.44 w.: ~ ~ , 1. . .. A + l. . Schematic Design Package/HPC -34W1- ty ' :3./,r -38 Â·p. i I i .'63 A .. Review , .4 -4 , 7 ': - ..1 . , alâ€¢ *~ FLO-.-4 4 I 1 30 September 1997 . 94 .1 , - 4 44(. r Â· . -6 .2, V . .. . I , , Â· 31. I I I Â¥ C -0, I - A â‚¬ , - r I '45 Â· I =i__Ab: -- f ' 1, . T . - 9 . . ... - -- . - I. . - --- I, I I .... - 4/ . i 4 1 . , . I 1Â·"# - i .1 41 I .!Ii' 1 - â€¢ P #* ' 1, - 3 , I , â‚¬ ... . 12 4 4 1 . , I I - 4 4 * 9, , .'2 'D"t. / â€¢â‚¬\R .. A.<44-46. , r: :*''7' , MI'l -9.9 , 7,h:, 44. ' . 'n.'t' 49 0 -4-' I .'t*/440 10.2 16 ft , -, -,- Pe- 'r Â· 4 ' ' . 4- 6â‚¬41" 1.. 1 I et ..4 '. .Â·Ogi/4 ....' 2 .6 )f /-. '.i - - . 0 .- If â€¢Â¥'. I. , t' '2 i 9.154" - " . ** ..Y PE 'f- I. , I . f 1 , t . 21 9 :., 4 1.1. , I T , ; .*lAi ..7, f a , lit 1 11 , - 11 LT , , -.=-I. /*...-* ..*1*.-Il.-I-I'.#.4.-I.. - .. 4 I ..- , Ahy/1 ./. -4Â· A--4--j . 1 4 - C 7 1/ .1 I li 1 -1 - ..0 ... 4 -'--4 '.2 r - 1 r---- . - . ............... I.:. #L./ . 4 Â£ . - , 1 31 f - .. - 1. r. 4 - . h i 4 + a \ , 1. , 1 - 16.- - - 5 $ --./.- \1 , ---- P.---- - ./ 1 , // . fll-- -fliji - -11 1 ~ Â·---Â·Â·--- ---- ria-tk_J 4.- L [-1-1 - - 1 i - 4 1. I ,: ----A-----... .â€¢-Â· - --I-- - ----Â·Â·--I *,- - t---- -2.--1._*___t-- _ ---- _- -e--â€¢-~- --r--- -- -- --I - -'â€¢I--- ----- -4.-4â€¢- ---- - - ---.- . .. 1=412â€žL_1- . -4- -- -,1-- . ' - ' --1 r~-, F-- 1 f-F~~~~~~~T I L------- f -1-:---4 . , 24,12 44% . 1 . 1 1 0-/ - 1 1 1.--L--1 1 -4-.I-I.-*-#.*----'--L--4 - I 1 *=====-4 -1 r-~----~~ #1 -111 EZZIEZIEZZ] t.22271 ---.: --- ----- +-Ill--1 - -1 11 01 ,------t ~ 6=jÂ· 1=d- f t- -1 9 1 kIEZZEd tu=*=-4 ~ --- it 0 k------Â·77-----9 1 1 1 11 r--- 1 1 -*r---1 1 1 11 1 | R-~__ *' --- --2- 4 ... 4,. 2 1 --I==22 . 1 It 1 4-- -,----â€ž---- 1 . i r- ----- ----- .'--- ---- A 1 ~ ... 42... , --1 - NI 171-rol E-7-- ii ,------1-t 1 1 r--Â·-7-Â·----r ----__- _____-~ ___~/ 1, , ' -*2=23-1 11---'.1--------- -----1.-; 1 It 1 1 1 F.----t -----*-- --,-4 L 1 / 1 114 i + - - - /-7-----Â·-3 li il ------ -- *.- --- I- -- +I#...-*-*-I..#Ii---#-*... M+ ~-*I ---I-t------*-- -.-#il./.-I-. E &2 .- --J---*- -WA----4-r-1- -*--r- - , - + ----' =--* .-v- --- *.'- -.-+- x.*tr:'irir.--*r.:t:::fir-*.-r---.4-----.4--2,irr.#--*9***---~-fic#4--'.*.-*00--#--rey -ILI'r-se*un2=~9= 4-.#- . --- - 7. . 4 . I . .- -y- 49:/104 - . . r. 4 1 I. 2 . . 0% . . - r . Of .r 7 - 3,0.1 k .. 4 r > ., r 1 / 4 9> .:. f.: I , .... - I ' 11- I 1 4 /1 -0 - I + , I 44% 14 I i * 1 5 k h# I . -, - 42. :261 - '4 - -* ,- % # iR ''I . 411.72 - . 71 Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street S. 2 . .. 1 - 47 4 , ! Aspen, Colorado . /â‚¬ 1 . ' Llr c, . I '. , i s h ' - - - -t/:,4.1 Schematic Design Package/HPC 4 4 ./ - . Review .. -0 ' . . ':/455 ' M A/30 30 September 1997 .