The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.414 N 1st St.HPC 7-97- 414 n. first st. 1997 4 V.1 93 Â£ 1).t Z>* (ahâ‚¬, UPE 7- 47 <8122 1/\ I. P-51 H P ~1 0/ i CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION CON[~CISSION DATE RECEIVED: 3/18/97 CASE 4 HPC 7-97 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL D # 2735-124- 18-005 PROJECT NAME: 414 North First St. HPC RdÂ·.iew Project Address: sanne .APPLICANT: J. Lewis Address/Phone: 414 North First Stâ€ž Aspen OWNER: same Address/Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: Ememann Address/Phone: RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant Other Name./Address: PL.ANNING FEE: 6600 4 .APPS RECEIVED FEE RECEIVED: S600 = PLATS RECEIVED ' GIS DISK RECEIVED: TYPE OF APPLICATION:Minor Developmen Review Body Meeting Date Public Hearing ? HPC Eves E]No PaZ i EIYes CINo I ! CC CYes ENo CC i End reading) f E]Yes E]No | REFERRALS: E City Attorney E Zoning E Environmental Health E City Engineer E Housing E Parks E Planning C Other: C Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 City Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63850-041 Deposit Flat Fee . 1- -63860-043 HPC -63885-268 Public Right-of-Wav -63875-046 Zoning & Sign Permit -MR011 Use Tax 10000457100-383 Park Dedication 15000-63050180 AH Commercial 15000-63065-482 AH Residential County Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63800-033 Deposit -63805-034 Flar Fee -63820-037 onin -63325-033 Board of Adjustment Referral Fees: 00113-63810,133 Ccurin' Encineer 00115-63340-163 Cir? Engineer 62023-633-10-190 Hous ing 0012543340-205 Environmental Health 00113-63815-036 County Clerk 001]3-63812-212 Wildlife Officer Sales: 00113-63830-039 County Code -69000-145 py Fees -Â· Other Total 6'77. r,Â·-- : . Name Date: 9 1 9- Check: Address: Project-2.-..... Case No: = Phone No. of Copies - (1<-4 J MEMORANDEM . '1/ fI '1 TO: Stan Clauson. Communic-- De'.tiopment Director 1. \ FROM: . Amy Guthrie. Histeric ?reser.-ation Officer - u f 51. 3-1 - ~ RE: P.'O.L.E. House. 412 N. First Sueer DATE: March 16. 1998 Final approval was eranted for the HPC --Significant Development Review" of 414 N. First Street on Februan' 1 1. 1998. The following section of tile Land Use Code addresses appeals of decisions made by the Historic Preservation Commission. 26.72.040 Appeal and call up. -; - -rof ../7 A. Any ac:ion. oy .ne .-_. - .' . inproving, approving Â·.vith conditions. or disapproving a developmenr order or sliscenaing acrion on a demolirion. parrial demolition. off-site relocation. or on-sire reioceion application or in raring a structure on the invenrory of hisroric sites and grric:ures may be appealed [o the city council by the applicant or a landowner -.virhin :hree huncired (300) feet of the subject property within thirty (30) days of rhe decision. The reasons for the appeal shall be stated in writing. The city council may also call up for review any decision of the HPC approving, disapproving, or suspending action on a demolition, partial demolition. Of-site relocation, or on-site reiocation of any structure on the inventory of historic sites and structures by serving wrirten notice on the HPC within fourteen (14) days of the HPC's decision and notifying the applicanr of The call up. B. Within thirty (30) days after the date of a decision by the HPC which is appealed or called up by the citv councit. the council shall hold a public hearing after publishing notice pursuanr ro Section 26.32.060 (E)(3)(a). C. The city council shall consider the application on the record established before the HPC. The city council shall afirm the decision of the HPC unless the city council shall determine that there was an abuse of discretion. or a denial of due process by the HPC. Upon determining :har there was an abuse of discretion or denial of due process, the city council shall be authorized to take such action as it shall deem necessary to remedy said situation. including but not limited to reversing the decision, altering the conditions of approval. changing the length of time during which action on a demolition, partial demolition, 05-site relocation, or on-site relocation application has been suspended or the terms of the suspension. or remanding the application to HPC for rehearing. SUMMARY: The appeal period for City Council or an adjacent land owner has passed. The Ernemann Group Architects PO Box 4602 Aspen. Colcraco 8161 1 970.925.=co ; July 22,1996 Ms. Amy Amidon. Historic Preservation Officer ~ City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Paepcke - Lewis/Posada House, 414 North First Street, Aspen Colorado Dear Amy: I spoke with Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada today concerning their 414 North First Street project and our next HPC work session scheduled for this coming Wednesday, July 24. Both Mr. Lewis and Mr. Posada are very much committed to being active participants in the process of planning the future of the Paepcke House, and as such would like to be present for our next, and perhaps last, preliminary work session with the HPC. As they will be travelling this coming Wednesday, and therefore will be unable to attend, they regrettabiy have asked that we be removed from the HPC agenda and that we be rescheduled for the next available meeting. In addition, I would like to add that during their recent absence from Aspen, Messrs. Lewis and Posada have received my reports of our progress with the HPC with considerable enthusiasm. They are locking forward to resuming their active participation with that same enthusiasm. Sincerely. -WA . C.