The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.320 W Hallam St.HPC009-03- Haas Major/Conceptual Hist Dvlpmt 320 W Hallam = 2735-124-002-21 HPC009-03 -----*. i A 3-2.0 ob l-UllÂ» 9 2 64 5â‚¬, 1 \H- 96 009 - 03 ,-r, *6/8 1 Box Â£49-92 1. A 8 1 1 1 JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado c .' HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONCEPTUAL REVIEW ------- - r-- - - -- ---- ---------------- DIRECTORY INDEX March 23rd, 2003 2-JiNE--EL: JUDY HAAS A.0 COVER SHEET / CONTACT REFERENCE / FAR CALCULATIONS po box 33(3 | LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT aspen, colorado 8IeI2 SURVEY Al.0 VIGINITY MAP - 320 NEST HALLAM PROPERTY tel 470.425.6848 tel (studio) q-70 .425. 8840 ~ Al-5 PROPOSED SITE AND TOPOeRAPHIC PLAN fax 4-70.425.8540 A20 EXISTING HISTORIC CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION A2.1 LOWER 4 MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED PLANS A2.2 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS 4 CONTEXT ELEVATION ~ DESIeNERS: ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE, LLC. Ae.1-5.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS derek m. skalko; principal designer judy haas; project designer 320 oak tane aspen, colorado 61611 tel 470.544.0645 Fax 4-70.420.-7822 f . t~-----11 ~ *t 212_U_-6 TURAL 11 11 6-2-NAULT-ANTS: r U eENERAL GO-NTRACTOR: design collaborative,llc. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS skalko . haas L_-___- _~~ _~ --~ - ~ --~ -~ Zoning: RO Lot Area: 3000 661. FT. I FAR I i Lil_[1-1LLLIi_LU-Ul-1214L Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1,500 50. FT -1_[L ' I UULLULIUMU121111]1UU] U _IL-iLLUU 1[_i-ULU-~UllUULLE H Gross Area (53) 111 11 1 11 11'1 11 lilli \1Â©In * Main Level [LILUL!21 " ULN121 ' ! 1 11 1 (Included: pan-abode 1,378 PLÂ»7~211] ' 0- I -,-rT~T'rr,1- 4 main level addition) 1 1 1 -- 1 :-1 1 Iti'ILL_i * LoÂ»tar Level 600 A (8.1 percent of lower level (40.6 countable) - j I countable towards FAIR) U All If 4. r.:1:.; 1 TOTALS 1 1 1 l 1,426.6 - - lilit'11 1 .2 11- 1 1 - 1 - ---- 1~'ll Fl I 1 '11 11 Lili -1 1 , 1.(,1 ~ 1,426.6 < 1,500 - FAR [5 OK 4 4-4- -- - .- Notes: A) The lower level (600 sq ft In plan) consists of a sq. footage of Mall area 20' x 30' X q,_6â€ž In depth. The lopier level also contains a light wen of y x of'-60' x 6'6" In depth, bringing the total Nall surface area of the lower level to 5,815.5 sq feet oÂ¥ surface area. OF thle totat the light well area and 6" of perimeter area around the etructurre NID be exposed, bringing the exposure percentage to 475.5 54. ft., whlch counts for 5.1% exposure to be used agalnet FAR. Sun Mar 23 11: 41: 40 2003 101.5.Ell.m= 111==11.1. --'------=---ill UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT O \Al ER' S CERTI FI CATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ESTATE OF MARGARETE A, UHL BEING THE RECORD OWNER OF LOTS N, 0, AND P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT COLORADO DOES HEREBY SUBDIVIDE AND REPLAT THIS REAL PROPERTY UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF LOT N AND O, AND LOT P UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, EXECUTED THIS __ DAY OF ______, 2002. THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL CITY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, BY: BY, PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO ANTON UHL, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE JULIE GRANT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF COLORADO ) >SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF , 2002 BY ANTON UHL AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A, UHL, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF ____.__._) NOTARY PUBLIC >SS COUNTY OF ________) THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF , 2002 BY JULIE GRANT AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE Â£57*TE-Of MARGARETE A. UHL. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 64 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES] ED GRVL ALLEY NOTARY PUBLIC SET COR X VICINITY MAP -V ~ SET SP' TI TLE CERTI FI CATE SCALE AP SHED N WIRE FL NO 62 (21,07' 10 CK 1 INCH = 10 FEET THE UNDERSIGNED, A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN. INC, PLAT NOTES WIR# 0170 0 .42 1 DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCRUMBRANCES EXCEPT REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PERSONS LISTED AS OWNERS ON THIS PLAT DO HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE WITHIN ' 66 S 655009'11'E 68 F SHED AP PVMT 0 5 10 15 20 THOSE LISTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE, ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE FACTS STATED 1,?Thls Landmark Lot Split Plat has been prepared pursuant to and In accordance with AP SHED ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE, THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT City Council Ordinance Number 36 (Series of 2002), Historic Preservation / 60.Rp'kHO . Commission Resolution Number 32 (Series of 2002), and the Subdivislon Exemption / 3 BOXES NOEL AND AGREED THAT STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC., NEITHER ASSUMES NOR WILL BE CHARGED 70 OF TITLE, NOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD Agreement recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder as Reception ~ 22 SPRUCE NOEL ~p ~ ~~ WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON ANY STATEMENT Number _ , The lands affected by this Plat are subject to the terms and , SET CORI CONTAINED HEREIN. conclltlons-of-s-al@-approvals and by all applicable Land Use Regulations of the City / of Aspen, The terms and conditions of salcl approvals and of this Plat shall run with , n 79 DATEDI _____________, 2002. the lund as covenants burclenIng the same, ~' 22 SP CE NOEL 72 Ap PVMT . TITLE ; FL STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. (30.00') 2,?The 3,000 square foot lot (Lot P) Is entitled to 1,500 square feet of FAR floor area, RED CAP 620 E. HOPKINS AVE, and the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and 0) Is entitled to 3,080 square feet of FAR , ,~ 9018 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 floor area, ~ STATE OF COLORADO) 3,?Owner reserves the right to request a conditional use approval to clevelop an Ap WD FL >ss additional cletached residential dwelling unit on the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N ariel ELEC & COMM. 74 0); It Is recognized that approval of the site plan and design would be required / n COUNTY OF PIKTIN ) l EASEMENT 6, as well, BK 524 PG 828 THE FOREGOING TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS LOT / DAY OF --_-_ _____--______,2002 BY _---_--_-_-_- AS --------- OF STEWART 4.?No further subcllvlslon of the lands depicted hereon shall be permitted nor will N , TITLE OF ASPEN, INC, additional dwellIng units be built, unless applicable approvals are obtained pursuant WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL to the Aspen Land Use Code In effect at the time of application. , MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, 5,?All new development on the cleplctecl properties will conform to the climenslond requirements of the R-6 zone district, with the exception of the varlances approved by / NOTARY PUBLIC the HPC under Resolution No, 32, Series of 2002, Notwithstancling the foregoing, an applicant for new development on the subject lots maintains the rights afforcled under 1 the Land Use Code to request varlances from the dimensional requirements of the , zone district from an entity with the authority to hear and cleclcle upon such requests, 6,?Historic Preservation Commission Resolution Number 32, Series of 2002, effectively '' 4 approved a 500 square foot FAR bonus (already reflected In the FAR limits 4 0% k I established under note '2/ above), a 1' west side yard setback varlance for the 7' 477 0 0 0 3,000 SQ,FT,+/- SURVEYOR' S CERTI l'I CATE Victorian, a 3' west side yard setback varlance and a 4' rear yard setback varlance for 00 4 0 a shed that Is located along the alley, 5' rear yard setback variances for two other 0 sheds that are located along the alley and a 4' east side yard setloo.ck varlance for the ~ 2 LOT N AND 0 00689 ACRES +/- I, DAVID W. McBRIDE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN JUNE 2002 AND JULY 2002, A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED easternmost of these sheds, a 2' west side yarol setback varlance for the Pan Abocle, PROPERTY, THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES, BUILDING ENVELOPES, and a 2' combined side yard setback varlance for the Pan Aboole, 2 6,000 SQ.FT.+/-/ Rf UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 7,70wner and future owners of the Pan Abocle structure located on Lot P, Block 42, City TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER # PCT-17086L, DATED MAY 20, 2002 ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THIS MAP, - and Townslte of Aspen, will not apply for a building permit to demolish said structure THE CONTROL SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1,10,000 WITH AN ACCURACY TO 0.001 at any time, an agreement reached In recognition of (but not specifically In exchange 0,1377 ACRES 2/- f e OF AN ACRE AND THAT THE SURVEY WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRS 1973 TITLE 38, for) HPC's approval of a 500 square foot floor area bonus as part of this lot split, 54 ARTICLE 51 AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, 2 LOT P 4 SPRUCE SIGNED THIS ---- DAY OF _------___, 2002 8,?Pursuant to Section 26.420.020, Benefits, of the Aspen Land Use Coole, accessory , clwelling units (ADUs) or cash In lieu fees shall not be required on/of the subject ,/ properties. TTNWD 1 DAVID W. McBRIDE RLS 16129 51 9, Within thirty (30> days of the recordation of this plat, the applicant shall obtain ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. from the City Engineering Department encroachment licenses for the several encroachments 210 S. GALENA ST. 2 6 ASPEN, CO. 81611 Into the Pub[Ic R.O.W, (two sheds, the fence, and clumpster) 1 SO 20 CTTNWD y 2 1 -- ,- CITY MONUMENT , e CI TY COUNCI L APPROVAL '320' ,/ 3.6 4 Ap 2 1 LOT THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY Q THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ASPEN ON THIS ---- DAY OF , 2002 AS ORDINANCE NO. 36 SERIES OF 2002 AND RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. ---------_.- OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. 375009 4 '11*E 43 AP HSE NOEL SIGNED THIS --- DAY OF _---__-_, 2002, i 49 BASfoff **me Â¢9n AP WD '304' ATTEST, AP BAY HELEN KLANDERUD, MAYOR KATHRYN S. KOCK, CITY CLERK AP ~SE NOEL ~ AP BAY , l 46 AP CONC ~ YEL CAP ' 48 LEGEND & NOTES 9184 41 / AP WALK CI TY ENGI NEER' S APPRUVAL 7 P NE / THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY rpal*84 ; THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS ----- DAY OF _-_------_---_, 2002, l FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR \4 TH CAP AS NOTED WD FC <30.00 3939 CITY ENGINEER, NICK ADEH POL WD 0.32N POL WD F SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL N ED WALK POL 809'11â€¢V AP CABIN 0.33N < (60,00,) 37 POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 kEST HALLAM ST, ' 28 CTTNWD TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYi STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC, 8 PINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL (270,00'> COMMITMENT NO, 00030505 DATED, SEPT. 19, 2002 SET COR. THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN ON Bac - 31 THIS -__-- DAY OF _--------__---, 2002, O SET CORNER NO. 4 REBAR W/RED CAP CAP 16129 WATER VALVE AP FL ,) 32 - SEE SHEET 2 FOR ALL SURVEY FIELD MEASUREMENTS 28 CTTNWD RED CAP DIRECTOR, JULIE ANNE WOODS 36 9018 SE CONC WALK E AP STONE WALL CONC, CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE CURB & GUTTER ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, 30 CTTNWD COLORADO AT --- O'CLOCK __.M. ON THIS ---- DAY OF ---------------, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK _____ AT PAGE ________ AS RECEPTION NUMBER WEST MgG CL WALK BOC *4 -CLAil~ BOC CLERK AND RECORDER, SILVIA DAVIS (74.38' WIDE) BTREE,11 PREPARED BY 1 CO - INDEX ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ' ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION 210 S, GALENA STREET SHEET 1 SITE PLAN, CERTIFICATES & NOTES, VICINITY MAP BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED SHEET 2 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY, EXISTING CONDITIONS PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspenlnfo com m FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWI HEREON, SHEET 1 OF 2 Job no, 32155A JUNE 7, 2002 C REVISED 12-03-02 \ Â®0 Sat Mar 22 14: 15: 36 200 Â¥ I ULL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT H ED GR~ '' GRAVEL ALLEY SCALE SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET CDR AP WD-W 4 0 CAÂ» AP SHED L SET SP' 0 5 10 15 20 100. Na~L TRASH E S75005 VIR# ED â€¢ <8 75009 urgÂ·. 90.jo,....2, PVMT ~ '01'E 90.50 SHED APSED 0 SHED , MCA.9 00 ., 1 . 1 84-n AP BOXES NO43O PAVEMENT 407- M 2 1 2 -SPR CE N , AP SHE I , SHED , E l 2' 22 P~E N 0.00" AP PVMT O.50'' FL i 22 HEAS 9018 RED CAP 10 6 73 lif AP wn Fi , ELEC & COMM, FL ' EASEMENT 6, BK 524 PG 828 /0 , LOT N Â·l l 1 1 1 1 I ..41.... 1 / i , 28.2 PATIO LOT 1 2 W 0 1 23 1 STORY i LEGEND & NOTES - *d j lÂ« 1 / 6 / / O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR W TH CAP AS NOTED l aa, e ! 1,46 6 SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL 0 ! LOT P 4 SPRUG~,6 POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 WEST HALLAM ST. ' Woreâ‚¬44/ i y S 2 STORY e WOOD FRAME. 20' 2~ -44*46V & 2 02 -8- WOOD FENCE 4 36 6,~t~Lf36' - WI RE FENCE HOUSE / 0 * 50 8 te 8% 0 UTI LI TY BOX 20 01Â¥19/ , 4 #& Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 1 â€¢An,Â®4 A & 0\- -- CITY MONUMENT , 08 A I , ~ a~~ ~ SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 42. '320' 4 ' LOT 16 N AP FL Q ~ TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYi PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, lÂ¥ , (S75009 . COMMITMENT NO, PCT-17086L '11'E> 365' 4 124, 1. AP HSE 4 /6, .4 DATED, JUNE 27, 2002 BASIS OF BEARINGS , AP WD , 89*99'MEAS. (90.00') 54' AP B~ ~ APHS ' . , ~4 - ' ~,0 CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED WOOD 6+ AP BAY â€¢ W 6 PANABODE AP CON ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED , Y%84(Ap . 70 2 AP WALK ,/ CALLS IN C ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 7P '304' 2-20' CITY OF ASPEN, PINE ' f I I , 4 ' 20,0, WDF , 1 l pOL W 0.3. POL WD F ED WALK P EL 9.99, MEAS, 59,99, HEAS (60,000 8 Plk i 1 AP CABIN 0,33N Nal--#2 28' . 28 Cr~~*; 244 1 4%*t (90,00') (N 75009 AP FL '11'W) (30.00') BCC : . WATER VALVE SET WATER VALVE 28' 28 C RED CAP 9018 0 SE CONC WALK E STONE WALL AP STONE WALL f IMPROVEMENT SURVEY CONC. CURB 30 Cl~tA~ 30. & GUTTER WEST M~49 CL WALK BOC 44-444 - BOC LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, 1~ CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PI TKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY - ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S. GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT WI THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FI RST DI SCOVERED SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspeninfo.com 21 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWV HEREON. Job no, 32155 NOV: 25, 2002 0 SHEET 2 OF 2 A \ 43.E MEAS, 4050'49'E) N75010' â€¢2'QI Sat Mar 22 14: 19: 30 2003 I UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT , N 64 SCALE OGRVL ALLEY SET Spi 0 5 10 15 20 GRAVEL . SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET CDR AP WD-W AP SHED L ,OOAF N[~ TRASH BLOCK 42 ~* ED , 875005,01 'E 90.50 SHED ; Apl ED 3 Â»71Â·gi. 42@, pg 1 f~P SHED Se-n AP , BOXES NO%O -\\--PAVE-ME-NT LOT N ... i 2--SPR CE N AP SHE l 2, , E 43 22 prICE N l . I. 120 i / '0 , /2 i Cor /0 im i Â·l I I i I ' ' 72- Â° I ./ 1 1 282 - PATIO 12 1 12222 LOT 0 ! 4 LEGEND & NOTES 1.. 4 1 1 e SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL O F0UND SURVEY M0NUMENT REBAR M TH CAP AS N0TED j 2 STORY / 1, '1 : 33 * 1 l:-~ U k l - 1 1 POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 UEST HALLAM ST. ' WOOD FRAME ~ _ 1, 39 -EK \Â£1[ID FENCE - M RE FENCE HOUSE / 9.22 5,051 D UTI LI TY BOX 20 (112WF12 ~ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER i <Mer -- CITY MONUMENT , . ~ SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 3.6 N AP ~ '320' , . LOT Q !4 ... 1 TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY, PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. ' COMMITMENT NO, PCT-17086L <S75009 PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADE ?lt>' ' Â·~k CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED BASIS OF BEARINGS PINE â€¢~ 1 CITY OF ASPEN, 89.99"*42 AP WD AP HSE / Â· DATED JUNE 27, 2002 365' 2+ 1 1 , (90.00'> Ap BM ~; AP HS ' . 6.8, (90.00 AP BAY . ~ l AP CON â€¢ m ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED Â· Â· / itt- il 11! 111 i .. YEL CAP Â· 9184 7â€¢ I AP WALK i CALLS IN C ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 7 P , , 4 1 YPC a ' 1 WDF , 3. , r-Lci. 1 8 1 59,99, ED WALK P EL i}*Â£LA 28' 9.99' HEAS MERS. 28 Cl~~0~â€ž*; ,) (60.00,3 8 p~~ ~ (30.000 RED CAP (N 75009 E STONE WALL 6 . BOC . 21 A WATER VALVE' SET WATER AP FL 3 VALVE 28' 28 C SE CONC WALK 9018 AP STONE WALL - 4 CONC, CURB 30 (7Â¥1437 30' i IMPROVEMENT SURVEY & GUTTER .40#b WEST M~G CL WALK BOC 44Â£44 " - BOC LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, Al CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, STREET PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION 210 S. GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT \4 THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FIRST DI SCO\IRED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE/FAX (970> 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL dave@aspeninfo,com 21 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHO\â€¢N HEREON, Job no. 32155 NOM 25, 2002 0 SHEET 2 OF 2 1405~4~,EMEAS. 1~~OMERS.) 4 16.1, '2'QI Sat Mar 22 14: 27: 30 2003 i . ROOFLINE ABOVE - design collaborative, llc. skalko haas 320 oak'ane _ ~ aspen colorado 81611 . phone (970) . 309. 0695 | fax (970) . 920.7822 I | I ENTRY 1 1 - | -fff f e-mail 1 11 3:*E ./ KITCHEN RATE_ 2 BEDROOM --Â·Â· derek@studiobarchitects.net 1 11 90 1--3651 L:60/ x .i 1-REI e 0 Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 2 1 | | | | THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN ~ COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF EE THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN * PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN - COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY | DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL E E _ copYRIGHT 2003 1 RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY 1 G 1 AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, LIVINS AREA OFFICE I W. 1 IER .I. [*El I 1 1 ROOPLINE ABOVE TRUE PRO.EGT NORTHAIRROM NORTH ARROW c 1 1 EXISTING PLAN - PANABODE (31 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) (51 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION \425'~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ~yiel 4123/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" \0-HISj SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Â¥ f lk.- vi Li-/- m A ROOFLINE ABOVE 11 1 - 11 1 11 1 -41 -- -1 -- - - f f f TI -- -1 -- -- 1 1 Â«114 ROOFLINE ABOVE ~Rev.1 Construction issue date: Drawin Title TRUE PROJECT Al EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) 261 ExISTING NORTH ELEVATION 20 HALLAM STREET c21 EXISTING ROOF PLAN - PANABODE NORTH ARROM NORâ„¢ ARROW ExISfING CONDITIONS 415/ SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A-HISSCALE:1/4"= 1'-0" ~415/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0Â· Sheet #: A-HIS eou mitiEK Al!Â° Fri Mar 21 19: 09: 45 2003 f /Â»1 9 3 0,1 0 -33 - 9 Â·1 U~ design collaborative,llc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 Â·'sHTNEL MITH GRATING BEIK - ' I. skalko haas 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 1 1 - I 1 E------7 I phone (970) . 309.0695 -1 1.-L _ - U V U 1 - (11 fax (970).920.7822 EXISTING FOOâ„¢RINT OF PAN AeomE ABOVE F x-*-- 1 61 1 --= 1 1 11 1 18 R 9 -7,1 = ID'-0 1/211 - 1 ~ derek@studiobarchitects.net - 4 <19 e- mail < \ 11 / ur - - 14 / 1 i. MECHANICAL 43 1 \-/ 1 .,4 ".....4-n /~ i \ / 2. ~ 1 7 15-0 11â€ž 1 F 11 i il 3 ER,B# 1 1 m fr; ly' 1, . 11 Â·- -- J COLLABORATIVE LLC, Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN | 1 1 , 1 6 lili THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 1 ~ ~ ~ | CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE i' l , j ~ PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN _ 1 BEDROOM PEN - L _ - - 1 i 1 Li,~ *A - _ _ _I~ ~ 1 COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 i' '~ -- 1 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR i ------.-1 - PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN i * COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY 9 1 K.----- DESIGN COLLABORATNE L.L.C. SHALL 1. I |~ ~| if_ _~__ Â· * ~ RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY 1 1 AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 4 ~~ COPYRIGHT 2003 2%.1. t'' R,2-...'9.<:-1.3,1 . f.:1 Ink-/j:./.::Â·.- .11Â·.=, '2.-----I. /1.1:- -11- -11 1< _ ~ CON-TINS HALL ON Pim IATIONS ABOVE ~ - ~ / .c -r_ - C -.- ( 1 5 - ~ 1-% 1 \ 11. I L/ :4 9 ~ BATH k CLOSET 1 22: MECHANICAL 0/ ~ GE' U 13684 1-ER' ' 1 -- 6 /hLF- =enxe poo,PRINT 0 PAN ABODE ABOVE -lp - -1_1 BOOKSHELP BUMP-OUT ABOVE | 4/ 1 1 1 1 0 1 11 1 0- 1 0 0 a) a) E-b 11UE PROLOT CD 44 L 1 13 /Ah - ' (3 ' 43 / 4/ NORâ„¢ AMROM NORIMM.OM of E ' / 1 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN 0 CO CO ~dil,/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-00 9-1/ I NORTH f f 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 14/-------- tuffÂ¢_27 11 / - -1 ~ ,--31 1.-4Ub W -r-11 kia j â€ž1UM Z.1 1"< g~ 2%4%4~warwn#trdi,Â»Â·--Â·Â·-Â·cip----og,~."# . - 1 U EXISTINe It 4 Il ~-,ir-,plfl-A ,7'I-->~T~- 'Ir UNÂ· 7'r - f. 3 - -- 1 \-1f 0 - F . -. sl -ff_ " El - -AIL _ _AIL - 11IL~_~UIL _I -fl 1 1 GE Â£ 7 1 1, 11 1 4 â€ž----1 ~ 1 1 ENTRY 1 ' CLOSET r- - - --. --1 1 1 1 f 1 ..a LIVINe AREA 5 KITCHEN 1 1< i ~ _-1 1 1111 1 : 1 GE' 0 Â»-Â« 1 1 1-ER' Â·Â·l~ 1 1.0 1 1 ! il 9,21 i 9 0 ~ 1 --Â· -(30 - i 3 1..1 1.2 1 rF------u---2+- ---: --6:j-1-------- - 1 1 1 04 Al j L 1_,F% 1 1 -L @ 31 - i Z - 2 -1. KAL-MAL- 91</1.16HT ABOVE i i 3 -h L_______________---____---1 1 i. m R 4 Co-) pORv i==1 - a / 1 1 '.,=- eATHERING AREA i 22 i 1-REI - -- =1 N 4 / i ,zÂ·_:rmul# pura_-la ../ 1 13**1 1 - 1 - --f---------] QUANTUM FOL.DIN# Â·r~CK 1 i . -- -- ' ' -Â· --- =- - ----1 ON 1 4 . ---- --42.. 1 Fi jil rri- MUI:> AREA ~6 L. Â·Â·- .-I=-1 59*13 . 1 - (17" . - L riININe AREA I~ ~ .... / -2- 1101 j ------- 16 1 BIRIDGE . , i 1 i.13 \ 11 ,/HALL 1 1 rERI 1/1 1 1 : ' REF .~ ",1 -etc----4====== -======D / ~ 1 -2/.-_.--_,i i j - ...4~, 1.1:. .:1 4 111 111 1\ 11 /1 9 L. --- 1 9 Â·1 ..=~...1., 1 HE - 9.Eli 2. --1 1--------Â£,~~."Â·/,i'>,s<'..... -<. >>,"40/, , 1,<, t.ot.v//.y>..Â·Â·b.. .i //27).Â·Â»Â· -/Â·p/'f ,: Â¢. i. /.â‚¬Â·Â·Â·o~ /1'.4///>Â·4/.':/.M.1 -- -â€¢.e**,*mA*=*IM!râ€¢-Affq--'4'~Â£*9#**r,~4*yAs,wÂ»*Â»*Â»,w.Â·a~~11 __ rl't *-7,"./*'..11 BUILT IN BOOKSHELVES 111 111 * 111 * 111 - ..1 L..1 -1 111 111 111 111 41 111 1 1 -4) Rev. ~ Construction issue date: Drawing Title: PROPOSED PLANS 320 HALLAM STREET â„¢UE PROET Sheet#: ti i 4 1 /Ah 0 41, 2, 45, 430 , 2, 71% (21 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN tly ~A2.1/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH A-2.1 11 - l_r pUEI }Se/\A Ttt~ Al! O ~- _ - --2#444#-LT-l,Â»--ml# r r 21 19:07:56 2003 /III I qtll t - f f d 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 design collaborative,llc. 1 11 skalko haas 320 oak lane -- - phone(970).309.0695 -- -- - EXISTING -_- - /~~h~ aspen colorado 81611 r- -J PPE PL E XI TIN S A IN SE M T OFI e ITH fa x (970) . 920. 7822 IMI A PR DU T e-mail -r~ 43 derek@studiobarchitects.net EXPOSED B Xq PANELINS TO BE APPLIED Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 1 |1 CEDAR FRAM/NS YV THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT OVER TOP COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE ---2*t35E-35IEttE_1.-__d ~'~~j PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN LEXAN TRANSLUGENT COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF d - - -1 THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN CEDAR SHINeLES COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY RIDGE VENT DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY KAL- L SKY leHT AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 1 COPYRIGHT 2003 fia -- 11 - - BRI GE TO IE TO EXI TI -- - RO'F 0. 1 2 --- 1 1 / ~hj I - n -- -- -- - 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 /el TRUE PROJECT 4-4 4 4 1 4---1 / (-3- , LC- , (3- , *,Rm Â·Â·Â·m â€žaâ€žw A-OM / 1 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN NORTHI h f \t ~J 301 90 - 555 Construction ~Rev.~ issue date: Drawing Title: - 2~ZE- 2-r PROPOSED ROOF PLAN & CONTEXT ELE ATION Sheet #: /21 PROPOSED CONTEXT ELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET A-2.2 SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0" eouep!SeH se H Pnr 320 Hallam Str~End eAA - uedsv Jo Al!3 Sat Mar 22 14: 52: 4,1 2003 N r d a Â¥ design collaborative, llc. - / - - - - 1 TA KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT 320 oak lane ' skalko haas -ELEE-125=ar aspen colorado 81611 A T.O. RIPeE BEAM phone (970).309. 0695 fax (970).920.7822 e-mail derek@studiobarchitects.net Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 1 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN eABLE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 1 T.O. PLATE DINING BUMP-OUT COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN ELEVOK*' PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 T.O. PLATE BRIDeE LOW COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 41 COPYRIGHT 2003 1 1 1 1 1 1 11:lili IL 11'11111 -/0111'lilli@' 44 A T.O. PLPND. MAIN LEVEL PT--------------------------------------- 3 /1 h PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION - ADDITION 2 A3.1-SCALE-:1/4"=1-Â«--------- 11 1 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 T.O. GONG. LOMER LEVEL CO I --23 T 1 1 1 T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT 1 T.O. RIDGE BEAM - -- --- - - I 6 T.O. PLATE PORCH OUTBACK '.A 1 2 , 1]i. 1 1 ~Il FI[Il 'Illit. '31 LL I , !11Â·1~ 1! i MI-111, 1~1 -i' i !: !1.I :11 i. ''1 Â·i m :499 E ---- _-_-_-_-_ AT.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE ELEV.IIO'-5" 4 T.O. PLATE BRIDSE HISH 11 /11 88.00 / 11 / 1 1 4 4 / 0 0--floiki n 1 LL 11 4 4 1 1 \ 1 ------------ ------------------- 1 ' 1 T.O. PLAD. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPSE 1 01 .7 I I lili /111 111 1111 1 1 1 1 lili // 111 111 \ lili I 111 111 \lit 1 1 9 .~ ||' Il /11lt d 1 11 Ilu~211 li I 1 T.O. GONG. LISHTMELL BASE issue date: LE===22===22~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEV'~WLK~ Drawing Title: 1 ADDITION ELEVATIONS 6 T.O. CONG. LOMIER LEVEL 20 HALLAM STREET Sheet #: (21 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 ADD eouepls eN se Hi PUBJUC L'gdesVJÂ° 29 f 11 f fi 9 + t i d PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FLUE a 1 PROPOSE TO ADD SKYLISHT TO ROOF . | 6 T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLISHT PROPONE TO REPLAGE EXISTING ROOF 1 -- Â«-0- ELEV.116'-5)/2, IT.O. RIPeE BEAM design collaborative, llc. ~ Â· PROPOSE TO IMPROVE EXISTINe FASCIA skalko haas 1 T.O. PLATE PORCH OUTBACK 320 oak lane 12 aspen colorado 81611 i, phone (970) . 309.0695 7- -Â» -Ir IT-- 1 11 PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTING WINDOW fa x (970) . 920. 7822 CLAD OR WOOD PIINDOWS BY MAUFACTURER LOCATION AND SIZING NITH UPeRADED e-mail derek@studlobarchitects.net TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PATTERN TO MATCH EXISTINe CONDITIONS L 11 Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 TO. PLATE MAIN eABLE ' PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTING STAIRS COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. - 1 11- 1 1 WITH MORE APPROPRIATE HISTORIC SOLUTION ~ ~~ - - CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 1 T.O. PLATE PININe BUMP-OUT THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN (31 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALLAM ST. FACAD E COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL \4130/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY 11/ \11 AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 --------- A T.O. PLMP. MAIN LEVEL ~~~~ ~~~~ - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FLUE Er--------- --------~ 11 1 ~ PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF 1 1 1 1 - PROPOSE TO IMPROVE EXISTINe FASCIA 1 lilli 11 1 1 11~ .1~, lili 1 1 L U.1_1 TRII.I,79.II.IRi L_ - ,#***3 11---------------71-----1-'1 -'f.~--'- r Â·Ir------=222=22=04---Â·-~ PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe WINDOW 1 T.O. CONG. LIGHTMELI- BASE ~ - 1 1 1 E--=~-)ELEV.41'-10" LOCATION AND SIZINe WITH UPGRADED 0 C CLAD OR WOOD WINDOINS BY MAUFACTURER O_LU 1 T.O.GONG. LOMER LEVEL m'zznzazzuzzrmzuz------ ---_2 --Euiv.&44â€ž MATCH EXISTINe CONDITIONS (DO-. TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PArrERN TO PROPOSE TO REFINISH PAN-ABODE STAIN 1&* /1 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION 05 E w E CO E /43 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE co I I SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 - f f ~--[0 [---AND CONNECT PAN-ABODE TO NEFI ADDITION / 13 /23 0 9 7 1 - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe CLAD WINDOW i T.O. KAL-MAL el<Â¥LleHT 1 MITH 7-00 (INTERIOR DIMENSION AT LOPI SIDE) . CONNECTION ELEMENT. CONNECTOR PIECE TO TIE 1 9-4- ELEV.115'-7" TO BUILDINe CODE HEISHT MINIMUMS 4 FOR LEAST 1 T.O. RIPSE BEAM -LN INTO EXISTING PAN-ABODE ROOF CONDITION DUE -I-*I---5/-il--*.J--'lilli-*~ H i--7--2 - AMOUNT OF IMPACT TO PENDINe ICE BUILDUP _ ~~~~-11-- -_ :-2 --- -,-- I IU~~LI~2~--0 CONDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURE IF LOPERED 1 12 tted 1 11 -11=2..E <11'*-31........~ REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOXES 4 METERS 10~ 11 1222102 -,11 -4,-zi~-~!EgpILLIEELE TO MORE ASTHETICALLY DESIRABLE LOCATION $1 '1 " 1 1-1*14 I " '-/1'E i [JEJEC25~17'==' -t~rf==-1 L nutjj Ht-11--2- -2 ' L P--+mtÂ·f-.11,1121.- J L ' 1 I r----==:44~ REPLACE EXISTING WINE>OIN WITH LARGER P41NDOP4 STYLE OF WINDOW TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH ALL NINDOWS TO BE REPLACED 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN GABLE 1 T.O. PLATE PININe BUMP-OUT 2r-=CLUILLILIÂ»-------------Â·---~- - - 1 4 T.O. PLATE BRIDGE HIGH p~ hi ~ A T.O. PLATE BRIDGE LOW il PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACAD E SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" A T.O. PL~152. _.MAIN LEVEL/ BRIDeE ELEV'k-)01-0,5 - PROPOSE TO ADD SKXUâ‚¬,HT TO ROOF 1 1 ro-------------- ---------1--1 PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTING FLUE 11 11 1 - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINS ROOF 11 11 1 11 1~ 11 FF-~Tr~r-F-tEZZLE-prottuTlr..T-T~-7~-7-'--'r--/' 11 11 ~Rev. ~ 11 Construction 11 -_Ll-Â»-- PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe WINPOPi LL==~ | _ 1 T.O. CONS_LIGHTÂ»IELL BASE U.,1~ _ 11, issue date: 1 ELEV. 41'-10" ~| || I LOCATION AND SIZING MITH UPGRADED - In - H I CLAD OR WOOD WINDOWS BY MAUFACTURER ADDITION ELEVATIONS TO BE DETERMINED Drawing Title: - _ 1 T.O. CONG. LOFIER LEVEL rtfill___L:..1 _....~~ L_LIE_2_________---------- 32 HALLAM TREET RE- PROPOSE TO REFINISH PAN-ABODE STAIN Sheet #: (23 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION -,1-11- A-3.2 A3.2SCALEri/4"=1'..0" LELPROPOSEDSQUIHELEVATION PAN-ABODE SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ADD - uedsv Jo 43 ~ Sat Mar 22 14: 40: 19 2003 JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL REVIEW DIRECTORY INDEX July 9th, 2003 Q.JibLE-Ri JUDY HAAS A.0 COVER SHEET / CONTACT REFERENCE / FAR CALCULATIONS po box 330 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT SURVEY aspen, colorado 81612 Al.0 VICINITY MAP - 320 ]NEST HALLAM PROPERTY tel 470.425.6848 tel (studio) q-70 .425. 5840 Al.5 PROPOSED SITE AND TOPOeRAPHIE PLAN fax 6170.425.6840 A2.0 EXISTINe HISTORIC CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION A2.1 LOPIER Â¢ MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED PLANS A2.2 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS Â¢ CONTEXT ELEVATION DESIeNERS: ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE, LLC. Aa.1-3.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS derek m. skalko; principal designer A4.1 BUILIPINe SECTIONS judy haas; project designer AIO.1 HIND>ON 4 DOOR SCHEDULE 320 oak lane aspen, colorado 81611 '' tel quo.304.0645 fax 4-70.420.7822 j i - 11 / * 11 STRUCTURAL ~'~ CONSULTANTS: eLEN]NOOD STRUCTURAL 4 CIVIL; INC. jim romeo; professional engineer 4=L F consulting structural engineers 2425 south grand avenue, suite 102 glenwood springs, colorado 81601 tel 470.428.0135 Fax 470.428.4804 . a 11 eENERAL MIN 6-2-NTE-A-LLO_E=: *.). -3â‚¬--a~ 2:j J :-2/5.5 1- 1 1 Ells#li design collaborative,llc. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS skalko . haas Zoning: RA Lot Area: 3000 50. FT. 1 -PAR - Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1,500 562. FT. arose Area (sf) Item * Main Level (included: pan-abode 1,378 Ir---lr--~ ~f 1-1- 1.1.-: ' 12,1.-' rt.'-1 Â·' T I -11'-1 .--, Tr- i :-1 I , rl ;, 1 1 541521 4 main level addition) ELLLLU111Â£U-ILLUL111111.-L111-aLLLELJ=U=U=UU=Illili 9~Â·it-I lICUILUJUJUJUL=pUJUJ IlllII * Lovver Level 450 A - |~~~I 42===~dÂ·'ll IHOLLIE~ I'~~Il Â·Â·~1- countable towards FAR) 'MT' Tll lilli (8.1 percent of lower level (76.4 countable) 11~~ 111~ lili ~1111111111111[111111111111 MP=I==IÂ«=I=~uÂ«*Ir- 1.-4 TOTALS 1,454.q 1Â»~11192~j~ ~212~411.,t#E#[30#11~1mill'â€¢ prfl-1-~Elf-1--1-4-t--f--4--IN--~i.t 11111~~~~~IllI~1111111111111111 111 ~11[!IlllIL 1,454.4 < 1,500 - FAR is OK Notee: A) The lower level (600 54 ft In plan) consists of a sq. footage of wall area 20' x 30' x q'-6" In depth. The lower level also contains a light weil of 3' x q'-6,1 x 6'6" In depth, bringing the total wall surface area of the lower level to 5,875.5 eq feet of surface area. Of this total, the light well area and 6" of perimeter area around the structure will be exposed, bringing the exposure percentage to 475.5 sq. ft.,which counts for 8.1% exposure to be used against FAR. Thu Jun 42 00: 50: 08 2003 j N UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT D \61ER' S CERTI FI CATE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT COLORADO DOES HEREBY SUBDIVIDE AND REPLAT THIS REAL PROPERTY UNDER THE NAME KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ESTATE OF MARGARETE A, UHL BEING THE RECORD OWNER OF LOTS N, 0, AND P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, AND STYLE OF LOT N AND 0, AND LOT P UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. i LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, EXECUTED THIS __ DAY OF ______, 2002. THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL CITY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, BY: BYi PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO ANTON UHL, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE JULIE GRANT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF COLORADO > >SS COUNTY OF PI TKI N > THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF , 2002 BY ANTON UHL AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A, UHL. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, STATE OF _-_____-D ' NOTARY PUBLIC >SS COUNTY OF ________) THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF ---- , 2002 BY JULIE GRANT AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE-Of MARGARETE A. UHL, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 64 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, ED GRVL ALLEY NOTARY PUBLIC SET COR X VICINITY MAP AP VD-W N SET SPI SCALE TI TLE CERTI FI CATE AP SHED N WIRE FL NO 62 1 INCH = 10 FEET THE UNDERSIGNED, A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN. INC, tock THE PERSONS LISTED AS OWNERS ON THIS PLAT DO HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE WITHIN .TR D REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PLAT NOTES 42 DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCRUMBRANCES EXCEPT VIR# EAIED Wiwij.-8 66 6P SHED 0 5 10 15 20 THOSE LISTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE, ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE FACTS STATED 1,?Thls Landmark Lot Split Plat has been prepared pursuant to and In accordance with AP SHED S 6600911'E' 60 , AP PVMT ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE, THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT City Council Ordinance Number 36 <Series of 2002), Historic preservation / OF TITLE, NOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD Commission Resolution Number 32 (Series of 2002), and the Subcllvlslon Exemption , 60*,4, , 3 BOXES NOEL AND AGREED THAT STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC,, NEITHER ASSUMES NOR WILL BE CHARGED Agreement recorded with the PitkIn County Clerk and Recorder as Reception LOT H 22 SPRUCE NOEL AP SHE 69 Number , The lands affectecl by this Plat are subject to the terms and SET COR, WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON ANY STATEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN. 7%29--0-Th-,5-a~de-ramspronval:outl~5& S 2'C::N-~ 2:5 DgYNIC~:to~h~~erEVw'th / DATED,_____________, 2002. 71 79 the land as covenants burclenIng the same, 22 SP CE NOEL 72 AP PVIIT , TITLE ' n ' STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. (30.00') 2,?The 3,000 square foot lot (Lot P) Is entitled to 1,500 square feet of FAR floor area, RED CAP 620 E, HOPKINS AVE, and the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and 0) Is entitled to 3,080 square feet of FAR , 9018 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 76 floor area, / i STATE OF COLORADO) 3.?Owner reserves the right to request a conditional use approvel to develop an / Ap WD FL )SS addltional detached reslclential dwellIng unit on the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and , ELEC & COMM. 74 O>5 It is recognized that approval of the site plan and design would be required , FL COUNTY OF PIKTIN ) EASEMENT 6, - as well BK 524 PG 828 THE FOREGOING TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS LOT 4,?No further subcllvlslon of the lancls depicted hereon shall be permitted nor will /V / DAY OF ,2002 BY _____________ AS _________ OF STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC, additional clwellIng units be built, unless applicable approvals are obtained pursuant ~' WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL to the Aspen Land Use Code In effect at the time of application, 0 MY COMMISSION EXPIRESi 5,?All new development on the depicted properties will conform to the dimensional ,/ requirements of the R-6 zone district, with the exception of the varlances approved by , the HPC under Resolution No. 32, Series of 2002. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an ~ applicant for new development on the subject lots maintains the rights afforded under , NOTARY PUBLIC the Land Use Code to request variances from the cllrlensional requirements of the / zone district from an entity with the authority to hear and decide upon such requests, , f LOT P 6,?Historic Preservation Commission Resolution Number 32, Series of 2002, effectively / approved a 500 square foot FAR bonus (alreadv reflected In the FAR limits 0 / 4 established under note '2/ above), a 1' west slde yard setback varlance for the m / LOT k . Victorian, a 3' west slcle yard setback variance and a 4' rear yard setback varlance for <6 / 0 9 2 3,000 SQ,FT,+/- SURVEYOR' S CERTIfI CATE 0 a shed that Is located along the alley, 5' rear yard setback varlances for two other Sm LOT N AND 0 -1 2 0,0689 ACRES +/- I, DAVID W, McBRIDE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN JUNE 2002 AND JULY 2002, sheds that are located along the alley and a 4' east slole yard setback variance for the 1*' easternmost of these sheds, a 2' west side yard setback varlance for the Pan Abode, .9* A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTII]N AND SUPERVISION OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED and a 2' combined slole yard setback varlance for the Pan Aboole, 2 / PROPERTY, THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES, BUILDING ENVELOPES, ' Of UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, 6,000 SQ.FT.+/- / 7,?Owner and future owners of the Pan Aboole structure located on Lot P, Block 42, City and Townslte of Aspen, will not apply for a building permit to demollsh said structure 0,1377 ACRES ~/- 2 TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER # PCT-17086L, DATED MAY 20, 2002 ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THIS MAP, THE CONTROL SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1.10,000 WITH AN ACCURACY TO 0,001 at any time, an agreement reached ln 45 . OF AN ACRE AND THAT THE SURVEY WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRS 1973 TITLE 38, for> HPC's approval of a 500 square foot floor area bonus as part of this lot Split, a .4 2 54 ARTICLE 51 AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. LOT p 4 SPRUCE 8,?Pursuant to Section 26.420.020, Benefits, of the Aspen Land Use Code, accessory SIGNED THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2002 clwelling units <ADUs) or cash In lieu fees shall not be required on/of the subject / properties. 