Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.HP.406 E Hopkins Ave.HPC 21-95
ISIS BLDG. HISTORIC DESIGNATION,~ CONCEPTUAL PLAN & PARTIAL DEMO ._ 406 E. Hopkins HPC21-95 ==\1 i 60* R P <95 H 1 'A Aspen/Pitkin Community ...~ Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 City Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63850-041 Deposit -63855-042 Flat Fee -63860-043 HPC 5-(00 .04 -63875-046 Zoning & Sign Permit - MR011 Use Tax County Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63800-033 Deposit -63805-034 Flat Fee -63820-037 Zoning -63825-038 Board of Adjustment Referral Fees: 00113-63810-035 County Engineer 00115-63340-163 City Engineer 00123-63340-190 Housing 00125-63340-205 Environmental Health 00113-63815-036 County Clerk Sales: 00113-63830-039 County Code -69000-145 Copy Fees Other Total €(06 -0-6 Name -331% c ec-, / 1 Aca Date:.73//Pr-Ghecle¥00(,2,7 Address: PrpJect#~0 619;1,~-~rf Obl: I I) aLr.+- Case N, , ., 2/-95- Phone: No. of Copies J~ 02= 0. ..1. PRCUECTION 6 @8 ROOM D A ROOM B A- 1 - L I. PACkECTION ROOM C PROJECTION 55&08 S F NET < f ROOM A Im - ap. NET 1 OPEN 1 7 E- :R i · 11 1 11 l i n -1=jiM * L 93 1111111 - 4 \» \\Xkuv 11 11 IRAMP UP (10% SNOW MELTED) UF H 1 TRASH /MErms 9 1 | TENANT STORAGE ' I 200 SF 11 402.29 S.F. - 11 .\ *- MECH. EQUIP. ~h A „ B /111 C r 462-8 S.F. NET E)aT CORRDOR m2 4- 2~57/Li u. 4 1 UP 9 - 3 t'Zi~4 Em Z b ZI U 0' THEATER 1 / 1. 1 44 t „ NET LEASABLE 6783.84 S.F 9 -- / . - -» 4 », -1 124 k i M I RFE HOUSE 1 TEN*IT SORAGE D »4 THEATER A THEA-ERS k - 0 Z 1,750 SA \ THEA-ER C THEA-ER D 250 SEATS +A 19(: SSTS 1+ 163 SEATS +A 100 SEATS +A 2,666 SQ. FT. 2 (22 30 7 1.726 39 :T (4 AANDCAPPED) \- t (4 HAND CAPPED) (4 knND-CAP'PED) Z T€ATER 0 NET LEASABLE 3731.65 S.F. 1 5 a / 16- / 1 .LAN. 41-1 R.1% z / 1-1 - P Pt » ' -,EFE »L*'~4 A F -=¢%- 1~11444 RAMP UP LOBBY IM -F 1 - LA] LY LXU' 2 21-- t= 4 STOR. VES[TEBULE 25 < VESTIBULE up r LE -1 11 [)14 rJAk | CON~SSION | .- 2< 1 1 1 :11,1.:.ill-~14911'llitjil' 1 12 =tuu LCIM -6 -1000000 4 -r i =11==zzi-EfEE#addtHRRM'MA#~1 I 1 y kl I 0000!1, £11 WOMEN 1-1 46) 65 ] MEN < 1 3 1 LOBBY V g AIRIA|Q|Q F 9~9~9~9|1~Q|9|9 r DISPLAY CASEE dii i'1' 'IL ' iIi• =:-C,--C-c=11 1 1 ; 1 - ~ DR~WING I FLOOR PLANS /7\ X Al 1~~ RESTORED H/STORC F€-2 , V U W % ¥ 1 Z ® LOWER LEVEL PLAN ~ GROUND LEVEL PLAN (3 ps NO. 9521 ~- DATE 7-26-95 '/6. - 1-0" , U THEATER NET LEASABLE 4287.71 S.F THEATER NET LEASABLE 7405.79 S.F. J SHEET NO. TENANT STORAGE 1917.73 S.F. WALLS /CIRC/MECH. 1798.62 SA & WALLS /CIRC.MECH. 2948.67 S F. 1 A2.1 U 0 2 6 16 E Z SHEET OF NORTH c>cop-2/La cue-£ -D·i•Ers Sl)31.I HONV 3 Ze >10018 A311V NOUVAONEIM SISI N3dSV #nN3A DIdOH 19¥3 90~ 0 . 0 0 1a 9 9 9 9 U h ST. 1 1 - 14 1 - I - . 1 ---=---------,0 1 MECH. Eoup U El 8.R . LR -----~f--1 1- 1-11-[ - m El-El m &1/ F LA. ON fit H-' | MECH. ROOF 10 0 A +1 121 ¥,Alls /CIRC MECH. < WALLS /CIRD MECH. h ¥ E -- m Erm m A H. UNIT A 105825 S.F. NET 1591.91 &F L ~ A H. UNIT C 105825 S.F.NET 842.45 S F. 4 i A 2 4 , K | BR- OPEN aR 56 = E . DA WALK WAY B.R. D.FL ¤ A 40 E 19 Pv-'U~ZI 1065.25 S.F. NET 11 _L~Af_~~ ~ -V V, r '1-7 DA - -44 1 A. H. UNIT B 1 A A H. UN[T D 105&25 S.F. NET Z i i DECK ~i -~1 D.R ..1 111 TY' 1 ~ DECK lilliT! D K----<VJ ?~ B.R. I~ - BA .1 'i I bi U f OPEN 0 -51 ROOF - LU N < LR. L.R. -1 1 --- W i1 I --------- -44 - 6 0--1 1» ~ »up -- OPEN =i~=== ' -- Fli B.FL &--1 A f== 8 $1 -- I /9 VU M.B. 1 . 11 $ DECK 1 Aolo 3 24% i mITIM ' 1 &111 1 L - 1 2012.75 S.F. NET ~- - I - Q- ' "'' Ezzli.ENf--~'-~ 1 BA ,~~ B.R. FREE MARKET UNIT 4 LIT ROOF 1 ROOF 4122641 UP I LR./D R rA , 3- 4,- DECK 1 It 1-1 ROOF 16 - =L 1 ~11 lim 11~ - 1 1'I m '11 /1\ /-A-1 n.\ - DRAMNG ~ SECOND LEVEL PLAN ® THIRD LEVEL PLAN I FLOOR PIANS 14 - 1-0 X A H. UNIT A 105825 S.F A H. UNIT C 105825 S.F. A H. UNI B 105525 S.F. A H. LINK D 106525 S.F. ~ p NO. 9521 FREE MARKET UNfT 2025.70 S.F. WALLS /CIRC./MECH. 830.69 S.F. g DATE 7-26-95 WALLS /CIRC./MECH. 1542.36 S.F. < U p J SHEET NO. - liki al. 0 2 6 16 ~ 4 42.2 Ch I SHEET OF NORTH t./0,011 0-z a»-E "O.93% 91331[HOMV NOLLVAON33 SISI Gluto€ 0 9£££-guto€ ;mi . SE, 018zg13019~311¥ 'N 9 'W'l '3nN3AV SNINdOH 15¥3 90, 1 0 1 1-2- i- I 1 iII- 1 -J 1 . 2 1 1--1 % 3 m ---~ i , 1 9 ---I- I----I 8= -11 U ' ifm 51 29 ~ 31 El r - r- - -3 . 1 LJ t . 1 H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1 2 5 22 V i Q CO LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 320 EAST }Al,AN AVE ' SUTTE 301 ' ASMN, CO 81611 0 TTLE; 303923-5390 ' FAX: 30192&-3076 el 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E COLORADO AVE. ' mLURIDE, CO m435 • TELE: 303*28-3738 • FAX; 30}71&-9367 MO-138 >1030 NV-Id BOOB UNE OF'WALL CA - -----------"---------------*------~~-------*-----*.-----*-'----------EFE.,-, ------------*----------------------~ - rl r.r~M.I - ~----------------------- --------------------------5f£16#:---------------- E-E*ef~~17f ?. -f 1~--- ~~ ----- - - ----------------*-p!!!E, I~wItt 111~]Hi-Puttflu-...... LIT.....&.~~~~~~~I;./././...</El:.,I/.../.#.6.2./...".&.m./.5.# ;,5/'J/ T,;.,/,I/'/j,;///;.<2*0*pjf#---I-5/3#31.1*.2,2ili./.I'e/-- 4?24- -A-----.. -- -'.....s:+..........8---siwim~w~F ]Ilm[ Illill iwi rete"ilinyfii.'ag'_,=; ,~_ril lill'll' 'illi~illi~~illiriijlltilr#-Il-1-I-lkli~lill-IILJLIWIJIkIiLI~~/,Trr :°939 - Efil./42.fififf.EN*/Mi .=4%*I ~liv.qr,7 t1 1:*assi - -0 3%~52==22:2~*Ukilimli*-2* - 0,0 - {%11.2.el=.INE•*•=3•1•-- - 1 -013- _ 34 //////1/ill"IMMI---48*222--m/-3 I'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll/- 8fflitly'limicfj'Millmilimmum//m ~*3%§24-e-ae.iv*§§<i~7~ ----- • - {***5~WffiWW-&32&2*2 -- ~ 11* m.* 11%*tilili lili:*1311% m.% 1. ~ - Ef®12 •••• 22 •• •• 52&1=g=2 - 45--- - Fay-~ te-fiti#/ti# - 1,1,3%1~. aa.0-i .%**MINI@lilll- - 4-1 2- 111 Killihillia.*=Ill'11&11•'11-1&=4 =011 2 _-®*32**= Ii-/1.'Al.413 U. 1 -*021=11*1--1*Jiwi 8=&=tRI Imlia----- a . e. . A.. .. 0. A. 0 . : 0.. ... . . . =ff ~.fl'.~:~'~'.....~..~.'1~.:....~lilig---I~~~I--------~I-------------~--~ :-I~.'~~R.~~~--I~ Z------ .---32~~=---I--~~-I-~=------=I:::: 2.-.-.4. -~.22%11*22=~-f-fi *-332..RIM/1-.----------maam--------------m-- .--= ==== *¥iliwilimiwilitia/:ras1.:=~--Il::I."r=..El:Alit--I.~mil:-23:/.--. Aff<#Mmiffi# =**52**g~i-x~-q~&**1Fj-2--*11.2---~-.---16 1:12&****I/"fi#/1/.5/gli 11/ir#<P<-r~idia#ga.-lim//35-9-/fi--.=.wilde:=------~----=--- =':/:'::'/£EEEE..1--------- --- ismmiSMFMMIT,El*2*laair-----9---1,/ar-=1---------imp---- e=*e,fEE*/lm//Ali~*fi------.9,01-:,-.11/:.TQ:.---:f...~~~~..................................~........................................................... Dz- =-c:J'Gal-,1~19|*1/MA%re --I----------==...i=...-Ill..=.......'„*,im~~ e . . ~ r . : . . . .. .... . -~ b/'/44,/A 111'1:1~111,11,111,111/ I/*/A/#/A/# ..111111111,1/ -1111111,111 --7 --lili , ill.,111111 ..11 11- 11'111,11'11,11,1,11'1,1,11'111 7 -11111111 1'1'1'1'1'1'1'I lili 1,1,1,1,1 11 - 11'11'11 1,1 1 -1111111, -lilli'.11,1 -J1I111% 1,11 li li 11 6% 1 1 - FOX PHOTO I ./ -•T-r'T-r-r·T-r-+T»T-r·T-r- BULENG Alil,1111,111.1,1,11,1111,111111:11.4.1.. 1~ i '0 1~ ~ ~1~ki'; 1 1 11,11'111'1111,11,11 El Zc 1 11'11 1,1 m 1 FIREE ST,noN , 9 X 1,1,1,1,111'il, 1,1,1 1,1, .1111,1,1,1,1 1,1,1 Iii ill'i 0 .4 3. 111 11 1 = 11111'111'14 11'111.111 11: lili,1 6 . . Rvmi|||| ~~||||||||ij|| i|i~ Ii|||||ii f *Nulnm~KI|||||||||~1|id|Hi||iii|~~|111- 8 E -- L-4 1 ~''' 59 EEB I EEB -- ------ 1 1 F=9 1 1===1 --- -- ----= 1 ~9 © NORTH ELEVATION N 0 2 6 16 Big CO 2 5 . =r-- 1|1 1 ; Iii 1 1.11 11:1,11'1 1 '111'J 11'111 1 , 2< 1 1,)111 1 111111,1111' 1.. E 1 ~| i,11!11 lilli! 1111,11:111111,11. i'F--ir--1 Ill 1111I1111I I 1 1,1~J,1~1, P FOX PHOTO ~ DRAWING X Z ~ )00 NO. 9521 A DATE 7-26-95 U , J SHEET Na. 3 A3.2 rh WEST ELEVATION CE I SHEET oF 0 2 6 16 'i.Orf~(26 0-8 Ck,-~ ANDIEBCES SlE)31!HDEIV 3=IdINNAD 53121VHZ) OllVAON33 SISI 0130181 . 11¥ OCI,15 oa¥30103 nN3A SNI>IdOH 19/3 90, 9 *1 5101 1 400 40* ' - 1 - ® i : 3~ ~2_21 3 4 i 8 + ~ -JJ,Ii E y7 9 0 N liB 1 1 33 -4 F-J W I 130 --'0 S m 4 4 9 0 --1% Z 1 1-= f I - ~fil t 91 \E r S Ul.UL__ __ 1 > 1mii M m 1 0 1 Ir--- / . 11 11 1---- al iM 1 -----1 ,Z j 8 [ 0[M -[· 4 11 (i -Em2111®1~1 1 ---31 - - - - I - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it i r---- B L 4 h i I em r - ----------------- 09 0 9 1 H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I 1 El m E /S/5 RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS i >53 %1 i e Et *0 4 R LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 320 EAST HYMAN AVE • SUrrE 301 • ASPEN, CO 81611 0 TIlt 303925-5590 ' FAX: 301925-5076 e. 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E COIORADO AVE.' mIURIDE, CO 81435 'TELE: 301726-3738 ' FAX: 303728-9567 NOI103S UNI(]1108 8 bal¥31··U 0 . 41214------ 0 Fum - 1451 ROOF O.Am, ~ / 0 1 1 - L~ EXHAUST Bl FIDE FLUE BWE n In 1 Icl] FIDE i L_i 4 W c -- 1 'ti -1 -0 9-1 zm 6- A- ./32 Nr cam NI, A 3 5 0 i2 iJ L-1 - r 0 m 3 013% C i 1 ./NI.-- L.---84 1.4 1 ] ;1 ;1 71 I : =ITE fl=1-1 b _ ;14 . 1 1 i i | i r--1 1 1 111 It 1 . 1 1 1 11 111 1 1 1 1 ---- 1 >f- L -M=~~ ~ . . . J 11 1.9 \ t / 1 / 1_/ G IN'/ H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I e I. m El /5/S RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS m .1 8 m 3,. lip -4 LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 320 EAST HYMAN AVE. • SUITE 301 • ASPEN, CO 81611 ' TELE: 301923-3390 • FAX: 301923-3076 em 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE • TELLURIDE, CO 81433 • TELE: 303,728-3738 • FAX: 301728-9567 NV1d 13A31 NV-Id 13A31 8 d NVId :1008 SNOLUONOO 9NLL9*3 SNOI.LIGNOO 9 1 91 f i 3:wwols . 1 1 5655=61 ia IL dauded".u,iN,iuididdi,~Wij:&:ULVul~:,wadd=wawrdwitil 8---0------------ ~FIR R 3 FIR R R AR r - - 11 l' 1, ~ '1 4|1~~ 1~~WM'i "L'' " ''i 11 1 lilli 1 ULLU.1, 6 2 R =~~~~~9rrTnTrrTrTTTmrrn %~ 1 1 R lilli lili U.1 1 1 ill , - 4 U /7 EAST ELEVATION rh SOUTH ELEVATION f 111 2 C.) vii. 1-0/ lt~ Z D ry 5 ¢ U . .4 . 18 1 i .. 1~ 1 Z ES 0 00 01 pr E B U al 1 U l L Z 0 U m 2 le ® NORTH ELEVATION rn WEST ELEVATION 1 5 12 4 Z Z 06 LU r Lj-] 170•2 i g PROUECTIO'N - ROOM 11 -00000 \\ r ~- rr-r I ®03-T~NG CONDrrIONS 5701*GE ~ DIMW1IL SUING AAEA X LU STAGE SEATNG AAEA M 7 1 ST De·GE STORAGEE 1-L Q. ~, m Z ---- ;- MTE 54-95 6 J SHEET NO. E2 ~ BUILDING SECTION IA" - r-001 1 ~ 5HEET OF INLE U/toE :xw . ocalwtor :1131 . GE,le 03 ga]Mn OCIVHC~gOD) N BAN3AY SNI)!do H 16¥3 904 :X¥:I. 06ff-,0*Of :3131. . 119[9 00 'NldS¥. 10£ - EXHIBIT J SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. lully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. APPLICANT: Isis LLC ADDRESS: Isis Theater Building (The H. Weber Building) 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 ZONE DISTRICT: Commercial Core (CCi 9,000 sq.ft. LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 8,044.76 sq.ft. EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: 18,000 sq.ft. PROPOSED FAR:- ·' , 17.830 sq.ft. 5,669.0 sq.ft. EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): 11,693.5 sq.ft. Approximately sixty nine percent (69%) EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: Approximately ninety five percent (95%) Approximately thirty one percent (31%) EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): .. PROPOSED% OFOPEN SPACE (Commer.): Approximately five percent (5%) EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Blda.: 28' - 3" / Accessorv Bldg: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Ptindoal Bldo,: 40 ' _ 0„ (dl dlley) / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: To Be Determined Two (2) EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: Three (3) (Not including Affordable Housing) Four (4) EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: See attached letter from Vann Associates SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: None Front: None Front: Nnnp Front: Rear: None Rear: Nonp Rear: ...N@,AFA--- Side: None Side: Nnnp Side: None Combined Front/Rear: Noen Combined FrVRr: Nonp Combined Front/Rear: Nonp EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ None ENCROACHMENTS: Eight (8) inches over the westerly border onto Int J VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Onlv: character comoatibility findina must be made bv HPC): NA NA FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: NA Parking Spaces: No on-site parking Rear: NA Open Space (Commercial): 379 sq.ft. Side: NA Height (Cottage Infill Only): NA Combined Frtlmr: NA Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): NA i IAND USE APPE[CmJION 10[24 ~ AImAC:HMENI, 1 EXHIBIT K 1) Project Name Isis Building Historic Preservation/Adaptive Reuse 2) Proj ect location 406 E. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, Colorado - Lots K, L and M, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pit County, Colorado. (indicate street address, lot & block ramber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning Commercial Core (CC) 4) Iot Size 9,000 sq.ft. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Isis Limited Liability Company c/o Houston and 0'Leary Inc., 305 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611-925-8664 6) Representative's Name, Address & phone # Charles Cunniffe Architects 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, CO 81611-925-5590 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA X conceph ia l Historic Dev. Special Review ' Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD - Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final FUD X Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisian X Historic Designation ~ Condaniniumization - 'rext/Map Annrxlment (NOS Allotinent Lot Split/Lot Line (N33 Eboemptian Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (Inmber and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; Immber of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). Two story brick/sandstone masonry and timber frame construction, containing; Movie Theater: 4,297.0 sq.ft. net leasable Plumbing Shop: 1,469.5 sq.ft. net leasable Dwelling Unit: 753.0 sq.ft. net leasable (2 bedroom) 9) Description of Development Application See attached letter 10) Have you attached the following? X Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Sulnissian Contents x Respanse to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents X Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Applicatian .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 7/27/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC21-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-30-006 PROJECT NAME: ISIS BUILDING HISTORIC DESIGNATION, CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW, PARTIAL DEMOLITION Project Address: 406 E HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN APPLICANT: DOMINIC & KATHRYN LINZA Applicant Address: P. O. BOX 180 ASPEN, CO 925-7909 REPRESENTATIVE: CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Representative Address/Phone: 520 E HYMAN, SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 925-5076 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: r· ·- -- C- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, The Isis, Landmark designation, Conceptual Review, and Partial Demolition- PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 9, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests landmark designation, conceptual review, and partial demolition approval for the Isis Theater. The Isis, formally known as the Webber Block, was built in 1892. It was originally used for commercial shops until approximately 1920, when it was converted to a theater by the Women's Civic Improvement League, for silent movies and minstrel shows. The existing alterations to the front facade are believed to have been made in the 1960's. HPC has reviewed the project in workshop format on July 12 and 26th, including a site visit to the property. APPLICANT: Isis LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Charles Cunniffe Architects. LOCATION: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lots K, L, and M, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen. LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark Designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearing), and first and second reading of a Landmark Designation Ordinance by City Council. City Council holds a public hearing at second reading. LOCAL DESIGNATION STANDARDS: Section 24-7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Code defines the five standards for local Landmark Designation, requiring that the resource under consideration meet at least two of the following standards Please note that the standards have been recently amended by Resolution #21, Series of 1995. A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or 1 .. political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado of the United States. Response: The building was built for Henry Webber, who was elected mayor of Aspen in 1888. Other buildings in town are associated with Webber, who also built the Elks Building and Pioneer Park. B. Architectural Importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type, (based on building form or use), or specimen. Response: The building is a traditional Italianate commercial building with a strong cornice line, brick corbeling, and brick and sandstone construction. Prior to alterations made in the 1960 's, there were storefronts at the first floor. C. Designer: The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: The architect's last name was Quayle, but no other information is available. D. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The surrounding neighborhood is a historic district and contains many significant historic structures and Aspen Landmarks. Two adjacent buildings, the Collins Block and the Brand Building are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. E. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: This building is the last 19th century commercial structure in downtown Aspen which has not been rehabilitated. Restoration of the original appearance of the structure would increase its contribution to the character of the commercial core and it's representation 2 .. of architecture from Aspen's mining era. Conceptual Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to section 5-510(B)(2). Response: The project involves constructing an addition on the vacant lot to the east of the existing structure, adding two levels of housing units on top of the existing structure, rehabilitation of the storefront on the existing structure, excavation Of a basement and construction of new theater space, and rehabilitation/demolition of portions of the existing structure. In general, Staff is in favor of the proposed design concept and the program for this project. While the building is not listed on the National Register, one of the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" is to maintain a structure in it'S historic use when possible. The on-site affordable housing component of the project is also in keeping with community needs. Several issues were brought up during HPC's preliminary discussions of the project, mostly dealing with the 3 .. location/design of the residential units. The HPC seemed to be in favor of eliminating the heavy chimney mass at the east of the free market unit, pulling the residential units in from the existing building walls, using a different material, masonry or other, for the new units, and not allowing planting materials or outdoor furniture to be placed at the edges of the roof. Staff recommends that story poles be required before conceptual approval is given. In relation to the new addition, HPC did not seem to be in favor of the arcade element and this has been eliminated from the design. Comments were also made in favor of retaining the metal siding currently on the alley and reusing it on that facade. The applicant was asked to provide more information about the original appearance of the storefronts. Some of this may be difficult to confirm without demolishing the board and batten area, however, the architect should avoid a conjectural solution. Staff is in support of all of these points, and agrees strongly that the residential units should be pulled away from the existing walls and built of some material other than brick to distinguish them completely from the existing building. In terms of the new addition, brick may be an appropriate material. Staff recommends that the architect study the horizontal alignment of building elements between the existing structure and addition to see if any greater correlation can be achieved. This is not to say that the addition should directly imitate the historic structure. Staff's greatest remaining concern with the proposal is the extent of demolition, which will be discussed later in the memo. The applicant wishes to take advantage of one of the incentives provided to landmark properties, which is waiver of required parking. Currently there are four parking spaces on the site, located on the vacant parcel. These will have to be eliminated with the construction of the new addition. Twelve more spaces are required by the new space. None of these can be provided on site. The applicant requests HPC approval for waiver of all of the required parking (16 spaces). HPC may do so and/or may require the applicant to pay the cash-in-lieu fee for a portion of the parking, which is $15,000 per space. Staff recommends HPC waive the parking and fee as the applicant must invest substantial money in the rehabilitation of the historic structure. 4 .. There is also an open space requirement in the Commercial Core zone district, which requires that 25% of the site be open to the sky. On this site, meeting the open space requirement would mean that the lot which is currently vacant would probably have to remain vacant. As the applicant describes in the attached letter, the general character of the commercial area is that of storefronts right at the sidewalk. Pocket parks are certainly valuable in a densely built area, but this particular block would benefit from the creation of a stronger facade line at the street. Staff supports waiver of all but approximately 450 sq.ft. of open space as requested by the applicant. Only the Planning and Zoning Commission can grant this waiver, but a recommendation from HPC would be appropriate. The existing "Isis" sign appears on fairly early photographs of the building. It is shown on the development plans submitted, and Staff feels that it should be a condition of approval that it remain on the structure. (The bathrooms in the new theater should also continue to have powdered soap.) 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The addition fills in a "gap" in the streetscape. From the pedestrian's view, the rooftop development will have little impact on the character of the neighborhood if it's visibility is reduced as described under standard #1. Because Aspen is viewed from above from the ski mountain, it is important to consider visual impacts from that perspective as well. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The new addition is set back from the front of the theater and the rooftop addition should be unobtrusive enough to allow the historic structure to remain the predominant element and therefore preserve its historic significance. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This standard will be met provided that 5 .. demolition issues are resolved. PARTIAL DEMOLITION 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: The applicant represents that the majority of the structure, except for the front facade must be demolished for two reasons (1) because the existing walls are not structurally able to support the rooftop addition and (2) in order to excavate the basement. Staff finds this to be a central issue in the project. In order to accommodate the theaters on the ground level, it is apparent that a portion of the east wall must be demolished. The rear wall of the building appears to be wood construction (not masonry) and is covered with corrugated metal. Staff is not overly concerned with reconstruction of this wall, but recommends that the metal siding be reused on the new wall. With this understanding, Staff finds that the remainder of the building should be retained, repaired and reinforced as needed. If necessary, a new bearing wall can be constructed immediately inside of existing walls as seems to be proposed for the front facade. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: Demolishing all but the front facade of the building does not meet this standard. It is not HPC's policy to historically landmark properties and then allow them to be nearly completely demolished. This approval would present a poor image to the community of what preservation is about. B. Impacts on the architectural character of integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. 6 .. Response: As discussed under the conceptual development review, the new construction is generally appropriate to the historic structure. Residential Design Checklist Ordinance #30 applies to all residential development in the City of Aspen, including mixed use projects. This project is in conflict with several elements of Ordinance #30, namely, building orientation (requires a street oriented entrance and principal window), building elements (requires a one story element at least 20% of the width of the facade), build to lines, and primary mass. The design of the affordable housing units has not been provided in great detail, however, it appears that these standards will not be met. Staff recommends that HPC waive these standards in the interest of making the residential development as imperceptible from the street as possible, and because the units do not have any direct relationship to the pedestrian streetscape. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC approve Landmark Designation of 406 E. Hopkins, Lots K,L, and M, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that standards A, B, D, and E are met. Staff recommends that the Conceptual review and Partial demolition reviews be tabled to August 23, 1995 with the following direction to the applicant: (1) Study the feasibility of retaining the majority of the 7 .. structure in place and repairing and reinforcing it. (2) Continue to investigate the original appearance of the first floor of the existing building. (3) Move the rooftop addition in from the existing building walls and study using a different material for this construction. (4) Place story poles on the roof of the existing building to show the location and height of the rooftop addition. (5) Eliminate the heavy chimney mass on the free market unit. (6) Study the relationship of the alignment of the fenestration on the addition to that on the existing building. 8 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 12, 1995 Roger: Could the house be set back three feet on the front? Glenn: It is trying to match up with the existing porch on the side and that would not be possible. 1 Don: Is the east end too much of a problem for a condition on the motion or should we table? Glenn: I could present some options. We just want something that will work for everyone and we can do that even with conceptual approval. AMENDED MOTION: Jake amended his motion to add condition #7 7. That a restudy of the east end addition occur at a worksession. second by Roger. All in favor of motion and amended motion. 406 E. HOPKINS - ISIS THEATRE - WORKSESSION John Wheeler, from Cunniffe & Assoc. presented: We are here to talk about the H. Weber Building 1892 circa approximately. It has been a theatre since the 20's when sound movies first started. The intent is to utilize it as a theatre and add more theatres. There is a vacant lot between the fire station which is intended to be expanded into the 9,000 sqft. parcel, all three city lots. The first level will maintain the existing facade and be restored back to its original condition. We are pulling the facade back and there was an assayer's office in the vacant lot that is presently there. Is it more important to have a street facade or an open space that steps back. Upper level will become two theatres and the lower level will be excavated with smaller theatres below. The project buildout will require additional space on top of the building. The upper levels will consist of employee housing that is required by the site. The house onsite has been moved as far back on the building to the alley facade and there is a lower mass with a open market housing unit and we have pulled that back to relieve the facade to preserve the integrity of the original facade. We are in study mode only. Fox photo is to the west. There is an elevator tower. One free market unit will replace the existing unit and there are four two bedroom employee units. Amy: They need to mitigate 60% for employee housing and they are showing 100%, so they are giving more. John Wheeler: The application is going to be an exemption from Growth Management for the expansion of an historic landmark which is approved by the P&Z. It requires the HPC to recommend and the I) 14 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 12, 1995 ., City Council to adopt historic landmark designation. It is on the inventory but not designated. The P&Z approves the exemption for the expansion. The criteria for the exemption is that the additional commercial square footage which is the additional f theaters in this case must have their affordable housing mitigated.' The expansion allows you to book first run releases on movies. They will be able to use a variety of benefits etc. The theatre can be used for other public events like an auditorium which has not been used in the past. Donnelley: Is there an operator yet? Sonny Van: Not yet. Donnelley: Then there is no guarantee that this will be used for community events. Roger: Is the front facade as close to the original as possible? John Wheeler: We have one photograph and he building was originally a wearhouse. In the 1904 map the building was separated into three partitions and the far east was a plumbing shop and remains that way today. On the alley it will be a rebuilt masonry facade. Roger: Why did you not draw any windows in the upper west elevation? John Wheeler: In this zone there is zero lot lines and the next parcel can build right up. The upper portion of the addition falls in to the Hotel Jerome view plane. We have to assume that both sides can be built to 40 feet at some point in the future. Sven: I am an advocate about things going out to the property line. John Wheeler: We have to maintain some open space. Sonny Van: You can waive the open space but we have to cash out. We thought it important to have the open space to separate the old building from the new addition. Sven: We have some problem with brick and the duplication of historic detailing that is put right up against old masonry. Jan Darrington, Cunniffe and Assoc.: We will be removing some old brick and will keep it to repair existing walls etc. Jake: Is there a basement? 15 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 12, 1995 Dan: No, there is not. MOTION: Jake moved to adjourn; second by Sven. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 16 EXHIBIT J SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear._fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17, OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. APPLICANT: Isis LLC ADDRESS: Isis Theater Building (The H. Weber Building) 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 ZONE DISTRICT: Commercial Core (CCi 9,000 sq.ft. LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 8,044.76 sq.ft. EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: 18,000 sq.ft. PROPOSED FARf ·' , 17,830 sq.ft. EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): 5,669.0 sq.ft. PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): 11,693.5 sq.ft. Approximately sixty nine percent (69%) EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: Approximately ninety five percent (95%) Approximately thirty one percent (31%) EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): #ROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): Approximately five percent (5%) 1 EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PAncioal Bldg.: 28' - 3" / Accessorv Bl(jo: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindoal Bldo.: 40 ' Cdt dl~ey) / Accessory Blda: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: To Be Determined Two (2) EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: Three (3) (Not including Affordable Housing) Four (4) EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: See attached letter from Vann Associates SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: None Front: None Front: Nnnp Rear: None Rear: Nonp Rear: Nonc Side: None Side: Nnnp Side: None Combined Front/Rear: Noen Combined FrURr: Non p Combined FronVRear: Nnnp EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ None ENCROACHMENTS: Eight (8) inches over the westerly border onto Int J VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible lor Landmarks Onlv: character com Dalibililv finding must be made by HPCE NA FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: NA SETBACKS: Front: NA Parking Spaces: No on-site parkinc Rear: NA Open Space (Commerdal): 379 qq.ft Side: NA Height (Cottage Infill Only): NA Combined FrWRI: NA Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): NA ATmalMENT 1 EXHIBIT K . 1) Project Name Isis Building Historic Preservation/Adaptive Reuse 2) Proj ect Location 406 E. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, Colorado - Lots K, L and M, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pit County, Colorado. (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning Commercial Core (CC) 4) Lat Size 9,000 sq.ft. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Isis Limited Liability Company c/o Houston and 0'Leary Inc., 305 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611-925-8664 6) Representativels Name, Address & phone ~ Charles Cunniffe Archi tects 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, CO 81611-925-5590 7) Type of Application (please c:heck all that apply): Conditional Use Ccnceptual SPA X Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review ' Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual FUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final RJD X Historic Demolition tMountain View Plane Subdivision X Historic Designation ~ Condaniniumization - Text/Map Amer*hent (NOS Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line (NES E>Eption Adjustment 8) Description of Ekisting Uses (number and type of ecisting structures - approximate sq. ft. ; number of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). Two story brick/sandstone masonry and timber frame construction, containing; Movie Theater: 4,297.0 sq.ft. net leasable Plumbing Shop: 1,469.5 sq.ft. net leasable Dwelling Unit: 753.0 sq.ft. net leasable (2 bedroom) 9) Description of Development Applicatian See attached letter 10) Have you attached the following? X Respanse to Attachment 2, Minimum Submissian Contents X Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Cantents x Respanse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Applicatian .. /1. July 26,1995 00 ARCHITECTURE Ms. Amy Amidon PLANNING Historic Preservation Officer INTERIORS Aspen Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado Re: Isis Theater Building ( AKA the H. Webber Building ) Dear Amy: Please consider this letter as an application to the Historic Preservation Committee for Historic Landmark Designation under the standards of Section 7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Code as well as Conceptual Development Plan Approval under the standards of Section 7-601.D and F, and Partial Demolition under the standards of Section 7-602.C and G. f Charles Cunniffe Architects and Vann Associates have been engaged by the Applicant to study the feasibility and develop a proposal for the Historic Preservation and Adaptive Reuse of the H.Webber Building ( now known as the Isis Theater Building ), located at 406 E.Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado. The property is currently owned by Dominic and Kitty Linza. Please refer to Exhibit A, Title Commitment. The Owners have authorized the buyer of the property, Isis LLC, to make this Application. Please refer to Exhibit B, Permission to Apply. Sam Houston, the General Manager of Isis LLC, will act on behalf of the Applicant. He has further authorized Charles Cunniffe and Vann Associates to process the Application on behalf of the Applicant. Please refer to Exhibit C, Permission to Represent. The List of Adjacent Property Owners is attached as Exhibit D. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS · 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE · SUITE 301 · ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 · 303/925-5590 FAX 303/p25-5076 CIA .. Project Site The Project Site consists of Lots K and L ( where the existing building is located ),and Lot M ( currently vacant ), of Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Please refer to Exhibit E, Vicinity Map The Lots contain 9,000 sq. ft. of land area. The site dimensions are; 90 feet along the street boundary facing Hopkins Avenue by 100 feet from the street boundary toward the alley to the North. The current zoning is Commercial Core ( CC ). Originally built in 1892, the existing building is a two-story brick and timber structure which contains approximately 8,045 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The majority of the ground level and a portion of the upper level are currently in use as a movie theater. A portion of the ground level to the East is currently unoccupied, but was used as a plumbing shop until quite recently. The majority of the upper level is currently in use as a two-bedroom dwelling unit, occupied by the current owner of the building. The original use of the building is believed to have been commercial. A map of the town dated 1904 shows a printing shop and a plumbing shop as well as an assay office on the currently vacant lot. Please refer to Exhibit F. There was a one-story wood frame structure adjacent to the existing building which was evidently demolished sometime after the 1920's. An historic photograph of the building taken sometime in the 1920's shows both the existing brick building and the wooden building, which was then evidently being used as a barber shop. The brick building apparently was already being used as a theater during the silent movie era. Please refer to Exhibit F and G. All of the above referenced historic documents were obtained courtesy of the Stallard House / Aspen Historic Museum archives. Other buildings of the same era which are still standing in the vicinity of the subject building are; the Collins Block ( now known as the Caribou Club Building ), the Chitwood Plaza Building ( now occupied by the Cantina Restaurant ), and the Brand Building. All of these buildings have been extensively remodeled and added to for adaptive reuse, restored and granted Historic Landmark Designation. Other buildings of more recent vintage in the neighborhood are; the Mill Street Plaza, the Norwest Bank Building, the Fox Photo building, the Aspen Fire Department vehicle barn and headquarters, the Thrift Shop and the soon-to-be completed Kandycom Building. 2 .. Proposed Development It is our intent to preserve the current large screen movie theater use and ambience in addition to preserving and restoring the historic street facade of the existing building. Present day economics of the movie theater business dictate that a multiplex format be utilized to offer greater selection and flexibility of scheduling to be competitive. We propose to have two theaters in a new basement level and two theaters on the ground level. This will also allow for the accommodation of local civic and cultural events, such as the Aspen Ski Club meetings and benefits and the Fall Filmfest, without undue economic hardship. The upper two levels will be occupied by a free market dwelling unit, to replace the existing one, and affordable housing. The building will be designed to comply with the ADA guidelines for handicapped access. As the attached Schematic Architectural Drawings illustrate, the historic street facade will be preserved in place. Please refer to Exhibit I. This will be accomplished by bolting a steel framework on the back side which will be supported by structural shoring and underpinning during construction. The existing West wall of the building will be preserved and / or rebuilt using the existing bricks. The existing East wall will be dismantled to allow for the proposed new configuration . The bricks will be saved and reused in the construction of the approximately 18 ft. long return wall to the new construction. The remainder of the existing building, including the alley wall, will be demolished to accommodate the new portions of the proposed building, which will be of steel frame and brick masonry construction. The new portions of the building will be set well back from the historic facade to provide distinct definition and deference to the historic portion of the building. The non-historic overlay of wood siding and shingle roofed marquee, which were added to the historic facade sometime in the early 1960's, will be removed and the facade will be restored as nearly as possible to the original configuration. From our initial work session with HPC, we received some feedback on our initial concept drawings, which we have attempted to incorporate into our current concept as presented herewith. Approval to expand the existing use of an historic building is exempt from the Growth Management Quota System, subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Board. Following Conceptual Development Plan approval by HPC, the Applicant will submit a GMQS Exemption Application and approval by P&Z. 3 .. Review Requirements As stated earlier, this Application requests review and approval in three separate Sections of the Aspen Land Use Code; Conceptual Development Plan Review, Partial Demolition and Historic Landmark Designation. Since the success of this application hinges upon the approval of Historic Landmark Designation, we will begin with this section. Historic Landmark Designation Pursuant to the standards of Section 7-702, D of the Aspen Land Use Code, we believe the H. Webber / Isis building is eligible for Historic Landmark Designation under the following categories: A. Historic Importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States: This standard is not applicable to this project. B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character: The architecture of the street facade of the H. Webber building is characteristic of the brick and sandstone Victorian buildings of the mining era of Aspen in the late nineteenth century. It was built in 1892 as evidenced by the building name / date plague that is on the parapet of the historic facade. See historic photograph, Exhibit H. C. Architectural Importance. The structure of site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significance or unique architectural type or specimen: As stated above, the architecture of the street facade of this building is characteristic of the brick and sandstone Victorian buildings of the mining era of Aspen in the late nineteenth century. D. Architectural Importance. The structure is significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen: This standard is not applicable to this building. 4 .. E. Neighborhood character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historical neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character: This standard is not applicable to this building. F. Community character. The structure of site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures of historical or architectural importance: As stated earlier, this building is similar in size and architectural character to three nearby buildings that have received Historic Landmark Designation: The Chitwood Plaza Building, the Collins Block and the Brand Building. The preservation, restoration and designation of this building will further the community goal of preserving the historical character of downtown Aspen. Conceptual Development Plan Pursuant to the standards of Section 7-601.D.1. of the Aspen Land Use Code, we believe the proposed development is deserving of approval by the Historic Preservation Committee. Our response to those standards is as follows: a. The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the property and with development on adjacent parcels: As stated earlier, the proposed development will be set well back on the site from the historic facade, which is the only portion which had been and will be primarily visible from the street. Also, the restoration will be done by utilizing the salvaged bricks from the portions of the existing side walls that are to be demolished. The new additions will be built using a darker shade of compatible color brick with sandstone lintels, etc, which will compliment with, but be subordinate to the historic facade. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood: As stated earlier, there are three buildings in the immediate neighborhood which bave been historically designated. They are; the Chitwood plaza Building, the Collins Block and the Brand Building. All of these buildings have been extensively remodeled for adaptive reuse and 5 .. added to, in addition to historic renovation, similar to the proposed development of this project. All of these buildings are characteristic of the Victorian brick and sandstone architecture of the mining era of Aspen. The proposed additions to the subject building will be of similar materials and detailing to be compatible with but not imitative of the historic facade. This is in compliance with the stated directive from the HPC in our initial work session. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures on the parcel: As stated earlier, we propose to not only preserve the historic facade of this building, but to preserve the big screen movie theater use and ambience that has been an important part of the social life of the Aspen community since the 1920's. d. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof: As stated earlier, the proposed additions will be of compatible colors, materials and detailing which will be complimentary to the historic facade, but subordinate to it. The historic facade will be given further importance by placing the additions well back on the site and placing an open plaza area at the street on the east side. In addition to the above, the Applicant is required to address the provisions of Section 7-601.F.3. Our response is as follows: 3. Conceptual Development Plan. a. Development application of conceptual development plan. (1) The general application information required in Section 6-202. Please refer to Exhibit J, Supplement to Historic Preservation Development Applications, and Exhibit K, Attachment 1, Land Use Application Form. (2) A sketch plan of the proposed development showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. Please refer to Exhibit I, Conceptual Architectural Drawings. (3) Conceptual selection of major building materials to be used in the proposed development. 6 .. As stated earlier, under Conceptual Development Plan standards a. and b., the restoration of the historic facade will be done by utilizing the salvaged bricks from the portions of the existing side walls that are to be demolished. The new additions will be built using a darker shade of compatible color brick with sgndstone lintels, etc., which will be complimentary with the historic facade. The existing historic facade windows will be restored as needed. The new windows and doors will be of a similar style and color that is compatible, but will distinguish the new additions from the historic facade. (4) A statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure and / or character of the neighborhood. As stated earlier, the proposed additions will be complimentary with, but subordinate to, the existing historic facade, which was originally the only significant facade visible from the street. The additions will be set well back from the historic facade to accentuate its importance. The historic neighborhood character will be preserved and enhanced by this development. Partial Demolition Pursuant to the standards bf Section 7-602.C, We believe the proposed development is deserving of approval for partial demolition as follows: 1. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure: As stated earlier, the incorporation of the multiplex theater format for this development is required in order to make the preservation of the theater use of this site economically viable. Furthermore, the construction of a full basement, which will house two of the theaters, necessitates the demolition and removal of the bulk of the existing structure. The historic facade, which embodies the essence of the historic significance of this building, will be preserved in place with a steel framework on the back side which will be supported by structural shoring and underpinning during construction. 1 .. 2. The Applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic importance of the structure or structures located on the parcel: As stated earlier, the two story street facade is the essential historic element of this building. It will be preserved in place and the recently added non-historic wood veneer and marquee structure will be removed to allow for restoring the brick masonry, using the bricks salvaged from the demolition of the East wall as needed, to return the facade to as near to original condition as possible. To the greatest extent possible, the existing historic windows will also be preserved and restored. b. Impacts on the architectural integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel: As stated earlier the proposed development precludes utilizing the majority of the existing structure, which does not have a basement and could not support the two additional floors of construction. The integrity of the historically significant street facade will be preserved in its original place and restored as nearly as possible to its original condition. In closing, we believe this Proposed Development is in keeping with the community goal of preserving the historic character of downtown Aspen, and deserves Historic Landmark Designation and Conceptual Development Plan approval by the Historic Preservation committee. We appreciate your cooperation in this application process and will be glad to provide any further documentation which you think may be helpful in your review. Sincerely, Charles L. Cunniffe, AIA' v Principal in Charge 8 .. W. LE APPENDIX A ARCHITECTURE List of Exhibits PLANNING INTERIORS Exhibit A: Title Commitment Exhibit B: Owner Authorization to Isis LLC Permission to Apply Exhibit C: Applicant Authorization to Charles Cunniffe Architects & Vann Associates Permission to Represent Exhibit D: List of Adjacent Property Owners Exhibit E: Vicinity Map Exhibit F: 1904 City Map Exhibit G: Historic Facade Photograph Exhibit H: Historic Detail Photograph of Building Plague Exhibit I: Conceptual Architectural Drawings Exhibit J: Supplement to Historic Preservation Development Applications Exhibit K: Attachment 1, Land Use Application Form CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS · 520 EAST HYMAN · SUITE 301 · ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 · 970/925-5590 FAX 970/925-5076 CIA · JUL 21 '95 15:35 PITKIW.COUNTY TITLE AARAARAAARAA EXHIBIT A .. NII COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 07/01/95 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT10050 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ TBD Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate:RE-ISSUE RATE PROFORMA (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: Tax Certificate $20.