-- ......._-. -. Ernemann, AIA j Lewis/Posada House - 414 North First Street. Aspen. Colorado 1. COMMENTS, CONCEPTS & IDEAS FROM HPC WORK SESSIONS A. The house's history is one of evolution - it should continue to evolve. B. The original house represented mining wealth (Lyster era), then it evolved to represent general , - entrepeneurial wealth and cattle ranching wealth (Brown era) when it was used primarily as a summer house, and most recently 1 has represented industrial-corporate wealth and philanthropy toward the arts and cultural endeavors (Paepcke). Now it should evolve again in a post-techno era to represent new owner's ideals, and a new lifestyle - a new vision. C. Buildings tell stories - selec: and retain those elements that tell the story. D. Retain its presence as an 'estate ' E. Consider this era to be one of ecology and recycling. Could this be the basis for the next evolution of the house? F. Consider a thematic approach of moving backward in time toward the original structure and then link it to something currer,I. Return the house to 1888 form - bungalow with porch and eaves at one story, and add a new contemporary structure to east side of existing structure. G. The massive west elevaticn represents the public image of the house - substantial and private. This elevation should be preser,ed. The secrecy of the garden is maintained by the house acting as a screen. H. The house is turned sideways to First Street and Triangle Park. It has no dialogue with the public way. It addresses a no longer existent street. 1. Keep the low wall, fence, and entry treilis on the First Street side. J. Keep the garage/carriage house. K. Consider extending Lake Avenue as vehicle access to front entry. L Impertant not to let the myth of the house's prior life be a cause for preservation of something that is otherwise undistinguished as architectural work. M. Seek another method of keeping the Paepcke influence without the literal preservation. N. There is no sense in preserving something that is not of value. 0. It is valid to let the house go to transformation. P. Preservation should regard authenticity. That which is not authentic may not be worthy of preservation. Q. Keep the Bayer 'Kitschy German Details" R. Regard the house's scale and character in relationship to the others fronting on Triangle Park, especially the Shaw House. S. The house is no longer 'Victorian' in form or detail. Should it be preserved as is when it is an anomoly with regard to its Victorian neighbors, or is its differentness that which provides its importance. T. Con&ider placing a landmark plague out front to convey the story of house's evolution. U. What would Mrs. Paepcke think? C JAM_Ix vur \ D., UÂ· t 11. WHERE WE GO FROM HERE? A. Select positions relative to three polar extremes. Restore Present House as :t Exists Today Return House Demolish House to 1888 Form and Build Anew B. SELECT AND RANK SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF THE PROPERTY WORTHY OF RETENTION. 1. GARAGE'STUDIO a. 2 car or 3 car form b. Preserve form and materials (except roof materials) 2. GENERAL FORM OF HOUSE a. Overall mass: (1) retain existing, or (2) return to 1888 form, or (31 something in between then and now, or (4) start anew) b. West Facade c. East Facadi d. North Facade and North Entry e. Link to Garage f. Roof 3. MATERIALS AND DETAILS a. Roof: Metal 'Bermucla Shingles" b. Walls: Stucco. Horizontal Wood Siding, Wood Shingles c. Openings: Size, Scale, Form d, Trim: Horizontal and Vertical Boards between Materials, Porches, Railings, RoofBrackets and Rafter Ends e. Chimneys (Brick) 4. SITE a. Wall, Gates and Entry Trellis along West (First St.) Elevation b. Gardens c. BBQ Deck d. Large Trees on First St. Elevation e. Carriage Step on First St. + 1.2- 1 l. \ f HPC mernbers individually invent a concept/- anonymously write it down and submit, OR HPC collectively invent a concept or a recommendation. \Atz> 9 ble fli qi: )-: 66 8,4 REk, 2'4, '~f~(Â»1 ola'(/0.0 . ,aÂ«jo ~ 3 Of>lt,\LOul / 7,2/9\Z~c,2,- - ~ <St<:-9 <342 ~610 70~jll Â«sA7lt G- . 