36 TTNWD ) DAVID W. McBRIDE RLS 16129 51 9, Within thirty (30) days of the recordation of this plat, the applicant shall obtain ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 0, from the City Engineering Department encroachment licenses for the several encroachments 210 S. GALENA ST. Into the Public R.O.W. (two sheds, the fence, and clumpster) ASPEN, CO, 81611 1 Z , 20 CTTNWD , g -- CITY MONUMENT 4 4 *320' ,~~ CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 3.6 N AP ~ LOT Q THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LI]T SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ASPEN ON THIS --__ DAY OF , 2002 AS ORDINANCE NO. 36 SERIES OF 2002 AND RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. ____________ ~,,~ OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. S75009'11'E 43 AP HSE NOEL SIGNED THIS _-- DAY OF , 2002. BASIS OF BEARIF 9019 AP WD '304* (90,00') 'GS 44 47 AP BAY AP HSE NOEL ~ ATTIEST, 45 ' HELEN KLANDERUD, MAYOR KATHRYN S. KOCK, CITY CLERK AP BAY 46 AP CONC j YEL CAP ' 48 41 9184 LEGEND & NOTES 4 / THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY 7 P NE / AP WALK' CI TY ENGI NEER' S APPRDVAL Pea84 # THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 2002. WD FC < <30,00 URB & GU FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR M TH CAP AS NOTED ~ 39 8 CITY ENGINEER, NICK ADEH POL WD 0.32N POL WD F SPIKE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL N ED WALK POL 009'11.v i (60,00,3 37 AP CABIN 0,33N 27 POSTED ADDRESS IS ' 304 AND 320 WEST HALLAM ST. ' 28 CTTNWD 40 8 PINE TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYi STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL (270.00') COMMITMENT NO, 00030505 DATED, SEPT. 19, 2002 SET COR. THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN ON N THIS ---_- DAY OF _____-_----_--, 2002. O SET CORNER NO. 4 REBAR W/RED CAP CAP 16129 WATER VALVE AP FL ,) 32 SEE SHEET 2 FOR ALL SURVEY FIELD MEASUREMENTS 28 CTTNWD RED CAP DIRECTOR, JULIE ANNE WOODS SE CONC WALK E APSTONE WALL CLERK AND RECORDER' S ACCEPTANCE CONC C TTER 4 ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, 30 CTTNWD COLORADO AT --- O'CLOCK __ M. ON THIS _--- DAY OF ________------_, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK _____ AT PAGE ________ AS RECEPTION NUMBER __________________. WES,11 CL WALK BOC =G CLERK AND RECORDER, SILVIA DAVIS 44-4.44Mly BOC <74.38' WIDE) STREET PREPARED BY 1 INDEX ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S. GALENA STREET . BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT \,4 THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU SHEET 1 SITE PLAN, CERTIFICATES & NOTES, VICINITY MAP ASPEN, COLO. 81 611 FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED SHEET 2 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY, EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 PHONE/FAX ( 970) 925-381 6 . UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspeninfo.com a FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWN HEREON SHEET 1 OF 2 Job no. 32155A JUNE 7, 2002 / REVISED 12-03-02 Â®0 UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT 01 E 9050 4 64. GRAVEL ALLEY SCALE ED GRVL SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET - CDR AP WD-W AP SHED L SET SP' 0 5 10 15 20 NOM TR SH VIRB ED â€¢ S75005' â€¢ , , CS 75009 SHED #P SHED .E. 9000 0.50 MEAS. AP S ED . 7,14ip pl:Â·i SHI-n AP . BOXES NC~ PAVEMENT LOT M SPR CE N AP SHE , 2 ' 31>922 , E h '43 22 pTAKE N 0.00,2 AP PVMT , , FL 22 RED CAP 9018 1% 1 73 . AP WD FL ELEC & COMM. FL /3 ~' EASEMENT 6, LOT ~ * Ix BK 524 PG 828 /2 / -l l 1 1 , l / & .2 28.2 ,/ PATIO LOT 0 i 2 , NABODE geRi , ,&24 1 / LEGEND & NOTES 9 - 02 1@ 1 o FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR \4 TH CAP AS NOTED 33, 4 1 9 SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SUREY CONTROL 2 STORY tk 1 LOT p 4 SPRU)ie POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 \EST HALLAM ST. ' VICTORIAN / 14*led 6- -8- WOOD FENCE Cd WOOD F-RAME 6 y r, 4/ 36 ~~F~ 36' 3 4 1& y -- \4 RE FENCE HOUSE 6 2.39 T O UTI LI TY BOX i e ae, 50' 9 Ve 20 Cly#QAFE . S 22 Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER , 1 . 941402 <6000' -- CITY MONUMENT â€¢ / SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 <30 00' 42 920' ' LOT Q 3,6 N AP FL 1 4, 1,5 '. 1 ,~ TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY, PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, COMMITMENT NO. PCT-17086L <S75009 . '11'E> ~ AP HSE , *6, .. / 1 2rapp, DATED JUNE 27, 2002 BASIS OF' BEARINGS PIN ' '304' ag 99*43, 2 d DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED AP WD 1000, 3.65' 4 12,4, l~ . 1 <9a002 . 70 / CALLS IN < ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 44 qi 10 -: ' ~~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED AP BAY AP HS ~1 -â€¢ ' 6,8, â€¢ 6 ' AP BAY â€¢ PA 6 AP CON ' ' ~4 .. i YEL CAP ~ ' ~' ' 79 2-20' CITY OF ASPEN, 4 1 1 YPC 8 20,0, WOF . 1 1 , l poi w 0.32N POL WD F ED WALK P EL 5.4, .Ale;LI-42 28' ' 9,99' MEAS. 59.99' MEAS. AP CABIN 0.33N 28 C.9.U: 94, 1 44*b (90.00') (N 75009'11'W) ' 3 8 Pi94* BOC 319, 4 WATER VALVP 28 Cl~ SET WATER AP FL VALVE 28' RED CAP 9018 SE CONC WALK E STONE WALL AP STONE WALL 5 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY & GUTTER 30 CYQiQk; 30' WEST M~G CL WALK BOC 41Â£44 . - BOC LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, 1\~ CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S. GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT I N THI S PLAT M THI N THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO, 81611 FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspenlnfo,com m FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOhN HEREON. Job no. 32155 NOM 25,2002 0 SHEET 2 OF 2 f 'E ~EAS. Sat Mar 22 14: 19: 30 2003 . I UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT GRAVEL ED GRVL ALLEY SCALE SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET COR AP WD-W - SET SP' AP SHED L Â·OOAN g~ TRASH i 0 5 10 15 20 .*u. Efff- 4 SHED AP S ED ,....AP PVMT +- +P SHED MIE.4. 00 CS 75009'11'E..90.00 .. 1 ~~16-n AP . BOXES NO~~~-'23Â¥ENT LOT At 21R CE N AP SHE I , SHED ' E 1 2' a f 22 P'l~CE N ir f ''(0 /4 / â€¢ P / 'Q /3 l LOT ' !~ 1 le , N i l 1 l / 61 . 1 282 1 if \ PATIO <r- 12 0 0 LOT o a. 242 ' / 1 2 -4 5 I ca . -_.. i 'r.2Â»1 LEGEND & NOTES 2 - ~@ l 1 -1 feÂ» - J bj 1 i il l Ell; 40: iii 1 3.3, + i -3 li 18 .; d O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR M TH CAP AS NOTED i 1 e SPIKE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL 2 STORY / . 6 i ' 4-a. 9 N / POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 6EST HALLAM ST, ' 2,~~36' L-/125 O UTI LI TY BOX -6- MOOD FENCE 05 - \14 RE FENCE 0 , 05 HOUSE i le 33, 5,05 20 CT ( f ( .~0< Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER / r.i 1 . '1*18.1 â€¢innABLE -- CITY MONUMENT , â€¢ ' / A . 6 / SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 42. '320' i Â· LOT 3,6 N AP FL Q / TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. (875009'11 t> AP WD AP HSE 4 *6. .I I COMMITMENT NO. PCT-17086L BASIS OF BEARINGS PIN 1 1 / DATED: JUNE 27, 2002 89*99p'MEAS, 3,65' 4 ~ 12,4' l /A . 1 (90,00,> 44 qi a AP BAY AP HS ' . , tri 4. / .~1~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED x j . 5999, (60,00 (30.00 AP BAY . ' ph ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED AP CON i 9-ll i YEL CAP 2 CALLS IN C ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 9184 70 l AP WALK 1 1-7 -- 79 2 ' ' CITY OF ASPEN, 4 YPC a , WD F Fl , 1 1 0-: 30 ED WALK P i-L #411-42 28' 9,99, HEAS. NEAS, 94, 1 28 01'~V~,*; '3 8 PINZ-, l (90,00') (N 75009'11'W) E STONE WALL , BOC .6 . 31* v WATER VAL VP SET AP FL 3 WATER - VAL VE 28' 28 C RED CAP e SE CONC WALK 9018 AP STONE WALL CONC 00/92 4 GorÂ» I MPROVEMENT SURVEY 4/ R 30 clgwa 30' WEST M~G CL WALK BOC 41Â£44 " - BOC LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, 14 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, STREET PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S. GALENA STREET - BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT WI THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FI RST DI SCOVERED SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspenlnfo.com 21 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWN HEREON. Job no. 32155 NOM 25, 2002 ' SHEET 2 OF 2 \ 43'E MEAS 14050 49'E N75010' 16.1, Sat Mar 22 14: 27: 30 2003 lili ~3-6.. 1 Ilelb.';:'#.- -Ir/Orris"*- ROOFLINE ABOVE design collaborative, llc. skalko haas 1 1 320 oak lane Â· 4 .Â·~~ Â·~ 2-~ -: 4.4-~ Â·:? 1.~Â· 11 -Â· 5-- Â·1 M~~~m~ J 1 f . 1 = ; m . . 1 fax (970).920.7822 Â· I aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309.0695 1 3 [In Elli. A Ch:&?g*Emiz...25Â§23@~~ 4 1 11 ENTRY â‚¬ 1 /7 derek@studiobarchitects.net :1 1 KITCHEN % ~~-*97ATH BEDROOM I ~ < 4 e-maIi 11 - 0 R 2 -L=J X - ~ COLLABORATIVE L.L.C ..\ 1 j 1 r-TI----- 2 Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 r f f - 1 1 1 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF E COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN -------------------- -- ---I --- ILILLU~LITI'bg THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 0 6 . , DESIGN COLLABORAMVE L,Llc, SHALL COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY 1 & RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 1 ~ Â· 1 COPYRIGHT 2003 1, r- .1 LIVINe AREA OFFICE I 1# - 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROOFLINE ABOVE TRUE PROJET NORTH ARROM NORTH ARROW / 1 1 EXISTING PLAN - PANABODE 23_EXISTINGWESTELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) c5-3 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 11111 NORTHI ROOFLINE ABOVE 11 1 11 1 11 1 f f 71 -- - -- -- f /Â»11* 1 E-7113] j Ctizz~ 11 i lilli- 11 REIZ~ ROOFLINE ABOVE ~Rev. ~ Construction issue date: Drawin Title EXISfING CONDITIONS TRUE PRO.ET 222 EXISTING ROOF PLAN - PANABODE NORTH ARROM NORTH AdRROM (43 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) (61 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 320 HALLAM STREET \0-HIV SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" Sheet#: A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" '*5/ SCALE : 1/4" = 100" NORTHI A-HIS f-F 1-,'1~2;72;Â£*110 Judy Haas Residence Fri Map 21 19: 09: 45 2003 rppi 4011/ i :37 f-te" 4' 3-3 e I ' I I . . . design collaborative, llc. 320 oak lane L 6+fr Vt,1 MITH SRATINe OVZR skallro haas 1-9,-4 , aspen colorado 81611 or) U--- 7:11-2 -Â»\-{ E--------7 in /7 phone(970).309.0695 ~ fax (970) 920.7822 2 14. 5 2 ~# . ~ - . . EXISTINS FOOTPRINT OF PAN ABODE ABOVE . . 4.1 I I /h L,2 *4 ....i. .1., .+ Â·: ..4.-4 Ul e-mail 1 / I .4 0: - -21 derek@studiobarchitects.net 21 1 1 0 R *7"=10'-6 1/2" / 1 -:I 1 7, 1 *11 / Up- - - . MECHANICAL '~ c-1 , \,j 11 / 18 -0 1111 Â·Â·Â·- I r--1/i I \ / , i /14 . vii V i Â©2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 5=17-7 23 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 1 . A . PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN L _ g ~ ' ' |' 1 ' CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 1 11 ' # DEN BEDROOM Â· bl= a . I COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF . THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 1 1 li 1 51, COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 2 ----c. 1 i 1 1 1 PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 4 . 11 12 COLLABORATIVE L.L,C, ONE FRIDAY 4 0 DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL O P ! 1- ---4 - el I M RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY e Â· AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, .Â·., 010 11 1 t. COPYRIGHT 2003 L B,Â¥â‚¬11 1 g I. E-----------7 . 1 - A- 71; - 43) j <cÂ»~COT]Ne HALL ON FIteR POINP~,TIONS ,â€¢BOVE ~ - ~ : CLOSET . ~ 7 A ,LA / BATH - ~ MECHANICAL 'f. lay, , [38@ 97. . V Q 1 J Dll . 3 ====== 1 - EXISTING POO,PRINT OF PAN ABODE ABOVE *0: ~4:1 -~ Q ~ ~-- -'&*Ii i'J.,j. +4,4.Li:IÂ·Â°)..~ .':::.-* ~Â·.Â·~Â· "Â·,~:.41Â·:. 42Â» / " L~ . n.-0 '14/H -+16 15'-10" 14'-2" 1 , B" 'LaÂ£-/'' \ 21'-4" * I I , 81 8,1 1 3 , 12' , 22' 1 , (D 1 30' , IN' , 97' I . I 0 1 7ai .- - fl /0-3 /01 0 CO (D - L CE- , 4-9 , 43-, 43 / 43' , i N E /1 3 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN co ~â‚¬0]~ SCALE : 1/4" = 100" 2 cO -28 CO I E M CBBA (66 1 ( DD 1 Â· \241 \4341/ <*4./ -V 41 21 41(* 1 6 (9 30' , W , 1 37' D . I 1 61-4" , 4'-8~" , 2'-2" , 11'-8" p q' 1i, ,2 2 , 1 ,&0 9, 8'-5~~" , 41-25â€ž 2'-10~" 2'-5* 1'-2' '9' 3.OR" 1 '-511 '-61Â· 1 -01Â· * I . . . . . . 4 ' RO ' R.O. ' ' ' ' ' RO. ' *0 ' ., 9.0. ' ' le er 8 8 NBM "DIM Ng , _k -Â» :27 : CLIT) 413 - . = i % % - CeÂ» 11// \- -\ f '<D ~ 1 le-/ , ,.4,â€ž4â€žx-//W,.r//*â€ž7,<7,7//k.â€ž .-f/N~/i///////,~$UL.///.'7/,p,L.07/'/Hu/*'WVLW;4/p"/,f,4'~ ~_~~t~~~ly~* - -=1=- ' 21.--_1**Iiâ‚¬7-=--fir--71 *%04#**~...m'w--99--1 13 Â·'Â·.,Â·Â·1Â·' 49--f.Â¥ '44 / -#M............ ..~ u J .[~ 1 ENT,P.-r f 3_ 1 I'Lid~PL+3][ 2 I L f TOILET r 01 , - 0 ...1\1 -1 <7> I iÂ»1 1 - 1 01 --- /& 0 1- 91-*fk ~ 1% H 1'-4 ~ -ki 1 riawl , I r.%61 -1. . I 1 31 11 CLOSET _ ~ A 23 1 n 1-El COA _ Zk -1 ~ Ria-1 1 1 4 k LIt/INS AREA 1 i KITCHEN 1 -*1 1~ ~| 5 10( _ _ _ ijtif// IPFLE 11 1 1 r g <DE Â·~ Mi 3 4 --71 /134 ~ /1/3 1/ 2 1 E /42 01-0 6 COUR-DrA.RD j lfÂ·~Â·jÂ·. <Â·fÂ·f ig:k E--T--7- -1-r - -e.=.==Â·- ----- 4--- --- -pO--7 - 5 69-1 2** 0- I I 00 1 - . Crish 0 ~ 1 1- - I 551 1--__ /5 I 0 , 1-...1/ 7 Â£ M 01 --1 Ch f crepo p<#â€žlr # 4) 1 L KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT ABOVE Â¢ TCHEN ISLA~ i d 1 Q li 7. 1 5 1 783 2 @4 GATHERINe AREA ~ fi33\ 1 9==50 ?r V 097<4#El~*-3 m 1 62,====m- I Q h I " = 57 14 fl -- i.4 *1111 â‚¬ 4 - 1(AN-> -ltpl___--___---LI~-2-2'2---*t= e.. 44- :- '08-4 :~ 7 4 W 'G CA / 1!2*2 | ' ON SWANTUM FOLDING 714ft 636\ 1 1 - 1 MUD AREA ' 101 60 -- r 3.1 1-11 - - . 111 1-- te -1 PININe AREA 11 ITii-1 3 0.- _Â· 111 il! I 1 -- -1 1 9 |iof 1 LU I M * '/HALL ~29-t--7-7--r.--r-T--7 " MASH DRY REF f J~ | 1 j ~61 I \ 11 / 6 =IA N / ~I Ill ~ 41 1.1-1.-4.Ii. 6- -1 - .1 2 ' - ' dttel _... ...cll :mazmm7Im..4.:Yh-4..1&4:1htw*Mew,Yl 0 1 'R/ ---It 9- BUILT IN BOOKSIELVES - 1-1 111 111 111 111 111 111 -.-4--t L, 10- .1 L - a '' 10 6 9 1 111 111 111 5 0 Rev. 1-1 Construction R.O. / 15'-eli 3'-5#' 0,_ca. 6,6, 22511 ' 91 '7 .7 Ah-7 : 11 -1 21-411 , 1-1' 2'-5~ Drawing Title: ED ' ' 0 4 R.O. 'R.O. ' , PROPOSED PLANS 46" Â®' 1 11 30 6 , , i 15' , 22' | 320 HALLAM STREET . . . 0 Sheet #: 1 16' /F 92 0 43 ~ 11 2, /2-1PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN L , ~A2.1j SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 12 // 0 A-2.1 dence puEI Jse/\A - uedsÂ¥ Jo x1!3 101-7 " Thu Jun 12 00: 59: 55 2003 BB C GO / DD A4.1 A4.1 A4.1 f fÂ«fff design collaborative,llc. skalko haas 1 1 1 1 1 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 FLUE FOR SAS FIREPLACE phone(970).309.0695 f a x (970) . 920. 7822 -- -- /73 derek@studiobarchltects.net - -- -- - EXISTING e-mail p- -7 P E L GE XI TIN TREE S A IN SEE H T OF] 6 mi ~~~~~~_~~~_~_~_~_~_~~~~~~ ~LI IMI A PU T -$ 0 411 Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN CEDAR FRAMINS W 11 EXPOSED 3 Ke n COLLABORATIVE LLC. 1 1 1 11 PANELING TO BE APPLIED Â£ A+.1~ ~!i Ii Â·, , THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT OVER TOF' CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF 1 THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 1 COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN _ ~ L._Ptet--mIMHT 4/ CEDAR SHINGLES COPYRIGHT 2003 - - Â«f) PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY RIPSE VENT 1_____L__1__1.KAL-LEBHT BRI GE TO IE TO EXI TIN 1 /2, ROO 1 2 1 1 1 - - - -- I - - - I 5/ 1 ~ ~ -4) 1 1 1 1 1 /A) 1 PROPOSED OOF PLAN i / - - A2.2 SCALE : 1/4" = 100" 43 1 6 + i n4 5141 2 U Construction ~Rev. 1 issue date: Drawing Title: 2-r PROPOSED ROOF PLAN Clri & CONTEXT ELEVATION Sheet #: (21 PROPOSED CONTEXT ELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET A-2.2 SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0" 91 eou~IsemUsIBBeHHO~PEn f pLIEI JseM - uedsv Jo X}!O Thu Jun 12 01: 01: 05 2003 f W Ilx. U-- design collaborative, llc. A T.0- KAL-~NAL SKYLIGHT 320 oak lane skalko haas 7 ELEV. 119'-6" (APPROX.) aspen colorado 81611 M $ T.o. RIPeE BEAM phone(970).309.0695 CU5 M - UL-W 51<LIGIr 5 SIEM ELEY.ile'-4"APPROX) fax (970) . 920. 7822 e-mail derek@studiobarchitects.net Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN | | COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 1 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF 1 T.O. PLATE DININS BUMP-OUT THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 T.O. PLATE BRIDSE LOK PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN gill, - Th#W rVES.UCE f PANELIN 5YSTEM COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL N i 1 AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, a]5TOM WOOI~ MILLEP UNIT ~ CUSQM oP MILE COPYRIGHT 2003 IV F. 11 1 2111~!111 fl KAI- .AL 33 191--W 0( PANE ING PAAELI 6 95 M 95 M 6 T.O. PLYND. MAIN LEVEL 1 1 / 1 h PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION - ADDITION '' 1 1 0) SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 11 11 0 0 11 ~1 71 21 1 T.O. GONG. LOPIER LEVEL U) U) - -- - - - - -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- -- - -- - - - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -0 ~ 0) of E (D 00 00 I /7 'i J - ----4----------1~- 1 T.O. KAL-MAt- SKYLISHT ELEVIMoE"(APPROXJ A T.O. RIDGE BEAM CU51OM - -WAL 511 atr 5~5Â·TEM -TELEV. 118-'Â·24" (APPROX) 1-- 1 ' - - - - - - - - -- - - - 1 T.O. PLATE PORGH OUTBACK 4111%11~11 ~ 11 1 lili :11:. TIll : CU5TOM - 1*-WAI 51<LIUHÂ·T SYMEM AN A T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE TE[5*13*TÂ¥- A T.O. PLATE BRIPSE HISH 1 1&821 1 0 il 1 11 lit BRI 1 929-FIXE 252541 11 /111 111 Eli -i .lilli 11 ~ 11 / - 1 /1~ c / 0 11 / . 2 4 11 , El ~ 292 1 /vii C MW V.Ir \ TY h 11 1 1 I 1 GtkNTUM ( 5) 111 \ Ipma 1 QUARTUM (t) ' lip*06 111 1 1FOLPINEi Ill 40 Il I b FOLOING 96 -hi 1 Ilea poÂ©k 11 GrOREFF ~ ~ 1 TRAEXPOO11 1 1-1=EN_*=11-2=11 1 L5mrer-J L~ ------------------------------- ----- 5Â¥51'EM , 1 T.O. PLFC. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIDGE 4%[Fir:gll'' 11 1 dfj1 611 6 ~ ~~1 \\* J~~ ~ 1 I ntlilli / 1 91111<1/ 11*1111 \\ M' 1 11 It Rev. Construction 1 1 111 1 111 111 j 11-u~ 1 issue date: 134====2==22=29-1 Drawing Title: 1 T.O. CONC. LIGHTFIELL BASE - ~ i ADDITION ELEVATIONS 320 HALLAM STREET ----- 1 T.O. GONG. LOWER LEVEL Sheet #: 221BROPOSED-WEST_ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 ~~11/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ADD pl13 jseM - uedsv Jo x1!3 eiieH OZE Thu Jun 12 00: 51: 20 2003 / /~3 /7 i d PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FLUE a PROPOSE TO APP SKYLISHT TO ROOF 1 TO. KAL-#NAL el<Â¥LIGHT PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF "2[29.1M'-6"(AppRox.) design collaborative, llc. 6 T.O. RIDGE BEAM - - - - ELEV.Ilef-<"CAPPROX.) Frft,#i PROPOSE TO IMPROVE EXISTINe FASCIA skalko haas 320 oak lane PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe WINDOW fax (970) . 920. 7822 1 T.o. PLATE PORCH OUTBACK aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309 0695 I2 10 F7 LOCATION AND SIZINe WITH UPeRADED e-mail derek@studiobarchitects.net 2929-FIX 1 - -|77~= TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PATTERN TO GLAD OR MOOD WINDOWS BY MAUFACTURER 1 1 7%- Ir - 3 MATOH EXISTING CONDITIONS 11 2 1 1' Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe STAIRS - -- COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE - i WITH MORE APPROPRIATE HISTORIC SOLUTION -ELEV.104'-6" THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 2929-FIX | 7 9 7-1 ~ -- N<'-7(d*Af.-:Af: 4&446. 1 T.O. PLATE DINING BUMP-OUT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 12923-Fl, 2929-Fl, 1 IZE20+1,1 ' Â·'..4q, ;;:. AÂ·.:42Â·Â·..Â·;'// COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 6 COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 12929-FIX I (31 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALLAM ST. FACADE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY - DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL 1/ \1 E.2-SCALE:-1/4"=1'-6" RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 -------- 1 T.O. PLAO. MAIN LEVEL ~~~ 1 < - PROPOSE 1-0 REMOVE EXISTIN6 FLUE 11 - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTING ROOF - 1 1 11 i -- PROPOSE TO IMPROVE EXISTING FAMIA 'T$4 b 1~1-- ~~111- -; ~17 -~1 Ir 11 11 1 1~- -1!_d-~ Ii-~~i 1 1- w .4 'I " i- -.A-7 iÂ· -i Â· Â· iÂ· â€ži -1 4- ii__~_.eÂ· -hâ€¢â€¢27Â«Â·Â·3'FL-2-1 1 T.O. CONG. LIeHTÂ»ELL BASE Mi- I'=miR-ll Â»------=IZE=tiz:~ PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTING WINDOW ' 1 I 4 +33'~| |-- ---- iftj -=ttl E-=22 --ELEV.41L-IO" AR] 11-==~4-AR'*E.*14*6:$14{-1 GLAD OR WOOD MINPOINS BY MAUFACTURER TO BEE DETERMINED MULLION PATTERN TO LOCATION AND SIZING WITH UPGRADED M-MA L-I, Â·i'~ ill t,ill"nl lilli MEA~wÂ·]Lf.,21#Fur==222~ C (1) 4- 1 T.O. GONG. L.OFIER LEVEL 1 MATCH EXISTINe CONDITIONS .REE H - M 1 - PROPOSE TO REFINISH PAN-ABODE STAIN . = 4.. 0- 211_PROPOSED_NORTH_ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 0-4) CO E a (41 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE I -1- < KE37-SCALE:1/4"=1+ -64 81 .8 < f, .n, 1'~~OR DÂ»ON AT LOW 6108 f f J 2 0 - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINS CLAD NINI)001 | AND CONNECT PAN-ABODE TO NEW ADDITION 1 1 CONNECTION ELEMENT. CONNECTOR PIECE TO TIE 13- 1 BLEV.*46'--4'APPROX.) .k T.O. 1<AL=t*N~SKYLIGHT INTO EXISTINe PAN-ABODE ROOF CONDITION DUE TO BUILDINe COOEE HEIeHT MINIMUMS 4 FOR LEAST 4 -L~ - -_-nLEV. liq'-6" (APPROX.) -<-- A T.O. RIDE BEAM - - r- .1 -1 11 ~ AMOUNT OF IMPACT TO PENDINe ICE BUILDUP CONDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURE IF LOWERED U.Â·:'~ REMOVE EXISTINe ELECTRICAL BOXES $ METERS To MORE ASTHETICALLY DESIRABLE LOCATION I2 OME-- - 10~ REPLACE EXISTINe WINDOW MITH LAReER MINDOW STYLE OF NINDOIN TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH ALL WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED -t-- I m. 1- 1- 1 -1 || =I' _4-, : :,1-- '4. t 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE - - A T.O. PLATK-gNING BUMP-OUT ELEY. 108'-3" 6 T.O. PLATE BEIPSE HIGH 405 | A T.o. PLATE_BRIIÂ»E LOW 4 1/ \1 5fOREFIEONT 1 ELEV. 108'-O" 51 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACADE 95TEM EEMEEP f A T.O. PLMO. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPSE ELEVXC1-0 PROPOSE TO ADD EM<TLIeHT TO ROOF= PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINS FLUE Fl--------------- ---------i-1 11 11 11 1 1 PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 9 1 -- 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 i --/ 11-7<1 1 1~- ~ 1 PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe WINDOW 1 ~Revq Construction 1- 7 1 T.O. GONG. LIGHTINELL BASE i - issue date: _ : LOCATION AND SIZINS MITH UPel~DED Drawin Title CLAD OR MOOD #141>OVE BY MAUFACTURER ADDITION ELEVATIONS 11 911 + 1 IFI 1 -F - TO BE DETERMINED 6 T.O. GONG. LOKER LEVEL Ilh, IliÂ·- - 11 1 , L L Sheet#: 320 HALLAM STREET PROPOSE TO REFINISH PAN-ABODE STAIN (21 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION A-3.2 /61 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE E.2SEXCE:1/4"=-106' 4 R.~ 2'-44" Thu Jun 12 00: 55: 23 2003 d a gn collaborative, llc. skalk o haas 320 oak lane en colorado 81611 ne (970) . 309.0695 c (970) 920.7822 e-mail @studiobarchltects.net )03 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN OLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 4ED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE tTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN ORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF FORMATION MAY BE USED OR WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN SION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN ORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY .L OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, GHT 2003 (D (D O, ~ 05 E CO 0 - (0 -FE I 0 N 1-1 - riaw- / 1 1- 1 1 Enn 0 .TO.PL. MAIN LML BRIDGE . T.0. PLAD. PAN ABODE 2 7 ELEV. 100'-00 r$4% lwO:Mâ„¢#em,*NÂ«*- 44 - A T.O. PLAP. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPSE VELEV. IOO'-0" | ~ 1.\ . .lili lili - ---- --- --- =11 f ELEV. 100'-70 (V.I.F.) I- . 1 -- ~ STAIR Q L II ~- -~ NOTE: FOUNDATION 4 CRAKIL SPACE EXISTING C-3 ril rtll 1 1 - MAY REPLACE FOUNDATION 4 FLOOR FOR 3" ~ ~ Â·-- | 004 -- I i RADIANT FLOORPACK TO BE DETERMINED ~ 1 - p Rev. UPON DISCUSSION W ENeINEER I ' BEDROOM 1 CLOSET Â·.-,- Construction 11 1 0 6 To. CONC. LleHTPNELL BASE issue date: - - Drawing Title: BUILDING SECTIONS 1 j 7 ELEV. 41'-40" 1 - 4 T.O. CONEÂ·. LORIER LEVEL 9 ELEV. act'.-4, 320 HALLAM STREET ily C - 1. Sheet #: 23 CROSS SECTION: BB (PAN ABODE) 31 CROSS SECTION: CC (BRIDGE) (43 CROSS SECTION: DD (ADDITION) A-4.1 A4.1 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 4110/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" Mly SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" eouepls eH Apnr pu3 jse/\A - uedsÂ¥ Jo x1!0 3 % A - . 9 1 . .. . - 1 1 - 0, 4. .... -' I;.. ..2- . .2 . t. . .a . . . 1 4 . 1 40 21- P f f i ~ .. - .. 5 1. - Â¥ i-, - .- i imm ~ 1/1/Ii ... '5't d !lll i)!M ' U t + 2/1/ 2.9 . : Ill 2 .... p p 0 420 1= 1-/ . A . AA .... 1 - ... - A . . 4< . 9 .7 . V . . .- - . I . I , .- -' . i./ . - \ .2 - . - .- .. 2 -. .V . . 1 9 + t $ . 1 .... . .. 1 9 k - A- . t i d - SPECIAL CASE CUSTOM MINPORS - MALE 1/4" = 1'-O" JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 REST HALLAM STREET AINDOM SCHEDULE 3Â¥MBOL ROUSH OPENINe EAD HEISHT FRO DETAILS 11'PE MANUFACTURER MODEL NOTES T.O. PLIND. PER design collaborative, llc. 0 JAI X H SITUATED FLOOR JAMB BILL HEAD NUMBER skalko haas 320 oak lane 1 1 2'-61" 10'-46" 44 2'-11 3/4" x 5'-5 3/4" 8'-0" FROM T.O. F . LOW R LV . CLAD UNIT - CASEMENT PELLA 3565 - CASEME aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309.0695 A-2 2'-113/4" x 5'-5 5/4" 8'-O" FROM T.O. F . LOW R LV . CLAD UNIT - EASEMENT PELLA 3565 - CASEME fa x (970) . 920 7822 19" 42" 49Â«-1-9/41 e-mail 8 2'-5 8/4" x 2'-5 5/4" 6'-5" FROM T.O. P AD. M IN A . LVL. CLAP UNIT - FIXED PELLA 2Â¢124- FIXED derek@studlobarchitects.net rifr==ft ~-m# 0 4'-2 9/4" x 41-2 9/4 B'-5" FROM T,O, P NE>, MI IN A . LVL. CLAD MULLED UNIT - (2) FIXED/ (2) MINING PELLA (4)-2525 (2) 2525 FIXED 4 (2) 2525 AMNING: SEE ELEVS -J-N I[ Ill 2 >1 1 1 IL------,--=]U 1 0 2'-6 3/4" x q'-0" ct'-3" FROM T.O. P AD. M IN AD . LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO PRAININe: A-10.1 EFGO CUSTOM-MULLED AIO.1 - EFOO 403 SERIES - ANODIZED ALUM. FIN H Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN d *7~1*JII i di b ~ I 1 q'-3" FROM T.O. P IND. M IN AD .LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO PRAAINS: A-10.1 EFOO CUSTOM-MULLED AIO.1 - EFOO 403 SERIES - ANODIZED ALUM. FIN H COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. F TRIANeLE: AIO.1 BOTTOM OF FRAM Ne RI E J ISTS. GLAD UNIT - FIXED PROFILLIT CUSTOM-CHANNE REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V. I.F.) THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE e 2'-41/4" x 3'-0" 3'-q" FROM T.O. P AD. M IN AP . LVL. CLAD UNIT - FIXED) PELLA CUSTOM eLAZINe TO BE COMPATABLE FV GAS APPLIANG PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 01 1 11 11 1 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF 11.111/-\111 & 1 2 1/ 111./ \\Ill 47-7/ 11 11 H 6'-01' x 6'-111 -1'-3" FROM T.O. P AD. 8 13(SE VL. KAL-MAL PANELINe SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO Alo.1 FOR KAL-INAL LAYOUT THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 1 ~8==L As. 1 1 JA I Ib===11 PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN =14 1 Irp | 44- 1 W_Il x 8'-OIl 8'-3"FROM T.O. P AP. MINA .LVL. KAL-MAL PANELING BYBTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KAL-INAL LAÂ¥OUT COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY 7 214 L.-11 :0 1--* Ll,~~~--\\L_,1-1 J IT-0. x GO" al'-3" FROM T O. P AP. M IN AP . LVL. 1<AL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KAL-MAL LAYOUT RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL i--Â¥= AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, K 2'-5 3/4" x 12'-1 3/4" 15'-3" FROM T.O. P MIP. M IN A D. LVL. GLAD MULLED UNIT - (4) FIXED/ (1) A NING PELLA (5)-2424 (4) 242q FIXED 4 (1) 2Â¢12q A.ANINe: SEE ELEVe COPYRIGHT 2003 ASSEMBLY-CUSTOM ROUeH OPENINGS TO BE V. I. F. L e'-5 3/4" x 2'-13/4' 10'-3" FROM T.O. Ve. M IN A P. LVL. CLAD PULLED UNIT - (5) FIXED PELLA (3)-2525 (8) 2525 FIXED: SEE ELEVATIONS M 4'-O" x 14'-O" SKYLIeHT LOCAT AS I DICA D ON LAN KAL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS Â¢ ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT V. .F. 6' R.O. R.0.11'-P PAN-A 7'-10" x 4'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - FIXED/ AANIN PELLA CUSTOM - MOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V.I.F.) 2 | CUSTOM - MOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-B 5'-5" x 4'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - FIXED/ AANIN PELLA PAN-6 4'-2" x 2'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) EASEMENT PELLA CUSTOM- WOOD REFER TO AID.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) i 1---t=.MOL--b--1 till lilli 1 TRANSLUCENT p-~-Â«-Â»-3 0"EttiLI**41111 PAN-3 5'-IO 3/4" x 5'-6 -7/8" 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA (2)-3565 (2) 9565 MULLED MOOD EASEMENT - SEE ELEVS 11221 PAN-E 2'-2" x 2'-2" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD CUSTOM UNIT - AANING PELLA CUSTOM - MOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V. I.F.) PAN-F 4-9" x 2-10' (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA CUSTOM-MOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-e 8'-6" x 2'-6" SKYLISHT LOCAT AS I DICA D ON LAN KAL-MAL PANELINe SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS 4 ELEVATIONS FOR LAÂ¥OUT V. .F. KAL-MAL TRANSLUDENT PANELING SYSTEM /1 I lip? 1 1 1 3:~ JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 MEST HALLAM STREET DOOR SCHEDULE SYMBOL ROUGH OPENINe HEAD THICKNESS LEAF DIMENSION MANUFACTURER HANDINe MODEL NOTES, 0 01 X H HEIeHT HARPHARE MATERIAL STYLE M X H NUMBER 7'-10' R.O. 5'-3" R.O. OUSTOM: LUMIGITE INTERIOR PIVOT POINT DOOR 24*Â»3 -Ee--7r--Ea 002/A 3'-5" X 7'-1" 1 '-1" PASE,AeE LUMICITE CUSTOMI T.B.P. 3'-4" X 7'-0" T.B.D. RH I""LAJ~ il wul=N 002/3 2'-10" X 7'-I" 7'- 1 " PASSASE MAPLE SOLID) 1 8/4" 2'-8" X 71-(Dll T.B.D. LH OOS/A 20-10" X 7'-1" 7'-1" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 8/4" 2'-B" X 7'-O" T.B.D. LH 005/8 2'-6" X 7'-1" -1'-1 " PASSAGE eLAZINS EURO-eL ST.B.D. T.B.P. RH CUSTOM: EURO eLASS SHOPâ‚¬R POOR 21111=01 1 mill=11=111 005/A 3'-2" X -1'-I" 71-11' SEOURI TY MAPLE SOLID 13/4" 3'-0' X 7'-0" T.B.P. RH CHECK FOR FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS 24" R.O. 101/A 3'-0 8/4" X 7'-1" -1,-111 PASSAGE GLAD FRENCH 17/8" 3'-O" X 61-10" PELLA RH 3682 PELLA CLAD FRENCH DOOR MITH SLAZING 41-2" R.O 102/A 21-10" X 7'-9 7'-3" 4'-61" R.O. -1Ea Eal 1. Ea Ea I PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 9/4" 2'-B" X 7'-O'1 T.B.P. LH Â£ tri-- 102/B 2'-10" X 7'-3" -t'-9" PASSAeE MAPLE SOLID 13/4" 2'-8" X 7'-0" T.B.P. SLIDIN INTERIOR SLIDINe TRACK POOR b 1 11/ / / 11 led La 103/A 2'-8" X 7'-3" 7'-3" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4" 2'-6,1 X 71-011 TB.D. SLIDI POCKET INTERIOR SLIDING POCKET DOOR 01 104/A 2'-10" X -1'-1' 71-111 PASSAeE SLAZINe EURO-eL ST.B.D. 2'-q" X -7'-0" T.B.D. RH CUSTOM: EURO GLASS SHOWER DOOR 41 1[..../ 111...] 106/A 2'-8" X 7'-3" 7'-5" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 13/4' 2'-0" X 7'-O T.B.D. SLIDIN INTERIOR eli PINe TRACK DOOR 106/A q'-0" X 7'-3" 7'-9' SECURITY MAPLE FRENCH T.B.D. (3) 3'-O" X 7'-O" QUANTUM FOLDI 6 TRACK QUANTUM 5 PANEL FRENCH FOLDING TRACK NOTE: ALL EXISTING PAN-ABOPE FLINPORS 110/A q'-o" x B'-3. a'..5. SECURITY MAPLE FRENCH T.B.D. (3) 3'-O" X B'-O" QUANTUM FOLDI 6 TRACK QUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDING TRACK TO BE REPLACED BÂ¥ SIZE AND MULLION LAYOUT AS INDICATED. ALL ROUGH OPENINeS 1 8/A 3'-0 3/4" X 8'-5" 5'-8" SECURITY CLAD FRENCH 17/8" 3'-O" X a'-O. PELLA LH 3eqe EXTERIOR CLAD FRENCH DOOR MITH SLAZINe TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR 4 KINDOM lisa 6'-O" X 7'-8" -7'--9" PASSASE MAPLE SOLID 13/4" (2) 340" X 7'-0" T.B.D. DOUB SLIPINe INTERIOR POUBLE SLIDINe TRACK DOOR MANUFACTURER IN FIELD ~Rev. ~ Construction issue date: Drawin Title WINbow & DOOR /1 1 SPECIAL CONDITION WINDOWS (21 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET SCHEDULE 4112 SCALE: NO REPRESENTATIVE SCALE Sheet #: , m 0 E - 10.1 - I. eouep!setd seeH Xpnr 440" R.0. Thu Jun 12 00:59:05 1Â£... JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONCEPTUAL REVIEW DIRECTORY INDEX March 23rd, 2003 Q.ki.N_E.R.: JUDI- HAAS A.0 COVER SHEET / ~NTACT REFERENCE / FAR CALCULATIONS po box 330 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT aspen, colorado &1612 SURVEY tel qUo .925. 6842 Al.0 VICINITY MAP - 520 pNEST HALL*1 PROPERTY tel (studio) 4-10 .425. 5810 Al.5 PROPOSED SITE AND TOPOeRAPHIC PLAN Fax 410.425.Dacia Al O EXISTINe HISTORIC CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION A2.1 M. LOWER 1 MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED PLANS A2.2 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS & CONTEXT ELEVATION DESIGNERS: ONE FRIDAY DESI6N COLLABORATIVE, LLO. AS.1-3.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS derek m. skalko; principal designer judy haas, project designerÂ· 520 oak lane aspen, colorado 51611 tal 4-70.544.0645 Fax 910.9,20.1822 STRUGTURAL 1 Ll=h r C.Q.N SULTANTS: 1,1 . dll ~ a GENERAL 60-N_J.R ACTOR: 1 1(1 y -- 1-L=l-~ design collaborative, llc. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Skalko naay: Zoning: Re Lot Area: 3000 Sa. FT. 288 Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1,500 50. FT. 1 ! 111,1 lilli L .1 1-11-14 11 1 IL 11 RgifteQ-129 limm * Main Level Oincluded: pan-abode 1,378 FrrTTTFT77TTT~TTTT~7TTT~rrpTT~-TT-4---,-Â·-**ft~~~~~~2~i~~ 4 main level additton) * Lower Level 600' 0.1 percent of loier level (48.6 countable) countable towards FAR) TOTALS 1,426.6 1,426.6 < 1500 - FAR is OK - Notasi A) The loner level (600 sq Et D plal) consÂ»ts of a sq. Footoge 01 â€ž011 area 20' * 30 I q'-6' I depth. The 10-r level als' contoles a 1Ight *811 of 9' x 4'-6~ x 6,V ~1 depth. brigrg thi total Mall wrface craa of the lor,ar le,val to 58-15.5 sc: Fact of surfoca area. Of this total, thes 11,#t -11 crea cr.l b of par""mr area 10-1 the, Str-ucture -11! be e*osed. brrgJ,g Uha a,g,osure percentage to 4155 19. ft. Ihlch counti For 8.1% agoos,/ to be usad agobt FAR- UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT OWNER' S CERTI FI CATE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT -;MI lutcZE %5.'Z #1LIFi;Ws& %;~%0UE A TAMi 8%9 ,!HE RECORD OWNER 69.~~:~#SLaBNBLIN. ~Zin.:puU.ismin,=7Ub tut liD~itoN ExE.Tio.. r CITY CF ASPEN. PITKIN C[RITY. CIR[.ADO LOTS N, 0. & P, BLOCK 42, EXECUTED THIS __ DAY OF ______, 2002. TIE ESTATE OF MAR~RETE A UL CI TY & TO\.NSI TE OF ASPEN, BYâ€¢ PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO -~foi-ar.-Pt/Cia[-MPREMMA,Nt- -arnrUANI-FRIDA~Â£-ACPRCRCATATNE STATE [F COLIRADO ) )SS CCUITY OF PI TKI N ) THE FOREGOING OIlâ‚¬RÂ·S CERTIF]CATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ._- DAY OF CiTATe-,--REAU4~ Z'2TO,1 ul- AS PC=.4 REPRESENTATIVE OF TZ NT=UNK21&=EDOOFFICIAL SEAL )SS COUNTY OF ________) THE FOREGOING OWNERÂ·S CERTIF]CATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS .._ DAY OF N 2002 BY .AR-lE GRANT AS PERS[*-- REPRESENTATIVE CF TIâ‚¬ EETATE-Of MAN~RETE A UIL ~T~INJMWNS!]FFICIAL SEAL. 0 .. SET NOTARY PUBLIC ALZEP Â·tock Lf VICINITY MAP (2107. .1 F SCALE TI TLE CERTI FI CATE . 1 INCH - 10 FEET THE UNDERSIGNED, A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTAT[VE Of STEWART TITLE OF ASPE,L INC PLAT NOTES .a REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY CO-ORAD[1 DOES HEREBY CERTIFY T*T 32 ~HO~[ILISTEDONP~LEWEcdhFiti,M ~AuG~'W M.ir~~UN s~AI TIE PERS[Â»IS LISTED AS OWNERS ON THIS PLAT DO HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO T}â‚¬ WITHIN 55'u:r=121,-*I.Wt/6-'57Mr#6-%4:-:trnce -th . S I.L. -W. 0 S 10 15 20 1 - -971,t - ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE. THIS CERTIFICATE IS hOT TO BE CONSTRLED AS AN ABSTRACT C-â€¢ssion Re,/utiorâ€¢ 1,U-â€¢ber 32 (Ser-" 0/ 2002). an' t" Subâ‚¬*va/. Exemption ~ ~ ~ 4 3 I~, Â£I . OF TITLE, fOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE. AND IT IS LIDERSTOOD Arâ€žMint ricor-01 -th t- PitkIn Co-ty airrk and *corÂ·cl,rÂ· 0, Receptkn LOT AND AGREED THAT STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN. INC. NEITHER ASSUIâ‚¬S NOR WILL BE CHARGED ?fEEâ„¢9Â·5:2Â£%9513976*Â£4Â£.DZERT SET C[Â»2 WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY W}MTS[*EVER ON ANY STATEMENT CONTAINED HERE]I t- land as covirants A-*-W thi su,0. i â€¢e 7. . TITLE 2.?Th, 3.000 ic,-re foot tel (Lot P, 11 -titt- to 1.500 1,-r, 4.t orÂ· FAR Floor ..â€ž. ' C#45 ITE~~f-11Â¥[t-of ASPEN. iNC. -d th, 6.000 squar, foot lot (Lot M end 0) 1, /r,titl/ to 3.000 -CD-r, f/t oF FAR / ED CAP 620 2. +OPKINS AVE. Floor aree . I. -. ASPEN. COLORAD[] 81611 STATE Cy COLORADO EWEa'&*EE2â‚¬5Â¥251Â£30836 .i CLEC & CO- " i EASDENT 6, 4 COUNTY OF PIXTIN ) * 324 PG 828 THE F[REGOING T]TLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 4.7No F--ther Iuick.1/0, oF th, 10,- *t,d -//an *ill O/ per//tt// no/ i lOT N iD~ OF ----- _.2002 BY ________-__-_ Is _________ OF-sTE-V-*T 0/0/tkonot /.,tung -Its /0/ 'flt. ur-/$ appllcabl, Op,rovels or, ret"/Id 'I/â€¢Suar,t TITLE or-KAOL.-TAC -- to thE Al,1/1, Lind 8, Co,1, A ,F/,Ct ot tli lal of oppilcitlia j VITNESS MY HANBAND SFICIAL SEAL. Â· MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, 5-'Alt -1 W./0â„¢.ent c./ th, c-/Ictil gropirtlis -Al "A/or- to th, 91"10,2/ / reâ‚¬,.IrÂ·~-r,ts 0Â¢' the R--6 zori *Itret. mth the exceptlor or tri varinces opproweol by 1- HFC 1/7/0/ Resolutkn No. 32. S//*1 Â¤F 2002. Not.ithiti/,I//9 th~ For/goll. ar, / 0-lcont for r'/~ ellvelocr-rt 09 the suÂ»Ject lots F, Inta- th, râ€¢Ghts afforcird --r the Larl th, Code to rec,wlt vorn,M:,5 FroM the oliner,stor,cl rei"r/Merts of the jf 2-/ -trit FroM an -/ty -th th, authority to hear and -cld, uper, 1,â€¢ch r,c,-*ts. 61â€¢stor< Preserv,t~ CenÂ·W'se, Resc*utk,n *-*,er 32. Seres of 2002. effect~ty ~ F LOT P approve# 0 300) sq.,ar, Foot FAR bc*us (,triody riftict- I th, FIR tilts P / 4 ntablisheel â€¢-~Â»r r~,te Â·2.~ above). a r .,st sâ€¢â€ž yor,0 -tmack voriaâ€¢â€¢: For th, ~. LOT N ~~D O Â£07 ' s * Vt:tcre. 0 7 vit -11 yerd setback veriance ard 6 4 rear- yer# setbock vorine Â£(r 3.000 SO/T.â€¢/- SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE a shed thet 16 tocat" ator, the allry, 5Â· r- .yord s, tback var,arr,s For 1,0 oth- 22 & 11 ;h,/1 that or, locatid along th, all~y ar~ 0 4 -:st -, yard sitback vcrk-ci For the 00689 'CRES â€¢/- Ast,rrâ€¢~st of th/1/ sh-h, 9 2- ,/st Iide yard -tback virinc, for th, Per, Abodl. --- y k ~IVl~WAIN&%~S~D~~TMY DIINCTTDI- ~R~SI~ ~' HEREON DESCRIBED arâ€¢01 â€¢ 23' ccel,-1 6- yarol wt:ick --cr~:i fr Â·t- Pan Abool~. 2 pRI THE LOCATIN AND D]MENSIONS OF T>â‚¬ BOLNDARY LINES, BUILDING ENVEL[PES, 7.10~-- and fut.re o~ners of th, Pen Abod, itructur, locat/d on Lot P. mock 42. Oty 6.000 SUFT./- i 2# UTILITIES. ]â€¢PROVEIâ‚¬NTS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN [I T}â‚¬ PITKIN COVITY TITLE. INC Ind To-Iite of A,p-, -1 not Ipply For e bU-,g p,-t to Ii,oush 1- itructuri ' TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER N PCT-170862. DATED MAY 20, 2002 ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THIS MAP. - at any t". an 'Trlt reached - recovâ€¢Itkor, OF Ckit not speclflotly b /*cherâ€¢oe 01377 ACRES i/- 1, THE CENTR[1 SURVEY PRECISM IS GREATER THAN 1:10.000 wITH AN ACCURACY TO 0001 For) 1Â·FCÂ·s *piroval of 0 500 ~c,Ar, Foot noor cri bonus as part of thls lot split OF AN Aget AND TWT TIE SLRVEY WAS Dorâ‚¬ IN ACCENDANCE WITH CRS 1973 TITLE 38. 2 3 ARTICLE 51 AS A,ENDED /12[,1 TIIâ‚¬ TO TIIâ‚¬ E/FNE= &9#Mid= :*=62'.el=, i Â£Â£" p S]GIED THIS _ DAY OF ........... 2002 i . 9. Withâ€¢â€¢ t-Â·ty CO) *,1 of th, /Aormtion of th) plit. the oppllcant shall obtoe 2 0â€¢916-9 -,Emar,ts- igrig F ro- th, OtÂ¥ Engâ€¢w,râ€¢,g Diport-nt encroacbÂ·~nt tk:in,i, Fir thi -viral -crooch-nts ASPEN SURVEY ENGDâ‚¬ERS. INC D,to th, Fwgit RAW. Ctu sheds. th, f,rx,. arl a-,plt,r) ASPEN. CO 8]611 , 210 1 GALINA ST. 1 91 CITY EUENT 1 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 727 ! rli LOT Q m[$27':TcL.Rf ~,2,2:?c.k#2:12(rhN ~firÂ¤irNITJ" XM %:&'E~ED AND APPROVED BY i MiHircit.li"IliNW'~ 21&2&,itiMESTM g ............ -1. 112 .. i Sleâ‚¬D THIS .._ MY M _---_. 2002 - VI 4. â€¢TlEST: i 4 Acce:-2[*REMOD-War------- KATHPR-rklri.-Crff-CCriw----- \ i YEL Cll i ./ LEGEND & NOTES 9,04 .1 f ..U CI TY ENGI NEER' S APPROVAL 4 1 THIS PLAT I THE Ut HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY K- TIâ‚¬ CITY ENGINEER Or T}â‚¬ CITY [r ASPEN. THIS .-_. DAY [F ....-____.___. 