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: DOMINIC LINZA and KATHRYN A. LINZA 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOTS L, M AND N, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. TOGETHER WITH an easement for encroachment on Lot K, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen as set forth in Deed recorded in Book 347 at Page 988. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules Fax 303-925-6527 A and B are attached.. , · JUL 21 ' 95 15: 36 PITKLW.COUNTY TITLE AAAAAAAAAAAA .. NTI SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO.ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE. - JUL 21 '95 15:36 PITKIV.COUNTY TITLE AARAARAARAAA .. NTI SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, enchroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 144, 160 and 521 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws" . 8. Terms, conditions and provisions of Notice of Historic Designation recorded in Book 295 at Page 515. 9. Deed of Trust from : Dominic Linza and Kathryn A. Linza To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : Charles Tesitor, Personal Representative of the estate of Marjorie P. Jenkinson Original Amount : $500,000.00 Dated : , 1994* Recorded : June 24, 1994 in Book 754 at Page 37 Reception No. : 371410 This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT10050 A and B are attached. . 1 - JUL 21 '95 15:37 PITKIW.COUNTY TITLE AAAAAaAAAAAA . NTI ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (l) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominim or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided " Gap Coverage" . Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT10050 A and B are attached. ..te EXHIBIT B 1515 THEATRE t· Dominic 6 Kathryn Urizo Plo, BOX 180 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 July 26, 1995 To Whom It May Concern: This letter hereby grants to the Isis LLC, as holders of an option to purchase the Isis Theatre, the right to submit such land use applications as may be necessary to obtain approval for the redevelopment of the Isis property for threatre purposes. After reviewing the plans that the Isis LLC are submitting to you, we are 100% supportive of the proposed plans. We would like to take this opportunity to say how happy we are that their intent is to keep theatres in this location. Yours most sincerely, Dominic and Kathryn A. Linza /1104~»/192// 408 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-7909 ~ EXHIBIT C ISIS L.L.C. July 21, 1995 Ms. Leslie Lamont and Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Leslie and Amy: This letter authorizes Sonny Vann & Associates and Charles Cunniffe, Architects, to represent "us" in the processing of such applications as may be required to obtain approval for the redevelopment of the Isis property. Most sincerelz, k.rle9 p i V' --' Sam Houston 0 As Manager of ISIS L.L.C. 305 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)925-8664 EXHIBIT D PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, 3RD FLOOR Vincent J. Higens ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Christina Davis President 303-925-1766 : 303-925-6527 FAX Vice President 300' OWNER'S LIST Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado, hereby certifies the following list is a current list of property owner's within three hundred feet of LOTS L, M AND N, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, obtained from the most current Pitkin County Assessors Tax Rolls. NAMES AND ADDRESSES TAX SCHEDULE NUMBER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE REFER TO LIST ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF *20« AUTHO..IZEI SIGNATURE .. 316 E. HOPKINS, INC. 2737-073-29-008 715 W. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 ALH HOLDING COMPANY 2737-073-30-005 435 W. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN ARCADE, LTD. 2737-073-38-008 1148 4TH ST. SANTA MONICA CA 90403 ASPEN ART INVESTMENT, INC. 2737-073-43-009,010 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR. #B ASPEN CO 81611 BANK OF ASPEN 2737-073-29-009 C/O AUTAX, INC. P.O. BOX 2798 LITTLETON CO 80161 CARL R. BERGMAN 2737-073-29-002,003 CATHERINE M. BERGMAN P.O. BOX 1365 ASPEN CO 81612 CBI PROPERTIES, INC. 2737-073-22-014 C/O LOWELL MEYER 517 W. NORTH ST. ASPEN CO 81611 CENTRE OF ASPEN, LLC 2737-073-29-004 ANDREW V. HECHT 601 E. HYMAN AVE. ASPEN CO 81611 CHITWOOD PLAZA CO. 2737-073-30-421,702 C/O THE FLEISHER CO. 200 E. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 DAVID DENSON 2737-073-43-011,012 KATHLEEN DENSON 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL CO 81657 .. DUVIKE, INC. 2737-073-39-020 THRU 027 P.O. BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS, INC. 2737-073-43-004 210 SO. MILL ST., STE. 201 ASPEN CO 81611 G.E. BULLOCK CHILDREN'S TRUST 2737-073-40-701 C/O SUZETTE GOODMAN 7601 SCOTT HAMILTON DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 GALENA PLAZA, LLC 2737-073-22-013 C/O LOWELL MEYER 517 W. NORTH ST. ASPEN CO 81611 HARLEY A. BALDWIN II 2737-073-39-001,704 2737-073-46-001 THRU 205 SO. GALENA 009,011,012,014,016 ASPEN CO 81611 HILLAS OF SNOWMASS, INC. 2737-073-43-014 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL CO 81657 HOTEL JEROME ASSOCIATES L.P. 2737-073-21-001 330 E. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 JEAN PIERRE ODIER 2737-073-46-010 P.O. BOX 88 ASPEN CO 81612 KANDYCOM, INC. 2737-073-39-002 P.O. BOX 1135 MAMMOTH LAKE CA 93546 LA COCINA, INC. 2737-073-29-007 P.O. BOX 4010 ASPEN CO 81612 .. LEWIS I. SCHAINUCK 2737-073-22-004 MICHELLE T. SCHAINUCK THRU 012 3650 SOUTH STREET STE. 301 LAKEWOOD CA 90712 LINDA H. JEMISON 2737-073-46-013 RICHARD H. JEMISON 1524 CANYON ROAD SANTA FE NM 87501 LOMA ALTA CORPORATION 2737-073-39-010,011 P.O. BOX 8105 DALLAS TX 75205 M & W ASSOCIATES 2737-073-30-009 205 SO. MILL ST. ASPEN CO 81611 MARGARET M. DOLE 2737-073-43-707 C/O FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARIDGE P.O. BOX 8455 ASPEN CO 81612 MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES 2737-073-38-704 205 SO. MILL ST. STE. 301A ASPEN CO 81611 MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES 80B 2737-073-43-706 C/O HILLIS OF SNOWMASS, INC. 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL CO 81657 PETER GOLDSTEIN 2737-073-43-015 ALAN GOLDSTEIN 150 METRO PARK #2 ROCHESTER NY 14623 RANSOM B. WOODS, JR. 2737-073-39-013 JUSTINE F. WOODS P.O. BOX 12288 ASPEN CO 81612 RYANCO PARTNERS 2737-073-30-007 C/O PAT SMITH 715 W. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 SABBATININ SPORC, INC. 2737-073-39-014 0 0 230 SO. MILL ST. ASPEN CO 81611 WALTER F. HAMPEL, JR. 2737-073-39-008 255 MORTN ST. EXTENSION MARATHON FL 33050 WENDELIN ASSOCIATES 2737-073-43-001,002, 003,005,013 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC 2737-073-39-012 217 SO. GALENA ASPEN CO 81611 WILLIAM W. WHEELER 2737-073-46-015 INGRID J. WHEELER 3241 WEST DRY CREEK RD. HELDSBURG CA 95448 . 0 EXHIBIT E LOCATION MAP t. \ X - 4. 7 w/94,4.4- ---- - *.K- ~4%$ 1~ 0 -4--1 ~,~,S<.~#4~ 4,- -~-',77 144-~.1#$~41 4%\..1 3,-- -- ~~ No#44420* .-~w·-- -·----~· 4*~>-A' ~~ ./----' '' / 44. Or. i Mountain VIew Dr & s#, U -27 4 4 1% r 4990< 95 11 Snow unny Ct s,58. 14\ . ; --IJD>%4- _13 AN \5 '4-4; V * A t_ --_- _4®* 4 Aspen .74 F ~ - * Hunter 0 Insmile Re:!12 *~-- # - r , li~ 1 ~- Music , Tent Wood 0 ck 07 1 22 1 ) 2 247.14., 9/f 11:tilit' '16 / Gltlesw• St Q, i P• h 1 ·1~Le , 1 - C>.4 , - - Vjv F-----31, 41,1. S, . C F IC#•Sl Aspen f 61 0. / ~ ~ tx~ ~ ~ 9 4 m / 3*4 d _ - 4 */0 * out Ar 7 01 St - 6-3.94 dj//24 21· 1 # 5 ..1/1 Main St 4 4 Pk 2 0 44 IIi,COO;P .4\ 9 0/ ¥,1.1.- P.14' 8 Ints, - 7 40*2 1 < -1%21 .94 I \ 8 '*b'.lb /4 ~ ~· Man C ~ 3 0- -1 11 ¢ 4 A.r . Go , 2 4* 0.4, I 2 . i 6 )#ci) 4,A m l: 4, *4 bummi, ii 3/,4- FBOd MOT 1.A»(1-1014.1 2 . -v·5 4 4- . A Grovi R 409 8. 4+01°k<lp··16 1 IkiRd 14 4 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /. 7-10-95 ISIS RENOVATION LOTS 4M & N kLEY BLOCK 87 ~ 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 520 EAST HYMAN AVE • SUITE 301 • ASPEN, CO 81611 ' TELE: 303925-5590 • FAX: 301925-5076 no E. COLORADO AVE. • TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 303,728-3738 * FAX: 30302$9567 ,1 4 #lin Ibv 11 W ---- - 11 2 U-£1 -1 - 1 ZZ).~ -3 / 2 14 gil ...41% % A i f EX#lIBIT F Ar R. 80X D.H. 400 4(76 404 406 408 4,0 41% 4/4 4/6 4/8 4/2 422 ¥24 426 42 430 432 434 O.H 1 - 500 Ha (4%01 11 (9 0 11 ================= 4, AA,ki N er· 2 11 4\ M 8%6£2*9 51'EKNO 2 10 . 0 4·01'403*=-01%407'2 409 411 413 4/5 41?48 42/ 42 4%5 427 429 43/ 433 435, 50/ 503 77LE-I 01 Mt - - d 3 4 14¢44 R'*1* --6 -48 : 1- L /1 43 4 1412 11 -0-...r-*0 -03£ 'AL *NA ¥r 3 4 k EN:wilt··d 2? -*mit,· Re.Rr F I L 1£1 ~",-4 L 71 0 4 1 12~22£ £:==:* &* 0 ·1_| £ 4OF Gi w. F--711 /94 11 ' 4 04 UN~ c"* 1 e 1771 1/ 4 XI /, I K 2 0 1 1/* N /*\1 * [TRI |X I M 4 r 8. C. a K L M- 87 66 „#M#<p„im,=,p.. 9 o o /K 2 A3.lio~ Fee. 4 I ; Lu i 4/57 1 0 '. 2 R. 5 1,( 1 e /9 01 5 3 - Pl RE ST»,1-~ON < ·-zy- V?*16 9 - 71 i \ 1 .*31=03/*~ ! rmTT k 6 2<*MA 1 0- 0 th s- - 2_1 4.- 6/17 23 MAh.*43 4,·,r -~:666*1 -38 ~9-;fA@A.¤ , N. Ho \ 4 * 2 V % || 400.402 f~~~jJ87<0; 4/2 47446 4/8 427 ·02 424425' 428 €36' 432 437 H.WEBBER BO{ 11 031 I Hor#10 9 AYE. @ v =~~~==h== = == = = = = = ==== ==== 11 40( 403 2054(ra 409 41/ 4/5 4/5 4/7 4/9 48/ 423 ==315 4?7 439 43/ 433 43£ 501 503 & e.-livEl % 227 an V lul '74 - ; f--IUY b , 1,~w=g'=C6,34 ..re...;>/u,w ·, m E-1 ~ , 2-APHI#imimilrfr,18:Eir:jicill,jig 0 - -- V C- i 0,17·41,014'4=1f I AJ- £ 42- ,*fa ,'5:'.#7*6#pr /2 A A®***5:4*1;'§14*17,2 C v o. E. 2 3.-ft-,su;g:i~*I*te. R.~ -> Aso- 9 0 - ,- CefE, ':Al,%71 12 69 I I #12*00*%"/.4/k"m"/k 144403,&, 0 /4.Vic. 51-3>,;,@9=**ii/EEM/"mis#42% % 22¢23-LE ~ ~ 44> A--if. <49%~441 ~ ~ b ki/¢*01*282l '*41LIA 00 %7-4 tao 0 8 .....e™•F"*.4021€..6,«Ar': U. / * e '"Orus·,O. 88 C 1' 4 -. M N, 2 2 rn~L 0- 3 .,40. 33 4 Vac 1/ 1 ac, 28&S 9. (Cow.,R.re I ~ k N'*·799~DN? j 1-N- -J j 1711 1-1 *1:*.*D:~ QQ 11 4 Loo .:-..... d P _-1 -o, 1-11*i>0#t8i..4E~NZD.~m?. 11 '25' t>a =A,-7,4.1*t•~E ' 11 of ~DANaceve 107. 100 ¥N31¥909 01 20 90/ 201 0/1 2/1 W. PIPE 9.0*tu- -L . .' F L=,c.'Crh ' :.:. 7: 1!:f-f: .:.-'. '.' . '. , ... 1.t 42'/ ---. i *ft#>firfrf. ..'~1~< 424*:br.ir. 91. '-. '···'2• 4 -L-2, h -arc,- 4413-1' m h-*' - .. 1 1 46*ki 2-~..'-Il-fL~ ~1 :149. U.;,30:*1 . 2.4.-1'*-7-13....he, rt- - 6 4.I I , .....,1-1 .rli> I =- -*-=--9 4 - U · Ffl ....,14-- f 4: PI ...&-.~ f:&1; .. '. ..1 414 1 0 . % .'*4 , I .:11 tr<41 43 •4 K934}2?.fq~I :4,:~~ 42·*re....f.;6 ·1~~1. t:".I- '' 1.% ,N '•V· it,44 2-1¢' 1 .-2..../.-114. 5~& 241 ~~;i .i .9 ..1.1. . 4 1 •·· - 1,1,111 - 4 4.1 2 45,4.*S 4·65 1 0 4 ..m , > %#.il;i:f '10: 11'.. . Iii . 24,4 2..9 1 1.- 1 2. .t ·rl 9 &4 9 4,25 .. ...0, 1 1 Cm'jit/1.1.:PkrA :t. . 7 ~H~ f ~f#fid.1 'di ,1 >.24,1,17:~; 'l,! 1~ ~ 1 . 1 . I . I ....1/'.' ' I ' i.19/Ar#~ 94' 1 - . 11. 41 1. 1 . ..44 i f -· i •lil, 1 44011]:f ~:-·\f{~i i,-fl ~.-i'~<p{,2.147 -L-59f, ~t .!lf ki - • • , n,:A ',:4 W 71:, 1)1 ... I.P..3;.r·ti.'4 F 'il· ~~~Zf :7.'7 7. '..,-~ ·': 40 r.,4...t. j, %1 . . , 'tw·fAMV ... , cut L. , 16 ' II £ 4 - lEAl 0 litty' EXHIBIT H .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 =~ space to enter these offices. Melanie: Why can't you use the staircase at the alley for the entrance? Brian: I can but it is an alley entrance. Donnelley: This is a difficult presentation to understand. Amy: I feel we should do a site visit again before the public hearing. Les: When we were working on the project next to this building one of the conditions of the joining of the two old buildings and historic designation was that this parcel be left as a park. We went back through the records and a series of records got lost. I was assured that one of the conditions of approval was that nothing should be built on the existing parcel. We couldn't prove it and it was built. What is happening is that this is getting out of hand. A metal staircase is not acceptable. The building is too big and shadows over the historical building. Dennis Green: It only goes down and has no visual impact. Sven: If it is only going down and a site visit would do it. MOTION: Jake moved to table the minor development for 132 W. Main requiring that the applicant provide a basement floor plan in order to provide the use of the below grade space and the subsidy of the variance for the lightwell. I further recommend a site visit be set up prior to the public hearing. Regarding the stair I recommend tabling pending a site visit; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Roger: I see this as messy vitality and I do not have a problem with it between buildings. I was over there and you are going down into something. Amy: The public hearing is scheduled for Sept. 13th. 406 E. HOPKINS - LANDMARK - CONCEPTUAL PH Chairman Donnelley Erdman opened the public hearing. Amy: I am recommending landmark designation finding that standards A, B, D and E are met. Under conceptual we have looked at this twice in a worksession. As far as the roof top development I hope the Board members had a chance to site visit it as the story polls are up. There was a request that the units .be pulled in as much. aa, possible *nd that the chimney mass be elfminated and that the 7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 new upper residential units possibly be of a different material. That there not be outdoor furniture or plantings near the edge of the roof. The arcade element be eliminated. There were comments f in favor of keeping the metal siding in the alley. The applicant , was to provide more information about the appearance of the facade and they have found one more photograph. I had brought up about the alignment of the fenestration between the new and old building and they have dealt with that. The biggest issue to me was the extent of demolition. They are proposing to keep the entire west wall, the front facade and part of the switch back. They will demolish the back wall which is not masonry anyhow and part of the east wall where they have expanded the building. They are going to talk to us about parking waivers. The open space is not our issue but we will discuss it and make a recommendation to P&Z. I feel the Isis sign should be retained. We need to be concerned about the upper floor development and its visibility from up above. The residential design check list does apply to the project but the standards are not sensible for this. I feel we should waive them. John Wheeler, representing the applicant from Charles Cunniffe Architects: Structurally we are keeping 60 to 70% of the shell. We found a photograph dated from 1910 which showed the building before the theatre was there. We are going to pursue restoring the building back to its original state. We have revised the entry elevations. The glass facade is in keeping with what we see around ~ what is happening on the other side. We have gone in and measured town. The four brick columns on one side are not symmetrical to and a few of the bays had not had stone columns. We will recreate the columns. The roof top addition as we went into the structural studies we will underpin and the new structure supports the new wall which is then set in to the inside of the brick. Jake: What is the upper surface material? John Wheeler: Stucco but we could talk about different materials. It is on the property line and needs to be a 2HR rated wall with stucco on block. We have also introduced some tile elements. We have eliminated the chimney mass. The intent was to pick a different colored brick that stands off against the original facade. This is a similar treatment that you would find on the elks building. The other portion of this was to look at the window fenestration and we picked up the kick plates that could be done in a victorian motif. We have carried the original treatment into the new addition which may or may not be appropriate. It blends in with the existing and is a subtle transition. The difference in the three elevations is very subtle, one study is the entry door with a single entry and not accentuated. One shows corner particulations and one shows a double window similar to the ones that are on the upper level of the Isis. 9 8 122 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 Jake: What is the addition, stucco? John Wheeler: The addition is brick and on the upper levels we have gone into the stucco. The utilitarian brick is on the side and .there is face brick on the front. We will bring the building back as best we can and we will clean the mortar joints. As it wraps around the building it will give a good delineation. With the colors we are showing sandstone that could be a precast. John Wheeler: On the front facade of the existing building the two end windows will be display windows due to an elevator behind them. There will be two sets of windows open to the lobby. John Wheeler: The side elevation from the fire station would have red brick introduced and possibly the tile with stucco introduced to the back. In the back we have metal siding which is a copper applied shingle. Melanie: In the plans it indicates a setback for the addition and what is the amount of footage for that setback? John Wheeler: I had a short setback but we can do what the Board wants. Sven: I would suggest at least two feet. John Wheeler: I appears that the building was only in its original condition for a short period of time. Roger: The new addition seems rather busy and how would you simplify that? John Wheeler: I like the double windows because they are in keeping with what is on the original building and I like the non accentuated columns. I also feel the complexity is in the material selection. Amy: On the alley side of the building I was talking about retaining the existing metal as a veneer. Chairman Donnelley Erdman closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Donnelley: A month ago Sunny introduced the project and a statement was made that the largest of the four theatres would be the approximate side of the existing Isis and fulfill some of the functions that the existing Isis does. The Isis is 380 seats and this is 250 seats. It would not fulfill that questions. Was the 250 seats arrived at programmatically or was it arrived at because J 9 - .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 it worked better in the plan? Sunny Vann: The intent is to keep a large theatre in the Isis that could provide sbme of the same functions of the Isis. The screen in the largeet theatre is as large or larger than the screen that is currently in the Isis. There is a reduction in seats in theatre A but the intent is to make the theatre available for functions that have occurred in the past. There are discussions about filmfests continued use right now and possibly an initial opening as a benefit for filmfest to help fund them. Donnelley: 380 seats is not a large capacity and what we have here is another Stage three situation. The community needs a large theatre and I was wondering if it is possible to have a larger theatre. Sunny Vann: The reality of why it is changed is because of the movie business today. You cannot take a large theatre and get a major run picture and keep it open in a community like this. The theatres have to work in todays theatre market. The ability here is to draw major first run productions and book them in the main theatre and as · attendance drops of f you will be able to move it into a smaller theatre. You have to keep the movie for a period of time. You could also double run the movie. In this particular configuration you could not have one large theatre. You can still ~ accommodate the same number of people but not necessarily all together. Donnelley: My thought was to up A to 300 and reduce B to 160 to have one large, two midsize and one small. Sunny Vann: If this goes through individuals will be drawn in who are involved in the theatre business to fine tune the nature of the operation. Roger: I feel the six points have been addressed. On the alley I would retain the existing metal without cleaning it and would urge that the electrical heaters and conduit be cleaned up and put some other place. In regards to the redesign of the front I feel you are going in the right direction. I would encourage that the columns should be brought back. John Wheeler: I feel they are cast iron and fluted. Roger: With regards to the new structure on the east and south facing I would encourage that only one material be used. Keep it contemporary and clean and extremely simple. It should not compete with the historic resource. I am not sure about the fenestration on top. In regards to the apartments I would suggest you use colored stucco and liven it up. I would also approve landmark t 10 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 321~ designation. Les: I agree with designation and the front and open space are OK. We need to write a letter on the parking waiver. The metal should be retained in the alley. You might mention to the new owners that the physical experience of a large theatre there should not be underestimated in this community. If there is a chance to add a few seats and move around a little that is much more important than the view site. Linda: The little odd things on the west elevation by Fox photo does that have to stay on the historical building? Amy: It is connected to the historical building. I am sure we cannot force them to take it away. Linda: I am having trouble with the shedish flat style roof tops. It looks so boxy and I feel they need to be different but tie into the historic building. The mass of the flat roofs seems way too massive. There is so much mass right on top. Susan: The only thing I would change is the opening in the front like an arcade. It goes along with the old facade. Sven: After you changed from post modern to the new photos I much ~ prefer the new ones. To resolve the corner of the two buildings ,, you could almost do a whimsical tower to tie into the fire station. You can see where that could actually be designed that way. I would like to see more work on the alley stair. My most concern is the east elevatiori and the residential roof framing. On the model it looks ok but on the drawings it looks like an area of concern to me. As you look through the opening from the pedestrian level you see a wall and I feel the east elevation need changed. On the housing level you were showing a painted wood cornice above brick. I am afraid the quasi historic detail up there will not look appropriate due to the way the roofs and units are arranged. I am not sure that we need more complexity on the roof when they look like apartment flats. Something more contemporary. I am also not fond of the stucco and would prefer vertical wood siding. The last issue gets back to Linda's comments and I am wondering if there is a way of solving the roof structures to tie them all together so that you can read the structure and it doesn't look like you put a roof only where you needed a roof. Right now there are several things and I would rather see them integrated into one. Possibly trellis connectors. The comment that I am sharing with Linda is that I would like to see something that cohesively ties j the roofs together., All this is related to the east elevation. Donnelley: Or doesn't show roofs at all. 11 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 Jake: First of all I have a technical problem with the landmark and the Lots K, L, and M block 87. On the map where the plumbing lot was it is called lot N. It is amazing that you can have an 8,000 sqft. FAR and propose 17,800 which is almost 125% more FAR on this historical building. /It appears that lot N is not part of the legal description of the landmark. Sunny Vann: The application is requesting designation of the three lots that the theatre sits on which are K,L and M. Amy: I see Jake's point and we should be land marking the entire parcel which includes N. Sunny Vann: N is the corner lot which we do not own. Amy: Does K, L and M include the open lot? Sunny Vann: Yes. N is not our property and it is not part of this application. Amy: Jake is looking at this and K, L and M take up the entire property. Sven: Fox photo is on Lot J. Sunny Vann: The west side is lot K which is 3,000 sqft. L is 3,000 sqft. and M is 3,000 sqft. The theatre sits on K and L. M is vacant. There was a small structure sitting on the vacant lot at one time. Jan Darrington: Something is off on the survey as it states L, M and N. Amy: K should be the corner lot. I see the problem this map is labeling the bays of the buildings as lots which isn't right. Jake: I am still having trouble with an 8,000 sqft. landmark on to which we are adding 9,000 sqft. additional FAR. How do you do that and still have an historical resource. If they are taking advantage of all the parking and mitigation then the restoration effort should be very loyal. John Wheeler: It is on the exterior. Jake: Yes, you have done a great job on that. When I think about filling up 95% of the lot coverage and only 5% left. All the parking is waived and I think of the impact on that corner. Sven: I think that is why I wanted the roof simplified. 