11,1 jonathan Lewis & Associates j - w{.4 June 28, 1996 Ms. Amy Amidon City of Aspen Cornmunity Development Department 130 South Galena Aspen. Colorado 81611 Dear Amy: Both Roberto and I are sorry that we were unable to attend the June 26, 1996 HPC meeting. We did, however, receive a complete overview of the meeting from Michael Ernemann. We were discouraged to hear that some members of the committee had not yet completed the Historical Preservation Review Guidelines prescribed by the National Endowment for Historic Preservation. We appeal to you to continue to encourage all ofthe members ofthe HPC to undertake this exercise. We agree with your assessment of the exercises value and the need to avoid subjective issues in our combined effort to accomplish serious and valuable historic preservation at 414 North First Street. Thank you very much for your leadership. We look forward to seeing you towards the end of July. Sincerely, ri21-- --T--779 Jonathan Lewis CC: Michael Ernemann Andy Hecht 4649 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 304 Coral Gables. Florida 33146-2118 (305) 669-8990 Â· FAX (305) 666-9549 1 7 PRE SERVATION BMT#FlfgMin 0,1//451/127.54~AM/d.%4/./. rl / BRIEFS Architectural Character: 7*02:*Â¥M=,5:0*1 *2===SZ'*A-W, 952 QI Idenillying the Visual Aspects of =gism~ir~MI Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character Lee H. Nelson, F.AIA U. S. Depar=ent of the Interior National Park Service Preservation Assistance Division The Secetar.Â· ot the Inter.or': "Scandarcs for Histor.c 7:eserÂ·'acon 7-olects ' embocv :wo .mccriant coals: 3 :he preser:anon or histor:c mater:ais ind. 2 :he :reser.Â·anon or i butic:r:z s =:st:no:saing (narac:er. :Â·.Â·er. oid :cudir:g :s ur.!cue. with :ts own tdertric:' I and :rs own cist:ne:ve c:arac:er. Charac:er refers :0 ail -nese visual ascec:s ana chysical :eacures :Mar corner.se :ne accearance or ever, 7,:SIC:.c cutiding, C>.arac:25-Â·derining elemen:s r.c:Â·=e :ne ove:111 :hace or :ne Dutiding, Ks ma:er: ais, crartsmansnic. tecorative i detatis. .:er:or soaces and -ear'ures. ls Â·.veil .ls :he Â·Â·accus -spec= st :ts site ind environment. 2 i ne purpose or :his 3rier is to heip the :owner or :ne substitute for develooing in understanding about the art,irec: ident* those rearures or dier.ents :hat zive significance of an histcr.: building and :he district in the building its visual charac:er and that she'ici be :aker. which it is .ocatec. into iC.0'Unt in order to preser.-e them to :he max- If the various materials, features and scares that Jive 3 imum extent =ossicie. a building its visual character are not recoenized and There are different Â·,vavs ot understanding aid preserved, then essential aspects or its. character mav ce buildings. They Can be seen as examcies Or specjic damaged in the prccess-of change. building :ypes, :vhich are uscailv relited to a bu:idir. g s A budding' s character can be irreversibiy darnaged or funcnon. sucn as schoois. cour:houses or churches. changed in mar.v :vavs. for example, ov inappropriate Buildings can be studied as examples of using speclic repointing ot the brickwork, by temoval of a distinctive materiais such as=concrete. wood, steel, or limestorte. side porch, by changes :o the window sash, by They can also be considered as examples of art changes to the setting around the building, by changes historical per.od. which is often :eiated to a specific ar- to :he major Zoorn arrangerner.IS, by the introduction of ciirecturi sucie, such as Gothic Re..ival farit.ouses. an atrium, by paints.g previously unpaintea wood- one-stor: burtgalows, or Art Deco apartment buildings. work. etc. ./ There are many other facets of an histor:c building besides its fur.ctional type, its materiais or Consm=Cton A Three-Step Process to Identify A or style that contribute to its historic cualiries or Building's Visual Character signuicance. Some or these qualities are feetings :crl- veved bv Che sense of nine and place or in 3*uudir.Es This Brief outlines a three-steo agoroach that can be . asiociated :vith events Or peopie. A complete used by anvone -0 }dencr.' thosj materiais, features understanding or any procern *nay require dccumen- and spaces that cor.mbute to the visuai character of a tarv research about its stvie, construction. fur.cr.or.. ics butiding. This acorcach involves first examining the furnishings or contents; knowledge about :he or:gr.ai building from aiar to understand ics overall setting and builder, owners. and later occupants: and knowiedge architec:ural context: therl moving up very close to ao- about the evolutionary history of the buittling. aver. predate its materials and the cartsmanship and surface though butidings may be of historic, rather char. ar- finishes evident in these materials; and then going into chitecturi significance, it is their tangible eler.ents :hat and through the building to perceive those spaces, embody its simificance for association with scecific rooms and details that comprise irs interior visual character. events or persons and it is those tangible demen:s both in the exterior and interior -th-at should be presen'ed. Step 1: Identify the Overall Visual Aspects Therefore, the approach taken in this Brief is imited - to identif-,ing :hose visual and tangible aspects of :he Identifying the overil visual character of a building is historic building. While this may aid in the planning nothing more than looking at its distinguishing physici process for Carr,-Ing out any ongoing or rterv use or aspects without focusing