2002. I. 1 FOUND SUR,47 â€¢OIUMENT REBIR M TH CAP AS NOTED lâ€¢ . ciff EetfiE-NIC-k -A-~I--------------------- SPI KE OR P-K NA L SURVY CDITR[1 4 01 - 11â€¢V POSTED ADDRESS IS 304 AND 320 6â‚¬ST HALAM ST. - . craw TILE INFORMATION WAS FLRNISHED BY, STEWART TITLE OF- ASPEN. INC. e,0.00Â·, ... COMMITIENT NO 00030505 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL DATED SEPT. 19. 2002 SET CM. THIS PLAT OF TIâ‚¬ Ul. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBD[VISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY T}â‚¬ DIRECTOR OF- TIE CEÂ»IMUNITY DEVELCF,ENT DEPARTMENT OF TIE CITY OF- ASPEN Ch 1 THIS ..... DAY OF -_._._-____. 2002. O SET CORNER â€¢C 4 REBAR WRED CAP CIP 16129 -IC.V.. - 4 00-00) SEE SIâ‚¬ET 2 FOR ALL Sur/EY FIELD 1â‚¬ASLRECITS . CTTW~ 74 RED IN Dnemi.-ICK-Al*â‚¬-GDOM----------- Câ€¢c c=i7Â»-- CLERK AND RECORDER' S ACCEPTANCE 3 ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OF-rICE OF TIâ‚¬ CLERK AND REC[*DER OF PITKIN COUNTY, I .-4 BOOK ..... AY-BAGE __._~... AS RECEPT~ NUMBER _______.________... WEST COLORADO AT OCLOCK _21 ON THIS . 2002 IN PLAT .-2------- ~ Â£Â£.4~f ECEIR-~3-ECOADEr-ill-Vll-ballk------------------ 9,80 1 STREET PREPARED Bl INDEX ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCLED! 1,6 To COU-/0 .... MIST COMUJ,KE .......... 21 0 1 GALINA STREET â€¢ IASED L,01 -r ./.T [M THIS ..1 .THIN T,2Â£Â£ YEARS â€¢FTER .. SHEET 1 SITE PLAN. CERTIFICATES & MOTES. VICINITY 114/ ASPEN. COLC 01611 F I RST DISCXXRED SUCH ./[CL IN . E'iâ‚¬,fr. M,Y ANY ACU[,1 -SID SHEET 2 11â€¢ROVEMENT SURVEY. EXISTING CDâ€¢DITICÂ»4S LFCÂ», ANÂ¥ DUECT I â€¢ T,4 S PLAr . COD,â‚¬NCED IEL*Â£ TI- 704 YEARS .0â‚¬ /FAX ( 970) 925-3816 '122. T. ./. I. T./ CrJUI 'I CA' C. SOW, Iâ‚¬RED, E-MAIL dav,easp-nfocon SHEET 1 OF 2 Job na 32155' JUNE 7. 2002 ~ , 0/VISED /2-03-02 ' Â®0 UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT N SCALE SET ALLEY n ./. N 1 ] NCH â€¢ 10 FEET - NLOCK 0 5 10 15 20 . 04'".- 2 40 lili --- --111-EN]*':t,91, Ai LOT H .4[1 .ij 1 - : - /41= 1 '2 0 5 i - - A 1 i i ELEC. CO- i CASEIENT g. I. * 32â€¢ PO 829 LOT N f / !1 i .j I i Ve -/ i i PATIO LOT Ch@, i O i 020# I i LEGEND & NOTES 12 i / O F[1,10 SUbâ‚¬Y IOUINT REMA W TH CAP AS 1Â«]TED 2 "CÂ»' / 4. e Fl KE 02 P-K NAIL Sl*r.â‚¬Y CONTR[1 1 477 P POSTED ADDRESS TS Â·304 AND 320 IST MILLAM ST.- 09* / L+F~ is -8- %00]D r[NCE f h , -- WRE FENCE 44 -6913 Ek kÂ¥ O UTILITY BOX it 22 *b Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER Cm OUENT ; 4 12 6 .4- / - . , SET C[*21Â£2 16 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 . 407 18.-n 1 Q ~ ~ Â·~ 1~ TITLE DIFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY, PITKIN COKINTY TITLE. INC. "T, i CoI,11[TIâ‚¬,~T~B %~172061~02 -1/. I .. 8299*42 - 4 . 42.Â· 1-~ .. 1. / ~0 CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED 1 STORY VOOD . ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED m CAP 1 / - -0 l. g.#301!N.64:~ RECORD FRI nâ‚¬ 1939 PriCM. - OF TIâ‚¬ Pllâ‚¬ i *. i i i W. - 1 - I 0 -U A I 4 g**0 â€¢ 41 il â‚¬N loc . ~ ~ar SET - n. .C â€¢ED t- I GIC Wid STEN ... COâ‚¬ Clm g GUTTER IMPROVEMENT SURVEY . C,Â¥0=: 330. l'EST ..Ul= 40Â£44~r PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO LOTS N, 0. & P, BLOCK 42, CI TY & TOUNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACURD' 16 10 CCM..[*ADO LAV ....T .... ANT LEGAL ACTI Câ€¢ 210 i GALINA STREET 0 1â€¢SED -01 -~ IFECT IN â„¢11 PLAT WTHIN TI~EE VE-S AFYER Â¥â„¢ ~ ASPEN. C[1.0 81 61 1 FIRST DISCOâ€¢TRED SIO, 10-ECT. 1 i ,Â«] EÂ·,â‚¬19,0 1,tr AN, Acll [Â»1 1.ISE-D IFCÂ»l .ANÂ¥ CEJECT I N ng S PLAT BE C{Â»0â‚¬0 1,02[ TI- TOI ~Â·EARS P'Oâ‚¬/FAX ( 9701 925-3816 E--MAIL dovelispe'l"Fori ~ FROI ./ .TE .. .. CER. FICATIED! DO.0 1{REDâ€¢ Job na 321 55 le< 25.2002 SHEET 2 OF 2 I . - --I . e UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT Fu A - SCALE 9â€¢m SE, ALLEY BLOCK 2 1 INCH = 10 FEET - V. .T B ... 0 5 10 :5 20 W. . 203,1/ 40. P- 6*22 .. LOt N i. S.]04#r# .i - . m f j f 0 1 .., 1 1 1 4 -1 1 ---1- 3 W - Ii----- Pk' 40 i PANO LOT ! - 12 l 2 LEGEND & NOTES i :il:; D f O FOXÂ»â€¢I] S~nâ‚¬Y IOUENT REBAR M TH CAP AS ITED e ~,apy 4 t. / /9..1 G SPI ICE CÂ»2 P-K -1 L SUR,â‚¬Y CÂ»*TROL VICTWIAN 402 &-4.E 1 h =*36.@g i POSTED ADDRESS I S -30â€¢ ANB 320 EST MILLIN ST. ~ -8- 200 FENCE / -11- 4 RE FENCE :~g; 968) O UTILITY BOX , Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORIER i SET CCRIER NO 4 REBAR WITH RED CIP 16129 11-8-02 92' i LOT Q qa-- 19 f AS'S /.'/b - Ip zi Â· 'â€¢ ~ Â· DATED Uâ‚¬ 27.2002 TITLE D~ORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYâ€¢ PITKIN COLITY TITLE. INC CO-[TMENT NO PCT-170861 8199*.Â£*ABDIi; 4, 4. i . / ~~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED t.. ...... : . 9 i i j.9. 1 : ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIF'ER SIZE AS NOTED 1.- 1 CALLS IN ( ) ARE RECORD FACI THE 1959 [FFICAL MIP OF T}â‚¬ â€¢~ ' CITY M Aspot . 1 I. 1 0 WU . 1 59.99. i . 41& 2. ,â‚¬4Â£ A.E.3t 114( i . (9200, (60- . 14 i -,1 ' .C <I OP ........ S.I. ... - S'.1 -U z LOTS N. 0. & P. BLOCK 42. I MPROVEMENT SURVEY VVE 8 1 ..U K BALLA~ CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN. STREET PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACC~DI. 7/ CE*.O2AOO .... ..T [c,10â‚¬E Al. LEGAL ACTIC' 210 1 GALINA STREET mISED IFCÂ»â€¢ ANÂ¥ DEFECT I N THI S PLAT M mi N Tlf.E ,Â·[ARS AFTEA VOU ASPEN. Cal-0- 81611 rl AST DISCOnâ‚¬RCD SUCH DUCCT IN Z Eym. MÂ¥ -r ACTIED, 1â€¢SED L,9, ANY DEFECT I N T,4 $ PLAT . CD,EJ,CE, ,-E D- TO, rEARS E-MAIL *lveeasperâ€¢nfocon P}Oâ‚¬ GAX < 970} 925-381 6 .... n. DATE I. 11/ CO~FICATIC' S.I. 10*Â£Â£/ SHEET 2 OF 2 job na 32155 1/. 25, 2002 I ' /0 I . I . t4 Thismap/drawing/Image lia graphical representation of the featuies depicted and is nci alegal ie les .89Â§= 4 ~ ~ depending on the entargement or red ~ction. ~pyright 2003 City of Aspen/Pitkin C ourly 19. Z Z 0 0 0 -4 : 9...1.b 73 00 W FRANCIS ST f2Â§2&224Â·~ ' S G LE<f'/$*C ' 1 "*B.~1 I - PhsÂ©94+2 Â¥49Â»%:M: - 1- - W HALLAM ST & : 10'$*%li ~>, ''fÂ» 22*4 - $ 1 42.''B %Â®REÂ©.. 3%5 Â» i E mill Flle'liHI o ~ Judy Haas Residence 320 Hallam Street -86: e I City of Aspen - West End 106%,i:35|| t| 3 k0 2: . LM 3%*!IN:!11 : I== .. THE INF 31N 393Md3H 3-TVOS ON ~ 31Â¥09 9 133hllS INV11VH 1S3M ZE : NIDIA N THIRD ST 8 WyllyH derek@itud oharchite t design collaborative,llc. f r 459> J ROOF'Â»C /43095 F-------------------------------------------1 design collaborative,llc. 1 t. 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309.0695 'D ~ ~ ..mall fax (970) .920.7822 KITCHEN ~7-WATH BEDROOM y: dereke,tudiobarchiteels.net W 0 1 1 -- --------- -- 1--4 r-Tr---- Â° -----~ ~~ Â· O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1/fl THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT COLLABORATME LLC. CONTAINED ON THS DOCUMENT IS THE 1 1 PROPERTY OF ONE FFUDAY DESIGN THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED oR E- - -~~~------------------ -- EE==E-"- *3 COLLABORATME L.L.C. NO PART OF COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIORWRITTEN - PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN DESIGN COLLASORAIVE LLC. SHALL 1 IND All Oâ„¢ER REIRIED IGHTS. L'21228 2Z1e 1 1 ------------------- --- 1 1 1 COUABORATME L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY LE - RETAIN ALL COAMON LAW STATUTORY COPYRIGHT 2003 Eq------. 1 1 1 L-_-____-_-_________________________________J I.OFU% ./0& /1 3 EXISTING PLAN - PANABODE (33 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) (-5-3 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION ~4:~3, SCALE: 1/4.= 1.-01 ~A-HI~ SCALE : 1/4Â· = 100Â· NORTH ~0~0.- 11 1 11 I - -1 AFFEfrl HIEIVIFI|~7|IFEIBEEÂ»EE I.Or'lle .80/E 1-11 1 C./auction is- date Dr-nr Title: EXISTING CONDITIONS c23 EXISTING ROOF PLAN - PANABODE ....1 ..........1- (43 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) <63 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION H UM ~A.H|t~ SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0Â» ISSEALE.1/4'.17 \~~j/' SCALE: 1/4Â·= 1'-o" Sheet' A-HIS eouep!Seh~ seeH Xpnr leells lueiIBH OZE puE! 19eM - uedsÂ¥ Jo 40 14==2 t ff 1 3% a d i ,0253> 1 1 1 1 -- des gn collaborative, llc. 320 oak la n e 7 r7..............4 1 1 1 F'------- ''~~h aspen colorado 81611 I =m----~<,- Â· fax (970.920. 7822 C ---1, phone(970). 309. 0695 |~~~R 4 7 = 10' 6 1'2~ / .-mall r- . 1 \ r--- MECHANICAL \ ' 1-. i derik@studiobarchlt' ct..net :1/ . 18 - .11. l 1 1 1 1 W Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. L- â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN I,n-ENT C~-i-- C CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE ; BEDROOM I _egiL Â· Â·2. , PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN Lj /es- COLLAaORATIVE LLC, NO PART OF 1 91 THIS INFORMAnON MAY BE USED OR ~~~~~ COPIED WITHOUTTHEPRIORWRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN4 COUABORATIVE LLC. ONE FIDAY ----- DESIGN COUABORATWE LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY TIL~V A* T.y EffEE # AND AltÂ· OTHER RESERVED.GHTs, 1 COPYRIGHT 2%3 2.- - - 1 F------------1 Ill - BATH CLOSET ~.' MECHANICAL 1 -68 .. i - -4 ~_--=20 L 1 - - 41 tri 1 1 11 U ......g....*...I li 11 11 L..CE, 1 1 it 1 1 1 2-, 4, 4 , KE' 41, /1 3 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN ~ ~ SCALE : 1/r = 1,-0. NORTH f (f) % 7 1 1 f , 1 1 1 1 i Â»1 9-99Â« 1 GEÂ» -- C Â·Â·r.2 1 - i. -rag- 1-~K 111// --11 /7 1 01 b- -7 1 011/041-I 7r -11 1-= 7 rifi ; T k_-IlL--IL-Nd_9Lj ... .. U =4/6=1 LIVINe AREA U 11[ D-1 M \ // \\ - .4 1 i - I E KITCHEN 1 6 1, 63 0 0%1% â‚¬Â» -- E- 1. 0 917-9.j --2-Â«10 Gol Et 01 -1/ ,-2\ r------1-4.2.7.r.----- 4-- [83-7 G M . 100 - 11 . -1000 .1 111!22 1 :1 11.-.- 1 1 1 1 - 1 51 f 11 1/.-1 /J SATHERING AREA ~-- I A â‚¬" Alpo<,-0 --- = -- ./I 68....LJ I 1 L-, 4 1 1 d w ~1. -- - -1 '112.8EgA 1 ' - - --1 IN L 11 -- = i M j |i I DINING AREA 13 61 BRID6E 11 Â»=L \ 11 4 r,As,4 1 0- REP t| r-m~-nr--r--1 L-1 , -ir Â· -r ' =-I Â«.1 3 1 -1 i r--1..UL.-_LL-_L-i..4 --A _ :Â·, Rev. Con,/,Ucion 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 R287ED PLANS 329 HAUAM WREET - (3, Sheet I (23 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN - 0 ~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'40 eouepisekl seeH Xpnr lee#S UlelleH OZE pu3 1SeM - uedsv Jo 4!0 6 f 14.1 t 11 f~f ~ f f a .r 11 y 11 -2- 1 1 1 LI==lcD/- design collaborative,llc. 320 oak lane (rÂ» - - ~ Lit-Li'â„¢11 ' - - aspen colorado 81611 ~ phon,(970).309.0695 f a x (970) . 920. 7822 1 1 der,k@~tudlobarolilteGI'.nat expos= ./. O I libil 81 Il i GEDAR â€¢~AMII- - LEXAN â„¢ANSUUSENT 11 dill 411111 CNE9. ./. O 2003 ONE FR10),I DESIGN | | | | ILIZIWIE LLC. -1- 11 1 111 I 111 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN NTENT CONrAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS â„¢E 111111 -- I E~ PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.LC. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR 1 1 11 lilli 1 lilli 11 1 1 lili lil PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIORWRITTEN Câ‚¬DAR *'.US COLLABORAmâ‚¬ LLC. ONE FRIDAY RIDGE VENT DESIGN COLLABORAIVE LLC. SHALL ICAL SK I RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 ,-7 1 1 1 r. E . ~ 121 1 1 | 11 1 1 C ' LU 1 2, 6, (3, 4 . 2- . --:-- / 1/ EE / 1 3 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE : 1/4- = 1'4 1 11 11 LI - U 1 11 1 M 21.131.11]1.151.titi.% Â£ 50 3 IM."10101@ElÂ»1011 P..1 1 bl /1 ----u-*6-1-'Qifij 11 O-,0 -nk PROPOSED ROOF PUN ONT V sl-tâ€¢ -PROPOSED-CONIEXLELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET A-2.2 SCALE: 3/16Â»=1'-0" 7 eouepise H nr 320 Hallam Str M - uedsy Jo *1!0 f r i f Â»f d t design collaborative, llc. __ ---- _ ----AT'QoiStL.'88Ii-1,GILIO,I 320 oak lane 7 EL_EV. 120Â·-0- 2 7/. RIOSE 85Â»1 aspen colorado 81611 Â¥ ELEV. lieÂ·-1. phone (970). 309. 0695 ULL] L[1.11 U N 11.1111 fax (970).920.7822 -==19[mi ..mill der,k@.tudlobarchltects.nut LU-11-Il UU N UU 11 U ll 11 111111 lili ll lili ll Illi ll lili ll lili 11 11 i iI 11 Callill 1111-11 Ul]31 -[JIFEUIT-T[TEFUT[T-ErT7FFTmnrmuTnnm~M lili Il Il ll lin-UrrfrrfanTÂ»[TrirmrErfEUTITProrrrFEr~Grov-Erl O 2003 ONE FR10AY DESIGN 1 COLLAeORATIVE LLC. [ 11 [ILIli Ill] 11 Ill ill lili 11 lilli 111 THE INFORMATION AND OES[GN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMIENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN & T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE COL.[~ORATVE LL.C. NO PAR:T OF 7 ELEVÂ· HO'-3Â» â„¢IS INFORMATION MAISIE USED OR -TO. PLATE PINING al/'P-OUT COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN I ELEV. log'-3- PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN '11 1: .1 ' .1 i 111 ' :1Â¢; i 11.1,1 91: 11 -1.11 F-[~-~--~1--LTE -PLATE BRSPIE LOM COLLABORATIVE L.LC. O,2 FRIDAY 7 ELEV. 108Â·-0- DESIGN COUABORATTIE LLC. SHALL 1=0=7Â«024~~ ~1 RETAINALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL Oâ„¢ER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 %1111 13- 11 lili 1:1:lili)1!111 ,~iM:,~~#*w--- - 6752"EL 11 11 /1 3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION - ADDITION '' SEEIEE' 8 SCALE : 1/4- = 17 11 _-la==1 ~ C 11 11 11 11 11 11 . & TO. cae torâ‚¬R LEVEL (D 'r ELEV. 8.L,1. Q- E I T 4 1 1 1 1 I TO. KAL-rIAL SKYLIGHT r eLEV. 120'-O' b TO RICÂ»E BEAM ~ r ELEV. Ill'-1- - f ELEV. 116'-8 1/2' 1 1 Ell G ' 111' IIi i 'li , 111.11 :11 1 1 I. I Ttim 111 11 lilli lilli 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 * TO. PLATE MAIN *ABLEE ELEV 110-3 lili 1 11~11'l'11:1~lill 1,~11 1 ,1,1 11 1~11111111,1 ~ 1 1 1 lili '11 1 51-I lit 1 i TO. PLATE MIC,/E HIGH f ELEV JOB'-O 3/4' 1|P|~ v '1 1, , 1 Â·,11 ,: 'Â· ~ EE ~,0 0, ~ ~ ~ ~_~ 1-7U-1 1/ \1 1 / 1 / 0N 0 \ - â€ž --+ -- 1 T.O. PLre MAIN LEVEL,/ ORIDIE 2 ELEV. 100'-O- rKEEE-------rt----------ri----------------11 1 1,= 11 1 1111 /111 11==1111 1 1111 // 111 111 \ 111 1 1 ! 4 lilli, 111 \lili ~ ~ Ill\. 111 1 //1 1 k 111 \ 111 , 1111 1 111-1 1 1116==â„¢11 11,2=dll 1 ~ 1 Cori*uction l TD. GONG. LI#HTIVSLL EASE 1-ue dete 1EGN ELEVAIONS L________--L--___________________________1 -ELEV 81 -1 HA STR T Sheet # /2-1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 SCALE : 1/4Â· = 1-0 Ann Weils u.lelieH OZE ple jseAA - uedsV Jo *1!0 f t , PROPOSE TO AP[2 5,CrLIGHT TO ROOF~ PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FUE / TO KAL-+NAL SK/LIGHT PROPOSE TO REM/LE EXISTINIS ROOF= t-il--1 ~< design collaborative, llc. - A T.O. R,0613 BEEAM 7 ELEV. 118Â·-1Â· PROPOSE TO IAPROVE EXISTINe FASCIA 1 TO. FLATE PORCH CUTS"K r ELEV. 116'-8 1/ 320 oak lane 12 aspen colorado 81611 107 1 I - phone (970).309. 0695 PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXIST//3 MI~[X*,1 f a * (970) . 920. 7822 LOCLATION &212 SIZIND ITH UDGRADED ....11 CLAD OR MOOD .NOOP,5 5Â·r HA*=ACTLEER derâ€¢ke,tudlob,ichltect..net TO BEE [PETERMihED MUJON F'ATTERN TO MATCH EXISn,16 CONDITIONS i T O PLATE MAIN *ADLE - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTING STAIRS O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COUABORATIVE L.L.C. _ _ ~ING 81Â».1/-OVT â€¢11â„¢ MORE APPROPRIATE HISTORIC SOLUTION â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN WITENT CONTAINED ON TIS DOCUMENT IS THE COUABORATIVE LLC. NO PART OF PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUTTHEPRIORWRITTEN Â£33 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALL.AM ST. FACADE COLLABORATNE LLC. ONE FRIDAY PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY OEESIGN \Â·23/ SCALE . 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· DESIGN COLLABORAIVE LLC. SHALL- RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY Am All OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYFUGHT 2003 7 ELEV. 100-/' - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FLIE 51--------Er-=61-3--------------17 ~ 1 5+ It 1 1 11 1 ~ PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTING ROOF 1 | |1 PROPOSE TO MWOE EXISTINS FASCIA 1 11 L--L-~44 It EN=Mmy*iuiu~ulu=u=ulLu=i=LkluJ 1 1 11 11 11 1 TO. CONG. LIGHTyâ‚¬LL- BAE Tl 1 11.91.11 HEd ~ 1 Il r---------M-.-..-111 / IIi --s PROPOSE TO MNITAIN BOSn,6 MAOBI (DC LOCATION AND SIZINS /â€¢TH LPGRNED CLAD OR ~10057 .00~45 El MAIFIC.11EER 0_LU LE-==Z=ZIZZ--=-------_===_-5 - -- 1 T.O. CONG. LOrER LEVEL Ntt-Ill 1 TO [32 DETERMIPâ‚¬/ AU_LION PATTERN TO C a) ~-' 7 ELEVÂ· M'-4' MATCH EXISTINe CC*OITIONS 0 a) CO CD PROPOSE TO REPINISH PANÂ«a<XE STAIN 3&R 211-PROPOSED.VVEST_ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION 05 E ' SCALE : 1/4- = 1'-0" co E i (O -3 0- 243 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE 2 r.2 SCALE: 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· . r p -- MkPOSE TO 12Â·OVE EXSIMS C~) Â¥mâ‚¬;0,4 M 4 0 AM) CONMECT PAH-ABODE TO hEM ADDITION i TO. KAL-AL- SKYLIGHT 1 -00:ZIL- pill , MJTH 7'-0' ONTERIOR DIMENSION AT LOM SIDE) Â¥-mev. 120'-cÂ· 94~ | CaliCTION neâ€¢Em. Cole,ECTOR PIECE TO TIE IÂ»i INTO EXIST,/46 PAN-ABOOE ROOF CON/TION (LE 7 ELEV. lieÂ·-1 ~_,~~kcl--~r===w=~=Â·----237Â·~~==~--_1 TO BUIL-Plle COOEE 1â‚¬16HT MIMMS â€¢ FOR LEAST A,eÂ»rr OFF nÂ·PACT TO psÂ©ne LE aRLOP 1 1 L--.Bmitrll' L U 1,4 1/.T- 410~â€¢â€¢ 1 CONDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTLEE IF LOIâ‚¬RED 1 12 107 rn-t i 14 -ll * t-Â·-fÂ¥n,al Ree,E EBSTIND ELECTRIGAL 80/3 4 %1525 TO MORE ASIFTICÂ·ILLÂ¥ COES,RABLE LOCÂ·ATION REPLACE EXIST11*3 /0,Â·1 /TH LARGER r,INDOM STYLE OF INDOM TO REMAIN CONSISTENT VIâ„¢ ALL INDOVE TO BEE REPLACED Ril - 1 EGI#HI[IZEII[~ i T.O. PLATE MAIN SIBLE 'El.EV. 110'-3. I ELEV- 1014-3. -7 1 A Ta PLATEE BRIDGE HIGH 7 ELEV. 108'-8 9/4' | I TO. PLATE BRIDGE LOI T a.5/. 102Â·-O- 251PROPOSED-EABLELEMATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACADE SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-0' & TO. FUâ€¢Â©. MAIN LEVE11 88//E 7 ELEV. 100'-O. -~EC~ PROF'OBE TO ADD 51<Â·fl.16HT TO ROOF i I ri--------------- ---------17 PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINS FLUE 11 -1 ~ PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTÂ»kS ROOF= 11 11 11 11 It 1 , I ...Mâ€ž C...... LL=-3 IH:~9/:.#.' 11- _ I TO CONG. LIGHTPELL BASE ~ PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINS /)00,11 1~lued-: r ELEV. 41'40' LOCATION ANC) SIZING ITH 1.PGRADED - 11 ~ED#~N ELEVATIONS L_===_=====Crzz---rrizzz-JJ --waxuwm FA~IZE=====IRZE=~~IL- 7.U.. TO DE PETERMINED Taty. 62'4Â· El~ PROPOSE TO I.-SH PAN-Ae/[PE.l, N Sheet # f21 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION --I A-3.2 SCALE : 1/4- = 1'-0Â· &61PROPOSED_SQUIH_ELEVATION PAN-ABODE ADD 1 SCALE : 1/4- = 1'-0- t JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONCEPTUAL REVIEW DIRECTORY INDEX March 23rd, 2003 2.Â£112_R: JUDI' HAAS A.0 COVER SHEET / CONTACT REFERENCE / FAR CALCULATIONS po box 330 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT aspen, colorado 81612 SURVEY tel q-10 .425.6848 Al.0 VICINITY' MAP - 320 PIEST HALLAM PROPERTr tel (studio) 6170 .6125. 6840 Al.5 PROPOSED SITE AND TOPOeRAPHIC PLAN fax 470325.8840 A2.0 EXISTINe HISTORIC CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION A2.1 LOHER 4 MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED PLANS A2.2 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS Â¢ CONTEXT ELEVATION DESIGNERS: ONE FRIDAY DESIeN COLLABORATIVE, LLC. AB.1-5.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS derek m. skalko; principal designer judy haas; project designer 320 oak lane aspen, colorado 8161 tel 470.544.0645 Fax 470.420.7822 I â‚¬ ./ STRUCTURAL 72 - 4 CONSULTANTS: r ii d GENERAL CONTRACTOR: hes-I'' design collaborative,llc. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS skalko . ha a s Zoning: RE Lot Area: 3000 50. FT. FAR 1 Di 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1,500 Sa. FT. nut'-dT'h~ lilli lilli Illill Illill Illbil Illill I lili Il-Illl--Frfr-rTrrf-rTETTENTrrUTOF-TTTI eross Area (sf) Item l j I 11111111111111111111111111LU U O_LIULL11111] * Main Level (Included: pan-abode 1,576 It 1 1 11 4 main level addition) ~~' ~ -21-(-f 111*11'll CILLm $-A l I ~ 11 * Lower Level 6OQ A (8.1 percent of lower leve (48.6 countable) 8 1Â·, f I 11 11 countable towards FAR) 114 1 1 ~..Id' 1 441111 tic:.4 TOTALS 4426.6 1 4 1 1,426.6 < 000 - FAR le OK ----------*------------------------------------- ------------------------------- - 'Li~' lili 1.11 1 : 1' 1 ~ |1| Il ||| 1 8 G ..1-_. Notes: A) The lower level (600 sq ft In plan) consists of a sq. footage of wall area 20' x 50' x q'-6" In depth. The lower level also contains a light well of 3' x q'-6" x 6'6" tri depth, bringing the total wall surface area of the lower level to 5,575.5 eq feet of surface area. Of this total, the light well area and 6" of perimeter area around the structure will be exposed, bringing the exposure percentage to 475.5 sq. ft., which counts for 8.1% exposure to be used against FAR. . Il./L//&... I. & ~ Sun Mar 23 11 41 40 2003 / -UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT U \WNER' S CERTI FI CATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ESTATE OF MARGARETE A, UHL BEING THE RECORD OWNER OF LOTS N, 0, AND P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT COLORADO DOES HEREBY SUBDIVIDE AND REPLAT THIS REAL PROPERTY UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF LOT N AND O, AND LOT P UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, EXECUTED THIS __ DAY OF ______, 2002. LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL CITY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, BYi BY: PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ANTON UHL, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE JULIE GRANT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF COLORADO ) >SS (30.00 COUNTY OF PI TKI N ) THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF , 2002 BY ANTON UHL AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF _________) NOTARY PUBLIC >SS COUNTY OF ________) THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF --- , 2002 BY JULIE GRANT AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE Â£57*TE-OP MA*GARETE A. UHL. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, ED GRVL ALLEY NOTARY PUBLIC LJ SET COR X VICINITY MAP WDÂ« 14 0 CA- SET SP' SCALE TI TLE CERTI FI CATE AP SHED N WIRE FL NO 52 (21'OP' WDED 00 1, THE PERSONS LISTED AS OWNERS ON THIS PLAT DO HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE WITHIN 1 INCH = 10 FEET THE UNDERSIGNED, A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN. INC. S#Â§,T;t D REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PLAT NOTES VIR# NED 66 DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCRUMBRANCES EXCEPT 1,?This Lanclmark Lot Split Plat has been prepared pursuant to and In accordance with AP SHED 0 5 10 15 20 THOSE LISTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE, ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE FACTS STATED City Council Ordinance Number 36 (Series of 2002), Historic Preservation AP SHED ~ ~Os,11â€¢EÂ· AP PVMT ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE, THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT Commission Resolution Number 32 (Series of 2002), and the Subollvlslon Exemption / 60,9,41â€ž - 68. m. OF TITLE, NOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD 3 BOXES NOEL AND AGREED THAT STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC,, NEITHER ASSUMES NOR WILL BE CHARGED Agreement recorded with the PitkIn County Clerk and Recorder as Reception LOT N ! 22 SPRUCE NOEL AP SHE 69 Number _ __, The lands affected by this Plat are subject to the terms and SET COR. WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON ANY STATEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN, conclitions ofs-aid approvals and by all applicable Land Use Regulations of the CIty ~ of Aspen. The terms and condltlons of said approvals and of this Plat shall run with , 71.79 DATED _.___________,2002, the land as covenants burclenIng the same, 22 SP CE NOEL 72 AP PVMT , TI TLE 2.?The 3,000 square foot lot (Lot P) Is entitled to 1,500 square feet of FAR floor area, ' ' FL . STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. and the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and 0) Is entitled to 3,080 square feet of FAR / RED CAP 620 E. HOPKINS AVE, 9018 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 76 floor area, / 3,?Owner reserves the right to request a conditional use approval to develop an / STATE OF COLORADO) additional cletached residential dwelling unit on the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and i AP WD FL â€ž ) ELEC & COMM COUNTY OF PIKTIN > El>J It Is recognized that approval of the site plan and design would be required FL as weR, EASEMENT 6, BK 524 PG 828 THE FOREGOING TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 4.?No further subollvlslon of the lands depicted hereon shall be permitted nor will f DAY OF _--__ _-_---_---_--,2002 BY ------------_ AS --------- OF STEWART additional clwellIng units be built, unless applicable approvals are obtained pursuant , TITLE OF ASPCN, INC. to the Aspen Land Use Code In effect at the time of application / WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRESi 5,?All new development on the depicted properties will conform to the ollmenslonal / requirements of the R-6 zone district, with the exception of the varlances approved by , the HPC under Resolution No, 32, Series of 2002, Notwithstanding the foregoing, an ~/ NOTARY PUBLIC applicant for new development on the subJect lots maintains the rights afforded under , the Land Use Code to request varlances from the dimensional requirements of the ~/ zone district from an entity with the authority to hear and oleclcle upon such requests, f LOT P 6,?HIstorlc Preservation Commission Resolution Number 32, Series of 2002, effectively approved a 500 square foot FAR bonus <already reflected In the FAR limits P / 4 established under note '2/ above), a 1' west slcle yard setback varlance for the Â¢ , Victorian, a 3' west slcle yard setback varlance and a 4' rear yard setback varlance for * 4 LOT O 99 3,000 SQ,FT,+/- SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE a sheol that Is located along the alley, 5' rear yard setback varlances for two other sheds that are located along the alley and a 4' east side yard setback varlance for the , a. 1 3 0,0689 ACRES +/- 9 A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED easternmost of these sheds, a 2' west side yard setback varlance for the Pan Abode, LOT N AND O I, DAVID W, McBRIDE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN JUNE 2002 AND JULY 2002, and a 2' combined side yard setback varlance for the Pan Aboole, 2 / 4 PROPERTY, THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES, BUILDING ENVELOPES, UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, 7,?Owner and future ovners of the Pan Aloode structure located on Lot P, Block 42, City 6,000 SQ.FT,+/- / #f TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER # PCT-17086L, DATED MAY 20, 2002 ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THIS MAP. and Townsite of Aspen, will not apply for a building permit to demollsh salcl structure ale THE CONTROL SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1,10,000 WITH AN ACCURACY TO 0.001 at any time, an agreement reached In recognition of <but not specifically In exchange 01377 ACRES 2/- 22 OF AN ACRE AND THAT THE SURVEY WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRS 1973 TITLE 38, for) HPC's approval of a 500 square foot floor area bonus as part of this lot split, 2 54 ARTICLE 51 AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, 2 LOT p 4 SPRUCE SIGNED THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2002 8.'?Pursuant to Section 26,420,020, Benefits, of the Aspen Land Use Cocle, accessory , olwellIng units (ADUs) or cash In lieu fees shall not be required on/of the subject ,~ properties, i m 36 TTNWD 2* DAVID W, McBRIDE RLS 16129 9. Within thirty (30) clavs of the recorclatton of this plat, the applicant shall obtain ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. from the City Engineering bepartment encroachment licenses for the several encroachments / 210 S. GALENA ST. Into the Pub[Ic RIO.W, (two sheds, the fence, and , 62 ASPEN, CO, 81611 1 = 20 CTTNWD 9g an CITY MONUMENT : M '320' ,~~ CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 3.6 N AP ~ THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY Q THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ASPEN ON THIS _ - DAY OF ._...__., 2002 AS / ORDINANCE NO, 36 SERIES OF 2002 AND RECORDED Ks RECEPTION NO, OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. S75009 149 91'6 43 AP HSE NOEL '304' 24%0% PEARINGS ATTEST, AP WD SIGNED THIS -_- DAY OF , 2002. 44 47 AP BAY AP,;SE NOEL HELEN KLANDERUD, MAYOR KATHRYN S. KOCK, CITY CLERK AP BAY ~ 46 , AP CONC ~ YEL CAP 1 4 LEGEND & NOTES 9184 41 7 P NE ,/ AP WALK. CI TY ENGI NEER' S APPROVAL 4 ,/ THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY YPCa84 , THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 2002, WD FC CURB & GUTTER FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR M TH CAP AS NOTED , 39 38 CITY ENGINEER, NICK ADEH , POL WD 0.32N POL WD F SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SUR*EY CONTROL N ED WALK POL 809'11â€¢W 37 1 (60,00') POSTED ADDRESS IS â€¢304 AND 320 hEST HALLAM ST. ' 27 AP CABIN 0.33N 28 CTTNWD 40 TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY: STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 8 PINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL COMMITMENT NO, 00030505 THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DATED, SEPT. 19, 2002 SET COR, THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN ON Boc 31 THIS -____ DAY OF __--------__--, 2002. O SET CORNER NO. 4 REBAR W/RED CAP CAP 16129 WATER VALVE AP FL (30.00'> 32 SEE SHEET 2 FOR ALL SURVEY FIELD MEASUREMENTS 28 CTTNWD RED CAP DIRECTOR, JULIE ANNE WOODS 36 9018 SE CONC WALK E AP STONE WALL 34 ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, CLERK AND RECORDER' S ACCEPTANCE 30 CTTNWD COLORADO AT ___ 0'CLOCK __,M. ON THIS -___ DAY OF -_-------_---_-, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK _____ AT PAGE ________ AS RECEPTION NUMBER __________________, PFEST CL WALK BOC =G CLERK AND RECORDER, SILVIA DAVIS 1Â£41'LAM~t- BOC (74.38 Vlbb STREET PREPARED BY 1 INDEX . ASPEN SURVEY ENCI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 21 0 S. GALENA STREET SHEET 1 SITE PLAN, CERTIFICATES & NOTES, VICINITY MAP Â· BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT M THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO, 81 611 FI RST DI SCO\~ERED SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED SHEET 2 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY, EXISTING CONDITIONS PHONE /FAX ( 970 > 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL dave@aspenlnfo.corn 0 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWNI HEREON. SHEET 1 OF 2 Job no, 32155A JUNE 7, 2002 ' REVISED 12-03-02 , I ./ Â®0 Sat Mar 22 14: 15: 36 2003 4 , UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT 64 SCALE ED GRVL ALLEY GRAVEL SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET CDR AP WD-W AP SHED L SET SP' 0 5 10 15 20 'OGAF NDE~ TRASH F BLOCK S75005 0.00'> WR, ED â€¢ CS 742 2 'E 90,50' S SHED ; AP S ED ...AP PVMT AP SHED Â· Â·Â·Â·...3,1'11'E 30 HEA . .. 1 1 EN, h AP - BOXES NORjD PAVEMENT LOT M ... i 2~*PR CE N AP SHE 1 2. , E - 22 PtIlCE N 0.50' MEAS AP PVMT ' FL 22 RED CAP 9018 4 , .I % 1 73 Â· i* i AP WD FL e ELEC & COMM FL /3 EASEMENT 6, LOT N BK 524 PG 828 ,/27 / Â·1 1 1 1 . i l / 1 , 28Â·2 1 PATIO 1 2 6 Â· LOT k 0 2 6 ' LEGEND & NOTES 22 8% 1 1 /6 / 1.- 1 / f O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR \. TH CAP AS NOTED 23, 4 | 4'u. e SPI KE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL 2 STORY 06' - LOT P 4 SPRUG;*~ POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 kEST HALLAM ST, ' VICTORIAN ~ ~ 36 ~7~2 36' W S / 4/#Bek V WOOD FRAME ~ 20' 44~1fa & 3 02 -8- hOOD FENCE PANABODE 4 1& cd -- \4 RE FENCE .'--i 4421#* HOUSE 1 3.3, O UTI LI TY BOX st R 9.53 20 CTÂ¥~ ,7 z Efe Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 1. 0 e &0 -- CITY MONUMENT ' ~' SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 <90,00 42 . '320' .. 1 LOT Q 3,6 N AP FL 1 6, i j 4 ' COMMITMENT NO. PCT-17086L TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYi PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, <375009'11 / 1 3.TORY WOOD BASIS OF REARINGS PINE ' 904' 89,99'"MEAS AP WD AP HSE , DATED JUNE 27, 2002 3.65' 12.4, I ~ 01 6 /N ./ , (90.009 9184 . 7' AP BM APHS ' Â· * / ~~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED 6.8, AP BAY â€¢ â€¢ 4 - / 6 b. . P 8' ~ ~~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED AP CON j a. 1 YEL CAP ' 1 1 , AP WALK CALLS IN < ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 2-20' CITY OF ASPEN, 4 rpca./ ' ' WDF l l ~ POL W 0.32N POL WD F 20,0' i (60,000 8 PI.,Er 1 ED WALK P n 9.99, MEAS 59,99, HEAS, 1 1 54' 34*11-42 28' a , AP CABIN 0.33N l (N 75009'11'W) I e BOC Y 31* 6 0 WATER VALVE' SET AP FL 3 ' WATER - VALVE 28' (30.00') 28 C RED CAP 9018 SECONCWALK E STONE WALL AP STONE WALL CONC, CURB 30 ClmEAN 30' 4 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY & GUTTER WEST M~G CL WALK BDC 41-444 " - BOC LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, AL CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, STREET PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S, GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT I N THI S PLAT WI THI N THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81 611 FI RST DI SCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE/FAX < 970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT I N THI S PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS ' E-MAIL clave@aspeninfo,com a FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHO\.N HEREON. C Job no, 321 55 NOV: 25, 2002 SHEET 2 OF 2 I \ 1. - 3'E MEAS. 43,2, HEAS 4050'49'E Sat Mar 22 14: 19: 30 2003 UHL HISTORIC LAN-DMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT 4 n 64 SCALE I ED GRVL ALLEY 0 5 10 15 20 GRAVEL SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET COR BLOCK L AP WD-W AP SHED L / TRASHi 100. : S75005'01'E 90,50' MEAf WIR# ED . SHED AP S ED Â¢P SHED .7- 2 CS 75009'11'E .90,00') ' Mp PVMT ~~ .. 1 ~ ENT-n Ap BOXES NOZL~~~~~~~---eVEMENT 2-SPR CE N AP SHE I J 2. S'â‚¬-D , E 22 Pl~CE N I * A l 4 , / , 1% 1 A , 2 1 LOT /2 / 1 ; 1 1 2 1 I. , 1 -3bpt:LD k-*% 11 28.2 | PATIO Â£07 12 1 IT , ' 0Â»:2$3:1 1 1 LEGEND & NOTES i / 02 11-1 11' 1 1 2 1 k .fl 1 3 1 11 1 F l fl I &1 10 1 1 .t /q- 49; 17 0 e SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL O F0UND SURVEY M0NUMENT REBAR \4 TH CAP AS N0TED , h....J d ff,; i.1 1 *9"J 1% 1 2 STORY 1 0-1 N.-t.\.1- 4 PICTORIA,V ~ ~u ~ POSTED ADDRESS IS ' 304 AND 320 WEST HALLAM ST. ' WOOD FRAME 36' ~ -El-- \â‚¬108 FENCE . -*- M RE FENCE HOUSE 20'a#prk I UTILITY BOX 5,05 20 CT'0;94I ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER / 4 . 1- CITY MONUMENT 1 / 4 / SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 . 42 '320' i . LOT Q 36 N AP FL 1 .6, / TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYI PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. <375009 h , COMMITMENT NO, PCT-17086L '11.0 265 4 12 4,~ HSE * 1.6, . a \ DATED, JUNE 27, 2002 BASIS OF BEARINGS PINE ' CITY OF ASPEN. AP WD ' 89.99//leÂ« C90.Â£70,~~~ 9184. 70 / AP VALK i f.17 / L--,f AP BAY APHS ' - ' 15 , Â·;,~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED 6.8' AP BAY â€¢ . I ; i h AP CON ' ~ . 1 ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED ft- 1 i 11 YEL CAP Â· , CALLS IN ( ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 79 , 4 Â¥PC a . 1 WD F / . 1 1 . 1 1 38 ED WALK P CL 5999 A.I.12 28' ' 9,99/ MEAS NEAS <60,00'> 28 ClFALE= i 6 1 (90Â·00'> (N 75009 PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO '11'WO BOC 31 A. (30,00,3 RED CAP Â· SET WATER VAL VP AP FL 3 ' WATER VALVE 28' 28 C e 9018 SECONCWALK E STONE WALL AP STONE WALL 3 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY & GUTTER 30 Cl~1 30' WEST ME' CL WALK BOC 44Â£44 ) - BE LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, 14 CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PREPARED BY 1 1 1 â€¢An,Mi: â€¢11}nAAE ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S. GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT \4 THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FI RST DI SCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. I N NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTI ON BASED PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL dave@aspeninfo.com m FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWN HEREON. Job no. 32155 NOV: 25, 2002 ' SHEET 2 OF 2 13*Er-431 43,2, 0,03 MEAS 16.1, '2Â·92/ Sat Mar 22 14: 27: 30 2003 2 f 11 d a ROOFLINE ABOVE design collaborative, llc. 1 skalko .haas 1 1 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 -it=* phone (970) . 309.0695 fa x (970) . 920. 7822 | |ENTRY 4 1 5 . i i p /$1 /L3, /$1 e-mail --- KITCHEN i Fâ„¢r=UATH BEDROOM =I. derek@studiobarchitects.net 7 455,4 x [3621 r-TI----- . 0 11 3 -- -*i----lill---- -7 Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 0 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ~ | THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 1 1 PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN | | COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF EE -- ===== EE THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN ~. ~. PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL I 4]1 1/~Â»43~E RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 1 COPYRIGHT 2003 A- -----------1- ----------- f --------- ----------- t -4 ~~ 2 CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE LIVINe AREA i OFFICE i 4- rial I 1 11 1 ROOFLINE ABOVE TRUE PRCkECT NORTH ARROM NORTH ARROW 211EXISTINGPLAN - PANABODE (33 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) 25_EXISTINGSQUIH ELEVATION \45/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0,1 A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTHI ROOFLINE ABOVE 11 1 11 1 11 1 - - -- f 1 1 1 HÂ·1-Â·---=====i~q 9031 p==g Ik ~ Ill / li FLIEI~unl / 11 \1 ROOFLINE ABOVE ~Rev. ~ Construction issue date: Drawing Title: EXISTING CONDITIONS 'rRUE PRO.ET 221EXISTING_ROOE PLAN - PANABODE NORTH ARROIN NORTH ANOIN (41 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) cil EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 320 HALLAM STREET \A-HIS/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" \t25/ SCALE . 1/4" = 1'-0" Sheet #: A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTHI A-HIS eouepisehl seeH Xpnr pl.13 118/t I~TrtrÂ£4!0 Fri Mar 21 19: 09: 45 2003 /2 d a f ff f f design collaborative, llc. .. UIGHT PeLL WITH GRATING 7R skalko . haae 1 1 117 -------7 --:0 rj-------7 aspen colorado 81611 320 oak lane n n m . phone (970) . 309.0695 ll.J 44 .1~ O 1 - fi<. r EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF PAN ABOPE ABOVE 1 / --N fa x (970) . 920. 7822 11 125 R* 7"=10'-6 1/2" / e-mall '1 1 1 - 1 --Â· derek@studiobarchitects.net -4. 1 1 11 / up-- - 11 .4 1\ / 1 f ~ MECHANICAL ' 18 -9 lili 'J 1 1 ! 2 \ / Â· 1 1 ( D / 1 i. 1 1 '\ I 'lf --- - - Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 11 ~ ~ 0' ~ | | COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 1 4. i 1 4 1 111 -, 1 1 ..1 1 1 1 1 1.--- ----r-~ I ' ' THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT i I a Â·Â· 11 1 ' ' ~~ CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE ' 1 BEDROOM 4 0 ' '! - COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF || PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN PEN 1 - L - - - tj. 11 - 1 4.----.' ~ COPIED WITHOUTTHE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 1 1 [ER' ExÂ® 1 ' ~ ~~~ THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 1 -/ R ,------*, i, ____~ PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1= 1 I - . Ill ---. - . - .- . -- . il. I m - 1 1 1 ; 4: - 1 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY ~ DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL * ~ RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY I lit AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, tÂ·~ 0-,1,2.Â·Fic/2:'i'Â·t.k: 'Â·Â·-'Â·-.Â·.':309?-Â·.-1.1:=15 J.41 . 31%11 1~'4.-i. 9.-*:-4117Â· ...Â·1-----Â· COPYRIGHT 2003 :r -Ii- 7 1 1 -i -----l r----------7 400 ). _ ~ CON}2511NS HALL ON PIER FolÂ»OATIOW ABOVE i : 3- m t. 11 R CLOSET MECHANICAL 1-*El . 1// .* 1 1 1- - - lia EXISTINS FOOTPRINT OPPANABODE ABOVe ~._jJ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~* ~~~~~~~~k. 04 .14 t.Â¢f..3,... ~.â‚¬'~.7.'~% ... I~.. I ' L______-3 Boole=LP BUMF-OUT ABOVE ~ L_______________-3 10 47, 1 11 C i 1 1 LU /11 TRUE PROET 4 4 4 0 00 Ci, (3 , 4, 4/ El m c C 1 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN ~22.0/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" Â«TÂ» NORTH O 4- NO 0 1 1 91/--- 7-4--4-77 J 1 LlÂ®HT RELL )11â„¢-371Nt-7 3 1 fm Im 1 1 1 z-.-1. / \\11 /7 EXISTING - - Flm-0 . - 0 - 174 0 g'3\ . i, L _ JIL _ _dll _ JIL _ _JIL -g 4 4 - 11/1 r -7 23 1 %,I.......... 1 , I 11 1 4 11 1 ENTRY j -'*/%*Z+# CLOSET " ~ < 1 ' '~ 1 0 . I . 1 - -a 1 LIVING AREA L----- -, KITCHEN 1-_ 3**1 9 [3554 er ---4-----------------73*TH---- - -- --- [*Ax] 1 Ke 1 1. r- ---Â« - -11- -- - -- - ~i-N.----- - 1 11 1 -a -E76 1_'.-P#-----=a E ~ 1 (3 -rÂ·-Â·Â·------Â·-- i 4-1-- F ' 7 o 1-Exi r--*---- 1.11 1 1 -- 09....=.. mÂ»Gm,00PV....m~,q~~W,1-/... 1 1 1 i 1 ~C... 00 t 1- r=F "~---~-7-=ir - -=-ip Â«6- ---_ 47.- - -00 -7 1 d - lit N 1 =11 11 .., 0 - L ji-- ======== '7 1 - 1 1 1 71 KAL-WAL SKYLIGHT ABOVE .3 E----/-'1 g L_--_-----__-_-___-___--- 1 5@4 P 1 -10 - 1 eATHERING AREA | 1! 