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 Donnelley: I have a greater problem and it is with everything except the historical restoration. I find the roof footprint of the housing compliment to be building and not architecture. This is what really distresses me as we are saving an important piece li~ of architecture and overlaying it with' a very insignificant building project.r Even by looking at the plan it is a very confusing and there is no way to grasp what is going on up there. The flat roof is added like a hat in a very pedestrian manner. What happens up there should be elegant and understated. If the brick you use in the addition is indeed going to be brick then there should be something really inspired about it, maybe a specialty brick that is very smooth and hard fired almost like tile with curved corners. If the windows are going to retain the same expression as the historic then the way the windows are dealt with has to do with the way the entire exterior is dealt with. It is a wonderful opportunity not to come up with the usual Aspen solution which is string courses of Colo. red sandstone and face brick. Right now I find it very pedestrian. At the turn of century Sullivan used some wonderful brick that had curved special profiles for corners and was very hard fired and smooth. Maybe use even a different size as you abut to the historic resource. I feel it needs a lot of study. The location of windows and fenestration etc. in the addition to the east, the first two stories are fine. The development of that could be magnificent. John Wheeler: What happens on the upper level is the project and I hope we can do that with materials and possibly consolidate the space. Sven: It is the roof cohesion of all the roofs and not using a quasi historic fascia. Donnelley: I agree with Jake that the historic facade will be superb. Development standard #3 is something that I am concerned with now. Sven: The theatre operation design if fine. Amy: I agree that the Commission has good comments. Donnelley: Is it clear John? John Wheeler: Absolutely, we have the historic down but we need to turn our sites on the addition and go back and do a design charette. Amy: I have a question about the affordable housing on the roof and my impression is that you are providing more than you really need to and I wonder if any of the commission feels like you would like to see some of that mass not there. -,2 la .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 Sunny Vann: Let me clarify that as we have to go through P&Z and get an exemption from the growth management ordinance and as part of that we must mitigate a percentage of our affordable housing. They use an absolute standard for how many employeeb are generated based on the square footage. If we use the standard generation factor then we have enough housing UP there to meet the requirements under the code. We know however that we have more housing because it is a theatre and we intend to try and make an argument that we have more than enough housing but we do not know whether the P&Z or Housing will go along with the argument. So at this point if we were to take the housing off and they do not go along with the generation factors that we are going to use and they hold us to some general standard of the community then we will be deficient. If the P&Z and Housing authority state that we do not need all this housing then it is something we can address subsequent to that review. Amy: It is possible that we could get a referral comment from housing to get a general view. We can also recommend to P&Z that we are uncomfortable with the housing addition. Sven: The housing looks too much like flats. Les: I would hate to see this particular project go away and retaining a community use is wonderful. Sunny: I do not think your request to restudy the upper level is unreasonable. If you look at the story polls the visibility of the rooftop is primarily from the east elevation. Jake: I am a real proponent of eliminating employee housing from landmarks. I feel that requirement here and on Main Street destroys the landmark because it puts so much impact of volume of new space on the landmark. I would support waiving employee housing or paying cash in lieu. Amy: I feel we will have to pull the Housing Authority into this and see what their opinion is. Jake: As far as I know demolition is measured by FAR. Amy: You may have an issue with that. Demolition is when you get rid of the roof and you might want to check with Bill Drueding and if you are taking the roof away he might call the building demolished. Sven: You have two choices a compatible back drop to the historic building which is the case of the Googenheim addition or what I was searching for is the expression of a nice roof solution that would / 14 - .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 1 j woos us into approving this. John Wheeler: Am I hearing that you are directing us to look at the massing on top of the roof. 1 Donnelley: As well as how architecturally the surface treatment is done. We all would like to see the reduction of the amount of bulk form. Donnelley: We can take a straw vgte as to whether HPC would like to see the bulk form oh thd-rbof reduced Er Straw poll taken and all ~,g,ted .for :reduction of bulk .. . * 4.· &824'*·4*4~; ·••1' L. Donnelley: Basically you have a set floor plan John and will the foot print stay the same or are you going to be able to explore. John Wheeler: This is an independent entity above the theatres and we can design this area in a number of different scenarios. We are still going to put 6,000 sqft. up there and that is where it has to go. 4,000 sqft. is employee and 2,000 replaces the existing residential and the rest goes below grade. Amy: I will get a meeting as soon as possible. John Wheeler: If we can get some reliance that is the way we can , 90. The employee housing is not a sale factor here. Amy: We can table with positive thoughts. Sven: It is the conceptual development of the roof top housing that the Commission is having trouble with. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC recommend landmark designation for 406 E. Hopkins Lots L,M and N Block 87 City and Townsite of Aspen finding that standards A, B, D, and E are met; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Roger moved to table conceptual review and continue the public hearing for 406 E. Hopkins to August 23rd. for the following reasons: Study with the housing department to address concerns of over building on a parcel with an historic building; second by Melanie. Les: They need to know before they leave today that we are in agreement on the parking waiver and in agreement on the open space reduction. AMENDED SECOND MOTION: Roger amended his motion that HPC approves the parking waiver and the open space reduction; second by Melanie. Question was called by Chairman Donnelley Erdman on the second 15 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 motion and amended motion, passed 5 - 2. Opposed were Sven and Jake. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant partial demolition to 406 E. 1 Hopkins and that partial demolition is to be part of the east wall ,' and the entire alley wall. During the demolition the tin should be saved for reuse; second by Les. DISCUSSION Amy: We will need to discuss the roof with Bill Drueding and it is important that we discuss how the demolition is handled from a public relations standpoint. I do not want to have a shell or rather a couple of walls that the public will look at. Donnelley: I think it is premature to grant partial demolition until we have a conceptual plan. Amy: I agree. Jake: We need demolition drawings that indicate what is to be demolished. The demolition percentage needs to be verified by Bill Drueding and a demolition strategy. John Wheeler: The only place to access the site is off the open lot. Roger withdrew his motion. John Wheeler: I hope we can reduce the employee housing requirement. MOTION: Les moved to adjourn; second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk -I 16 1~~395@INF)--~~-~ A Li , AUG 9 1995 li /lgenver. Colorado CHARLES CUNNUE & ASSOC vail, colorado ASPEN, CO Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. August 8, 1995 Charles Cunniffe & Associates 520 East Hyman Ave., Suite 301 Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Mr. Jan Derrington Re: Isis Theater Gentlemen: On August 3, 1995, we made an observation of the existing Isis Theater. The purpose of our observation was to review the existing structure and front, west, and east masonry walls with regard to the proposed construction. We feel that the existing front masonry wall and the east masonry wall can be preserved in place when the proposed basement and building is constructed. Similarly the east masonry wall can be preserved to the extent that it will be incorporated into the new building design. Shoring and underpinning the masonry walls can be accomplished while maintaining these existing masonry walls. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. lA»--nic ./1 William H. Newe~/P.IE. el 8 -•4% ls: Principal < .4 1 11391 1= #0..0 9.0/ '>€4al"40'0<S..' b i.3 15681 ~ 0 . *G' 9/ t' A V \ 0 .1*1 WILLIAM H. NEWELL, *3;642*&16 1660 Seventeenth St. * Suite 350 • Denver. Colorado 80202 . (303)623-4927 •FAX (303)623-6602 0 0 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 406.EH Photo Information: ASP-CC-2-7 & 8 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Webber Block / Isis Theatre Full Street Address: 406 East Hopkins Legal Description: Lots K. L. M. Block 87 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Commercial Core Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Commercial Architectural Style: Victorian Italianate Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Flat Walls: Corbeled brick pattern and oqeed. pressed tin cornice. block name pediment at center of cornice is topped by acorn finial. framed bv brick Diers; board and batten facade extends width of south facade at 1st floor; original brick at 2nd floor Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): None Windows: Fixed glass. 1st floor; 1 over 1 paired or single double hung; second floor with sandstone head and lintel Doors: Solic core wood with view panels; 2 double, 1 single Porches: Wood shake shingle. hipped canopy with gable at center; cantilevered, extends width of south facade at 1st floor General Architectural Description: A typical Aspen commercial build- ing constructed of brick with sandstone trim. Corbeled brick lines the cornice with some pressed tin and the block name pediment. .. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 406.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Quavle Original use: Commercial Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Commercial Construction Date: 1892 X Actual _ Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: First floor facade completely altered; e.q.. board and batten and wood shake shingle canopv; wood shutters on second floor -- all dates unknown Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: This commercial brick building was built for Henry Webber. Aspen's shoe merchant. H. Webber- 1892 sets in the pediment on the roof of the structure, a typical wav of identifying a building in those davs. The building had furnished rooms; groceries and storage; gold curator and hardware facilities. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Map Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner . e »ET» \ /44 .di £ AUG 0 1 1995 1 VANN ASSOCIATES t Planning Consultants August 1,1995 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Amy Amidon Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Isis Conceptual Development Plan Review Dear Amy: The purpose of my letter is to address the parking and open space requirements of the proposed Isis Theatre project. Please consider the following a supplement to the conceptual development plan application which was prepared and submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission by Charles Cunniffe Architects on behalf of Isis, LLC, the project Applicant. Parking The Isis Theatre property is zoned CC, Commercial Core. Pursuant to Section 5- 209.E.3. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations, two (2) off-street parking spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of net leasable area are required to mitigate any increase in the existing theatre's commercial area. These spaces, however, may be provided via a payment in lieu pursuant to Section 7-404.B. of the Code. Pursuant to Section 5-209.E.1., no parking spaces are required for residential uses which are located within a historic landmark. As the Applicant proposes to increase the theatre's net commercial leasable area by approximately six thousand (6,000) square feet, twelve (12) parking spaces, or a cash payment in lieu thereof, are theoretically required to mitigate the additional commer- cial square footage. No parking is required for the proposed free market and afford- able housing units, as approval has been requested to designate the building as a historic landmark. Please note, however, that Section 8-204.B.c.(2) of the Code, as amended by Ordi- nance 54-94 (i.e., the recent GMQS amendment ordinance),also addresses the provision of parking when associated with the expansion of a historic landmark. This section provides as follows. 230 East Hopkins Avenue · Aspen, Colorado 81611 · 303/925-6958 · Fax 303/920-9310 .. Ms. Amy Amidon August 1, 1995 Page 2 "Parking shall be provided according to the standards of Article 5, Division 2 and Division 3, iJ HPC determines that it can be provided on the site's surface and be consistent with the review standards of Article 7, Division 6. Any parking which cannot be located on-site and which therefore be re- quired to be provided via a cash-in-lieu payment shall be waived." As the Applicant's conceptual development plan does not contemplate on-site parking, approval is hereby requested from the HPC to waive the parking require- ment resulting from the proposed expansion of the theatre's net leasable commercial area. As we have discussed, the expansion of the Isis Theatre building is essential to the preservation of the property's existing theatre use. In addition, no practical ability exists to provide the requisite number of parking spaces on-site. As the waiver provision was obviously drafted to encourage the preservation of historic landmarks via expansion exempt from growth management, we believe that it is appropriate for the HPC to waive the parking requirement. Open Space The open space requirement in the CC zone district is twenty-five (25) percent, which the Planning and Zoning Commission may reduce by special review. As the project site contains nine thousand (9,000) square feet of lot area, a minimum of two thousand two hundred and fifty (2,250) square feet of open space is required. As the conceptual development plan depicts approximately four hundred and fifty (450) square feet of open space, special review approval to reduce the project's open space requirement will be requested from the P&Z. This request will be included in the Applicant's GMQS exemption application which will be submitted for review and approval by the P&Z following the receipt of conceptual development plan approval from the HPC. While no formal action with respect to the proposed open space reduction is required from the HPC, the Applicant would appreciate the Commission's support of our P&Z application. We believe that the provision of less than the required amount of open space will be more consistent with the character of surrounding land uses, and is in keeping with the Land Use Code's objective of facilitating the preservation of historic structures via expansion exempt from growth management. In our opinion, the provision of open space in accordance with regulatory requirements would serve no public purpose, as the majority of the existing vacant lot would have to be preserved. As the surrounding streetscape consists primarily of structures which abut the front property line, the retention of a vacant lot between two adjacent multi-story buildings would not appear to be appropriate. .. Ms. Amy Amidon August 1, 1995 Page 3 Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, V~IN ASSOCI~fES 0 Sunn#1ann, AICP ' Sv:CY CC: John Wheeler, Charles Cunniffe Architects c:\bus\city.ltr\ltr28395.aal AUU-08-1995 1 J :33 MUNI<Ut & NEWELL / UCINVCM 0.,10 040 0004 r. 01 .. Denver, Colorado Wl, Colon£]o t T) Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. August 8, 1995 Charles Cunniffe & Associates 520 East Hyman Ave., Suite 301 Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Mr. Jan Derring[on Re: Isis Theater Gentlemen: On August 3, 1995, we made an observation of the existing Isis Theater. The purpose of our observation was to review the existing structure and front, west, and cast masoniy walls with regard to the proposed construction. We feel that the existing front masonry wall and the east masonry wall can be preserved in place when the proposed basement and building is constructed. Similarly the east masonry wall can be preserved to the extent that it will be incorporated into the new building design. Shoring and underpinning the masonry walls can be accomplished while maintaining these existing masonry walls. : If you have any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. . 1 William H. Newe~(P.E. ..7,,4 m LT,%. Principal #UAOW- 1 Eu.-7 #0:4 %.,1 72:feluM€¥' ' ~4~ 156¢I *U j., 761 / t':34 4 W. WILUAM H. NEWELL; rk tY#'.... . 2 -Lit~46 1660 Seventeenth St. . Suite 350 • Denver. Colorado 80202 • (303) 623-4927 . FAX (303)623-6602 TOTAL P.01 .. cr,~~' . A. / . 21*V / inain etreet .\4 4 - \. I\ / ..»Aani 19 4> JEROME VIEW PLANE i = 1 - I. 4 .\. 4, 1 \ L. 7 1 39 1 1 L . 11 ISIS SITE 0 25 50 100 200 273~ + CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ISIS RENOVATION /8 LOTS 1.M & N AlllY BLK 87 ASPEN COLORADO .. A Denver, Colorado Vail, Colorado Monroe & Newell Engineers. Inc. August 2, 1995 Charles Cunniffe Architects 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301 Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Mr. Jan Derrington Re: Isis Theater Gentlemen: We have reviewed the preliminary architectural drawings for the proposed Isis Theater Building. According to the drawings, the basement will extend down 24 feet below the adjacent grade. Since the new basement is below the foundations of the adjacent buildings, shoring and underpinning of the existing footings will be required. We have provided structural engineering services on numerous buildings where the new basement level is below the foundations of the adjacent buildings. This is fairly common in the gambling towns of Central City and Cripple Creek. Usually the adjacent buildings are older structures. Many of them are on the Historical Register. We recommend that the shoring design be provided by a Shoring Contractor/Designer. There are several excellent Shoring Contractors in Colorado that will be capable of providing the shoring for this project. When the shoring is completed a new foundation basement walls and floor system can be designed and constructed to provide a permanent underpinning of the adjacent buildings. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, Monroe & Newell ~gineers, Inc. 11 -RA VLU' I - // ·»'·01 William H. New~ P.E. Principal 1660 Seventeenth St . Suite 350 • I)enver Colorado 80202 . (303) 623-4927 + FAX (30.3)623-6602 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 406 EAST HOPKINS AVE. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 9, 1995, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Houston and 0' Leary requesting Historic Landmark Designation and Conceptual Development Review. The redevelopment proposal includes partial demolition of existing exterior walls, resotration of the front facade, construction of an addition to the east of the existing structure and construction of new living units above the existing structure. The application also requests a waiver of the parking requirements. The property is located at 406 E. Hopkins Ave.; Lots L-N, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/Donnellev Erdman, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on July 22, 1995. City of Aspen Account C 941 ED »i-Li U (X_* n 1 1 1 5 19 9 PUBLIC NOTICE DATEEd YE TIME jI U PLACE:lliC? PURPOSE-97 0 5=itii A- I 5"~r E-'. .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL (Pursuant to Section 6-205.E. of the Land Use Regulations) STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, HEIDI HOUSTON, being or representing an Applicant before the City of Aspen, personally certify that Public Notice of the application for historic designation, HPC conceptual develop- ment plan approval and partial demolition for the Isis Theater was given by 1) posting of notice containing the information required in Section 6-205.E.2., which posting occurred on July 29, 1995, in a conspicuous place on the subject property and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from that date, and 2) mailing Notice of said development application to all property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, which mailing occurred on July 28, 1995. Applicant: ISIS, U_61 ~ ~ 4/9 1/(/ - / /7/ hT@'idi Hbuston The foregoing Affidavit pf Public Notice was acknowledged and signed before me this 1 -"-7 + 1 day of July, 1995, by Heidi ¤, Houston, on behalf of ISIS, LLC. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires : 3 -5 -77 , t 0\,iu jL Ou Pn-j Notati; Public // 4 4 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 406 EAST HOPKINS AVE. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 9, 1995, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Houston and O'Leary requesting Historic Landmark Designation and Conceptual Development Review. The redevelopment proposal includes partial demolition of existing exterior walls, resotration of the front facade, construction of an addition to the east of the existing structure and construction of new living units above the existing structure. The application also requests a waiver of the parking requirements. The property is located at 406 E. Hopkins Ave.; Lots L-N, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/Donnellev Erdman, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on July 22, 1995. City of Aspen Account .. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, 3RD FLOOR Vincent J. Higens ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Christina Davis President 303-925-1766 : 303-925-6527 FAX Vice President 300' OWNER'S LIST Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado, hereby certifies the following list is a current list of property owner's within three hundred feet of LOTS L, M AND N, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, obtained from the most current Pitkin County Assessors Tax Rolls. NAMES AND ADDRESSES TAX SCHEDULE NUMBER PLEASE REFER TO LIST ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF &14«-- AUTHO-IEE~ SIGNATURE F,1 .. 316 E. HOPKINS, INC. 2737-073-29-008 715 W. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 ALH HOLDING COMPANY 2737-073-30-005 435 W. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN ARCADE, LTD. 2737-073-38-008 1148 4TH ST. SANTA MONICA CA 90403 ASPEN ART INVESTMENT, INC. 2737-073-43-009,010 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR. #B ASPEN CO 81611 BANK OF ASPEN 2737-073-29-009 C/O AUTAX, INC. P.O. BOX 2798 LITTLETON CO 80161 CARL R. BERGMAN 2737-073-29-002,003 CATHERINE M. BERGMAN P.O. BOX 1365 ASPEN CO 81612 CBI PROPERTIES, INC. 2737-073-22-014 C/O LOWELL MEYER 517 W. NORTH ST. ASPEN CO 81611 CENTRE OF ASPEN, LLC 2737-073-29-004 ANDREW V. HECHT 601 E. HYMAN AVE. ASPEN CO 81611 CHITWOOD PLAZA CO. 2737-073-30-421,702 C/O THE FLEISHER CO. 200 E. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 DAVID DENSON 2737-073-43-011,012 KATHLEEN DENSON 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL CO 81657 .. .. DUVIKE, INC. 2737-073-39-020 THRU 027 P.O. BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS, INC. 2737-073-43-004 210 SO. MILL ST., STE. 201 ASPEN CO 81611 G.E. BULLOCK CHILDREN'S TRUST 2737-073-40-701 C/O SUZETTE GOODMAN 7601 SCOTT HAMILTON DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 GALENA PLAZA, LLC 2737-073-22-013 C/O LOWELL MEYER 517 W. NORTH ST. ASPEN CO 81611 HARLEY A. BALDWIN II 2737-073-39-001,704 2737-073-46-001 THRU 205 SO. GALENA 009,011,012,014,016 ASPEN CO 81611 HILLAS OF SNOWMASS, INC. 2737-073-43-014 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL CO 81657 HOTEL JEROME ASSOCIATES L.P. 2737-073-21-001 330 E. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 JEAN PIERRE ODIER 2737-073-46-010 P.O. BOX 88 ASPEN CO 81612 KANDYCOM, INC. 2737-073-39-002 P.O. BOX 1135 MAMMOTH LAKE CA 93546 LA COCINA, INC. 2737-073-29-007 P.O. BOX 4010 ASPEN co 81612 .. LEWIS I. SCHAINUCK 2737-073-22-004 MICHELLE T. SCHAINUCK THRU 012 3650 SOUTH STREET STE. 301 LAKEWOOD CA 90712 LINDA H. JEMISON 2737-073-46-013 RICHARD H. JEMISON 1524 CANYON ROAD SANTA FE NM 87501 LOMA ALTA CORPORATION 2737-073-39-010,011 P.O. BOX 8105 DALLAS TX 75205 M & W ASSOCIATES 2737-073-30-009 205 SO. MILL ST. ASPEN CO 81611 MARGARET M. DOLE 2737-073-43-707 C/O FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARIDGE P.O. BOX 8455 ASPEN CO 81612 MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES 2737-073-38-704 205 SO. MILL ST. STE. 301A ASPEN CO 81611 MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES 80B 2737-073-43-706 C/O HILLIS OF SNOWMASS, INC. 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL CO 81657 PETER GOLDSTEIN 2737-073-43-015 ALAN GOLDSTEIN 150 METRO PARK #2 ROCHESTER NY 14623 RANSOM B. WOODS, JR. 2737-073-39-013 JUSTINE F. WOODS P.O. BOX 12288 ASPEN CO 81612 RYANCO PARTNERS 2737-073-30-007 C/O PAT SMITH 715 W. MAIN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 .. I . SABBATININ SPORT, INC. 2737-073-39-014 230 SO. MILL ST. ASPEN CO 81611 WALTER F. HAMPEL, JR. 2737-073-39-008 255 MORTN ST. EXTENSION MARATHON FL 33050 WENDELIN ASSOCIATES 2737-073-43-001,002, 003,005,013 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC 2737-073-39-012 217 SO. GALENA ASPEN CO 81611 WILLIAM W. WHEELER 2737-073-46-015 INGRID J. WHEELER 3241 WEST DRY CREEK RD. HELDSBURG CA 95448 . ir.li. · '.NA.k :. 34.1.:2 '3.77*r,~ ..31 /. 11 ,.. I : 1.¥ , I 4%12 2 ; 0 .# 1 A.CA 914.- 2&2 -ge -2 2- 74'.J /4 1223972 ../ - 44 -31 4-:121 ...1,54. 6 ·,4 9 t . 49:.131 . 24 4.3,4 lar--* 5.-2- h *14-*~ . .4..4 ISIS RENOVATION 4,11 406 EAST HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO .+1 C CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS r 42* * ...1 29. 1. CA 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. * SUITE 301 * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970/925-5590 * FAX: 970/92 5-5076 7 26 a <- J . 4106"Wilitchi//1/113 4% - K. · M f -r . *'94... - P.109 j J'· 9-* f ME*/MAA :%1**fl-n'. A e + CA PAGICTION ROOM D H FC AFFUO~1O4 8-8.45 UL . 4 PROJECTION / ~ ROOM 8 - 1 1 . r 1. PROJEC~ || 10- ROOM C PRaJECTION 556.00 S.F NET ROOM A £ 9 82195 S F NET fa 7 OPEN i . -1 L : 1.-1% + 11 11 0 0- - 14 11 11 *WAP UP (10% SNOW MELTED) TRASH / METERS 1~ TENANT STORAGE ~~ , 1 200 SF 11 4022 S.F MECH EQUIP. 1 1 ki ~ ~~ A IN C 462.8 S F. NET EXIT CORRIDOR U» I m Q 11 11 1 UP . - up -*2244»44 N EXIT CORRIDOR · ~ 1 . *S € k. 4 THEATER 9»: 11 NET LEASABLE 6783.64 S.F FEATER 8 11 _ C 4- d- - 44.... 4/ *te i F v THEATER D ~ F .4444..i E R THEATER A 210 SEATS 110 SEATS Ar- 46. 0».I 300 SEATS 260 SEATS +A 1,726 SQ. FT 2 666 SQ FT 2,022 SQ FT . 444:» 82 1 041 SO FT (4 HANDICAPPED) (4 HANDICAPPED) .46»44 (4 HANDICAPPE[)) (4 HANDICAPPEC)) ~ ' ' «3·.' - :.Ar# - „ ..49 49* 144.2..Al i NET L.EASTAMBEL~B373165 S.F .9 ~ N. - 4. I \ ..·Lit S ©\·Je· 4.-j... ---V .1 --- »rble 4 432« V 1 «. FOX PHOTO ARE HOUSE . TENANT SORAGE D , >&*.....4 1,750 S.F 4 142..... a. 8 M • «i• I I 419&9*1 - ~RkS' « «49§>x . ..~ 64.5 5 · 0 . ~ 9.<244 +4. A En : .»9... 8 1 "2964> 09 44» I -- 1 - ----.- S - - I kdp ' UP ~ Ats..4 ¢2»t:'»/ - 1>4 00 kJ . -1 1 49 \»...<. ~ ~ DN~ 6 '·k~' 441-- ------ -b '.--, 1 LI.r- 17[7 , STOR. VESITBULE n "- | CONC~SSION | -- z 1 1 11 1 1 414*192.2:rpt -7 , I 1 1 1 08 12 1 .Utztttlittt.ttintal-It-4-ti- 1 MEN ( ,] :-14.*ttl-unmil#Ittti- 1 Citfl LC)SBY - ' -·r-- f 4-1 t ·1-1- El-i t_ 1 +T $ e 9 :4 - '-/1/Il --ICKErs V --'111- 1 1,/ti; 1 1,1111,1 111 j 2- 1.Eld: 1 (ilinb-1.- 111 - 1 1 1~------- -1UARGEE | 1 1 1 1 E .NG CA I /7\ /'A b KEY .:ORED *4!WOR·: F -4,0£ (27 7 ¥ ¥ Z rh LOWER LEVEL PLAN ~ GROUND LEVEL PLAN 0 " Na 9521 1 0 " - 10-0. g DATE 8-23-95 6 THEATER NET UEASABLE 428771 S.F. THEATER NET LEASABLE 7405.79 S F 1 SHEET NO TENANT STORAGE 1917.73 S.F. WALLS /CIFIC. /MECH 1796.62 8.F WNIS /CIAC RECH 2948.67 S.F u A2.1 0 2 6 16 0.. i j„£T ( NORTH S133-LIHZ)3¥ 33:!INNAD S3~21¥HD NOI1VAON32I SISI (D'*mnTI:11.1AV 00~1011100 -3 oavwoloo N3dS¥ 3nN3AV SNINdO H 15¥3 90:, r-S~ - I ,7·7'9¢ 9.< ·7Ct,5(01 - fil· 434.k¢- :.2.--«33(Ammfi119(16- 423.1 4.4 . *fi,/ , -,e- . 1 •4- CA :. ' M./.C A~UCATION 3-21-46 . 3.2 1.1.Up 9 : . -a== N tf' | &=„De i BR. BR BR 8-~~ST BR ' F ST ~ I L. -1 ~vA. H. UNIT B A H. UNIT- A I IA 4%*JA Al ,-- f -V V- i 10000 S.F NET ~1~ I~ 1060 0 S.F NET .... »*1- -Mt BA B.R. VOTED ROOF LR L R FLAT ROOF VESTIBULE -, - L'-1 1 11-U-1 1 UNE OF_.44 8£9#_ --- ---- _al /71 ™L, -1 1 $ 1 ~ 4 --1-4-1-4 0 - -1,--1 t H 1 , 1 A f | ~ l.-1- f--1-~ 11.1 1 1 It 111 .i FLOWER BOX ROOF; ROOF BELOW 1 -=Ir=-- l.=Ell . 1 1 1 1- cO 0 154 5 3 1 1 B.R 1 1 BR -fi 4.8 6/ , DECK _ -- 1 STO RID ROOF 1 1 8<100 1 A 01 1 EL r 1 - IrT 1 I 1 1 ICL~ 1 .1 i__1 1- VAULTED ROOF + ..44+41 1 ~ FREE MARKET UNIT ~ tT- , I k 1 t MBA 19°°·osf.NET 1 1 FLAT ROOF - f Ja L H. I l - nu I 1-+ ft-1-01- 1 ttppattt-9 1 1.4-1-1-.Lul 1 ~ FLAT CANOPY r- fa 1 1 1 1 PA71O 1 ~ DECK BELOM 11 i ' - FLOWER BOX , i Z ROOF || ROOF BELOW ~ 1 ill m 11 1 , 11 101 11 1 , 1 1 1 rr. /7'A \9 \My ¥ V t= 2 DRAWING ~ SECOND LEVEL PLAN ~ ROOF PLAN r 'Ma¥.9 - Z A. H. UNIT A 1080.00 S.F 1 /1 - -_ _-- -_ A H. UNIT B 1080.00 S F 2 ps NO.-9521 - FREE MARKET UNIT 1900.00 S.f ~-- DATE 8-21-95 WALLS,'CIRC 512.90 SF 0 SHEET NO. 1 02 6 16 02 6 16 u A2.2 a.: I SHEET Of ©01/I,OfT Oii.B M.,/R *icil„01 S1O31!HOMV 3=ldINNAD 5312!VHZ) NOI1VAONEIN SISI 9£05--SZWN 1(¥6 . 065§-iZ~0€ 7131 . 11919 00 'NidS¥ . 10€ 11!r)5 . -MV ~WAH 15¥3 06 Ze >10018 *311¥ £956-gU/toE:1(¥1 . WELE-,U/EOE:mt . SE,10 00'*NNOT'111.14¥ 00VIO,00 1 OZI Oan!0103 NEIdSV 'inNBAV SNI)WOH -LS¥3 904 1 r 49 9 ':941 44-2 - 24...L .4- ·3. * .*lf-I. ye' '73· m -r: ...1 4/2/1 1 ' ¢/4 4 0 1 •J 2 ' 0 4'Ch , 42 1 - 0*-:iloiloic- :4:C-1-1-4-t4'174--ri,·11$0,--1- 0 0 - ji 1 -3&81411 -i-i - 1-~- r ill#f~- P°°OC- .1 - - O . co 9 -94}491. - - ~I m * I - •406 1- -•4•1416.} .. 1 C 1[lilli 11.11 .111,1 1 1¢1#1. 1,0041..1 Im - h .m .- 44*00 ,at 2=52* C) Ail~ · ~ - - f - ·,·i - O :11, -U . 11,1 111111-0 rl:~ z 4 414443 %1.2/31 1.- 1 9.--- . 11 :lit 1-4-7 E 1 - ...1 011 -11 t I lit . 9&14,11&1 -- --- ..2-4 --- . - - *66, -r- ;I'l'' '14# t " . ti R - 1 =11 1 INWO#44 . 12 -L 4 '1'H I '1@ ' 2/. - 01.1 I'; 24/. 116 - lili 1 1 ¥~ - lili= , 1 ... - -:811 1 --14 _-4 1-/9---·-- -44 - -- ·· j -L-- 02- im-~a i./2 ··· 4 . 1 it - - I '.I= R 14» :/./1,# 4&1 11 - 1 11 1.-1 .Dil.Ubu~~211= Flt . 14 - ·til z - 01 %18 . t.i -------- 4 . I 99, t. Dit E E, . 4------ f - ------- 1 -7 9*2:*414. 1L r H i . 640 ... i ' f#-I- ----- 1 ./ lie>1%11"mi"*F ·lt!-12.:=19 0 V :9* .1 I /314 10 '1110*8208,4,42-1.1 -*17-JE ~-2- .1 1 -X.....:W-- €441 1 - *.- .-*.- Il .. ' .- ..te , 1.,1-101 4, 7%4 ---"--- r, 94.0 R'.C.- 4 g 45 11,- H.P.C. APPUCATION EXHIBIT I 1 ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS i * 44 1 225 m -1,1 - :1 1 ... 1 1, 0 1 LOTS LM, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 FAST Hm- AVE. * SUm ]01 ' ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE. 303425-5590 ' FAX: 303925-5076 11 1 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. (U£*ACK) AVE ' TELLURIX CO 0,435 ' TELE 301728-3738 ' FAX: 30¥728-9567 J SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION 16 00]'1'1'1'1'14 ; V N0I1VA313 1SV3 1[link-j ISIS I EATER '. ~' I 11. ·*0l .. 6/es,a . 4- VI .1 ./ .0. 0 2€%· *hivt< W,17 I 9231 g B Z . m · i 50-·•a, vot: m '444 f ir'- -0 ..51 i 0 ----- r: '. G < 4.2* 9/~&#&9~~/~#~T-1 I'·:'7 4,3, dE 18[i -38888881-OOOOO888ER--• -4----1/ . lilli ... n.--1-3 -:. I.Ipl.--7 m 0 0 -- -4-\\ fo C E I Z I J 2/ -- ----_---.-_-_- - -_ ---=~-- - - 11 /6 1 , -- t-1\ -- CD ZO ------ ------- C) r---- m './.:".Bel 'Of.''f'tft,f'ititio 4*. ·,1,1 ' t ' t:-•. I f- --- -- 1-- -r-- ---- -- I 4 - ... . . . - s 291 e e -1 - - - - - - - - - - 24 1 --4--- 6 -9,9,433'.42,4..ff /42,1 -t +_ --- --4--- 1-lk - Z 1 1 _ ---0 -- .--_ - ---1 Z 41. 443/ Elit <29 -rt--51»» 4 i --- 1..7, >4>filf .)43*. 6 3 kz* Ilittli---:X --22.4 -.--3-«-- 1 i -El VT'.#1/''il I. '//1 -H - 1, IE' 9.-tri 435 L .-q-~li-Ij --r- ST ''i:J'?lt/,1.4, ff iii 11-4 9, 1111111 lilli .4 .. ./ ....9 U! 111~ -4+111 - -in lilli .4661 411 i;445722%; 6 1':-, '72 -,611111 6/9,"..6-1-4- -- ~ 1 it 5 92/434#... 11 945442. ·/:ill· 4~r -1- ---- + % i 42 %6.-1-PI~£5*r-~----- -rE- 2 = 2551 q -- --61 nk---r-7.-FaI- im2%~rap p t ----4 &*,:. 4 i Li i t--0--9* 5--~--__ ·to fe. :,% 99 --1 1 .te, 161.,1, -4 1 1- 1- -g--5 -=29= 1 r.-7 -- 6 E- , F· 1 -), .4-4,"L/--15&9 1-1~ - Ill .-4 ~6}- F *' rl - - )1 3 [f -li!tl-9. 2-«~ 1 -- 1 * 'tr 1,1,1 - -4 - --- fi=Ei. K ! 323 1,3 *:41¢4 1 '....1 1 - litk '11 ··HH-_12:; -a- -- ------- l -litifilf--1 -42%11--21,-332~ --- 32·24:~ '19 7 r. . r i I Ii'1-10+H-i-~- =-==9--1.~Ad=.- _._..... . .y:Ar 0 111 'tut U.4- 1 2 =L,-4- -+I€-T-r--1 - L _ -1 1 -PH-K H I ..' .'I = ...-Ill.. -- ./Al.I' / -=- 1 1 f >· 2.:b : I .4.9 144 j --- 44· ~ 7 -:,9 1.1 . .9 2/ 5 7 -' il ly . 4 MMI %3 311 I*JIqi. ..f, H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I 5'~ /SIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1001 CA) o ./- 3 LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYM,N AVE. ' SLEE 301 • AWEN, CO 81611 ' mi: 303425-5590 ' FAX. 301,25-5076 ip 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLO«ADO AVE ' TELLU~DE. CO m435 ' TELE: 30,728-3738 • FAL 30,728-9567 - 9 , ''/.' Jad*&98' *y-- ap:£2..# 0,44£4*01651*ti.·aa*:1~*: *:. ai..32-22*. ./U/£ 40 . ,/fu 81:691*lilill'Wibwit/' VU.4/'I'RI/1/4/5-- £956-•UiDE :XY:I . BELE--02440€ :3131 . 5E•W 03 11001111 . -D¥ Oanr)100 '3 02 0090100 N3dSV'3nN3AV SNINdOH .LS¥3 90• ~ 9409-526€OE *Vi . 0655-5~0[ :3111 . U,10 00 WidS¥ . IOE *UnS . 3AV IVVYWIl 15¥3 OES ZG )IDC)19 Aill¥ 'N 9 Wl 5101 &81 Im mil :001 F §1331#433¥ 333!NNAD 53121¥HD NOIJLVAONBM SISI E 443 E 91! I lIEIIHXII NOI.I.VOndd¥ Od H .6 ImpALW . 3 2 - imil - -----------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44 2 0 - 1 1 1 1 . f---- 1 1 1 1 1 :; ' 1 W>· e I.''· 1 $.1 w~ EUM,IMMW~,Wk' 16.0 · - 4419. 111,4,;1~ 1 1 ler, I 4{4,1 EMIRHi„80 1 1 - ··MM... .41 I 4®Ufliti== 1 - 1 It 1 1 t 81888*18988*IM 1 1 1: 1- 1 W 1 14 1 ). 1 1 I -Kiou[##tilootiyt.1 0 L--- .. L 1.¢IN 14 f 1 24.· I 1 B f it N 04.': ...€.a.1 2. 1 . 6 1 F q i,====4 .A. 1 I f 6.2 4 , 0 · !~ i 4, 4 1/ W .1 *- ./ V: 1 . + <.. i.; - 1 G. t f - / t.' 1 8 4 1- r.* 0 61+ k.· 21 CD rn , .. L< · 0 1 7.4% I I il 1 J . 1% 1 6 h'.7. : .. i 4 .:3 - , Z - ir 15 ·· O 5 . ..1, IF A e 4 1 K 29 ¥ :,....44... 05 - r k V CD $ "47•. I. I " 1 CO . b. 4%, f,4. ;ttv.~- ~- Z · , ··~ ·~~ . 1 - E----7 ..,0 ... r. I U . 61 / 7.2/ L , - t=-~4.~-- f ~~ ~ ~ ~~r~~ ™ ,(4 '45' E .... 1 .O .. 1 1 -1 4 1 E *· 0 0.: r - p ' · ..K:»'...~.It.a.><17 , , b 0 .:2% LiA? I. ~#:~. I #A.F., ;ft,1 A.M mrNING :ya 66*1 7..-*X 17'94 4/32 '16- r . • .A,f :I.- NOI103S DNIallne 419 . ida -- 0 f 1 ~«01 9 L 'n ..:24,~ :,.* . a.% R .... ~ : it& I ...Ze. 1 4*44 - I <Pa 44 7, . C) ..iwk,4... t. 5 VIP./. . TWAV 1 B *33 6 ' i·/ ./ L & 94 4 » ..E'. :.. ..1 I I III 4- « . 4 .: t' ~2¥41 T I her,%/ 4,1 - 1 r.* - J.12€ ~54 2.2.t:-4.4."1 1 I »02. *.Wi< 45.-* 02' -:t. -f-1-- - . , '... 1, ....... ..1,440 b .. 11 c 047 ki~1 /"/1 Ll t> 1 - 27; 4 0 I f~* Ll_1 . U. [ ELLL] . Fe /» f' H.P.C. APPUCATION EXHIBIT 1 1 1 1, 34 11 ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCH/TEC75 R ill M i jR k) 1 U.' 1 1, 1 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 L COLORADO AVE * TELLURO, CO 81435 ' TTLE: 30,728-3738 0 FAX: 303728-9567 i 1 ~ LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 EG HYMAN AVE. • Am 301 ' ASPEN, 00 8,611 * TELE: 30*5-55,0 • FAX: 301425-6076 : 1.-al 'r, FIRE STATION BUILDING SECTION STORAGE ...r ",-'.6 9-4 E79· u-·4· ROCK BALASTED EPDM ROOF OVER- I SHEET ME~HING : r. f'.t-·· .7 TYP. ROOF AND FACIA CON crtoN,~~4~ EPOW, TAPERD INSULAT/ON, < ./. A z '. SEE WALL SECTION # 1 AND 3/4- PLYWOOD DECK -c P . BUILT-UP WOOD OR STAMPED METAL PATTERNED FACIA V -lwflflt/flflft 51 „~ 7<- ~ 'r 12?,flfl\2\2St\25?52\1 CA TJI JOISTS WITH N- WATER RESISTANT G.W.8. - R-30 BAN INSULATION SYNTHETIC STUCCO OVER ~ ' 2 HOUR WALL 1/ -.- - INSULATION BOARD SIDING STUCCO FINISH - 2 FIRE CODE G.W.B.y - CLAD WOOD MINDOWS -_4 NEW NEW BRICK VENEER - / R- 11 RIGID INSULATION f =4 - t-- 1 1/2" FURRING W/ APARTMENT C STUD WALL WITH-, CONSTRUCTION APARTMGNT R- 19 BATT INSULAT/ON ~ /--PRESERVE/RESTORE SHEET METAL CAP FLASHING C.M. U. WALL W/ \ U STAMPED CONCRETE OR BRICKn 65447. MT-LO9 11 HISTORIC BRCK AND LOOSE FILL INSULATION CONCRETE SLAB WITH-- im PAVERS OVER EPDM ROOF, \ 9 PLANTER SANDSTONE FACADE ~ TAPERED INSULATION, CONCRETE \ M e IN-FLOOR HYDRONIC HEAT OVER ~ a BOX ~|2 SLAB, AND CORRIGATED METAL PAN ~ 6. CORRIGATED METAL PAN \~ ROOF - /.- CONCRETE SLAB OVER U ··41 5/-3 -25/SAZZJAMZSMnr,mnnmnmnn, -_ innmnnmnnmnl*=1 CORRIGATED METAL PAN IRA 6. T.1\ JOISTS WITH- · « R- 19 BATT INSULATION /1/\ B? 0 XUII.C )< urp:-20~ 2%=aB f. - irnmnarnnmt WEB STEEL GIRDER U El \ \ L STEEL BEAMS AND BAR JOISTS t.- A: /- PRESERVE/RESTORE vt • / HISTORIC WOOD WINDOWS - ~~~~ R- 30 84 TT INSULA TION - DROP CIELING - 4- FIRE CODE G.W.B. 1 1 1 .* 4 UPPER - t b U 21= 4 il Q: ISIS 3 12 THEATER - E r- PRESERVE EXISTING BRICK WALL LOBBY EP - -/ i FOX PHOTO - = -- GROUND _ 4 = 4" BR}CK FACE ON 6" C.M.U. - - - ISIS - PRESERVE/RESTORE - - = THEATER / HISTOR#C KICKPLATES 6.44 = GROUND = /-CONCRETE SLAB OVER k CONCRETE SLAB OVER - SIDEWALK A Z CORRIGATED METAL PAN e CORRIGATED METAL PAN -- - 44 BAR JOIST .- h\ -u-nnman r.1 Cinn '~~,~ f ,nnnmnmnnr,n'-r-11 GIRDER ===126--- .- EXISTING ESTORE / MASONRY FOUNDATIOIv- ~ ~ DROP CIELING / 9-- 04 BASEMENT .1.1 % PLENUM DROP CEILING- \\. r 17 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 1 . . - - /- CONCRETE AND IMBEDED / STEEL COLUMN UNDERPINING . BASEMENT ~, 6' 1, 17 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL --< , 1 M- /26 -;Ip · \ \ . 1 Z VALL SECTIONS E.DRAWLNG: REST ROOM - ' " w .. CONCRETE UNDERPINING- ~· Z 1 T CONCRETE AND IMBEDED STEEL COLUMN UNDERPINING .2/ 9~JOB NO. 9418 E-18-9-95 .V k. : I . 0 CONCRETE WAVER OVER RIGID- ; 2 SHEET NO. . INSULATION. VAPOR BARRIER, AND GRAVEL ~ . r CONCRETE SLAB OVER RIGID O . ~ INSULATION, VAPOR BARRIER, 0 AND GRAVE-L ' 4 CANT/LEVERED REINFORCED- d CONCRETE FOOTING - CONCRETE FOOTING WALL SECTION #1 -4... ... . T 64 WALL SECTION #2 = -illil-8/.~li -- CANDLEVERED REINFORCED 0.: 0,2~)::~% r:.::~i:5~ 711:t~ ·,12. 1. )10018 AHTIV 'N 4 ' ' 0(IVHO'I~) N:ildS¥ 03[ANGIAV SNI~cI~)I~i~Vl 90, ~ D u. gli t~N· ·MO,6,-Bl'il i ' ' ... CA H.FC NIUCAIK]N 813 95 . r. r . 1 1 01 9 1 ~ 3.- C ir:' c X =Ci -t--*.I.. 0~--~... B SCREEN 6*. 9 11 A J 1 1-7 3E LU J I il, h. -- 0 d' - L-- , i i r- - %4 1, 1 1 f . 11 1 11 1 1 , 2 -- . - 41 D 11 LL 11 1 1 :, 1 U . 1 '1 . Z /4 0 8 2 1 1/ SHOP 1 0 b U i 4 FIRE ST-#JON 11 , $ 1 1 11 1.14 1--0.4 ] 1- 11 0, FOX PHOTO 1 1 1 F It_ 0 ' SEATING AREA ' 1 STOR. || .--Ill-- 1 11 1 11 It , Z 11 1 1 , 11 1 ! /1 - 0 84TH - · , - 11 1 11 1 1 I '1 50?AGE 1 h + WORK HOONI ! 1 If 9======. c 1 , 4 2.E:EFEE:24 - - I.- - -le 1 1 ,-0 - It 1 ---- 0 '' --=3=--9- ~---7-------7---7--ll ~j------ SHOP ' -- -- 0 . : U ..1 U U L--te L. 4 111 t.==Ce. <r # 11 CONCESWON STAND ~ / 1 4 /kj 0,8/ 2 -.i I 1 UL- --- ------ 6- I - 2 2 ' 0 9. 1-2< , i LOBEW ARIA _ 2 _*. > 14'R. r 1%31 ion/ --a al'... . f a 0 A l'Ga 0 - 1- "/ A n - e DRAWING I DEMOUTION & X MOBiLEATiON ifigi 1.6.1 /IN LOWER LEVEL DEMOLITION & MOBIUZATION PLAN Z ~ ~~9 9521 LEGEND GENERAL NOTES: ~- DATE 5-9-95 ~~ STRUCTURE TO REWAIN IN PUCE WITH TEWOPRARY ~ 6' HGH SCREENED CHAW-UNK FENCE 6 BRACING AND SHORING DURING CONSTRUCTION AW I Ai ' I ~ E HIGH SCREENED CHAIN-UNK GATE J SHI IT NO ~--~ STRUCTURE TO BE DEWOUSHED AND REAKMED FFUW SITE. FOR OELNEm TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT BRICKS FROW EXISTWIG SIDE WALL TO BE SALVEED FOR POSSIBLE REUSE m RESTORATION OF HISTORIC FACADE. ALSO METAL ~ STAGING Y#?0 IN EXISTIMP VACANT LOT < 01 6- SONG FROW KLEY. ~ E WIDE SCREENED AND CO/FERED TEWPORARY PEDESTRIAN ,~ WAL.le,Ar IN STREET TO WEET CfTY STANDARDS. ~ REMO/ABLE BARRICADES •S NEEDED SHEET 01 i (Ir-- O'AM ID. -,CICM ·XV:I . Wal CLi01 1[il . fUL@ 03 301}10 Tl . 3AV oano-1(3'3 OZZ O(1¥30100 N3dSV'~N3AV 7%~72~473 904 Ot '3131 . LL918 00 'NadS¥ . :0€ 95· 114 $.¥A4 15¥3 025 Zg )0018 *3 ' ' NO!1VAONBM SISI .- I 2 44., J 6 -- 7.- -Il ..4. ..r: .... . f.- , ·- ...'14 CA . H.PfAMICAnON D B ·16 It 11 It : 11 11 11 1 1 . 1 1 11 9. 11 1 1 11 '. It 11 . 11 11 1 1 1 1 / L .L / E '11 Ir-,1 1 -4 U i \ ii - AUg- NIEA I 1 1 11 -1 11 LILI -1 11 -1 t 1 - 1 -- li % 1 1 . 1 1 L. fri//2--k<--It b ·r-1 ----ir' U e M 17----1, 4. 1 1 C ~DRODU :-t~ KNCHEN ~| 1 '1 5 2 -r- 0 1-3 11 % 3 5 : 11 0 : EXISTING ROOF TO - --~- ~ BE RE#ED 7 M * t 41 III,BATH,~ £*A.G .MA , 11 jw 4 It 4--17 Il r ---N ' , ~ FOYER -/1 2% &=, .td 2 23 3 1 0=12= . [=1=- 1 - BEDROOA¢ 1 & % c '1-- C--/ i OAW . 1 0 4 :61 fL,-=tIiA=AL 34=== i 1-7°[r 7 -\ 1.54 Sat. -¢' ri f) STORAGE Z •8 0 Li 1-1 1-1 1 OFFEE ' || r 12 1 11 OFFIE I ~ A FL~___~~~:=1 O k- -'E I 4 /~\ DEMOLITION ROOF PLAN /-1 UPPER LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN ~ 01*gmANMAN @ 0.8.*vg L.17 LE) Z ~ KN Na 9371 LEGEND ~ 11411 5-945 ~=~ 57-RLETURE TO REA~4 0 PLACE W,TH TEURARy 6 BRACING AND SHORING DURING CONSTAUCTION ~Ir~~ STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOUSHED AND RENO/ED FROW SITE. ~ SHI 1 1 NO. BRICKS FRON EXISTING SIDE WALL TO BE SALVAGED FOR POSSIBLE REUSE IN RESTORAI©N OF HLSTORIC FIADE. ALSO METAL < SIDING FROM DUB . u 02 I SHar or 1 .i 4 It' L ·t.4 ·. 9£05*Z,UE M. 0665-50~E0E :1131 . 1,916 O)'NESY. 4 Z 9 >IDC)19 A311V 195611/[CE ·XV:i . VELE-VUTOE 3111 . i[,l@ 03 3C]IW11 00¥30100 N3dS¥'3ONBAV SNINdOH NO!1VAONER! SISI ·~vt , ./~A,;Kt- .: '1~8 .'.8. ..... ke= ' 39'i< 9:2*·41 F'*=w 1 - , . - 1 - 11 1 -0-- * - -"----- O ELLE \ \... - . N: .]OF DRAIN 3 / LADDER 1 1 - \EXHAET // FLLE FWE FLUE n n \ 1 4 :,h i -4 1 U 1-- 1 4 1-2 I. 4 9 c 1-" ~ . ~r~- 2 J 0 :14 'e N;r ~ 5 - -- Z h [_1 ~~ "F~,4 ~ ?-4 1 '.3, Fi-14 i Pfat I lid 1 r----------9 1 1 3 ri Ce, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ./0 1 1 , 1 1 6 - 1 1 I cil A==1 ' j 3 i 6 Em i L-_- . 0 49 1 > ~ ~~ ~ ~ r-1 r-1 r-1 rl T 9 4,11 4 / 341 13 --.---- 1 1 i ' r--7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 11 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1----1 1 1 - 1-_. 1/ + #' -0 1 - - fil . 'r 7. e i 4 - 1,47 ~~ /SIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUN/V/FFE ARCH/TEC75 9 -1 i LOTS LM, & N, AUEY BLOCK 87 9 EAST -- AVE • SUnl 301' A-4 00 0191 • TBE= 31»92Mmo * FAX: 30*54076 ~ 434 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 L OOLDEADO AVE ' TEUL~E, 00 11435 0 TELE: NE,720-3731 0 FAX: 30,7264567 t.i ·f~~2.-4&2:14"a/2,2 -, 1* 6 ./.~a~/LED/419///~., u"-'-: 4,k~"H""I"'01~='~~u~"""Di~'~""'I'I"7'~"=<"""' NV1d 13 -NU .-:C~ 0-4 .. e CA -m m. 9 fry*:45,1. LI H,£,m.ANON 82145 =#Gk,whi-661:06,1.Bailligiggene&8*dighiRL L~-1 RE VE_LE W 'a=, PE. ' 44**44%4*4#*4*4·74,4, 11,1,11116'11,11'11'1~11111'1mde- Pitri : IIi [[Il --- I --- - 4-~1-:~1112.-, , -L' '4"-"'T.#~,Z-1-11{~~~~~~i~ ..EZ«: 1-r-T--r-1--r-1 - 15 } 1 -11022!L 1 1. 1 1-1 1 1 /2 1 Ch EAST ELEVATION rh SOUTH ELEVATION R 54 .1. 2 92 L./ 96" - '-0" EN y . 8m 1 1 (-7 I .- UD \ r - \ 4. I \/ 1~93#1164,-~ .4 .« Crv... ~ - 1.; ACUACENT BU.in t. v. I. I ./ I. I ® NORTH ELEVATION 96.-r-0• !4," - 1-0. ® WEST ELEVATION 9 , P .4 - ..r -1 13 rf - PllamcnoN - ROOM 0 0 1-1 / -000 . 152 , STOIUME CO DRAWING SEATNG AIEA STMJE SEATIG AFEA 3 17 4 , ST ~WE STORAGE 1 ff Z L' E " NO. 9521 _- )- DAIT 5-9-95 6 J 911.1 No. fl BUILDING SECTION < a. 151 < E2 4-/ 2 - 1-V 0.: I 9.u Or 1. 1 S1331IHOMV 333INNAD 9312!VHZ) NO!1VAONBM SISI Ze >I)Ole *31-ry 'N ¥ Wl &101 O(1,1,0-103 NEIdS¥ '3nNaA¥ SNI>IdOH 15¥3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 \ Susan: I would think he would want a traditional awning. MOTION: Sven moved that HPC approve the Awning for the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory; one foot skirt awning with materials and paint to match; second by Roger. DISCUSSION Melanie: That means he will have lettering on the street side and the courtyard side. I feel this is too much lettering. Sven: I also agree with Melanie that it is an impact. Amy: We usually say one style per building. AMENDED MOTION: Sven amended the motion to approve the submission with the requirement that the signage only be on one projected face of the skirt awning and that the color and lettering style needs to be the same as the other awnings; second by Roger. Passes 4 to 3. Martha, Susan and Linda voted no. Sven, Melanie, Don and Roger voted yes. 406 E. HOPKINS - ISIS - LANDMARK, CONCEPTUAL, PH j Amy: I have listed on the board the conditions that I propose for / approval. We have eliminated two units on the roof and there are story polls up. I feel we still need discussion about architecture on the roof top elements. Charles Cunniffe, architect: The main concerns seem to be the second story addition, the ground floor and facade were OK and everyone as comfortable with that. The second story architecture in terms of massing we were directed to look at something more contemporary in contract with. the existing building. Something that would complement the existing building. The S elevation has a less profile than it had before. The two critical places of public view are in front of the Gap and in front of Eddie Bauers. The renderings show the impact. We feel it is subtle yet it is obvious it is not part of the original building and it is a little : cleaner. The curved roofs were generated by the view plane issue / from the Hotel Jerome. We were able to hold that back by the ~ closet and lowering the plate height. We also raised the front plate height of the units and lowered the back plate heights so the ~ units would get the view toward the mountain. Regarding materials we are probably using a manufactured stone that would be a sandstone product in panels as a way to carry on the stone and the panels would be slightly darker in coloration. Different but subtle. We are retaining the Isis sign and we are saving the metal material in the rear. 4 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 Sunny Vann: We met with the planner and the housing office and it was clear from Dave Tollin, housing head that this could be handled from a staff level because the number of employees generated falls , within the purview of the staff. We were able to asc,ertain that 4 two three bedroom units on top of this project would more than meet ' ''the requirement imposed under us on the growth management. We feel the P&Z will recommend the same. This is all still subject to review and approval by the P&Z and from a formal referral from the Housing office. With respect to the theatres we are continuing to evaluate the layout of the theatres with a theatre consultant and it is possible that the seating will change. We heard what you said about wanting a large theatre. This one is less because we do not carry the seats right up to the foot of the stage and we do not have three or four rows of seats that are questionable from a movie point of view but are functional from an auditorium point of view. We will continue to look at those issues. At the last meeting I heard the roof was just too busy. Too muck walkways and too much roof going on. This allows us to pull the two affordable housings units back to the rear of the building. We- have cleaned up the court yards and the space between them. We have pulled back part of the free market unit so that it is all uniform 18 to 20 feet from the front of the facade which will make the east side of the free market unit disappear to the same extent that the west side does. ~ Amy: At the last meeting we supported landmark designation, and HPC approved the parking waivers and the open space reduction. CLARIFICATIONS: Roger: What is the recommended material for the third story south, east and west sides. Charles: Manufactured stone in panels and we c·an make them any size we want. Donnelley: The storage is down below and that makes for the two theatres up above. Previously the free market had a fire place and is there a fire place now? John Wheeler: If there would be a fireplace it would be a gas appliance but currently we are not showing one at all. Jake: One of my big issues is demolition. John Wheeler: We talked with Bill Drueding on how the city views demolition and if it is over 50% they consider it total demolition, only as a code issue. If you demolish half or more of the structure then you have to go through full mitigation. He has )5 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 acknowledged that it isn't total demolition but it is more than 50% and that is where it was left at. Amy: It doesn't have further ramifications for them and that was f what was my concern. , Jake: When I looked at the numbers I saw that what you were adding was more than what the existing building was. How is demolition measured? Amy: FAR is the unit of measure but the only time it matters is a residential demolition. With ord. #1 they are worried about 50% demolition. Jake: How much of the existing FAR are you demolishing? John Wheeler: The exterior wall is what is being retained. Jake: As I look at it I see the retainage of the west wall, north wall and a portion of the east wall. The building itself is being demolished. Charles Cunniffe: It is done all over the country. In order to get theatres downstairs we have to get access to the whole body with machinery to get down and dig it out. In order to do that we have to get rid of the building that is there. We also have to underpin the building. Sunny Vann: Maybe I can clarify the regulatory side of it. When the Gap was reconstructed a full basement and roof was constructed and it was a substantial demolition on the building. The current code as far as the growth management is concerned is if we retain a portion of the building and it is not complete demolition and we raised the site we only have to mitigate the additional stuff for net leasable square footage that is added to the building. From a commercial point of view the only issues in terms of impact are the net leasable square footage, FAR has nothing to do with what we are going to be required to provide in the way of mitigation for our growth management application. In terms of the regulatory side of this we are in compliance. In terms of whether you think there is more demolition that is a separate issue that is not governed by specific regulations in the code. That is a call on your part Jake. Chairman Donnelley Erdman opened the public hearing. Harley Baldwin: I own the building across the street and if any of you remember in restoring the Collins Block there were very strict rules and that was that if there were any additions to the top it could not be seen anywhere through town, not from across the 6 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 / street not from La Cocina not from the Hotel Jerome and that was the rule and I feel we should abide by that rule here. I had to set my addition back 15 feet and push it down ten feet from where I wanted it to be. This building is extremely apparent from the Collins Block, Eddie Bauer and from in front of the Brand Building and half of historic Aspen. It looks like the new building is eating the historic building. · I feel it is much too high and in fact I found I could create a wonderful space on top keeping it out of site. I feel the idea of restoring the theatre is a terrific one. I do not feel there is any reason to have a setback on the side. I feel setbacks on Aspen are terrible.and .