The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.316 E Hopkins Ave.HPC8-95Age; i.41 +95 316 6 0-40 4% Ave , 1 & 6 1-rz> -1-7 Howling Wolf Conceptual Devt. cj~ - HPC8-95 2737-073-29-008 % bt R-?- 52 MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer DATE: July 24, 1995 RE: 316 E. Hopkins Avenue, Howling Wolf- GMQS Exemption The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and gave final approval to a proposal to add outdoor dining, in the form of an elevated deck at 316 E. Hopkins Avenue. The proposal results in an increase in net leasable space on the site, but does not affect F.A.R. An outbuilding which existed previously on the site was approved for demolition and resulted a credit of 300 net leasable square feet, which has been applied to the current development, which involves a 151 square foot increase in net leasable square footage. Section 8-104(B)(2) of the Land Use Regulations provides for Planning Director exemption from GMQS for "the enlargement of an historic landmark intended to be used as a commercial or office & development which increases either the building's existing floor area ratio or its net leasable square footage, but does not increase both." Pursuant to Section 8-104(B)(2), I hereby approve exemption of the development approved by the Historic Preservation Commission on May 10, 1995 from the Growth Management Quota System. . C n T. 14 9 9 Stan Clauson, Community Development Director :L. 0--- 131_ AJ MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 316 E. Hopkins Avenue, Howling Wolf- Conceptual, Public Hearing (continued from April 26, 1995) and Final Date: May 10, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to add a carport with a seating area/deck above. The deck will include a bar and stage area. Additional storage and one bathroom, which is required by code due to increased occupancy, will be provided at the ground level, where two parking spaced currently exist. APPLICANT: Two Schmucks Inc., represented by Paul Levine and Steve Levitt. LOCATION: 316 E. Hopkins, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. REVIEW PROCESS: All four development review standards must be met in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: In general, Staff supports the concept of adding an outdoor seating area in the proposed manner. Only a limited amount of space is available in front of the building and seating at the rear of the building must be elevated in order to accommodate parking and storage needs. Building code requires the addition of another bathroom due to the increase in occupancy, and the size of the deck requires two staircases be provided. The applicants wish to have a bar/service area on the deck, and had previously proposed a canopy in order to protect this area from weather. The canopy has been eliminated, therefore the deck will essentially be invisible from Hopkins Avenue. One informal worksession has been held with the applicants since the April 26 meeting. At that time, members of the Commission suggested that the applicants "lighten" the design somewhat and try to find creative ways to relate to the existing structure. The design has been amended to show the deck surrounded with siding, broken up with areas of steel pipe railing. Steel "cords" with turnbuckles will be strung between the rails to meet Building Code requirements. The rail is angled slightly, which helps the structure to appear less block- like. In addition, the applicant's propose to hang lights and plants around the deck. The historic house is clapboard, with asphalt siding on the east. The new addition at the rear is board and batten. HPC should discuss if whether there is any reason to try to relate the deck with the new board and batten construction, at least at the ground level. Six parking spaces currently exist on the site. The proposal eliminates two of those spaces to make room for storage, the bathroom and the staircase. HPC must waive two parking spaces for the site in order for this plan to work. The code requires 2 spaces for every 1,000 sq.ft. of net leasable area. Since the other four spaces on the site are apparently unavailable to the Howling Wolf due to an agreement with their landlord, this would leave the restaurant with no dedicated parking area. Staff has concerns with this, but does not have an alternative solution, other than to reduce the size of the deck, move the bathroom back on top and provide for at least one space. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The deck will primarily be used in summer. The alley that it abuts is somewhat unattractive and the deck will be an improvement in terms of adding liveliness to the area. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The applicant has made a good effort to preserve the integrity of the original structure, to limit alterations to it and to physically separate new elements. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal does not impact the architectural character of the resource as viewed from the street. The historic structure will no longer be easily visible from the alley. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual and final approval, along with a waiver of two parking spaces required for the restaurant, with the following conditions: 1) Provide drawings at 1/4"=1'0 scale of all elevations. 2) Provide drawings or written information which identifies all building materials. 3) Consider siding the bathroom and storage with board and batten in order to match other new construction. DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS <-,5 :0* 209-S Ventnor Ave. 1 fl Aspen, Colorado 81611 Njiw 303/925-7149 Â·Â·.1.~ tf ** 147 Sm#,> ' f?.i.,.. 44Lk'. --1 7-7 1-1 7-1 11--24-1110-1 0--7 r=T 14 11 #0441*Ar 11 12â‚¬ 11 **167 111 1 1 1 11 t-1 ' 7' '... Â»f~-~ ~4Â· '' ".Â·::.~ ~ 434-23. 12*FlaA 1,2>H ~t ~ UFfifFR 0:4-.6 -,2Â·14 e'219':319 :c:#01Â£83 ZA '49....A: 1.~(11:1 14---------A~=~====I=Z==lt 1.P ------1- - ---- 1 Pa#FÂ»kg"T- 418 *91, 1 Ha \*LF APPI Tio H Fa'F. Â· la: i F MK 1 H A * 1 19.81<-11-A * 6 419%, WOFFIHâ‚¬ Ave 111 1 1 i *-- 211911-4Â£31 ~ -0 1 *EN ~ -------1 al PAVEL -- Hgv 1.AÂ»Flot-4 5% 14rk':SI 62221,012. 9'â‚¬~1 HA * 2 l Â»121<INO'**+ 1 1 0 0 0- 0 4 lay L '55' u 8.4,4 1 )1 Fl,do}2Â·, 46 1-| / 4 Ir_@ PLAH 1/411 - 1 Lou REVISIONS: r lrI , 3 1)421 %9 44 /2xx 111 %0 , i /. 4. 6. i f./:.1 .1 11Â¢f- All designs, ideas, arrangements and \\ 1 1 5 --5.17<14 7 .2 plans indicated by these drawings and . â€ž E.c~ specifications are the property and 11 copyright of the Architect and shall -- ---- -------- neither be used on any other work nor -------- - ----- -- - be used by any other person for any - -- ---- ------------ ~ sion. Written dimensions shall take pre- - cedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any di- mensional discrepancy shall be brought - to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work. 1 11 -- - - i ; ' 1 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY: 12 DYER CHECKED BY: ,Â· i BSUE DATE:--' I - Â·*4 6-e-le 0. SHEET TITLE: 41 TM + fl.,2212~ rl-Ar.1 geT- e L- EVAT IOH WAST â‚¬ Le VAT t o H__ 1/4 4 - Ii- 00 SHEET NO: A- 1 ji ' OF-SHEETS= ..... . Â·Â·'Â·.' b,jp Â·al'--- +, Â·Â·1?tf%Â·Â·f~fl!Â· -'3 1 .....dy...31&. / .' i#f ' / 'r IW/Â· DYER & ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS 4Â·6&3 J:Â· 209-S Ventnor Ave. 'Â·< :04 Aspen, Colorado 81611 >'~ 303/925-7149 * f' -~11Â£jtfÂ·.c'i fgH - ,Â£4- . - 2,Â·.1+Â¢.fi*~ 0Â· ~ 2,-+W.4. tffija~VE'SV *- 8045 4 992 461~10% i /;~ 3297fty;YE 1.1 'u'.~,04'~.,4:#.:.~Â·''t':- 4*4,0-Â· F V . j **ct/-Â»r ;4371 T 10 H Prog /54 - 30|* |-|0Â£:AvLI He %/al,p 94 6 401Â«1He Ava FFEr.1., 622 Â»14.11 94 6%0 P I HI HA 13101< AAT**1 9%94 LEVEL FLAN 1/4 Il a 11 - 011 REVISIONS: 1.-?* . -: 44.. All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permis- sion. Written dimensions shall take pre- cedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any di- mensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work. PROJECT NO. 982'16 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: J 6.9-16 SHEET TITLE: 1224< 1-evel, ft.Ni SHEET NO: L 4 n -*4 1. â‚¬*t OF SHEETS , 0 . . . . 0 . .. Aftcl(L 4Â£.4 47 31, ~ r I ~ 3/4, , 3 0 4 #6â€¢'Wa A 3 ll E. 1.40-Â°F k-5 Avc At i- CoÂ· â‚¬1 61< ' -6---C-1..f i 6 0 050 1 -2-7 7 7 c 5 u P - . J , 1 -i 60 4,1 54 .pl2 - 44 * C j Se rot ab (Â£-prt>e- tcrtue-1 - Â¥/0 0 Â°beÂ· FA 1 o CLVE 8 1 - il c E. FlpL 4v< Evt o fit k * i l \P< 7-0.k +0 4-4 0 J WIC U >23 4, 0,4L,r 9 & 7 '3 .4. 41.c r oar L 6Â·~- +4- F'~Â°pr4 . 74 0 w ..11 4 ke 4 eleo'.1-<A 6Â·Â·o> eâ€ž,i, 7 ./26/ow S<47%-0 al,ovi. -CL '0(Â£ L ce>11 L ;,w* ill< -6* 74 +~j- d 'ft-0- AciD , r, .1,1 wv# 11 6 Â£ 0,3 u .\19 fle,=/*j tff,7 I j. 1- 2/wl 6 j/(1-1/ftÂ£ 4-loth - j 9-,0, F coAULL 54,jut JÂ« 1 4- a-1 ~irs' 101 1 11 41, Jak 7,- , 4 4 a 1 1- 1 . C.N..10*T,1.,LÂ£ 17 ~c <- -fu ~ Tk~el -1-. 