-t . . r/4 1'#74// 6 ' .1- 4 ..ksz. . E.,t ..r' S,# I , .. , 6.- . V ..r 1 I , 1 . ' ~9772,31 " :i. w -:I . .A m .J *96 .. :,- ; ff&~. - 4-. 4-' 9,'Â·,1, *-,4- - L - -, Â· - . Â· , .- Â·Â·Â· : 3, I A ..97 e. It 1. ' . 1/ k I I: Â·:X.-I.. *, :' , - ' i - ' < .2 1 4 ~L '~ r '4.4., ,./ . .9.1 FY, ; 1 . -7 1 -9 1 . - I ". '.K I ::./.*.. : 3 - ...1.1 '. . ..â€¢ - I . Â¢ Al:.- .1, .,1 0 : f'%~p .Â· ...-4, A : - , I ~: -'.: /'. -.1 G .*:11 -I' /:...17*ix''t : 4, - 1 . 3.- ..#:. I. 1 :1.1 0 -4. I * . v ' i Â·49.5 .er .4 1 - I. I : 1. - .Ii- . , i. ' , - -4 7, .rt I : . I . . - I I , ' 9 - *4.f 4..,vi-~.4 -.- Â¥ - I I - .7- t.' # Â£ 01 116 , 1 I /3. ' 1/F 46 -44 ---- - 'V : 6--9 re I - 1 ' . ' '. * , â‚¬ 3 4 -4, 21. 1 + L . . ':~ 1 0 . . . - z ..... .4. ' , , . 1.- . 4... : - A. ... . , 4~1. - . I - . b. e., ' . , I /.,1 .1 I . l: I lai ... 111 I , ''Â£*C .4.44 - 11 ..24 -,E ' . 16 , ./ h J I . I . ... . . , 1.2:.2.- 2,4,, 14' 9.- I . . , 1 i 41, . - .1 9 - ... ' ':* I -1 . I ' .... - 0 . ..1 ./ h ..F..4 . 7 .5 4 ' I - . Â£ .I 4 : / *.r . ' '' f.. - I . 9 . 1 re :. 0 .pti . I ..... A.1., t.fl .. 1 - ... ., I , 1 B 1 . % , 1 I I -11 - 1 *. : v. : 1 1 '1 . -. , .1 1 I F '. Â· 1 . rt I f , I .'. . 0 b . ' 1., J . '. I I. , . .- ' 370 & I ..2. - 9 - I., 4 . I t , 37 7 - 44.~ I I ./ I I - I - I ' " c - I. . I ./ ./. . 6 , I . ' r . . , 1 4 k,Ve ... P . ' - I.: ./. 4 1 - I . 1. 1 ./ -0 . 1 V ' . 1 3 5. , . . Â¥ ' - > Â¥ r . . t - . .' . â€¢ - . f . 4 I'll ... 1 4 - , 4.. I . 7. I . I.'I â‚¬ I : '. . -- I. It J - . b . .----- --~ + 66 . -1 - . 1 -7 -4 4 I - 0 1 . \ 4 , , I. .- Z - I *. V . 1 - I I , r L.- 1-1 : I . '~,9 4...1. t . , 41 ' tr I -.:. . I - V %-2., I 4 1 -f= : 7. I \1, - - . -, 4 ./j Zi - 1/ ' 1 1% mill. 1 . -1, Â· , 6-4.- -.... -- . I I - 4 1 i . .1 1 - - - It, 11 . . - Â¢ , r ..AF T. A.- 2 -4 I 4 S , 4 1 - I .4 - I r. ' 6' :. 4 I ' . I - -- - '3 ; 1 - - \ -3 . I-- & 1 - ------ -- 4 . t ,// i i .â€¢r // +4.- -_. ~. .\ 4 1 . ,--4 -- -- 6 - , , 1 + -- .b ... . . 7 4. ' 1 .7 r - ' 9. ./ t . . , 1 L . r 0 1 --- - 44 . -. -.-4-i-. , 7-,-==1 , . , - 1 fl - .1 , - , c , '7 l------------4----- ---4--- ------- -- v ri - -I#;*---..-*.I - -----I-*-//4ll--- ---'----*:---.-- - I I. .c . , 3.,~44 4. ~ U. e - -' 4 Â· *,1-1 . -------10.... - 1, r , g , I -A. 1 2<%-ST/196 No21-21 0.Ler/*770 2.1 4 -2.1 It t-. 44 -i- 04 t- ./ * 4 I. . I 21 . 4 4 - r I. - * 6. râ€¢ -r- .f ., 4, 4 . i - 9 - - -- - $% 1 . . 2 3 1 -! 1 .. 1 1 â€¢â€¢ , C.-7 + '4 '1 1, . , 4 I. , V.1 4.92.t : 2- -r , Â· , 1/'.-' ..f.... 1. P - , 1 ' ,Â· -2 k 1 2% , , 4 . Mullins Residence " ., . â‚¬ 234 West Francis Street ...7 -' , .. ,- -ell I I I . 11 .1 -0 - ' " 0, Aspen, Colorado r. , '3 ~- ' . ./ ' . I Schematic Design Package/HPC : O,1 lA. - Review r : 4 , ' 1 *A Â¥â€¢** :4 ' r f 1 t :.1':St.i â€¢ 4. Ad :imth ,/9.