-they- are no~ historic'and not helpful: - If he needs FAR let him put it there I have noticed that the number of bathrooms here is ridiculous. It is way too high. The code requires way too many bathrooms. It looks like the new building has teeth on it and it is consuming the historic building, munching its way halfway through the building. You cannot see what we put on the roof from anywhere in town and that should be the standard, Thank you. Donnelley: We are in conceptual and we can take Harley's consideration. The Collins Block did have certain advantages with the parapet, Charles Cunniffe: I do not think we can make the addition go away but we have reduced it and that is due to the fact that each side ~ has lower buildings to it and it will always be visible just by the nature of what goes around it. I would like to see this building taken on its own merit. Sven: I feel this is a much improved design particularly in materials and summation of massing. The building sections on A.4.1 would seem to indicate that perhaps another structure look, the structure that holds up the housing unit floor, it looks like there is plenty of ceiling height in the lobby that could be handled differently. I am wondering if he could compress the roof structure of the theatres and possibly reconsider the ceiling heights of the theatres to further depress the housing units. This is in response to Harley's comments which were valid. Charles: The space there is indicated for mechanical duet work. We are trying to preserve a view. Harley: The standard that it cannot be seen should stay. Les: You building was historically designated and that is the difference here. Harley: It should be designated. Les: We are getting designated with a design control. · 7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 Amy: Harley's property is on the national register and we do have complete design review over this because it is in the commercial core. In terms of the historic landmark they are getting GMQS exemptions out of it. There should not be a big difference here in the review. Donnelley: We need to take into consideration that the ultimate building is going to change the perception of the block. Charles: There were numerous comments but not a consensus so what we did was take those comments that would work and tried to work with all the comments in some way such as moving it in a little. Susan: There is a lot of tenant storage and could not some of that space be used to reduce the height. Charles: We need air exchange and the air exchange has to occur up high. Susan: You couldn't use the basement? Charles: The owners wanted storage as well. We are trying to keep the housing impact off the building as much as we can. \ Roger: Could the duet work be exposed for theatres A and B? Charles: There would be sound problems and vibration transfers. The exposed duet work would have to have insulation worked around it to such an extent that it might not be attractive. We can look at that. Jake: You have created an area in the middle of the roof that is a depressed area and by doing that you pushed the housing to the outside. It seems to me that you would want to concentrate your square footage in the corner and leave areas for setbacks for a more visible size of the structure. I am still concerned about demolition and it seems that you are retaining only 200 sqft. of the historic structure. We aren't saving much of the building. John Wheeler: We are keeping 70% of the exterior fabric of the building and yes the interior of the fabric is being renegotiated. We cannot dispute the interior fabric. I feel you have to look at the exterior of the fabric and what is being preserved to the outside. Charles: We feel the exterior fabric and the theatre use are the most important. Jake: If maintaining the theatre use destroys the building then 8 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 iiff--3 I am perfectly willing to get rid of the theatre. I would rather have the building then the theatre use. What good is it to put in a use that destroys an historical building from an historical preservation point. I feel all possible options for renovation of the structure in its basic form should be explored before we leave that area. Would it be possible to invert the floor plans and in that way you would utilize more of the existing structure than in your present proposal. Charles: This building has an immense egress and to put more people down stairs would requi*re more impact on the building. We feel the main theatre is more historic where it is. There is no way to renovate this structure without demolishing the floor structures. The use that is there now was not the original use. We made the entrance to the building back to where it was historically. It is a ground floor entrance like all the other buildings in town. Sunny Vann: We need to see if more of the fabric of this building needs to be preserved. Amy: I understand what you are saying Jake but every commercial building in town is gutted just like this one is being gutted. We do not deal with interiors. I am not sure this is a significant interior. 7 Sven: I feel this is close to compatibility requirements. This doesn't have the character of Harley's block but I also feel this should go through a stringent view committee. Having the housing a low impact is better. Harley Baldwin: This is one of the top ten buildings in down town and the theatre use is fabulous. I feel the theatres will add life to the downtown. Their parapets are just as tall as mine are. Peter Kuntz, I have worked for the New York City Landmarks Preservation Committee for several years in setting up guidelines for Greenwich Village and one of the things that maintains historic character at a point when it wouldn't last any longer is that when you do a structure on the roof like this the shape, fenestration those elements announce that it was not part of the original structure. Maintaining the original material, brick or whatever the volume was of the actual building stone, maintained and did not swallow the building. The other thing that we found of vital importance was not breaking up the city scape itself. In this case it wouldn't matter if the addition were a glass and steel structure again in proportions that were compatible to the building next door itself but it is bringing it out to the streetlor only having a minor setback that maintained both the historic character of the building because it is part of the urban environment. You do not 9 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 f want to create dark gloomy spaces on the street. I do not know if pulling the addition building forward would allow more space on the roof. Charles: We wanted to take a little bit of the corner and have just enough gesture to make the addition read as a separate entity. We did not want the entrance precieved as an entrance to a commercial business as it is the entrance to the housing. There is a little planting/plaza there to set it back from the facade and it becomes a stage set for the theatre. Peter Kuntz: That was what we found was wrong. By making it a stage set you destroy the point of the stage set to begin with because you have lost the urban experience. It wasn't the corner of the building it was the overall feel. The city itself is an historic preservation feeling and is maintained by the character and quality of the street itself. Chairman Donnelley Erdman closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Les: I wish we had different zoning requirements when we did the Collins Block Bldg. I feel wh have learned a lot since we have done your building. We are not loosing any of the original \ building and we are getting the facade back to as close to the original as we can get. I feel there is community support for some compromise here and retaining the theatre is great. I would like to see a further restudy of the ducting if possible. The Fire Dept. will be gone and probably another huge building will be put in. Conceptual works for me. If you bring the parapets up then you loose the historical facade on the original building. Susan: Is it possible to put the stairway vestibule between the two units on either side? Charles: We wouldn't have the square footage. Susan: Possibly if they were narrower stairs. Charles: I believe this is the best solution. Roger: The demolition plan has been submitted and if it is an acceptable plan to staff then it is acceptable to me. The concept of demolition that you are proposing on the building since we do not deal with interiors and use of interiors is certainly acceptable. The contemporary history of the building is a theatre and if we were strict preservationists and we dealt with the interior that would be tossed out in the community. We would say that you have to restore the building to what it was originally and 10 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 . if you can squeeze a theatre in fine. That is not what I want to see happen. I probably can not vote for conceptual as I feel we need a continued study of the roof top placement but I feel we are close. If we view this from the street the south west corner is the most dominant. The portion on the other corner due to the addition is not as conflicting to me; however, I feel the mass on the roof can be moved around. I would like more study of materials and I am not sure stone is an appropriate material on the third floor. I myself would prefer brick, a new brick and a different color and sheen. Even a rusted metal could have been used because that was what was on the back of the building. Continuing on with materials the new addition to the right which is inset has some sandstone lines on it which are trying to pick up those of the original building, I prefer th*t those be removed and that the new addition be simplified more and that if in fact those lines are necessary that they be done in brick not another element to pull out the historic structure. Retain the Isis sign is a great idea. Metal on the rear needs to be studied and keeping the back simple is appropriate. Submit specks for masonry repair is very important particularly on the corner where the piece is going back. Waive Ord. #30 and we have dealt with the issues of housing. In relations to Harley's comments the building to the west could be built out and raised higher and that might happen and the fire station could be sold and maxed out and that might happen. If that were to happen I would demand that an entrance be in the little 3 patio which would then create a sense of messy vitality and would / be terrific. Donnelley: As Roger said the new addition rather the tower portion has not been restudied since the last time and there were recommendations made and they were not taken into consideration. I have a great deal of trouble with the roof configuration. The south east corner of the free market unit virtually will never be hidden and will always encroach visually. I would recommend even if we give conceptual approval that the free market unit be turned 90 degrees and somehow pulled back a significant amount in the neighborhood of eight to ten feet in both east and west corners. The AH component is as far enough back so that it will never be effected by the site lines but the free market unit will effect the site lines tremendously for a long period of time and I do not find it acceptable in that southeast corner. That is the main issue for me. I am recommending a restudy in plan of the southeast corner. I also find the tower watered down historism and it has crept into the city very heavily and I would like to discourage that. Charles: We did look at leaving the bands off but it left something to be desired. Sunny: If we go forward with conceptual that is to our benefit even if it is with conditions. 11 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 Donnelley: I would suggest that a motion be made with a number of stringent condition and then the applicant can proceed and also deal with these conditions. John Wheeler: The story polls' are placed at three points and you cannot see them from across the street. Chairman Donnelley Erdman entertained a motion. MOTION: Les moved that HPC approve conceptual for 406 E. Hopkins with the following conditions: 1) A study session to address roof top materials, setback on the free market unit and the attempt the additionally lower the roof top units through interior ducting. Motion dies for lack of second. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant conceptual 406 E. Hopkins with the following conditions: 1) A complete restudy of the roof elements as to mass, scale and height and materials. 2) A complete restudy of the tower and new addition as to 3) materials, detailing and being more simplified. A complete package of demolition plans and how the demolition will be carried out. 4) A complete plan of materials to the north alley; second by Melanie. Discussion: Roger: Rooftop means mass scale and height. Jake: I am against the motion because this is a significant building and there is no reason to rush through this. The conditions that are proposed as part of the conceptual are huge and they are the kinds of conditions that need to be dealt with at conceptual prior to moving forward to final. Les: I feel we are very close to being there. Amy: We need the waiver of Ordinance #30. Donnelley: I find asking a restudy of the roof is vague. We need to be explicit. My suggestion was that the € ree market'unit be VI ;,relocated and reconfigure so that it offers a' significant setback *' on three sides, south, east and west.*.LI personally do not have S problem-with the employee units othdr than perhaps in detail, 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 -4-'ith 898:ilii i 4:25/ possibly a stronger break in plane between new and old. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended the motion to scratch complete restudy and add restudy the free market units particularly dealing with the south, east and west elevation and the placement and orientation of the freemarket units. Also to add the waiver of Ordinance #30; second by Melanie. Sven: What about story polls. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended that the story polls be retained or replaced until the board has an opportunity to see them; second by Melanie. Sunny: What about materials. Donnelley: I was talking about using brick and I was talking about using brick specifically on the tower which comes to the ground. Sunny: We are looking for more clarity of whether the materials should be emulation of the original materials or a contemporary material for the solution. Donnelley: That needs to be clarified how the applicant responds to the request to physically move the walls of the free market j units back. If they are moved back there is a definite break in / plane and it would be less visible then it may be appropriate to continue with a brick expression. Sven: The side theatre and tower at a conceptual level I am approving it in volume and stuff but I am still wavering how appropriate that style is. It is not just a question of materials for me. Depending on how the roof is solved I feel that should integrate into how the stair and housing unit is solved and those two should be visually linked and I would include that in conceptual review. Donnelley: The suggestion is that a revision to the massing and location of roof elements may indicate the need to tie the fabric of the roof more closely with the fabric of the tower. Sven: We can't evaluate that until we see the roof solution. Donnelley: Now we have three different things, the old brick of the historic resource, the new of the tower that comes to the ground and a third dealing with the roof. It maybe appropriate to reduce that to two expressions. Roger: I think that is clear to the applicant and does not have to be included in the motion. You might use a brick that is 13 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 different than the historic brick but close. Donnelley: I agree with Sven that in addition to just a material study of the towerlthat it may be wise to incorporate the material of the tower or.'alli?** additions into one kind of fabric for all of the additions to the building. Sven: I want this as part of the checkoff list. Les and Sven didn't vote. VOTE ON MOTION: All in favor of motion and amended motion. Passes 6 to 1. Jake opposed. 525 W. HALLAM - WYCKOFF - FINAL Amy: I am recommending final approval with the recommendations that they get a letter from the structural engineer stating that the shed can be moved. This appears to be feasible. We need to know how and where the shed will be temporarily stored. The applicant needs to post a bond and I am recommending $3,000. or whatever the cost is to move the shed. They want to make this work and get moving. They also do not have their landmark approval yet and the condition would be that if they do not get landmark that the city would use that money to put the shed back. Work with staff and monitor on restoration of historic materials, remove the cresting on the porch of the new addition and finally assign an HPC member to be a monitor. Glenn Rappaport, architect: We lowered the garage into the ground a foot to deal with the height problem. We took Jake's comment about dropping the roof at the point of the new addition on the north L so it would be a better, differentiation. The little metal detail on the roof we don't have a problem with that. The reason we put that there is that we believe there will be a snow problem with the way the snow comes off the main roof. We thought that it would end up breaking the snow and go over the side instead of over the front. The intent would be to make something a little more abstract and we would like to work that out with the monitor as we do think there might be a problem. We have the letter from Mr. Cole the engineer regarding the shed. Regarding the shed there is an overlap of about 1 1/2 feet from the old position and the new position. We would like to dig under there and form the foundation and slide the building over onto the new foundation. That assures us that if we don't get landmark designation we haven't moved the building. Julie would like to discuss the bond amount. CLARIFICATIONS: 14 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Isis Theater- worksession DATE: September 27, 1995 Attached are the minutes (draft) from the conceptual approval of the Isis Theater redevelopment. Please review the discussion and numerous conditions of approval. The main focus of discussion at this point is the rooftop units. A site visit will be conducted on September 27 at noon, to see new story poles. The applicant has altered interior ceiling heights and depressed the roof in order to lower the units. Pending review of story poles, the following options remain in terms of decreasing the visibility of the units: 1. Lower the front plate height of the units (currently it is about 12') 2. Pull the units in from the walls of the Theater even further/ decrease the size of the units. Please note that the stone stringcourses have been removed from the elevator tower and replaced with a soldier course of brick. ' 4,141#~~1-3vrE ~1/,1,0f 104QG~ I . b ./r :€ 43. /fl~~0~) ) 1 H WEBBER 1 , i 1892 1 24 1 1 - 4 1 2 , 1 1 1 1 I· .1 4 1 -i i j 5 1 .1 ; 1.: 1 1 1 1 ili' [1111'11 1. 1 I i lilli .1 1 1 L T 1 '4 1 1 1 1 1 ' 4 1 t.. f , 1. 1 .1. .' 1 1 1 1..1 Xt 1 1 . i i t 1 1 1 1 I !.1 1 1 -1 K I ; 1 _L -1- =L _1_ __L ._12 -1- :ty 1 1 1 1 1 1 1... 1 J l i lilli i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + T F i tt I T 1 1- 4.1 1 .f ., . *» ISIS RENOVATION ~F~ 406 EAST HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO C- CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. * SUITE 301 * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970925-5590 * FAX: 970/925-5076 9-20-95 .' 4. L. 2 ~4324121·¥rrt<20- -. - -w - ~ k " 4 -tjalloN O-81 f f f UR#NWI~ WI I ~1*1---- -3 r_q_ 8 (*3 . 8 R 39 BA ~ fil I ST NE- -4... 1-- L v.1 2 A H. UNIT A , r" ~'h 'PA~|UN~~ J .1.A ~ ff $ 0~' ~ ~ 1-OSF NE[ 1*f -4--ilpitp 10800 S.F. NET -E-V V= P BA PRPR - .9. L.A :t.Tit FLAT ROOF VE6719(JLE I .u--, 0 ---7'I M./. ~- - -1 - 1 rr---~-1 + -rrh=r--- C=r== -1--- 82 , UNE OF WALL BELOW ------- ------------ ---7 NS' -0 /El. till 1 11'11 1.. jit 1 1 ' .4:£, -- /14'+ m, 2- 4-t-·, -4-r '!#,i [ · 1 1 + - L- Ill 1 1 1 5 ? BELOW 1 BR B.A . - 1 1 li ..JI lili 7-1 . > 4 01 I , 7 _,TO v.,C _· ili; filil r.r'/ ·JAJ CLO. . 11... - 1 W LI 1.u.kt¢?Ur . - ~ ... 4, k '1=-7 aM ... <7 V r.=*ki,•w.69-+4„.1.Id. 2 w ' , 4 V L . ROOF DECK -,-,/-----1~1FL01_E ¥ I BELOW' 1 1 -8 / . ./% /. 1 FREE MARKET UNIT E . 1 1 ..Il 1904.5 S F LIFT . 1 1, V VAtA-TED AOOF 1 - i M V . M.BR ~ LR D.R PX I r FIAT ROOF Z 1 1 4.1 .- ....Cr I , R.AT CANOPY · · PATIO ' < ~ if, -* € , / --1.1 ·0 , . :·A.x Kix...9,4 .,v V 1 S VAULTED ROOF · -• - -r V > ti 1 C DECK BELOW ~ . . .\L 7/ . Z . 7 Y 4 /. ' 4 : f. 9 ... I ~ I f I I y . 1 ROOF BELOW . 11 51 11, 11 m 11 , 11 1 i /03\ /-Al /.3\ \5' t= ~-'~ SECOND LEVEL PLAN ~ ROOF PLAN I FLOOR MAI€ DRaNK; I 1 - M 76" - 1'-0" A H UMT A 106000 S F Z A H. UMT 8 1080.00 S.F r* FFEE MARKET UNrr 2000 00 S F 9 108 )4_ WA --- ~-- DATI 0-841 WALLS 'CIPIC 512.90 SF. ~ SHFFT NO 02 6 16 026 16 cj A2.2 40044 I SHLE! oF 1 1 rim-/ 01'* a,0/m -r'"M · i &1331IHOMV 333!NNOD S31>IVHD 29 NIX)18 A311V ' '' £998-ou OCIV»0 1) NldSY'anNEJAY E~NW~d1O~Hl~~ 904 vqt"/8/'M)74'.;" F ..27,1 '-Ill'll .,IT. ls..'... 95~ 589'llamm</MME'ir*r: ;'W '~1. 9 £#- -1/r - ¥ ...4 1.7 .:. G.,i, 1 ' i 0 f f i r , 12241;IM~/iWjR 0 ki 1 - C 1- , C) 30.4 • 11-4 40.4 ''' 4 '. IJ O K .1 m -- InMH m ·44 r < O Vt 1,4401 r-tii#' r 4,-r ! 549 r • •(art~ ; -7777:, l ·01 , 66 .''ll.' ' * I .f M 12- , :L Be /2 1 + 4, 1 ,--L (31 ¢ 0 -- . ~ 1 - . 7.. tri , 1 1 r 1 1.40. ·· --hibiloil Pr„/ i· '·~ . 9 L qo xm- -r - :I /- -7 11 0 1 1 ,.1.4 1/- 1 J.. 6811!54 \ 1 P 1.Ii' %. 1.,1 .... 4 - I . e ... 1 4,9 1 ~~ U -~M•Uut - 11!il.rf,1] ~ : · ~ · :· illilicv„. -1 1. : 4-9 +41 D - ... - 195 -' . ' ' .14: 191·1!1 4 I 1 1·1 1 -- 4C-- -- J I l. I - 2.11 -' .,it.'Int#i- - - CAK h:+ p D 1 f. 2 1- I 5 - I - - -4 - - . 1, I h j ~-73TT I i - - - - - I. A : 1 ,- -4 9 , 4. 71'al 1 4 ™.1 1 - A---- , £ 1 - ./ 7~ .1~,1 .~ 64 ./ %9?'44 * •M '' ' - "" · 10,# bITY·.4'~i , ~, ------... - I $ - * 1 - I I I - # - I. - -.-- - ji: p~UU. Y= t- .. . ·,;WINHR' i , T - ----.- ----- -- - ,)[th: 1 +TS' --- ·· - ....