1 1 1 1 132-xi I * c GUANTUM FOLDIN* TRAGIC DN L - *. - --, Mija 1%**0&62. ma/*1----flr=--f*| 0' 1 MUD AREA 3 --_--_ "1 DINING AREA ~ 1-352*1 1 BRIDGE q i \ H /HALL 1 1 MASH DRY REF 1 f i 1 11 / 1 ill Ill Ill i.:.-' m Â£11 Eli....1,-.:/11,>t /'iNÂ·:q,*1-1.-=:,Â·Â·95.7. BUILT IN BOOKSHELVES ... 1 -' 111 111 1 111 111 111 111 - 1 1 U ' 7-/-- # W Ill 111 111 111 111 -> ~,0~~* j Rev. ~ Construction issue date: 1 1 Drawing Title: PROPOSED PLANS 320 HALLAM STREET /feh TRJE PROJEOT Sheet#: 44 4 4 1 C / â‚¬ , 4, 30, / 91% (23 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN tiv ~2.1,/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH A-2.1 Judy Haas Resuence BIKE STORAGE AREA Fri Mar 21 19: 07: 56 2003 .,i, f T Y design collaborative, llc. skalko haao 320 oak lane - - - - - ----- EXISTING phone(970).309.0695 aspen colorado 81611 E- -7 PPE PL E XI TIN TREE fa x (970) . 920. 7822 SA I SE M T om e ITH IMI A P 90 T e-mail derek@studiobarchitects.net EXPOSED 3Xq CEDAR FRAMINe FV 1 1 LEXAN TRANSLUCENT 1 0 1 ~ lili PANELING TO BE APPLIED 1 Ill Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN ' T T 1 1 1 1 1.1.- OVER TOP COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 11'1111 . 1 11 11 11 !1 11 CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 2, ---, L__-MEZE-ma*Il_._1 / ~h PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN GEPAR SHINGLES COLLABORATIVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN RIDGE VENT DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY 1<AL- L SKY ISHT AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 1 , COPYRIGHT 2003 -11 - - - BRI SE TO IE TO EXI TI ~- - - / i i /1 ROFO 1 2 d' 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 0 9 - 1 11 - (3- / 43- / NORM ARROM NOWn, AM- / 1 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN NORTHI A 17\.1 I 533= 4 ~Rev. ~ ~ Construction issue date: Drawing Title: Â»Â«0 2-r PROPOSED ROOF PLAN & CONTEXT ELEVATION Sheet #: (21 PROPOSED CONTEXT ELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET A-2.2 eouep!Sehl se H Xpnr Puln~/t 17:FrpÂ° f Sat Mar 22 14: 52: 41 2003 .#ki:lit, b f Il 0 1 d i f' 1 a design collaborative, llc. skalko haau k T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 1 T.O. RIPSE BEAM phone (970) . 309.0695 fax (970) . 920. 7822 1 1 e-mail derek@studiobarchitects.net Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 1 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT lS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 6 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 1 T.O. PLATE PININe BUMP-OUT COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 6 T.O. PLATE BRIDGE LOM COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY ELEV.106'4" DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY 41111 lili lillillil~in , I!1'! AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 11 COPYRIGHT 2003 11 ] 1 1 111 71 011111 LECLItiltil, e Iilli 1 lilli 1 A T.O. PLMD. MAIN LEVEL 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 /1 3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION - ADDITION i~ ~ A3.1-SCALE:1/4"=-106"'1 1 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 T.0. CONG. LOMER LEVEL ELEV.IM" /7 / N | | -_-_-_-_-_-_-_ 1 T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT A T.O. RIDGE BEAM 7 ELEV. 118'-7" L 111 ~ 1 lili 1 1 i-Ii---------- - 1 T.O. PLATE PORCH OUTBACK Kill @11.12 111/11 1 1 1. P !h Ill"1 ' I 11.11..1 1111 I!1111 ~~ 1~ *Fr in i 1 1 LIlli 1 1 1. :11 i qth'.1 := 1 ---- _-_-_-_-_ 6 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE 1 1 1 1 T.O. PLATE BRIDeE HIGH 11~ 111~1~~11111,1111 lili 111,1111 11 1 ELEV.IOa'-6Â£3/4" / 1 /1 7-1 1: * 00 1: 1111 1 I Ii,!,l i l li lilli lil i l' 1 f ill 1 / 1 / \1 11 / - %----7 1 1 11/ 11=-El'[--1 EE 1 \11 lili, 1 11\XII/xII 1 1 L_.31 11 1 1 11\ 1 ~ 11/1 ' "1 \ 11 \ 11 ------------ ---------------1--- i' 1 TO. PLAP. MAIN LEVEL/ ERIC>SE 1 1 1 11[r=Eli 11 lili 11 I lilli ./ 11 11 11 1 lilli. 1 1 // 1 lili \\111 1 1 m - --H.... ~Rev. ~ 1 1 11 luz==all 11=====1.1 11 1 Construction 11 LE=ZE= ; T.O. GONG. LIGHTNELL BASE issue date: V ELEV. 111-10" - Drawing Title: 11 1 11 ADDITION ELEVATIONS AT.O. GONG. LOWER LEVEL -------------- ~ 320 HALLAM STREET Sheet #: /21 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 ADD pu3duc 17Cul410 eouep!sekl seeH Xpnr / f Il 1 9 d ~ PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTING FLUE a PROPOSE TO ADD SKYLIeHT TO ROOF y -- - -A T.O. KAL-+NAL 91<YLISHT PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF 1 1 T.O. RIDeE BEAM design collaborative, llc. - , PROPOSE TO IMPROVE EXISTING FASCIA skajko haas A T.O. PLATE POROH OUTBACK - aspen colorado 81611 320 oak lane 12 1 1 1097 . I- PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTING WINDOW phone (970) . 309.0695 fa x (970) . 920. 7822 , LOCATION AND SIZINe MITH UPeRADED e-mail TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PATTERN TO derek@studiobarchitects.net CLAD OR WOOD NINDOWS BY' MAUFACTURER MATCH EXISTINe CONDITIONS 6 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE - r . COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 11 N 1 1 11 PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTING STAIRS Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 2 LLE ---ELEV='-Br MITH MORE APPROPRIATE HISTORIC SOLUTION â€¢1 T.o. PLATE_2[NINe BUMP-OUT THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF (31 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALLAM ST. FACADE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN ~3.~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL 1/ \111 AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 f f 1 T.O. PLKIP. MAIN LEVEL ____-4---------- PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTING FLUE 1 1 - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF 111 1 1 1 11 11 11 11 111 1 11 11 11 11 11 1,1 1 T.O. CONC. LISHTMELI_ BASE lit=&: 7.1 41!121 -EXLE.a====a=.a.~ PROPOSE TOMAINTAIN EXISTINe WINDOW 11 E--ij ELEV.fl'-IO" LOCATION AND SIZINe WITH UPGRADED Ell hl'4. l' 1 t..11.-14.1-i.Â· i}f.'-1:..I / 511.9 OLAD OR INOOD WINDO]45 BY MAUFACTURER 1 FRI'll . I TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PATERN TO 1 T.O. GONG. LOKER LEVEL Â£ Â· 111------I>--~~~~~~--4'f-~~-~Ut~~~~,~~~ILLIELLIECD MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. PROPOSE TO REF=INISH PAN-ABOPE STAIN 1 ..11 /1 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION E.236*LE:1/4"-2-iÂ« /43 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" -~ j AND CONNECT PAN-ABODE TO NEPL ADDITION (f f - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTING GLAD MINDOPI 1 T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT WITH 1'-0" (INTERIOR DIMENSION AT LOW SIDE) -1- ~52_mtzâ€¢np, ~ CONNECTION ELEMENT. CONNECTOR PIECE TO TIE 1 T.O. RIDeE BEAM INTO EXISTINe PAN-ABODE ROOF GONE>ITION PUE 1 -3- -T--1---ELEV.1le,7â€ž __L~s=-El-.~~CO~ TO BUILDINe COPE HEISHT MINIMUMS 4 FOR LEAST AMOUNT OF: IMPACT TO PENDINe ICE BUILDUP 1 ~--___14- r-Â·.-..Or--/ CONDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURE IF LOPâ‚¬RED | KN--l t -- 7 - =~ [ i-- ITM#9* P~-*=72d~ REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOXES 4 METERS 12 Ul-111 - 11 1-[22493!ff 1 1 '!' ." iu]:I|_. I. _.-~â€ž,'*:C~ TO MORE ASTHETICALLY DESIRABLE LOCATION 5--1 lili 14 1 107 1 .1 . 11.11 -1 Cul-/1//*7[p] 1,-Itlt - 1 4#- - 1 |lf-----LIC~IL I f ~ r Â· 11 | . STYLE OF NINDON TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH ALL 1 ,=9214;24-=.21~' - ~ - ' A=p~~ REPLACE EXISTING WINDOW WITH LARGER WINDOW 1 11 1 MINE>OhIS TO BE REPLACED 1 +Â« # ~ - __,iI 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE - --17ELEVIJ,5- i T.O. PLATE DININe BUMP-OUT i , 1 T.O. PLATE BRIDeE HIGH A T.o. PLATE.BRDSE LOW 1/ \1 -ELEV. 108'-0' 1512RQEQSED_EASTELEMATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACADE ~23.0/ SCALE : 1/4. = 1'-0" 1 T.O. PLIND. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPSE -ELEV 100 0 - PROPOSE TO ADD SKYLIeHT TO ROOF - - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FLUE ri--------------- ---------il 1111 11 1 0 -- 1 _- PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF 11 11 11 11 11 11 â€¢- - rr- 11 . /1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili U 1 1 1 1 1. . 1 1 11 1 1 1 111 1 1 .11 141 11 i 1 EE 1 1 1 11 1 1 Construction LE=== 11 --ELEV.ql'-IO" W.1-~1 1 111----8----1 LOCATION AND SIZINe WITH UPeRADED - 1 T.O. CONCÂ·. LIeHTY Eli BASE -H.9 - m *:AN I Ill _ issuedate: PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe WINDON Drawing Title: E-H~ i li GLAD OR WOOD WINDOINS BY MAUFACTURER ADDITION ELEVATIONS 1 '112ItÂ»I=jti rTT-----------------------H----'ll're=pl,Â·Sr-----Â·-----1 TO BE DETERMINED - _ 1 T.O. CONG. LOFIER LEVEL -1=l L_ZEZZE-____--_____ ____ ___ 320 HALLAM STREET HI~ PROPOSE TOREFINISH PAN-ABODE STAIN Sheet#: 21-PROPOSECLEABLELEMATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION A-3.2 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" /61 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ADD puE' te/t - TCt Jo 40 eouepise~ seeHApnr Sat Mar 22 14: 40: 19 2003 JUDY HAAS RE S IDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL REVIEW DIRECTORY INDEX July 9th, 2003 Q.ELNER_: JUDY HAAS A.O COVER SHEET /CONTACT REFERENCE /FAR CALCULATIONS po box 330 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT aspen, colorado 81612 SURVEY Al.O VICINITY MAP - 320 NEST HALLAM PROPERTY tel 470.425.6848 tel (studio) 470,425. 6840 Al.5 PROPOSED SITE AND TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN Fax 470325.88610 A2.0 EXISTINe HISTORIC CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION A2.1 LOWER 4 MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED PLANS A2.2 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS Â¢ CONTEXT ELEVATION DESIGNERD: ONE FRIDAY DESIeN COLLABORATIVE, LLC. Ae.1-3.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS derek m. skalko; principal designer A4.1 BUILPINe SECTIONS .judy haas; project designer r AIO.1 ININDOPV 4 DOOR SCHEDULE 320 oak lane aspen, colorado 81611 11 tel q-to.5001.0645 fax 470.420.7822 .: 1 / 4 - 11 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS: eLENWOOD STRUCTURAL Â¢ CIVIL; INC. jim romeo; professional engineer 1-41 ~ consulting structural engineers 2425 south grand avenue, suite 102 glenwood springs, colorado 81601 ~ d tel 470.428.0135 Fax 6170.6128.6004 eENERAL CONTRACTOR: [4...f-=f~ design collaborative,llc. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS skalko . haas Zoning: RA Lot Area: 3000 662. FT. FAR Ptfn=L. IMaximum Allowable Floor Area: 1,500 50. FT. 1Ii[E]Ilitij~ lili 11 11 1 1 11 lili 11 lili 11 1 1 11 1 1 111 Mil 11 lilill lili Gross Area (sf) Item * Main Level (included: pan-abode 1,378 4 main level addition) Eli-T-IETTJ-]7TT173333-I[37TTTr11-]77EFTTTIhrrn=zccom i-i'~1 f [p~~-" -'~J-41 111.1 -' 01 Frl * Lower Level 450 A WKE.fll'1111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 (8.1 percent of lower level (76.q countable) 1 -~ Â»-4.--4--1-". 11'1111111 ~ Il I~- ~~,-~1111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 Il countable towards FAIR) tz,1-1,11111111111 TOTALS 1,454.q E f, 111111111 1 A.,1.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1,454Â·.q < 1,500 - FAR Is OK Notes: A) The lopver level (600 sq ft In plan) consists of a sq. footage of wall area 20' x 30' x q'-e" In depth. The lower level also contains a light well of 3' x q'-61' x 6'6" In depth, bringing the total wall surface area of the lower level to 5,575.5 54 feet of surface area. OF this total, the light well area and 6" of perimeter area around the structure will be exposed, bringing the exposure percentage to 475.5 sq. ft., which counts for 8.1% exposure to be used against FAR. Thu Jun 12 00: 50: 08 2003 Y UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT A/NER' S CERTI FI CATE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT COLORADO DOES HEREBY SUBDIVIDE AND REPL.AT THIS REAL PROPERTY UNDER THE NAME KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL BEING THE RECORD OWNER OF LOTS N, 0, AND P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND 1-OWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, AND STYLE OF LOT N AND O, AND LOT P UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. EXECUTED THIS __ DAY OF ______, 2002. LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL , CI TY & TOW4SI TE OF ASPEN, BY: BY, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ANTON UHL, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE JULIE GRANT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF COLORADO > >SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF j , 2002 BY ANTON UHL AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL. (30.00 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF _________) ! >SS COUNTY OF ________> THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ___ DAY OF , 2002 BY JULIE GRANT AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARETE A. UHL. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL i 64 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 4 ED GRVL ALLEY i NOTARY PUBLIC SET COR \ X VICINITY MAP AP WD W N ~~L 0 CA- SCALE SET SP' TI TLE CERTI FI CATE AP SHED N WIRE FL NO 62 (21.07' WDE) DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCRUMBRANCES EXCEPT 1 INCH = 10 FEET THE UNDERSIGNED, A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC, TR D REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT f / $ PLAT NOTES VIR# f THE PERSONS LISTED AS OWNERS ON THIS PLAT DO HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE WITHIN 1 1,?Thls Landmark Lot Split Plat has been prepared pursuant to and In accordance with 6P SHED 0 5 10 15 20 THOSE LISTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE, ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE FACTS STATED AP SHED S 05009'11'E 08 EtrymiS:57'~JUING~eN~~~~~~r3~6(~~;~:so~f2~~~f'a~~ste a==~e~on '/ OF TITLE, NOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE, THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT 60.RF'*10 Â· 3 BOXES NOEL AND AGREED THAT STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC., NEITHER ASSUMES NOR WILL BE CHARGED , Agreement recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder as Reception LOT M ~ 22 SPRUCE NOEL 69 DATED,-_-__________. 2002. Number _ , The lands affected by this Plat are subject to the terms and AP SHE SET COR, WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON ANY STATEMENT n conditions-ofs-aid-approvals and by all applicable Land Use Regulations of the City / CONTAINED HEREIN of Aspen. The terms and conditions of said approvals and of this Plat shall run with , n the land as covenants burdenlng the same. ~ 22 SP CE NOEL n AP PVMT , TI TLE , FL STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 2.?The 3,000 square foot lot (Lot P) is entitled to 1,500 square feet of FAR floor area, ) RED CAP 620 E, HOPKINS AVE, and the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and 0) is entitled to 3,080 square feet of FAR , ,6 9018 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ' floor area. , STATE OF COLORADO> 3?Owner reserves the right to request a conditional use approval to clevelop an / Ap WD FL >Ss additional cletached residential clwelling unit on the 6,000 square foot lot (Lot N and 04 It Is recognized that approval of the site plan and oleslgn would be requIred ELEC & COMM. 74 FL COUNTY OF PIKTIN ) as well, EASEMENT 6, LOT BK 524 PG 828 THE FOREGOING TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNI]WLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS , 4,?No further subcllvlslon of the lands cleplcted hereon shall be permitted nor will N / DAY OF ---_- --_-_____---_,2002 BY -_-------__-_ AS --------- OF -STEWART additional clwellIng units be built, unless applicable approvals are obtained pursuant ' TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. to the Aspen Land Use Code In effect at the time of application. ,/ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES, 5,?All new development on the deplcted properties will conform to the dimensional / requirements of the R-6 zone district, with the exception of the varlances approved by i the HPC under Resolution No. 32, Series of 2002, Notwithstanding the foregoing, an ~/ applicant for new development on the subJect lots maintains the rights afforded under . ~ NOTARY PUBLIC the Land Use Code to request varlances from the dimensional requirements of the / zone district from an entity with the authority to hear and decide upon such requests. l W 6,?Historic Preservation Commission Resolution Number 32, Series of 2002, effectively N J approved a 500 square foot FAR bonus (already reflected In the FAR limits P / 0, established under note '2/ above), a 1' west slcle yard setback varlance for the Â¥ LOT 42 Victorian, a 3' west side yard setback variance and a 4' rear yard setback varlance for % / 4 3,000 SQ,FT,+/- SURVEYER' S CERTI ~PI CATE 0 a shed that Is located dong the alley, 5' rear yard setback varlances for two other 0 00 LOT N AND 0 0 shecls that are located along the dley ancl a 4' east side yard setback variance for the 4 5 2 2 0.0689 ACRES +/- I, DAVID W, McBRIDE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN JUNE 2002 AND JULY 2002, easternmost of these shecls, a 2' west side yard setback varlance for the Pan Aloode, 2 A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTII]N AND SUPERVISION OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED and a 2' combined side yard setback varlance for the Pan Abode. 2 / PROPERTY. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES, BUILDING ENVELOPES, O W UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, 7.'?Owner and future owners of the Pan Aboole structure located on Lot P, Block 42, CIty 6,000 SQ.FT,+/- / 92 TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER # PCT-17086L, DATED MAY 20, 2002 ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THIS MAP, and Townslte of Aspen, will not apply for a building permit to dertollsh said structure at any time, an agreement reached In recognition of <but not specifically In exchange 01377 ACRES t/- 8 W THE CONTROL SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1.10.000 WITH AN ACCURACY TO 0,001 for) HPC's approval of a 500 square foot floor area bonus as part of this lot split, i Y .7 OF AN ACRE AND THAT THE SURVEY WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRS 1973 TITLE 38, 2 54 ARTICLE 51 AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. 8,?Pursuant to Section 26,420.020, Benefits, of the Aspen Land Use Code, accessory , LOT P 4 SPRUCE SIGNED THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2002 clwellIng units <ADUs) or cash In lieu fees shall not be required on/of the subject ~ ' properties, 36 TTNWD ) DAVID W, McBRIDE RLS 16129 9, Within thirty (30) days of the recordation of this plat, the applicant shall obtain ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC, from the City Engineering Department encroachment licenses for the several encroachments 210 S. GALENA ST. Into the Pub[Ic R.O.W. (two sheets, the fence, and clumpster) O â‚¬3 ASPEN, CO. 81611 50 4 0 20 CTINVD d 1.90 CI TY COUNCI L APPRE]VAL -- CITY MONUMENT , '320' l 5.6 N AP ~ i LOT Q THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ASPEN ON THIS ---_ DAY OF , 2002 AS / ORDINANCE NO. 36 SERIES OF 2002 AND RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. ____________ OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, S75009 ;49 '11*E AP WD ' '304' 43 AP HSE NOEL SIGNED THIS ___ DAY OF , 2002. BASIS OF BEARINGS 1 47 AP BAY AP HSE NOEL ~ ATTESTI 45 HELEN KLANDERUD, MAYOR KATHRYN S. KOCK, CITY CLERK AP BAY ~ : 46 YEL CAP .. 41 LEGEND & NOTES 9184 AP WALK CITY ENGINEER' S APPROVAL 7 P NE 4 THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY YPC E184 THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS ----- DAY OF ---_----------, 2002, , WD FC (30.00 FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR M TH CAP AS NOTED 39 38 CITY ENGINEER, NICK ADEH POL WD 0.32N POL WD F SPIKE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL ED WALK VOL 009'11â€¢w i (60.00.) 27 AP CABIN 0.33N POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 WEST HALLAM ST. ' 28 CTTNWD 40 TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY, STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 8 PINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL COMMITMENT NO, 00030505 DATED, SEPT, 19, 2002 SET COR. THIS PLAT OF THE UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN ON . THIS ----- DAY OF __---_-__-----, 2002. O SET CORNER NO. 4 REBAR W/RED CAP CAP 16129 WATER VALVE AP FL 32 SEE SHEET 2 FOR ALL SURVEY FIELD MEASUREMENTS 28 CTTNWD RED CAP DIRECTOR, JULIE ANNE WOODS 36 9018 SE CONC WALK ~ E AP STONE WALL CONE ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, CURB & CLERK AND RECORDER' S ACCEPTANCE ~ GUTTER 30 CTTNWD COLORADO AT _-_ 0'CLOCK __ M. ON THIS _--- DAY OF ___--------_--_, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK _____ AT PAGE ________ AS RECEPTION NUMBER __________________, TNEST CL WALK 300 CLERK AND RECORDER, SILVIA DAVIS HALUM BOC (74.38' WIDE) STREET 1 PREPARED BY r INDEX ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION 210 S, GALENA STREET ' ' SHEET 1 SITE PLAN, CERTIFICATES & NOTES, VICINITY MAP ASPEN, COLO. 81 611 ' BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT M THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU i FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED SHEET 2 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY, EXISTING CONDITIONS PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspenlnfo.com 21 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FICATI ON SHOWNI HEREON. SHEET 1 OF 2 Job no. 32155A JUNE 7, 2002 REVISED 12-03-02 \ Â®O / UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT N ED adt 231 vEL ALLEY SCALE 1 INCH = 10 FEET - #4 AP WD-W AP SHED L SET SP' '00Af ~ TRASHE 0 5 10 15 20 -E)Â£ oCk 275005/01.Â£ 90,50, MEAIP 2& ED . 262-2 F SHED (S 75009'11'E 90.00-3 , AP S ED ./ 1 LOT SHer, AP BOXES NO~'11~| PAVEMENT .. 1 27PR CE N AP SHE 2. IDE 6 j 22 PirCE N 0,00" AP PVMT 0,50, ' L i 22 MEAS RED CAP 9018 .. la l . 73 APWDFL ELEC & COMM. FL BK 524 PG 828 EASEMENT 6, LOT N 0 1 1 1 1 1 . I # 1 1 2 STORY , 1 CO 28.2 l PATIO fig g Â£07. 0 12 2 W 20 , r 5% / / LEGEND & NOTES * 2 ~2 '6 i l= 1 O FOUND SURVEY M[]NUMENT REBAR M TH CAP AS NOTED 3,) 4 :1 4... e SPIKE OR P-K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL , 1 LOT p 4 SPRLi~* 1/ICTORIAN ~ 36 b*ce 36' W S L~Â£ 2 POSTED ADDRESS IS'304 AND 320 kEST HALLAM ST. ' WOOD FRAME 1 STORY WOOD -El- \,CIOD FENCE 4, 7& c~ -*- \4 RE FENCE HOUSE 2 1 , VABACC 20,~ -948.1 & 3- 0 13 6 2 9% O UTILITY BOX 90 9 1 54 20 CT'*1~~ W V Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 5 05 / 1 94561, 4 9 02 he . 2- CITY MONUMENT : 1 22 -J SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 42 , 9200 1 LOT Q 3,6 N AP FL l ,/ TITLE INFORMATII]N WAS FURNISHED BY: PITI<IN COUNTY TITLE, INC. (375009 '11*E> 3.65' 4 ' 124, i BASIS Or pr PIN ' '304' DATED, JUNE 27, 2002 AP WD R HsE do ~,4, ~ ' COMMITMENT NO, PCT-17086L 89,99'Alf-AS ARINGS ~~(U Ap Hs #Ar.. . h . / Â«,F;1~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED 0, , <90,00') 4. 1 6.8, AP BAY 1 PA NABODE 6 '46 J h. 4 . CO DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED AP CON â€¢ YEL CAP Â· ' 9184 - 7' ,/ AP VALK ,/ CALLS IN < ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 2-20' CITY OF ASPEN, E. .. ao' 38 VDF .. 1 1 , i J POL W O.329 POL WD F ED WALK P EL | | - 5.4, ASIA 28' . 9,99, MEAS, 59,99' HEAS, (60,000 AP CABIN 0.33N 28 Cl~F 8640 /1 (90,00') (N 75009'11'W) .6 0 BOC .4 . 21,0, f WATER VALVE SET AP FL 3 ' WATER - VALVE 28* <30.00') 28 C RED CAP le 9018 SE CONC WALK E STONE WALL AP STONE WALL . k COA/4 & IMPROVEMENT SURVEY CURB & GUTTER 30 Cl~~~ 30' WEST Mi, LOTS N, O, CL WALK BOC 44 LIA , - BOC & P, BLOCK 42, 1\1 CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI ON 210 S. GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO, 81611 FI RST DI SCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE /FAX ( 970) 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BECOMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL clave@aspenlnfo.com m FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWNI HEREON. Job no. 32155 NOM 25, 2002 ' SHEET 2 OF 2 Z./- MEAS. Sat Mar 22 14: 19: 30 2003 / r UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT - N ED GR~L ...494 4-Â£ ALLEY SCALE SET 1 INCH = 10 FEET - CDR AP WD-W S75005 BLOCAÂ» 42 SET SP' AP SHED L 0 5 10 15 20 '0049 ND~. TRASH i VIR# ED '019 90 sO SHED AP S ED (2 7599,113Â£....90,2> p\* - *P SHED \ LOT Stif-n AP . BOXES NORjm- PAVEMENT 'Â· 1PR CE N AP SHE , 2 'SHED E 22 P~CE N I , l l 1 13 1 -0 , l LOT ,/2 / Â·l l : 6 , l l 1 1 0 --- P Cd 28.2 :' PATIO 12 / e 29>I , -- LOT 0 4.'.--%% LEGEND & NOTES i i *el A F O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR \2 TH CAP AS NOTED e SPI KE OR P-K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL L J l -/,7 4 f 3.3, e | . h 2 STORY ) 1 1 POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 IEST HALLAM ST, ' VICTORIAN WOOD FRAME - ' -8- WOOD FENCE i 4 - M RE FENCE ........: MAJ-436' LA* HOUSE m UTI LI TY BOX / 40 33' 5,05 ~~ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER i râ€¢$ 20 ClÂ¥~NE: 5999' 1 1411. Â¢60,00 <3000' -- CITY MONUMENT ' / SET CORNER NO, 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 11-8-02 42 '320' i* LOT 3.6 N AP FL 1 + D. 1 Q 0' / , TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BYi PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, (375009 COMMITMENT NO, PCT-17086L '11'ED 10 1 AP HSE q'' Â£6 , ~ . DATED JUNE 27,2002 BASIS OF BEARINGS PIN , 89.99'"MEAS AP WD , 9.65' 4 12.4, / ~ CA 1 (90.00') 44 qi ; 6 . ~~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED AP BAY AP HS ~ a Â· 6,8, , I 2 ' AP BAY ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED iff ; AP CON ' 1 /4- l' i CONC. CURB & GUTTER YEL CAP Â· ' ~Â· $ 7 f L.- 9184 . 7. l AP WALK ~ '~ 0 ' CALLS IN C ) ARE RECORD FROM THE 1959 OFFICAL MAP OF THE 7 p' CITY OF ASPEN, 1 1 4 . YPC M ' ' WDF 1 01 , , '1 -9 - k.../ , ED WALK P , E 9.99 ' PeiIA 28. MEAS, HEAS. 28 Cl'~W~,*; (90.00') (N 75009'11'W) 8 PI* i BOC 31 WATER VAL.V~ SET ' WATER AP FL 3 - VALVE 28' 28 C RED CAP 9018 SE CONC WALK E STONE WALL le AP STONE WALL IMPROVEMENT SURVEY ./Un.KLE WEST M~' CL WALK BOC 41 L.44 ' - BOC LOTS N, 0, & P, BLOCK 42, 14 CI TY & TOW4SI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION 210 S, GALENA STREET BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT \6 THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FI RST DI SCOYERED SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED PHONE/FAX (970> 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS E-MAIL dave@aspenlnfo.com 21 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTI FI CATI ON SHOWN HEREON, Job no. 32155 NOV: 25, 2002 c SHEET 2 OF 2 k \ 9~'E MEAS. 43.2' Sat Mar 22 14: 27: 30 2003 4%'fll t -17'NÂ» ROOFLINE ABOVE design collaborative, llc. skalko . haas 1 1 320 oak lane | aspen colorado 81611 ~ phone (970). 309.0695 9 1 4 1 ~~D ~Â· . fa x (970) . 920. 7822 4 91 1 ENTRY 0 1 2 / h e-mail KITCHEN BEDROOM N ~ derek@studlobarchitects.net .i: O 1-*--7 .1 -1 O , m Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 9 4 1 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. e THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF - -- ILIÂ»LIÂ«=29+1 THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN Z. E-. COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, -- -~ ~ COPYRIGHT 2003 -- ---- -i------lippi -- LIVING AREA - OFFICE I 1.1*El s fal 1 1 N 1 1 ROOFLINE ABOVE TAJE PROJEOT NORTH ARROM NORTH ARROM / 1 1 EXISTING PLAN - PANABODE (33 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) (53 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION A-HIS-SCALEF-1/4"-Â«0" 05/R \0-HIS~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 423/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTHI ROOFLINE ABOVE 1 11 1 11 1 1 / 1 4 7 < 5/ 1 1 1 /12~1 m E-77173 o Eli 31 1 #JL, 1 ROOFLINE ABOVE 1Rev. ~ Construction Issue date: Drawing Title: EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUE PRO.ECT (21 EXISTING ROOF PLAN - PANABODE NORTH ARROW NORTH AMOM c41 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) c6-1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 320 HALLAM STREET A-HIS SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" [PPEK-1 \A-HIS/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" \0-HIâ‚¬/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" Sheet#: *1 A-HIS eouep!sebl seeH Xpnr Fri Mar 21 19: 09: 45 2003 /--0 r 09 1 \tls' U F d | al' , 5'-3" y . I I *... design collaborative, llc. L alfr MELL MITH *MATING OV~ I I skalko haes 320 oak lane r--------7 aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309.0695 -- 1 nâ‚¬. .8 n 1 1 E------7 I oPPANA=-ABOVE rb .2 . EXISTINe MOO,PRINT -- ... 1011 ==7 derek@studiobarchltects.net 21 :: fa x (970) . 920. 7822 / 1 1 Â£ -11 1 ie R , 7" = IO'-6 1/2" 11 1 \ r / l IZ - - ST#dk , 1. \/ MECHANICAL ' ' 15 - 0 111 AA Â»f n Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 12 ..0 1 20, 2 1 . ~1 - M.1 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. I c Â·'~ 1.- i . 11 1 6-----7 -' , VI ~~ THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 1 ' CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE L ' i 1 PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN i I BEDROOM ~ ~ _ ~ ~ , , i i : ~ 2 THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 Gail DEN -_ __ _ ~ , Â· COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF - . . ..L , , ~ , PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 'r r 1 â‚¬ - -4 Â£ COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY 1 11 1 r_ - DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL O i.. R .i 1 1 01 RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY /633\ \ R i ' ~ . AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 . 1 8. EiN-EM It,%.â‚¬4 F.L: Â·335 20 ----7 Â£. - -1.. 9 0 2% ft -11- -Il C (204 ., _ 0 ~ GCNECTINS HALL ON P- POUNPATIONB A,OVE ~ ~ MECHANICAL r ' BATH CLOSET 2/ 15 7 .Â· a~ u ' I-33@ 70 2 314 I k 0 1 0 . L -~. . (F) - 1 05 . Iii) EXISTING FOOâ„¢RINT OP FAN ABODE ANVE 3 01 LI Lr L, 4 / r 0.1 -Au ' , 21'-4" 1462" ' ' , , 15'-10" * 4 3' 12' 22' | 1 1 ' 0, I . . 80' 11' 97' ' . I (D I ' I L 1 76' 1 1 1 ~E - 1, E E L f 1 3 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN m ~2.~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1 '.0" 1 I 41174 #M C 0 1 (DD k J 94.7 \211 21' -1 9 + e 9 0 6 0 30' , It' , 37' * I * 1 61.4. , 4'-8~" 9, ,P ,2 2 '1 . 11 2 4 r, a'-5111 , 4'-2~" ~2'-10 1 " 2'-5~" 1,-21 ':i~~11 3'-09" 1'-5" ,2'-2" , 111-8. 11 Â¢ 1 . . R.0. , R.O. , RO ' , , p.0. ' '' 9.20 ' I i R.O. iffi-YX< 044-*49] 761 3 1I;...h-1 1/1 .... ..1,Â·1 ,â€¢ n. 1, 1-Â· 1%.ha 1-1./ .- :t- ...171; 1 MIll- 1 e e e 1 .4 6 %% 79 -71 r QUANTUM MOLDINS TRACK ~--Â·- ,Â«/Â».Â«.geÂ»,49,4 Â·t; )7,4- /.57,9-'.4'xvovun', '>'/,t/>>16-" ''.Â«~ j ~ ExisTINe :-: 21__~61*40 7----7~7----f~ C e 1.1 - \110 0 12-7, /n pki' _2,h ~,42 2 .'I .i'~Â·iÂ·. i -;6 â€¢: i j.' i : .:'. :'Z' rpt!,m 17----[Ir---Ils[.J le[:. d 151,-----flud 3 i~72 -~ Eli- 7F -llf,7F,l'7<-]Ir - -r - ,'' A - / 36. 1 ENTrr Illf-\1/-4- -JIL- i --j- TOILET ~~2 ~BATH / 13 TIA' 3 E. 0Â©= ~ ~Â© 1 $: 5TYL ZI 11 / 18 1 . + ! 4 il... 1 - 1 . f lial N:F~,C El? .N, 1.1.,~.; :il. 1 11 1 1 -9- US&4 CLOSET -- It i i -Â·= , n 11 al r LIt/INe AREA KITCHEN 1, IIi /1 / 1 0 - ey I rim 2'n St fi.1.1,11'f~ :3,l mA* 4 11 /12\ lili -lei A--_--45 --------------- 1- d ' ~.2.J,Â·.2 {'4-GE. ~ ITia--1 i! ~ 1 rm-1 1 . 9 2 T - - -1 -- 1 6 1~ /-7 19:)'.Â·.,-,rJ-&73 1~ji 1% - 4 --A--- mcixv- 7 ---_-_ 1! 1 1 11 1 .1 < 40 -/ D 11.-1.1 40 - - . 9 t.z) i -A.#ab# 9 0 COURTYARD , e. r r[T --7--It- -30.2...11- ---- t_---((-7 1 1 91** . '=7-~~~~=Â©:=-=~j . VANIT~ 1"91 1 1 1 : 1 1 /----% -- C)(D 1 1 . R . 11 Â£ \ .. 1 i Ah 1 0 9--- 1 1....--â€ž...---......... .....--......j % 3 -47--00--1----r-%---1---4357--1-10 1,8 k rl 3 - -3 5.11 1 el KAL-MAL SKYLIGHT ABOVE # TCHEN ISLANb f-TO _ ~F . -rl 1 0?Apom 1 GATHERINe AREA 1 /ish 1 m I . 9 L________--------- . Â©4 19'' 12 3 il~ 1 061 1 E-~\ -Sh lEil ----- -L-- --- - - -- ----1 - ~Â·22-2'Â·227 02.J_- -1 22 - 72-' tq I ..trâ€ž-2 1 -':.1.... d 4.tga , Â· W T . MUD AREA ' \< / i DN _ -2 --1 --- ---------------- 9---1101 BRIDGE 111 1 DININe AREA Rii-1 ~ liu I -1 11 RA /HALL i 113*-1 111 r.0-7 i 1 1"2*1 -1.1 cii@h Â· 0 1 lili | C \ 11 1 [iWI I I MASH DRY REF & L - - 3 c --J --- -il ---- \ 11 / 1 Â® 1 ...,,,. -, - ir--111--11-ir'----n->467,34 + , 2,1 f .1 - m 'Mn.72:*3'.6,4~~..'.x...4.y..v.*........177 0 1 :-*, 11---~-1- -1.-'. BUILT IN 8001<spe.VE - 0 I e W 9.-1 111 111 111 111 111 1 -4 1 Construction 0 47 5 1 issue date: 6/ 15'-6" 3'-5~ 0,_qâ€ž Drawing Title: 6'-6" 2'-3" , 3' il -1 2'-66" 2'-â‚¬" 6/ 11-66,1 / 4 223 ; 45 PROPOSED PLANS Ill , , 4 ' ' RO. 0 , R.0. R.O. R.O. 1 96" 52" 320 HALLAM STREET 11' 6 50' , ,:15 , 22' .... Sheet #: 78 co in g 111 (~I) (23 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN L' 430/ 48/ 43/ ~2-.~ SCALE: 1/4" = 1'.0,1 Z~00,~ 1 7 3 *711 eouep! pLIEI JseM - uedsv Jo *1!3 Thu Jun 12 00: 59: 55 2 f Be r Go Dp r A4.1 A4.1 A4.1 9 9 1 99 0 9 9 1*2 1 d design collaborative, llc. skalke hoas 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 FLUE FOR eAS FIR~PLACE phone(970).309.0695 fa x (970) . 920. 7822 - - - - -- --- EXISTING e-mail _ _ - - ~~ derek@studiobarchitects.net P- -7 S AN IN SE M T OFI 6 ITH - P E L GE XI TIN TREE IMI A PUT ~ Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN jÂ«Ut_ILLi_ALL EXPOSED B K al COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 1 CEDAR FRAMING Fv 11 1 1 1 1 1 Irl, PANELIND TO 82 APPLIED THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT | | <Mi | THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR Ip i IL OVER TOF' CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF 1~'~ COPIED WITHOUTTHE PRIORWRITTEN 1 11:AL-"'IL 31<1~'SHT ~ ~ / rh COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN [Â«LEEE[liLi --~/ DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY CEDAR SHINGLES COPYRIGHT 2003 RIDGE VENT 1 1 KAL--eL SKYÂ¢IGHT 1 (Â» -- SRI GE TO IE TO EXI TIN 11[ELLLULLULL ---I -- RO O 2 - 1 /-4) 1 4 4 4 1 4 41 , 1 PROPOSED OOF PLAN A2.2 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" L/ 4. LE- I (33 11 E-i gi# Construction Rev. ~ 1 - issue date: Drawing Title: PROPOSED ROOF PLAN & CONTEXT ELEVATION Sheet #: m 0 (21 PROPOSED CONTEXT ELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET ~\2.2/ SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0" A-2.2 puE' jseM - uedsÂ¥ Jo *1!0 2NUZZL 9 4 ' Thu Jun 12 01: 01: 05 ' f Il f f f T f f d a - 1 1 design collaborative, llc. 1 skalko ha 8 5 - A T.O. KALÂ·ztek~SKYLISHT 320 oak lane ~ (APPROX) aspen colorado 81611 M i T.O. RIDGE BEAM phone(970).309.0695 a.15 M - 1(AL-W 511IGHF 5 5TEM ELEV.Ile'f"(APPROX.) fa x (970). 920. 7822 e-mail derek@studiobarchitects.net Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 1 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 1 1 T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF 1 T.O. PLATE PININS BUMP-OUT THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 T.O. PLATE BRIPSE LOW PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN l ili 1111 11,1 lili 1 111 .11 - E-iÂ©*FION511[E f FANELIN 99[EM J COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL 1 61.5T0M WOMp MLLLEP UNITI CUSIDM 02 MILLE 4 * r~l KFA RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 02 L. \JL. \-4 ICAL- AL 33 la-W PANE ING ' | l' i PANELI G 5Y5 M 1 T.O. PLAD. MAIN LEVEL 1 / 1 1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION - ADDITION N SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ~ I ~ 11 C 0 1 T.O. GONG. LOMER LEVEL 8' cv '8 /7 - - ELEV. 119'-6" (APPROXJ - 6 T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLISHT aeroM - -NAL 51<1 6Hr 5Y51EM A T.O. RIDGE BEAM 7 ELEV. 118'-1" (APPROX.) Â· 6 T.O. PLATE PORCH GUTBAGK -1]~- ~~1~~1-1111]~ 1 -1 ---- ELEV.115waVe" =16 y ' 2 I il: aBTOM - KPL-WPL 5111Â£}tr 5*EM AN ; T.O. FLATE-MAIN SABLE 1 T.O. PLATE BRIDGE HleH lililp lilli 11 11 72[EV. log'-3" = 1 RB~ P-7----T--1 0 ,Illi iii ~ 1 ;; 111' t"I' !' Iri; i f 5 1 113 0 1 Iii i,i, 1 529-FI 2529-Fl 117191131. E 1 1 / C ~W 3 Pl 0 292 1 4 V,IF 1~ h / liN 1 1 | OWNWM C * 1 QUANTUM ( ?f) 1 1 lark |Il "1 \ PANEL 1 1FOLPINQ 1 1 1 J 403 Il I < FOLPING | 96 -4 1 1 RACK po* 1 1 1 5101?EFF , 1 13trod 1 1 1-Â»EI1Lhz=LLE=zil 5Â¥5TEM i ------------ ------------------- ----- 1 ' 1 T.O. FLAP. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIDGE -----------------1--1 r ----------rt----------1-3 1 91Â¥ZE==7 'IKEEEE~~ | 1 11 1 4 9 111 /9/111 2 1 Ill\\9<<1 ~ 9 4,+T ! NÂ« NEÂ«*i 'M iM fl Aill'Ipx 111 01'U ./lilli 1 1 1 Rev. 1 111 11 6,00-24 111 lili / lilli I 1 12~ ' construction issue date: A T.0._CONG. LIGHTMELL BASE - 11 Drawing Title: w ADDITION ELEVATIONS ID.CONG.LOPVER LEVEL 7 ELEV. aq'-4" 320 HALLAM STREET Sheet #: c21 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 E37-Â§8*LE:1/4"=1'-0" - ADD PUB 332 40 Thu Jun 12 00: 51: 20 2003 /6 Lf Ap 1*07 Ill -D d PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe FLUE a PROPOSE TO ADD SKYLIeHT TO ROOF 1 y -1---- 1 - ELEV.li4~b"(APPROXJ design collaborative, llc. PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe ROOF --2...... 1 T.O. KALANAL 51<Â¥LISHT 1 T.O. RIDGE BEAM PROPOSE TO IMPROVE EXISTING FASCIA skalko haas 320 oak lane | - - 4-- -mIEV.8-e-172" T.O. PLATE PORCH OUTBACK aspen colorado 81611 phone (970).309.0695 10~ f a x (970) 920. 7822 11 - 02.1 PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe WINDOW LOCATION AND SIZINe MITH UPelEADED e-mail 2929-FIX ~~ I , I, Â® LL' ~ 11 ~ CLAD OR kNOOD WINDOWS Err MAUFACTURER derek@studiobarchltects.net TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PATTERN TO MATCH EXISTINe CONDITIONS 12929-FIX I Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe STAIRS COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. _ * T.O. PLATE MAIN SABLE 'WITH MORE APPROPRIATE HISTORIC SOLUTION ELEV. log'-3" THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 6 T.O. PLATE PININe BUMP-OUT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 7 7113-1 1 -- ...1....i- .4 1,19?i, eâ‚¬.9.1..1 ..1/~ ...1 Z.'il Â·: PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR O COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 12920-FIX I Â£ PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN (31 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALLAM ST. FACADE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY - DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. SHALL 1/ \1 KE,2-EACE:1/4"-aÂ¥ RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYRIGHT 2003 A T.O. PLWO. MAIN LEVEL 9 ELEV. 100'-O" 01--------- ---------------1--1 11 - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTING FLUE 11 11 -- PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTING ROOF 11 11 1 11 ~1 11 11 11 I u l,-Â·~ Tifi F r' 1 -11 11 1-711.-;1 1-L 1. -1 f It $--1 i.14 1 1,1 I.- -i ..]i 1:-,;J~ PROPOSE TOIMPROVE EXISTING FASCIA '' jO-,-,I ' Â·-1,1 f, 1.1 Â·il.yi-Â·-1 4--- r. J 1 --11 11-3 -1! 1 4 -3..53 r_.04r?5NF~.Fl 11 1 11 1 T.O. CONG. LIeHTMELL BASE Er=2-3 ~ rn i , d L lid Nizzl T~=7=1 1--ZE'~Snff<Me,p--------==113~ PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTING VVINDON LOCATION AND SIZINe WITH UpeRADED CLAD OR PNOOD MINDOWS Err, MAUFACTURER L L = 2 = = = = r == = z z z u z ---- --- El*1 ~prRE=,TiWEii-11 # 6 T.O. CONG. LOMER LEVEL 1 1 TO BE DETERMINED MULLION PATTERN TO Ft-il-F- MATCH EXISTINS CONDITIONS PROPOSE TO REF:INISH PAN-ABODE STAIN /1 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION /41 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" f f - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTINe GLAD WINDOW AND CONNECT PAN-ABODE TO NEW ADDITION 1 19 - MITH 1'-0" (INTERIOR DIMENSION AT LOPI Sit>8 1 T.O. KAL-FIAL SKYLIGHT CONNECTION ELEMENT. CONNECTOR PIECE TO TIE 1 499 - ELEV.IM<-6"(APPROX.) INTO EXISTINe PAN-ABODE ROOF CONDITION DUE TO BUILDINS CODE +EleHT MINIMUMS 4 FOR LEAST 1 T.0. RIPSE BEAM F~~-tm=u-N- AMOUNT OF IMPACT TO PENDINe ICE BUILDUP ELEV.*IBE*'APPROX.) -J CONDITIONS TO EXISTINe STRUCTURE IF LOWERED Â®1~ ~1 i '' [lu*~Â·-i 1 11 1 2 ~,11~L.*Â»Izt~ %'IUE~~T~~GE~GYR~~S~RABSOL~LO*GZN~ 12 Mt-1 1. LU--1, 4 1 Ul-11 f- --t--2-'I | hlk -1-Ini#~11 - -51-0Â·-=~~71[ 11111 - -i-4 233 REPLACE EXISTINe MINDOht MITH LARSER WINDOW C OM FIXE 1 1 1 1-1 -- STYLE OF ANDON TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH ALL MINPONS TO BE REPLACED 1 TO. PLATE MAIN SABLE 12*a====E=:MJEEL-----~ - - - 1 T.O. PLATE PININS BUMP-OUT A T.o. PLATE BRIPSE HISH ELEY'khyL819411 403 | & T.O. PLATE BRIDSE LOW 5(OREFRONT ELâ‚¬99\0*-0" - (51 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACAD E 5Â¥5TEM SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 CUOTOM FIRE,11 5 ~~tl < 1.) 1 T.O. PLMID. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPSE __~ZIZ~ PROPOSE TO ADD StÂ©(LleHT TO ROOF - PROPOSE TO REMOVE EXISTING FLUE 1 1 rl--------------- ---------1-1 11 11 11 - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINS ROOF 11 11 11 1 '' '' '' I- A'-- i 11 11 11 I | | I I | ~Revq ~ Construction PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTINe MINDOW issue date: 1 T.O. GONG. LieHTFVELL BASE LE=ZE 11 - - ELEVmVO' FRJ~ 111.