- 30 Septembek 1997, 20'Â¥1. - r. 1, 1.7 1 _ :cr ..1 - . I .# N. I r I ,:f~,/1 9 2 . - ~f U I r ; 7, ,+ '4' I 4 I M, I . 0.1 - 6. r :-5.7-41, . 7 + .... i ./. 9. . 4 1 . -V L - t . :i .. , I - 4 ': . i- . 3 X .al t 4 .7 . ': ,~ 4..r, A..,1 r. , , - 1. I .4. : . 1,1. . I ..1 , - : 3 - I -- ---1 - 1 .1 7 , r 1' . 3 1 f , 4 . 4 . . /2 . 1 ' ; I. I'. jr ~ 1 JJ-f, . 4, 4, . ' 0- , .t "---1 Â»==32331 I , .... - -7' I ---Z-'lik-: I 4 9~777--777-79-Â«i ti 11 -==411 1 it L ----4 1 Â£ 11 '' ' ~ i. __W==9Â£N~-Â·Lu=L - 4 + !11 , 11 111 : i 1 li - /1 6.11 i - 4 -1-J_ 1, 1 i .1 1 & It Â· ~ ' Â· --,---- - W.. . - : 4= 1 - 4 1 - -..Il' 1 -----Ii--'I--*.---ul.--*.I#-#Ill.*---- -*--...-I..j--.---.-I-il.&-.:*--I---j/-4.-I--.$+-$ .-;.--'-**.I.--I.<k..--* Jq-...--.VI***I--*. --.----.-*.--- ./-*.---* . 1 -4, . - 11 1 -- ,- -,1 .. -4 ' â€¢--Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·----Â·--~Â·--Â·---------Â·Â·â€¢------- -Â·--0'~Â· -â€¢----$~1 'T ~ 1~~------Â·----------'-*~---~-~-~ --- ~Â»~~+~~~ I - -*- 1% - - 11 iâ€ž- _-- 1 11 lit Â· - - fl r ./ : 42;il- . ' * 1 2 - &--I. 1 - it -7--~727---IN 1- Â£ .-I--*. 1 ---r-- --... -I! - . 1-1 .. .. 1 1 ; 14 i - - ------------ F=4 ---.i-*I--I---- ...Il -1--Il-'------ ----- ---I-....---A---- -I......--.---I--- ----- .... ...... *-I------, J. 1-14 - = --L- 1 I - - - -1- ==. - .....1- -* -16- -P --*- --7.--- - - -- --46.~ .---J--......6--,-,--9-.---4-.-'.â€ž-I.-- - I . I- I .. ./ . I * I . * 1 . -I ' t'- .71 .t . 4--â€¢ I. . . v q+ 4 , ' 12 ~ 64/Â»17~9'da 2,5.4 Je ./* g-ZE Ve\770,4 6,1 - . -1 . , r a ; p k .4 , 2 1 - . ' 4%., ---I-.-*.Il...*--Il.I.. I--..---- 1\ )it 4~ i ' C .7. ' '60 . 2; & I '0Â· 1 .-I ..1 ./-,241 : ~*' :3â€¢,A - %. I./Â£ W , Mullins Residence ,.t_fÂ¥30. 234 West Francis Street *tik , - 1, BEL Y. t N , i- Aspen, Colorado . 2 + L '' . 1 - I . ~, L . 4'... ?Ar-,/41.-1 Schematic Design Package/HPC * 2 4 Review 7. .Â· # * - $ V- 444% ~. , . .- .. 4 1% ... ./. / J ~16 1~A#lfl. - - 30 September 1997 . 6 ...... Â· - 1, . 4 4 2 4.2.1,. , - I ./ I . '' , 4 3 r. , * : iker :, w 2 -...... :4.-"Al, 44 .' j I d., .. 4 +R .. 1 , I , - 0 . 1 ' . .- . , V. 4 &... 2 - I M I ... .. - I I . I . 74 -. 4./*.â‚¬ - Â·- -/1/. L $ F ..,* j ) /92 , 20â€ž,1 1 - 4 8 ;:07--27 - : ' ' f- 776 ' . , 4 -2 -1 4,0.~11 . , ..., .T, '1'. I: .rig ' I ..+I.W.L.. -.74.. k .0 .2- 2 - r ... I. . ... . 1 I - I 6 /.f, 0 '1 .. , 0 'pr. 0 4.- ' 4 7 . â€¢45 C./. 4 :.4 . .1. . . . . w .0*, -:i'j:i':,4 Â·,i :" . -Â·~ - 3/ 2 %:9: A ,Â·A-**,2.-- i . Â· M...7:Crl' 2 4 Â· . j ' -'44.2-FA:vi. :4 . 1 . I > U I. 1 -. 1-Al . .. .1:1 1- I. 1.1. 1 I . I - Â·L .. 7 / 42. , 3 - lit:#I .''.: 1- ./.1 . I. f 6 .t , . /0 9. ' 11Â« 5 :- Â·~.3.... ; .