1/rÂ« a- Â£ w.Â£ 46|18uL *J- -94Â£ U is UL I 2>f<N- 1 7 44' "' 17 , 'Red,4 7,vT - ' ) 1 I11 !Il t :11 - 2 F l tj VT ' 1 49 * 11 ilri T73, ; , rO /\ (2171 j *13 'fr"ef Â£,941 7 11 %9 91'"oct . 1-r/\ - fl 44 ~27-19 j~.rn rol' i '1 1 eV tnt tÂ° Ve 72 P J C â€žClt~ 1- 7-11 -4 LMâ€¢ 1 1 42 184,1 1 +10 1-Â«7 1Â¤91 7+ , f * reA 1 v 7 2 . re< 9 7-n,01 jj rr'- t ' t-10 6 -_- l l.7~'0'0')-1 I V' 1 r-Â° 6-# 1 1. i 0 971 0 , tcv' 9 1, â‚¬-7 - 201 1 11'V' *11 1 L v vre' 61 1 . 41,0:iÂ«l Â£ 1 0(11 /1'l/~ fc f . CM_ /43 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 316 E. Hopkins Avenue, Howling Wolf- Conceptual, Public Hearing Date: April 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to add a carport with a seating area/deck above. The deck will include a bar, storage and one bathroom, which is required by code due to increased occupancy. At the ground level, the applicant proposes a new cooler, trash enclosure, and parking. APPLICANT: Two Schmucks Inc., represented by Paul Levine and Steve Levitt. LOCATION: 316 E. Hopkins, Lot 0, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. REVIEW PROCESS: All four development review standards must be met in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: In general, Staff supports the concept of adding an outdoor seating area in the proposed manner. Only a limited amount of space is available in front of the building and seating at the rear of the building must be elevated in order to accommodate parking and storage needs. The proposed deck is fairly substantial in size, and the addition of elements such as a covered bar area and restroom, a solid wall as a railing, and siding used at the ground level to screen cars add to its bulk. Building code requires the addition of another bathroom due to the increase in occupancy. There is not enough space to locate this bathroom at grade. The applicants need to have a bar/service area on the deck, and an awning/canopy is proposed in order to protect this area from weather. The height of the canopy and bathroom roof are 19'4", approximately 3'6" taller than the historic structure. .. The applicants propose to use a solid wall as the required railing around the deck. The reasoning for this is that the UBC requires railings with a 4" spacing and it was felt that it would be a very busy element surrounding such a large area. Staff agrees, but recommends that the siding be interspersed frequently with sections of railing in order to allow some transparency. In the area of the elevated platform (for bands) the railing will have to be 8" taller. Siding is shown at the ground level as a means to screen parking. Staff suggests that this is unnecessary and should be removed. The canopy proposed over the bar area may be visible from the street. More information about its form will be needed. In addition, it seems to drain onto the neighbor's property, which may not be allowed by Engineering. Five parking spaces currently exist on the site. The proposed ground level plan shows these five spaces in a configuration which is not acceptable to Zoning. Some spaces are stacked, there is not sufficient area for trash or access to the dumpster and the new cooler does not have enough clearance to open. The applicant must restudy the situation. HPC does have the ability to grant variances for required parking spaces when appropriate to the site and neighborhood. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The deck will primarily be used in summer and the applicant has suggested that plants and other elements will be used to soften it. Staff does not anticipate that it will be easily visible from the street, except for the canopy. Any effort that can be made to make the new deck more "pedestrian friendly" from the alley should be considered, for instance using all open rail in this area. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The applicant has made a good effort jto preserve the integrity of the original structure, to limit alterations to it and to physically separate new elements. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not .. diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal does not impact the architectural character of the resource as viewed from the street. The structure will no longer be easily visible from the alley. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC,.grant conceptual to construct a deck with the following conditions: 1) Restudy the parking spaces and functionality of cooler and trash enclosure. Parking variances may -be given if justifiable. 2) Redesign the railing to be a mix of siding and open rail. 3) Address drainage issue with canopy. 4) Remove the siding at the ground level. 5) Provide information about the construction of the canopy and any proposed plantings. 6) Study any ways to soften the deck from the alley. j - -U - i-Â·t.......~I........I-// . ..5.,44~,k==.50'az~,52=,L I $ t 1 - ' DYER & ASSOCIATESÂ· ARCHITECTS 1 1 : 209-S Venino: Av, Asne; -C)!cracÂ·2 81 6.1 * , i cne Â·cr>..- -,1 5 16 LA Cats.11-iA UL, JÂ· 4.- u / 1-Â· L- 40=399Â¥R / Vâ‚¬CAÂ«h rk:;Â¥z~ 1 1 TÂ®Â·1Â·kvÂ·LimiCM=L# B=2112Â« %*3421 191-01 51* E 1-62FKINâ‚¬ AVE 1 -- 1 1 , /6.6 reN 1 27 844. 1 1 tl : 4 1 L 11 / Â·-1 V it ! i , i 1 Â· n'W I - ex@Â¢ 14,122*9 , . F.. 7 f v ' w p 1 F*A r,18 12**17 44 Z'~~~ 1 - 1 2| Millul PhsÂ·K A.K.fz::127 % Av 1 6/ 1 -1 I -- -4 PROJECTN '150 1 5 HAND #AM ACC-15Â·96 - DRAWN B. 12 9Â¥MA i ~ CHECKED Bp 1-11 1 ISSUE DATE .. r 216 , Pfive -uF -4 171 TÂ¢&1*1<.6 - 1 41-TE Â¢LAN SHEr TITL= 1401Â«1097- MAH A j . EN \ SHEET NC 5 'TE FLAH - ep --1 930 - 11- O11 O OF SHEETS -A~.-0-1, APL-9 11 0-fi-,--,9.leq Â· . , , . ~-Z' ).-:..... * '2.- Ir- I. I.-'.-'//-/I - 1 -" . .T.I'- . - --18 0- 0% . / 4 . ex'â‚¬'Hal- M HEsv DYER & ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS - 209-6 Ventnor Avt Asper' 00*orasc, 816-r 1 -0 303 925.7149 / r--r 1 1 - / -- i 6,271- BM. - -PUHFMES Â·9?Â«1<1114*56,&**1 45*PX / pas= . 1 -- ~ FEPI~ 1 . 1 / / , - 1 * 102 5 1-brl< 1He AVE li . A . Aerâ‚¬.1-1, 2> 616,1 i [ 141-UM 114<a . - - WALL -- 1 I .. 1 '12111Ha---Â»COE *21 C C ) 1,M<] t.**IPÂ«*6 -- < ~ _ft 1*\9 Â©Pg:r,vELLÂ· I ... - Â»9 FIAÂ·4 +eue -4 - ' / 5>41*51 Kia - ~- - ='VE m. 1, 1 / <\\ 1 PROJECT NC 01*10 T i UHAWN B, F . Up( '5% rAN 14[144[~*p=6449 i 5 CHECKED BY / 1 4 ISSUE DATE # / / 1 . N . / n j 1 i - T i 4 1 113 lit ct i <3[1&2;ciup L*>/0.1.0. 1 1 ' ~ 1 ~PLAH j I i ,1, , 6 41.o' ; 4 Len i _~!-011 1 1.2(-011 I g LAIII .... 4 4 k r- 4 1 66 L Q 'i i 1 i fi SHEET NO 460-U HO LEVEL- rl--A H 7411.1 LON A 1-...1- -- - ...--- SHEETS , il C';rN-X~-7VEN*-f. Â·Â·. Â·'.- tâ€¢Lâ€¢ 2- U- 9, =*4*,-?>s<.4.2 .2. 0.-4 - 4;22Â£%52:3- #Ubc'X - ./ ii. -I -I - t. i U EA#36Â· d#4Dtri*Â»_ -..f,ah,2 < Â· Â·*4234.. < - rÂ¢-2==plin=r-01==--12=>f~~ 2.** } DYER & ASSOCIATES O -3 0 - 4 ARCHITECTS 1 -flit~---. - - - *-~9 -' . - -,E7_22222--2-~-1-12 - *.- .f -).I-Ii I - ----7-24-v-----Â·~244,10.----1--Of .. 1 209-S Ventnor Ave ! 1 ---3 .. -\ .- ..Slk%2 U<- - . - I >532---11=_1 ---Ii---*--4-1 1 , - : Aspen. Colorado 81611 ' - ~ ~1~~~- ' 1 303/925-7149 N *- 2â€¢- , l. CA'Kt=,177 tpaqÂ« 6-7 I.----' . . . << ./1 - - 1 11 , . ~LIA \\bl F. i - - 1- < /. 1 ~_23- -72--5~~ 1- 1. / f 0 142- E. 1*rl<1 Ne wa ' 8. \ 0 0 *2 AeraH , 422 3 16' It - - 2,0.'v/t#% or Â»Â«u r.koi AÂ»09'0 . 15 H ,-r 10 77 = I ! pl H 11-01 19Â» K L f#2,F D F I 1 PROJECT NO 01*10 ~ DRAWN BY VE -PfÂ« 1 : ~ CHECKED BY J . i rlÂ«fwr.1 -~1 i i ISSUE DATE 1 1 2 -417 - ~16 i UL I . li 1, SHEET TITLE i I tt 9*14 -l>eval, _ 4 ir,NUA-HU-'_- I f__I--_I _ 1_ I ~-J~~ - ./ f 1 4 1 i: SHEET NO- i 1-4-11 -- -11- 011. . i +DECLI<4 LEVEL FLAH 1OF SHEETS i it ti . L - i'i-:' 'irt,-.-.'.-'..'--'".-'-...-r- -----W . 1 I yinmg=SM./.im... 1 DYER & ASSOCIATES : ARCHITECTS i - 209-S Ventnor Ave Aspen. Colorado 8161 i 303 925-7149 AwlÂ·41144 6TRUS"rUKE AÂ»VE KAL -- Al:2:1*k 11*-k<REkLE**65 1 - 614~ 6 1~p<' 19* AVE Â»FE H , 22 3 lDp j 1 . li = -4- . =~ - , 7---#---------------------/ 4 PROJECT NG F 1 ---- -- --- -- ~-- - N - 1-I -1 layle 1 1. - -----f- , 'i 1 1 L . I , j DRAWN bY :Â· i I ><4- 1*VWL M:222 1 1 A PY 5 12- E 1 % 1 4.1211-101 - toz:.1 HTÂ» 1 1 CHECKED BY j j i j. d : 1 1 2--1 ! = i i 11 1 , 1 60' >0 *1*2, api-4 (TYK> 1 ISSUE DATE I Vi â‚¬ 11 1 , 1 ii i Â£ - lit -/ -3 1 1 - 1 - lk' SHEET TITLE 1 A-, 11 - 01'â‚¬ *I,EVAT 142 N 1 1 -11 1 1 4 11 11 11 11 - 14-1 7 24-1-1- +1-1-t- -i-1_17 - 4----4 4---4 1---4 . 1---4- i SHEET NO. t EAS-r _E-L.Â·64* 101-1 9 11- 11-011 73'126.1~ J OF SHEETS - - Â·.- 4-)P . DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS il' , 1 209-S Ventnor Ave 1 Aspen, Cotorado 81611 303'925-7149 20Â«ffiff / WCAC 1 1 1 1 4 1=42, 1 ,- \* 4, 8'Gx/SU \4627 P - - Tilâ‚¬-IUVL Irla \\bur -0-- 61911-la- rs.1 1-{TEP -2/ 6 14 6 -1-bfK I As AVE 4*0* RAT RAIL 1 #6794625 14â€¢ 1 1 1 1 11 ' 1 >+ 4/P 62:*14 '. tzy,bepe erfrD 1-1 11 = 0 r Reil,ul M 149 PPOJECT NO i 7/ 199244111:A <PFACLUms Â¢[TrICAI-3 - - 1022110 ' DRAWN BY - ** F.. 9-(En : , CHECKED BY. ISSUE DATE 2-4.