-~ 11 - 1,1 1~b~ec______++1 Drawing Title: - LOCATION AND SIZINe WITH UPeRAIPED - CLAD OR MOOD MINDOMIS BY MAUFACTURER ADDITION ELEVATIONS 1 T.O. CONG. LOKER LEVEL LL==L==Ii.,=IRRA TO BE DETERMINED 20 HALLAM TREET PROPOSE TO REFINISH PAN-ABODE STAIN Sheet #: /23 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION - A-3.2 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" c61 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ADD 3333~6Â° 61' R.O. RiO. 2944" Thu Jun 12 00: 55: 23 2003 design collaborative, llc. skalko haas 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309.0695 i T.O. KAL-MAL SKYLIÂ®HT f a x (970) . 920. 7822 - V ELEV. lial'-6" (APPROX) e-mail 1 1 .. . A T.O. RIIÂ»E BEAM derek@studiobarchitects.net I ,L ~ I 7 ELEV. I IE~-4" (APPROX) 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 . 00 Â° Â°Â° o ~ COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 0 0 00 . 0. . 00 0 CO 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 1 1 PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS 4 HEISHTS FOR - PAN-ABODE SECTIONS TO BE VERIFIED ~ ~ oo 0 0 00 . 0 00 0 0 00 0 COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR IN FIELD BÂ¥ CONTRACTOR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN â€¢k T.o. PLATE MAIN SABLE PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 9 ELEV, 104'-3" COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY A T.o. PLATE DINING BUMP-OUT 1 1 1 . 3, 11 11 1 1 1111 1 11 11-40 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 . 00 . 60 Â° Â° Â° DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. SHALL 4 - 1 ELEV. 1081-8,1 RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY - 00 -1 E il 4% lA T.O. PLATE BRIPSE HISH AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, \ 1 7 ELEV, 10,0'-6 3/4" COPYRIGHT 2003 7 4 \ \ , 1 / 1~ LIv Ne ARE.4 ~i KITCHEN \ 3 i - \ E \ 1.Tj@3 \ GATHERING AREA * x Uj ' Â®21 IFEE -1 BRIPSE STAIR MUI:;> > ~ rian i / VANITY == -i BATH G*D . 231 Il I[ 11 - 1--aaa ~ - if \ 9 EP. 1 \ Fi331 ~ I-EX-1 2 / / %1 LLUL=J / 1.4 / f \ 1 1 1 / \ 1- 9 1 , 0 40:1 --2--f- 2 == - f E I I A .11 , 1 i. 11 -___*i I 4 4 [i I~L I ( ~~2~ 1 1 I , . I .III I I II Â£ 1111 2 - El V ELEV. 100'-0â€ž ir5 ,+.. 6~lia~ 41~~~9~1~* â€¢.Aâ€¢1#~ 1A.~?I;~ -'liq-7 0:4.' :*wâ€¢,m.: .mm #~*--f e* â€¢*AMAm-# Â¢44 V il; -* *I~~~~Ma.91 -/ Wed'i â„¢21i .Â»a*Â·A:%4.*- a,-M 9- .*Â¥â€žIm - gÂ¢-9*-01MwjfÂ¢l' -*~m- WNâ€¢* -Â·W.-~#MA,m-~MÂ¢ 40#MN - 01, T.O. PLPe. MAIN LEVEL 1 1 E 7:-c.--..1 1 .â‚¬, 15 11 M I 11 1 1 1- - m ,< 1 \\ /11 1 \ / 11 1 \ BEDROOM > DEN \ 11 1 / 1 ~ .11 1 [3311 1 24 1 . 1 11 1 1 11 1 f 1 3 LONG AXIS SECTION: AA (ENTIRE PROJECT) i 11 1 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0"" w I r-j-1--1-1 1 - 6 T,O, CONG. LaiNER LEVEL 1 ELEV. acr-q" 43 41-3 421~-3 1 1 - - 6 T.O. KALÂ«IAL SKYLISHT 7 ELEV. 114'-6"(APPROX) -1 - 2,/ /N \ A T.O. RIDGE BEAM (i) (f) (f) /A\ 7 ELEV. 118'Â·-9"(APPROX) 12 A:1 I+~ 1 12 %14.Im~ 107 l %1[. 11 111!4 N, 11. 1."L NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS 4 HeleHTS FOR ~ ~ ~~~f .70,>P, 4illili,X PAN-ABOPE SECTIONS TO BE VERIFIED NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS 4 HEIGHTS FOR | IN FIELD BY CONTRACTOR | PAN-ABODE SECTIONS 4 LINK BETREEN /1 ./ 14 4 TIE INTO EXISTINe NEW CONSTRUCTION Â¢ EXISTINS CONDITIONS , TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD BY CONTRACTOR j V 7 ELEV. 10Â¢1'-3" A T.o. PLATE MAIN eABLE * T.O. PLATE DINING BUMP-OUT ELEV. 108'-9" A T.o. PLATE BRIDGE HISH - ------1-iII"1 0 T.0. PLATE PAN ABODE 7 ELEV. 108'-8 5/4" (V.I.FJ KITCHEN MUD 1 ' I .-I 9 ELEV. 107'-2" (V.I.F.) ; T.o. PLATE BRIDGE LOW \OPEN TO HALL/#2. f ELEV. loS'-0.6/.1.F,) I [Im] 0*3 -1-,i 1. t 11- A 3 BR+E 1 ==11 ~ #* CLOSET eATHERING AREA \ 0 . _LI T- RER- i: . E ff f J TO. PLÂ»IP. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPeE - 1- 1 \ fit 6 T.O. PLAD. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIDGE ~ ~ ~. â€¢k T.o. PLAD. PAN ABODE 7 --- - 7 ELEV. 100'-O" 49 9 ELEV. 1001-0' r U. -- - 7 ELEV. IOO'-7" (V.I.F.) - 5-4,9Â·.f:99?44 -2 I Â£-- 3 401 ~~>'.~ Ela - STAIR -- rz- ~ NOTE: FOUNDATION 4 GRAAL SPACE EXISTING F--1 11 :- I MAY REPLACE FOUNDATION 4 FLOOR FOR 5" |-- 2 1332 RADIANT FLOORPACK TO BE DETERMINED I 1 _ Rev. UPON PISCUSSION E El*INEER ~ I fr | BEPROOM * CLOSET 7 Construction 2% n = =f I [*3 ./. issue date: A T.o. CONC,- LIGHTMELL BASE 7 ELEV. 41'-10" Drawing Title: - BUILDING SECTIONS - 6 T.O. CONG. LOKER LEVEL 7 ELEV. 84'Â·-q" 320 HALLAM STREET Lj i Sheet #: (21 CROSS SECTION: BB (PAN ABODE) (33 CROSS SECTION: CC (BRIDGE) (41 CROSS SECTION: DD (ADDITION) A-4.1 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" \419 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0. \411-/ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" pLIEI jseAA - uedsv Jo X1!3 eouel)!seH seeH Xpnr 138#S luelleH 01Â£ ke#*Ne' A*41*a,6./ *-*4/:*' ' Thu Jun 12 00: 57: 37 2003 t i SPECIAL CASE CUSTOM MINDOWS - SCALE 1/4" = 1'-O" JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 NEST HALLAM BTREET MINDOM SCHEDULE SYMBOL ROUeH OPENINe EAD HEIeHT FRO DETAILS 1-Â¥PE MANUFACTURER MODEL NOTES T.O. PLAP. PER design collaborative, llc. AXH SITUATED FLOOR JAMB SILL HEAD NUMBER (410 (110 "alko haas 320 oak lane 21-63" 101-4611 4-1 2'-11 9/4" x 5'-5 3/4 8'-0" FROM T.O. F . LOW R LV . CLAD UNIT - CASEMENT PELLA 3565- CASEME aspen colorado 81611 phone(970).309.0695 11 12 11 A-2 2'-11 3/4" x 5'-5 5/4" B'-O" FROM T.O. F . LOPN R LV . CLAD UNIT - CASEMENT PELLA 3565 - CASEME fa x (970). 920 7822 4 ~/2" 41/2" 4193" i - '4 6' 8 2,5 3/4" x 2'-5 3/4' 5'-5" FROM T.O. P PNP. M INA .LVL. GLAD UNIT - FIXED PELLA 2Â¢124- FIXED derek@studiobarchitects.net 11--'El' 44:1 e-mail 0 4'-2 3/4" x 4'-2 8/4" 8'-3" FROM T.O. P MIP, M IN A , 1-VL. CLAD MULLED UNIT - (2) FIXED/ (2) ANING PELLA (4)-2525 (2) 2525 FIXED 4 (2) 2525 AANING: SEE ELEVS I t al-L------=1- 1 0 2'-6 3/4" x q'-O" 61'-3" FROM T.O. P FND. M IN AD . LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO DRAMINS: A-10.1 EFCO CUSTOM-MULLED AIO.1 - EFCO 403 SERIES - ANODIZED ALUM. FIN H -7- 1 E 10'-4 1/2" x 01'-0' 61'-3" FROM T.O. P AD. M IN AD . LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO PRAININe: A-10.1 EFOO GUSTOM-MULLED AIO.1 - EFCO 403 SERIES - ANODIZED ALUM. FIN H COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. Â© 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN M I {1 1= 111, \1111, 'Jh 1 2% d 11 F TRIANSLE: AIO.1 BOTTOM OF FRAM Ne RI E J ISTS. GLAD UNIT - FIXED PROFILLIT CUSTOM-CHANNE REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 3'-q" FROM T.O. P AP. M IN AD . LVL. CLAP UNIT - FIXED PELLA CUSTOM SLAZINe TO BE COMPATABLE PV SAS APPLIANG PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN ' ~ ' "1/,\111 1JEPLAGE ~~ ~ ~ COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF 1 6 *=[lul Iii 1 704Â«:Il 1 ..31/4/I 14=11 H 6'-0" x 6'-1" -1'-5 " FROM T.O. P FO. B IDeE VL. KAL-INAL PANELINe SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KAL-MAL LAYOUT THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 8'-3" FROM T.O. P ND. M INA .LVL. KAL-MAL PANELINe SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO Alo.1 FOR KAL-INAL LAYOUT PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. ONE FRIDAY 3 21* Ld~''L DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. SHALL J Ill-0. x I'-O" q'-3" FROM T.O. P FO. M IN AD . LVL. KAL-INAL PANELINe 9Â¥BTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO AID.1 FOR KAL-MAL LAYOUT RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, K 2'-5 3/4" x 12'-1 3/4" I5'-3" FROM T.O. P AID. M IN A D. LVL. GLAD MULLED UNIT - (4) FIXED/ (1) A NING PELLA (5)-2424 (4) 2424 FIXED 4 (1) 25129 AMNINe: SEE ELEVS COPYRIGHT 2003 ASSEMBLY-CUSTOM ROUSH OPENINeS TO BE V. I. F. L 6'-3 3/4" x 2'-1 5/4" 10'-3" FROM T.O. 013. M IN A p. LVL. GLAD MULLED UNIT - (5) FIXED PELLA (3)-2525 (3) 2525 FIXED: SEE ELEVATIONS M 4'-0" x lq'-Oil SKYLIGHT LOCAT AS I DICA D ON LAN KAL-MAL PANELINe SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS Â¢ ELEVATIÂ¢DNS FOR LAYOUT V..F. 6' R.O. R.O. WHI Â¢-f PAN-A -1'-10" x 4'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E 1/4003 MULLED UNIT - FIXED/ AANIN PELLA CUSTOM - INOOP REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) 61 11 1 1 1-11 of PAN-B 5'-3" x 4'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - FIXED/ AANIN PELLA CUSTOM - INOOP REFER TO Alo.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V.I.F.) 0 PAN-C 4'-2" x 2'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA CUSTOM-MOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V.I.F.) 4' I KAI-Â»644 1 1 E PAN-D 5'-10 3/4" x 5'-6 7/8" 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E WOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA (2)-3565 (2) 3565 MULLEP WOOD CASEMENT - SEE ELEVS 11 PANELIN* 1 11 PAN-E 2'-2" x 2'-2" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E MOOD CUSTOM UNIT - AANING PELLA CUSTOM - INOOD REFER TO Alo.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-F 4'-q" x 2'-10" (V.I.F.) 6'-10" FROM T.O. .F. PAN ABO E WOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) EASEMENT PELLA CUSTOM - WOOD REFER TO Alo.1 FOR LAÂ¥OUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-6 82-62' x 2'-6" SKYLIeHT LOCAT AS I PICA D ON LAN KAL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS 4 ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT V..F. KAL-MAL TRANSLUGENT PANELINe SYSTEM 41 1 12-1> 1 1 13%%> 41 1 1 1 -i l 1 1 1% JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 REST HALLAM STREET DOOR SCHEDULE SYMBOL ROUGH OPENING HEAD THICKNESS LEAF DIMENSION MANUFACTURER HANOINe MODEL NOTES, MXH HEISHT HARDAARE MATERIAL STÂ¥LE IN X H NUMBER 7'-10" R.0. 5'-3" R.O. Ea Ea 002/A 3'-5" X 7'-1" 11-111 PASSAeE LUMIGITE CUSTOM T.B.P. 3'-4" X 7'-0" T.B.P. RH CUSTOM: LUMICITE INTERIOR PIVOT POINT POOR ~ ~~ fANÂ·~~ 002/8 2'-10" X -1'-1" 7'-1" PASSAeE MAPLE SOLID 1 9/4" 2'-8" >< 7'-O" T.B.D. LH 99 [79-1 003/3 2'-6" X 1'-1" -71-11' PASSAGE SLAZINe EURO-eL S T.B.D. 2'-5" X -1'-O" T.B.D. RH CUSTOM: EURO eLASS SHORIER DOOR il {114411 005/A 2'-10" X 7-1" 7'-1" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4" 2'-8" X -1'-0' T.B.P. LH ~1.*ININe]~IÂ»ININS]QLAWNIN*~ 4----4'elademmil 005/A 3'-2" X 7-1" 71-111 SECURITY MAPLE SOLIP 13/4" 3'-O' X 7'-O" T.B.D. RH CHECK FOR FIRE RATINe REQUIREMENTS 2'-2" R.O. 101/A 3'-0 3/4" X -71-111 -11-111 PASSASE CLAD FRENCH 1 7/8," 3'-0" X 6'-10" PELLA RH 3682 PELLA GLAD FRENCH DOOR MITH eLAZING 41-2" R.O 102/A 2'-10" X 7'-9" 7'-5" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 13/4" 2'-B" X 7'-O" T.B.P. 4'Â·-q" R.O. LH ; Ea , Ea 1 -'Ea Eal 1. EG EG 1 102/B 2'-10" X 7'-5" 7'-9" PASSASE MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4" 2'-8" X 7'-011 T.B.P. SLIPIN INTERIOR SLIDINe TRACK DOOR CIAN 1 \\1 511 11/ '*11 109/A 2'-6" X -7'-3" 1,-3" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 13/4" 2'-6" X 7'-0" T.B.D. SLIDI POCKET INTERIOR SLIDING POCKET POOR 4 1 11/ 111 edi .' m '. 104/A 2'-10" X 7'-1" 7'-1" PASSASE SLAZING EURO-eL ST.B.D. 2'-q" X 7'-oIl T.B.D. RH CUSTOM: EURO GLASS SHOPiER DOOR 106/A 2'-8" X 7'-9" 7'-5" PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 9/4" 2'-6" X 71-0 T.B.P. SLIPIN INTERIOR SLIPINe TRACK POOR log/A q'-O" X -7'-3 7'-8" SECURITY MAPLE FRENCH T.B.D. (3) 3'-O" X 7'-0" QUANTUM FOLDI 6 TRACK QUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDINe TRACK NOTE: ALL EXISTINS PAN-ABODE WINDOWS 110/A 51'-O" x e'-3. 8'-3" SECURITY MAPLE FRENCH T.B.D. (3) 3'-0. X 8'-0. QUANTUM FOLDI 6 TRACK QUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDINS TRACK TO BE REPLACED BÂ¥ SIZE AND MULLION LAYOUT AS INDICATED. ALL ROUGH OPENINeS 113/A 3'-O 3/4" X 8'-8" 61-3. SECURITY CLAD FRENCH I 7/8" 5'-O. X a'-OIl PELLA LH 36R6 EXTERIOR CLAD FRENCH DOOR MITH eLAZING TO BE VERIFIED BÂ¥ CONTRACTOR 4 WINDOW 113/B e'-O" X 7'-8" 1'-5" PASSAeE MAPLE SOLID 1 9/4' (2) 3'-0" X 7'-0" T.B.P. DOUB SLIDINe INTERIOR POUBLE SLIDINe T'RACK DOOR MANUFACTURER IN FIELD ~Rev. ~ Construction issue date: Drawin Title WINbow & DOOR /1 1 SPECIAL CONDITION WINDOWS (21 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET SCHEDULE \010.~ SCALE : NO REPRESENTATIVE SCALE Sheet#: - 10.1 eouep!sehl seeH Xpnr pu312:c I~'eildesH4OJI0J~.0 5' R.o. 4'_10" R.O. Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea 2'-10" Ro 4 .. CASE NUMBER HPC009-03 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-00221 CASE NAME Haas Residence Major Historic Conceptual Development PROJECT ADDRESS 320 W Hallam PLANNER Amy Guthrie/Katie Ertmer CASE TYPE Major Historic Conceptual Dev OWNER/APPLICANT Judy Haas REPRESENTATIVE Dereak Skalko-1 Friday, LLC DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION HPC RESO 17-2003 PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 11/22/04 BY D DRISCOLL .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 304 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 17, SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-00-222 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 304 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed - on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be created, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance 4.Gy with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 9,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 9,2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City o f Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Final) approval with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 486409 Ill li l li 1111111111 lillill lilli Page: 1 of 3 08/04/2003 11.50A n T ./. T rr , TY CO 2 1 8 00 D 0.00 .. 2. A sample of the roo f material, and details o f how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode is not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions o f approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 111111111111111111111111 Ill lilli 1111111111 lilli Iii lili 08/04/2003 11:50A 486409 Page: 2 of 3 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 0 0.00 .. 2. A sample o f the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode is not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter o f credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval o f staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. - 15. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. i Ullri 11\1%1 % wilmi % mi \'ii ill\ 08/04/2003 11:500 486409 Page: 2 of 3 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUN-Y CO R 16.00 D 0.00 .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July, 2003. Approved as to Form: -023 Davffl Hoefer, Assistant lity Attorney Approved as to content: HISTÂ»RIC PRE~R~ATION COMMISSION JeffhyÂ·.iIAferty, Ch:~ Kathy Stripkland, Chief Deputy Clerk 486409 Page: 3 of 3 08/04/2003 11:50A 1 ill'11111111111111 ill 11 ill'111 1~ lili lili lili SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00 0 . APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July, 2003. Approved as to Form: 0 2-4 ./ David Hoefer, Assistant tity Attorney Approved as to content: HISfO9C PRE~ER,VATION COMMISSION Jeffhh.H:Aferty, Cha~ --*FrT': .4 a,Â£*; JYJAdwiV,154 Kathy Stri,>Aland, Chief Deputy Clerk 486409 111111111111111111111111 illlillilll'Illill lilli lili lili 08/04/2003 11:50A Page: 3 of 3 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00 .. . *rs #1,1 k 4424 -4 /6/ - "7'r .1 VillillilliirKahy<%sill'll'll//Irfwrfri:..... ilizz.:..,1 17Â¥AV:'.I - ---- i V. 't. 1..' 1 I -/ Outside Light Fixture 304 West Hallam St Judy Haas 09 BILLADONNA BAILEY 9704349763 09/23/03 09:Slpm P. 001 :Der-LJ-to.u A fâ€¢ 14 ,< J 01 OU 8 6.61=MO 3 1 U ,%< 1 0..O r. ul / U. s RRv BUILDERS, INM 411 East Main Street, Suite #211 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Off: (970} 920-7919 Fax: (970) 920-7846 11'i. . . - f '~74\ -- - - W --- U= -- L_rnl n TO: Ms. Amy Guthrie 920-5096 FAX # 920-5439 RE: 320 West Hallam Owner Judy Haas FROM: Bob Witek Cell # (970) 379-7555 If you do not receive al! of the pages. Dlease call as soon as possible at (970) 920-7919 '*4< I.' Date: 9/24/03 Time: 8:00 AM Total pages including cover: REMARKS I just wanted to inform you that I have read the H.P.C. Resolutions anu understand them. I am enclosing a copy of the encroachment application explaining wi ,c, - we will be moving the house to. Bill Bailey House Moving will be installing 2 steel - beams the length of theÂ·house, raise the house and rolf the house to the curb on Hallam Street. Then the house will be protected wiu, plywood at the street and we will install red construction fencing around the house and the property lines as well as around the existing trees. Should you need further information please contact me at your earliest convenience. 1 44 Bill Bailey d TOTAL P.01 . Policy 204-4 City of Aspen Engineering Department Revocable Encroachment LICENSE REQUIREMENTS . > :*4, 0 - Â· T 0 M. Â· - - .....2-y'Â·';fÂ« . p . p h-:-Â· -Â· ,4Â·. Â·:~:lil --â‚¬Â·04 1 - .. .. - * - . Â·Â· '.i+99: Â· ~.44,0 REVISED: Ap,112003 f CIN,Â¢6â€¢pen- Engineering Department, 130 SouthÂ·Galena Strelt, Aspen Wor,60 81611 . Â· . /970-920Â·5080Â· -Â· 7 . - - - . i'- f Â· - 03760 RJW BUILDERS, INC. US BANK GENERAL ACCOUNT ASPEN, CO 81611 411 E MAIN ST SUITE 211 82-164/1021 254 ASPEN, CO 81611 9/4/2003 PAY TO THE ~ **330.00 ORDER OF City ofAspen Engineering Department ~- Three Hundred Thirly and 00/100************************************************************4******************69*16*.4 f.'t, "Ar9 LARS Q -- -4 z-1 6. 130 South Golena Street . -0-*0:. --, 5444-*s, r 9.". - V : - Aspen, Colorado 8161 [ - ---F 4 --fÂ·716Â·&921-'9Â· '-399 e.4,Â· t.:r.2?AED:f Â· â€¢ MEMO ..~4Â£9:t f:, Â·Â·Â·Â·*~ Â· b Â·Â·.- . Â·Â·Â· Â· -Â·.Â·- Â· Â· --t. 304 He Application Fee 1 - t . 4Â· 9.<i*Â«9669?604Â· 4-0 1016Â¥51~Â§12540â€¢32Â¥163â€¢.7?y RJW BUILDERS, INCJGENERAL ACCOUNT 09760 9/4/2003 City ofAspen Engineering Department 5570 Â· Licenses and permits . . 304 Hallam Application Fee - 330.00 I - . 4 --- ~-~~Â·$,I:,~.â‚¬;8\ 1/ .~:9* 4Â«1Â·,Ty..<.Â·<.iÂ·iÂ·3< Eli~ft~. 2: .'- t #Â· VIA'Â· Â· - US Bank . 304 Hallam Application Fee 330.00 . .. I - r .41 2136 1 44,2 -4 .:'.E)c2ULQ"<1.Â·36--~.,:62; hEÂ·,6Â·4.. - 3,<-- 1 - 9 - Â·. 47 -6.1, 40.-111.-0 ,.f,-d AU.-S, 0 - 0 09761 RJW BUILDERS, INC. US BANK GENERAL ACCOUNT ASPEN, CO 81611 411 E MAIN ST SUITE 211 82-164/1021 254 ASPEN, CO 81611 - 9/4/2003 PAY TO THE . ~ **812 50 ORDER OF City otAspen Engineering Department Eight Hundred Thirty-Two and 50/100 '1....11]11111|11|~''-~.-~-1-1- . Il l I l l I l LT.~ It.]1. ,-)LLARS ~ ,~4Â§Â·:-..".-:-Â·R~ki~> ,:'.:;j ~- 2 50-*.tÂ·4,Â·Â·Â·':- 4Â·Â·Â·1 . 2 . . City fAspen Engineering Department - ... p: 4*Â·4'EI i-:.42â‚¬4**&. 1 4 b ........ 2,1- /7.tr,tifi~4Will//4</.3~32.1 t: 130 56;th Galena Stred - .,12,> , .- .1.-. - 1, Gy-Â·.p# iÂ¢*#43*Â· i. t--,4 - -2~- -~~~fR.,---1 ?fr.'24 4,1#I&WH~fgjiM-4p&~,;12~ ~ ~ .;.Â·v.* e:~.- 4AC, â‚¬*S3tltâ€¢9'Â·Â·Â· Â·TÂ·. ~/-~ ~ ' : .. Â·. Aspen, Colorado 8 1611 *444*#4- MEMO. 3Â· 64F--9 304 Hallam 450 X 1.85 RENT e -Â·-4/1/-'M '.I<..D~:UZ.-- AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 6429%-2 1 _-~. .11242/1-u'00976 j&1.,.21: 10210 66450: .:j.1-25401-3 2:,7163â€¢*teÂ«;:414 4~~~91.~~~:~:4~15. 4 ( F : I-y.r -gjr*9134*~~ 4..:,SEâ‚¬Â·; I . % RJW BUILDERS, INCJGENERAL ACCOUNT 09761 City ofAspen Engineering Department _ . -f -i ~ 9/4/2003 5570 - Licenses and pennits 1. 304 Hallam 450 X 1.85 Rent - ~ ~ 832.50 ..i.0 - 21,---. O 4*fÂ©@t., . F.dic-k**%*- .. 1 - - I. f< 5, li fy"M :2 -- US Bank 304 Hallain 450 X 1.85 RENT 832.50 Â·r .. .... . 1 - C . :=Â¢:,~-*f?*NisÂ·:.1. Â¥~EN, .4.& 6.. 4*484452 6*'. Re. ' I. - - ..1. 1. f.j ,-,/i (1 -- ...I-5.1,2 ----, -1 Â· r.Â·-$<%â‚¬,n -I - - 4... W. '11.0.U Encroachmellicense Applicelon Checklist ' - This checklist has been- provided to serve the applicant as a reminder to include all required documents . - and application processing fees. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. U Readi understand and fill out the application completely (do not leave blank spac~s). # <- 0 For short-term encroachments including construction sites, attach a scaled drawing of the site indicating the requested area to be encroached on 8 14" x 11" paper. For perpetuated encroachment including fences, unusual mail boxes, etc., or a pre-existed encroachment in perpetuity such as the old - historic buildings, attach an 8 1/7 x 11" drawing, accurately prepared by a Professional Land Surveyor. All drawings must include the following information: â€¢ Property lines. - â€¢ Property address. 0 2 - - â€¢ Abutting street and alley namer ~ -- ~.... 1 .. ....-...1 y. .. - -*r- 2 , -â€¢ Dimensions ofarea to be encroached. #:1 0 Obtainacertificate of Uability Insurance'thaL -1 47.- 1 - 1-'34-. Â· . . *.~ - 34 ?ZÂ· tk â€¢' -~â€¢ Names the City of AspA ds additional indilt@dwith applicant's name and address. â€¢ Has a cancellation clause that must state "shall notify in writing" instead of ~Endeavor to notify. â€¢ I f the insurance policy is cancelled or not renewed, the 6ncroachment license becomes null _ - and void at that time. â€¢ Must be issued by an insurance company licensed to do business under Colorado State law.- iks O An *lication review fee of $150 {check for $330 made out to the City of Aspen Engineering . + 4,4.5.22 Department) must. accompany the application. .... '492~, 7.24 B + > 0 fq 0 Space lease payment for the occupied/restricted right-of-way at the rate of $1.85 per square foot per_ month (adjusted annually) must be included for the duration of the license for commercial operations ~ including construction, remodeling, landscaping, etc. - 4-50 40 *- 1. g.s----2 ~/& - E Have- all of the application elements completed and assembled before presenting it to the - Engineering Department for review. | City of Aspen - Engineering Department 130 South Galena Street, Aspen Colorado 81611 /970-920-5080 Â·7 -*-. Nk"Â· Â·â‚¬:F . r Â·. 3'1-77 - -Â· - Revocab~ Encroachment Lic*~se Requirements 1. LICENSE CONDITIONS A. Procedure for review and issuance of license Encroachment licenses are reviewed by the Engineering Staff and approved or denied by the City Engineer. Depending upon the feasibility of an encroachment into a public right of way and restrictions imposed upon use of the ROW for public access, delivery and installation of underground services, an application for encroachment license may be denied or approved in accordance with the City of Aspen Municipal Code (AMC 21.04.050,21.04.060,21.04.070,21.04.080, and 21.04.090). - 11... LICENSE APPLICATION Part One - Application Review Procedures The Engineering Department. reviews -an application for encroachment under the following submittal requirements: 1. The Engineering department must receive a current application fee. This fee is set by the City fee resolution, and is not refundable even H the application is dettied. - 3 3 2. .An Engineering Department application form must be completed and stibmitted. - 0 - 3. An accurate scaled drawing of the location showing property lines and property address, abutting streetnamecand i dimensions of proposed area to be encroached. Text fonts may not be smaller than 10 points and pan size must be 4 - kept to letter size sheet for recording purposes. 97~- .A fully submitted encroachment license application wilibe reviewed for approval or denial of the request. All applications :will be reviewed according to the following criteria: â€¢ Unrestricted access to encroacher z= End construction work within encroachment at any time by the City and utility . 9Â£.94<:Â· f j companies. :UZE , 2-lmpact on traffic-circulation and areas designated for vehicular tum-around movement deck oherhang space, etc. 9-.. - â€¢ Street or alley maintenance operations, snow removal and snow storage operations. Â¥182 .â€¢-:~'Access to underground utilities within the public ROW corridor and area to be encroached. - â€¢ Code and Law Enforcement: Would the encroachment cause a problem or compound an existing problem for traffic . control, City Police, ambulance service or fire protection district operations? . -- e income producing spaces including paid parking stalls, net leasable commercial area or other income producing spaces may not be encroached unless a rental agreement is obtained from the City of Aspen prior to application for encroachment. â€¢ Comp/iance with adopted Master Plans: An encroachment shall not override the requirements of other adopted land use master plans such as the Trail corridors, Mails, improvement districts, etc. â€¢ Benefit: Consideration of whether the encroachment is beneficial to the City of Aspeh. As a general policy, it is not in - the City's interest to grant encroachments, thereby providing public property for private use. New structures should be - able to accomplish their various needs within the confines of their property boundaries and required setbacks. 3**i:*c.Granting of encroachment would generally occur under one of the following conditions:;05.**48.4.....3-.6:.â€¢Â·-Â·Â·.Â«Â·i' :6-44 a) To acknowledge an existing, historical condition and to outline the ownefs liability and respohsibility for maintenance and removal of the encroaching structure, or - b) To license an encroachment that isa public amenity. Examples may include awnings on commercial . : ~.- Â· ~ - structures, non-restrictive safe objects, planters in the right-of-way (but not within pedestdan walkways); 2.1 4 of Asbln.- Engineering Department, 130-South Galena Strell,Aspen Colorado 81611 2970-920-5080 . . ~ 24, + .â€¢aÂ·. S.Â·~~ - ~ - _ ~ ' ~ . '.~c~f irrigation systems app~d by Engin,ering and Parks Departmenl~aintain [andscaping withih public . J 1 - * - . 74 - 9 ilight-of-Way,-of. ./. c) To allow construction trailers, dumpsters, temporaty pedestriah walkways, and scaffolds fo-be placed in the. .Â· - - . -. public ROW and on a temporary basis not to exceed 12 months. The applicant must prove to thu City, lack of ~ - - storage space on his/her private property with- an acceptably justifiable reason. Part Two - Requirements for Gaining an Encroachment License when Application is Approved: - â€¢ A City Engineering Department encroachment license form must be completed, signed and notarifed. . Licensee shall show proof of this insurance to the City before this agreement is filed. General liability insurance certificate, in the amount not less than statutory limits. Such certificate must be issued by an insurance company having an established office in Colorado and licensed to do business under Colorado State laws. The insurance certificate must be issued under the following conditions: 1) The certificate must include a statement saying "City of Aspen" as additional insured. 2) Must be valid for the duration of the encroachment. It shall be-renewed if necessary to provide continuous coverage. 3)" The insurance certificate shall not be canceled under ahy circumstances. Failure to comply with this. requirement shall automatical[y revoke the encroachment license. .:Â·.,-44',V : -.1 -afl Â· -- i ~ -1 . NOTE: M\ insorancepolicies thatare maintained pursuant tothis agreementshallcontain the followingÂ» Â«237 i - endorsement: '7t is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance policy may not be canceled by the surety until thirty (30) days after receipt by the City, by --4 , registefed mail, of a written notice of such intention to cancel or not to renew." *.4+'14 â€¢. . Payment of recording fees as posted by the Pitkin County Recorder's-Office. (Recording fee checks must be issued to ... Pitkin County Clerk & Recorder) - Â·2-44: - P - . ... City of Aspen - Engineering Department, 130 South Galena Street Aspen Colorado 81611 2970Â·920-5080 Â» _==...RE\~CABLE ENCROACHIJÂ»LIT LICENSE ....L- County Recording Data: Reception Number: - Book Number. Page Number: - - (1{1111(1{1-1111(11{ft' = ))11)),1-31))))13};_112)) INSTRUCTIONS: COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS AS IT APPUESTP YOUR REQUEST THIS LICENSE ]S FOR: (CHECKONEOALÂ¥] C] TEMOPORARY SHORTTERM OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC ROW FROM 6 6'/ 7-~ / C~ / .7 TO NO V. /.57/,2 O TEMPORARY, PERPETUATED UNTIL REVOKED BY THE CrrY. D TEMPORARY FOR PRE-EXISTED CONDmON AND PERPETUATED UNTIL REVOKED BY THE CKY. - This Agreement made under this license and entered into this day of , 200-2, by and between the CITY OF ASPEN, Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "ASPEN" and ~T w E u LLÂ© e 11& d 4* f MA}V &-r. jr 2 )\ AÂ£fâ‚¬P; U> 91 6,0 (Ptint Full NErne} (Prat Legal M*ng Address) daytime phone number: 900- 7 9 1 9 , hereinafter refen'ed to as "Licensee", CO #047*70 /2- . t WHEREAS, Licensee is the owner of the following described properties located in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado: Street Address: 309 W - MAL 1 4 /,1 AsfeP cO. Legal Address: EL O C-/6 9 12- LDT P WHEREAS, said properties abut the following described public right(s)-of-way: Lens P + 6 WHEREAS, Ucensee desires to encroach upon said right-of-way for the following purposes and as shown and described in Exhibit "A",attached to this Ucense: . - Ftee r:y- l,fl'/P 6, 40 U &, 7--6 Fo/LD 'tle{0 -Foop D A'770,u , \ ~ WHEREAS, Section 21.04.050 of City of Aspen Municipal Code delegates the authority to the City Engineer to grant- encroachment licehses, 0 ./ . Â· ' Ch. t.4 ---4 :Â·5*kN~.4.61:'12Â·3<1 .43 1Â·344.*-1902-â‚¬?.tj.; r.Â·.R... L WHEREAS, ASPEN agrees to the grant of a private license of encroachmeni as built subject to certain conditions, THEREFORE,. in consideration of the mutual agreement hereinafter contained, ASPEN and Licensee covenant and agree as follows: 01. A revocable license is hereby granted to Licensee to occupy, maintain and utilize the above described portion of public right-of-way for.the.purposes described. 02. This license is granted for a specific use and within a specified term as checked above, subject to being terrninated at any time and for any reason at the sole discretion of the City Engineer of the City of Aspen. 03. This ]icense shall be subordinate to the right of ASPEN to use said area for anypublic purposes. I . .1. ty- 4 - _ - 04. Licensee is responsible for the maintenance and repair of the pubrc right-of-way, togethdrWith improvements constructed therein, which ASPEN, in the exercise of its discretion, shall determine to be necessary to keep the same in a safe and clean condition. The Licensee shall obtain right-of-way and Building Permit as required by the City for any - -- ~ work to be perfomied in the public right-of-way with design approvals for such work obtained from the Engiheering Department Licensee agrees to join any improvement district formed for the purpose 01 constructing improvemunts - City of Aspen --Engineering Department 130 South dalena Str-t, Aspen Colorado 81611 - Â· i -j * ' * - .- ~ - - 8970Â·920.5080 ' ~.. : within public right-of-way. . ~ - . - 05. Unless the property that is the subject of this license agreement is covered by a homeownefs insurance policy, Licensee ' - shall at all times-during the term hereof, carry public liability insurance for the benefit of the City with limits of not less than those specified by Section 24-10-114, C.R.S., (currently $150,000 per person and $600,000 per occunence) as _ - may be amended from time to time, naming the City as "Additional insured". 06. Licensee shall maintain said public liability insurance coverage in full force and effect during the term of this License and shall furnish the City with a most current certificate ofsuch coverage evidencing its validity.-Allinsurance policies maintained pursuant to this agreement shall contain the following endorsement: '7t is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance policy may not be canceled by the surety until thirty (30) days after receipt by the City, by registered mail, of a written notice of such intention to cancel or not to renew. " The Licensee shall show proof of this insurance to the City before this agreement is filed. . 07. Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Aspen, its officers, employees, insurers, and self-insurance, from and against all liability, claims, and demands, on account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury, death, property loss or damages, or any other loss of any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this license, if such injury, loss, or damage is caused in whole or in part by, or is daimed to be caused in whole or part by the act, omission, error, professional en-or, mistake, negligence, or other fault ofrcensee. Ucensee agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claim or demands at the sole expense of the licensep p,4 at the option of the City of Aspen, licensee agrees to ' pay City of Aspen or reimburse City of Aspen for the Â¢efense cbstAncurred:by-lhe City of Aspenitfconnection with, any such liability, claims, or demands. The licensee also agrees to bearall other costs and expenses related thereto, including court costs and attorney fees, whether or riot any such liability, daims, ortlemands alleged are groundless, - false or fraudulent. - 08. This license may be terminated by Ucensee at any time and for any reason following delivery of a written notice of -- , Licensee's intent to cancel. ASPEN may terminate this licehse at any time and for any reason. Upon termination, ' Licensee shall at Licensees expense, femove any improvements or encroachments from said property. The property shall be restored to a condition satisfactory to ASPEN. -- + 4 . - 09. This license is subjectto all state law; the provisions of the Charter of the City of Aspen as it now edsts or May hereafter be amended, and the ordinances of the City of Aspen now in effect or those which may hereafter is adopted.1.- 4 . ... . 2 .- 10. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to prevent Aspen from granting such additional licenses or property interests in or affecting said public property as it deems necessary. 11. The conditions hereof imposed on the granted license of encroachment shall constitute covenants running with the land, and binding upon Licensee. 12. In any legal action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonabte attorney's fees. 13. If the structure for which this license was issued is removed for any reason, Licensee shall not continue to rebuild in the public right-of-way. The public right-of-way is for the general public benefit, and it is not for occupation or construction of 9 . . .AL, *encroathments. 3% 14. The licensee waives any and all claims against the City of Aspen for loss or damage to the improvements constructed within the encroachment area. -45. - I ~ | p 1 1 - O City of Aspen - Engineering-Depanment, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen-Colorado 81611 /t0420-5050 -I i - 15. The Licensee clearly un~ands the following actions of Licensee or |~r agents and employees shall automatically'- - terminate and-cancel this agreement 1 \ a) Discontinuation of insurance coverage - b)Change of ownership or alteration of use from the original specific use in encroached area c)Restriction of ASPEN orits agents and contractors from access toits public land underthe encroached area not occupied by a previously constructed building. Under these circumstances, the Licensee shall restore the right-of-way under the encroachment to its original or better . conditions immediately and in accordance with the latest Engineering Department standards for improvements-of Public Mght of way. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties executed this agreement at ASPEN the day and year first written. C , / 1.j , 7,6 - 37 RUcensee) 2 2 ./ m # i NOTARY: .4 - THE FOLLOWING SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY A NOTARY PUBLIC: a f -Ip#1Â·>~ : 5 STATEOF COLORADO ) - 1 co i --~ ' 1-312Â©, - 0:234,4/ County of Pill(in ..Â· ) . I - i - C.-. O %AT C..;,116, 08Â» -Â· : The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this - - j day of 51Â¥7Â»'NME , *23 by 800#21- 5. N/TEK (Ucensee). 29 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: 4-:-06 A#a- - Date . Notary Pubic knul Cow.,~g e ./.'... - Address i r-r-r (DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS UNE,FOR CITY USE ONLY) . i. 4:. .49'-*'3.71 &44Â· *.16.47.4 ~APPROVAL CONDITIONS listilany): 44 - ' ' 7 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO f By: . . . Â·- NICK ADEH, RE, Cly Er,ineer 4.:#Â·- f i .i-,51*-4-7,%12-a--03**4*#bik,6,23*190&,2,01*pÂ£4*Bi Â·4 ATTEST: - - - - --DATE: KATHRYN S. KOCH, City Clerk . ' -.Â·.- ENG-204 4of AÂ®en -Engineering Department, 130 South Galena St,et, Asperl Colorado 81611 Â·.. 40 Â·-2 -1 â‚¬ - 19704204080 ... 2- 6/ b 2%42 -t,4442;4'/ CÂ·'.)~~,Idâ‚¬Â£4 . --... ,K . 3&<4:.~- Q~,; 2.1.1-1. -- ..1 Â·Â· Â· Â· 1.''t I jw#41*~6 - 6 W~-0 TO ALL CONTRACTORS WHOSE LICENSE IS FOR A COMMERCIAL PROJECT PLEASE READ THIS PAGE CAREFULLY 1- 4Fic The attached sample-Certificate of Liability Insurance form needs to be done 2 ~ - cotrectly or your Encroachment application will be denied until the policy has been ~ . corrected. .. - The following points will help you to make this process easy. Â· Â·Â·'-r,/2..1 4 Â¢3*â‚¬-13#20 Description Box: The words " City of Aspen is listed hs an additional 3-tr. ~:~J 42.- ~p~.~I~msured'-' need to appear in the description box ofthe policy. Please name -- the encroachment 0.e. dumpster, mailbox, fence, etc.) .:. *-ff.'T.Â·z3*-i,(2Â·)30.* : .- ..: 1...E .. - - - .*. Ft -ff-2.61.*- Cancellation Box: Must show the words/'endeavor to" crossed out - th; ~*#4*i:POSE.-- lihe should read "The issuing company will hiail 10 days Uitten notice of Â©59*fi-;--~ 710.-. 2 cancellation to the certificate holder named to the left". ~ -. fifi"*61.2~: Please make sure your insurance comp any enters this information correctly before your submission. Please make sure you read over the Certificate before submitting. f***fÂ¢**Ifti?.7â‚¬*t.tt *42-?1~.1~Â©- -f --1., - 2 -1 3.................... Thank you. Â»â‚¬**02Â· ~ , .. . Â·959>:%941 :Â·.tÂ· *1~.,- 2 - - -- I - - ::464 ~Â·0~~ 414-:Â·,.., 7~ 1 91 . ' 'w, 2 ' - DATE IMM/00/Ji-'~ 1% ketjkbâ„¢ teERitilÂ¢Ai~OF OABIUTY ENSUR*CE I 11 L ' r. ...1 PRODUCER ~ Â· THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATiON7 - ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 1 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ~ 1. U ,_ ~ COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE - , COMPANY ~ A - 0 - INSURED COMPANY COMPANY C COMPANY D COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE USTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUE~ TO â„¢E INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CON~ACT O)OTHER ~CUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE.FDUCIE~ESCRI~ HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN RED'~*ED-~F PAID ~IMS. CO * POUCY EFFECTIVE 0~LICY Â©<,@MATION TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER UMITS LTR 0~ DATE IMM/OD/YY. 6 a~~/DE>MY) A GENERAL WAeurrY - ,~ 24. GENERAL AGGRES s 1000000 - ~ COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILITY . - PRODUCT MptOP AGG S | | CLAIMS MADE |~~~ OCCUR - p P AL & ADV INJURY s OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE s 1000000 ARE DAMAGE (Anv oni hria ,-50000 - MED EXP (AnY one person) s 5000 AU-OMOBILE UANUTY 11, 1 - COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT , ANY AUTO - .- < ALL OWNED AUTOS -. BODILY INJURY $ (P,r p*rsont SCHEDULED AUTOS . . ...1 - HIRED AUTOS L '- -- # BODILY tNJURY g - . ' -- tr,r Â£06-,0 - NON-OWNED AUTOS ~ ~ _ - PROPERTY DAMAGE s '- ~ ' AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ .. OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: ANY AUTO . . 2 .:-- EACH ACCIONT * AGGREGATE $ EXCESS UABILITY Â· EACH OCCURRENCE * --~ UMBRELLA FORM - - I - - AGGREGATE s OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM * - s 1 WC STATU- 1 10â„¢*t: .1 Â·Â· ; Â· . WORIESS .CMPENEAT.CN ANO ITORYUMIT51 EMPLOYERS' UABILITY - EL EACH ACCIDENT s i THE PROPRIETOR/ E-lINCL EL DISEASE - POUCY UMIT â€¢ PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE i OFFICERS ARE. ~-~EXCL EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERAnONS/LOCAnONSNEMICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS Cercificace holder im added aa additional insured *as re,peq:, 10 5he e,- 7- encroachments for the ..... . a - -1 dan*CA**1#LOEBE=-4-: 2-2.--1 til.4-2 -2.- 42.-4~23Â£.458*1489.99.-21- 2-3.1 :~ - ... .. - 1-i-1.-.-: _.-: -,-.- ..:y=~4;~1.-, - .---,i City of Aspen - SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUCIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXMRATION DATE â„¢IREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL.,V@OÂ»]COÂ¢]CX MAILL 1 0 DAYS WR,rrIN NOnCE TO â„¢E CERTIMCATE HOLDER'NAMED TO THE-LEFT. 130 S. Galena ~,-ah,l nncia.:20.nAn:PAR'.115 - Aspen. CO 81611 ) i ~ AUTHOPEED - . 1, 4 Ul, - I -/7 12.-t d#Â¢;1~64' ~AcoagÂ»kii*fi~--Â£~lt=r~~: 7-71T**~#mitbR~*j~i*WiEW 1 . 0 3// 4.. - -. - . - - I 21.- N - q 24#?114..2 (7] Ae>11-J I.â€¢ . I i-~~f ' %4Â» f,4 ... .Pad'~,4.11.'.1,1~-46 - .-:gw . 1 . '49 94-jÂ·k'.k Â·i:,Â£.=Â·11 . 4 1 .' , - - h - . I: . B. I. w . 4 2... 2 1,-St Â¥1*R,Â¥:01*ze.0 4 f 03*: ,.V- - 2 , Miw *mi- - '::'/*.42'-/4 V + - - .rl. 4 . - I 1 - - 1/*t//i' 'i)*41.;e~..' : AfÂ». 45.. i - r. , = 1,.... t. ''34= 9 1!LA 0*09, / * . .Â¢.216.k. 4 ..11 , .... U . I./.6 - 1 1 ... ' Al Â· Â· 0 . . . . Wal"*. ..1 - . .LiES' '1 * 1/ I . ... -,...:44:94:441.-' 2 - 1 . , . a 147 *44 I. ll./.9 -â€¢b .1 . ....L; ~ - 1 - - .. '4 -2...â€¢- I > ......t.: 4. Â· . I I . ~~m:.. ... -~- - 1.~/~:-Ii:j~*-4 ..- 4 .'-' . 1. Â». 1 . 5 9 . 2 2. t~ ) t -/4 *3*04 Utre I .*. * X 1 -/â€¢'list -9 Â£.2/ . I . 0 adv *fibi /-,+ ObÂ¥ 68900 -/0'im 0Â¥ft .. f d j.Â·10 107 828 Dd 429 I 1N3â€¢05Â¥3 ~ l 10403 ~ 0373 'UÂ¢A. . 