- - ' 'i ' I ' . I.: . .... I ' -12,1 Â· .5 , 1. f, . AC .1 , / A \ 1 4 1 jf -f-=IZZIEÂ»Â« %1 -Â· 1 L r I -c-/ -1 11 it---iÂ»--\ -, f ,~f ' ~ 1.14... 1-- L ----22>L 1 1 ..2 -- ~-- --2- Â£ - ---- -- 1 k.- ---5: :-:------_ --. 4- ,Â· r I .1Â» ------ -4-4-4-4 L. 2--1 - CH_-HI-Â·-----F-Ef_0.-----Ii-------- - *- ---.. ............ -L .' --- .....- - , . a.-4-- .d- .--#....-:. ---2- Z ...= --... ...----I.-2.Â·-2*-.. -1.....2.--1 -- ---i--* - , 6,<U t .. ~ 1 . }C --71 IN-0-11.10.11 -31 r-fr=ii p==4=9 i 2 ~ .. I I . . . I ---Â·1--4 1 4 F Jill ., ~or Y .....------1 t --- --7 --- --- -4 . - - .... . -4 --, ,-:-Â·- -Â· -*L ---- 4-- VÂ· , _ .- --4--Ir-1 11 - 1, 1-r==it 1. .--- - -1 . IN L [77-3 ------1 t. , 4% 4 -- 1 A - 3 - M H -- --- - 9- ----4- U H .---i-- 1.-1-=--HJ. < I I Â· .- 4*. 9 1 . - ~ 4.- CD w~ ~,4~62/1 1 ~40*e PH>tte,E ~ - 0_&74~4~1Â£2~6~4A-77 0/1 : 44Â«9A*,0 A#F+E ~ . *ts /1-0// - 7 -/-- 0. 1. p. Â» + Mullins Residence r . 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado f Schematic Design Package/HPC Review :- i Â·f. 30 September 1997 0 .- iNiff.gey ' ....14. . P-4. 9 - . i: 7/9/'. 4 :. SL:.1.~ 203 ./""/I/91*liNIMSM Â£. 2 . ... .. t 4 - ~ # 7: ~.1 '~3>f:t M ..% I... >:'7'< .. ./.W. ,#/4/9r---1 4 -15, 4, .1 4 Â·-- : ' -- ./ - .... Â·- '6~14â€¢jM~5w>Â·'r'*- â€¢1%â€¢ Â· =.listk-..il , . 'r,fÂ·/ 4 -26 6/45Â«- 12- 1 ;I*Â·3QiÂ»2319'5~~ '" 7 AV r h . 1 ltvÂ· 0 I 4 1,4 4 Â£ ; ' 0.121' 1 . C~, :t .' 1 4 . '. 11 r 1 . . . - I 4 I .-4 .. .. . ' I 1.4 Â¥ ' 1 + . I / A- 1'.,4?4, ~- - ' I. ./ 1 . .' / 1 -1 , 1-9 KI .bÂ·. r . 4. I , .7 7 -6 -.2 q. I : - . A. I 'l ' .1, , ' -71 . , 2 - 1 - t. . 193..61.41 1 , 01 7-> 4., A,f - /1.'I'j '' 'ly :Â·.t . .1 1 .7 ... I .7. .'.. , d.....:, P - .-â€ž-44' -9 , ' <h. 2. . - 4 .,4 , - - 1114 1 - , * I :0 , f 1 9.-141.21 :t t. . ' I ./*r ..I-- I ... . ] I - Â¢ I A. 6 . . 4 1% I I ---- 0 , I I . . 4 : - , 6 3 . 9.- 0 . p 41 = 4. 4 7. f , . + - ; 4; 94" 1. )2â€ž U . 1 , 46, fe'Â·. $ . . 2 - 24.- 6 r .4 V. ......0 ' r C, . ... F L .- I -I'. - 1 - + t. ., . 4 I I. i ./ 3. % I. , 4%1 , - .1 , . 1 . J , p ..1 -0 . 1 W :'/ , -b ... . I. . IM A Fâ‚¬-- r . 1 j *.- I. , r. ~ J S . - e. 1 . - -I. 0 40 - I ' , ~ I & , , 'r --+I-I---Il-..I'---1....... *.... ...........1 - ............ ....----.-+I'-I-.I-, . 1- h , . , -9 I , I $ . -6 , f .1â‚¬1 1 I . /4 . . I 4 -*-#** I --4----4- - - . , t.. 1 , , k - . 4. Â¢ 7 - . *---i-.I-- -I-..-=.- *-I-.-#*-*/i-P-...-I-* â‚¬ -- .*-- ----4...'--------*.--'/ , i-- ' 1 1- . / 1 1 I f - 44.r 1 . h. I --- _ ___.____ .... _. _........:* ..._.. -p__-...___ ...21. .- --... _,# - 1 ~ L------_- ----4 .--- 1, LL~ 11 1 .- ,[ . k i , - i i ---T -- . 0 K--# -- V.-& I#*.'-i-*----- 7 1 - --Â·-,4 9~=~itE=~fl L.__.-_ . - ---1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1111 --11 1.-//-~ ... 