-11Â·16 L l SHEET TITLE j 1 Harrl-lf_El,0Â«kprÂ·-1 . SHEET NO _HLMITA-1 ELEÂ»F\Â©H - r 04---2 1 -2 i 1 . : OF SHEETS -@EUER.46Â·Â¢91 03> -, ..<M.e.. Â·08/Â·4 4...:-7 AvHi Ha -6mtky[LIKE -Ale,VER %142. - Adze,k . 1 *'1*TIN,01 /- EDFHALT *HIN410 POA,C, 4- e. - OINC, TO MBZH 6. - j I lilli 11 11 1: 1 -1 ~ 2 61 211-1:91 - rm-1HTEP 1,+ 1*VA- U=:P i b V L Hft' lil Z , Â£'*54Â¥,a- 30\05 etrf) _---2 fl fl li I it 11 1 it 11.11 ~1 11 .-7--1 lilt:i:111,1 11 Il 11 il 11 11.~<ililil el' 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 t-1-1-t 1-4-1-t 1-1-11- 1--4 L---4 \ j kkive. i 001-- -Tz> dg:<La,Â£~12- Out, 44 66 j I... 1 . 1/9 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 834 W. Hallam, Conceptual Development- Public hearing Date: April 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Conceptual development approval to construct a second story addition on top of an existing wing at Poppie's restaurant. The addition is to be used for an employee dwelling unit. An increase in F.A.R. for this purpose has been approved by City Council. This house, the Nellie McClimont house, was built in approximately 1889 and is basically unaltered, except for additions to the east and the rear of the building. Most of the original detailing is intact. This site is a designated Aspen landmark. APPLICANT: Michael Hull, represented by Jake Vickery. LOCATION: 834 W. Hallam, Lots K and L, Block 10, City and Townsite of Aspen. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please see the attached information, provided by the applicant. Development Review Standards 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adj acent parcels when the subj ect site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq. ft., or the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 5-510 (B) (2) . 1, .. Response: According to the 1904 Sanborne map of this parcel (attached), it appears that the one story addition immediately behind the 1 1/2 story house is either original or early enough to be considered significant. (The map also shows that two outbuildings have been demolished and the existing porch appears not to have been original.) The presence of historic windows on the west, and also the form of the mansard roof also suggest that this is an old addition. The proposal involves demolishing the roof of the historic addition, but leaving the rest of it intact. The employee unit creates a second floor at the rear of the building. Staff finds that the proposed addition is compatible in mass, scale and general design with the original structure. The ridge height of the new addition is slightly taller than that of the historic resource, but this should not be evident from the street. The architect has retained a sloped roof form over the one story addition for drainage and to serve as a "railing" for part of the deck. This element also reflects the historic roofline. Staff's only recommendation on the project is that the Commission and architect evaluate whether any more distance can be placed between the south facing gable end and the historic house. The proposal sets them only three feet apart. A number of setback variances are requested, mostly due to existing conditions. A parking variance of two spaces is also requested. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Only one other historic structure, 920 W. Hallam still exists in this neighborhood. Both buildings are well preserved and are very important visual markers as one enters Aspen. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposed addition will not diminish the historic significance of this site. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part , .. Response: According to the 1904 Sanborne map of this parcel (attached), it appears that the one story addition immediately behind the 1 1/2 story house is either original or early enough to be considered significant. (The map also shows that two outbuildings have been demolished and the existing porch appears not to have been original.) The presence of historic windows on the west, and also the form of the mansard roof also suggest that this is an old addition. The proposal involves demolishing the roof of the historic addition, but leaving the rest of it intact. The employee unit creates a second floor at the rear of the building. Staff finds that the -proposed addition is compatible in mass, scale and general design with the original structure. The ridge height of the new addition is slightly taller than that of the historic resource, but this should not be evident from the street. The architect has retained a sloped roof form over the one story addition for drainage and to serve as a "railing" for part of the deck. This element also reflects the historic roofline. Staff's only recommendation on the project is that the Commission and architect evaluate whether any more distance can be placed between the south facing gable end and the historic house. The proposal sets them only three feet apart. A number of setback variances are requested, mostly due to existing conditions. A parking variance of two spaces is also requested. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Only one other historic structure, 920 W. Hallam still exists in this neighborhood. Both buildings are well preserved and are very important visual markers as one enters Aspen. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposed addition will not diminish the historic significance of this site. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The architect has established a fairly simple material palette for the addition. This is appropriate as the historic structure has a number of prominent decorative elements, such as projecting bay windows and unusual dormers. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Conceptual approval as proposed, finding that the Development Review Standards have been met. 2) Conceptual approval with conditions, to be met at Final. 3) Table action and continue the public hearing to a date certain, allowing the applicant time to revise the proposal to meet the Development Review Standards. 4) Deny Conceptual Development approval, finding that the Development Review Standards have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Conceptual approval be granted with the condition that study be given to the distance between the historic house and south gable of the addition. Additional Comments: t *D.H. .. 0 D - - =WvFRAN=C E S= = = ===== 75' 12] - - 733 . S' 1. 71 43:y D â‚¬ 93 49 . - Ul 1, 1 E ' A. 8. C. D. E. .. H. A. 8. 10 * i liLI ELI lit MI L / r 44 [OLD). * L. . M. 0. Q. R. S. ,-1. / *7\ - - --*- 1 1 I.1 /% fiD k '~442 Ln 12 X i 834 1.0 822 816 - 800, S OC? 97 0, 53+ LUe 1-Wl\ a# - W.HALLAM m I '101- 817 805 827/ X ix' D A- D ' DX r- T/-31 \/ 0 8. -2 2 6 6. 7-9 - J><E E-*-- \ 1.1./.>1,7Â· S 1 1 *1 \ 2*,71 W.-0-.I.-~ 11 ---91*kI-- 1XIX A. L. M. N. ... R ... R. 5. l. . . / 01 9 -3] D Dx Dx / f-EE / REF_ , \ En HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 834.WH Photo Information: ASP-E-18 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Nellie McClimont House Full Street Address: 834 West Hallam Legal Description: Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 + 1-story rear addition Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Simple Rectangle with Rear Extension Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Front (north) 3 mature cottonwoods; side (west) 5 mature cottonwoods; wrought iron fence; drainage ditch Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Simple qabled with east shed; asphalt shinqles Walls: Clapboard with wood scalloped shingles at qable ends Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Center. simple red brick Windows: One-over-one double-hung with 1 type shallow-projecting bay with shed roof with one-over-one double hung window. supported by scroll brackets at front and 3 shallow-proiecting bav with shed roof with one-over-one double hung window. supported bv scroll brackets at west side. hipped attic dormers west and east sides Doors: Front: 2 paneled light/2 panel wood Side: 2/3 light Porches: Front: simple gable, open over entry, turned posts and balusters and simple cut out frieze and brackets General Architectural Description: It basically remains in its original appearance. A two-story structure with a qabled porch entry. Other than the linten-head dormers, no unique or elaborate details embellish this structure. Additions have been made to the east side of the entrv. Simple front facing qable cottage with east side 1 story porch enclosure and rear 1-story gable extension, flat roof rear extension. .. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 834.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Restaurant Architect: Unknown Original Use: Restaurant Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Restaurant Construction Date: 1889 Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor ___ Moderate X Major . Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Additions and Date: Side (east) porch extension, shed enclosure, rear hipped roof extension, rear flat roof extension; dates unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Modifications do not impede character of this building, which along with its site features, presents unified face to street. Associated Contexts and Historical Information: This structure is historically representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated bv the silver mining industry. Tax assessment records show that improvements were made to Lots K&L of Block 10 in 1889 bv Nellie McClimont (also shown as Agnes) who sold the property to John Bolam on 06/10/91. John Bolam's name appears on this structure on the 1896 Willits Engineering Map. He sold the property 08/05/11 to Hatte Johnson. Auton and Ludwick Skiff owned the property from 05/10/38 until 1972 when this building was converted into THE GOLDEN BARREL restaurant. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Courthouse Records; 1896 Willits Map Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner AUUU-Oclu<li 1 . \4 F C J L., ~ 7 I,ED USE APPIICAECN EURM 1) Pmject Name ~De el 8~ 12 M foo~ UB - ~App 111.. . 2) Project Ioicatirn 8224- \M , 1-IAL,UWL. 113Â«1-11-0 4 -l) Dll to #-5 1< 1 L , 8< 6 dc. / 0 4 044 4 ~7-h,i)-h,96fc (indicate street U]dress, lot & blbcic nimber<.legal desaziption wfiere appropriate) 3) Present Zoning ~Â· ' ~:7 4) Int Size G DO D 5) Applicant's Nanal Address & Phone # Muflmt. N-0//O 1* t*130 -14.61*5 - 83,4 90, - 14&006Â». 9 6 - 3-6 35~ 6) Representativels Name, Address 12 ]?bone # . \ 46 1\1 10162*1 4Â£244- 100 9 9 0.1 8 4 935/ 4460 7) Type of Aprl ication (please check all that apply)= 9 ~ ~mptual Historic Dev. Conditional Use -6 - Ocooept:ual SPA - Special Review - Final SPA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conoepbal POD - Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final POD I{istoric Demolition RJurrtain View Plane _- Subdjvision _-~_ Historic Designaticn Cor,hniniumization Textv'Map Amendment . GMOS Allotment Ick Split/Iat line. - (IMOS Ehoazption - 77 Adjustmerrt 8) Description of Existing Uses (nunber and type of existing- structures; approximate sq. ft.; rimber of bedroons;.any previous approvals granted to the property)..- h dia /07\ efum I N f 30 25- PAB S F (26>PJ CA,ATM 9) Description of Developmerrt Application 000 971, + 9 M Â¥ urvIEDâ‚¬ 11 N rET j 10) Hav,e you attached the following? P' Response to Attacbment. 2, Minimum Submission Contents / Response to Attachment 3, Specific S.lbnission Corrterts â‚¬ Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application .. SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets o f clear. fullY- lab.eled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. 1 A-4 APPLICANT: 1 ill CHAE>9 441 ):,1, -1 15AA , 3Â· - \ 1 f. 1134. 4 1. 334.- (A). H-8- 6(-Afk. CrrA J)}i,(07 0Af-'0 ADDRESS: ZONE DISTRICT: r-6 LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 3-) i Â§)03 =re EXISTING FAR: 4 ;.ONE) ALLOWABLE FAR: 54 7/40 PROPOSED FAR: 9/3 1.. r EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commerdal): 6 X 191- ' 4 , M 4,1 - 66Â·'t ?29 0,1,11 1 11 /4 (j *E- PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): I 1 1 6,4-A--1 1 /'KE, EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: #FFiC Al,LÂ«Â· PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: M 4 yÂ·(414/ ! 51 423 EXISTING %OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): , >jA- PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (commer.): 14 0 /44#kh) 4 6 EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Blda.: -9 0 '~151 ~ / Accessory Bldg: 1 ~ PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindpal Blda.: 90 / Accessory Bldg: - 0 A , PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: I 0 54 fANd, 141 (31-0 146 EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: -0- {-1 - PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ,9.- ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: /61- *. SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 46 Front: 40 Front: Rear: A Rear. 10 Reac - Side: 19/ G Side: 10/4 Side: Combined Front/Rear: 4,1 Combined Frt/Rr: 3 8 Combined Front/Rear EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ 99Â» 1 Atle *T &60(6 ENCROACHMENTS: p (Â»1 4- C'*Aft VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Only: character comDatibilitv finding must be made by HPC): 1 -7 / 3, FAR: fo 4 . Minimum Distance Between Buildings: A)L SETBACKS: Front: 144: Parking Spaces: Rear: O Open Space (Commerdal): MC- Side: K) 6 . Height (Cottage Infill Only): 61 072 Combined Frt./Rr: - 23 / Z â‚¬5 Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): (vang 3 043 .. 834 West Hallam - Poppies Bistro Cafe APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT - SUPPLEMENT (attachment #, Item #) (2-1) see attached Owner's Authorization Letter (2-2) see attached Legal Description (2-3) see attached Disclosure of Ownership (2-4) see attached Vicinity Map (2-5) Compliance with relevant Review Standards: This proposal would add an Employee Unit above the rear portion of the exisitng flat roof.addition. The new unit would clean up what is already there and be derivative but subordinate in style, design, and treatment. It would allow on site housing for an employee family in such a way as to not disturb the existing historical resource. The existing original structure would remain totally in tact. The new unit is to the rear and side of the existing historic resource. There would be only minor demolition of some roof structure of the addition to make way for the new unit. (4A) The roof forms and general massing are similar to the historical resource in shape and proportion but smaller in scale. Detailing will be related but thinner and lighter and will be clearly distinguishable from the old. It is compatible in character to the historic resource. The requested parking variation of 2 cars would keep cars from obscuring the foreground of the historical resource. The alley currently dear ends and provides 4 spaces. j 71 k 1 .-" .. (4B) The neighborhood is multifamily of recent vintage (contemporary vernacular) to the South and West. The Forest Service SPA has several non- historic one story structures immediately East. Except for the two story dorm, the rest of the block is wooded and undeveloped. Poppies acts as a neighborhood anchor and identity marker. The placement of the new square footage in a "secondary" massing is consistent witli HPC directives. It emulates and is compatible with multiple structures occupying other similar historical parcels. (4C) The proposed addition is to the rear and side of the existing resource. In addition, its placement preserves and utilizes the existing side yard and side yard, trees, and irrigation ditch. Preservation of the structure in tact is far preferable to adding on or corrupting the historical resource by adding to and modifying its upper level. In this manner, the cultural value is maintained. (4D) The architectural integrity of the existing structure is kept in tact with the addition clearly separated and it's own architectural element. No demolition of the resource is required and only minor demolition of the roof of the non-historic addition is required. (3A-1) see attached survey and site plan (3A-2) Materials will be similar to existing but lighter and smaller proportion. (3A-3) see statements above - paragraphs 5 A thru D (3A-4) This project falls into Category C: erection of a structure greater then 250 gsf. POPCR02.WPS Page - 2 .. September 13, 1993 Amy Amidon Historical Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT Dear Amy: The purpose of this letter is to designate Jake Vickery, Architect, (tele 925-3660), as my representative to act on my behalf concerning Landmark Designation and the addition of an employee unit to my property at 834 West Hallam. .. 1 Sincerely, Michael Hull, owner E AcÂ· 9 -r 834 West Hallam Aspen, Colorado 81611 jo 38 4.2 1/,1 6 0 1216 . ?L i C 4. L El Â¢ P.117~ Cd, 9- j ...> ,/. / r. 1.1 1. *41 644 1 1230 11#1 , ~44,4 4.1 61:3 90\ e -9 0-2 *ive )(UN, O 1 1. O Â·fo. 00' . --0 - , 0 0, M. o b 4 j.4 1 - s & ck *VafnE , 3>, bullct 44Â£Â¢ rt 4 P 3-Li e 0 Scal 4.1 '926 37 y o 7.0, :11 d 00 ' 0 0 Fr I 8,7, I Ae FI#< i ./.cli'IN; 6.;4 . T<Lck k | 1~ g /49, 0 L Ot o i 810 Ftp 2 . . .44 00. 