on its details. The major con- restoracon of :he building, thls approach is not a tributors to a building's overall character are embodied 1 in trie ger.eral aspecs of its jetting; the shape ot the In part. this is because jo much of the exterior can be building; its mof and roof features, such as chirrmevs or seen at one time and it is possible to grasp its essential cupolas; the various Frojections on :he building, such as character rather quickly. To understand the interior porches or bay windows; the Â·recesses or voids in a character, it is necessary to move through the spaces building, such as open gaileries, arcades, or recessed one at a time. Whlie it is aot difficult to perceive the :aicortles: the ovenmgs-for '.vindows and door.vays; and characer of one individual room. it becomes more dif- < finally the various exter:or ,natenais that contribute :o ficult to deal with spaces that are interconnected and the buiiding' s character. Step one invoives looking at interrelated. Sometimes, as in office buildings, it is the the building from a distance to understand the vestibules or lobbies or corridors that are important to character of its site ind setting, and it involves Â·.vaik:ng the interior character of the buiiding. With other groups around :he building where that is possibie. Some of buildings the visual qualities of the interior are buildings will have one or more side that are more related to the plan of the building, as in a church with important than the others because they are more highiy its aidal plan creating a flarrow :unnel-like space which visible. This does not mean that :he rear of :he obviously has a different character than an open space butiding is or 70 vaiue whatever but it simpiy reans like a sports pavilion. Thus the shape of the space may that it is :ess imporant to the overail character. C n :he be an essential part of its characer. With some other hand, the rear may have an Interesting 'back buildings it is possible to perceive that there is a visual porch or offer a orivate garden space or some other Unkage in a sequence ot spaces, as in a hotel, from the aspect that may contnbure :o the Visual characer. Such lobby to the grand staircase to the bailroom. Cosing off a gerterai approach to looking at the building and site the openings ber,veen :hose spaces would change :he will provide i better understanding of its overail cnaracter from visuaily :inked spaces to a series of character :vithout havine to resor. to an infiniceiv long closed spaces. For exampie, In a house :hat has a front checklist ot its possibie features and de:Es. Regariess and bad< parior linked :vith an open archway, the 7,vo of whether a building is comciicared or :eiariveiy plain. rooms are perceived together, and this visual relation- it is these broad categories that concribute to in ship is par: or the character of :he buiiding. To close understanding or the overaLl :harn:ter :a... -- 0.-I. .... off :he ocer, arch:vav Â·.vouid change the :haraczer or scedics of architec=:i :earj u, -U-.. Eis .4 ..AL.-6.6 â€¢ =.2 ....6- such a residence. -O. --â€¢ rn / .- :-9 .-â€¢ c- - r ,- their pronies. .re knpor:ance or :aterior reanres arld rinishes -0 the ch<racter or :he 'outiding should not be overlooked. Step Z: Identify the Visual Character at Close Range in relanvely suncie rooms, che orimarv visual ascects Steo two j'.'cives lookine at :he bluding ir dcse :anze mav ce r. reatures such as fireciace manceis. ligh=ng -- or arrn 5 leng:n. .Â¥ l ..... I- a. - rossicie zo see ail me sur- :ixtures or :vcoden floors. In some rooms, :he absoiute r.....0 'I ' ace qualides or :he materials, such as thetrÂ· trior ir,c plainness Ls the charac:er-Â·derining aspect of :he triter:or. '6. 6 ire, or Sunce EVIder.ce or crtsmanshio or lee. 21 . So-ciled secondarv scaces also mav be :moortant in ,ome instances. :he visual charac:er is the -ocÂ·,i. If --O ...W &.6 . .. - their own wav, trorn :he stand=oint of historv or jux:aposition or materials that are contrascr=r.' --------- because or the tamiiv acnines char occu=ed in :hose . in their color and texture. The surface cualicies ot :he rooms.Such secondar,Â· spaces, while perhaps mater:ais mav be unoortant because :hev imcart :he historically signlficant, are riot usually perceived as im- very sense of Craftsmanship arld aee that distr.r=Shes portant to the visual character of the building. Thus we * 4 rÂ·- 1 historic buildings from other butidings. curcnermore, do not :ake them into account inÂ·the visual manv of these doseÂ·up qualities can be easiiv damaged ' wlderstanding of the buiiaing. or obscured bv work that itfects those surfaces. zx- ampies of tilis couid include cair.ting pre'.iousiv Url- Conclusion painted mason.ry. rotarv disk sanding of smooth svc(xi stding :o remove oaint, aorasive clearing or zooied Using this :hree-step acoroach, it is possible to conduct stonework. or re.oirl:ing reddish mortar jor,ts -.vith a walk through and ideAdfy ail those eiements and grav cortiand cement. features that help define the VIsual character of the There is an almost infinite varier.' of st.ace OULICIng. In most cases, there are a number of aspects materials, textures and finishes that are pars of a about :he exterior and incenor that are important to the buudings charic.er which are frade and das@ bst. cn=acter of an historic budding. The visual emphasis of this brie. will make it cossible :o ascertain those things Step 3: Ider.tify the Visual Character of :he Interior that should be preser.