1 -7 -1 Mi I E---1 1 1.. - Â¢ 7 9 4 4 .. 1 1 --*.----.--*- 1 --Â·Â·Â·'--l E 4 -, -* I 1 -40.---------0- -* -.- - *- -.1- -------------7--# --3-.__...._._.â€ž_..~.~___~~~~_~----4 -<. -- L.-r--k-Il q---4- ----.6 -Â¥-----li-------.I----I-/- y 1 - I . 51 1 AT (MÂ» - I & - . *21 wrd- EguavA77 0,9 t O~klkf 4- 4,- /Â»47/ **2054- 97442, , 4.-7 1 -#C* . &=21-. Â¥. : 4.-" ..4 9,.: 'i#- *.4 *,KA.*F - 9,1 '- . 11 I *d I I - 44. . . -. 4 -- 4 ' 11 1 ..4 j 1 3. I , - . . 1 . 1 A . .111, .r ' I 1-4 J. I. I . ' I ./. '4+I . . .. 4 4 I. I C & 1 B . - , - ' l - A 1 4't' # M k 5 , 5 I. - - & I. L 1 + ' 69'E. 4 . . -- t .4 , -4- . 1 4.1 . I Mullins Residence , I 1 .1 , I 1 14 4â‚¬.-1 k , e â‚¬ 4 - 234 West Francis Street - 44 4 - 4 2 / Aspen, Colorado ' B. '.4 + . , lit'. . . .4 . ./ I, ' ~ 1 f Schematic Desi~ Package/HPC : 4 V ; I - 4 . i..,7 . Review ' t. 9 6 . 'r.* :714 1, 2.*t;4â‚¬â‚¬-7 ; 3OSeptember 1997 . j:*Â£*~.' .. , ~* ~ -f' i . 4- 4 -/ 6 .4 . I _ r - I - I - . . . ... .1 I 1. 0 -- , -1141'.A, + 1 B- '* a r 769Â· % I . 6 I I ... ..1 , Â· ./,1 - I '11: .r 2. ., . . .h .6 :, '...., . 4 --:....L'.1...5-6-4 -I. /- ...: I .1. 1 .6.2 -- -~ - I .., 14 #. I I ''' ~i,2 - â€¢ 2â€¢ - ... 2. . , .2 - ,1 R.. . . ... ' + Aft 2. . . Â¢ I .. 4, 2.4 - A } ' V - ... 71.- lei X, : s. . 1 1 . -:'. 4.2'U 'L 44:- *4': . 7 Â· 9-%:.44Â·3'-~ 7-'.- A ' . , - - :1 , ' '5. 'Â·Â· I 'Vt** .. = St .i ef ..1 1 1 , Â· rÂ·4 rs. .: "10 54 - Â·4 IÂ· 9 - , 0. . , Â«r=-1 11 - 1.4 t 1 --- 1 4- p. -. . f. Â· / \ 1Â· . 1 III. - *T:6 1/3/ i \DWI . 80, ' C.J.Â· \ \ \\ , 1%164469 MFW .'ti /1 \ 1 7 . 1 \ 1- f .0,1 110(7,4 49.-1 . i lu.'' . 4 1 i - -1.6 T *.$ \D' ily I 1 1., r. r 1 4 A-1-7 -247>3, 4 ITC, 1 N.3,1 ,>% , :>,4, , ~)<Â·/ Â· , 2 il 'FCÂ¢ 41*41 I ...Ill-. #-.----I-. -4.- i - - - ..... V .1 \ 1 11, 1.:44 . ... 2 = ' *$22 0 -1-= ---at 40~ 21 1 t. .. 1 L I i. 1- i- 4â€¢r le,0,; 8 4*1 4, . fÂ¢ 1 I "# - - 2 2 \Â© i pl *9449 i Fi ' . 1-16 ... 41Â·t:'ky'* 0/411 / Â¢ 1Â¢U, 0 44 1, 91 ffirip . 7- -- \ 1 iN,vvio,Â¢1 t. , . 1< + 1 ' I I r. 7 y - IriI.be#? | - 4 - N k /1.. u 4 i \/1 1,1. 40 .i '1 - V 7,7 1 --4; . \ , ft'.14)(. 1-1/0~ 1- ----- 1 1 VGÂ¢42 i 697 i 1 1 1,*Ve . 4/&.t . 090 1 1 1 4 # I - tfi ; (3 i ... liD .le, , i fÂ«.[W'*644:, 4 -, ! Lk-,1-7 1// rk - .. 1 . 1 3 41. ". ./ .& I . F I 1 .. -r L.Q~ - . , r--h 1 4/ A / ( 1, i .11 1 Fe#Ze#CRA/:*9 i i ' 1- tiale 1- 1 1 1 1. Â· 31 f. // - .. kij v - I U ~3?80*Vi A Y - 1 . -, A. l,91.19,4 - 1 - kM. . . i .., 9Â¥, . I k - 1 Ar- 1 ~ 1% -4 1 Â£ P.. I W x 1 6 1.,0 6 V - 67Â·7Â¢ ~ ~ ~~ : ..- -~- ~.Â·ati . vieed ! 11 . f , , - 0 5 \ I - - 1 Â¢ AL 4 446 i T Â·i . 1 4' K 1 2 ; . \ 114.- V * . 1 + 13 - 4 11 . a '4024 C 014*r J *~lÂ¥' t- r. i . $ .. I. CJ 11 ':1 <-19- 1 . h M.rif .' . k.le I .." P .. \ 1 I 4 ~>4_. 1 1 1 . 71 1 -rr / i 1/.