1 13 4 lA 1 - O 1 4 li , N .1Â£4 19 60.2- . *.U' -- , -Stte-et NOTES e - indicates found rebar and cap 0 - indicates set rebar and cap marked L.S. 14111 The real property described hereon does not lie within the limits of a 100 Year Flood Hazard Bcundary. Legal Description: Lots K and L, Block 10, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. f I hereby certify that on August 16, 1993 a survey was performed by me on the parcel of land described hereon. A two-story frame house was found to be on 2,/ said parcel as shown on this plat. All easements, encroachments and rights-of-way R in evidence or known to me are shown. This survey is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bel~f. A 44 -42- By: sydn,55 Li~{come P.L.S, 14111 . I -EGvlp*Love'Yvle'VLL SUMVâ‚¬U e I ." '. -0 7-1 9 0, 836 W -3-Co- I apot Seeek) I . As@e,A , Cotorrid o BY: ONES IN SPACE . SYDNEY UNCICOME ( L.S. 14111) BOX 121 CARBONDALE, COLO. 303-963-3852 17 Aug. 4 993 SCALE:f= 20' 0 . 1 t -0 - - -- , 0 - 0 0 -4 1 \A . 1 ' I 1 f - ~lilli - 1 1 .-- 2- - - -1(01'1 1 40.0 . , /'A . r i 1 .1 1 4 I . : ls:23 2//7 #ATELT/ZE:Er-t<\~ 1 2 I / / 841.- 41%312#1- ././1 6%1*rIHA 9Â·'ruM \Â·\41 reTU-ge,1. ... . \ \ \ I / / M ////1 .% ./ 1 .. - \\ 1 4 1 r h .-iJ . . 1 ! 2-_74!112 4 gl,or ,' L , 5,1- j/_ 1 1 - 1 1 { . 1 - el.11Le 11*1 Â«}94 #4 4 - I Ill Ill-- - 1 i Â« M e I 0 - . %% -Z' - --Il - -5 , 0 --- 1 1~1Â«1â€¢14-- pl*4tr~--i --29=ZEZE~b % 9 64\ Â«I - JAKE VICKERY EX. SITE PLAN 15- 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03 POST OFFICE BOX 12360 , ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 al 6 7 19 3 A K E TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE (303) 925-3660 rÂ«1 % 61/1 rlare# Apc>r[IoH 12 13_yaL> W v TJYH, Â°IM 9./0...I. $.I-F .1~ -'P. . f r i lili U -f-- It 1 _Â·Â·.UX. \.' ... ..1 0/ I - 1 -. . . Â· i 1 0 1 . 1. . .9 EX BASEMENT PLAN 01 8 7 %5 k -Frrig FRI Al:>r 56 +PPITION rill JAKE VICKERY 1 R. 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03 ' POST OFFICE BOX 12360 ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 AKE TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE (303) 925-3660 . . I. L , .. I, 1 ,---1 . 1 , 44- . ~Â·..0 Ybr-2 , .. .. . ' i 1 -157111'HA / Dll . ------1 - f?f=====N ~491.Awu V.F-.:~I.::-.v v'Ae,-Mr'r"e< H t' 11 - i 1 - I I... I ./. -- -r 14 - I -f 4 - : 4 T=L - .. .1 - I.-- --Ii -ill . 1 J 11 -1 f %41 .. - 1 \ . 1 4---41 â€¢ \ 1 1 -IL . ......2.1- It -:-- 0 - - - 1% . . i - muy- . i - - *rrcHEH - t:PINIH4 19:Z:'M 1 . i. i r -- - 1 - * . -~ 1*UL. .48yk 1 14 12-1 4.4. 4 -1 4. I 40: a- - , EX, LOWER PLAN , 61 3 15 -@TflÂ»- - - EM Â«NK -- _APPITPH - AKE VICKERY 1 2. 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03 POST OFFICE BOX 12360 ASPEN. COLORADO 816I2 a JAKE TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE 1| 17.13 ----~~ ~~- (303) 925-3660 9./ 0 ..r ... 77 V: I. 0- 1 1 % 1 :r . I .4 1 . '.1.7 - A . -. t,Â©773fri- . \ I. X _L * . P, /76 1 1 r el~1'P& OFF'Ge !3 41 i I - EX UPPER PLAN ~ - d / 3 19 @PFF:21 2@ , 013 AÂ«5 Â»2111*H rlill JAKE VICKERY / 1 . 1- . 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03 POST OFFICE BOX 12360 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 3 AKE TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE 4-1-17|15- - (303) 925-3660 f I . . I . f. / 1 q . . 22 . / . 1 1 TAgn L-Im 11~' r Al' 11 . 6-1 IL_1 --.i . -- 1 1 . .;. I % EX. SOUTH ELEVAT ION fÂ»?11'. ''.d~. 1 I I '1 1; 1 1 1. -1 . 4-0---- . 2 Â· 1- 1 ... i / 0 - . 14 JAKE VICKERY 1 2~ 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03 ~ POST OFFICE BOX 12360 ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 -EX WEST ELEVATION IAKI TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE f k.' - (303) 925-3660 -1 c -1-1 17- 1%----3 --p--i----- _ - - 1:35> 155Â¥571;:EZ- --121*1~31 -e-rc:rC- -ivirn 01-A.6.1 E .i"'11.. )90'Imp~ ':'91. -7 - 1 . 4 " .44 Â· . .y - - _Y .... \ . 1 . . 1 -1 -2 2 1 EX. NORTH ELEVATION -' elib"-~IlI -=.I---4 l5 |L L.- - 0I 4 t . -I -1 11 - . 1 1% -- . 4 4 1112 3 J -6 , 4 - 11 -TiT. 1 . Â» ti=-2 ----- . . r~ JAKE VICKERY 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03 EX. EAST EL EVAT ION POST OFFICE BOX 12360 ' ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 AKE Airil#=*-da==9 - TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE (303) 925-3660 -11 17-Iist-- rep-~ A~,73@Â»~ FE.eprÂ«Â»62Â¢7_1-rlo H ~- 4-r.<Il .-Br~- - me . . - V .. . ,. . 1 1 1 & al - .- . 0-- L.-li y I -il.-.Il -0 -I -Ill -. l i NO R TH E LE VATÂ·ION i . - I - I 1 .. ... 1 ~1.- Il 1- --0 i - - . :tt i \ 1.,5,26* 1 E]lIli- - EAST ELEVAT iON rill/ JAKE VICKERY 1 - . MOST OFFICE 80X 12360 100 SOUTH SPRING ST â€¢3 ASPEN. COLORADO 31612 4 Kâ€¢ 1 ( 3 03) 9Z3-3660 TELIPMONE / FACSIMILE 17140--f..1 Z 56~ -:. ... '1' . 4 . ~(7~~ ..mi ... I - I I. . . I. I . 1 . .- .. . -Il 0 -1-2 0 :- Ell ./ i -- - 'IM SOUTH ELEVATION 3 . 1 . \ 6 .4 -i 1 ./ i !11|!iNN /. i:i p.1.'-3 I i 11 \ I I lili'Â»- - 0 : 1 11Â·. 1 11 41 A. - I, li i rn . ill! ill ./ | / i _ili : Â· - it+1! 1 1 1 7 -1111: 1 1 - IR'111 11' 'm'11' 11<1 - /lill ill ill 11 - - iI . .*Il-----1- ---3 3 v-Â· 1 1 LOE . - e==L ; WEST EL EVAT I ON ~ ~ JAKE VICKERY 1ZA/- 100 SOUTH SPRING 57. â€¢33 POST OFFICE BOX :2360 A ./ I ASFEN. COLORADO 21â€¢12 I| 1 7 |14 - 925Â·3660 TELE/MONE / PACS:WILE 0 <KA) MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 316 E. Hopkins Avenue, Howling Wolf- Conceptual, Public Hearing (continued from April 26, 1995) and Final Date: May 10, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to add a carport with a seating area/deck above. The deck will include a bar and stage area. Additional storage and one bathroom, which is required by code due to increased occupancy, will be provided at the ground level, where two parking spaced currently exist. APPLICANT: Two Schmucks Inc., represented by Paul Levine and Steve Levitt. LOCATION: 316 E. Hopkins, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. REVIEW PROCESS: All four development review standards must be met in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: In general, Staff supports the concept of adding an outdoor seating area in the proposed manner. Only a limited amount of space is available in front of the building and seating at the rear of the building must be elevated in order to accommodate parking and storage needs. Building code requires the addition of another bathroom due to the increase in occupancy, and the size of the deck requires two staircases be provided. The applicants wish to have a bar/service area on the deck, and had previously proposed a canopy in order to protect this , area from weather. The canopy has been eliminatedj, therefore the deck will essentially be invisible from Hopkins Avenue. One informal worksession has been held with the applicants since the April 26 meeting. At that time, .. members of the Commission suggested that the applicants "lighten" the design somewhat and try to find creative ways to relate to the existing structure. The design has been amended to show the deck surrounded with siding, broken up with areas of steel pipe railing. Steel "cords" with turnbuckles will be strung between the rails to meet Building Code requirements. The rail is angled slightly, which helps the structure to appear less block- like. In addition, the applicant's propose to hang lights and plants around the deck. The historic house is clapboard, with asphalt siding on the east. The new addition at the rear is board and batten. HPC should discuss if whether there is any reason to try to relate the deck with the new board and batten construction, at least at the ground level. Six parking spaces currently exist on the site. The proposal eliminates two of those spaces to make room for storage, the bathroom and the staircase. HPC must waive two parking spaces for the site in order for this plan to work. The code requires 2 spaces for every 1,000 sq.ft. of net leasable area. Since the other four spaces on the site are apparently unavailable to the Howling Wolf due to an agreement with their landlord, this would leave the restaurant with no dedicated parking area. Staff has concerns with this, but does not have an alternative solution, other than to reduce the size of the deck, move the bathroom back on top and provide for at least one space. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The deck will primarily be used in summer. The alley that it abuts is somewhat unattractive and the deck will be an improvement in terms of adding liveliness to the area. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The applicant has made a good effort to preserve the integrity of the original structure, to limit alterations to it and to physically separate new elements. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. .. Response: The proposal does not impact the architectural character of the resource as viewed from the street. The historic structure will no longer be easily visible from the alley. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual and final approval, along with a waiver of two parking spaces required for the restaurant, with the following conditions: 1) Provide drawings at 1/4"=1'0 scale of all elevations. 2) Provide drawings or written information which identifies all building materials. 3) Consider siding the bathroom and storage with board and batten in order to match other new construction. j ... :931.li~Â£~./. 4%**11& -*fia:g*;, t DYER & ASSOCIATES [ ARCHITECTS 209-S Ventnor Ave Aspen. Coiorado 81611 303 925-7149 , 1 k 2*195'12~/*844 FOS 1 1 111Â¢-Ijavi irk:31\\2'LF i 1.- .6 191 Hol - FAI HTEP Â® 14 5 10|:prk.l 45 AVE Â£#& A#r 1~1 1, 1 4411#4, 45.23 14.1 , .c---- 1 *41 \>/P Â£22FHMFr -1/ * Â¢~et:e 6.TYÂ© 1 CD Â£ -- t - 4~ 1,1 14* PADJEC T No = = i ern-1~1-3 0 91 e FASKI M emuss - --" 7:leal 0 J a DRAWN BY -6 4 /9 - 12, 2Â¥51< ' CHECKED BY ISSUE DATE , --4'llÂ·16 4 fl 1, 1 SHEET TITLE f +101 61,0/â‚¬k:ptÂ·4 ~ t SHEET NO 17'OBTH- ELEVATI OP-1 411 8 11-011 j - .)1 .-. -- -.0., -- --- -14 L- ''L OF SHEETS 8 1-41,11 ./4 no 7 61 --1-rÂ»-r=:Â·*1,8...11.* 0- .... - 21: Ful; :Zâ‚¬: C Avhlit-01 -6-INg'LIKE -Alâ€¢OVE Â¢*12. -. AH*k *ler!1~60~ ~24*Dâ€¢6,/4/ *SX*'- ~ - -- --- poam . ./ M ,Â·14ZH $ $-4 - 1 1 N i j - ---------------- -- - -- --- I D L 111 ~ 1111 b 011111 . 1 ~ , 1 â€¢6â€¢12'HA - FAIHTEP --- ---- 1 1 11 F 6,92â€¢490' DOL6 CMÂ¢) lill i ' :Â· -, i~a! --7-- - _ _ _ _3_-~ ~ 4 11 v 11 Il 11 111 1 11 IP - ..la 11 i. 0 1 d 11 17 -8 - --- 1 6 1! .1 iii:P ju 1 1 rn , 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 74-11 1-4-1.-t i- -1--11- 4----4 4---4 1---4 2-- -4- &222~12Â£[.lei============__======Ah.=EEL kja-E : 00"U- TZ> 942 . ATnACBMENT 1 ~IAND USE APPIX(XII[ON BIN ., ~w Li U,Al t I 1) Project Name ~ ht _ 3 2) Project Ingtion 21 6 e. Ikr L A-~<- A-~ ,~,~ Co %(6 l ( Lot U BIK Â© (inlicate street a~ress, lot & block n=ber, legal descciption Miere appropriate) 3) Present Zoning CC 4) Iot Size 3061'42 - 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Rione # < 7-43 5 66 4,uojc J 1>14 c P o ' igs , Â· 37-7 z 4-':, pe,~ C.0 9- 26 / 2- 6) Representative's Name, Address & Ehone # p~ 1 Le - , -e- 6 r â‚¬J~pl~- Le./k 4 5 4 0-42- adleâ€ž 23 Clout 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Corditional Use C.noeptual SPA 21_ amoeve,al Histocic Dev. Special Review Final SPA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceotual POD Minor Historic Dev. Steam Margin Final POD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisian Historic Designation Oorâ€¢hniniumization Text/Map Amenchant GMOS Allot:ment Iot Split/Int line (2CS Exalption Adjustment Description of EXisting Uses (number and type of eitting 0.-a.U--LL.--,0 approodmt, sq. ft.; Iâ€¢mher of bedroans; any previous approvals granted 150 the property). I 5 Flou.3 US e /' C p c,1< N LJ- / 9) Description of Develorment Arnli cation lue pr~ , 0% C *6 4.11 0- (/eu~< F DOJ< //~i p (,L.5 /6 + 1 7/lt > r~u v/o<c &)*-11 5 e rA CS 0. CA 00 K r â‚¬ u r 001-1 us.r- 5 4.0 \ Le tx.-, 1 Câ€ž c cu- i,-r,1 ~0116.J 0., r e Q. 12 0 1OU 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents Respanse to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Oorrtents Resporse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 3 1 111111 11, - 1, 41 ,-'T ~1**905 '-~L- lir'"'A -1 M 1 1 7.10 A 1 /1 I .3/ 4,-0 k *'3 'f r- T 7 17 r ; 77- >Fl='A Â¢ 77,"02 . 4960 7 11- r' " 72// -7- 7'7 27 L fa-937,9- j\'rn >rt 5-4 C,-f-,-t,- f J e-0 t"lf r, 0,1 =I 7 '7+ u f -0 N 1- Â»r' r i , ,~.1 **A I *~r~ N t-103 1/4.= 13 1 1 r#,5 ,"V l 1-) *021 0 f00 LE ' t-ry- 1- 1 t T -211+ 1 I 'Â° r.rerv, '"1 1 4 9 1-- 1 81-2.d/8- 71 07 f -re 6 \ }4 1 ~1 4.01+17,.1do \9 j ---4 ft fyÂ«*q n Â°1-- Alko# n L .. !It ii. iii 11 f r~ 1 iii i 21 .41'3 41 ~70 SIA 7 6 -rA ---Jit 7712, 77'Ky*~hÂ· 1 J 9 7 Â¥ & 77 $ r ~t " â€ž1 057 2.7 y r-e <4' -,1 'b 7,F-8 ,/rj,nr,tl; ll 9/0 P , ,-7 -1 rve ,/.4'VO, -r 4/4-4 C rT ---76 9-7 9- 1/1 7 1 b i -1" d, 1 -49 -T 1-9 A l I ' _ 34 --<,3,- --- 4,161 All, 0 910 y 9 7 1 e -v 7 79 1-9 >19' <'01,4 7-1 7 19 C~ 1 v f '11 'Â°li Jil 1 < mel,1 rl"213 i 39 r 1 â„¢,1 ,-0 e't<d----- --c,-9j-1- ~ ft-4~ Â£ 1 + 49 i e / 2 3/ y -rer,ro '7 t 04 -M ..0 hC1 i 1 11 91& .9 2 ..Ckf 4 )11 W 0 1 el 011 749 -3 7 1% 1 v -le"o Tr* -,te d U./ yl 1 --# dÂ©1-gr >U- *Vi 51" .1,1 '5 --- e-li_- -9- Cal'~~)J~-a<Â»J 7, c.0 >01 2 6 1)1~ , r~" 9 tt .1 ...1,27 ri,l .>'r,+ .,4*__ __~_-'_3,5141 - -i-- 3 g j~ vac~'r~T -\j#9~1 , lo f -0.+ 6"f-"f~~---- Â°31- - <fvl Â°5- - )LLL- Oltp ti.(Â· i.) J ' 11 9 13~ '-61-v,J4+------- , , 7 1v *Icirf-/ 3 71 9 -lv flerl Juli-tl ....11- -99* -- .Etc-- 8->F"17,5 Â°t,L /2--fF Â¥Â»Th ffV .. Iii i/, 3/419&ne'm'MT,J.rs"HE'Im '1 .. ..MilwifiA'kib - Â·456Â·:.'Â·'Â·, - Â·â€¢1'43*rÂ· 2.*do:.** . I .. *4<-il, ~.1-#fai~ EA#26â€¢ aetriem - , W Wi i./. 1,~ --- 4,2454.*419$&- ~ 4 =UNTâ€¢1< 1Â»r - =_r r 3 DYER & ASSOCIATES \ 0 O - =74 - ARCHITECTS 12/.... - /1>11 --K - _ ty --ir_-2- - t--- . 't'-TY-14-Itt--1-2-1-4-* ~ - . - Â·- -f..rk. . , / / 209-S Ventnor AvE / Aspen Coioraoo 81611 l . 1 ' 303 925-7149 --vj 41PPE.ag , 1 i \ ~ 1 - CAKe:ry,PasÂ« = NPA - 1 - . -- 2 22-3- f >IfuL-/121*F 18*1-Evll Ha \*l r 1,2*4- , 0 142 5- 1-Or'<1 He> AVE 1 O -1: ..1....1-& 4 1::1 +Grema,t , Clit:/ LEE> lEg, 1 1 L > 1HE Â£Pr tÂ©-rÂ·11 Hal 1 - ABOV/ - -- -7 I h 1 - 91 H 11*31 %44 , W - - 1 PROJECT Ne' ' ?45 'Agwl L - 1 Â· f ~ DRAWN 13\ / 0\*\5 8 ofÂ« i i i CHECKED BY I & " AA14015; 4 rt.Â«Folt-1 i' ISSUE DATE 1 1 " 't 1 4 -ll- 216 . 1 i ~ SHEET TITLE : PEÂ« LavE 6- 12 - 4 4 r\Â»a 1,9 1~ L/11 I . SHEET Ne -" A I. Z - 11 DECK LEVEL FLAI-1 Wth - 11- 5,11 44 - e -- - i 06 SHEETS I + b 3 - -- C>10f; - ./ 4 ---Â·'.1, TÂ«Â·42,â€¢L'*'i . M, 4 MÂ· 1 .-4 17/24 Â· ; 34GUAAâ‚¬Â·Â¢4 34 0 0 0- ~ DYER & ASSOCIATES 4 ARCHITECTS ~ 1 209-S Ventnor Ave Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 303 925-7149 1 AÂ»/H-1 1-14 "6TKL,k~LIKE .1Â« AM=>VE Â»121 -** TRE Â»vul Ha *Lf AMWA . 315 6 1-of<INS AVE " i PÂ«SH 1 (27 2,16:,1 1 -- = 1 y -9 I 1 PROJECT NO " N 1 1%21 0 I -/1 1 1 DRAWN BY: : a 1,4- 1*VWL %22217 ; L -- - 1 K. PY KIA 1 Ii Il i C f-7 1 4121 H a - Â» .1 HT E P 1 1 CHECKED BY 8 lilli . A 1 6â€¢,0 49& diple (Trrt) 1 1/; ' 1 1 i ISSUE DATE. 1 -1- 3 z - 19 -16 4- --- --- 3 f - ti. r=ETTITLE~ ~ 0"fE ~efv,<T1,2 hi 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 t.4-17 -1---4- 1--1 *1-1-1 i-_L_.7 4----4 4---4 1---4 - .1----4- SHEET NO. E AST -2-5 -LEÂ·Â»ATIOH 4 11 + 1'- 011 EELE - OF SHEETS 0 - 0 0 DYER & ASSOCIATES j ARCHITECTS 209-S Ver,trior Aw . -vt , :. -O!0; cloo; 8101 303 925-7146 l' =:AN=>FT-/ta:Â« -â€¢rf f /-/0 1 1 He Howl- 11+31 \\271'f~ - 1 0 49 $8+/54' \=92 2/ 61 $211-11 - 196..1 r-1Tee Â® 4 6 101Â£0'41145 AVE S,Â£65Â· =Ar BA! L,. -3 *44%W4, c:22,2,16:' i ~ , il 1 ><+ 4/P 62*1986 4 Â¢242Â» 671Â© 11 il 4--Y*.-- *.- *91. U 1,1 H e pr.:f.'JECU N< Â· i 047! .1 11 i i 1 i L ) M .8 V~ i Â·; b 1 + i 12.2-(Er i CHECKED Bi + ISSUE DANE f ' 4Â·la.16 t Li ,7 2- - T, *- : 440â‚¬;-1 660Â«k:P N ; SHE F T NOÂ· 1710 FCT A E LE Vâ‚¬- 1 0 H 74 1 1 3 i_ OIl 1 042.2 02 SHEET 1 V -/+ tto 7 61 Cfj ... 4.4-4114*~~ DYER & ASSOCIATES . ARCHITECTS 209-S Ventnor Ave Aspen, Coiorace 8161 < LA 662311-IA , 303/925Â·7149 i. I faWK ' r t 71* kwl-I rka Ustr 9252 112Â« 1,41 514 E- 1.kKI Nâ‚¬ AVE 1 1 1 Â»reN,aa 616,~ ~ i ar 1- 1 1 1 1':279. It 1 ----- - ---- -- 1 , 1 1 I - exlf I Â«torf } 11. 1 -1 i _, t44 ' - WP FFAMIE 120MZ44#+;7 'P I H I HOT :ziNEW:r'.i' 1 1 1 Â¥ 6*1~z:127 'pet-Av i I r -4 i PROJECT NO 1 - 901/5 NAHS 442 A=C-15Â·96 - ~ DRAWN BN ~ CHECKED BY pi_,011 1 ( ISSUE DATE 4 Â·19,_13 peive -up Â¥ T#41*14 ; SHEET TITLE 14 421Â«Veeri- 0Â»H PA 1 41-r:f -fl~* e 1 SHEET NO - 3'TE FLAH y&" - 11- all ep- ! 2 OF SHEETS --4.~ . I .â€¢4,#...Â·.*4.'I I., '~ ':414.:y. rn...... I â€¢Â·>Â·â‚¬00 12*Â·~ - --- a . -7 2/(///////////// %; â€¢ Â·â€¢.Â·â‚¬ '1*rep **P?*9~' $41*44 HB,v --- f ARCHITECTS . DYER & ASSOCIATES '7 - 0 0 t i 209-S Ventnor Ave , Aspen Colorado 81611 1 1 / - 303 925-7149 1 -. --/- E'~Eft P* 4 6 I - //- . N 022:;t- ta}t _PLIHIETE, -PMÂ«KINat<*Â®8*1 - - 6*81*F, Pâ‚¬~. \ V FOR 1- I . 1 - 1 TH& hvbl tâ‚¬31 \VAg . . 1.-- / 3 5162 E He'<1149 AVE / -Â· - '00Â¢4*1+ - 1 ./ . - VUUM*1H<:4 # A ASÂ·peri, 62:, a I cpI I / \VAL,1, . ~ f -'.'. + 1-/ ,. - im/BKIAA-,69(/42 C 4-9 ) 19Â«1*401,46*6 ' h --4, i // i JK HEÂ»'PerÂ»/ELL. 1 1 ./ -It Â»TyÂ¢ HAPI AM,8 4 I - - ./ 42:7VG5 0>4981491 ./ MetÂ»4 1-1 :~ -. t 4 9 t@57 10 ~ i p PROJECT NO *' -E \ DRAWN BY -- CHECKEDBY S Pfal< 9 r,1421<114Â«*pata 1 - L. Â· 1 ~ ISSUE DATE ; - / / 1 N. // \- \ / 1 d...2 ... / k / f U n Et ...... 1. SHEETTITLE ... f . 1 401APUNC> 1-Â®/66 i 1 1 1 1 FLAH 1 4.l~ti r 41,(eli 6 -011-011 1 le!