Â·ed 'because their loss Or literation Spaces, Features and Finishes would diminish or destroy aspecs of che historic Perce:VIng :he charicÂ·ter of inter.or scaces carl ce character .vhether on the outside, or on the inSide of somewhat more air::cit than deaUng Â·with the exteâ‚¬or. the brinding. For sale by Â·.he Super.ntendent of Documents. U.S. Government Pnnting Office Washington, D.C. 20402 2 1 1 '' j . B .- ' Preservation Briefs 17 /:.... The Architectural Character Checklist/Questionnaire 1 Lee H. Nelson. F.ALA National Park Servic2 ~fs checkibt can be taken to the building ind used to idenÂ®, those ispects that live the building ind setting its assert=ai =Suai :ualines artd character. This aecklist consists of a series of questions that ire designed to heip in ident*ing :hose things :hat contnbute to a 'building's aance. ne rise of ~ls aecklist bvolves the three-step proess of '.ooking for: 1) the overall vist:111SpeCS. 2 the mual charac:er at dose :artge, and 3) the visual chancer x utter.cr :caces. features and finishes. Because :his is a process to kientlfv irch:rent,=1 character. it does mot address :hose intang:bie quaiities that give a Crocert, cr building cr its contents its histor:c sigruficance. :nstead this checklist is organized on :he assumption that j.:stor:c :15:1:Ecar.ce s dmbodied :rt those =7.Fbte aspecs thar inciucie the butiding': serting, its form irrd fabr.c Step One 1. Shape 4. hiections What Ls :nere foout :he form cr shace of the building that .Are :here cars or :he butiding Â·hat ire charic:er-defirting gpves the :uliding :cs :cer.er,? Ls Ine snape dist..:c..ve Le because they prclec: from the waits of the bulidir.7 ike retattert :0 :he zeighbor:ng 'Ct:lidings? I.s .t :Im Civ 1 .OW. corches, com:ces. bav :vt:ncews, or baicorties? Are :here squat box. ': :s R i :211. nar.ow building Â·.vith i :=rer turers. or :vic:ely over. arlg-r:g faves, prclectng pediments tower? s :Â·.e inace hic.ly .cr.sisterlc Â·.vith .ts me:gr:bars? Is or =Inlne,/'S ? the shave 50 :=.=tici:ec jecluse Of Â·Â·vings. or 2.15. 3: iL- Notes on rte 7:c:ec::ccs: ferences :r. he:gr... r.ac .:s :cmy:ex:r., 3 :mcor-anc :0 -:s character? .jr.verseiv. s :ne shace 50 51mcie :r clat: :ra: aading a feature .ike 1 206:11 --vouid :hartize :ha: char=:car? L. A 6 62' 42,f*--22 44, <:22 ty,--n,Â·0 4 -0 6-1 , Does r.e inace :cr.vev .5 7.:ston: iunc:ion as :7 smoke 1 - rs i StaCKS :r 5.cs? . WARCÂ·62~9=.13-444=Â·L '. ..4-ti.2, 3. Trim artd Seccrtdary Feitures rEL/Â·42 0~f:el po./c>lies Notes on r.2 =ace or Form N re juncing: Does :he =m ircu..a :he Â·.vv.:cows or iccrs contribute to :he unarac:er :f :he CU:idicÂ·z? :s there other mm on :he k...1=v/-2 1valls cr =und :ne cro,ec:6rts :hat, because or its decora-Â£'v-EL'.2- ~ -ikeÂ»Ae . yÂ·.Â£:.ut 4 2.\ 4 4-\=+ 432- v' 12 Â· - ~ l/,12>JAZ .1.1 '---C~ "ort ir coior or cat:em:ng :cr.mbu:es :c :he character or - , 'ne building? Are :here seccrid:r, features such as shutters. 03' 10Â« 2. Roor and Root Fearcres leccrative gabies. ra,iings, or exter:or wall parteis? C.(,Iat,~.S}CA Does the =ct mace cr :cs steeo tor shallow) slope :cr- Notes on :le Trim :rid Seccrtdary Features: tribu:e :o :he hiding 3 characier? Does the fcc: :har :ne roof :s highiv visible , or r.ct visibie it ail) cont:.bu:2 to :he arcnirecarai icent'.r,Â· i :he building? Are certain :cor â‚¬::p *tt~,L-+91~ vÂ£*l 910'<CO v~ 4-4- tuu,1, Set'ReÂ· ;1 features imccr:ant :o ze prorÂ·ie cr :he buticing 1931!!St :he 22Â£243vghu..2 604Â«79-, .~59Â·v'LAAE=Ji/â‚¬Lâ‚¬ sky or .cs =ac<grounc:. sucn as :=poias. muit:pte :r.imr:evs. 6. Materials tfL,eli ~LAssili vi<A kÂ·re.ec:Ac#J .ecri. doftners. cresrtng, or Â·veatnervanes? Are the :ooting 1/ maceri~is cr :he~r :ciors cr :heir .atterms (such as :attemed Do :he mater.als or combirtacon ot matenats ceptrloute to slates) more ncr:ceacte ::tan :he shace cr sic:le of :he :ccr? :he overall charac:er or the bunding as seen f:*rt a distance =ecause or :hetr :cior or pat:eming, such as broken faced Notes on :he Root ir.d Roor Feact:res: :tor.e. scailoced Â·.vall shirte:ing, rounded :ock foundation FF<w\* 1.45.20 , 4(40,9 A cot-,9 wails. boarcs and bactens, or lextured srucco? . L Notes oil 'ne Macer.ais: r>i. i,, ,RALi,2-1 (,UlÂ·=:F:Le,2,6 , 01/236,6, / 1(,D de~s. haf-(26+1 4-fÂ· 4~Â·Â·Â·(1-f-406>ut-16 S kidkt 44 slf,Â£.Cel-â‚¬ 3. Opening / 9Uue.t:34 ezzor e.'bil t..1642Â·<2 lij/,c~\.+ ld~.aviÂ·42+1 0~~~ Is there a =vthm or .attern to :he ar:ar.gement x Â·.vie.- lows Jr Nne: Dee-!79 = :he 'vails: 'ike :he :7:Â·Cm or -4-f Â·* \61 k is. Ce 12' u ' 2>2 91<:3 062, 6. 7. betting ' ~ wtncows = 1 :ac:or.Â· culicirte, or a :hree-part .virtccw :rt =-4Â£(3611 vlc.hu.4 4 Â·11 iS:Â»tov,ld..