- J â€ž ' 4 fITTEN 1 - 7 ; - 4 - 1 1. .. L. .4 -Â· -=TrÂ· -11 , I ... .. 1 1 1 2 3. 1 . . I * f .. \2 111 i f , Ail' " . . 6- . 1 %. , .P~ ~4~ lir 44 , . n I - U- r . ..- .: . 1. - 1. 7 - 4=7 1 1 2 1 . 1 0. i / . j ! 1 1 1 114/ . i . 4 1, , 4. 4Id1 t .., 6 * ., 1/_ Â¥ R o Â¥ 3 4 6 --9-'~fl- -r-- -3.----flif- 4- 41 - D B. Y .U S Y A-1 -94, 6- 1 -re . -7974...Â·AN:. 70 ..jr... 4 27Â° uMullins 1 Reside*ce 2 j fi k.'b 41. 1234 West i Fiancis Street >*%, . :. 32:0.,02 4 2 ..'. 3:ANASpen; 44*orado *3~; 99- . - 62 .te 4- P ~ . 1*, .22- ...t V ' 'i. Â·*V Â£ 4. ... h .' .. 43 Schematic Design Package/HPC 4 4. p,ni: --- Revilii* 1 I. >-1.e.U 4- . . : . : v . : . -f' 30 September 1997 : u .: . - . . I: -:.:, ... . . ./- .1,- .1 -.. . ...1 . ./ , , I /'. le - ' I., & r . _ ~- - - 1_ ; ~ ~~ ~ __ -r - - #.~lf ~.* ./-W9.. -I#: .-I--.*..r~--~~--V .: : .': .-I-/- M r-~.'...-I r - - 1 --1 h - - a , . 'I- v.t . . ' *r: Â¥ r 797 .,3474â€ž . -cm.1 - - -52- -1 wÂ· 2 1, 1 ~ Â· 1- i ~ Â· + r' 5' ; ~ r . t,.. 4.-6 YN;12~ .9. f I ... I <-â€¢ /1 r . 3% p., . ..F,p- .Â· , . .... . 1,#f* j 'r. 2 ':- . ... . . ' .. 3 . 4 - ..f '.,41 le .., . 2, I. 4 , r,> - A , , , '. , - 9...2 -44.0 r c~ 1 , 1 I. , , ./ ./ .. .....:.+ I.- 6 4, 1 - . * " + r 4 35 , I I ....... t .- , - . ' râ‚¬ .. :': -94 At,- - ... 1%% .1 9 7. P ~,i .* - - . . . , I.- 1 I . t. I . m , .... - , .7â€ž- I - I. lk., 0,3.- . 6/ - * â‚¬Â» . .E ' I - X , I 1, , . . . . , , , :I ..... I . .-r, .~13 # .. 4 - .J. I 4, ...5 .6-t" ~ - 1. I " 1 1 1 7 a l- -4 Â·Â·Â·Â· . .-. . . . le I I . '= J .- I. . - '1 2 ' I. 1 " , ,Â¢ . I , f Â¢ .1- - 4 < .. 1 ... *. I ...9 . . . Â¥ .' -1.1 ..4. I * A w ,- 3 1 .. .. . -I , I ..1 . . 1 1.7 4 7 4. 9 - 1, , I F. '. #: ' '-'4 -2 - .. .. I , ' - ... T , 4. .i I...e 9 -7 /~~Â· ~ - P\ . A- , , 7â€ž 1.. . 4 /$ 4 - .\ I . a. . 4 - 1 / 2-, 1 - h.. I -% \ f.,1 A ' 'I' . I . I I . . â€¢:37 e k 1 - - f \1 17 '1 - . - -7 --h- Ift 14% 7- ./ - , . -t ' .1- -iv I 15/34,7,2~50 . - - 4 ' . \ 11/ . -. 4 , 11 1 .4 , al,9 -1 /TPAC. M \/4 . L 1 ; . 4 : ..7 - --i- -iÂ· -- Andh/bli ''I , fA, . Â· 1; 05 1/ , .- -â€¢ F p X r.â€¢ -$ W 4 1 ~ . f~ 11 /6\ 1 , . s - I '- I f - =-t @413Â»A - ,~ 1/ f / r /1 I : . V. i /4:4 - ,4~ '8 1 -4 1 /- f \ 1 ' ..4-fi 1/07'â€žt 1 * e.,4 r - - & il'' A j . , . - I.k '6 l<~ 7 j- .*.IA ' ..I ,\. - ,4 Mvt{,lf: l A Al##79. $>011$044 11 Â£ I y .- /0.*Nstâ€¢f /F,AAW,Â¥#24 lA' 0 '16&11 ' - ' 1 . A c.imer w ,~t, ~ f V.~ Â¥ i -â€¢r '2 - 1 1 2 , V 7/1 --1.- - -- - -----1 L -~ r . 1 . 4,4 1 10 -1 1 1- 4 , . C t. 1 - I r. r :f -1. W D 31 f I 1 \.1 1 , i.-' 1 - i / *...I- 1 2% 2, L , . 1 1- -1- VAUG'mu Â£ 4â€¢ 1 // . 1 1 I. 1,# . 1 - . '1 - R 1 - . 1 h. t..9.2. p - 1 -2 4 70. 14$. 4 f - ... . 1 2 , 4 4 -Zi i 1/ , - Â«/6///1.14' ~' 4 ., '' t, . 'i ~r i I i j i r . ...'