+L 1 - - - -- - - .- - -- . 7/r./1/4 , r . L 57.40- 1 1 ........ A. 10'11.-r !9 -joibki -22 :2 2-Z-3-2 23 2 *f£88' -3 ~flillt, ~1, p."T-4.2.1 -t):r' I ':. 1 8, t i 'f -100960£1110 0Gt£-' '' ~~'~-~'~'~'~~ '~~~~~' ~ _ 21'Ht .a,•an R,J :- I= 1112 11.1 7, to N lilll -·*WB#tfq{:,h.1. .,frt; -r--- -- --------- - --- ---- : 3/FHN) 111;$1141$- . %Mt#. .'1.'·· -99044)11;Vk ·y-r..... 1 . M:Iirmminiint .didWID*U m m@ i * 48 4 CD .1 F.I. CD £ ... .. -1 1 . I /11' p 1 H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I i » 3 %: 13 4 00 - r rn ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS / Q fi :6 7 1 11 LOTS LM, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 90 WT Ha-4 AVE * SlmE 301 0 ASMN 00 01,11 * TELE: 3mn,-1- 0 FAX. 30*923-1176 I I ' 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLO«*00 AVE- 0 7811*101, Cr) 81435 • TELE 30*028-3738 • Fa: 30*726-*567 ....... .t~:1 #-17.N&i·. ¢,3 - -4 04MM -'.»~ .. ,,2,~~.. &' :,, '. -. i ¥ NOI1VA313 1SVEI OUTH ELE TION 131115 £9£61£/EOE :Wi . 9Ettltet{* 3,131 . Sole 00 03(AnTAL . ]AV 00-nO:) 3 OZZ 0(7¥30102) NldS¥'3nN3AV SNDIdOH .LS¥3 90, 64 9/05-€m€OE *1 . 06-5247* nat . 11*9 00 'NUS¥ . lof 111115 . 'MY KMNAH 19¥3 02:S £0 >0010 1311¥ 'N 9 'Wl Slal i 004 4 92 1 22 S.LE)31IHOZIV 3=WINNAD S312IVHD NOUVAONER! SIS! i ./ I lISIHXil NOI.LY)!16!V )d H 1 € , 2 r-rm///9/Ir.///i/ ¥ 4,~.C U-4 - 1~-•1•JY '1•P - - U 1 > u -7 LL- . . I. f Er·:132 ' r..HTF% FC:Nit 41,2=: f« . ' 1. ·141 ' :0 - 7. 4 - -1 ~ 1 32»>:I -- aff 1 @I » 121 f 7111 . 3* - 4%9E~*=F--1, V. t 7 I , f' 11 - 17-it-1' :i. 1 ; :-A I, 'Mi,r -y F: -2 3#5509*58*,5 F i .: /447' 7/19'r,4/, /irlm 1111111 '955/ 4/i.»05/5 pi *,f/,29(fl -90111111 1% /5/ 1'1 1 f t-+ 1, 11 . 29.214»>,04%*%~ 1 --a-.--:2: LITIfINL.,I :LIE IN: r' f 1 __ -.... . 1-*#6---**1 r r 2 32«3~ r 2:-4 aft@l(La~13_«»¥= 0 1 1 ' ' l t f 1 fil 11-l i IK · 14" . 1 7. '1/1 1 11 41-1 1/14/Ni 0 ...16... /://f/ . .#t - 'tik' - --1- I-- L -{ 32.Egi--------I-:-6 -]I 4,«{9-* -1 laidi/ T »T--112 -22.Ir--- A- .h--76--1-- UJ I # 111./ --i - M. O 'N Z 'o - , 4i:~ i di*jE'i~ „14*' a : ,·#il.j:i~jit{* O · · *R·,P}· v:~Wmm*dr 138'mheap /~~45 l.1.1 -' -1,W,!;Ctiatt#00060~~~~11*04010·000L' ... ..1.1 1 1 , 1 1 6 AW.6.14,1-:.1.,~0#8B#it 1 .1- 1 ,. 1 ; d. 0- /1/UK 3 3 5 5 E m W U.1 r*/ on RV':* e CO Z K 2 2 U E r:.1 -t il .Tat 1 1 . r - .., .4 1*,~r , . . 04.- 7 ;.¢04 4. ..4 ...4 .1 i NOI1VA313 1S3M .. , '.*:'T-T'.1-aa'.4//4/<:i'/i""47#4-.YEN /4 4'' ·fee-'~,m~ 4<fAVE·•; p:;I~ 9. i 1/ ~'·1 6. -4%.lk f. ' 44 ./ 1 2 4 .1 1 I *q.. I - I '1 4: 1 ' - 0 %1_ LL 0 -..4 r-- .-' ....,4< 1 4 LE? jh 1 9 k 2 1 . lu / / - 0. :0 I 1 .., i 1 1 -0 WY a m h S m - cn d 5\ 1 1\ it 1 1 4 1 11 1 . t iii I f jILM \ . 1 IVAL. ' A m 0 1 * 0 . -1 O 0 Z Z t ' I g 1 1: 1 f------=-19;2-=~ Fli- ~ RTE * 3 hM,01'.NUIL' Ah 141"t 'HU(KmlktMA.4 .., 2491 b q.*1=14). 1 :519 1 4 P 11* 1 : O -4 1 1 . : ON;NIMF1 4 1:. ' -Mt,U, ...1 -14 , , 11...h. '11 91-' ' 4 -: 4 1 . -0 11. i ~ 4#EL- H . 0-* 1 © r.*I ®~11811}9'17! 4,~?i88 1 1 /1 .1.... . ~ . .- uy # , 1 ' 4. ... ...,1 . 10. 1 - 4**1*El ~ ~ ·~~ · ·······~· - 1 ' ~ i '· Ii;RIi;Ii;iiiiiAii;I;IRNIr.n MOGfl' 1 1 ..1 2 11 1 11 r 1 1 1 1 . F. .* *mi- 1 1 U ...40 - ./ q., r a H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I | : I im R 8 i: ? m %= 1. 8 W ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 2 LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 3211 EAST HYM,N AVE • SUITE lin • WEN, CO 818,1 • TEU- lal*23-6590 • FAX: 301423-176 H 12 4 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 i aXORADO AVE. ' miURIDE, 00 81435 0 TRE· 301728-3738 0 FAX: 30,72,-93,7 I 11-dia" -7 1, 2 rr,/ 4,1.> ,/0/4:0~~i'r r i THEATER C LOBBY PAGECTION 1 '' I .*f LI n . . ., 1 m er 0 4 t -6 1 - N 61 Ur 9 0 m r R IA.I."4:1 1 1 0 m 0 Z m I.· 1..twil= 20 9 ...4 1 0 -0 - 4. f 3 1 000= mEN 2 4 :110/. 9 1.22. 1- 1 -4 00& 21 1,01!C-1, : f I ..mit 2 :-] f r 4 *11. /0 1 1 1 L=:22= 4 4 1 4 Po 43 g 1 4·0*1001,.,.. .f 4 1 I JL I *+I 'C .2- = .it. 1 3 m 7 1 0 . 6:.:b.4 1, DC;*2 ..1% : . 3.2<- 7%.9. r.: ~ ' 1 1-4-4-1 1 . 1 . 1 7414 // -.1 - 1-- l 11 m E H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I | A i 1 9 gi ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1 3 > 2 *181 - *11 2 1 4 moo i Q iu liliat G 1/1 LOTS LM, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYMAN AVE • SUITE JOI • ASPEN, 00 816,1 • TELE: 101925-55910 * FAX 103923-076 6 j r=-~ 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E COLOMDO AVE • TEul,RIDE 00 81435 • TELE: 303/72&-3738 • FAX 303/726-9567 91 9 20 NOI1VA313 H P.C %. ",1. .. /1. i/3 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS November 2,1995 Ms. Amy Amidon Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Amy After the HPC work session on September 27, 1995, we have refined the design of the Isis project in response to the comments of the Board members. We are prepared to present the revised design at the HPC meeting on November 7, 1995. A copy of the rendering is enclosed for your review and use. Please contact me if I can answer any questions you may have. Sincerelv. LL.._-- J ul 11 1 U. vv„celer AIA Enclosure CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS · 520 EAST HYMAN · SUITE 301 · ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 · 970/925-5590 FAX 970/925-5076 . 't Y I .. 1 4 ' - . 44 i , 1 . . 1.3 ....., . - elli..........lilli 1~91*a:- 1-,t=* $ 12044 =*=.'bU &-I .-72=4»* -24101*51, I>4411&4,5'7, ';5 ta, r.,j-*l g 74 -- - - .7 72ZE*»P '«-¥ iU:¥13,8.#,fLLL'LA~2.~- - 779%7263---. r.1 . - . 7.6..7- - il: --244#,MY 1*42*~ . * . I - .- - D ..... 9/JI~./Trif~...S -- '73630=7777=- 7,5- mililiRkt- 4 - - I. , ..8i........... -- 'i,4 fqiff -1*1,1-- -24 »ah, e= 15 .- .,tr-3,_-- *Eil=*Pw:--~=6764:11/34/*2 .*€ 4. -U--L ---1....~1 1 ,#.JifY . a. 36:.t 1 - 0 . -11-/*-+--• 42 -.JMM.2• i.>11;15!4'/Hipp..Ill.f=WI'Imilkill/*~ 4 I . - Utic 1. 4- .la Ii-'...Ill-.I -- 2. .4-* 9.9=2 i. fl a */11 ~f f'*sU.tiU/&*6:~~~~~**~~0 . r. 'A I'*' USE; tip. - ....hk,61. 1 2,*7 EM,Wat k ~~ Nt,N-4-.1-44:LA» -4 4 79' .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 have to make it an ADU and as a conditional use P&Z will probably require one parking space for that which means we will be required to have three parking spaces and we can only get two in the garage so we would also request a parking space for the ADU. Amy: If they choose to resolve their volume issue with an FAR bonus then you should probably say now if HPC is willing to grant the 500 sqft. bonus. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended his motion to add a parking space variance for the possible placement of an ADU unit in the basement; second by Les. Les: I don't consider these little mining shacks boring or ugly and I personally love them. They are the essence of what the east end of Aspen used to be. They are re-landscaping next door and what has happened with this extensive landscaping we have lost a building. By requiring a landscape plan I am afraid the building will disappear. Roger: If you require it then you can control it. You can see what the plantings are. VOTE: All in favor of motion and amended motion, motion carries. ISIS - WORKSESSION Donnelley: We did a site visit and observed all the story polls. Sunny Vann: We would like to make sure we are on the same track D• before going to P&Z and that is why we are back so soon. a John Wheeler: We have extended the existing wall back. We have stayed away from the back units. The four points left from conceptual one was the restudy of the free market unit and we feel we have done that and hope we have met your concerns. Another was the aspects of the tower and we changed the soldier bands and another aspect was the demolition plan. The fourth mater was the material on the alley side and the material on the upper level, brick or stone and the existing metal that is on the back. Regarding demolition the existing wall will stay in place and the walkway in front of the street along the sidewalk will be at six to eight feet high. As the facade is renovated and restored we will put panels in there such as was done with the city hall building. John Wheeler: We also supplied a streetscape elevation from the Caribou alley side which demonstrates how low it is and it will be difficult to see the eave line- from across the street. / 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 7 Roger: Where will all the mechanical equipment be placed on the roof. John Wheeler: We have discussed this brieflyfand it will be to the back and vented to the back alley. ' Roger: It will be through the roof and out the wall on the alley side. Is there additional space for future use such as a restaurant which needs venting? John Wheeler: We have not anticipated that degree of change. Linda: What is the vent that is there now going to be used for? John Wheeler: It is for the projection rooms which are currently located up front. Donnelley: I feel we are dealing with details rather than the overall conceptual and I am afbaid I am going to drop a bomb. The applicant has attempted in every way possible to accommodate our desires and if I were a lay person coming upon this building for the first time my first impression would be that all that has been saved of the block are the perimeter walls. By dropping the roof top construction and the roof top construction built form is a new event that has been proposed for an historic building in Aspen which we should all be cognizant of. By dropping that the first , impression is that you have a shell, The Weber Block and inside that eggshell you have new construction which is poking up above and behind the parapet walls. When you drop and drop you only see part of a facade, part of the volume poking up and by inference we assume that volume could drop all the way down to ground level and that is what I see when,I look at this building. There is an inferred continuation of these volumes that go right down through and we just have a thin paper wall. That is a horrible precedence. Jake: That is what is happening. Les: If you had to solve that what would you do? Donnelley: You would do something that we don't want and bring all of the development to the outside and have a break in materials. Once you pull it all back in which is what we asked for you have a definite change in expression. We do not want it part of the historic resource. You have the cubic volume rising out of the center of the shell. Jake: You will only read that from up above. Donnelley: You see it from several places. 1 13 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27. 1995 Sven: I approved conceptual because of the importance of the Isis and the revitalization. This does not look like a renovation project to me. I approved conceptual largely because of the housing program and the theatre expansion. I feel the applicant is responding to HPC's fires and trying to put out single issues but a couple of meeting ago Donnelley pointed out that we were grasping for a coherent overall solution now just a problematic solution. We still do not have a successful character to the entire project. We have the Isis, the tower, and the housing and not a common thread that ties them all together into a successful solution. It is very important that we resolve the architectural, ' solution before we go to final. »· -1 Donnelley: The new construction could be more integrated to the wall. New fabric can be integrated. John Wheeler: That is fair input and we struggled with that. Donnelley: We are talking about the expression of new and old. Possibly the top of the tower could tie into the housing etc. by materials. Sven: If you did a clay model of the masses of all of the additions you would see the three different animals and possibly you should only have two. I want to see one visual image of the Isis with these additions. Sunny Vann: At the last meeting we were to make the roof top addition different and to explore contemporary and use color. We need consensus to the character of the addition. We can refine elements and play with materials. We may never get all of your unanimous approval on this. Donnelley: John has already recognized the certain schizophrenia that exists as to the way the new is differentiated from the old. John was opening up the issue so that it could be dealt with. John Wheeler: Exactly. Sven: I do not see the tower and the overall housing on the roof top in a combined theme. Donnelley: Lets go back to the basics you have face brick on the south wrapping around the corner then it is a softer nonfaced brick that is on the east side and some on the west and now another brick needs introduced that works on the new. Roger: Why couldn't the new be cortin or something else. Donnelley: That is the architects decision and we are talking 14 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 about brick A,B and material or brick C. Also the articulation. Can the commission agree that a material should be chosen that unifies all of the new work between old and new and not several materials. John Wheeler: We would not have a problem with that and we are leaning toward masonry for function and longevity and keeping with the street facade. Melanie: No matter what you say it still looks like a shell. Susan: Regarding building structures on historic roofs I assume that hasn't been done except for Harley's place. Amy: There are a few like the Cantina that have a roof top addition but it is not this much construction and is dealt with in a different manner. Roger: In any other parts of the country are there projects similar to this that you know of that could be used as an example. John Wheeler: We feel that we have come up with an adaptive reuse of the Isis. Les: Conceptual we have agreed that they can build something on the roof. Linda: When I look at this from my own gut feeling somehow the curve on the roof of the three elements and trying to be compatible f with the tower are not compatible due to the shape of the roof. Charles Cunniffe: The idea is to have a contrast. It might be too modern. It could be dealt with by a radical change of material. Linda: No, I feel it needs to be the change of the roof line. Charles Cunniffe: One you will never see it. Susan: What if they were more curved. Charles: At one time we did think of connecting the curve between the elements and that would be be a successful solution. Sven: The tower has always been a problem as it stands alone. Donnelley: You could have surface filigree linking the front to the back to pull it all together for privacy. Les: Are you suggesting that the middle units have one roof line that goes from the front to the back or just on the side. 15 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27. 1995 Donnelley: You need to pull all of the new built forms together. Sven: I do not see these elements integrated yet and at a clay model scale level you could work with the issue, a thing growing over the Isis and blending in and integrating. Charles Cunniffe: We are beyond the gestation period. We need to tie the treatments together programmatically. Jake: I am more concerned with the street view. What if you pulled the tower forward. I am concerned about the intersection of the new piece and old piece and how they join. 1 They need a ~ clear dramatic articulation. 1 Roger: On the tower what if the entire plane were glass. Charles Cunniffee: We could draw that up if the Board desires us to go with something that modern. Donnelley: In your housing you have shown that you are pulling the glazing back from the surface of the masonry. There is another area that you want to tie together. Charles Cunniffe: We have a building that we have grown something softly over and in a way the new building is poking out of the softness and I think it would be nice if we can tie that together. Melanie: What kind of material would be softer? Donnelley: Have you looked at a panelized expression. Charles Cunniffe: You get a grid work of panelized manmade stone mix and it is a stone panel and that could contrast with the original brick. Donnelley: We need a consensus of what the issues are and give precise direction. Charles Cunniffe: We do need something left that we can design architecturally. I do agree that what we have talked about will work. Donnelley: The east and west elevation have the same expression but two different situations. The west is an historic elevation and you are bringing new construction up to it and the east elevation is new. There is no reason for them to be the same. Charles Cunniffe: We thought the manufactured stone had a nice feel to it. 16 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 Roger: I feel it is too massive. You are applying a heavy material on top of an historic building. Linda: I agree it is too massive and you need something lighter. Roger: And with a different expression. Donnelley: Roger has something there that a masonry expression gives us the feeling that this form has to carry all the way down through because it has so much weight. A lighter expression material is needed. Sunny Vann: The character of the addition can be resolved. Are you comfortable with the setback on the free market. Donnelley: I am sure all of the commission would like to see a greater setback for the free market. Sunny Vann: The free market unit is carrying this project. Jake: The old building is pounding the south axis and the top stuff is just pounding it. There is no three dimensional character to it on the top. Charles Cunniffe: Are we OK with what we have for the free market units and the modification of materials for the stair tower. Donnelley: We are talking about dealing with the expression of the building. MOTION: Donnelley moved to adjourn; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland Chief Deputy Clerk 17 . 1 ~i .0* ir ..~ , .-7311-·.75- -/ ~ -- . .4 W.. . .»4 . . 6¥: , 1 1 ' ·rt,&52. :.i.: 4% 73 t . t. d ..95 , I I ff ., 4 + . 7 2 21. i r. 4 ~ 1 - 12/ACK:: ARCH[TECTURAL: I /!k I : ) . NJ SITE PLAN L__ 1 { 1 1 AZJ LONER AND GROUND LEVEL PLANS - A22 SECOND LEVEL AND ROOF PLANS · , 4. p A3J EL-EVAT IONS · .. L. A32 ELEVATIONS A42 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.2 BUILDING SECTIONS 1 El AS BUILT FLOOR PLANS ' ' E2 AS BUILT ELEVAT/ON AND SECTIONS H WEBBER 4 ill I r. A 1 1892 1 -49 %- i,l 11%- 1 -1_ 4, 11 ...r.... I i - 1 1 . i ... 6 ~ #--*il-* -I-*I- -i----Illil r-- 1 1 .1 i 1 1 1 1 T L 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' liI'll , 1 Lilli ! -1_---1 , El- i 1,1 '·3 1 11 ..[ 1 , 4 11 11 li 1 il lili 1 1 : 1 lilli 1 .1 1 1 !lili III lili 1 1 V k 1 ISIS RENOVATION 406 EAST HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO i.- ' :h. ' I * 7-Ah -bu C CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ,<Li .; ' 42 ffi...f hee*-- h : f . Ie-94 t: :·: 1-4. CA 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. * SUITE 301 * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970/925-5590 * FAX: 970/925-5076 U. 11-2-95 3. .- 0- .*t . -E ... E.at '2,6Lgid~17*1219Ilij'Fri"i,7,"I"I"Mijf. .1,211# Je;Mijak¥,LE' M~ 1 11 11 lil i 1- 1 : ~ t.- 6 - *:-225·..':6.:pl · - -*iti::·il·4 7.5¢--- -t. - -*- 4 - I . 1 .- - . .r . .F r- .ir , t·t-4 ..4.· 0.- 1 A =1 - 1 - .... . _ . 9-I- rr · -- ····* ,+~·~i~:0. · - -. 1- I i-=, 'EOR/'' . . - 2-01 1/1 . 9 7-9 - +B .i---5-/-- -- - ·36 . r.= .. _ V --1-J gez„- -31 - -:*: -' - _1005- - .. ' , - A>. 1,1 ... 1 - -1,2~ Rrl- 1,· 2*M A f P · - 4 .;.cr - ·'~ ,'.~~~ 4'·2-;fli~ 123 4 ' :--- -/ ·-8*(1.-- 1 -1 =7 1=~ I I V. ... = 2 1 .r. ~ - c---Ets-Eff -P-~-I:t{ 6// - 3¢ - - 4.222*e.: 7*1 -f- 1 .4 . . -lit- . 4... 6, *eff -€0 - » -<2 1.1 iii ."I trT //11 . - i -* 22:· 7 ze• ya ... I '>' - - - 52 6845*29:,5 -' 1.4 -/'7 1·.24*V -* ' 1 13*%- 7 -*dr,=4%2» 9 ' .3 . , -1 157- - I - -Ill. 1 1 4 - C :t i R .2..r-,¢ ~'*:·~4·-·•0•,Z*.*;*~. mr- - yl. v f-'' £ 5 il~~ Sliwh#MIE,->Ii gli#*01/3 ,< « T~-Ah; "Wf+17-1, -- . ~. 1 i · 04 - - --3,2*Per--27*'0 - ,p.g~2~~~&Smbe.,.g U 2, . . ./ *r - ~ r «2€6.47 :,41 154/- - - - 12-4464 212219. . - *--1 : #*- - - 4 i i il I i jit i ,fGBMR mawdfi&-9 94F rlA: c*ki ~~ 1.- 9yerr~ '.4 - , 25F,' ,~t,cv~ ._-=ti'*~~'r . - 1.-,rt- r.4.jet> 74.*.. - r - . ./. ...3„4. ... , I i : 41 1 ~~EL ..77 -1.,4. '. -- 1 --23--- /.1- * ~6 -,4.£7.'./,I-;€~dr: L<Wh- r. . 4/. 7 i iN -2£2=03-7 - -~17* - lf-k. --40 rL b ZER?*i~ i 1 5- :ge©292;t;y~yz-L --- _._- 1 €14-7 - j. -- - 2 057.4. -iF -~ 1 *-id' It =li .r- *- TA - 01¥ark , um - rt_ - _- . 1 3<+,il. C «-2,4/7,--1 F~m~· ·- , F 35¥>.1. a- 1 ..'01. -312~4*4 -4-----I»----=0- JEFTE,AFFTIVI~*~72:#6.:.ctr A --- 'i? ! - - -- - -- , -'*112 7-11 1 -12 =732.1 --2. 7 -72%• 7906341-/4//L ' fat:, 09· 1271' - + as' r ¥.:(722/1 fe -- ,6, i - + - --*- t ' ..te,- " W L.]li . - 45.2 4 *70 1-- 4 4. 30{1 -4 ..i·. · .. .1 - -r. ~- . - 17* L.7. 2 -It---- - - - -I - 4- <..2.2~58~ . ~ f I - - - . . 2 :. - -r . 0 7 ./ ---1.4.5 -t'·.-t- -,€·I~·23t':·413, - - -1 - ..e- - ... .. 4/1 ~·•1~1/1111P.-.*0"/I"4~.I.'..1/I. *.'I'.I.%.. .1~4*~-11~„.-I./1 4.. \1 L - -am ° 4 1 9-1--yo - L -- 1, . 1 . li~j~ M~kiV~*1 4 ,*#F 4 l- 1 AJO -+MNe Ile L/:-/L Pit'"$-&*'.1,# - 1.- .t 4. 1. f...94 4 1 ~ 'L 3¢« A iSA, f.33.7\~.\., t<Pi~' 1 i ; ~'VbL:/•-,g~ e Y : 2,...1 6 6. 1 1 "i. . ' AA.41 46~14 .,4 · ) ., ' ··It:<tai r % 4- 1 91* 1 V %.1 9*gue / 1 09 i t ' .....4 44'41 i 4 :h t i ' '- :..,»--Ar'M · 60 . 14 .. , t.,44 - 3 ' 0 r r 1 t . - ' i 1 - , ...3.*,1.'i " *aki· 4 0 0, i li i 4 - 9,, L. I 1 1 f - ,-ff + i 0. 24\.,8.. 2 , 1 R. :, 4.+441 :bio·~·~·····. .o. Ii>'.,l- 4-./ '... t. . / 4 : /' )*. I .\41\,>r¥*e• A#,42~44322394 /1 . 1 . . .. . ' f ,- 9 -i 1%~2 1 ,./ , r ag , 1 . 1.*~ ;. 4% , y $1 2.4 ... r . *.4, 4 ' 1.4*41 > . 4 , . 6,5 -1. & I. »deD. h 444-2*.46 . . -lie,- f 4 4.32-34,3. r m O Z m S C At m 4 1'~ '4 4 / 3 Ita ........... m *AS 14 MILL STREET ' n, .·it·e 1 (=1 ·12! 9 1-00 *1 - 1 1 CD 0 Im --9 00 8 Mm -1 X 0 9 - - 'r.1 .r Z 0 I .:382*St@*:28FAM>UN:*Ni.,42 4 0 .. 243%39*3» .4.2»>-:. ~-2 2~ 9 :p,hstk©Li<·b'>23>4262>134 '2%94 : I >h I . 4 61 1 ..1.ft,V. ..v<~12~ < V..., .1~ ·t -0 ?5 22<*3:442<*>4*·:g·:34 *.... I CARIBOU ALLEY 7+4 1 U ...... v %> 22 1· f >t, Pr I : Vath<413**~ . 4 '4»f ,-7·..90*9 2.9~ .9/ 2.-' W.. , G z I I I - ..~.f..·: 7« ~ - ·· ts>*· 4, 1 •,A/ * .j....07459*~»3:-i.4. ~-- 2*45**QUIVK#444.5 AR 4.4 . I - 1-11 4, . 00 2 43 01 9- 9 d~ O 0 /21/ r -CD g= gl 5 Z /3 1 a 0 - 0 , 0 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN | ~ i M & EM ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Em$ 3,& I 00 5 1 2 1-4 1,0 am" 4 t 1 :tz 1 LOTS L,M, & N, BLOCK 87 520 EUT HYON AVE ' SUrrE 301 0 WEN CO 81611 • TELE: 303425-55,0 * FAX 301425-5076 w i 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLOMDO AVE ' TEUURIDE CO 81435 0 TEU: 301728-3738 ' FAX: 301728-9567 i '<662,.WL-,1.2'• ~~- , - , i -// 1.- U CANTINA BUILDING ~.„Ver 7.V,T' -p- . -. --'9•· -1~FI"" vv~/I- L 4 - , .f *' ·9 00 C r 4.- I NET LEASABLE AAEA FAR.AREA 11 . 1 1 H 4,133 LOWER LEVEl O PHOJECTION GROUU) LEVEL 7,083 10.623 ROOM 0 lJPPER LEVEL 0 5,680 H Ff APPUOt#ON 8-23-45 GRAND TOTAL- tl,216 16,303 PROjECnON RNAL SCHEMATIC 11 2 95 H.PC APPL IVISED 027-0 PAZ SUIMITTAL 190-95 ' . ROOM B -·1__L-3- r U PRCXJECTIOIJ - DN UP ROOM C PROJECTION 9 - - @de r- ROOM A [10*A /8/ - -T--1-4 1• : F-7 1 1 . 1 1% * li :I · ' 1 1 Uf / 3=1 2f ~ TRASH AREA - 11 11 1 WFUGF ' ~AMP UP (10% SNOW MELTED) METER LOCAnON r-,m~ E : 11 TENANT STORAGE It 11 R EXIT CORRIDOR 111 ..64©04%4 4 JI A C Ld ,- MECH. EOUP up ... ' . :..\ lup g EXIT CORRIDOR ~~ ~- 1~ -- ~ ~ - .. ~.. 4/2~04 m 6-. 4- D 0 - 9 - 4 Ab :. I ThEATEP B ' <t·Q 1 I THEATER A THEATER D .P- . 3 44: 300 SEATS ~ ' 260 SEATS +A 210 SEATS ro SEATS 1 44 HANDICAPPED'i (4 HANDICAPPED, (4 HANDICAPPED) (4 HANDICAPPED) .:t.. ..:2 1 44 -:··:41·i 1/ - " Iall- 1 . Fl ~:/ -1 - FOX PHOTO FIRE HOUSE. . TENANT SIORAGE D U 8- 0 r. - j .%% . 6. .. 226 4 4 R 24 43/ ~ 9.14.0..3 2 4 -NE.\4 JAN F . 1 Vl n VESTRULE n CL ,<43.\{\ 4 6 3/ '1 lu : u I ~'6~'/ 'Alit.. 1 -7 5 1 J 1 1 L RAMP uP LOBBY up FT-- _-=Up 1 1 up 2 - ~~IBULE F · STOR VESITBULE -,---,-=== 11 6 r-- Z UP DIJ | CONUSSION | R ' \3:C 2 LOBBY I -1* 08 --. F . -.I- Ch ' «~E 1 , . 1 1 1 1 1 ELE V MVOMEN *+--/-+---' *-*-t-'' ¢+4·-t- ++*·*-++---4-r MEN £ ,. 3 j 3 LOBBY - ~ -ip",--F:~L„*-:-~1:JF,- --il:FF-::- TICKETS I X 1/9/- .1 516151 61 9@gr 1 / \ .4-4- 1---+FT--al42Ittilll- 4 11 -, IL 1 L_-1 --ti:Ittl=I=ULL=41** A~A|A|~~ rtl~4»6 Hira-41··44· :...4..6.-t *-in··6. i.*.k.4-6/././*.EE-, Z DRAWING U FLOOR MA,6 /7\ r©·L /Al CA KE, F©TIRED,€09€F€.DE . - . UJ 0 U 100 NO. 9521 ® LOWER LEVEL PLAN ~ GROUND LEVEL PLAN ~. DATE 11-2-95 9.. - 1'-0. 74' - 1'-0. ~ SHEET NO , NET LEASABLE AREA F.A.R. AREA NET LEASABLE AREA F.A A. AREA 25 2 THEATER 6,4!56 8,442 THEATER 3624 0 PACUEC'lON BOOTH 509 0 INDICATES PROJECTION BOO™ 627 744 NET LEASABLE *AUSCI€,ttECH/STORAGE NA 1,437 A2.1 AREA hAISCIRCAJECHETORAGE NA 0 TOTAL 7,083 10 823 TOTAL 4,133 0 OPEN SPACE = 538 .f-'r-- Z 02 6 16 & SHEET OF c 3/1// 0,~p, a•••M «wrM-,1 S.1331!HONV 333!NNOD S3 NOI1VAONIRI SIS! . 0665-540[ Jill . L191U O.) 'NidGY . IOE U.InS . '1» NWNAH 15¥3 Zy NX)18 111,1 . 5[tul 03 01(]nlnnll . 'PU 0(1¥110100 3 00¥*)102) N3d SV in NBAV SNI>IdOH 15¥3 904 .... -,r~„ a V.