806 dÂ¥0 ON 4*00 i i . 1 . .U . I . - . 3.0. 1 ...... t ..1 01 6 0 ' . #- w 4./ i .. 01 - HONI 1 .. . m. 3-Not -~,n:71:me> 44= . -J . -1 . 8,4.6, ~ U . h 4 4 Jep . 6 40 I i 1 PATIO 477 ' ./ 0 - 4.-1. 2 - E@g. mi 1,6 60 - %68) P-7 trid b 1 --.- - . 2 t.Â·~g~_-gl~E A Lore - . 2.14 - I ./i . . -i--6Â¥.4...i- . L. . - 9*1Â¥*. ... ?.1- I 1-. . ..edâ‚¬< i . .1 a.4.-- ict., - 3.0.019Â¥ 1 . ..1 1 ~~I:jit--/~ - ~. I ~&_'.- ~Â·- -rju//4484'*, ~ .: 2. i,; : --;.j ': .Litj-j#36 . r *744{:;4~0.*f 1,0 1 . -,.. Â·iÂ· Il: 2:â‚¬f#7Â·4.'. 1 - ... - (60*) 047 - Ve WI r - ./Ill,lip /*Il ~:-1Â£~7/'S..Fe . - ... ! d -. ' Li 4, - I$ uÂ·ALL M . . .. 30 lit ., j LS 3 2.- . ; 3-ty_.~ 4 --~.~ f : f.. _. 1 J ...110>ZEÂ·â€ž fO< s:22,64%6& -... C' lilli~':r, 'Lm" AE'. 0 2 . . I . I . I .- SHED . . 0 - . 1 PKnÂ° LOT 0 , ... 1 ,1 - r. S ... _ >,1 I-*-/ Ut'. C 4-0 . - !11 - - -0 (be -f e.ge .aid 4>9 :.*92Â©r Â· _.:<*~ ...:.~. - 1 .1 1. 1 lOT 0 1 4 .Z .. - -- ~:-:itit,I-of.-ct'ip - .... .. ...' '.944#Vp- I .- L .1. :le & (60*) . 4 . & . T . A . CAP 4. . . . I. , (9~; JO' ,.. Â· 304.t ex 7 -- Â· ~ 04/AMint/93*01':1 2.- 41 32 - :_ '92 - - . - - .G ... Sep 03 03 11:49a ISU Insurance Services p. 1 . ISU Insurance Services of Colorado, Inc. - The Problem Solvers 950 17th Street, Suite 1000, Denver, Colorado 80202-2819 - - Since 1882Â® (303) 534-2133 (800) 234-4478 - FAX (303) 892-5579 E-MAIL smurrav@isuinsurance.com Fax Cover Sheet Total Pages: 3 DATE: 9/3/2003 TO: Bob Witek RJW Builders, Inc FAX #: (970)920-7846 FROM: Sharon Murray, CPCU - RE: City of Aspen - Engineering Dept Certificat of Insurance i Bob, <e, 1 -Â·Â·gil Â·''Â·791â‚¬7~:Y-Â· '' -92 1-2- fly;,~2.-;f:-444.-1Â·~-~4:. ~cÂ·ftliÂ·)4:,jÂ·jj,-4:- ., _ Attached please find a copy of the certificate of insurance we are mailing to the City ofAspen, plus an original for you in the mail as well. Please let me know if you need anything else. 'Â·i-'Â·Â·i, r Pr#1*-4 :~ .. : ~, Best regards, 1 4. 3 *A. i - 4.1 - i'.ah,i.tÂ¥-Â¥#*f:*44#I*4-i:....4.f..3.3 1 1.4 7- ; 59*12 Sharon Murray, CPCU . : Â· y ie?Â·:~. I t.Â·~u,-2.-67.*-swk#4 Â·4.<ti-**3Â¥)4'a#'~ 3.42 44 -Â·.~ Â·": i J ...:. - -, .y. I Account Manager j r >~ - ,â‚¬'... - " ~ ' Ut-:*4Â· 5, Â· 47 : VÂ·ey'l# :lrelle, & --X Ow Knowled,6 h Your Bel Insurance -:. p r + . - - .- . ..F. A.~ .2 J <t-~ ~Â· imaiig S-ep 03 03 -11:49a ISU Insurance Services p.2 ACORQ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (M-Dmm 09/03/2003 PRODUCER (303)534-2133 FAX (303)892-5579 â„¢IS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ISU Insurance Services of Colo.. Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 950 17th Street. Suite 1000 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BELOW. Denver, CO 80202-2819 David Adams INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED R JW Buil ders, Inc - INSURER A NATIONAL FIRE & MARINE INS CO 411 East Mai n St INSURER B: Aspen, CA 81611-2945 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOT,MTHSTANDINC ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. - INSR ADD'L POLICY EFFECRVE POUCY EXPIRABON liB INRRI TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER naT,= fâ€¢â€¢inor,vi n.Â·rF (Mid/nal'Yv~ LIMITS GENERAL UABILITY 72LP154175 02/02/2003 02/02/2004 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1.000.000 DAMAGE TO RENTED X COMMERCIAL GENERAL PRal,SES (Ea =u-0 $ 100,000 | CLAIMS MADE ~ X | OCCUR - ~ ~ MED EXP (Anyone p,rion) S 5,000 1 - j A PERSONAL&ADV NJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 i. . GEWL AGGREGATE UM1TAPPLIES PER: - PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG S 2,000,000 |POLICY | 1 MA ~ ~ LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CONEINED SINGLE UMIT $ ANY AUTO - ~ (138 acctia,M ALI OWNED AUTOS- BODILY INJURY S SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) HIRED AUTOS - ' I. BODILY INJURY s NON-OWNED AUTOS :A: - (P..â€¢=ident . .4 1. PRON,MY DAN~GE GARAGE UABILrlY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT S | ANY AIJTO - OTHER THAN EAACC S 1 AUTO ONLY. AGG 5 EXCESS,UMBRELLA UABIUTY EACH OCCURRENCE $ *. -f.%44 - xur I 1 OCCUR ~ | CLAIMS MADE _ ' ' AGGREGATE S - DEDUCT]BL6 - f: t:<' ' â€¢ Â·:' '$*. 1 ... - . 6 ' - . I ~4Â·. - - RETENTION * 1- 1 WC STATU- f 1OTH- WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I TORY LIMITS 1 i ER f : - ElaIPLO'rte UASUTY E.LEACH ACCIDENT $ NNPROPMETOWPARINERIEXECUINE OFFICEIVMEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE S N yps. discrhe under SPECIAL. PROVISIONS below EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OFF OPERATIONS / LOCATONS / VEHICLES, EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PRC VmONS Certificate Holder is Additional Insured as their interest may appear in the business of the Named Insured as regards the issuance of Encroachment Permit. 1,01.Â»,2 Â· *'CERnACATE HOLDER ' 1 '44%2 SHOULD ANY OF â„¢E ABOVE OESCRBED POUCIES BE CANCELLED BEFORETHE EXPIRAYION DA,E â„¢EREOF. THE ISSUING INSURER WILL N**~INÂ» NAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOT,CE TO THE CERnFICATE HOLDER NANED TO TNE LEFT. IJTFNUIRE TOMAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OaUGATION OR UABIUTY City of Aspen - Engineering Department 130 South Salena Street OF#NY KiND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESEWTATIVES. Aspen, CO 81611 AUTHORg'DRPRESENTATWE David Adams/CLZ Â¢ Annon m annimm aae:oRnr:nepne.no., .0 ... - i, . 0 - - 4, e :019 Spp 03 03 11:508 Lip Insurance Services -~ p.3 IMPORTANT It the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s). authorized representative or producer. and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. 244, Â· 2 - ..al-ctÂ· A ......42. , 'AgÂ·k: 4- . r P .. - Â· 9:>i:F:- 134.+4.4,1.--'t 39. ~- - Â·- ~ 9$-4 - r. - - .:41.- ..â‚¬:.i.%*,*Â·:94Â·,>*344<4/44%,0,hpl.ST#.Â®~4*Wk,4"*04)NA~*%,04 ~s..9Â·:~*.~- wiÂ¥.4 - ~~--.~j~Â· Â·tvÂ·~Â·.Â· 4*i>Â·t~Â·i~*Â·,~= 4,34&6 acnenx ,-mi 2:**6 4 - AUG-19-2003 14:32 ~R J W BUILDERS 970 920 7846 P.01/01 #JW BUILDERS, ~c. 411 East Main Street, Suite #211 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Off: (970) 920-7919 Fax: (9701 920-7846 At@&1_=3 L-fj0293_-C-JE-38 -- - _ Lnf _n TO: Ms. Amy Guthrie 920-5096 FAX #: 920-EÂ·439 RE: 320 West Hallam Owner Judy Haas FROM: Bob Witek Cell# (970) 379-7555 If you do not eceive all of the Dages, please call as soon as possible at (970) 920-7919 Date: 8/19/03 , Time: 2:40 PM Total pages including cover: 1 REMARKS I have been to the site and have a question I hope you can help me with. Since t ie lot is so tight for space and there are trees that we are protecting and saving, we have only one alternative when we move the existing house off of the foundation and that would be to move the house-off the foundation toward Hallam street and partially into the parking on Hallam. What process will I need to go through to get approval to have access to the City easement and the parking area in the street for about 2 to 3 weeks? I would appreciate any input you may hbve with my predicament. Thanks Flf/L i - -1 TOTAL P.01 1 .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall rbmain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Judv Haas, P.O. Box 330, Aspen, CO, 81612. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number 304 W. Hallam Street, Lot P. Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The Historic Preservation Commission has approved a plan for an addition to this house. Written Description ofthe Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approved per HPC Resolution #17, Series of 2003, Julv 9, 2003. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) August 9,2003 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 9,2005 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 9th day of August, 2003, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. le Ann Woods, Community Development Director .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall rbmain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Judv Haas, P.O. Box 330, Aspen, CO, 81612. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number 304 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, Citv and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The Historic Preservation Commission has approved a plan for an addition to this house. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approved per HPC Resolution #17, Series of 2003, Julv 9, 2003. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Aucust 9,2003 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 9,2005 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 9th day of August, 2003, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director AUG-04-2003 13:51 ~R J W BUILDERS 970 920 7846 P.01/01 h BUIDERS, Me. 411 East Main Street, Suite #211 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Off: (970) 920-7919 Fax: (970) 920-7846 71@%--M--1-~ n --941-34-L JL J~ - - _ 64 _1 TO: Ms. Amy Guthrie 920-5096 FAX #: 920-5439 RE: 320 & Vest Hallam Street, Aspen New foundation layout FROM: Bob Witek Cell # (970) 379-7555 If vou do not receive all of the paaes. please call as soon as possible at (970) 920-7919 Date: 8/4/03 Time: 2:00 PM Total pages including cover: 1 REMARKS Regarding c ur discussion on the phone this morning about the location of the existing house which is off skew to the property lines and your recommendation o# making the new foundation perpendicular with the property lines, I have met w=th the owner and she would like us to use your recommendation and make the new foundation perpendicular to the existing property lines. We will be certain that there is no problem with set backs prior to making any correcions. Thanks /3 m Â»310 - TOTAL P.01 . EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM 1 64 , 0.-f [7-1 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 320 W. Hallam Street- Major Development Review (Final)- Public Hearing DATE: July 9,2003 SUMMARY: The subject property is a 3,000 square foot parcel that was created as the result of a recently approved historic landmark lot split. It contains a Pan Abode home built in 1966. The application proposes an 826 square foot addition to the rear of the 600 square foot Pan Abode home. Conceptual approval, a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of the one required on-site parking space were approved on May 23,2003. The conditions related to the design were that: 1. Windows and skylights will be evaluated at Final review. 2. The architect is to revise the connector piece between the old and new construction so that it slips under the eave of the existing Pan Abode roof. The packet includes responses to these issues as well as all other matters related to Final review. Staff recommends approval be granted with conditions. APPLICANT: Judy Haas, owner, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001. ADDRESS: 320 W. Hallam, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). CURRENT LAND USE: Single-family residence. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to 1 .. the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Recently, the HPC has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter historic structures. The following questions are likely to be the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How would the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the property? The property is significant as an example of housing built early in Aspen' s history as a ski town, at a time when economy and simplicity were desirable. Kit homes like this one were inexpensive and quick to build. Although the structures were machine produced, they still reflected the same American West iconography of the older true log structures in town. The Pan Abodes simulated traditional log construction and referenced its important details. Key features of Pan Abodes are that they are typically single story, with a low-pitched gable roof. They sometimes have deep eaves, and usually have exposed rafter tails. The flat surface of the machine shaped, tongue and groove logs are central to the building's character. Window openings are spare and usually horizontally proportioned, and wood trim is used to finish out the window openings. The building plans are simple rectangular forms, with smaller additive elements. Detail and decoration are minimal. This particular Pan Abode stands in a neighborhood where there is a reasonably strong Victorian context, including the two Victorian era homes to the west and one across the street. Historic cottonwoods still line this side of the block. The small scale of this home, its materials, and low pitched roof form are anomalies on the block, however this modestly sized building is in no way 2 0 0 intrusive. A small addition can be reasonably made to the structure without a negative impact on the character of the area. There are no apparent alterations to this Pan Abode from its appearance in 1966. An addition constructed behind it, and distanced from it with a connector should not negatively affect the Pan Abode' s integrity score. Any architectural changes permitted to happen to the historic house itself will need to be carefully weighed to insure that integrity is not compromised. The project represents a build out of all but a small amount of square footage allotted to the site, so no significant projects would be anticipated to affect this site in the future. Design Guideline review The lot split approval for this property established some parameters that affect the current application. In recognition of HPC having granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus for the future redevelopment of this home and the adjacent Victorian, the Pan Abode became a designated historic structure and cannot be demolished. The maximum floor area for all construction on the Pan Abode lot was set at 1,500 square feet. A 2' west sideyard setback variance and a 2' combined sideyard setback variance were granted to accommodate the Pan Abode's existing location. The building is slightly crooked on the lot. Although the site plan included in the HPC's drawing set shows the Pan Abode square to the lot lines, the architect intends to maintain its skewed placement. Final review deals with details such as the landscape plan, lighting, fenestration and detailing, selection of new materials, and technical issues surrounding the preservation of existing materials. A list of all of the design guidelines that staff finds are relevant to Final Review is attached as "Exhibit B." Planned alterations to this historic home are the in kind replacement of the existing window units and roof, and installation of a skylight on the western roof slope. Staff has no issue with replacing the roof, which is an important maintenance issue, as long as the material is detailed to match what is on the Pan Abode now. With regard to replacing the window units and adding a skylight, the guidelines are: 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. o Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. o Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. o Preserve the original glass, when feasible. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3 .. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. o A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's easing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. The application does not discuss the condition of the existing windows, or explain why replacement is necessary. Running through the integrity scoring sheet for Rustic style buildings, staff scores 320 W. Hallam at 86 points, including the impacts from this proposal, except for window replacement. Replacement of all of the windows could drop the score by up to 5 points, but the property would still pass threshold. In the case of a post-war structure such as this one, the original window units may not have the same craftsmanship that HPC is trying to retain on Victorian homes, however, there should be more discussion about this aspect of the proposal. If the windows can be replaced, details and cut sheets will need to be approved by staff and monitor to verify that the replacement is as exact as possible. Staff does not support the addition of a skylight on the roof of the Pan Abode, particularly one that is not flush with the roof plane as required by guideline 7.3. HPC has not allowed skylights to be installed on the historic portion of any building in the recent past. Moving on to the new construction, HPC expressed concern at the Conceptual hearing with the way that the connector roof is fiush with the Pan Abode roof plane. The architect has provided information in the packet explaining the technical reasons for this decision. Although guideline 10.10 generally discourages tying into historic eavelines, the justification in this case is understandable, and the condition will not be visible from the street. The guideline is: 10.10 Design an,addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 4 .. Staff finds that the materials selected for the addition are appropriate and compatible with the Pan Abode. The board should discuss the glazing proposed in the street facing gable end. Staff believes that the transparency created by this glass will help to minimize the difference in roof heights between the old and new construction when viewed from the street. The same may not be true though of the skylight proposed to run along the ridge. It seems as though highlighting the spine of the roof on the addition may call attention to the difference in roof heights. Guideline 7.3, above, applies. Staff finds that overall, this is a successful project that will provide a good example of how Pan Abode structures can be preserved and expanded. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant final approval for 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing Â·Â· condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and . approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode and along the ridge of the new addition are not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or 5 .. without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 6 .. "Exhibit B: Relevant Design Guidelines for 320 W. Hallam, Final Review" Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. o This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. o Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. Private Yard 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. o The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. o If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials. o Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. o Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. o Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. o Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. Â¤ Provide proper drainage and ventilation to minimize rot. D Maintain protective coatings to retard drying and ultraviolet damage. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. o Always prepare a good substrate. *Prior to painting, remove damaged Â·or deteriorated paint only to the next intact layer, using the gentlest means possible. o Use compatible paints. Some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil-based paints without a primer coat. Roofs 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. 7 .. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. o Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. o Specialty materials such as tile, slate or concrete should be replaced with a matching material. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. o Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. o If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. o If copper Hashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non-reflective finish. 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detract from the historic appearance of the building. o A metal roof material should have an earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o A metal roof with a lead-like patina also is an acceptable alternative. o Seams should be of a low profile. o A roof assembly with a high profile seam or thick edge is inappropriate. Building Relocation 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. o On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a modest miner's cottage is discouraged because it would be out of character. o Where a stone foundation was used historically, and is to be replaced, the replacement should be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. o Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. 3 Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. Building Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. 8 .. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. Lighting 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. o Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. o Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. o Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. o Do not wash an entire building facade in light. o Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. i Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 9 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 320 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Invemory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 9,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the proj ect be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Final) approval with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. .. 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode andrÂ·siong-The--5idgâ‚¬'of the ne1;ad-11.-ure not approved. Â·5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. .1.11.1.1. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July, 2003. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 320 W. Hallam Street- Major Development Review (Final)- Public Hearing DATE: July 9,2003 SUMMARY: The subject property is a 3,000 square foot parcel that was created as the result of a recently approved historic landmark lot split. It contains a Pan Abode home built in 1966. The application proposes an 826 square foot addition to the rear of the 600 square foot Pan Abode home. Conceptual approval, a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of the one required on-site parking space were approved on May 23,2003. The conditions related to the design were that: 1. Windows and skylights will be evaluated at Final review. 2. The architect is to revise the connector piece between the old and new construction so that it slips under the eave of the existing Pan Abode roof. The packet includes responses to these issues as well as all other matters related to Final review. Staff recommends approval be granted with conditions. APPLICANT: Judy Haas, owner, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001. ADDRESS: 320 W. Hallam, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). CURRENT LAND USE: Single-family residence. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to 1 .. the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Recently, the HPC has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter historic structures. The following questions are likely to be the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How wouldÂ·the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the property? The property is significant as an example of housing built early in Aspen's history as a ski town, at a time when economy and simplicity were desirable. Kit homes like this one were inexpensive and quick to build. Although the structures were machine produced, they still reflected the same American West iconography of the older true log structures in town. The Pan Abodes simulated traditional log construction and referenced its important details. Key features of Pan Abodes are that they are typically single story, with a low-pitched gable roof. They sometimes have deep eaves, and usually have exposed rafter tails. The flat surface of the machine shaped, tongue and groove logs are central to the building' s character. Window openings are spare and usually horizontally proportioned, and wood trim is used to finish out the window openings. The building plans are simple rectangular forms, with smaller additive elements. Detail and decoration are minimal. This particular Pan Abode stands in a neighborhood where there is a reasonably strong Victorian context, including the two Victorian era homes to the west and one across the street. Historic cottonwoods still line this side of the block. The small scale of this home, its materials, and low pitched roof form are anomalies on the block, however this modestly sized building is in no way 2 .. intrusive. A small addition can be reasonably made to the structure without a negative impact on the character of the area. There are no apparent alterations to this Pan Abode from its appearance in 1966. An addition constructed behind it, and distanced from it with a connector should not negatively affect the Pan Abode's integrity score. Any architectural changes permitted to happen to the historic house itself will need to be carefully weighed to insure that integrity is not compromised. The project represents a build out of all but a small amount of square footage allotted to the site, so no significant projects would be anticipated to affect this site in the future. Design Guideline review The lot split approval for this property established some parameters that affect the current application. In recognition of HPC having granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus for the future redevelopment of this home and the adjacent Victorian, the Pan Abode became a designated historic structure and cannot be demolished. The maximum floor area for all construction on the Pan Abode lot was set at 1,500 square feet. A 2' west sideyard setback variance and a 2' combined sideyard setback variance were granted to accommodate the Pan Abode's existing location. The building is slightly crooked on the lot. Although the site plan included in the HPC' s drawing set shows the Pan Abode square to the lot lines, the architect intends to maintain its skewed placernent. Final review deals with details such as the landscape plan, lighting, fenestration and detailing, selection of new materials, and technical issues surrounding the preservation of existing materials. A list of all of the design guidelines that staff finds are relevant to Final Review is attached as "Exhibit B." Planned alterations to this historic home are the in kind replacement of the existing window units and roof, and installation of a skylight on the western roof slope. Staff has no issue with replacing the roof, which is an important maintenance issue, as long as the material is detailed to match what is on the Pan Abode now. With regard to replacing the window units and adding a skylight, the guidelines are: 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. ci Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, silk heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. 1 Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. o Preserve the original glass, when feasible. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3 .. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. u A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. The application does not discuss the condition of the existing windows, or explain why replacement is necessary. Running through the integrity scoring sheet for Rustic style buildings, staff scores 320 W. Hallam at 86 points, including the impacts from this proposal, except for window replacement. Replacement of all of the windows could drop the score by up to 5 points, but the property would still pass threshold. In the case of a post-war structure such as this one, the original window units may not have the same craftsmanship that HPC is trying to retain on Victorian homes, however, there should be more discussion about this aspect of the proposal. If the windows can be replaced, details and cut sheets will need to be approved by staff and monitor to verify that the replacement is as exact as possible. Staff does not support the addition of a skylight on the roof of the Pan Abode, particularly one that is not flush with the roof plane as required by guideline 7.3. HPC has not allowed skylights to be installed on the historic portion of any building in the recent past. Moving on to the new construction, HPC expressed concern at the Conceptual hearing with the way that the connector roof is flush with the Pan Abode roof plane. The architect has provided information in the packet explaining the technical reasons for this decision. Although guideline 10.10 generally discourages tying into historic eavelines, the justification in this case is understandable, and the condition will not be visible from the street. The guideline is: 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 4 - .. Staff finds that the materials selected for the addition are appropriate and compatible with the Pan Abode. The board should discuss the glazing proposed in the street facing gable end. Staff believes that the transparency created by this glass will help to minimize the difference in roof heights between the old and new construction when viewed from the street. The same may not be true though of the skylight proposed to run along the ridge. It seems as though highlighting the spine of the roof on the addition may call attention to the difference in roof heights. Guideline 7.3, above, applies. Staff finds that overall, this is a successful project that will provide a good example of how Pan Abode structures can be preserved and expanded. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant final approval for 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to - accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 1/0 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode and,40,10 the rirlge.ofuthe-new-additien-are 1 Y not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or 5 .. without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions o f approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet o f the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 6 .. "Exhibit B: Relevant Design Guidelines for 320 W. Hallam, Final Review" Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. o This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. u Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. Private Yard 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. o The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. o If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials. =1 Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. -./ o Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. o Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. u Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. o Provide proper drainage and ventilation to minimize rot. o Maintain protective coatings to retard drying and ultraviolet damage. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. u Always prepare a good substrate. Prior to painting, remove damaged or deteriorated paint only to the next intact layer, using the gentlest means possible. o Use compatible paints. Some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil-based paints without a primer coat. Roofs 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. 7 .. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. o Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. o Specialty materials such as tile, slate or concrete should be replaced with a matching material. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. u Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. o If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. u Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. u If copper Hashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non-reflective finish. 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detract from the historic appearance of the building. o A metal roof material should have an earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o A metal roof with a lead-like patina also is an acceptable alternative. o Seams should be of a low profile. o A roof assembly with a high profile seam or thick edge is inappropriate. Building Relocation 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. o On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a modest miner's cottage is discouraged because it would be out of character. o Where a stone foundation was used historically, and is to be replaced, the replacement should be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. o Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. o Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. Building Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. 8 .. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. 1 A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. Lighting 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. u All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. o Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. o Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. o Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. ci Do not wash an entire building facade in light. o Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. o Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 9 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 320 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 9,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Final) approval with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. .. 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode and along the ridge of the new addition are not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain thern. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July, 2003. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Land Use Applicatioi~ THE CrrY OF ASPEN PROJECT: Name: <-AL+tut.TE, -aas/FEM<kiEL Location: 9,-20 HAU_:409 -Â«EEET- (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) F L.67-77~ 42 292.-ack-,7 .* 27-3 7-07-3> -1H--001 APPLICANT: Name: . )UPY 9.>46 Address: R> 13* 3-30 Phone #: 125-*90 Fax#: 429--331 0 E-mail: /reÂ·k@9+wt,c barr(o idetts r-A REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1/M WÂ«, / 1Â»BC Â«k.*Ch Address: -320 674Â£1 LAAE- Phone #: -309 - 0695 Fax#: 423-78'22 E-mail: *trnE /5,6 AaÂ»12- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El Historic Designation ~ Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) ~1 Certificate of No Negative Effect ~ Demolition (total demolition) ~ Certificate of Appropriateness U Historic Landmark Lot Split -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, ete.) Ek\-ST-1 *16 (200 .fek yr- FmtÂ·J _,A1301/EL PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) /lau *013> r-r-rakj ONAJÂ«r19O:277601 - flâ‚¬TEe)ALS PAM:=-1 1 E 1*EVIEUJ FEES DUE: $ .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 304 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 17, SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-00-222 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 304 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 9,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Final) approval with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. .. 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode is not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. A relocatjon plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to stilI exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July, 2003. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 32-0 LL), HGRAM , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -3-191 0 , 200- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) 3-aMas Li u\/4 being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have Complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: c & Publication oj notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. r Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment o f a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. /3 r i YJ- (37.ti< ~LtÂ»Â»x prgnature The foresoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknewledged before me thi~~~~ay Of -)2,7---_ , 2003-,by TEm-Â·,Â»O >-ArifS,r . PUBUC NOTICE RE: 320 W. HALLAM-MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ~ , WITNESS MYHAND ANDOFFICIAL SEAL (FINAL) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a publick hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 9,2003~ at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the As- ' My commission expires. 4)9- pen Historic Preservation Commission, Council 69-BY K US<74 Chambers, City Hall. 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to, consider an application submitted by Judy Haas, 1 requesting approval for Major Development (Fi~ 533 Ko< nal). The property is located at 320 W Hallam 1 Notary Public Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of As-~ 0 / sÂ»nAH j a pen. The proposal is for the construction of anl ogres :j * addition to an existing house. For further infor-4 mation, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen,|2- Community Development Department. 130 S. Ga-,1 lena St., Aspen. CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.as-~ Â«z-~.........-Â·Â·~~69 pen.co.us Â»2122 s/Jeffrey Halferty, Chair A Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in The Ast en Times on June 21,2004 (0530) ' ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL -immr-1 ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -320 Lueer- HALLAF'l Â« , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: WED , yuLY 9-1-H , log-3 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, DEEK -*AUÂ© 0/0 JUN *,6 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (IE) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 6 ha /53 Publication of notice By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 6715/03 Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 19 day of J UNE , 2005, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 4 la /63 Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) K .. . ~|~ Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. AfÂ«_ Signature The feregoing "Affidavit of Notif" was acknowledged before me this l~> day of c kkt-01 , 200=5 by OP/VOL_ 6\1Â» ITIC) WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: *Alloco 1 MORGAN M 1 < <* FRAZIER jO j --4 k(140~i>4 071 Notary Pub(~ My Commisclon Expires 9/12/2006 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. 4 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 320 W. HALLAM- MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 9,2003 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Judy Haas, requesting approval for Major Development (Final). The property is located at 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal is for the construction of an addition to an existing house. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us s/Jeffrey Halferly, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 21, 2003 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160Â® . . 0 ' 212 Â»SECOND ST LLC , ALLEN ROBERT H & JUDY LEY BARKER JACK 1/2 INT C/O RICHARD CORBETT 4545 POST OAK PL STE 101 PO BOX 7943 2202 N WEST SHORE BLVD STE 110 i ~ HOUSTON, TX 77027 , ASPEN, CO 81612 , * 'A, FL 33607-5749 i I 1, BENNINGHOFF ESTHER BLEVINS J RONALD & PHYLLIS M ' CITY OF ASPEN 1 233 W HALL-AM AVE 20320 FAIRWAY OAKS DR #353 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33434 ASPEN, CO 81611 CONNOR F HAYDEN 1 COOPER JOHN T |, ~ COX CAROLYN M 444 GRAPE ST ~i PO BOX 1747 961 PASEO DEL SUR DENVER, CO 80220 SPRINGFIELD, MO 65802 ~ ~ SANTA FE, NM 87501 DEVOS ESTHER LEONARD DIIANNI DONNA M , DOBBS JOHN C & SARA F PO BOX 3238 323 w HALLAM ST PO BOX 241750 ASPEN, CO 81612 ,' ASPEN, CO 81611 MEMPHIS, TN 38124 1 EPPLER KLAUS TRUSTEE P FIRESTEIN CHESTER & BEVERLY ~ ' FISCHER SISTIE PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 501 442 W BLEEKER MENDELSHON ASPEN, CO 81611 ' ~ BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 2255 GLADES RD #340 W BOCA RATON, FL 33431 FIVE CONTINENTS ASPEN REAL-TY FRIEDBERG BARRY S GALLANT MARILYN C/O EDWARDS JOSEPH 111 555 PARK AVE 7W 617 VINE ST STE 1430 502 MAI N ST STE 201 i NEW YORK, NY 10021 , CINCINNATI, OH 45202 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ' JONES STEPHEN MARTIN TRUST IV HOUGH JENNINE JANSS MARY TRUST 500 CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY N 265 BRIGHTON RD NE 403 W HALL-AM BLD 6 STE 125 ATLANTA, GA 30309 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN, TX 78746 11 1 11 MCANIFF RICHARD J KINNEY STEPHEN J & SUSAN M KOUTSOUBOS TED A C/O CORNERSTONE ADVISORS P O BOX 330010 415 E HYMAN AVE #206 777 108TH AVE NE SUITE 2000 MIAMI, FL 33233 ' ASPEN, CO 81611 BELLEVUE, WA 98004-5118 MULLINS DON R MOSS CHARLOTTE , MYERS JOSEPH V JR % HARDING & CARBONE 555 PARK AVE 7W 421 W HALLAM ST 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD NEW YORK, NY 10021 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77025 NEISSER JUDITH E REV TRUST 1~AN REVOCABLE TRUST PATRICK JAMES K C/O BERNADETTE REED 71'rN UNDEN DR 417 W HALLAM ST 3281 GRAFTON LN BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81611 ' AURORA, IL 60504 ~~AMERYÂ® Address Labels Laser 5160Â® Sniooth Feed Sheetsâ„¢ Use template for 5160Â® ,, .. PEARLSTONE ESTHER S ' PENINSULA LLC POTVIN SALLY ALLEN ~ PO BOX 8750 ' PO BOX 6594 320 W BLEEKER ST ASDEN, CO 81612 , SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 , ASPEN, CO 81611 RIGGS ASPEN TRUST RISPOLI PETER SAX JOEL D 6815 BALTIMORE DR 323 W HALLAM ST ' 303 W FRANCIS ST DALLAS, TX 75205 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SCHLOFFER BRUNHILDE P , SIRKIN ALICIA SMART PAMELA PO BOX 941 3500 S BAYHOMES DR 1040 W CONWAY DR ~ ASPEN, CO 81612 MIAMI, FL 33133 ATLANTA, GA 30305 STEEPLECHASE PARTNERS LLC STILWELL REED & CLAIRE TEAGUE LEWIS TRUST PO BOX 10686 191 UNIVERSITY BLVD #714 862 NORTH BEVERLY GLEN BLVD ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80206 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 TITUS JOHN & JOAN REV TRST WEISE RICHARD H 3025 BRYN MAWR 5451 N E RIVER RD #503 DALLAS, TX 75225 i CHICAGO, IL 60656 ~AVERYÂ® Address Labels Laser 5160Â® .. ... , ' 7. t. ~'t .Ar 4* 'r % 1. 