. ,- .... ..6 . 04....., . . r I. )3 - 0 1 1 1./, 4 It . â‚¬ 12 .- i' br ' _ i .fe - 4- 1--*.-'94&--t- 1 / . ., 1 w . :i . . i - 1 LAH---'..4 - 1 4 1 1 A. - 1\- 1 avis'. 41 1 e - - ' L *, Â·-/. Â·,1 j , 1 ; *. . . Â£4- - 1 Cw 451- . 1 1 7/f . 4 t.. . 1 - - .l \ f . r.., I - I ...1. . , + A r 1 1 , '' , 40* 15*91 . i 1.-17 6 \ -- - -t 1 - 4 Dt_ 4-- 0 , ./1 - 1 1 f . 4 , - ,- 1 1 1- 1 : 1 1 4 , 1 1 - 4 66 00 tt tâ€¢â€¢P r. I - Li - 11 1.; 1 - /1 e., , 1 4 ir pic: 0 - - . - - 61*F,4 4 l,fd~Â·f' 1 , * - 0 04*x 01.-40 , - d; , 1 a. ~-Li4*nir~q \/ - -- 0,65*le 6. ,- . 1 * .11 % I L --4-- * 2 1 kt '' ! ~ 64 15/ . 1 - 1 $ i lit - r .,. 1, '.1 4 . - t. .- $ I. , * - 1 - 1 --- ---- -F 7 - , ' r t '-I' I ./ . . 1.. t i I i - -i . , - k 1 j* r 4 4 11 1 A 1 I I f - 'V $ 0 i (D- - 1. /f i ' _ ... . 11 â„¢ 1 1 6 -0- . I - 1. 0 - - . - -. .Â«h I - . 4 ,- - r + 'll A 41 4 /..., -- .i 11 1 . ~ * -- 11 , , 4 , I ? /I9I 1 . . , f , '' d R_ ~_3_._ B 0- F -0-9 ,6, 0 n V Y f' 6 14 - 4.22 V & U I ' . 4-9-94 1 - 0- -- - - , & 4 2 1.3 .7,1,- , 4 . E ry'l,Liat~ * ~.7T,Â·';RfIZ~~~'~.7' , Â· 4-'-vaC: 3 . Â»Al w 1, . ... Mullins Residence / t I - -1 21 4. . $ t,4 17 234 r West Erancis Street - 2 - t 4.24 1. Aspen, ~ Colorado j *9 ff. *2 . .4.19 9.:0243 . 1?214 * .:22% . . ... Schematic Design Package/HPC ~ 0 - , , 4 252-â€¢4- 1.-*4... 30 September 1997 ? ...,~*See24: 1 5 7 . 2 4-49 91*$*BAA* I - -*- 1 - . . C .. < : 9 cp .j* :Â·11-9-4 ,- Â«iÂ«~-* -tik-*3311,3.L..'-:v - i~' . -* el .4 / t' . '. â€¢~tt~ 0, -4 .4 4, 9 4, . t 1 2â€¢ 1 I . - F-. v :**p F 9 :vqr r-: - '~" .. /=lu '~r'r' -- q _ I . 97 r .. 1,64"P. -,C, .~ r I v-9gtp77:TZ,/TER137pV G/:fx 3.. t s-7,77 77#71/17/n-/*14*7bb Ff'F-T~--,~~ 37=ul<7~~-~1='--'77:7Tr~" -0- - ~ - ' ~ ~ 1. ) * V . 4 1. . - 1 11 I '1 . I M - .#1 9-1 r.- ...3 I 'l. I a: 1 . T:* I . . .. I. - ' 71 ..; . - I r - ..,1 ..2- . 14. ,~,-., p~f.~.f-..44.&tlrâ€¢ J Q. 9' w1*., Â· . 0 4,14 6 . I ...0 , '' . 1 - I. . I , N.W -, 2.4.0 'r ; . 2 - . .. ..f . , -'. y . - 4 L - I. .4 4 . .,4 - -'/ I . 0 f' 4 9 . - . 4. 4 - S ' ' 4- .2 r k r . / 0 U t - .. ' / 4- , - 1 . .r 4 i. . - 1 . 1 A I. I , 1 *39 { 442 - + e - A ' 0*14â„¢* **9 442#10 4 %%*% %24@894 .. 1 ....a ' I I f 11 it Q . r # 11 11 4, . '6 - 11=L:=J i .-0- _.r\,W - 6+19*56,9/7 i -- . . . , .r - L , Of il 1, 1 I. I X. 1-8 1 1 . 7-2.- . Untlff .2*#4 3747- ........ C I ' --C . I ./ ' # I "1 - -11, . -:I ' 11 1 .11 -- 1 - -1-4- ' 4 r ... I. 1 1 4 | * L.Li -1. 5 . 1 -Â£_- . .. 1 -'lili , . e 4 , 1. ' 1/ 1| 1[ 11 - -- - i , U l - lilli- ---- 11-lr:'1 7 .... ~ '' . , 1 1L. - li f J I ---'.-!-0.-1.... - _--4 1 T H f-*- -- - -44 Â¥ 11 ' Â·---' ='-1 14LL-lut ,r---4 --' -3 A I- . 1 AP--==d *_ ---#----*-7 -; 2- 11 1 .---I- W--44. T t' 1 . 