-4211 1 1-,011 12,Lal'~ tÂ·- 17*661 0 1 ,~ SHEET NO f Lp m_*~LI HO LEVEL FLA H 7411 = 1 L 011 ALL__ OC SHEETS *1920Â£314.U-M~U-â„¢=Â·A TIMISID:la;71#ar~LI.C.J<<4.-â€¢ - .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: HOWLING WOLF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 26, 1995, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Paul Levine and Steven Levitt requesting Conceptual Development approval to construct a freestanding deck for restaurant service. The property is located at 316 E. Hopkins Ave.; Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/Donnelley Erdman. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 8, 1995. City of Aspen Account , . . . 0 - *3 45*Â·i Â· DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 1Â·i- Aspen, Colorado 81611 5 4 303/925-7149 il #hrl-DIÂ£Â·Ar 11 Wagr 1 Â¢*Fm:a-4~~ i emeole 1 11----I-inr--1--1 U 'M3918 L -- - *44>~-- ''' 461*-4-4-ue 1 3 I lilli .'9&1Â· ;41.5 1 --- UF 11 111 I 62*45. 4LAB --1-1--- ~~~~ Â« -7 APPITIo H FEÂ¥. l 111 1 1 1 'Mi. %' H~F'611-16 AvE <8 1-lavl, 1 Hal \*LF 11 ! 8412% 11-14 *r I 15 Aer,R#, 90 016.11 .17|ri|AR 01 -1-*04 Lij --7- E- - --~ 231 FAVEL /- ~ ~ 11 HEV 4.- L.A:Â»El Of-1 1.11 1__-----L---_1 1 1 1 0 0 04 1,5271- OIl 700- -UNH / 41 -E =--LAH - 1 REVISIONS: - -- 41 -11 %>% 6-1.--- 6 11 - - ----1 --- -7- --7-- ---------- --- ------ 1-. h, 1 31'1 't'.1,9213780* ~ -, 1 ?47#69-3444 qi-/ . 174 All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and -- copyright of the Architect and shall - -.--- neither be used on any other work nor Ii-Ii -- - --- -- be used by any other person for any -- --- - -- ---- - usewhatsoeverwithoutmmenpermis NIZZ---- - - -- ------- -'---------- - sion. Written dimensions shall take pre- --- cedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any di- - - mensional discrepancy shall be brought r=U==21 Fi- 1 - - - -- - - ---1 -- - 011141=j - 14 pu - -- - ~ to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work. 001 1.-.-- .- . -- .1 w--. -,10*-.=2% ... - ------- 11 4 - 1 , .i ; i PROJECT NO. clt&,I e 7--- DRAWN BY: - 12 Py ER -- . 1 - -- e.e-le CHECKED BY: -- 1 ISSUE DATE: L . SHEETTITLE: 41 Te 4 FIA' F~ rl-Arl E-7 *61- M L. evATIO H @45--E=:LEMÂ«Il-â‚¬=ti~ ___--241=-li-Qu SHEET NO: OF SHEETS . 0 . . . . . 0 . . . , 9.: I DYER & ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTS 209-S Ventnor Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-7149 01-1 - t :.1.2'*7Â£- 1 2> t-/CIMHee:E APPI T ION pel:K TI* 1-1-Avb] Hal (VOLF 94 6 140~111149 AvE 194.96* P I HI 14611301< 44107<9 982 4, LE-VE L FLAr-1 1/411 - 11 + 42011 , REVISIONS: 4*Â·: 9 All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and Specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permis sion. Written dimensions shall take pre- cedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any di mensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work. PROJECT NO. 919016 DRAWN BY: M. PY.12. CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: ~~~ 6 - 6 -16 SHEETTITLE: 212261-BVEL MAH SHEET NO: A-4 2 OF SHEETS ...... 0 . 0 0 0 .I- DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 209-S Ventnor Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-7149 -- M Â¥ 147 *%147 HtÂ·t\1)LAT' --7 R-9,7 109 RÂ« 0 M - AÂ»,41 47=98<21 E 4-9 1 --- Up P .-7 0 - - - . 47=t . --- - ---- 7 Aty'71 TIo H Fox . pefp</2:>492:,MT ' 48 1-kwhi Ne \*LF F*g-K11961 * 1 @\12*11-4 * e 4514 E, #98611-16 AVE .11 1 Aerâ€ž1, g:,e $ IdÂ· 1 | 21'91 Ha - *@AvELÂ· -- 4 " K I ~p>14â‚¬A r~~1~1 Â· 1 L -$ LL- ---- -----K- 4- ------*-- --d-- -*-----I< ---- -----d- -1 U HE\V L.-- 1.64Â»T01,71-4 1 1 *>414-51 kÂ·651 1 1 6220 Le pt 9el<1 HA + 2 *BKI P-21-~ 4- ! I - 1---- - =-L- - -1 r-- O 0 0 01 1 627 1- 63 11 -FL~F-1 461-1 / 4 IT@ PLAt-1 94" = 11-4211 , REVISIONS: M'P fÂ·,1,4WFIAL HoT- Â¢02 - R 4>,4 va,p 70*T (Xff) -4--6/-8 -. I , 1% 4 1 4 )< 10 <N~ 1*41- 4 :1/; ''~513~74~*.46% 146.4 31__1-=AL__ . 1 4 Lvi All designs, ideas, arrangements and " 4,12 (,0NWIR ____ plans indicated by these drawings and '146 1 specifications are the property and 1 ['iMT - - -- copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor Â· 44 - . ----- be used by any other person for any "1 1 1 64 F.eval, i ,ve. 4 1 71 r.011 -+ ----use whatsoever without written permis- sion. Written dimensions shall take pre- L=JI-B--21 -- -4 - ~ . 0 - - . ._ -__ 4- ._. _- _. . -Â·---------- cedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any di- E-=In 1 Â¥4- \417 mensional discrepancy shall be brought Â£ _ __ 47<43* to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work. 1- __-_27-- f-222_ i i ~j . -r- 'Â« CTYID i 00 ~*4Â·TI.11260 PROJECT NO. N - Lj 904,1 e ..06]â‚¬E Â£902513E42' 47[1501, 62:'L,G. DRAWN BY: 476. TI.155 -- -_ 1 1 12 DY MA Â· ''1 49*, 00Â» ' CHECKED BY: 1-- 1 /1 -------22----T--7- - *17,61 126 4 ISSUE DATE: -- 1~ 6 - El -1 6 'Er|*El' 41%4125 1 )* m,vt; 1, Perd>H O \412 *Ip'Ha 01 Nac.1,7ih\ 41 TZ -f Fl...p IK rl-AN SHEET TITLE: 43r ~ E,%â‚¬L~BLM:vÂ«Il-0 rÂ·-4 *~ SHEET NO: ~ 5661 0 1 ANN ~ 9434 ER--1- OF SHEETS ...... Im 4. . 0- 4...2-1% 0 . 0 . 0 DYER & ASSOCIATES ' ARCHITECTS if'f'). ~ 209-S Ventnor Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 < 303/925-7149 , ~~~~~~~~LE--111 Â£+42 4 1=0>p '66'gvlcE 1 -31, I 'l lili I- -- -1 L-LIli[1_i t**/6+12/twr APPITION re'FK :*49 91 714* 1-|-Avll He (94â‚¬ 47 914 6 110]91<INÂ·5 Avle +*rerl, 2, Â»16.11 94'3193 2 1 0-1-34 U:W: A- 9*Â«71 - , t<:11 REVISIONS: 9. Ff-1 4 ><4 vD FE:'sT- s'1+ 11, rITE MA' 1- All designs, ideas, arrangements and - 4*106:AFIRAIL plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and -- 4, 10,22MHER *gr neither be used on any other work nor copyright of the Architect and shall - be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permis- --- 1 ><60 ]5*k/Â£ \UP â‚¬121HA sion. Written dimensions shall take pre- - cedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any di- __ mensional discrepancy shall be brought 1%+ 4:WAI~lee. 9*2!16 to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work. dEN Mfi4 wile/ Â«[BEL eTAIR< 12+ILIHO PROJECT NO. 99016 $><4 4*1, 64. DRAWN BY: FÂ· 12>(612, CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: e.e-ne SHEETTITLE: PEk:26 LIBVE'* fUV-1 SHEET NO: A-2 071 ........ -- .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: HOWLING WOLF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 26, 1995, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Paul Levine and Steven Levitt requesting Conceptual Development approval to construct a freestanding deck for restaurant service. The property is located at 316 E. Hopkins Ave.; Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/Donnelley Erdman. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 8, 1995. City of Aspen Account ~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET ~ City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 04/18/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC8-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-29-008 PROJECT NAME: Howling Wolf Conceptual Development Project Address: 316 E. Hopkins APPLICANT: Two Schmucks. Inc.. Paul Levine & Stephen Levitt Applicant Address: Box 3772, Aspen, CO REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Address/Phone: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office 537....... 1%, _O /7/ Other: P QJ FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: *1 -c =R --1- 1 --3/f A -7 4 r 1 4 4 0 .U-- , --0, Ft il {244 /3 J --i j A D U 1 ....A 1 --- -r --I- C.J J. f j 1 j j r-â€¢-4 - azy Shirts Ute Citieroki-<=~A/ 1 1 (30 JiÂ·ock'Mountainluma=imi#53~~ *Q (ill!--P* lillyWood Sales & Management. In~U - ~~17==1 \ WHEELER SQUARE 1 The Houston -I711 Settmfield Ryan 1 43/Mt.0 03 - ~ The Hub of Aspen ~ Baggage 1.& O'Leary ~~p.~*0 ~ REALTORSâ€¢, Inc. Mountainier A -Â·t ~~~tr':A ~ Aspen eill,ards 1â€ž rhâ€¢ Optical Claim A Company li 'Fh-1 6 --_ Sh~p *ap"*ME'FRINDF8Ljkopel -2=91" 4,91 &010 - CIOÂ¢~17* ' lor>mingbirds House 1 i 1 ilititlt Illd _27, Â· Films 48 , 1 Plan. Aspen ' o An G calimy 1 Wir lamillia SE~iliR -t~22Â©\ AspenT+Shin Coâ€¢,pany ~~~-~~f-'~ 6-82 0ftm ckers Gallery m v Su Call Mexican Restaurant /,/ United Colors Timberline e Art â„¢E SNOWFLAKE INN of Benetton .Books, U "l"'I 1111, 8 1.- 1.