9 PUBLIC NOTICE DATE T.ME PLACE PURPOSE PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 7/9 /03 TIME 5:COM COUNCIL CHA/'\BER5 PLACE 130 ~ GALENk *T C Inf 1 JALL PURPOSE HEE _li[EEL-_REVIEW- 320 -EMILe\Ll- AA 5-E ~ 13 OCK lIZ A*SPE N : f.11~. 320 Oak Lane Aspen, CO 81611 1 fri day Phone: 970.544.0695 Fax: 970.920.7822 des; /-1 'abo at'.e To: The Aspen Historic Preseivation From: Judy Haas, Owner 320 W. Hallam St. Commission Derek Skalko, Principal 1 Friday Design Collaborative Fax: Date: June 10 2003 Phone: 970.920.5090 Pages: 1 Re: 320 West Hallam Street - Pan Abode CC: Judy Haas Dear Amy, Katie & Members of the Commission, Attached you will find the following information pertaining to HPC Final Review of 320 West Hallam Street. We hope you find the packet helpful in explaining our proposed project material choices, lighting fixtures, and door and window locations. We thank you all for your time in reviewing the information and look fotward to working with you through the construdion of this project as we anticipate to begin this coming September. This induded information is as follows: Explanation Diagram of the Proposed Bridge Condition: We felt this shoukl be included to further assist in explaining why the height of the connection is flush to the existing pan-abode roof (even in its current state, we feel strongly the proposed connection adheres to HPC Design Guideline 10.7 in its entirety) and why we feel the best solution is the proposed solution. Exterior Lighting Specification & Location Diagram: We plan to have two exterior lights on the proposed addition (both of which are to meet UBC Code Requirements) The specific fixture, dimensions, and the exact exterior locations are diagrammed accordingly Exterior Materials Palette Diagram: Colour renderings labeled accordingly to proposed material selections for the exterior surfaces. Architectural Drawings Packet: Cover Sheet Plans (Lower, Main, Roof & St. Context) Existing & Proposed Survey Plats (Site Plan) Proposed Elevations Project Vicinity Map Proposed Sections Existing Pan-Abode Conditions (Plan & Elevations) Proposed Window & Door Schedule Thank you very much, Derek Skalko Principal, 1 Friday Design Collaborative connection area: ex~nation the proposed link between the existing pan - abode structure and the new construction is proposed as a flush roof condition for the reasons following a Ihe property has an existing cottonwood tree that has been required to remain. we C are Proposing a link that is as far recessed from the tree as possible while still adhereing - to design guideline 10.7 being over 10' in :Â·/0.4 mir H separation lenght, one story in height. and b construction a minimum ot V all 01 these Ill , setting itself back from the existing 27 1 Ty#irill - aspects would be visually noticable. lowering r 3.11.-, ir 10 1>5-1 . i< the roof condition would not R.. F ' b. uniform building code (which all building construction in the city of aspen must conform to) states that a minimum height - of 7'-0' must be achieved in any space f I ' deemed habitable as you can see by the -t:- Â»6Â».\Â· .85,0. two diagrams, we actually only satisfy the 140056,06, 'DAOGCOE minimum condition in the upper scenario the city would be willing to grant approval only to the upper scheme situated at a existing floor .. u a low height of 7'-0" the reason this is an issue is due to the low nature of the interior . plate heights of the pan-abode structure. *'hich for this case is 6'-8" at the sides ~ distance must be maintained per park department please keep in mind most victorians (which functional: section requirement to preserve cottonwood tree the guidelines are traditionally used for) average interior plate heights between 9' and 11'-6'.even miner's cabins in this town typically range from 8' to 8'-9" in observations by lowenng the connection and taking into account the necesssary structure. you would have an interior space of approximately 5'110 in height. this would be absolutely unacceptable to all parties, a flat roofed option was studied and the resulting condition . put a portion of the roof above the existing __ plane of the pan-abode roof min -'Ir'.MT::i:26 c the structural compostion of the pan-abode t.Â·-:. <Si,554 - i ---3~r-, Â· most log cally supports a continuing roof due to the fact the building is built like real life lincoln logs, with all of the roofs structural support originating in the cross members of the overlapping wall construction By tying ' Ej Â·Â· -0 iE i Â· + > into Ihe structure below this roofline. you have to to tie in below the existing roof at a minimum, which once again brings us to lack of interior height. it also creates a detail condition that proves suseptable to . freeze thaw ice damning conditions and . =4:1 9%000Â¢AA .;MOODC'60 , water penetration where the new and old construction meet. both of which would not i be favorable to the preservation of the existing floor . 1 . 'UU==2+79\ historic structure. ~ c stance oust se maintained per park departmen: non-functioning: section requirement to preserve cottonwood tree 9 0 + 7 ..: T connection placed for Maximum distance from ~ existing cottonwood i - k.11i 1 11'i' 1 11:1 1,1-:-liLli lITYÂ»-:aull'i r 1,â€¢mactÂ·(,1 Â· - - Â·Â· - -Â· - -----Â·- Â· 11L1- A. 444 ..lef 1-Uju:-3- C. I.,; 4,Imâ€¢,4. ,+1/2. 13339.0 11 !1 :.11 Â·ty -11_titiki .- Â· Â·Â·1 Â·- -U!%41 11 f. - * i :1; J ---l .111 i 11 '.! 11- 1 1Â£ ill Amkle 111 -1 61:.. ....i:Â· ' I_LE - tr -r --i. *291,gj2&4.-1.- U :i- w 11 4. ...:.;L. 2...1"-L.L.1 .../. ..4 . i L ' .-/4AJ....'. ...i--UU-/.-U- 7-4/*b-. i-Â·T-~~~i, 14 Ll' 7 =-~ I 1 1 - i i i '.3 , 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 5 maintainina seamless roof condition allows for better - 1, *t .5 exterior light fixtures 0 J A , 1, 1, 2-81, 1, 1 '' P . l A i' -/.. i two exterior RAB incandescent - 1 ' f... .th- 1 1& A jelly-jar/ with metal cage fixtures -Al' i 1Â£ ( , 11~ /8, Z j i /2/'-1 hi ~ 2 ' . -, 1 1 will be used on the new addition the fixture and its dimensions ....0. li l:*112..1,11.1.1. 1 are pictured and highlighted MP 3 tei Ailrl-4 . ..1 k -4.11 = 2 fe, fl. 14 â€¢fy f h., 4 1 accordingly below 1 V H / 4 L 4 1-n i 06 7 L_1_ F ~ j 4 ; - T.31---1> 7 L VT- 1 ''Â»tm-5/ G . Kik il 4 i p it U V 1 7Â¢f 1-[-3 r--lri 1 + .r ABr- --Ukj tj i c 1 -_ _13~A1 I 7- - -f-71-7 ----35244.- i _r/l - E - D t ABCDEFGHI VXBR100DG 9-5/8 9-1/8 6-7/8 4-1/8 3-3/8 4-1/4 5-1/8 7-1/8 24.4 23.5 17.5 10.5 10.8 10.5 13.0 18.1 VXBR10OG 10-1/4 9-1 48 7-1/2 4-3/8 3-3/8 4-1 /4 5-1/8 7 26.0 23.5 19.0 11.1 10.8 10.5 13 0 17.8 VXBR10OP (PW) 8-1/4 3-3/4 4-1/4 5-1/8 7 21.0 10.8 10.5 130 17.8 VXBR200DG 11-1/4 10-5/8 8-5/8 5-3/8 4-1/4 4-1 /4 5-1/8 8-1/8 28.6 27.0 21 9 13.7 10.8 10.5 13.0 20.6 VXBR200G 11-7/8 10-5/8 9-1/8 5-3/8 4-1/4 4-1/4 5-1/8 8 30.2 27.0 23.2 13.7 10.8 10.5 130 20.3 VXBR200P (PW) 10-5/8 4-3/4 4-1/4 5-1/8 8 97 A l A Q 12, C 11A on G .. W.'d.19 west habri % .,"....... judy haas residence L - -9-1 1 11 I 1 1 /-97/1/'ll'.F , , N j' 2 1~ iii 1, 1 5 ' 11121-11111M~-*1 proposed east elevation ( east elevation on variance request) note. window has been altered from rendering ~ refer to architectural elevations for upper -~~ *1&1lt ~ window /,telllqm a. '& l~Â·{ im-w- r-clrT- , + EfF?ihil lrY ./.4/r. proposed courtyard elevalion = luniti I.Il exterior materials 1 kai-wai translucent panels proposed alley elevation (rear yard for variance) 2 cedar shingles 3 1*6 reclaimed baÂ·nwood siding 4 rusted corrugated metal sheeting 5 refinished pan-abode exterior 6 1*4 clear dalned cedar 7 exposed aggregate concrete 8 efco anodized aluminum storefront system 9 lexan Iranslucent sheeling 10 pella clad window system 11 pella wood window system 12 standing seam metal roofing 1. 91., Â· I -*** 1 13 quantum wood doo, system 1. - ..W. 1 1 119 i 1 113 131 -1 6 0 0....----------I--- 6... :P," . 1 1 <Fi- EE. r.1- -6 n ML ----D- , I â€¢- 1 /&16, M Wttlillll 5 I i - 1 -r , proposed west elevation (west elevation on vanance request) .. d 7'5 proposed landscape plan Atvoâ‚¬NT \ 0009 $ O r - sED y we are prooosina a minimal landscape tor the prolect atthe current time due to the very limited space available on the site U O the current and neiohboring historic lots are primarily kentuaky blue grass as they now exist. all areas indicated. by the light Green are Dropsed to maintain 'this as a Kentucky tiluearass or grass approprate for the aspen clinrate A.Wami j all circles in. forest Green represent existing 2-7-1 1 i ..m"/1- trees. that will rema n on .t e proposed site the circles with red dots in the center are recuired to siay in accordance with the dir&ction of the aspen parks department aU areas hiahliahted in tan to be representative 1 L.: 1 - 1 - of areas prdpo#ed to have sporadically -*, .-,02Â£E1, .~. 6 - I set natural flaastone pieces. the oath to the pan-@bode entty (towards the botrom of the rÂ»/ 2 4 .. r 1, : Dage) is currently a concrete walk that follows 1... r. i. 14. the same line ot orientation. so no changes '.* 1. '. 9,:= ' 4 '$ i' ./ $ to the direction of the path are intended the prosed path to the entry from h#11#m currently measures beteen 3 and 3 -6' I we intend to maintain this wi*and would more than likely be between & 3'-0" -Â·,1 0 V~V-'/ [J 0 1 1 121. 3-t 3 3 11 1 T...1.; ~ li ~Â·i- it .. 1 11. i 1 1 ilÂ·-- , /7 0 J 1 31 '22,7 k .9 : .*tâ€¢ c---.-Ils/DE --*- .pâ€¢ke o c -17 -' 22# 0 'In'W> <(1 0 "' image of flagstone I.F.- . rn .. proposed sklight depiction for 320 west hallam we have included this photoaraDh In the review packet to better halo ~~dpict the proposed skylight,for the ition,. as the photograph indicates svklight detail as proposed for 320 west.hallam the sAL'~2,t protrudes above the Dhotdaragn taken frQm HPC award Winning ridgeli tesiddhca completed in 2000 by studio b architects we would also. like to state where this esidence is situated o a corner lot ~20 west hallam rests Getreer,two structures both 6 hiahe intended constructidfl. Fisigly. Ytrwill bedjfficult to actually see aoy portion of 320 s Skylight froM the primary viewing lines on west hallam street EL- e. â€¢ Wtillilillim#ilimiladll"".- fÂ»%(ff,% 71Â£*&4*~BM//10"'-b 1 2 34.- t - I. .,. i ic ~ Â·Â·Â·. - ' IR $5 4 ir Al r 4.- 4* 1 91 . , ' E Qi * . e.4 , 4% _.-,W/#%. . 0, 4 Â·- :-1---73/I'li Of ... JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL REVIEW DIRECTORY INDEX July 9th, 2003 2-ELN-E.2 JUDY HAAS A.O COVER SHEET / ~NTACT REFERENCE / FAR CALCULATIONS po box 530 LOT LINE ADJJSTMENT PLAT . aspen, colorado 81612 SURVEY ,No VICINITY MAP - 520 PEST HALLAM PROPERTY tel 910.925. 6545 tel (studio) 470 .425. 8810 Aj PROPOSED> SITE ANC> TOPOeRAPHIC PLAN Fax 410.425.5540 KID EXISTINe HISTORIC CONDITIONS DOCUMENTATION All LOFER E MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED PLANS #<22 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS 4 CONTEXT ELEVATION DESIBNERS: ONE FRIDAY DESIeN COLLABORATIVE. LLC. /8.1-3.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS derek m. skalko; principal designer A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS judy haas; project designer AIO.1 MINDOV41 1 POOR SCHEDULE 320 oak lane aspen, colorado 81611 tel 410.304.0645 Fax <10.420.7522 <2' f 11 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS: 6LENkNOOD STRUCTURAL 4 CIVIL; INC. .jim romeo, professional engineer consulting structurol engineers a i 2425 south grand avenue, suite 102 glenwood springs. colorado 81601 d tel 470.428.0135 Fax q70.428.4804 6-ENERAL CONTRACTOR: y design collaborative, llc. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS sky Zoning: Re Lot Area: 3000 SG. FT. EaR Maximum Allowable Floor Â»eo: 1,500 50. FT IW#f#treff'#N~%MtÂ«Â«At'~8%+N#~14%*tAN# Gross Area (st) IrffrFT[-TFITTFTJ[mT7TT177a-rTm71TTETF-Ernr-FrIT-FrrinT87-fr[Trl EI[UIyEIFULEUrtti-F-nT-IrTEjVPTrmrfOTTr-1 Item [[IUllITI U U 111.}-U-1 U L[ 11 U u 111]In-OTEFUT-ri]-R-ii -ifT[-FÂ«77--771 â€¢ Main Level L.LEPL~-f][fyi4[[flhAgFFFPKINKKWiN[[[[*JEWÂ©[[EJE~ (included: pan-abode 1,3-78 i Â£ main level addition) ' Lo,Ner Level 15OA lilli ~1111 1 Illi countable towards FAR) 0.1 percent of lower level (76,q countable) 111111 1 TOTALS 1,454.9 1,454.9 < 1500 - FAR Is OK Notes: Al 74 10-r leval (600 sq FL * pIa) consists of o sq. lootoge of Iiall area 20' x 30 x q-bâ€¢ M depth. The M.ver laval /10 contave o Inght Yell of 3Â· x q'-6â€¢ * 6'8â€¢ a depth, #.9/9 the total r,011 surface ./al of the 10-er level / 5,6-75.5 sq Feet of IMF/Ge (rea. Of this total. the light -11 Graa /â€¢d 6' of perinater area cre-d the structure ,Â·4111 be e,~osed. brk,ging the /,Â¥,owre parc-toge to 4755 sq. Ft. which Gints lo~ 8.1% e,qoosurs to ba used ogahit FAR- iii iii UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT ~ ~ SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT i N SCALE ... ) -91Ek SET -- --- -- ALLEY BLOCK 2 1 INCH = 10 FEE T - U 0 5 10 15 20 . -33*72 /1/- I *D .. <07 M - '40 i j SIED 8 1 ..#Ap i n CLIC & CDIC n . EASEMENT 6 ! * 52â€¢ PO 928 LOT . k . M i ! i i i . --- i j / P.710 LOT O 12 / i LEGEND & NOTES - ik / 1 j / O FOLIO SUNCY IOUENT REPR MTH CAP AS NOTED 2 :r{.. N SPI KE [Â»t P-K WI L StÂ»NCY CIÂ»(TRER- 1 LOT P POSTED ADDRESS IS * 304 AND 320 MIST 1,4LLAN ST â€¢ 44 / &4/4 0 -8- won recE j h . i~*9 36â€¢ 16-, 44 / -*- M RE FENCE 2'i* 94- 2 4.; O UTILITY BOX ..122 22 ZB Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFOR,â‚¬R cITY .04.ENT ! 9*57 49 0% i i SET CENIER â€¢C 4 REW wITH RED CAP 16129 13-9-02 LOT O .... / TITLE DEORMATION WAS FLENISHED BY, P]TKIN COMVTÂ¥ TITLE, INC. ~ DATEI .uâ‚¬ 27,2002 COMM[DENT NO- PCT-17086L 4,94**Â«r - 4 ... . 1 ~~ CON[FER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED . --I 4 I .. . . f .. 1~ DECIDUOUS TREE CAL[PER SIZE AS ~]TED i m C*Â· - 2' - -ur j' ~~S~N~14:RE RECID FROM Tlâ‚¬ 1939 CFFICAL MAP Cy TIâ‚¬ PI'â‚¬ . 2-2Â¥ :j j .. i i i VI 0 V-N / I ! 4 .. , .413,99. .OIl.-= 0 73,09'trw) . r. - h -101 . /0/ Cli Emih SET -m - W I... ..'tw.U .FE,/ W.L 4 f IMPROVEMENT SURVEY Gurrce ..mey TNEST 41LLAANY PI TKI N COUNTY. COLORADO LOTS N. 0. & P. BLOCK 42. CITY & TO&NSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET p.Ip.RED .v ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. NIC[*El I. TO Cat-DO 'Al ./ /,ST CD,CNCE ANY .... ACTI C. 210 S GALINA STREET IASO -Â»1 -ff mEJECT IN â„¢IS PLAT ITHIN Tâ€¢*I YEARS AFTER Â¥91 ASPEN. C[1[1 81 61 1 ri .T liscoâ‚¬*, SLK]1 1[rECT 1 N . c... 1,~V A,rf .TI. DASCD PICÂ»â‚¬/FAX <970) 925-3816 m M IrEC, I * ng I w K Mi/3,CED ,-Â£ TI- TOI YEARS E-MAIL "vieasp-nfacom , FRDÂ¢ TIC ... .. TIC CERTI Fl CATI O. $1094 1,[32[IX .Job na 32155 NO' 25 2002 C SHEET 2 OF 2 . ~ir <4. UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT .. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT N A C.-WL Q...rk SCALE =T --- - 1 INCH â€¢ 10 FEET ALLEY * ; BL Ock 42 0 5 20 15 20 -. 74#/30 40 ..1 LOT Â· - â€¢40 Y#* . .i 2 btb a i i i LOT N i 1 ! a k 1 --- i f , PATIO LOT : 5% 2 . 0 i i LEGEND & NOTES O FOR.IND SLACY 10*/ENT REIR W TH CIP AS NOTED e â€žapp .6 4 e SPIKE OR P-K NII L SURnâ‚¬r CtÂ»,TROL *04 i POSTED ADDRESS IS '304 AND 320 EST #84[.LAN ST â€¢ '%/r#t , N U.-1,~36. CAF j j -6- WOD FENCE 4%â€¢r , - M RE FENCE o Ullu. . 7:4,<F <44 ~ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER CITY 'OUCIT ! i SET CCNNER PÂ«1 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP 16129 U-9-02 =Jer -I-. 1. .. j LO, 0 j' ~ .~ j TITLE â€¢rER,â€¢Arl[,4 WAS FURNISâ€¢â‚¬D RY, PITKIN C[]~ITY TITLE. INC. - . ,..~ / . DATED .Uâ‚¬ 27.2002 . co-[TMENT .1 PCT-17086L 899941Â£*.,t 2- 4 ,... 1. . i / le' 44 -- . i ~ CONIFER TREE CAUPER SIZE AS IOTED '4- ..:.1 : . ULLS UN H ARE RECORD FR[/ Dâ‚¬ 1959 5/ICAL MAP [r Tâ€¢â‚¬ ~~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED Ttl CAP . PINE CITY [r ASPEN- ! i i ,.... i -:.. 7 . O - 4 / 3999. l . 'Els ,~ -0 '41 i i 04 7300911Â·W> .. ...32 -VC e- -4 -C ED C- S.Cl WALL 0/ CMR & GUTTER I MPROVEMENT SURVEY WEST ' PITKI N COUNTY. COLORADO LOTS N. 0. & P, BLOCK 42. CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCt*.1 16 10.Cl.[Â»CADO LAW 'r[*1 1Â«JST C[10Â«I ANY LEGN. ACTI [Â»1 210 S. GALINA STREET . DASE.'DI ANÂ¥ ILFECT I I T. S 'LAT W THI I hÂ«LE YEARS 'frER val ASPEN. C[*/1 81 611 fIRST DISCO,CRO SUCH 10'ECT IN W EINT. MY // ACTICÂ»1 'SED PHOFâ‚¬/FAX (970) 925-3816 LF[Â»1 ANÂ¥ mUCCT I N TIC $ PLAT . CO,OICO )0~Â£ D- TOI vt,â€¢AS rED, T.. ..[ . T. CERTI I CATI [Â»1 DOWâ€¢ 1â‚¬RECk JOI no, 32155 NOV 25. 2002 E-MAIL davee'*pe'"11'ocom SHEET 2 OF 2 '49.0 1 .lilili,1 1 pl.G leeM - uedsv JO 40 W Â§:Si:%318' PeRS welleH 01Â£ 2 eouepisekl seeH *Pnr , 112 j ~~ Thismap/drawing/image Isagraphkal representallon ofthe features depicted md is nol alegal ~ ~ depending on the er,largement or red iction, ~5fntatinn Theac~,iracvmavolanq, ~, 2003 Cltv of Aâ€¢pen/Pitkin c ounty W FRANCIS ST EVE. **% s 2%15% '':29 1 491*a - 2*Imm .&*fy.â€žm. C. J 0 - W HALLAM ST -- .. : 1/ : /&/11/ 4@{:4:.' 1 , 4%* 223**St *423 ' LAWSTA' â„¢E INFORMA AND DESI -15 WV11VH A OZE N SECOND ST N THIRD ST .... f r 43> a y design Collaborative,110 ~ aspen colorado 81611 320 oak lane I phone(970).309.0695 ' fax 070.920.7822 1 || ENTRY 1 2 BEDROOM -=- 13 KITGHEN ~ (7<*ATH ' ~~ ') 'Â© ,Â®nk@,tudlobarchnicts net Â®E E -*a- 4 -4 O 2003 OfE FRIDAY DESIGN CollABORATIVE LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAÂ»ED ON TMS DOCUMENT IS TIE | T}*S INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR PROPERTY OF ONE FAMY DESIGN COLLABORATME L.L.C. NO PART OF EE c ----_- _-_ COPIED V,TrH0UTTHEPRI0RWR1TTEN -----EBEEBEE---2622 E-_BEE-bEE- -3 PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DES,GN COLLABORATIVE LLC ONE FREDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY A% ALL OTHER RESERVED mGHTS, 1 1 L - ~j~ - -~~i --i-~-~ -ill --~- j-~ -M-~ - - --~-Ii -Ii - .&1~ .~~~iM~ - -~ --__1 2003 p- ----------------- ------------------ -/ i LIVING AREA OFFICE 2 / 1 3 EXISTING PLAN - PANABODE c33 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) c53 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 0 A-HISSEALE:-M=-EB' EFE' \4~!3/ SCALE: 1/4-= 1.-0" 423/ SCALE: 1/4Â·=1'-0- E - 0 co iB a I 0 <C â‚¬ g o J A = 0 t 1 1 ~Dic]~ 8.4 1121 h Rooâ€¢LÂ»e Ae,ovE Construction bid/le: EhT CONDITIONS (23 EXISTING ROOF PLAN - PANABODE X AL EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) (63 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION H LUM STREET A-HES-SCALEW=-1:ii: 57= 1 E5r*EXEEFiZEEB:~ ~H~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" Sheet # A-HIS eouepiseN seeH pu3 }seM - I ... \Ct) . i /-2.) \%3-: iN,-9,2 '7 f d a 1 '1953> y 1 I des gn collaborative,Ilc 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 / h E--------1 -- -2 ....11 phone (970). 309. 0695 FÂ· -- - ---- 1 fax (970).920.7822 1 /\ derek@,tudiobâ€¢rchit~cti.net r-Â· 1 1 1 E--- 18 R I 7 â€¢ 10'-6 19 /~ AA i\el STATR MECHANICAL- Â· --" ~12- ,~ - V li 5-... n 0 'reeN O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABOUTIVE ALC â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN NrENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS TE L_ J COLLABORATIVE LL.C NO PART OF -6.- 1 i PROPERTY OF ONE FRiDAY DESIGN --Â· BEDROOM ! PEN - / â„¢IS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR - I 63'' PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COPIED WITHOUT â„¢E PRIOR WRITTEN L, COUABORATIVE LLC. IE FRIDAY -- -_- RETAINALLCOMMONLAWSâ„¢TUTORY DESIGN COLLABOFUTWE LLC. SHALL- I AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 2 COPYRIGHT 2003 7---------1 13-3 L___J -1 .. f MECHANICAL ~) BATH CLOSET i .' -=-- = 1 jAI e r N _ _In , u =, 1 1 4. 1 1 1 6 11 (D 1 1 0- | g CO 1 1 1 1 /n 6,1 49, e. / 1 7 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN // 1 c/ 2.1 ~ 0 1 05 E ~2.~ SCALE: 1/40 - 1'-0â€¢ 2 11([~10 m 2 I Antl EM C ee k f CL k /001 KEE7 \31 (11 f Gh (9 (/63 (fi) 1 17 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 In 10 M el c M ! ' 1- - .- --2- el Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· 'LI ru-1 - - C ---~ W Â«*9~11 TTILLT 11â‚¬-1,/'-1 0- LIVING AREA 1Â· . -992-.-4'~ En - KITCHEN Â«>221-2 : L - A/- 3 1 UL..L.........Â£ K TCHEN ISLANI~ --n 12 0- 141 0 03~PEKE 3 . ~~ - 1 GATHERINe AREA P i. ~ --- .... ---- 14= 1/ . --p-- 1 EA j MUD AREA | - DININe AREA BRIDGE - E P , 6 \ 11 , E -SH | ORÂ¥ |, REF Â§ \ 11 / 1 --3, - 1 gl --_JIL__-.311 Â·Â·L- - 11- --Ir---7, - Â· 1 ~ 1 1- t.- â€ž. . ---- ...2 -- . TWI.) r ,n 1 13 0 0 - e U 05 -- - U Rev. 1 1 11 0 -7 Construdjon i=ue dateÂ· ~ ~ i ?IBEED PLANS 1 320. HALUM STREET d) (23 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN d , 9, LE, 45 c, 1) li 1 .1 1 11 ~2~i].,~ SCALE : 1/4- = 1.-0. A-2.1 , ~EJE 11 puEI meM - uedsv Jo *1!0 .... C A..1, f f Oa ded 9 1- : 37 a 1, . 41 0 5'-30 y des gn collaborative,llc. -553 Kil~-1 0 ~ â€¢ 320 oak lane 0 aspen colorado 81611 r---- r- -------1 m phone (970) , 309.0695 1 \ r ELIZE 1 1 12 RI 7 = 10Â· 0 19' L. 11~ ..T--I...C=...e : 42 ....11 ' 1 1 1 F------- 1 fax (970) .920.7822 -Ill g | derek@studlebarchitictÂ®.net 21 \ / 1 \01 ST*fR & AA / ~ ~ MECHANICAL r i il , 5-.11. 29 Â·meN 9 8 O 2003 'E FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATrVE LLC. 1 2 11 I L- . - CONTAIMED ON THIS DOCLNENT IS T}â‚¬ THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN NTENT C PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN BEDROOM >EN | COLLABORAIVE LLC. NO PART OF - --- . THIS IFORMATION MAY BE USED OR i . Â«i) Â· - - -- PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COPIED Â¥YTHOUT THE PRIORWRITTEN 8 - M 0- - -- 2 DESIGN COLLABORATTIE LLC. SHAU COLLABORAnVE LLC. O,Â£ FRIDAY - 14*1 w ----3 RETAIN AU COMMON LAW MAILITORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 1 -CLM----1 COPYRIGHT 2003 I I.> I El Y f-----4 2-Â«8 MECHANICAL ~ BATH 1 CLOSET .-' 'E) .- - ' 1~h ~~.-1-725 rj 1 U L.1 I . Â·tk---,r~ #7L' 9 V .2 ~ 1 4 15'-11 e Â¢ f e. 1 1 . 1 , 3' 12 22' 1 f 30' 11Â· STÂ· e t (3 (i) L. - L (3-' / 1 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN ~ SCALE: 1/4Â·= 1,-0- 81 rcc~ , .0/ C.411 97 / 2 (F) F) 2 1 30Â· 11Â· L I 1" f 3~2Zf,-'kiÂ· ~ 8'-5~' 4'-2~ , 2'-10:~' -2'-5~Â· /,-2'Lq~ 34Â· 1.-5. 11Â·-8- .11 - 41 qÂ· . RD '.O I â€¢ Re . I 1 1 1 41//f Â«991 - 1 1-00 4 q 3 , fe 4, M 73- ' .. 0 - "01/ - 10 CO 11 U. 17 <D 1--An 1 ENÂ·re~ ~ ;[f 'i' '221(21 TOILET 1- . . - 4 14/ ,Â© 4 ~, CLOSET Lli/iNs ARE* O 173 T KITCHEN 4 - 4 3 n _ __ _ ~i~ E --c----1 i~~- ==7----- ---- --- ---- -- Te 4 4% h ...1.------- r': [ijin g 1. 0...1 . 9 2 ~ Â· - 4,4 : E- 1 , 102 '1. 3 m GOUITTYARIP &- 33.5% 0 E------ ------1-------L--, - Â·' 2- - [122 1 52 1 \Mt- J<i> :1 R ~-*~~ CD in|p=~0-Y] 3 - 1 1 -en- K TCHEN ISLANI~ . I ..12 4-~ 1 . i . -r--/./ 1 te3 ) 1 GATHERING AREA 1 L,1 mir--R-=1 I 9 2 i MWU-AEA 1 4 7 fÂ« -2\ BRIDGE DINING AREA ~ : E f -M U 1.-- 1 r.-- . \ )HALL .L -I.' > 21 9 d E :-9 REFF ./ 11 -/ / IiiÂ· r.ar,--i ..:1 ~ : Â· = * -LL -Â·Â·Â· <D . -,1 -* , --ir---1-unipuzz~ â‚¬ p ~~1 elâ€¢Lj - -4 2 0 Rev. 0 15 -6Â· , 4,-2â€¢ 4 3'-5~' , 2â€¢-3â€¢ , 6'-6. , 22Â·-3- , 3' . L ..1- 2'-4- L n. Consbuction R.O. %'. ./. I .. I PROPOSED PLANS RO 1. k 4. e 15' 22 320 HALUM STREET .. (~ (2>PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN u KE, 45, 18' /-4 /7 I 1 9-# \A2.1/ SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-0- -2 2 0 IA-2. I eouepseTSelt't pLIEI iseM - uedsv JO *1!0 .... ee f CC 1. CO Al.1 CA.J, A4% y f design collaborative,llc. 1 1 Ill 1 'FUE FOR GAS Fl~-â€¢1-~= 1 1 ' 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81511 phone(970) .309. 0695 fax (970) .920. 7822 I-mill â„¢~ i li q i ' ~ I~ derekestudiob,rchliects.net 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11,1 1 1 :1 1 1 ___ -=.wn O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN E-0// IX' COLLABORATIVE lLC. | i I ' i...OBEAPPLICO THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN NTENT 1 1 OVER TOP CONTAÂ»ED ON THS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONIE FRiDAY DESIGN COLLABORATME L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 1 , COPIED wrn,OUTTHEPRIORWRITTEN 4 I - -f , , 1111 1 1 11 1 1 111 RETAIN ALL Co-oN LAW STATUTORY PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1. COLLABORATTIE LlC. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORIVE LLC. SHALL 1 3 CEE CEDAR SHINSUES COPYRIGHT 2003 ABI ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, RIOGE VENT 2 -P Â« - 1 SIC IGHT 1 11 1 11 1 1 11 Â» 11 12 1 ) i 11.Ll 1 j j.1 1] 11 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- i - - - I - ---4--- 1 1 -4 8 _M 11 4, 1 5001 1 1 11 1 /:* f A Â£11PROPOSED_*QQEPLAN u, E g 1 il 1 J-~ 1 of E ' L' ~ SCALE: 1/4Â· =: 10-6"---~ L ~. k--E-, 43/ L EFJ 2rj~ m -E a. - 0 4- â‚¬g o â‚¬ 2Â· 23 1 1 1 1 lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1.-1 1 33~1__ Const'uction Dra,ing nk PROPOSED ROOF FUN & ONTEXT ELEVATION Sheet / Â£23-PRQEQSEQ_CQNI EXT ELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET A-2.2 SCALEE 3/16' = 1'-0' .... f r f f i 1 1 n f 1 1 design collaborative'llc. IT,0 K/L-rNAL SK/LleHT 320 oak lane C=~==42T~I~f~~~EZErrZ36*~~ aspen colorado 81611 phone (970).309.0695 T-ELBriiamâ„¢-0,0 f a x 970) .920.7822 1 1 Luct-En~COZE~EO~EZEEEmnlaulul-7 d,rd-tudlobarchltects nat IUULLLI LUL LE_U_1 21]1[-ILLL11.11 [111.11 U U 11 LI U 11 L] 3.11 U LIli 1-11-1.11.11 1 1 lilli I ATI 0 2003 OME FRIDAY DESIGN 1 COUABORATIVE LE. C. i i 19*Flft I I li w I r 1 I i Ii H li " Il 1 I c I illi?1 11[19 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN .ITENT CONTAINED ON â„¢IS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERrY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATTVE LLC. NO PART OF I~fillifuldi41111lglilinlq1~01611[ tri-1--1--1--1--1--iraiLLMILÂ£_11.JL111LI I TO. PLATE rÂ»11,46 8//AUr THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR COPIED V,rnÂ«]LIT THE PRIOR WRITTEN * TO PLAIE BRIC>SE LOPV PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. SHALL ELEV. 108'-O' COLLABORATIVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY Ell=~ + 1 .0 All OTHER RESERVED aIGHTS. 'Jl'Â· ~LEVEL RETAIN ALL CO-ON LAW STATUTORY aJ5'O,A ,AU.1,!P LN?r 3 .- g.r COPYâ„¢GMT 2003 1 111 1 1Â£12112-J 11 1 41 d UL-W 1 11 1 1 F M 11 .... 1.1 11 P~+EL 56 Al 1111 iÂ¢11:i,~I'l~hill:LiÂ· 1/1,11~:I.l !23 1 9 ELEV. 100Â·-O- 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION - ADDITION ' ' E.1-SCALE-iM--14' ~ 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 , TA CaÂ»e LOWER LEVEL ~~ 7 ELE.. I.Â·11. E CO I 0 61 ff f 1 1 I T.. KAL-AL SKYLIGHT ] 7 ELIEV. 11Â©*i A T/. RIDGE KAM L.1.LUU-LLL-1-111-11_1LLI-lL-111UL_[111-IL....2~ 11-n-11 I-Illi~---I--ImÂ«ini I & To PLATE PORCH CUTBACK ~~F~-FC..9 1 lilli 11 M Il 'I M il H I 1-n--nUT-1--ITT111-TT'71~11~11~fl~fr~ffi~ril~~i~i~fi~~M~~iÂ¥ 1 -T r ELEV. 110Â·-1- 6~PPROXJ 7 ELEV. 115'-5 1/2- 1114 1=pl ~~i~*ICEE]IIU2]tE]COLE]CEIDEflÂ»~2Â«-AY*1 1,11.1 1=11:~ 114.111 111 1 lili 1 li ll i li li 11 li li 11 lilli HITIIHIIHHIINHI 11111'i|T|ill Lilli I 1 Epill[1%1 WAr[PffÂ»7(POFf([friTFU}f-f-rprrffhnmÂ»ffOYAÂ«fiY-1 ' W'lili !:'lili Iii Cli9O,1 + K,11.-NIL 5KLI/tr 5,5,EM TO. PLATE MAIN IABLE â€¢ 11 1 Il 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 ELEV. 109Â·-3 -- -lili - - -11 * T.O. ~Â»LATE aRIOSE H,614 113 9 m 1 ri G 0 lilli 5 1111~ 11111- ill' ~ 111~ 1 ~~ 11111111111111111 0 ELEV. 108-8 3/4* â€¢-91!,4 L.=211 / 1 Â£ 0 9 1 / L_3.11 E 1 / 5 % M 2 V.IF / ' a.141IUM(t) \ ..'.I' \ f,hak 11\ Ima 11 1 - 7/M/IKKEWBROSE 41 ,(101*R 1~1 1 ELEV. 100'-0Â· r ,----~- -----T- t----------t-F-------------- --- J 3 1,1===111 1 6,11111/ 1110'.111 lili I 5434 ji 411Â»69*111 1111,9.c,ZIP 1 1 1 L suku# ~------------------.AT~. CONC~. LteHTÂ·rELL BASE Cons#uclion iuue date 1 AD~TION ELEVATIONS I m..EV. 91'-40â€¢ D-i noe _-_91.----- ~-----------------1 - ------ 1 70. CONO. Loilâ„¢ LEVEL AL ST E -----I--- --1- 7 ELEV. 69'-'|' Sheet' c23 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 Mly SCALE : 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· ADD eouepisabl seeH Xpnr puEI JseM - uedsv Jo 40 ... 'iff f t | PROPOSE TO REI-OVE EXISTINS FLIE a 1 4--- r -M+-- design collaborative,lic. PROPOSE TO AD[) SKÂ·rl-16HT TO ROOF y PROPOSE TO REPL//t EXISTINS ROOF A T.CO. KAL-MAL_ SKÂ·rl-16HT : J TO. RDIE BEAM j ;j PROPOSE TO IrÂ·PRe/E EXISTINS FASCIA - - - I.V0< I./.* 320 oak lane A T.~. PLATE POR/44 (U/BA// aspen colorado 81611 phone (970).309. 0695 F~ROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTÂ»16 71[JOr{ fax (970) .920.7822 LOCATION AND SIZINe,ITH leGRADED ./.11 1 - IMO :212 ,111 CLAD OR MOOD MNE,OVe BY HN.*~,CniZER der*k@Itudleb~rchitect, net 9 TO BEE DETERM~ED *LION PATTERN TO PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINe STAIRS COLLABORATIVE LLC MATCH EXIST!,6 COIpirlote O 2003 ONEFRIDAY DENG I T.O. PLATE MAIN 6,eLE Film ,Â·â‚¬,RE APPROPRIATE HISTORIC SOLUTION THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN,ITENT 1292+Fli 1 if/1, .. 1 T.O. PLATE PINING BUMP-CIT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1. ILZf-NJ COLLABORATTVE LLC. NO PART OF COLLABORATTVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPiED MTHOUT â„¢E PRIOR WRITTEN <33 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALLAM ST. FACADE PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN DESIGN COLLABORATTVE LLC. SHALL \23/ SCALE : 1/4' = 110* RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AMID ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, COPYâ„¢GMT 2003 4 T.O. PDO. MAIN LEVELP e ri--------21=-------------4-1 1 I - PROPOSE TO REMNE EXISTING FUE 11 11 11 U , ritTT-T~TTT13-T-EFf-Tl-11-T-1-1~ PROPOSE TOIfâ€¢PROL EXISTÂ»16 F.eCIA 11 PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTI)16 /INDOF, CDC LOGATION AND SIZIN, PÂ«TH UPGRADED ' Mt=Ill*jm~Ilk==z=z==4*=mlf,*f-ll=====I=#1 A T.O. GOKES.. L////R LEVEL CLAD OR WOOD MID//6 HY HANFACTUIER o *..0 LU 24-zz--z-zzz-zzz----- ---_-~ ---~-- Ht-IiiÂ·ar. .1Â· 11--~=p-i=JIL==1[~-------Mi TO BEE DETERMIED FU.LION PATTERN TO - 8 -95 HATCH EXISTINS C.00Â«PITICÂ»e PROPOSE To REFIXâ€¢91 PAM-ABOOE STAÂ»t /1 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION Q: El SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-e ~02 5 m m a (43 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE 2r2 E.2-SacE:114==-14' >,2 t: . D ,-h ,-Â© Ch , , -0 -g M R ti 4 4 9/ 4 4 0 t ---- ma I Ii,TH lil' ON,ER}OR /1,-ENS,CON AT Lovt SIDE) /Il- â€ž===4== 1%%> COIIâ‚¬CTION ELEIEW. COÂ»ECTOR PIECE TO nE Â«fr--- 4 TO. KAL-/NAL SKYL//1/r - el/....+I'/"u* | ---- | TO BUI!-0* CODE 1â‚¬16111- MNIFUÂ·S I FOR LE~ST 1 INTO EXISTINe PAN-ADOOE ROOF COOITION CUE A /O RIDGE DEAM F~ Aâ€¢UNT OFINVOTTOPeOINS ke WILCUP Â¥ ELEV. 118=1' (APPMROXJ CONPITIONS TO EXUSTÂ»46 STRUCTURE IF LOFERED REEMOVE EXIST,)46 ELECTRICAL BOXES 4 PETERS TO MORE Menâ‚¬TICALLÂ·f DEEIR/!31_E LOCATION 10 2* EEIC "' ~~"IllECEMÂ·IUL==111~ r--=rrplir - -%./.. STYLE OF /NDOW TO REMAIN CONSISTENT HTH ALL 0.~ 1 r-kal=FTI--I Â· - | i /38[ZE]ZE],il====Ime~-Illitt~~ 1%0~15 TO BE REPLACED 1 Ati!1--- 11 1 T/. PLATE MAIN BIBLE i TO. PLATE PINING BUMP-OUr 0 - Â¢ILXEV.la6-3~ A TO. M.ATE BRIDGE HIGH 5aerer.r Â·105 1 A /0. PLATE E.....LOM (51 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACADE SOTEM 413/ SCALE: 1/4'= 1'-0- ir rT-1 1,11 GIF tEm*5 A TO. FUO. MAIN LEVEL,/ BRIDGE PROPOSE TO AD[) 91<*LIGHT TO ROOF I ELEVÂ· 100'-0. r--------------- --------~7 f PROPOSE TO REHNE EXISTINS FLLE 11 11 11 PROPOSE TO REFUâ‚¬E EXISTIMB ROOF 1 11 11 1 ----9-9-I Ati U ~I r--7-~ Cons/11*ion 11 Ir===ZE~ f-Tr----------~~~liE~=il r-----11, 1--2=:ircEJEE==I=UC~ PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXIST]NS -00â€¢4 issue date: 1 TO. CO~*S. .L BASE 111 - I t=ttz=~-~~~~~-#1 LOCATION AND SIZIN&-QED 1#~1 137â€¢Â·71-~ 61Â·AD OR WOOP INDOâ€¢16 BY MAUâ€¢,611*ZER AE!311 ELEVATIONS i TO. CONS. LOPeK LEVEL F[/1.--It---11-1 TO DE DETERMIED r ELEVÂ· 84'-4' H UMS T ___~RE=WasH PAN-m STAnt Sheet #: (23 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION ME./ SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0- A-3.2 (63 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE ADD SCALE : 1/4Â· = 1'-0- . I . C d ' 2 ,7 .7.7 a 4 4 L, 4[/ f 4.2723FIirative, Inc. 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 phone (970) .309.0695 I TO. KAL-MAL_ SKILISHT fax (97m.920. 7822 7 ELEV. 119 -6' (APPROXJ al; IM e.mall 0 7/. RHPIE BEAM derek@'tudlobarchlt*cts.n- i iIIXIIXIIII! 9 ELEV. 112-4Â· (-PROX) Â© 2003 ONEFRIDAYDESION COUABORATIVE LL C. THEINFORMAION AND DESIGN NTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THEE NOTEL ALL DIMENSIONS 4 HEIGHTS FOR , 1 PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY OESIGN PAN-ABOOE SECTIONS TO /13 Va91/1// THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR IN FIELD SIr CONrRAGTOR 1 2 COLLABORATIVE LLC. NO PARI OF COPIED Wn-HOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 06 TD. PLATE MAIN 6ABLE PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COUABORATIVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY Â· I ?!Amk~INING Bu-Ir DESIGN COUABORATIVE LLC. SHALL- 9 ELEV 1081-3 . 1.0 PLATE aRID6E H16+4 I \ L IV Ke ARE 4 r KITCHEN EL 1-1; IE~ 1 \ / 4 L.21 1 \ 1\ eATHERING AREA - BRIDE:g :-r-1 ' ""1 \ RErAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY *- ELEV. 108'-8 8/4Â· COPYRIGHT- 2003 ANC) ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 1 1Â» 1 --\ \ - FEr L: . VANITY --- ' Q STAIR e.â€¢â„¢ - : f /\1 -' 2 1 [jil \ - -/ 3 -- \ , [El - / B L==1 1. ./.=i / 1 U.UL-0 2 . \ -- - / / 11/ / / 1 1 {1 'j l- < I III III Ii-1 I I I I ?[I J '"" '" "" 0," 9 I I I=I -i I I I i I I, II I I I I I I ~1211=j I I I ~11 . A, 10 PL.,0 MAIN LEVEL - 1 ELEV. 100'-0' 66 1< 11 \\ e 3% 1 ri lili 11 \ 1/ 11 1 \ BEDROOM DEN lilli / 0 1 \11 1 / 2 raan 1.PLI// CO 11 1 /1 3 LONG AXIS SECTION: AA (ENTIRE PROJECT) 11 1 E SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0Â· _ 4 TO. CONG. LOVER LEVEL Â£ P ELEV. aq'-4 co I R CO f 219 J T.O. KAL_-eâ€¢IAL Sled-165HT 'f ELEV. 119'-6' 6â€¢PFROXJ 1 1 9 7 /7 6 7/. Rmet BEAM Â¥ El.EV. 112Â·-qÂ· 6-PROXJ 9 2 i ' ~ 'ocd* 1 NOTTZ ALL 01/ENSIONS 4 +â‚¬16+ITS FOR 1/0 - I PAN-ABODE SECTIONS To BEE VERIFIED NOTE ILL DIMENSIONS 4 +EIGHTS FOR 1 N nELD err CONâ„¢Al... | PAN-AEODE SECT-loNS g LIK BEâ„¢EEN HE/1 CONSTRUCTION 4 EXISTINe CONDITIONS m-- ~~~~ -- < ~~~~M~lell TO BE VER]RED IN FIELD Br CONâ„¢AOTOR 2 N.59 - 1 11 4 7 ' KITCHEN MiD I Â«77 9 BEV. 10,Â·-8 3/4Â· (V.ly.J ~ 1 6 T.O. PLATE BRIDGE HIGH Y ELEV. 108.3. - ---7. w PLATE PAN ABOCt y EJEW. taÂ·lÂ·-2Â· N.IFJ . ,6 T.O. F'LATE Hil/66 LaN ' - - 0 3-4 T.7 1 - Â» 1 ELEV. 108'-0- W.I.FJ [III] [IKJ / - 1 2 'BE go Â» CLOSET SATHERING AREA ~/ '1 : ga~ < ~> ' ~ ; b Hmn x Al \ 4 T/. PLPO. MALN LEVEL/ BA/DeSE / ~ TO. FL-,O.W - A I/. PLIO. MAIN LEVa-/ BRIDGE 1 - 1- ..... O... - 1 ELEV. 100'ir N.Ir) - 1\ /1 7 ELEV. 100Â·4â€¢ 1 I: 11 3 11 5.. 11 I ci L '' .STAR- I I ~.~ NOTE: FaROATION 1 Cli/29. SPACE EXISTING OIl i I MA/CE FOXÂ»CATION , FLOOR FOR 3 RADIANT FLOORPACK TO ENE OETERMI'/ED UPON /1.CUSSION W EN.1,â‚¬ER 1 1 I Rev. 1 1 - BEDROOM CLOSET Cons'uction ~ L___ ==zzizz _ 4 T.O. CONS. / Lt BASE 1-ed,te: F ELEV. 41'-ID' ~1NG SECTIONS 01. T.O. C.ONIC. LOPER LEVEL 320 HALLAM STREET L 7 ELEv. 84 -1~ (23 CROSS SECTION: BB (PAN ABODE) (33CF:loss SECTION: CC (BRIDGE) (4>CROSs SECTION: DD (ADDITION) A-4.1 ~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ~.~.~00/ SCALE: 1/4Â·= 1'-0Â· ~A4.1,/ SCALE: 1/40 = 1â€¢-0Â· '-I'll. eouep!Sehl seeH Xpnr City of Aspen - West End ... r i d a SPECIAL CASE CUSTOM WINDOFe - SGAWE 1/4~ c I'-0- JJOY HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 VEST HALL-AM STREET MINDOM SCHEDULE y SYMBOL ROUGH OPENING EAD HEIeHT F=RO DETAILS TÂ·rFIE MANUFACTURER MODEL NOTES T.O. PLyâ‚¬'.PER design collaborative,llc. IN X H SITUATED FLOOR JAMB GILL HEAD NUMBER 0 0 1 1 2.-61. A-1 2'-115/4-x 5'-5 3/4" 80-0- FROM TO. F . LO RL CLAD UNIT - GASEMENT PELLA 3565 - GASEM aspen colorado 81611 10 -46. 320 oak lane phone (970) . 309.0695 4~ 45 A-2 2'-11 3/4"x 5'-5 3/4" 8Â·-0- FROM T.O. F . LO R L CLAD UNIT - CASEMENT PELLA 3565 - GASEM fax (970).920.7822 8 2'-5 3/4- x 2Â·-5 3/4 8'-3' FROM T.O. PNP. MIN .LVL. CLAD UNIT - FIXED FELLA 2929- FIXED .-mill 102' 11 derekentudiobarchltects.n.t i ..7 - 0 4'-2 3/4" x 4'-2 3/4" 3'-3- FROM T.O. File. MIN . LVL. CLAO MA.LED UNIT - (2) FIXED/ (2) ~â€¢NINS PELLA (4)-2523 (2) 2525 FIXED 4 (2) 2525 AMNINe: SEE ELEVS r 11 01 1 2 all__I 1, i = da-14=Il lE 0 2'--6 3/4- x q'-0~ 9'-3" FROM T.O. P . M IN A .LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO DRAMING: A-10.1 EFCO CUSTOM-MULLED AIO.1 - EFOO 403 SERIES - ANODIZED ALUM. FIN 1 :T--[Irril 1Â§ 1 -*r-Tlml E IO'-4 IN' x 4'-O 4'-3- FROM TO. 010. M IN . LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO DRAWING: A-10.1 EFCO CUSTOM-MULLED AIO.1 - EFCO 403 SERIES - AtiODIZED ALUM. FIN COLIABOWIVE L.L.C. O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN A LIli/ \111 F TRIANSLE: AID.1 BOTTOM OF FRA Ne RI E ISTS. CLAP UNIT - FIXED PROFILLIT CUSTOM-CHANNE REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.IFJ â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN NTENT â€¢1 -* r 11~-77~11. vI * r Ilrrtil\ FIREPLACE /11 11 6 2'-41/4' x 3'-0Â· 3'-q" FROM T.O. FO. M IN .LVL. CLAD UNIT - FIXED PELLA CUSTOM 6LAZING TO BE COMPATABLE W 6AS APPLIANG PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF I +9=[Mlit I INMI 0:4 IHI H 6'-0' x 6'-1' -1'-3" FROM TO. FO. S IDGE VL KAL-FVAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-RAL CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KAL-PYAL LAYOUT THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR COPIED WrTHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 It'-1. X 8'-O. 8'-3' PROM TO. P MO. MIN .LVI. CAL-SAL PANELINe SYSTEM KAL-FYAL CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KAL-,NAL LAYOUT PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATME LL.C. ONE FRIDAY J IT-0Â· >< 1Â·-O- q'-3' FROM T.O. Fe. MIN . 1-VL. KALAL PANELING SYSTEM ICAL-FNAL CUSTOM REFER TO Alo.1 FOR KAL-INAL LAYOUT RErAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY DESIGN COLLABORATME LLC. SHALL AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, K 2'-5 3/4 x 12'-1 3/4 15'-3- FROM T.O. Pâ‚¬). MIN 2. LVL. GLAD M.ILLED UNIT - 64) FIXED/ (1) A ING PEL1-A (3)-2121 (4) 2424 FIXED E (1) 2,129 A,NNING: SEE ELEVS COPYRIGHT 2003 ASSEMEL.Â·f-GUSTOM ROUGH OMENINSS TO BE V IF L 6'-3 3/4' x 2'-13/4Â· ID'-3- FROM T.O. IN A D. LVL. OLAD MULLED UNIT - 8) FIXED PELLA (3)-2525 (3) 2525 FIXED: SEE ELEVATIONS M 4'-0. x 14'-O. SKYLIGHT LOGA AS I ICA D ON LAN KAL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-RAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS Â£ ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT V..F W,11'-1. f-f PAN-A 7'-10" x 4'-10' (V.I.F.) 6'-10' FROM T.O. F. PAN E PIOOP PULLED UNIT - FIXED,/ Ay*11 PELLA CUSTOM- MOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.LF) PAN-8 5'-3" x 4'-10"(V.I.F) e'-IO' FROM T.O. F. PAN E WOOD MULLED UNIT - FIXED/ *NI PELLA CUSTOM- WOOP REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.IF.) 2 1 I[---1-1-1-1-1-1---11 . AN-0 4'-2" x 2%-10" (V.I.FU 6'-IO~ FROM T.O. F. PAN E YVIOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) GASEMENT Pm.LA CUSTOM- WOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.FJ PAN# 5'-10 3/4' x 5'-6 7/8" 6'-10- FROM T.O F. PAN E MOOD M.ILLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA (2)-3563 (2) 3563 MJLLED PNOOD CASEMENT - SEE ELEVS PAN-E 2'-2" x 2'-2" 6/.1.F) 6'-10" FROM T.O. F. PAN E WOOD CUSTOM INIT - AMNING PELLA CUSTOM - VOOD REFER TO AID.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F,) 1 1211 PAN-F 4Â·-q" x 2'-10" (V.I.F) 6'-10' FROM T.O. F. PAN E PIOOD PULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA CUSTOM - WOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-e 5'-6. x 2'-6. SKVLIGHT LOCA AS I IGA ON N KAL-MAL PANELINe SYSTEM CAL-hAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS * ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT V.,F, 4~ 11Â· w. I f 23 E r==7==7===F==1577===r==T==11 KAI-*NAL TRANS-LICENT PABELING S/STEM E I R LdiLL 10Â¥ HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 FEST HAI-LAM STREET POOR SCHEDULE 1 /2. ./. 1 THICKNESS LEAF DIMENSION MANUFACTURER HANDING MODEL SEL ROUGH OPENING HEAP NOTES IN X H HEIGHT ARDINARE MATERIAL STYLE M X H INJMBER 7'-10- R.0. 5Â·-3..0 Ea Ea Ea Ea EG 002/A 3'-5" X -7'--r 1'-I. PASSASE LUMICITE CUSTOM TB.P. 3'-4Â· X 1'-0 TS.D. RH CUSTOM: LUMICITE INTERIOR PIVOT POINT DOOR 6 2 - 002/E3 2'-IO X 7'-I -1.-1. PASSASE MAPLE SOLID 13/4 2'-5" X 7-0- TB.D. LH i 003/A 2'-10 X 7-1 1-1- PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4 2'-8- X 1 -O- TeD. LH 0038 22'-6- X 1 1 PASSASE SLAZING EUROÂ·-e TB.P. 2'-5- X 1'-0- TB.O. RH CUSTOM EURO GLASS SHOMER DOOR 005/A 3'-2" X -7-1- 1'.1. SECURITY MAPLE SOLID ISA' 3.0. X -'-O. T.B.D. RH CHECK FOR FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS . IEG Eal , ma, ma 1 102/A 2'-10" X 7'-3' 1'-3- PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 13/4. 