1 15 1 1 ...4,~ .......................... . - . lili , - - 4 - 2 1 , - ,-7 ----7 -- -- 1 lp------41 19--' g--4-Â¥9 - 1- Un--211!=Â·-.4 I. - . 2 : 4074 2 9001!11 4 tO -. - M/FM 67* tart r +0 Tip -----,1 -0 -f---- --- -. --- - -- 4.- ' A- I ... u.1 - Fe J / - . W , c ....... 1.-9----1.-4- ....1.6.--406,1......-,-4.-e........0 -0............4--042.--.... ..... " . -r I ... . A . + ~*7--77=t[ 1 f-*-1 -Al--4 1 4 . - - ' 7-"-T-Iii ' - -HI p--!,1 -1 lit 1 , 1--1 E-1 ... m I. . - t.... '.............. + . - Mew tArat 04 - - '= .1 -.'- Â·t , 4 4-42, 4=:====66=====;1=====:*U + ~ ---- ------ - --- - , 4-- I ,1 v ' -- ..4 1- ., k - 0 . v --4-fiâ€ž- --p.4-/ 9 -14 -.*.- *.*-#- t 4- -r- _*WI/7 -f * I .., Â¥ , 1 :*.. -1.-=1;4. 14-.-' -. - A I - - U + g I A-/- - ..... - -,4...... ~ 4 ~ Â¥ ./ *------,-A--I...b-/-- .- I A.#-~4-4===HiÂ» + . . '-1-,+41 4=-V..- --. r--0 . , 1- ,-: - g Au - -0Â· 71â€¢- I-'-04 ... * --- - - - --.p- - - 4 > ...__*_ --*-4 -..... 4 -0............... - * , Mtâ€ž.-1--.- .......0---- 1 { .t , i - I 722-2. . . r 1 1 . . 0-,4.- ... .............â€ž.........Â» W-4.-0-- -r -- *-- . .. ....... -4 ./.--.............. .i .*..... -- -- 41. ..... . . . - " I /* + 1. , , i A . . . 64 0- -rw--.M./ -2 r--+-t ---_._.F- 6 22-V.4-~TIOM 76& OF " . - r I----*I--I------Il--Ilill---1--1-....---Ill.i./.-.-ili..I..---~ . e , 41 1 1 , I / , V ' â€¢ I .....:. 1 . - .- Â£ Ir , I I 4 , , -2. r. : 4 I ... . ... ... 4 ... -- .- I 0 -1....3= Â¥ 17 1 2.0 81 , 4 I - 4.. Mullins Residence r. 49 I . 5 '9 + 249 234 West Francis Street 30 1 = -A l.1 . , - : -' - 49 Aspen, Colorado .. i , 2â€¢ *Â·94% 7. .. -l'.11 Schematic Design Package/HPC , , Â»: LA*- . Review h - . 9, V - , % ..:- . :'1%2,- : . 30 September 1997 .'-42:#:1' ..e 4 -' - , 7 ~ 0.*219 6 163116.3.,- 21-?--3 i . . Ji. :Avi*x #v-f . , I I I . .. - . Tt: ' /1 0. '.. . I i. ~Â¥y......./.-1, Â· ....+ 1 f.:,1/.Â·/. , 1. . , . ti 4<4 :inÂ·<Â·,t' , . 4. .... -. . 0 , I . + I.& i,I. .. . -. .--' . . . ~- 22Â»!/in - 1 8. 'll:.. . P; Â·f . 2.4 . U. Â· . .... .. r .: C,>,1 , I . 1 0 1 I. ... 4 0 .111 1. . ..1 Â·1Â· $ : I - Â· :... - ....:... 1. - d I â€¢ I ./ â‚¬ â‚¬ -4 ',12 F :.-; ' .J. - . ,~ ~:i 'i * 13 -3 V .-' 4 2 1--r k t 91 h 4'' I I -6 N. ./ ~*41 .; i 4/ - ; t $7 11...7 r. te ~ ' 4,2 Â«/ -. 39;-l 4..2 fi /0 1 2, . 4 , . -. 70*-1.- f I , 1- .~ 1- I - -*. h J' 1 I,Â·Â·Â· 4.-j' I it 51 --1- fer 3- ,/ ' I E-I' .,7. ...... . I - I ' i 11 1 ti_L--4~ 71 .1, t . . 1 . - .1 1 .Â· . r-Â· 1, 4 -4--for--f , 1 "0 0 - # /1 , . - \ /2"i- 19 0 1 I -- - ..'.6 Â· 4.5 .. 4 t Mullins Residence - 9 9Â» I L.:1. .. 234 41 West Francis Street 42 Aspen; Colorado -- 1,1.-%12. , - 25,1., * Sthematic Design Package/HPC 9; 1. / Review 1.1. 3..i Ctif :,~~ . . *91- . 31.3 0: 30 September 1997 6*6*-4~1~22 ' , . N .*54%Â»am'.1, . , I ..1 ..4 - 1.-' 'r;