-- 1 :~ Wagon T posters,~NZ-AlliandeflEPE R. 8 03 0 tl-J V rl/ New York Pizza ~:gp, HYMAN AVE. WHEELFR OP FRA 11(al"F 01 HYMAN AVE MALL ) The Hall Aspend Ellill""Â·,1""Illihill['IColumbineShop,i....wâ€¢Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· A The ., Asp-, Calvas e...ly.GRA -Carol Dopkin- 4EARâ„¢STONE - Col-TONW' Esprn Aspen _ SponStalker Shmooze- Bounty-L----1 Superstore Drug Q 8. Jammin'-1-Call 1 Hunter 1/24:Cl Aspen Kids Ltd. Restaurant Real Estate Inc. HOUSE . Al CONOOMINI 1/16-r-14-J~W ' 11&&%2 <m BIQJudy Pollock Habitat |~ Hard ~, gÂ¥al 050.signs & Galler, Gâ€¢11.y lin=-61 â‚¬05=-1. f ~ Rock 1.161.11 1 Footloose & Fancy Things Cal* Mark Justin / ...er-~-b, | Takah Sush, Nancy Heller Mark Justin - ~ .... rt 0 r n*Â£427 ./*% 4bh Outdoors r?11 1 "- - Alan Hykes at Aspen Salon (upstairs} 1=~A L. .16 The Hold-Up Eloics suzanney Â£ Iff:Â°~ 1- - 8# 20'k (43hri Eg<4 ) The Steak Pit Restaurant 1 g23 1-Al.L-I= 44 Cache Cache Limrted Additions I -' . -9 ' ~h-Â» bi' -ip Ameflcan *:*vl~&~is, 92*SE,EL*/6/*~Ayf' ~~ 0- -rk LENADO HOTEL ~~ Lti~MER;,4 em*Irr7uii,4171 5~,Dill_-1/ . i - Go,dies & The Kids Smuggler Angels Can Fly 1-mnÂ¥ Glass -Land Office. Kunst I cti,~Z~~ASZ~;~ZI~~ ~'ZZLELLEL:] Ltd. Eddie Bauer Outtittern Campo de Fion The Â·Â·A" Bar Renaissance Restaurant 261* A *peâ€¢ Fire The La Milan's Espresso - Department Fo* Photo 1 Hr Lab ATM & Juice Bar *E- 1 : . &wh Norwest Bank _ Ho~~ .C~" .Re~urant & - 101&* AA lA A 0 a --22'7*/ 're ,-- BarXAH *â€ž.â€ž~ Afir-%_1 W.E. Zinant, Just Paper UnE Piepckr P,rk ~ Ami 1.-~ Th' G/~~~8= ~~g E 1'~ 194 51 PAL LOCALS CORNER of Aspen Music - Store --iiinii Stout,en j 1 E-,-a-ail L--~1 Camets ". le.5 Shoe The ~ 6&18100:mi. 1 NE] Pr*-1~g1inm RA 9#KIYCantina Cleaner-Express Trattoria | Legendi The Miners Upper Edge 1-- m fy $ 1, 44* 2 1 49/EE,4911& a ....Th. Shop ~ 311 0 , Il Four 1 a France! ~ Ii= of Aspen -Building L AN*I,Ex~re~ Mal .Â· Â· ; OLLY GIBSON- Gallery Fidelia Caf* & Be,trn Soofts Pub True Valti Potters Booksellers Bakery & Cafe LODGE Hardware F ,hy, 0 and Bistro F /00'9 11' 1/*'I im E. MAIN ST. m~,v, rn,ir,hi,i,%/ THE HOTEL JEROMEE The THE SARDY HOUSE Gracy s Fle,sher THE HOTEL Asia C Bar & Restaurants Hotel & Restaurant Designs West Gossamer-J Carl's Pharmacy . Company, ASPEN Rest., - ,)11-~-41 wing 6121_-ZZIL) f-. .,r,~ 1---7 01'//Ealitil P-=-Horny Toad' P."Ce Dep{. e 'Bot., ~ F kidiÂ°,n.Horne -)4/Unfl/E/ 0 Â· 1 rb.#a- 5Â£ 62 --/.-Il g ,~3*dlyâ€¢ 1 1 â€ž_ UN? haÂ¢@32 C. 4, 16.-I--45+/8.Efigit~'Â·. '-/# â‚¬V, / ~~ ---~ - -- | JEROME PROFESSIONAL BLDG. BLEEKER SIr Aspen â‚¬,imm.nUy Church .C Cap's Auto Supply ' A Â· â€žikill 6/,Â·i~. e 'ixilâ€¢ir Â»le,iter Napa .~re-- - . 1.r MEAF. r )44 1 - Arking - NORTH M;LL STAnON ~" $0!,lit y- V'I -4 Red arie k Arts & Rerrentdon (le,/e/ HALLAM ST A Clark I Market Take 2 VId ~- Hollander Studio..... -.I - Aspen Wine & Spirit Co. Mall Boxe~tC~b>~~~#MiWb72 )z:zzÂ·c=-<----'--ml 11'7;15,'1,,Log-,AL R/ Gran,ie Park *49# 1 *jijw/&Alp ANA 4 , 1,0. 11, Â£,Ul 1 -1 -- "{1391'letfU , --- 1 "4~Kif ,5 <AF M Alpire 5.:~~t~~~~kEU -~Jr--=~ P=*28 3 & Gle,1 hilm//0 j - Canyon Cleaners Express i ' /. 7/pair' m ,/ie Parâ€¢ --1 PUPPY Â¢f 63*1-. B f.4/TA#lihdulf} - 40NW#W,3 11' 7 2 45 ...i. ./ Rk Vic -ad - Henry's Audio/Video Specialists Ltd. -9 E. U. 4 7#A % Sunshine Cleaners AID 74.11 Aspen Velo Bicycles & Landromat Video Rie--- ~ dp ~ \01 K 1 44 44A AA - & Snowboards p- 1 ---0-9 Grande \~ Ak \ amler. 7 81&1 19 1J *3902 4 A -" 941 ST-J~~~--~ ./ Use It Again ( n backi Upen Center for 7.Â¥ J ~ Inwroomer,Mi sn,dies g~; 4; tp ' - - - - !:6'941#~~019 1 Aspen Ar, Muslum La _ZIG~/ Hanam Lake A 11, Nature Pre~erve A rr"-'% . .iwilwlÂ»AL 'Ir Hallam i.akc ... ----1.-_ 1 . 1 Hunter ' 1 Creek 06 ' A 0 - 1 EL-J 19 HOSI lS HO fly â‚¬17 7/ 7-Ae 7- tÂ°~ ---i~ n t' 9111Â° 1,2>"la --21-1 V. â‚¬41 r V,Â£10,3 >-11/ igÂ©\De J tâ‚¬ Â¥lp 9 f' 1 ' 4 ' fl- slÂ¥ - -ri- .01 rv (/ trr, f.Â»64 20- - E ' .14 325 1 0- fÂ»139 .. ./.- .....'/'I'- - ---1- ... 51-411 311-all 2 9 2 ex'.51-1149 [>A Hew DYER & ASSOCIATES +4+ ARCHITECTS -- hy'' U .... +-4 111 m .!1 209-S Ventnor Ave. 4 Aspen, Colorado 81611 *44 64 - / 8Â£,Wif 303/925-7149 -7134.. , R 1 - -- - - -:.1 ards,7 2- 6.Fl PUMps'[Efâ‚¬ 4461/265>A fhÂ«114631 9>p<36 *1 1--4 Of.-- Fz:~12- ..__11!-1 ,-1 \.i.4'. 11.L - u'K- f .4 1---r 1 1 . I . fl- r- 11* 140:vultta \*LE 4,1 1 ,># , \ N ./ 6 14, E 1-15Â¥'1< 11~1.5 AVE Aegti 62> 2>164 1 .ltu M *1 1-101 -\ / , [ \VAL-1/ - f Â»h I , \ \ 1942#H,31 9Ce *20 1944411431 â‚¬11<56 *2> i \ 1 / . 1 2 ... 4- %>Agi202 I -Il I ... --- -/ \ 452:24,6 fz- exier' M &251Â»413' - PROJECT NO. Beflai H N. 1 Â°ISO I e ' DRAWN SY: F . PY'EM i FNEK.1 Hal azE:56 +40- FAT Al 14 Â£31 â‚¬,p<ZE,143 CHECKED BY: 1 - 1 ISSUE DATE: 1 ../,. . - Â·,24-435 1 - 1 11 0 n -04 SHEET TITLE- 1 1 621FWUMP 1-Â®/61- 1 f'LAH 5 aluts # 41'eli I 3'-â‚¬" ; 1.2 '-O 9 1 1 111 1210 L k 0 - 1 1,13' L O U . --_-- SHEET NO: 1 I.- Al.1 * 97 0 H O La/EL- FLA 1-1 . !411 = 1 L 011 OF SHEETS -.... -=~&;.....'I.~.9- - â€¢17% mA 1....24/ I 4 464 .Â®9~N~-Â·2,Â·.9 Â·dr :.91., *fleti 311-011 /4=.11=.a,Â£92.9,<#~911*1~:na.. 4/ 'L 411 86 492" Au '~ 2 2 DYER & ASSOCIA[ S * 4 ....... r ARCHITECTS - * . ' J 40 - ~ i- r :' 4 -- 209IS Ventnor Ave. t .ir- 1 - - Aspen, Colorado 81811 ' 5.:% 1 < .-'.:i~"iÂ»49 - 303/925-7149 -pe- rÂ· r 71;WEV 41. . .... 1 *62. 1, M'-7 i~ li' 5 2 Â»Kft>Â« 995* - FOFL 3 ) E 11 TH* 1Â·Ev L I kel\*LF r 316Â· E 1.1~19<1 1-14 AVE C' AGFEN; GO 2, 1 6, 11 == - ir - -0 1- ! 0 = -21 M 11 - 11531 .26 5 Â· A ! 22 6 + IL- 4 h=== r. - & i / 1 PROJECT NO. 1 i ! . < DRAWN BY: 1691 0 ./\ 0 1 1914:~7 1 = K. 2#A i CHECKED BY: 3 ISSUE DATE: -fiâ‚¬f Alzeve F - - . t I ., SHEET TITLE' - 1. 7 F ,- CWH< UNet MAN A - dd <2-1 L l~ ii ~ A 1 9 Â¢ i 5 21'. O " SHEET NO: < Al.2 C E) Deck< LEVEL PLAI-1 !/411 = IL OIl OF SHEETS 41/ .... 1 ..1?%,Al. DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 209-S Ventnor Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-7149 Â«f:ecrl DEAÂ« 96 .14:xvlit-4 uÂ»: # 615 6 teri< Irle AVE /*rE H 1 <27 2,16Â· 11 --~ PROJECT NO. N 14:Pie DRAWN GY 1 ; IC, 09Â·FA 4 -1 U - CHECKED BY: ': i! 0 ' fi i fi ISSUE DATE: 0 4.-- -p ----- - - 1 11IiI 2 11 1- i- -1 1 1 11 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 ! 1 Il !; I 1 1! t! 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 19 I it Â·Ill I ; i iii ; -1- it- 6-'ti ~ 11 it i 1 1 1 1 H i! 1 1 1 ii i , 1 11 ; 11 :1 1 i. Â·.!.1 16 1 1 11 . ; 1 i 41 /1 1 L--4 'i Â· 4 1 11 .1 i. 1 Â· â€¢1 'I A 'L " 1â€¢ 1, 1Â· I' SHEET TITLE' 4 i i | ~ I | f *6-F *BVATION 11 11 11 11 r-1-1 -1 1--4 - 1--1 + 1-1 -2 1--1.-11 1---4 2---4 1---4 1----4- SHEET NO: E AST- E LEVAT Ie rj hfÂ· 11 = i i- criji A20 1 Mitr . OF SHEETS ~ Â·Â·Â· . Â·i, - . /.h '*- .-I-- -...........6----d61......i .1. . '- -1 nk-~lo .... 2,6411 31'- a" 2 2 8*161- 11-14 1>4 H Bw , i , DYER & ASSOCIATES +1+ ~,4 -Ir-1 ARCHITECTS 111 11> 41. 209-S Ventnor Ave. i )(. Aspen, Colorado 81611 k: / 303/925-7149 115'ALL .4. 1 : -== 4 ;) 156/Fi i r-r.-1- Â£ , PUMPS*fb. **4Â«114* erÂ»6* 1 43KFFF / Pâ‚¬UA / 4 6222:- 6 f.~ - FE:712.. 1 044 - U P =, 1. , 1 4 .r- 1 -['1* 1~VI,1 %1\\#71-F U 0 \ I 7/ '' 1 I /6. , 3 - 5 14, E 1-1~< 1 HS, AVE -- 1 * U,ut.4,i rl<a - ---\ f Aerâ‚¬Â·14, 449 216,11 .. 1. *U, f -1 / 1 , ~ 19k}Â«1HA .BF<38 11;2 (( ) ) 1949<.114:3~ ely.,% 4 \\ 1 1 2 M \ I -- / \ C , H Bivper\vsul. , .- Â« FINm A:718 4 ' ex "ET' LDS, 42>vefc , 11.'i 82221Â»4 132 PROJECT NO. f< g/17,41 -1 ..\ *, 1 OP*,1 0 , DRAWN BY: F + PYISM. 19Â«11-011,00 4 FAÂ©141 Adsl ep<DE#fe CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: \ i. * N -1 I / SHEETTITLEÂ· 9 j 1 1 1 , 1 . FIA H Al..99 41,0' 1 1 12 '-62 " 1 1 6 il , 1 111 -D , 1 â‚¬71* L =2 . i < f SHEET No: Al.1 41400 14 0 LEVEL FLA 1-~ 7411 . 1 L<:211 OF SHEETS ..& .... 59'-oil 01-411 81- 4/2" el<,11 4 . ..1 . ..5 AL;.t..'*, . 1. . f. 5 4 '1144.X-0/ i T T Â»-Â»1 Â« . DYER & ASSOCIATES -- K ARCHITECTS Ed 209-S Ventnor Ave. = -# Aspen, Colorado 81611 . h -- - - 303/925-7149 0<le.711+31 - I - '' n 41*ya~0 9 4 . i17/JÂ« i 1 01~4* I r : 1 < 7Â¢2777-01" 0 1 Â»â‚¬ft>MIT-/ t724Â£4 - 4 1 1. r r-///. + - _ FOA 12-1-*--ti --- , L -ENG ~av L 11-14 \\871,F 3|9 8 AMJK| 144 AVE Â»Fet-1, ao Â»16.,11 - 1 - 0 1 . , rsH --- 211-11 IH(51 Pa544 lip U L 1-Â·-n i f# _ . .~ .1 / - L PROJECT NO. 11&919 1 / - _C t B'* Mt-:4:6<kj MI 2(glt DRAWN BY: - rÂ»Fft:'El-1 3607 CHECKED BY: i N Â»vr' 1 NIZIi j ffi6r - 6'2,E296 1 ISSUE DATE: 41 2, 4. .. SHEETTITLEÂ· O.1 -ff - -- - r paCH< 1*81/ MAN * ... 4 01/1011 111-gil 4 3 91'- O " SHEET NO: t (~ DECK LEVEL PLA'-1 !/411 = IL 011 Al.2 OF SHEETS .... DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 209-S Ventnor Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-7149 6+69â‚¬ l VE,\63 34 14Â£:Av!,11-4 \elf 1 L' 31> 6 125<IMe AVE L A',EN , 645' Â»lap 11 1 -~ ~ PROJECT NO. N lei e 1 f - , DRAWN BY: ~ ' Fr ily *Kfc ! CHECKED BY: 4 4 1 1 1 1 .3 i 1 1 + It; I ' i g I ISSUE DATE: 'i i _ ~~ 1 4 14 11 1 1 11 I ii !1 11, 44 - r - 1Â¥-41 1 11 1 1 1 11 i 11 1 1 0 i 15 1 1, 'I -4 â‚¬ 44 4 1 8 11 i! 8 1 . 11.i Â·1 il i! 1 il i is lip 1 1 '1 .1 'A . SHEET TITLE' 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 } *er kevÂ»er 10 A 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1-1--~-t 2-4-i-1- fl-1.-r 1-1-1-1 4----4 1---4 L ---4- SHEET NO: E AST- E LE-vAT 1 42 H 5* 11 = 11- 011 ,42. 1 OF SHEETS . , â€¢ -Ir nâ€¢ .4 Ir' U- *##I i-- *â€¢ -4~~-&W/6 nt-~6