2'-8- X -1'-O- T.B.D. LH 2.-2. //0. 101/A 3'-0 3/4" X 1'-I" 1'-IÂ· PASSASE GLAD FRENCH I 1/8' 3'-O X 6'-to" PELLA RH 3682 PELLA GLAD FRENCH DOOR WITH 6LAZINe 4'-q' R.0 102/8 2'-ID" X -1'-3' 1'-3. FASSASE MAPLE SOLID 13/4. 2'-5- X -1Â·-O T.B.D. SLIDI INTERIOR SLIDINe TRACK DOOR 0-11/%11 1-IL==31 LEÂ»m los/A 2'-B" X 1'-3- -1'-8. PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4. 2'-6 X -1'-0" T.B.O. SLIPI POCKET INTERIOR SLIDINe POCKET DOOR 104/A 2'-10- X 70-1" 7-1. PASSAeE 6LAZINS EURO-GL TB.D. 2'-4" X 1'-O T.5.0. RH CUSTOM: EURO GLASS SHOMER POOR IOWA 2'43" X 1'-3" -1'-3" PRIVACY' MAPLE SOLID 13/4- 2'-6Â« X 1'-CD- T.B.D. SLIPIN INTERIOR SLIDINe TRACK DOOR 103/A qÂ·-oÂ· x i'-3Â· 10-3" SECUIKITY MAPLE FRENCH TB.D. (3) 9-0Â· X 7'-0Â· GUANIUM FOLDI TRACK QUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDINS TRACK NOTE: ALL EXISTING PAN-ABODE MINDOPS (3) 3'-0- x 5Â·-CDÂ· QUANTUM TO BE REPLACED BÂ¥ SIZE AND MULLION 110/A 4'-OÂ· x 8'-23Â· SECURITY MAPLE FRENCH TB.D. FOLDI TRACK QUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDING TRACK LAYOUT AS INDICATED. ALL ROU6H OPENINGS 113/A 3'-0 3/4Â· X BÂ·-3- 6'-3- SECURITY CLAD FRENCH I 1/6. 3'-O' X 8'-O' PELLA LH 3646 EXTERIOR CLAP FRENCH POOR WITH GLAZING TO DE VERIFIED BÂ¥ CONTRACTOR 4 MINDOR 113/3 6'-0- X 7'-3' 1'-3. PASSAGE MAPLE SOLID 13/4" (2) 3'-Cy X 1'-0- T.B.D. POUS SLIPINe INTERIOR DOUBLE SLIDINS TRACK POOR MANUFACTURER IN FIELD 1....1 1 Cons~ucion lasue date.- WINDOW & DOOR /1 h SPECIAL CONDITION WINDOWS Â£21-QQQB=&*INDOWSCHEDULES: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET SCHEDULE ~10.1/ SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' ~10.~ SCALE: NO REPRESENTATIVE SCALE Sh-* -10.1 il Judy Haas Residence puE' iseM - uedsv Jo 40 4'-10' 1/. L f . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning DirectohAA FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 320 W. Hallam Street- Major Development Review (Conceptual) and Variances- Public Hearing Continued from April 23,2003 DATE: May 28,2003 SUMMARY: The subject property is a 3,000 square foot parcel that was created as the result of a recently approved historic landmark lot split. It contains a Pan Abode home built in 1966. The application proposes an 826 square foot addition to the rear of the 600 square foot Pan Abode home. Conceptual approval, a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin are requested, along with a waiver of the one required on-site parking space. At the April 23rd meeting, the applicant was asked to provide some restudy of the plate height and ridge height of the addition to ensure compatibility with the historic resource. These dimensions have been reduced by 1 ' and 1'8" respectively. Staff finds that conceptual approval should be granted, along with the requested variances. APPLICANT: Judy Haas, owner, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001. ADDRESS: 320 W. Hallam, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). CURRENT LAND USE: Single-family residence. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the subTittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a 1 .. recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Recently, the HPC has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter historic structures. The following questions are likely to be ' the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How would the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the property? The property is significant as an example of housing built early in Aspen' s history as a ski town, at a time when economy and simplicity were desirable. Kit homes like this one were inexpensive and quick to build. Although the structures were machine produced, they still reflected the same American West iconography of the older true log structures in town. The Pan Abodes simulated traditional log construction and referenced its important details. Key features of Pan Abodes are that they are typically single story, with a low-pitched gable roof. They sometimes have deep eaves, and usually have exposed rafter tails. The flat surfuce of the machine shaped, tongue and groove logs are central to the building's character. Window openings are spare and usually horizontally proportioned, and wood trim is used to finish out the window openings. The building plans are simple rectangular forms, with smaller additive elements. Detail and decoration are minimal. This particular Pan Abode stands in a neighborhood where there is a reasonably strong Victorian context, including the two Victorian era homes to the west and one across the street. Historic cottonwoods sti~ line this side of the block. The small scale of this home, its materials, and low pitched roof form are anomalies on the block, however this modestly sized building is in no way 2 .. anticipates some debate over a skylight along the ridgeline, as well as an area of glazing that the architect has added to the front gable end ofthe addition since the last meeting. The only aspect of the height, scale, massing and proportions of this proposal which was in question at the last meeting was the roof proposed for the addition. The architect has dropped the plate height on the addition by l' and modified the roof pitch slightly to take 1 ' 8" off of the ridge. The steep gable roof pitch was selected to respond to the forms that are typical around this block. A list of the design guidelines relevant to Conceptual Review is attached as "Exhibit B." Having reviewed the model at the last meeting, and the drawings provided in the packets, staff finds that this project is in compliance with the HPC guidelines as well as the City's "Residential Design Standards." SETBACK VARIANCES The setback variances needed are a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin. The criteria, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code are as follows: HPC must make a finding that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Finding: The applicant is intruding only slightly into the east yard setback. A variance for the lightwell on the west side is only needed if it is larger than the minimum size required by the Building Code. Staff finds that the variance on the east for built in shelves is not unreasonable in size, provides some visual interest to the east wall, and creates a feature that distinguishes the character of the new architecture from the old. The lightwell is a necessary part of the basement expansion. The rear yard and combined front and rear yard setback variances are important in that they allow the addition to be set back as far as possible on the lot, creating a cushion of space around the historic house. Staff recommends the variances be approved. 4 .. intrusive. A small addition can be reasonably made to the structure without a negative impact on the character of the area. There are no apparent alterations to this Pan Abode from its appearance in 1966. An addition constructed behind it, and distanced from it with a connector should not negatively affect the Pan Abode's integrity score. Any architectural changes permitted to happen to the historic house itself will need to be carefully weighed to insure that integrity is not compromised. The project represents a build out of all but a small amount of square footage allotted to the site, so no significant projects would be anticipated to affect this site in the future. Design Guideline review The lot split approval for this property established some parameters that affect the current application. In recognition of HPC having granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus for the future redevelopment of this home and the adjacent Victorian, the Pan Abode became a designated historic structure and cannot be demolished. The maximum floor area for all construction on the Pan Abode lot was set at 1,500 square feet. A 2' west sideyard setback variance and a 2' combined sideyard setback variance were granted to accommodate the Pan Abode's existing location. The building is slightly crooked on the lot. Although the site plan included in the HPC's drawing set shows the Pan Abode square to the lot lines, the architect intends to maintain its skewed placement. A revised drawing will be required. The applicant may request approval to lift the building to install a new foundation in the exact same location, based on feedback from the selected contractor. I f this is the case, the request will be made at Final review. Planned alterations to this historic home are the replacement of the existing window units, in- kind replacement of the roof, and installation of a skylight on the western roo f slope. All three of these are issues that should be addressed at Final, not Conceptual review, however, staff s initial comments are that if window replacement is determined to be appropriate, the new units must carefully match the existing dimensions and muntin patterns. No alterations to these characteristics would be appropriate. Skylights have not been allowed on primary roof slopes of historic structures in the past, and the one that is proposed may be in conflict with the design guidelines. A one story addition with a more steeply pitched gable roof is planned for the rear of the Pan Abode, linked to it with an 11 foot long, one story connector. The connector meets the back of the cabin where a window is currently located, so no significant amount of wall surface will be removed as part of the new addition. The walls of the connector all held back from the corners of the existing building to maintain the integrity of it' s plan form. Staff finds that the location and nature of the connector piece meet the design guidelines. The addition is no wider than the Pan Abode, and is rectangular in shape. Any discussion of the proposed materials and detailing of the addition will be reserved for final review. Staff 3 .. ON-SITE PARKING VARIANCE The applicant requests a waiver of the one on-site parking space required of this project. Per Section 26.415.110.C, parking reductions are permitted for designated historic properties on sites unable to contain the number of on-site parking spaces required by the underlying zoning. Commercial designated historic properties may receive waivers of payment-in-lieu fees for parking reductions. 1. The parking reduction and waiver Of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district. Staff Finding: Only one on-site parking space is required by the Code for this one bedroom house. Providing it would eat up valuable space on the ground plane and could result in part of the addition being pushed up into a second story, which would not be desirable when the single story character of the Pan Abode is so key. Staff recommends the space be waived. The owner will be able to park on the street. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant conceptual approval and variances for 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, with the following conditions: l. HPC approves a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 2. An application for Final approval must be submitted within one year of Conceptual approvah 5 .. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2003." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2003 A. Staffmemo dated May 28,2003 B. Relevant Design Guidelines C. Application 6 .. "Exhibit B: Relevant Design Guidelines for 320 W. Hallam, Conceptual Review" New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. o Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. o The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. 7 .. o Setback an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. 3 Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. o Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 8 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 320 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO 16 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Conceptual) and Variances for the property located at 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, for approval of parking reductions, HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that: 1. The parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural chqracter of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district; and .. WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 28,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 28,2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval with the following conditions: l. HPC approves a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 2. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. 1 . UJuu#,wob / â‚¬#L-1~9*g L.u/lu \02/ 14Â£,04<Le-,1 4- fli,el APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 28th day of May, 2003. Approved as to Form: + . ~2141 6 2 (2) Ul Ul Â«0,1.0 / 4 62 4Â»'a-2 i 1- sl ' fs U vulâ‚¬*, . David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 40Â«; 041/-2 0-6- a l 91Â·Â·i 3 Approved as to content: FUn 64 0 A & v eat . HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ,~.-20 (4/, l-/ct / l n u,1 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Â«33/033-> , 200- /1. l STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, <7.-~ I .U 47 5% 1- 1 +ACC# (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: N V ,~<00.' Publication oj notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official v paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 6646 *1-La /ecy,E ~ignature -1,1. The foregoinÂ¥ "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged befor%me this)* day of Apri I , 2003, by .D Airâ€¢*t~ PUBUC NOTICE RE: 320 W HALLM-MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CON- CEPTUAL), VARIANCES. WAIVER OF REQUIRED PARKING NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL will be held on Wednesday, April 23,2003 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galina St., Aspen, to My commission expires: 11//~1.5, /2:2& consider an application submitted by Judy Haas requesting approval for Major Development (Conceptual), Variances, and Waiver of Required 4- Ap /23% Parking. The property is located at 320 W. Hal- lam, Lot K Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. An addition ts proposed to the existing Pan Nota+Public #23.*.Â·Â·~~" .. ~Â·....:40 Abode structure. The applicant Is requesting a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side 41-4' i O te yard; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the V. -1. 04?> t %1 west side yard; a rear yard setback variance of R rii Â· 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback j variance of 3.5'. The applicant is also requesting j 'i..... 0 a waiver of the one required parking space. ..0 ..... . For further information. contact Amy Guthrie at t 0........ ' the Aspen/ Pitkin County Community Develop- ment Department, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen. CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@c i.aspen.co.us. . WL OR AO s/Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ' ATTACHMENTS: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in The Aspen Times on April 5, 2003. (0253) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION . 5 -e -i ..L, . d ...6,â€¢.1-1â€¢Ill '~ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 320 W. Hallam Street- Major Development Review (Conceptual) and Variances- Public Hearing DATE: April 235 2003 SUMMARY: The subject property is a 3,000 square foot parcel created as the result of a recently approved historic landmark lot split. It contains a Pan Abode home built in 1966. The lot split approval established fome parameters that affect the current application. In recognition of HPC having granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus for the future redevelopment of this home and the adjacent Victorian, the Pan Abode became a designated historic structure and cannot be demolished. The maximum floor area for all construction on the Pan Abode lot was set at 1,500 square feet. A 2' west sideyard setback variance and a 2' combined sideyard setback variance were granted to accommodate the Pan Abode's existing location. The building is slightly crooked on the lot and a variance was needed at it's northwest corner. (Although the new site plan included in the drawing set shows the Pan Abode square to the lot lines, the architect intends to maintain its skewed placement. A revised plan will be provided at the HPC meeting. Staff believes this to be a non-issue that is not perceivable from the street.) Tile application proposes an 826 square foot addition to the rear of the 600 square foot Pan Abode home. Conceptual approval, a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell (note that this variance is unnecessary if the lightwell is the minimum size required by code, which the architect states will be the case); a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance o f 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin are requested, along with a waiver of the one required on-site parking space. Staff recommends that the plate height and ridge height of the addition be discussed at the HPC meeting before a determination is made to approve this project or continue for restudy. Staff finds that the variances, with the possible exception of the east side yard variance request, should be approved when the roof issue is resolved. APPLICANT: Judy Haas, owner, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001. 1 GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. April 8,2003 HPC, Katie Ertmer Page 4 the April 9 Memorandum does not appear to address this problem y/ith the front fagade at all. Issues with 'the front fa~ade should be rectified prior to any Cdnceptual Approval, / D. Design Guideline 11.9 Guideline 11.9: Use building components that are s~Ilar in size and shape to those of the historic property. â€¢ These include windows, doors and porches. Homeowners Response: The Honieowners agree with Staffs concerns, as set forth in the April 9 Memorandum, that "the shape and size of some o f the proposed vertical and horizontal windows are too narrow and are too different than those found on the historic building." The Homeowners believe that just as is the case with massing, scaling, and c elevation, all issues with respect to bufld* components that are not compatible with the historic structures should be resolved prior ~Conceptual Approval. It is the understanding of the Homeowners thht the very purpose of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines is to ensure that when â‚¬historic site is developed, that any new construction is compatible with and highlights the existiftg historic structures on the site. The New Proposal does not focus on the historic yellow home Rnd the historic shed, and make these structures prominent features of the development. Instead, ~pe two-story building is a massive structure that envelops the site and overpowers the historic bÂ®dings. The Homeowners ask Staff and HPC to require the Applicant to revisit the Design Gh~delines which have not been met Â· prior to any Conceptual Approval being granted. Thank you in advance for your attention to and consideratiorhof the concerns of the Homeowners. Individual Homeowners may submit letters addressing'i~~es in addition to the issues emphasized herein~ Very truly yours, GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. 13Â»/ ll,Ot#JKâ€¢ Natasha Saypol uu 84333-1 .. ADDRESS: 320 W. Hallam, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: R.-6 (Medium Density Residential). CURRENT LAND USE: Single-family residence. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) The procedure Â·for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal niaterials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with tile City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC iii regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition (s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Recently, the HI?C has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter historic structures. The following questions are likely to be the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How would the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the properly? The property is significant as an example of housing built early in Aspen's history as a ski town, at a time when economy and simplicity were desirable. Kit homes like this one were inexpensive and quick to build. Although the structures were machine produced, they still reflected the same American West iconography of the older true log structures in town. The Pan Abodes simulated traditional log construction and referenced its important details. 2 .. Key features of Pan Abodes are that they are typically single story. with a low-pitched gable roof. They sometimes have deep eaves, and usually have exposed rafter tails. The flat surface of the machine shaped, tongue and groove logs are central to the building's character. Window openings are spare and usually horizontally proportioned, and wood trim is used to finish out the window openings. The building plans are simple rectangular forms, with smaller additive elements. Detail and decoration are minimal. This particular Pan Abode stands in a neighborhood where there is a reasonably strong Victorian context, including the two Victorian era homes to the west and one across the street. Historic cottonwoods still line this side of the block. The small scale of this home, its materials. and low pitched roof form are anomalies on the block, however this modestly sized building is in no way intrusive. A small addition can be reasonably made to the structure without a negative impact on the character of the area. There are no apparent alterations to this Pan Abode from its appearance iii 1966. A-11 addition constructed behind it, and distanced from it with a connector should not negatively affect the Pan Abode' s integrity score. Any architectural changes permitted to happen to the historic house itself will need to be carefully weighed to insure that integrity is not compromised. The project represents a build out of all but a small amount of square footage allotted to the site, so no significant projects would be anticipated to affect this site in the future. Design Guideline review A list of the design guidelines relevant to Conceptual Review is attached as "Exhibit B." This memo will discuss only those which staff finds are not met by the proposal. Staff finds that the project is in compliance with the City's general "Residential Design Standards." The Pan Abode is proposed to remain in its current location. (The applicant may request approval to lift the building to install a new foundation in the exact same location, based on initial feedback from potential contractors. If this is the case, the request will be made at Final review.) Planned alterations to the historic home are the replacement of the existing window units, in-kind replacement of the roof, and installation of a skylight on the western roof slope. All three of these are issues that should be addressed at Final, not Conceptual review, however, staff s initial comments are that if window replacement is determined to be appropriate, the new units must carefully match the existing dimensions and muntin patterns. No alterations to these characteristics would be appropriate. Skylights have not been allowed on primary roof slopes of historic structures in the past, and the one that is proposed would likely be iii conflict with the design guidelines in this case. A one story addition with a more steeply pitched gable roof is proposed to the rear of the Pan Abode, linked to it with an 11 foot long, one story connector. The connector meets the back of the cabin where a window is currently located, so no significant amount of wall surface will be removed as part of the new addition. The walls of the connector all held back from the corners 3 of the existing building to maintain the integrity of it' s plan form. Staff finds that the location and nature o f the connector piece meet the design guidelines. The addition is no wider than the Pan Abode, and is rectangular in shape. Any discussion of the proposed materials and detailing of the addition will be reserved for final review. Staff anticipates some debate over the skylight's conformance with the design guidelines. The only aspect of the height, scale, massing and proportions of this proposal which staff feels is in question is the steeper roof pitch proposed for the addition. As staff understands it, the Pan Abode has a 2:12 roof. which is nearly flat, and the addition is proposed to have a 10:12 pitch. In speaking with the architect, staff has been informed that the roof pitch was selected to respond to the forms that are typical around this block. This may in fact be the best decision, however, both staff and the HPC will benefit from viewing the model o f the proj ect, which will be available at the meeting. This will help everyone to determine if perspective really minimizes the height difference between the two part of the building or not. As depicted in the elevations, staff has concerns with both the plate height and ridge height of the addition, per the following guidelines: 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. 1 An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1 -story connector is preferred. 3 The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. 3 The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. o Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. 3 Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. SETBACK VARIANCES The setback variances needed are a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition: a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side vard for a lightwell (note that this variance is unnecessary if the lightwell is the minimum size required by code, which the architect states will be the case); a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin. The criteria, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code are as follows: HPC must make a finding that the setback variance: 4 .. a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Finding: The applicant is intruding only slightly into the east yard setback. As noted above, the project appears to comply with the west yard setback requirement. Staff finds that the variance on the east for built in shelves is not unreasonable in size, provides some visual interest to the east wall, and creates a feature that distinguishes the character of the new architecture from the old. However, it is not necessarily directly related to the preservation of the Pan Abode, which the board should discuss. The rear yard and combined front and rear yard setback variance is important in that it allows the addition to be set back as far as possible on the lot, creating a cushion of space around the historic house. Staff recommends the variance be approved. ON-SITE PARKING VARIANCE The applicant requests a waiver of the one on-site parking space required of this project. Per Section 26.415.110.C, parking reductions are permitted for designated historic properties on sites unable to contain the number of on-site parking spaces required by the underlying zoning. Commercial designated historic properties may receive waivers of payment-in-lieu fees for parking reductions. 1. The parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district. Staff Finding: Only one on-site parking space is required by the Code for this one bedroom house. Providing it would eat up valuable space on the ground plane and could result in part of the addition being pushed up into a second story, which would not be desirable when the single story character of the Pan Abode is so key. Staff recommends the space be waived. The owner will be able to park on the street. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: 5 .. â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC carefully review the model provided at the hearing to make a determination as to the appropriateness of the proposed plate height and ridge height for the addition. If restudy is needed, the hearing should be continued to May 28, 2003 and a revised scheme(s) generated. With regard to the variances, staff recommends the HPC approve a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell if it is necessary and desirable for extra liglit and air to the basement, and approve a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin. The 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition should be discussed to ensure that granting it clearly forwards a historic preservation goal. Staff recommends that the waiver of one parking space be granted. An application for Final approval must be submitted within one year of Conceptual approval, which is standard procedure. A proposed resolution approving the project without restudy of the roof is attached in the event that the board is prepared to make such a motion. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2003." Exhibits: \0 Resolution # , Series of 2003 A. Staff memo dated April 23,2003 B. Relevant Design Guidelines C. Application 6 .. "Exhibit B: Relevant Design Guidelines for 320 W. Hallam, Conceptual Review" New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. u An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. o Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. u An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facAdes and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. u The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. cl Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. 7 o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. o Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. 1 Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 8 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 320 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Conceptual) and Variances for the property located at 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures:" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, for approval of parking reductions, HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that: 1. The parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 23,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on April 23,2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval with the following conditions: 1. A 3.6' side yard setback variance is approved for the west side yard for a lightwell if it is necessary and desirable for extra light and air to the basement, and a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' are approved to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin. 2. A 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition is approved. 3. A waiver of one parking space is approved. 4. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date o f approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension o f the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 23rd day of April, 2003. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Michael Hoffman, Vice-Chair .. ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk ~ Land Use Applicadon ~ THE Crn' oF ASPEN PROJECT: Name: JUDY A-\AA 4 \< 66\ F~ENCE Location: -320 WE~ST- HAUArn -STREE C L.0-0-T~ 9 - BLOCE UtE (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) <--35 - 12-9 - CGa- 21 APPLICANT: Name: JUDY .1-AAAÂ« Address: iPO Ec7>< 3-30 Phone #: 125 -68(12 Fax#: 12-4 -88 90 E-mail: d4Â¥ek@ tuofÂ»64<-chbledÂ£ rÂ»-r REPRESENTATIVE: Name: DEÂ«gic -*AU<Â© - EL FrielpAY , CLC, Address: -320 064 LAUE Phone #: -309 -069 9 Fax#: 6120 - -7322 E-mail: Â£:>fee-ek Qefuifio'2410-ch r'-frUS, ne31- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): E Historic Designation D Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) 1 Certificate ofNo Negative Effect j Demolition (total demolition) Certificate of Appropriateness 0 Historic Landmark Lot Split -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) E>< 19-1-7 1\/6 Â· - <54 /+LEI pÂ«nl LY .0651 [IÂ»JCE - RAN.1 -PeÂ£5DEL Â«-FÂ«Jan_.76222 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) UtE- - -5 1 A?GLE FAry, / LY FES 1 fIEU(IE_ 01*+4 ABACE 00( A.JEFU-/ ,NED)13--7 O7L FEES DUE: S RESf ABLE) unWÂ®00 .. Dimensional Requirement Form ~ (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: MAA,6 -Fal'**T- - -3, -320 UESU HALL.AMI .-~rrerEET- Applicant: U UPV 1.4,4Â«6 Project Location: -320 GUEST- A ALLA FO 21- Zone District: Lo-1-LS N '019> 5 LOCAL 01 2 Lot Size: -507-05 tg Ful- Lot Area: . 0609 ACQG>'6 (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: \4\ Proposed: 4# Number ofresidential units: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 0*iNGE FEAR 4 LY) Number ofbedrooms: Existing: \ Proposed: \ Proposed % of demolition: NA DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: 6% Allowable: Â£ 9& Proposed: \47-6 Height 01/) (24/3 Principal Bldg.: Existing: 4:073 Allowable: \ SOD Proposed: < 20 / '4~ Accessory Bldg.: Existing: NA Allowable: 1Â·16- Proposed: NA On-Site parking: Existing: O Required: \ Proposed: O % Site coverage: Existing: bÂ·+ Required: WA Proposed: WA % Open Space: Existing: MA- Required: NA Proposed: NA Front Setback: Existing: l H Required: [ 4 Proposed. I H C *MEI coaerlog ) Rear Setback: Existing: ~9 Required: 24 1C) Proposed: 1*TZ < uo spsÂ¥=dikc,2'YGas-r>j Combined 25, 4-51 Front/Rear: Existing: 20 Required: '-U-1 Proposed:4>j -(515*ne) Indicate N, S, E. W 461 91 Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: 3 2, 1.3 LIGE Â«relc 1 21 Side'Setback- Enstingr 9 Requiredf / Prdposed.* \'4A 4 5\CE se,*19<K Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: 851-uzuE 774E Â¥*u ;6Â¥30IE . r*f EE hâ‚¬k) 07#Ji=teyy?/ AJ G Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): l /4 " 4\\-DEL Â«ir-380<- v,62\AL) CEL ('' 5*:~=Nel#M~ eal~' L \614TWELL 97462 JA A-}622 (Ake62*30 1 â‚¬(CE-~ UJ c-ir rAâ‚¬â‚¬10-6 LAR 'ANCE - U.,41 ual 04'06[-EL, SFZ7T- - 1 5%â‚¬-AA os cD- 5 -4- ,52~~~~7~~_~L---2~~~~ jpL /3-b .. 320 Oak Lane Aspen, CO 81611 1 frid a y Phone: 970.544.0695 Fax: 970.920.7822 design collaborative Memo To: The Aspen Historic Preservation From: Judy Haas, Owner 320 W. Hallam St. Commission Derek Skalko, Principal 1 Friday Design Collaborative Fax: 970.544.9797 Date: March 26 2003 Phone: 970.544.9595 Pages: 2 Re: 320 West Hallam Street - Pan Abode CC: The applicant, Judy Haas, currently owns a 3,000 square foot property located at 320 West Hallam Street. A one story, historically designated pan-abode structure currently is located upon the site. We are submitting a formal application requesting approval of a significant addition to be added to the existing 20' x 30' pan abode structure with modest changes to the existing exterior as indicated in the design package. There also exists on the property a cottonwood tree of significant size. Aspen Parks Dept. has requested the new addition be as respectful as possible to the preservation of the existing cottonwood and we have proposed an addition connecting itself to the existing pan-abode in accordance with both Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and being mindful of the Parks Department's requests. As currently envisioned, the development would include preservation of the existing cottonwood tree, preservation and restoration to the existing pan-abode structure with no changes to the existing location and height of structure, and the development of a single story connection element with a story and a half addition structure with a footprint of roughly the same (slightly longer) nominal dimensions as the existing pan-abode structure. We will be seeking the following from HPC: 1) A 1 '-6" side yard setback variance on the north property side (as encouraged by the Parks Department) 2) A 3'-6" side yard setback variance on the south side of the property to accommodate a light well for the lower basement bedroom area 3) A variance to permit one fewer on-site parking spaces than would otherwise be required 4) Conceptual approval of the proposal as a whole 5) Approvals as requested to the existing pan-abode structure documented on architectural drawing sheet A3.2. 1 1 .. , We are very excited about the potential this project has offered us and look forward to working with your commission. Thank you very much, Derek Skalko Representative for Judy Haas, Owner 320 West Hallam Street .. PARCEL ID: |2735-124-00221 DATE RCVD: |03/25/03 #COPIES:~ :-- CASE Nd|HPCOO9-03 R CASE NAME:|Haas Residence Major Historic Conceptual Development PLNR:|Amy Guthrie/Katie E PROJ ADDR:~320 W Hallam , CASE TYP:~Major Historic Conceptual Dev STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Judj Haas ADR] PO Box 330 j C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81612 PHN:~970-925-6848 REP:~Dereak Skalko-1 Friday, LLC ADR:|320 Oak Lane ~ C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN1970-309-0695 FEES DUE:~ FEES RCVD:|$2520.00 ' STAT: ~-- REFERRALS~ REF:| BY| DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| , CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED:~ BY:~ DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: PLAT (BK, PG):| ADMIN: -----Mm.'-M .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and J upY 1.-0A..6 , cavE+2 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for F' 'sTZ,~~1<= FNE35fEEÂ»-Tle,J coUSiNAL BEVEU./ -320 ULSâ‚¬T 1-Â·/ALLA rn <9Ileâ‚¬ET- (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a detennination ofapplication completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovermg its full costs to process APPUCANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANT low -HAAS> By: By: Julie Ann Woods C6mmunity Development Director Date: 3 /29 /0-5 Mailing Address: liD Gox -3 30 ASFEK) i CIO 8 14 ) 2- g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 MAR-14-2003 FRI 12:08 PM FAX NO. P, 02/03 .. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Katie Erlmer DATE: 3.06.03 920-5711 katiee@ci.aspen.co.us PROJECT: 320 W. Hallam REPRESENTATIVE: Derek Skalko OWNER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Major Development DESCRIPTION: The lot was created 8 the result of a Historic Landrnark Lot Split and contains a Historically Designated Pan Abode structure. The Lot Split was approved by City Council in 2002. The Lot Split designated 1,500 square feet of FAR for this lot. As discussed at the pre-application conference, the project involves the construction of a new, modern addition at 1 he rear of the Pan Abode. It will bc a one and a half story addition, with a one-story connector piece. The applicant is asking to install a basement under the Pan Abode and raise the foundation by 12 10 18 inches. The applicant is also asking for setback varianccs and a waiver ofone to two parking sp accs. The application will bc subject to the Residential Design Standards as well as tlic Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The applicant is scheduled to appear for Conceptual before HPC 011 April 23. PROCESS: Step 1: Public hearing at 1-!PC for Conceptual Review Step 2: Public hearing at HPC for Final Review Land Use Code Section(s) Residential Design Standards 26.410 Major Development 26.415,070(D) Â£ Review by: StaiTand Historic Preservation Commission Public I Icaring: Yes, for Steps 1 ancl 2, the Applicant must post property and mail notice at least 15 days prior to hearing to land owners within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development at)plication. Applicant will need to proi,ide procd of Posting and nlailing with (m affid<ivit at the public hearing. Referral Agencies: none Total Fees: $2,520.00 deposit fee To apply, submit the following information: 1. Completed application form, including all application requirements as noted in the Matrix of The City of Aspents Historic Preservation T,and Use Application Requirements for Major Developmem 2. Proof of ownership wilh payment, 3. Signed fee agreement. 4. Total deposit for review of the application. 5. 12 _Copies of the complete application packet and maps. 6. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. The GTS department can provide this list on mailing labels for a small fee. 920.5453 7. Copies of prior approvals. 8. Applications shall be provided in paper format (iiuinber of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either ofthe following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable. MAR-14-2003 FRI 12:08 PM FAX NO. r. uj/uj .. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning. which is subject to change inlhe future, and upon factual represenlations that may ormay notbc accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. General Information ~ Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO 0 Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? 0 Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? 0 d Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? d In addition to City ofAspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Inten*or's Standardsfbr Rehabilitation or restoration o f a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? 0 W If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) A If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City ofAspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: 0 Rehabilitation Loan Fund 0 Conservation Easement Program QI Dimensional Variances D Increased Density 0 Historic Landmark Lot Split 0 Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 0 Conditional Uses 0 Exemption from Growth Management Quota System E Tax Credits