„.my- 7 TV'.,7„,„1 ~~F 7™„ 4- 14 1 ) K 2, l - ON, 1 MECH. ROOM CM MAC -UCATION 8-11-95 MAC -1 UVISED 9-27/0 <1 11KAL SCHEMATK 1,-2-·95 Djff- £~h· MID-LEVEL 1 1 / f 1 1 |8 <~C 1- n----I------ 18 3 BR BR I BR B.R ./-| 7- A. 4 A. H. UNIT A , r-4+17 1 A. H. UNIT B Il 1 r VAUL'ED ROOF VAULTED ROOF ~ V v- i -7 L.,ZE*E---·1 Er-LAIi--- 14m JIM rit„ T /-+- Itttl f MIL 1 . »1 1 i B.R 44' 1 BR 1 11*N l A L.R 4 +11 Fl.Al ROOF ~ ~ 1 || VESTIBULE 1 *i- 1 r---·- ---- -ilkqi,ALLBILM -------- ____________ -_-1 -- c:=rrrJIT:,1 -* i /- 1 DECK /17\ 1-1 -- BELO - - ~ 42-4 7 + 1 V I i i j i i 1 3 f i--1 1 1 1-1- ·-]Ft·T- fil#---Ul - -' -4--i - i 4..,. . 1 1 kcL=---_ FLA 4 -r-t-+ 4 -t. 4- -4 I 1 1 4-1 1 B.R B R "-k 1 1 1 1 f.4 4-4- t 1 4. ' , Z , t i- 4 VAULTED ROOF * 711 ' U 1II + +- 1 STO 440 It-1 -1 t··'·-t+,4-1 -M-- . .. X > -1_1 -- ROOF 1 DECK CLO ~ Tttt!-fTT-t+4 +1- , : 1 BELOW - M B / .CLLJI '. 2~,' -1 L_}~.4_.1-; , ~ 4. ---11 -=7--42. 1 1 -1 1 E. ' . I FREE MARKET UNIT 1 1 1 _1 -·--- 1 MB 9 LR DR ' ~ ' - -- 1 1 VAULTED ROOF f - gC . - , .... 1 1 1 ------- k I 7 --1 J f DECK BELOW m > 1 90*14.*.2 3;'AZAL*-4 - U . .' 4 '/ 46: r )<M - - > I. =·· · . .. '· 1.' · 14 .. /' P, ,/- >·. ROOFBELOW U 1 1 %@ i I I m 11 11 mil 1 1 1 1 1 1 CS.." CA \45' \My \25, rh SECOND LEVEL PLAN ~ 14)oR MAFf -~-_r ~ ROOF PLAN ~ DIMWING 1 96" - r-o· M 6,6.1 0 NET UVABLE AREA F.A.A AREA AFFOADABLE HOUSING 2120 2.610 U ]00~~252£-/1 - FREE MARKET UNIT 1950 2,050 g DATE 11 2-95 ~ SHEET NO, ELEVATOACIRCULATION NA 323 MID LEVEL NA 697 TOTAL 4.070 5.680 *f-* 1.... ~ A2.2 Z 0 2 6 16 6 SHER oF € c[/1//fl 0,4,/5 a/0/q "/0/Ir' S.1331!HZ)ZIV 333!NNAD 53-IMV NOILVAON3kl SISI %05-52610€ 773 . 0655 03 'NES¥ . toE illnS . 'lm N¥'hAH 15¥3 Oa 713.1 . 5£,le Or) 'JUDInT11-1 . 11¥ ClanK)-100 -1 0ZC ocm!0100 NldSV'3nN3AV SNIN - 7 .' , kai -I , *." .=04€4... 2 .1 1. 1.4.4 . 1 Arl Y. '3'jf)*I -'lks 4 ·1' 6 7,< 7 41.-R · (122·01:.· * .6 - 1 .. 1 ..1 ~ <00:i :t 1 6 I , 41 -.- . · r , W - 1 L -21 + I j I "1 . 0. 4 0.,X.C~I:11:. 03 C) J-TE- E Il' lili= - 1- - 1 lilli 11 F . 4 1--7 Ill . . I Gr ·4 1 84 o /9.* ' 9 r"---mli---75<411%181-=ENE-j..)ODlt£-~25'Th i l 1 119 Elit *i if .t rgil'll,IN'? liKINI- rl .~ 1.------J 11 , _13 - illfilt#~*-#ji!~ 115 r---------- - . 0+ MIFI'l"m-Fl i:& autiwij.~./"1111 - 0 0 IIi CO 1 1 C .m~ 1 \, #114}{§11*U Ow; u.iL- - 1_i 9 % 18811¥3*ilibl- 111,4 , m r m 78111,"al~F,di".4 9=, . 2- =WIllia 1 ' 1 1 Iii\' (-D > al000062'G[12&L NE 4 ~--=4 11\\1 -1 .7- - :3' 1 kitl- , b 5 - ty 'm~~'~MIN~1~1'all i. :mild,•40 ' I =27~:~ I 1 Z .i 11 .- - ' 11 ill E-LJ >:2: -3 i s---f * :d': 9//Iii~ Il I'-, ~~1 · i 1, -- - f.=C .11 . · ·.1, - ~4! .}i niiA-liGFI , 1- 11 11 :~1..-7 uta 1- 11 1 1 1,1 11 Z= i ! ) iF- .- .1 .RB=Ii=im'li M .1,- 1 1 . I It-- 1 11 1- Ir:.r»_· . * u --1 111111111,111 11 1- 1.1 Irmi i ~_ 1 ' *8 - 3p f '94 ,+~- I PL *% ./ I -* 9 -4#9"*/4/5 ,# g Cl 1 1 == ' 1 11 t-tr =--/1 ~-11 -1 14- 1 11 lili'+71 11 I iii i.,r - 14 i lino I . 1 1 -LT 13 1.~ ,'11'liliT 1111-1111:1!11·' - 1 ' ,·11 zi lili 1 i --J 8 1 l FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1 4 >1 1 * ~ EM 1 @E ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS I > 5 *la I imi CA) 1 1 Ke,r lili 00 1 i Q 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 1. COLO«ADO AVE. • TEUURIDE, CO 81435 ' TELE: 303/72,3738 ' FAX: 301728.-9567 j LOTS L,M, & N, BLOCK 87 520 FAST HYMAN AVE. • RE[ 301 • ASPEN, (D m611 • TELE: 301925-5590 • FAX: 301425-5076 SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION NOI1VA313 1SV3 --Ii---i--Il.I-.-Il--I~-9/i--I' .•-r--•-1-- 1./ir•.9--2.92~·~-r/-P•,- *--Fe 4.· 1 . 1 - ... V Eah , .• '' 1 1 ./ .4 .. € 44 440,4 + -1/ kif 14,.A '• kl g 3> Z 0 -4 I) m un -4 rn -0 Xf= r . *ddip*Sisa,36~ . r $ 1 6,1,4. am - dili: 2-3 *21#Ell& 21 Tz APJA 111'ii CZI *1 %111*Mi~SmqMdwp.*343"*2111' f---4 I. --4 14 ... 1 / C} I--1 1 + 7 1 h · i 1 Ill 344/ & 8 wt - -~ ":,f:'~2 2 : 11' ~~ 1 0 101 /4 9" / Z ¢tt-2 -Er- - - , 1 ....4--9 L · fil ·i - r-· -2£_ + MAK'HU~~*0~1 '£201-4- - -4 ' ~ ~ 5 1 En \ 1 1 11 . 0.-; liN 0 *91, 11'11-1 11 -- i303¤5 1 A/.. - 1/- = 2.Fail 1 1 .,1 2_-_ZE E ...-- -Ell,- , f - i 1 *-1=2,=-=Ul.4- --r~ -- -- .----------T--F-IT7 1 ILL - - - ! 1 1 ===r-- , 1- i 74.- iam-:tfil¢:237'·!I -- -- I I -I- -- t-z · .4.K 1 - I - - I ~*Et- a««*1~71 /, 04 26 j~ ~22*r =--~ .-~---~IFT-1 »- ~= Z= = . 6#S --#-26=LU: A-1 4. - £448@2*134/4 83 it.. i- L E--=2 +VE ,-- 1 442 2 1 22*&24 -== = 2- I ./. 2 ./ tr.·. I 1 8 V i 2 1 m I .#f i~ r. ~r _ I · 3-m--=---= i -_= 41 SIINS[4 - - =fla.00&1 , i F // r:=153% =14~~ iR-- i ry- _ *18!El#!mWII Aft-9.4/: TE:~ : ·- 'h'WInit,14·Uwwn„ 1 E '{**m!8*21 91 .9,2.14. J 3 f,/ 4 lei !€ e % $9* . 1.:a L. A ..4.4 + 1™14.0 Ed.6,41 Prf. -- r FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN | /S/S RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 2,0 0, F. b 4 1 Q k) el LOTS L,M, & N, BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. • SUrIT ]01 * ASPEN, CD 81611 • TELE 301925-5590 • FAX. 303425-5076 -hi , 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE. ' TEUUR**,CO 81435 0 TELE: joy725-3738 ' FU 303,72&-9567 r. ..... I. ' .... ..,., . 312.<.4~ 1~%..241&&~~ . 5.Al 6 :1 7. FIRE STATION NOI1VA313 1S3M ORTH E FOX PHOTO . -9 .r-~ - ' ~ - I " '1.-: 7,1.4:,J laffi".Fgpi , '1 , .. T.!"r", TWO/2 7. . ~ .:I.-pl-%..7 )p P- -F'll- C . 4-t t. - -~B 9 1 CA ~-~-- I IREE MARICET UNIT »4 // DECK . 1 AFF. HSG. APT H.FC A~UCATION 0-21-45 FINAL SCHE&#ATIC 8*as H.P.C APFL. IV"m -7-15 P & Z SUIMITTAL 1040-06 4 4 . 1 f~ '7,4 y , PLENUM PROJECTION - ALLEY LOBBY - 1 THEATER A S :R f Eli 1-LU - k e 5/ m 2 U ' PLENUM PROJECTION I. LU THEATER C PUBUC TOILETS STORAGE N --11 U ~ BUILDING SECTION 41 1 ii 0 2 6 16 f Z ku U am Z DECK - - --0-- i.-- 0 C. m § AFF HSG APT < - 62 --0"Ke MECH PROJECTION THEATER 8 ' TRASH -- -24 ~ " 11 PLENUM 11 1 Z ORAWN; 11 11 11 1 0 8WLDINO SECTONS M · . , U 1 M MECH il --ir--it 11 1 W 11 1 L · 11 It It 1 0 11 1 1 . 11 1 62 p. NO. _MM.__ _ STORAGE it i MECH I 11 1 1 11 1 ~- DATE n -2-95 1 --- . W SHEET NO. E A4.1 ~ BUILDING SECTION < Z 6 SHEET of 0 2 6 16 /,0//'0" O-/ ao.- A./amr . "919 03 MUS¥ . 311.1 . st,2 03 '*mnnal . ·im 00¥301~1'2513A,%3:,13!=2~ 1573 9Ot I....1#•1?Z.. t.44¥/eD..t,- *. .' I I '. 0 ··1 44 = · 9 r ..01 ./.3 4 «, '7 ' 18 r4 ~ . ~ O 0 .'AA C)' g , 1 Ir. .1 lei>~k„~% ..L---- ./MM"MF#.......,- -6- Jt EVE88[ ~r~i~ ~284*Rfi* ~1 0 #§%*mug-let•'HIn·Iwtt·WV " %81112·4111 Z rh NE·tt- ,rusn„ruirwu-:wuuu"w:nn~ -nI?88*88;Mi, CO i . :1901!tylOODL}, h--T~- 6 m 4.4 47*21 . lipit. 1' t.a fi®miltly ! 0 •- - 9(188888©f:11 , 0 9.iff 9 . A##but#4 1 ~ ~ , r«4..,1 - ... 1 r. 7 ' ' ~ Al# 1 1 1 - 1 1%.:i .grat .., 1 '!~'!Il, I :. f.i·i*~·lk. 1 0- · ·17 1 1-3€122 EA · i t - - - 390.... 1 1 2 - liji 4 9 \\ :111! o 3%*9. o . AL-1.1- *97 1 I IN"*#,>6 1 . -,...1 0-, r_ . L. 1 1 4 1911%111$!It ijwt'Wili}Ul,IU- A I ' Iaw " 0 3• ·· ·44WWWth·Il*nt~1 ~ ., > r §1 1--1 . »r ' ' r -1 1 43 , t, I Mt . All *14% .5.: I.-' 9 ·r~ f · £41»\ , -4 1 --i -4-1 4 ~Nfl I .. h m -34 4-*··126 „ 1. 32 7.- 1-. i /k ... V~ 4 1-1-1. I /1 1 91'11 1 1 1 -__-1 1 I. S 9 Di ..E'. t. » FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN | 1 4 0 ~\3 ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS :=Sm M 00 I 1* & di i 1 Q kl LOTS L,M, & N, BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYM*4 AVE.• SUrrE 301 • ASPEN, CO 81611 • TELE. 3034234590 • FAX: 303425-5076 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE. ' TELLUQI*, CO 8,435 ' TEU: 301728-3738 ' FAX: 307728-4567 111-U#-U~~,..~.1-~7£4<~Sjl.61'J.il.11-6.~~~~ fT€?ra- NOI1.VA313 0 V rHEATER 8 31Va )~ ~-·- r·- ~ . -;314///,.•7•h-hipr-~.g~.,30„. ~1 27-,=1?r.~ t.· 14-P C yMRAIK]N D 13 95 : *1· - ... M.P.C.AM't.OV~Il) 9 17 95 P & t 4*111 ME 10 10 99 FIMI R.}thWK 4 2 95 T T T T T T T - - - - - 0 + .-- ------- ..----.. ...-0 ... .-I .. 1 0-- .......... - 4-7 -1 0 .... .... ... 1 1 1 ~ 32 C ¥] C ic 2-; 0 It 11 -----11 0 SCREEN L. J . 1 1 3E 11 0 LU 1 1 4 1- 11 1 _- - I srag. 'EN - U CK 1 1 j r---1 ~ i 1 1 11 0 1 1 t '11 1 L--CDt! 0 . 1 lit , 1 11 1 + U . 2 1 Ill . , 1 1 1 .1 1 0 4 li 11 1 SHOP , 4 2 1 1 ; 1 1 1 · D U 11 1 ,1 11 + 0 F/RE STATON 1 11 f bu.---0 - -- 11 41 r---7-. 1 1 FOX PHOTO i|r. 4'' 1 ' SEATING AREA , 0 1 1 1 11 0 11 ----- It I Z 11 ' U ' lf-,BATH . 1 10 I - ; 11 6.2.61.... ..U o 1 1 1 - 1 ~ t! ' r.. STMAGE ~ I 1 1 1 .1 1 1 WORK /?00,9 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 /11 1 0 1, 1 1 1 1 , 1 9======= = 1 1 1 1 ' 1,1 512?. i 1 ' :1 0 1 , 1 , 1 . 1 e,-=- --- . SHOP , 3 11 u L__n. L -11 4--3 i i 11 1 CONCESSION STAND 1. 1 --- - =4 , 4----,-----* * 2, 6 ' 'egp .i- . 1 2 1:7 - O === L === 1 - '1·I ./ /1 . 02 1 1- 't t 4-Ed:-t tlufF',.. 1 Lata' AREA 426, 1, 1 , 6 M a~ f'f t 2 7 -1 .7.-1 -7 . la /1,4 0 0 J. . I \ / 4 :14 ~ DRAWING C) DEMOUTION & EZ yOBIUZATio®-~UE /7\ LOWER LEVEL DEMOLITION & MOBILIZATION PLAN O LU LU LEGEND GENERAL NOTES; ~- DATF 3-945 62 JouL- ~ZZZ~ STRUCTURE TO REWAIN IN PLACE WITH TEWOP-m ~ e HIGH SCREENED CHNN-UNK FENCE ~ REMNABLE BARRICADES AS NEEDED < BAKING AND SHORING DURING CONSTRUCTION ~ E HIGH SCREENED CHNN-LINK GATE ~ LOCATION OF TEMPORARY € O HIGH SCREENED ~.-.~ sT AUCTURE TO BEE DEMOUSHEED AND REWO/ED FROW SITE, FOR DE{NEm TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT CHA/N-UNK FENCE AS REQUIRED 8 PHASE OF 64.1 SH' 1 1 NO BRICKS FROW EXISTING SIDE WALL TO BE SALYAGED FOR POSSIBLE DEMOIJTION/CONSTRUCTION ~ REUSE IN RESTORAT 91 OF HISTORIC F ACADE. ALSO METAL- ~ STAGING YARD IN EXISTING WCANT LOT L) 9{)~NG FROM ALLEY. • ~ 6 WIDE SCREENED 4,0 CCMERED TEMP*ARY PEDESTRIAN D1 WALKWAY IN STREET TO WEET UTY ST ANDARDS. < Z 01 I ..... l... t......... 9405-ST E XYd • 0655-5 26101 :3131 • tt916 03 'NadSY . &0€ lital . 'MY #'ANA# 15¥3 025 1956-9 0[ ·TY=3 . 9[Ze-92£,EOE 1111 . fill@ 02) 'K]INAT131 . 147 00~0103 '3 OZE OCI~lio-!Ojg ~g~)n,NV~ SNIN 15¥3 90* NOI.LVAONBM SISI '?9 0 ' 4)f- 1 ' -/ - -1,M- .. -- . 4 1'18' . .9 - i_-- &.1, .v 1 ~ 53 1 r'- -4- . -~-' .1, 2 -.4 V. : i' ·74112,47.,.7.1*,47 - .... 7-f - . . C 1/(4 ' 4 1 .-6,... : IN CA H.Pt WHJAIN]N B 2111 46 M.F.L. AFFI. CVISM) 9 17 95 P & / Ma«UN 1010 9, 'INAL. St]~MAIR. 104-0 1 1 1 1 11 11 . 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 / It 11 1- 4 L .6. Ir 91 / 1 f 1131 1-J 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 | HOOF ARE A 11 1 1 1 1 li 9 1 -1 1 1 11 1 1 1 li --Li----4 |_I -- 1 T I Jr' r--- 'fuzzz-11 1 1.9 ~ ' BEDROOM lir K/TCHEN ~ 1-1 1- 11 1 : 11 -- EXET-ING ROOF TO 41 BE HFWOVED 1 1 ~ 7 It 1 4 - BATh UVING AREE , ILF 1 4 - - 11 1 1 11 1 -5 I r .jiti FOrER _ ..T ./ 4 f 0 1 C -- BEDROOM 1 CE=/ 61-- , CDr# I 0 4 A; or--4- 4----- i LI . STaR. 1 6. - 0 . 1 . lilli' 1 1 -1 - 1 1-1 1-1 1-1 14 /1. 11 1 1 OFFEE 11 1 w . i, " 'ACE I 11 Z DRAWING, /-\ DEMOLITION ROOF PLAN Ch UPPER LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN (~] DE MOUT~( ~Ati LU 0 I I -- ------- LEGEND ~- DATE 5 9 95 E 0 62 „ NO. .?L - ~3==~ST-RUCTURE TO REWNN IN PUCE WITH TEWOPRARY < BRACING AND SHORING DURING CONSTRUCTION 2/ SHI[I No ST RUCTURE TO BE DEWOUSHED AND REAIWED FROW WTE. BRICKS FROM EXIST ING SIDE WALL TO BE SALVAGED FOR POSSIBLE ~ REUSE iN RESTORATION OF HISTORIC F *CADE. ALSO WETAL J SONG FRO, tiy. ~ 0 2 * ·.adri. ....1.€...4.*fe...1. · 2~'i.,<4.·::,i'-.· ~.6•·:,· -:f 27.:<,1., ''.441#:t . Ce 01 . 469. a,4 ,~ lit. I 54- '*29;,i*I+5622-4*.t' Z . - ,@k . ....... ,&21-2.~@GRiEt 9//kilur'LiMiHMA - =-- .fji 1 ' L. rl | S1331!HOW¥ 333!NNn:) 53-IZIVHD NOilVAON32! SISI 9:05-1ZM=OE X'ft . 0655-526£01 :3131 • 11916 03 'hEWS¥ . &0[ 3.Or!5 -'3AV #VhA4 19¥3 0£5 Ze >Dole 9 Wl 5101 £956-@CUED€ ·)(Vd . GELE-924€0£ Mil . 5{,19 03 30,MOT!31. . 'MY 0(»0103 '3 OCE O(]¥30100 N3dSV '31N3AV SNI>ldOH 15¥3 90+ *grl, 444 / /7 LIU Del 0 8/ C 1 1..: . I. .t1iF4WI ca,~; tij. f,k .31.?'.~.'- 4 * 4 , 4 ! A4.1 PROJECTION ROOM D 11 11 PROJECTION / ROOM B , .- , f [IN 4 1 PROJECTION ROOM C PROJECTION -1-- 556.06 S.F NET ROOM A 249 4.1 621.95 S.F. NET F -21 ' OPEN 2 i i» 1 1 1 , 1 11 11 11 F 11 11 u d / (ADA . " TRASH /METERS 1 11 - / l REFUGE ~ RAMP UP (10% SNOW MELTED) , UP TENANT STORAGE H ~- AREA) / 402.29 S.F. u , L > -/ /1 1 200 S.F. --Ii.ril-~ MECH. EQUIP. _ C 462.8 S.F. NET EXIT CORRIDOR DN.'--+3 +- UP . UP . UP EXIT CORRIDOR 1 3\\ 1 ,~34% 44<v 79 1 69\»14> : : 33\ ./.N ./ r- $.Ri :©4 02. ©01. ,~91\« « « - A /\\ 09\22\ 4< 49 I .~Al 1/ 1 THEATER NET LEASABLE 6783.84 S.F /'P\ .NON ...62 24 4 ~14.2 1 \\I .' 0»\ C FOX PHOTO FIRE HOUSE 1 42 TENANT SORAGE D 41{- tff-t~~~ THEATER C 1,750 S.F. ../ 399 THEATER A THEA-ER B THEA-ER D V 250 SEATS +/- 190 SEATS +A 4.292< 2,666 SO. FT. 2,r,22 30. 7. 163 SEATS +/- 100 SEATS +/- 4«: '. \\ (4 HANDICAPPED) (·4 h~PID CAFPED) 1,726 :30. FT. 1,041 SO. FT. (4 HANDICAPPED) (4 HAND CAPPED) 24:1...0-1 . 30'63 )3 I .4 \\. Z 402 THEATER a NET LEASABLE 3731.65 S.F. 0 x ... \\34. foo« LL- JAN. 62\\9.- 4, 2\\ Z 1 X ,0. .\\13»94 , 0 - ~~> ~ VESTIBULE n CL. 414 - ima</0/ liN // I I . CL lili -lF- up..4-2~ JAN. .%\\0.:I -1 . 1 X ' · RAMP UP LOBBY / VESTIBULE < , / 1 U'32 -- 1/ 4 1 1 1 ......i 11 14/ a . \ / \\. ./ I. STOR. VESITBULE el ..-'..jill ~6+*b-#-I+-- LI~- --- -- ----1----- - 2/1 -46;ill ' 11 El DN 1 . 4\?t<»f 1 CONCESSION I 1 1 1 r// . h r··7-1-p·i 1 ~ 1-7 Fri fr i u L 1 1 1 1 1, 11/ / 7.- f &22\ t -) (_, ~ (- , C_ ) _P *- 1. 3 ELEV. 1 1 1 T'1111111 3 MEN C 13 WOMEN \ .AREA) / LOBBY 1-4-23 --10FFItE yHOU#INGLL- 3 L-C' f J i / 1 C 11 i ANTAT pOLIR- 1 L 1 r- / 3 / ·3 / . LOBBY - t«v r r r r r rf TICKETS Iii 1!i, i 11 r -1-41 --1-- RIAIA 9 9 E 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 r ilk , 1 j 1-12-0 DISPLAY CASE * DISPLAY CASE 3-T-1 i~--f-~-9---i I ~-f~ _ _ 1 /\ 3 1, J :1 0 c--=11 i -/ --/' \ ~~)E@EEE@ICL_ ---- - 1 1 , 1 MARQUEE | ~ DRAWING 0 6 w 7 FLOOR PLANS /7\ -- - RESTORED HiSTORIC F A.LUE AW./ 1 45' ' Z - LOWER LEVEL PLAN - GROUND LEVEL PLAN . - ~ JOB NO._9521__-_ (1) (2) &-- DATE 7-26-95 - 78" -1'-0" U j SHEET NO. THEATER NET LEASABLE 4287.71 S.F. THEATER NET LEASABLE 7405.79 S.F. 0.- TENANT STORAGE 1917.73 S.F. WALLS /CIRC./MECH. 1798.62 S.F. O- WALLS /CIRC./MECH. 2948.67 SF ~ A2.1 U , ~ SHEET OF 4 :Al NORTH c COPYRIGHT CHARUS CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /1 44'.u S1331!HONV 33=IININAD SH-IMVHZ) NOilVAONBM SISI DE,XVI * 065S-SZ6/EOE :3131 * LL910 03 'N3dSV * [0£ 31lnS * '3AY NIYWAH .LS¥3 OTS-- - ZQ 33019 A311¥ 'N 9 'IN'l SIC)1 Z956-8Zb/£0£ XVJ * 9€ZE-9ZZ/[0£ 3-131 * SEti.8 03 '3(]13(11131 * 3AV OCIVHO1O0 *3 0ZZ ODVMoloo NEIdSV '3nN3AV SNI>IdOH 1SV3 901, Na dINVEI RAMP DN Na dINVU :442 03+•4*2·.4,22~~ C CM 99 i 1 i i i! 1 1 1 / 1 ' B.R ~ ST UP.. MECH. EQUIP. B.R A L.R. MECH. ROOF EJU L.R. MEI:H. B B - I ' DN' RCOF ====- 0 0 0 2 WALLS /CIRC. MECH. l~ ~~iP r- 1 WALLS /CIRC. MECH. A. H UNIT A 1058.25 S.F. NET 1591.91 S. F. .P...... A, H. UNIT C 1058,25 S,F. NET 842.45 S.F. - 6-; K. ST 4 -r-4- 1-11 OPEN B.R. ~ *9 PU (41 K. ~t-r- t- 1 B.R. 1 1 B.R. K. D R 249-L WALK WAY B R. K. D.R , , 11-1 ST. F . -41-1,-L /8. 09 r- =/I r- h 1055.25 S.F. NET A. H. UNIT B j --- .... -- . A. H. UNIT D Rvvf r y-J -[//\ 'r DECK D.R. 1055.25 S.F. NET p v=IL r Ill Ji ---1.-.Ii# --1-- - Lr-r ----- (~C ') __.- DECK D.R. '12/ *V NE, -Ar 1--cl-f- .1 f. 'I: B.R. B.R. ~:~ ---1·~2 =1 t. 4 . 4 OPEN , ROOF jf L.R. L.R. 3% 1 -- CLO. P 5 :UP : ~ 1 i B. B.R. r fr ,=-- OPEN '-1 w F=LF -J M B. - >r ..3 ST... , f~ , DECK DECK Aol- -n ptl fr r- - < I-itiffit{ 2012.75 S.F, NET T --4, 4+1 - 6 1 4 =i. 7 1 1 / B.R. -~ ~ BR FREE MARKET UNIT --1 ROOF B. ROOF ) -1 L 4 - 7 1 11 L.R./D.R. UP ' [7 1 - DECK / A 1 11 -L -- 4 1 L - _ it --1 , ROOF i ~ -- lEi -- L-- M 1 1 # .1 1 I i i i r-Th. 0 0 0 e PA.j M.1 ~ DRAWING /-1 SECOND LEVEL PLAN /--1 THIRD LEVEL PLAN ~ FLOORPLANS (1) (2) I 143" -1'-0" -) 78" -1'-0'1 X Ul A. H. UNIT A 1058.25 S.F. A. H. UNIT C 1058.25 S.F. A. H. UNIT B 1055.25 S.F. A. H. UNIT D 1055.25 S.F. U JOB NO. 9521 -- FREE MARKET UNIT 2025.70 S.F. WALLS /CIRC./MECH. 830.69 S.F. ~- DATE 7-26-95 2 WALLS /CIRC./MECH. 1542.36 S.F. € U --J SHEET NO. C- \ al 12. 43.1 A2.2 . U I SHEET OF NORTH -ift > E. COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS bi-049 S1331IHI)kIV 3=IdINNAD Sllkir 'HZ) NOI1VAONEIkl SISI 9Z05 6/EOE :)(¥3 * 0696-5ZQ€0£ 1-131 * LW 8 00 143dS¥. 10 £ EllnS * 3/W NVWAH .LS¥3 OES Ze 33019 A311¥ 'N '9 'W'l 9101 ZZ/EOE :XV=l * 9EZE-9ZZ/EOE :3131 * SEM.9 00 '30111A1131 * '3/\V OC]¥30100 '3 OZE OCIVMoloo N3dSV'3nN3AV SNINdOH lS¥3 901~ el J Ca 0 9 . 0 01 0 0 1 U 1 1 EQUIP ROOF toP 1__ 0 11 1- U U ROOF 1 UNE OF WALU,BELOW r------ +--- LINE OF WALL BELOW C 6. ---- DECK I _._.-IIi '32 BELOW 1 1--p.------ 1 ROOF i i BELOW i di .- 1 i DECK BELOW ._ _- --- 1 ROOF BELOW 1 , 1 , 1 L-1 DECK BELOW i 1 ROOF BELOW 1-- - -1 1 -- i 1 1 6 0 A4.1 - DRAWING - ROOF PLAN m ---- (1) - FLOOR PLAINS - 78" -1'-0" X Ill Z ~ JOB NO. 9521 ~- DATE 7-26-95 U J SHEET NO. 0- teK J .'fl .AE '3% 4.-21 At'· I 2.: ..#r..; U A2,3 I SHEET OF 1- NORTH c COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS r· inrn'Irt=\.Of)1·\00;04=~Dll_,imn ...1:,1. OC__UY. S13311HDNV 33=!INNflE) S3121VHD NOI1VAONBM SISI 9Zos--SZMOE :X¥:1 * 06SS-SZGEOE :3131 * LWLe 03 'NHdS¥ * LOE EllfIS . '3AV NVWAH 15¥3 019 8 33018 *311¥ 'N 9 'IN'l S1O1 Z996-9ZZ/£0£ XV:l * WEZE-924/EOE :3131 * SE#Le 00 '3013[11131 * '3AV 0CIVM0100 3 OZZ 00¥30103 N3dSV'3AN3AV SNI>IdOH 1SV3 901:, 1. 1'r -' ~0 454*NIT.22 .:4- I- IT'--T'4*,1-'.1 12rhi- - 43Zr-1.-3 *v_.- .2 .~1.11 .~ . - -I ..t'-irt,-0.2/bt··,3 -·· 4:-2·14 *t--:/2/2/4 -.- ..,* L- .-I ~~~~7.4- r--1--n 7 PEI F771 [ 4- 4 - ..4 1- 1 P 1- ]-1 - i--1 I -3 _, FIi *23-J*.p I.Z=re- :7--1.-fi.«6- -2.1-4-42.1.- t-·„ i~~ y _'.7·0 - P -fit , frfffi»F€GT.,Il- I - p.-. - -- T. - + - - --- ' -li -/' ' '' ' ull 4. 1 I ... 4 U ' IiI 4 1111'P :1111'j' p 41 'll-*r-11 r - - - - 1 - ~1 1.1 1- n 1 111 ILI2 -- ~ -- 2.2- 11 4 1 1.. ..17 1 1 - - -- 0 1-1*...195 U - -- A =1 - 1'' u . I !3*: - -1. A - , 1 1 4-1 4"-4 - iti-r- , I -1:rn:·tuiyar--u-:ruc=+ . -7 " - \ 1 114. - .. - - - ... 4.- ., L -It-021 _ICI r'l -- 3 1 - e -4 - 01 54 41 111.lir . ,11-LD ~1 . -2¥'. 7 . 6 ... -- Er . n. - - :12«4IHIL-1 Col JI ··~ r ' 7-7 +~1 Ir 1 4 7 ..1-1 . FOX PHOTO 3 i *09 2- .2.9 ./=1= . u -A- 6 1- + tr-21 -2 . .- 1 1 1 BUILDING - 4 i=.L~% I: # I '-Uk n. .1 L_._L_J ~- .e NOW SHOWING PHAROAH'S RETURN 4» E . I--L 1 0 0 1 7 F-- 1,0 1~ - 1 -7 9 22*61.. L. .IT. 5- j F/RE STATION ~ r.·9 4 it ··g a · A--3- a +1- 21 3 7-1 Ft-2.01 ·· · 1.4-2- 4:irhi:~,.. r 1,1 , ..T . ~·-- L--_==·-5 , 1- -- _ - SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION - SOUTH ELEVATION C 3 - (1- 1 -) /£.IM...... 02 6 16 02 6 16 - ._u_ -1- 1- 4-1:-t- -- = =b·~butr=>=~ - . - = «=1 1 --L"L.,411.-LU-7-Li-LT~-43., ...,1-„22.--9 1.~_:_.2-_L_ L......p* - . . .1 1 --I 1 I -1-FLpi-rTi7---1-L_-.+1_L_L ir_„ 7-17 1 Ill -* 1 ·T»1-9 1 -- 1 1 1 1 4 37~~iet«i=- 1-4*I Nt_~r~7-~4 1 • T--1--4. 9 3.942[4-Il-r 11.0.497:..5 1 7-= 4,3.-79717-tIt[tII>~Jft©[ITfuX-Ell».CIP-12 7421-fic 4 - :--- --1- L --, . , u-,1-~-- .r 4, 94 7 1=3; tcm.11191 4 1 » 1 Ual.-tk" '...rht --r-%·-r-T~T~~1~Trs/12/-2222142- '-"*- -~~ 71142 9, FT-7 - -1 L , 91 -13 565vz~IfT-Z'-IOU 7INrt-.1-02,~ 4-I 4 1 -' U. -1.VULT-F- 1-el .7 1 -- _i2241.31,1112- 1-~ *-ES1fEiL.-~~-~--i. .i.,-1.-' Tl_ ' Th·-·'-1 . ' liLi - T1 /E731Tt- U-Z -r--'T= -' U T. . 1-1- -~_~-, 1~~1-,_L-~-L-~_L,_,_L-i=.--, 4.-1-r --r-1-~_1-r~-----ri . I-~- - , 14.13 . r•·• - , T-~T~ S-u-LifI~cE.42[4411- 7.1 '.-.=UIL--2 1 &. - L,1- 91,--.jir)4:T.AT,AIOUL;IFF»EAS-_I_- 1 --- - r -1 r. r - 11 1 5-I, -u:~rkEl fL, I r.i 'vil.Ef.U.~.-r* 1_1-*7, 1 -1-22ff.49-3-14-i - 4472. 2 I * 7-IL r· 1-L..4.Lr- 7 1--LT-LT-1 -- ~ 14 I _ _ 14 „t/3-,IL -_ -1 P ] _L-4 .- -- 1 1 .9 -1.14 4-VIEr. ~1-tiL .._21- 213 --,~_127_I-£.r*-1-~T-~L 7-1.-„-.r--1.... - -... -r.LT-AT_..1-£-1 11-4 - .I r I LTAI«Til-LT 7-1.22231TiTiTili 1 ~ L ., r 1 4 --r~-r ' T.J---'-1 tif--J--T-*--~-1--- --t -~-1-7-7-i . .....1*EIZIP/sial-1 Le -T--1T--- 77--r---- -r· -r. 1%15 . ~ I , 1 , ---r-.!- - -EktmATION--tt_97.-ne.rb rh-LT-r-r- IL-1 L i_ . 1- 1 -7 - 1 TITJ__I-~1 -. 1 - i T-1 1 1, 14. 7 ¥ 1 -2522246*f-72 -7-1.- 4 . T_._Lp.....1 ,-; - .71- ./ 1 1 <+4f--r - -r--~-«~' ~ '--7-r-1 '4=I - 0 7- 1 . .1 1 #. . 97 -7-- --71 » T-01*t -r- _ -_ --- 7- T Alr-. 1 1-+- I T , 1[1 2--_41 r/--·4-t·-~lr-14=-542u coll. =rER=A~=~~ 17.92Iri/_IX©t*EZE©*: i It 1 . 1 IT- - 1 . 6 ~ ~ ELEVAT IONS Z1 r-*31 1+_ 1-T 1.1_L.J T-LT -1 r.-r-1-1-rl.1-rl-1 -042-947%4- 1 6 -K 1---I).-%--*dil.~~ 1 ~-e-----r·--~ ·~T-•-r---r' -•~~-r-L-r-4-1-.r=-r·»~r-r4~-'-_1, 4 v-,w - .L. 4-*+-4 '~- .T cr- r„-L., -1-r=--r--r »-r-4·4-4-'-r-r-r --1-r "i·· 1- 1 -1 @ L---- 1 .7-L-r=-1-=-r-LT-'-tr·-~-M-J~-»-T-~~~T71--r-T-'- ---- ZI----- I I. - 1 . L; 1JOB NO. 9521 - EAST ELEVATION < C 2 - U- j ~ SHEET NO. ~ a-1 0 2 6 16 a- · A3.1 U all ~ ~-SHEET OF _j c COPYRIGHT CHARLES aJNNIFFE ARCHITECTS S133-LIHONV 333!NNAE) SH-INVHD NOIJLVAON3>I SISI 9£05-SZ6/EOE :XY:1 . 06SS-5Z6/EOE :3131 * 11919 03 'NBdS¥ * LOE EllfIS . 3/\V NIVWAH 15¥3 015 29 33019 A311¥ 'N '9 'M'l 5101 Z956-9ZZ/£0E :XY:j * 8EZE-BED€0€ 3131 * SEKLA O) '3(]13(11-131 * '3AV OC]¥30100 3 0ZZ 00¥30100 N3dSV'3nN3AV SNI>IdOH 1SV3 90* ~3 dE!**;P ~7'02,&14 ·:ic"·e.~Al'4*% 54773 . . 1 6 152263-Ek ~ --E~.A-FEIEs -~.--fr ---m-E-7-0 .-- -,- r r.- 16 r r 1------ 1-1---.....10·1'41-r- ---- 11'111 - --- ---------- O -------- lilli' 1 j 111111 1 UILU.,_---------------1--- - 1 --------- +- I ------ -- - -1- - i ----- I --- -- ------- I _________.-__1 - ------------------- m r- 1-2 ---------------------- ---- -4----- m ----------- - - - -a ------- ----------- - - ---1-- - --- - +-------- - - -1- - - ----+---- ---1- --- --- -- , 1 - --- -1-___ -7----------- r- 1 -4 ' 1-1 4 - 174- _0 -4 'J 4 rl \ *Xy W 4- - niA lilli 1111I lilli -- I - , --- I.I ILL . ~-- - . .- I -- 1 ----I -I.li ---- - - r --- - - - - - -, - R--4 1116_,0- -1--'- yip-t/IfuEE-CIL-LE»NE-3- I=-3-2-2- 1-·------- -- k ----.Wil- 244%154-1---24<21#.flff ---------- ~ _424--plf---mitift _1_ ---- - ---- ---1 -1- - 1-- -- -- 9-294 1 -1 U *«-4 44 --I - -t- -=I -- k '_- _ I- - '~ --it--TI>UEZINIZE-F·-·· ---- - -- ----------- 214-6--2-1 ,--/:·4{ Xlf' 1 . 2--- -t--41- 41---P--· DJ- --1---- 4-4 --1 ----------------- F.1.N-=Litrit-42-*-2.J 1 .1 ---- ...0--lf-- 4 Jui. 1 A-_E= rit=*.ifil . -21-4-1-2.22_Il-_-14 ' *21!I - i--4 tir 1 · 1.t H r N ri 1-2 1- x. IEE:1 1 - ./6.1,1.' H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT I E 1 .1 RE ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 00 E mi I. - ---- --- 1 ------------ 1 - ---- . - T ---- --- \1111 1 1 21 1 1 1 1 1 - -- 3---3=n L E- -------t - 1 - 4Uir -4 - r -4- - ---------------- ------- , 2 --1 - 12-5-12---1 ELEELE=LE-_31---41211-1- 229*t----*--- r --- - -- -Ii------ - --- - 7 .-1{-EN·'1 14.-__1 3, Re - - 2Z 9 1 el) 2 00 j C Al Ell'll 1 LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. * SUITE 30I * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 303925-5590 * FAX: 303925-5076 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE. * TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 303/728-3738 * FAX: 301728-9567 t¢ 0, ·P: 6661 92 trip ual)-2EPI€96\I296\91,08[030I0 NOI1VA313 1S3M FIRE STATION 1 71- 4 9L *~1 1 Dz¢ 010Hd X03 t+91*er BUILDING FOX PHOTO SDill,·021¥ 3*INNAD SmvH) 1 H913*303 0 ON 133HS IlllI1 111111 1 11 1 11'llili 11 1 LE56 'ON 801 i · I . 1 43 -0 . 40/17 I r 0 H -1 1 1 1 0 1 I m 1 ' Z 1 I - 1~m« f1 CK JO i K g It J 0 0 1 1-,1 J i CD . C C) 1 I 1 6 ~ 1 1 1 1103_- thfirl.r -· · i E . ·i '. a##-5 -511! 1 -4 .. 1 - - 1 m 1 -2 L- - 2 1+ P 1 lilill 14---=.= I --„=11[ 426 112~til -r-n T n 1 1 -4 lillil 344 -1,0. 9 E lilli, 1 1 1 E.<-' _-.fL -110 rn 1 Idt-3-<JI=*Ez--=-=22 1 »flE*-f-~3- > 1 1 1--- -- -- 1. ---- -' f 4.--- -iI----i----V =41= -1 0 11 ]1 --1 0 8- 4 -4 fr & -3--I I-_-3---I- 2 - , -==m h _._1 r 11 L.4 -- T-*72-= -3.<f · 1 L ---- 1-6 i 9,/ 7- E-I-X-3 Lt-- 4 ---10 4-0 #fl-:~a -Jj~--I- 12 2 24--41 91: 1 1 ' -9 -.1-1 ' 64KArtramE -1. 7 -- - ~- --- 1 ! 1 * 1'. r.trtNft:Ul -2- r - - ..9 .11:UNWI -r·.-- - --· ' 44iI Uttlt 14 4 '14 ' · ' tE- L 2. . - blt ' -Li 2[1-1 04 0 r -ne/j 1-Itti V '~ '44 O L T <412 - 7 1 7 1 -2. E ni -A 1 k-" h 00'- 1 :-m#-1 0 L_ L ~J.. fi'.th r • H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1 1 93. 82 ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 00 5 m: 12,(~ / 4 -1 11 1 11 »lt- 11#*4~'~~~Iln ~-t 2 10 !*1* 0 7 1 6 ie 1 - N I N ., 0 & 7 1 --1 lai . 1 - r..Ill L. 1 121 N ' LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. * SUITE 301 * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 303/925-5590 * FAX: 303,925-5076 I if 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE. * TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 303/728-3738 * FAX: 303/728-9567 .74.'r.& ALLEY NOI103S DNIC)1IAEI H33~1 H03~1 HSVE!1 »*NOO C L BUILDING SECTION ld¥ DSH 3=IV 13¥ DSH 3=1¥ AFF. HSG. APT AFF. HSG. APT DECK 8 831¥3H1 39¥8019 r\IAN)ld FREE MARKET UNI- NOI103POkld 18801 PROJECTION PROJECTION PUBLIC TOILETS PLENUM 5133 11108¥ 3ddINNn) SmMO L.tv b;;9 -9»1.-7.E . -9,1 Mlx i· i 2·- 1E-- ' 3 -3" 7~ - f---9-Fr . ...f:,5. 71.Ar ·3'ft<fil#... 1«,9:,fi . 42 ..4 1 . .. . 43 -Cr I 2 0 {1 - - -1 C) D L L.' . - ==47 7 C 11 h_ I I El 1 ZE 4\ -u Ll 0 m % 0-21 I d 0 k -r r 1 1 1 1 -0 I O 8 H.P.C. APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1 - 6 5215 P 0 ISIS RENOVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS OO i M N* j m ~17' 9 4 2 - 210 31 . 1 9 -i 4 - ::'-i ~ 6.% . 1 1 LOTS L,M, & N, ALLEY BLOCK 87 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. * SUITE 301 * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 303/925-5590 * FAX: 303/925-5076 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, ASPEN COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE. * TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 303/728-3738 * FAX: 303/728-9567 . I BUILDING SECTION FIRE STATION STORAGE THEATER C THEATER B PROJECTION AFF. HSG.~f g W AFF. HS»APT ~f pRoJEcTIO 4444% ROOF THEATER D PROJECTION ON 133HS 1* -1 -