~ the fron: bav or : ctouse: or s :here a mot:ceabie -e:a[:ort- What Gre :he iscec:s N :he sert:ng that are intportant to shic ber.veert :he Â·vid:h of :he window opertings inc :ne the '/tsual character? For example. is che aiignment of Wali jcace ber.veen :he Â·.vmdch' jper.ings? Are :nere buildings Jiong a c:tv street ind their reiationship to the dist:nc:ive ece-:...Ss. :ike 1 :arge arched entranceÂ·.vay. or sidewalk :he essert::al aspec: ot :ts sett:ng? Cr, converseiv, deccrative '.mdow :in:els that xcentuate the impormcce i is :he esser.nal character de.er,dent upon the tree plantings , the Â·.vindow ocer.Ings. lor unt:sually shaped .vincotvs. or and out buildings Â·.vhtch surround :he farmhouse? [s the patterned wincow jasn. :ike small .anes or glass in the front yard importic: :o the ser::ng of the modest house? [s wincow, or zoon. :nat are :mpc::art: :0 the charac:er? .s the scec:fic site :mpor:ant o :he :emng such as betng Ort a the plaincess or :he t.vindow ocer.:ngs such that adding hilltco, alcng i river, or, is the building placed orÂ·l :he site shut:ers .r j:ng'=read tr:m wcuid :adicaily change .ts in such i wav to enhance :ts sett:rig? Is there a soe<:al reta- char:c:er? ~s :ze. .1 hier.:cr.v 'it facades that make :he tionship to the adioming streets and other bulldings? [s front Â·vincows more :moor:ant :hart :he side Â·Â·VIr,COWS? there a view? [s there fenc:ng, planting, ter.=Cing, What Jboir: Â·hose Â·wails .:heri #te absence or Â·.virtdows walkÂ·.vays or any Jther iands:=ce .spec:s that contribute to establishes ::s own <nracter? the sett:ng? dos,v 4 , aâ€¢â€¢~,i. \Aâ€¢C'L;â‚¬,42Â· l u/~ 4 Notes in :he Ccer:ing= Nctes on the Seng: <7 V vÂ· i U 3%1AZ Ej~S*' 21â‚¬.i.1 6, U i .A.- 9 TD,:2- ~-2~7 7+Lt ~log,0Â·hovic.7 Lit 44-l -e. Or->Er,u' l-l W i ~-7 47~5 4 < 4..CJ 4&,cy.zi,~1Â·~'cE>171 601 Fl:D-\40â‚¬-(/ 6,1 'S,- a,ve/ 1 01 ke' 4 , U \A u.a 4-e lm/2 - â‚¬.- 11 i<-1;p,-,1- 15-~ u.Â·cal i L \/51 l,0 , 9442 2 4 windows. hardware. wainscotting, par!elling, tr:rn. church Step Two pews. court:com bars. teller =ges. wattlrtg room bertcheS? 8. Materiais it Cose Range Notes on :he Intertor Features: Are there one or more matenals that have an inherent :ex- _- 1 ture that Conmbutes to :he close range character, such a ; . 4 1.-,-0 '1, ; 6 -' 9 srucco. exposed iggregate concete. or br.ck textured with - < verncal Fcoves? Cr materials with innerent:ciors such as 13. Sur:ace Firushes and Materiab smooth orange<ciored brick with dark spots or iron Are there surface finishes and matenais :hat can iffect the pyrites. or promlner.tly ve:ned stone. or greert ser=entine design. the coicr or the texture of the :nter.or? Are there stone? Are mere combinat:arts of mater.als. used in ;ux- water.ais and finishes or cart pracrices that conmbute :o taposition. such as several different kinds or stone. corn- the inter.or character. such as wooden parquet :loors. birtacons :f stone ind bnck. dressed stones for window checkerboard marble floors, pressed metai :ellings. fine lintels used in con junction with rough stcnes for the wail? Has :he choice :i materials Jr :he combinations Ji materials hardÂ·woods. grained doors ar marblized surfaces, or contr.buted to :he charac:er? polychrome painted surfaces. or stencilling. or wallpacer that ts important to the historic character? Are :here surface Notes on the Materills at Cose lange: finishes and mater.als :hat, because of :heir ?iainness. are impart:ng the essent:ai character of the :ater.or such as 25.r 1,01,21 1 â€ž\19'T-Uk.1 r#- uula-Â·,~t'-ta.ts,hard or :r.ght. shiny wail surfaces or piaster or giass or metal? 1 V\,54 1 5*' Ir-Â¢' 4-9-Cor U 6 L h O >1 3 7 9. Ccitt Details L l,36-4 Notes en the Surface Finishes and Mater:ais 15 there high quality bnckÂ·work :vith :tarrow mariEr Â·oints? Is :here hand-tooied or pattemed stonework? Do che wails ~ Ld Â·Ld.10'' i â€¢3' v" exhibit corefuily strack vemcai mortar ,oints ind recessed norizontai Botrits? Is :he Â·.vall :ningiework .aid Â·10 .9 pat- terms cr =ces It retain evtdence tot :ne c:rciar saw marg :r 14. Exposed Structure can the grairt of :he wooa be seen :hrough :he serri- .Are :here 5CaC25 Â·unere :he excosea :tructurai elements franscarent staln? Are :here harta sclic or hand-dressed defir.e :ze .nter:cr :haracter sucm as the exposed posts. claccoards. or machine smcorn beveied siding, or Â·Â·vccd beams, ar.c tris.25 n i church or :rain .red or jac:orÂ·? msticated :o 'ook Hke stone. ir .Ar: Deco z:gzag designs ex- Are :here morns .vt:h :ecorat:ve ':2:iing beams ; Itort- ecuted n races? imic:'=:26 in bur.galows, or excosed Â·,tzas .r. adobe Almost any evider.ce oi =lit decalis. -wherher par.dmace b.,Iidinzs: Or macnir.emace. mil controure o :he characer n 1 building :ecause k :s a mandestarion d the matemais. of ......f...... Notes m :he E:cosed -I.-I.-... the times Er. :vh:ch :rte '.vorx was dorte. anc or the :cols 1 .1 . and processes :hac :vere used. k jur:her :eriec:s :he Efecs ! 4\ 4.-â‚¬ 0,Â· 1 ,5' 1., or ::Ime, st mair.:er.ince ar.c:.or r.eglec:' 7.a[ the '3'Liding .. has rece:ved ove. :me years. Ail or :hese aspects are : cart .ms cor.ciudes*:he Three-step process i iden=ving ot the suhace :ualities :nac :re ieer. oniv it zicse zar.ge. :he visual aspects or histcr.c buildings and is :n- Notes on:he C=u: Denils: , < :ended as ar. aid :n creser.Â·ir.fr :heir =haraczer and other: discr,gu:sning .:.uatices. it Is r.ot .r.rer.dec as a means lor uncers:ar,cing :he significance of histot.cal f.- Litile A,Aa-~ \ ; #Â·1 a 0 2- procertes or discic:s, 7.or of the events or peocie 61.2.2 c, F'..ati u e L l.kE:Â£' V. -6 assoc:aced :vith :hern. Thar can oniy 'be done :hrough Step Three other k:nds or research and :nvestigation. 10. Individual Spaces taikimetr.cdology in 1982 :o discuss the use of the Secretary This Fraser/at:on 3rter was or:gir.aily deveioped as a slide .Are there ndividual rooms Jr spaces that are Emportarte -0 = or the [ater:or's Standards for Renabilitation lit relation to this building Jecouse oi thee size. heighc. proportion. fort- ,preserving :listorc c:.aric:er; ind :t Â·was ampiified and figuric:on. or :unct:on. tike :he center hailway in a house, mcdifiec :a sucaecing years to help guice preservanon or the bank loobv, or the ECICOi auditorium. or :he aecstorÂ·,maKIng, :m:tiaily for maincertance personnel .tn :he bailrcom n a hoteL or a ccurzoom :n a county cour.house? Naconal Fark Service. A mumber or =eooze conmbuted to Notes en :he Individuai Spaces: the evolut:on of :he ideas cresenced *here. Special :hanks go to Emogene Bevitt ind Cary Hume. prtmaniv for the many ana aecuent Liscussions relating to this aooroach :rt its l Ul ~-6~ t O v evoiut:Coary stages; to Marin Fram. Orttar:o Her:tage Foun- Cat:on. Toronto. :or suggesting several addit:ons zo the 11. Related Spaces and Sequences of Spaces Checklist: ind more :ecentiv, :o mv co-workers. both in Are there idioining rooms :har are visuaily ind physicily 'Washing:on and in our reg,crtai offices. es:ec:ailv Ward reiatea wtnt .ar'Le doorÂ·.vavs or ooerl aranwavs 30 :nat :mev land!. Sara 31cmencrtai, Charies Fisher. Sharon Fark. AIA, - are :erce:ved .ls retaced :coms as opposed :o separate 0 jean .:avers, -amule Mar:cne, Jusan Dynes. Michael rooms? Is chere art :mcor:ant sequence ci spaces that are Auer. Artne Cr:rnmer, Kiv Weeks, 32.sv Chittendert, reiated to eacr. otner. sucm J :he sequence from the er.:ry Patr:ck Andrus, Carol Shuil. Hugh Miller, FAIA, Ter:y wav to :he :obbv :o the stairrvay ind :o The uccer baicony Rogers. hui Alley, David Look. .AIA. Margaret F.Dirt- as :n a :heacre: or the sequence 51 3 residence :rcm the art- Donat, 3onnie Maida. Keith Everett, Thomas Keohart. :he try vest:buie :o :he hallwav :o the front partor. and on Preservar:ort Services Division. Mid-Atiarlric Region. and ' through :he :licirtg doors :o tne back partor: or the se- severti revieiver,5 :rt state creservatton Nfices. especially quence :n an ortice bulidtrti from the drury vestibuie to the Ann Haaxer. illinois: and Start Graves. A[A. Texas; for pro- lobbv :0 :he bank or elevatcrs? manuscy:or. viding very ant:d and constructive review of the Notes an the Related Spaces and Sequencis d Spaces: ints puct.CatIon .las ce,em ore:ared pursuant to :he Na- :Ionai Historic :reservation .Ac: ot :966. as amended. Com- ments on the usefulness of :his iniormation ire wejcomed and can be sent :o Mr. Nelson, Preservation Assistance 12. Interior Features Division. Nattortai Park Ser,rce. U.S. Decartment 3* the In- Are :here :nter:or features that help derine :he charac:er of ter:or. 2 0. Box 37:27, .Vashing:ort. D.C. 20013-7727. This the buildir:Â·g, such .is .ireciace mar.te!s. stair.vays and public=t:on ts rter :opvnrinted and can be reproduced balustrades. arched upent:.ys. inter:or shutters. Ing!enocks. without penalty Normal orucedures :-or c:edit :o the author 12 comices. ce:lirÂ·45 medallions. light :ixtures. balcornes. doors. and:he National Fark Sernce are apprec:aced. l_ 1,v< 1 7 The Ernemann Grouo Architects PC Box 2602 Asoen Joicracc 3161 ' 370.925 22â‚¬â‚¬ February 7.1997 Mr. Stan Clausen. Director Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Lewis/Posada House. 414 N. First Street, Aspen, Colorado Dear Stan: Many thanks for taking the time to help me with clarifications of the Aspen Land Use Regulations as they will apply to our work on the above referenced project. During our meeting on February 6 I asked about several issues that were central to confirming my understanding of the Land Use Regulations as initially established through previous work sessions with staff. As a matter of record I wish to include my notes from that meeting as follows: 1 We may retain the existing floor area in the project although it is greater than current R-6 zoning would allow. 2. The calculation of existing floor area includes habitable attic space (under roofs) and it is inclusive of all attic floor area within perimeter walls regardless of headroom. 3. The existing floor area may be reconfigured into a new building form that extends beyond the existing envelope. The additions or reconfigured building may maintain existing floor levels and non-conforming roof heights in order to correspend to the Â·a'-i--A - a B -4 *L.- - .4 .... 4 iv,-iligu purt;un, U, ul= CXiolilly uuilding (as requested by HPC in previous work session). However, the degree of existing non-conformity may not be increased by new roofs that are higher than those that are existing. The existing entry level floor (above existing basement) is at 50 in. above grade. An extension of this basement floor area below an entry level floor that is more that 18" above grademust be partially included (as calculated per Ord. 30, Sec.2 (D)) against maximum allowable floor area for the house. -- 5. The existing garage is non-conforming in that it encroaches into required setback zones. We may not extend (enlarge) the garage within setback zones without variance. 20.lot.080 (c*) 86 (be 44'T.4 Z â‚¬70 9.f. 6* kn, ac, -66( dÂ»Wop.,â€¢4 4* not wermÂ« bi M. 1-6. 90 4.f. p* 4, th IR â€¢liaÂ·Â·Â·4 W# 496 9 . . Letter to Mr. Stan Clausen February 7,1997 Page 2 99, + 96*. C qi'pk . 6 If it is intended to construct a basement below the existing garage, the garage may be temporarily removed and replaced only with HPC approval and this may require a cash bond to ensure that the garage will not be damaged in the process. 10> . lizw/be 4 4Â£4 #v 7 The existing house and garage are largely non-complying with the requirements of Ord. 30. In order to retain those components of the house as 04. * j -14* * 61 garage/carriage house. and entire west (street facing) facade), the general requested by the HPC (north non-street facing house entry, entire AL ri +W &01 Â·6 be whtÂ¥61. exempted from Ord. 30 and will be required to submit all materials for Ord. 30 non-compliance with Ord. 30 will be continued. Nevertheless we will not be review. Kindly let me know should you find any of the foregoing inconsistent with your understandings from our discussions in this regard. My staff and I are very enthusiastic about moving ahead (at long last) with this project, With this in mind we intend to review our conceptual plans with HPC inÂ·a Â·work session on February 26. I hope you will be able to be there. Sincerely, ~thael J. Ernemann A!A MJE/cav =0 r . r I . 0 RECEIVED U - --1 SEP 1 0 1997 A a Paks Department THE CrrY OF ASPEN 91 c /1 0 2 Parks Office 920-5120 672. 1 /7' TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPUCATION The following is an outline to assist in the preparadon of a tree removal permit 1) Outline/Sketch/Drawing of property to include: (please attach 2 copies) - a) Property address. b) Property boundaries. c) Locations of buildings on the property. d) Location, diameter, and species of trees on property and designate with arrows or circles which trees are to be removed. 2) S ite address 4/4 /4 0 1 57 9 TiE 57- 3) List trees to be removed, species and diameter at 4.5' above grade. /11 â€ž 71,00 BAI STLECCA(E P/AfES l'El DIA- < ;2. DIA ~ 4) Reason for Removal CCIhip Lic-r-5 uu<TM 2,1.-ceÂ¢52-0 AE-,DEVELOPMENT PLA Al f.1NB C,NSTRU OrA ott ACCECE . .~PONSTRISCRON 0*4* MLESS. CAN *49, De=az, 1~~SZOUGH AAZA (Nifâ‚¬ZZE Twe sÂ·WUECT 372225 6126 SETUP6222 5) Mitigation Plan (relocation of trees or replacement of comparable worth trees as referenced in Aspen Municipal Code Sec. 13-76, (e)). Add to Property Drawing. a) Location ofreplacement*elocation trees:%. 8 orr-; T/KE.Â£5 wiL.C. BE /'KE-.cze.9 77Â£0 b) Size and species oftrees to be reI)lacedÂ·_) TO 7-FE /12Â£2Â· 8/5/erc A,,U-LS f AIC CtE,Â·.17-Eg~.s 6) Completion Date of Project 10/1 1 7) Person responsible for project (applicant): JONATÂ»*H LIEW,15 ~AC,8â‚¬AJO PcS.904 JE-8.Â»{ cjWALEa-\ Property Owner / Name of Architect or Construction Representative 1 M N. Ff/2.57 57 920-2734 144Â·N 5601 CON57-*LOCTFC-1 920-4 55% Address & Phone Number Company name _ Phone Number - #/01 3-1 S ignature Date 0gna*L,~ Date 99 1 . , . / ' \.1 1 1 - 8) Comments: * 0* 12> Cdws[R)artc>ci * -TWee pel,Elit 7Â¢a ferearÂ¢> w 89Â¢Â¥ 00( -rvee Â¥ettlbÂ·6 4 P<*696 006% De<-iNEAED, Â¢Â£C)rE \O WaizÂ·f 60 49[622/ 1014, +00Â£95 #Vwki elf' STAky{-*M- f=*BAC <:L. 16 6 Wor fzÂ»Â¢p â‚¬95605 Â· 90*fu- 4 Â¥=~ia brPS The following is to be completed by the City of Aspen Parks Department. it Comments C 2 Onir:ea>,e P /1*5 4 4 1 *44,4Â¥ *1 tri#fld>H Pa4O/94"01Â¢IG - 1 5 1Â¢ 8441(136040 PrUe:.s c,/ @98.eD 9,1614 21 .94 Property/Tree Inspection: - 1 - 11 Jaft l.0005 1(25Pg (U NU 9(20 7 Inspected by Date ~2~~ Date Comrnents: Accepted / Denied Jeffrey Woods 6102 Parks Director, City ofAspen Sfgh'W0 4 Date Permit Valid for one year after completion date of project Cline 6). 4.121**a.- July 23, 1997 THE Cm cP ASPTN ' Mr. Jonathan Lewis Jonathan Lewis & Associates 4649 Poncc de Leon Boulevard Suite 304 Coual Gables, Florida 33146-2118 Dear Mr. Lewis, Thank you for your letter mgarding the Bristle-cone pines located on the Paepcke Estate. I was aware ofthe interest in moving these trees to the Rad Brick Arts and Recreation Center and I am glad to hear thai the interest ilf still alive. The City of Aspen would love to work with you and Mr. Kiley later this year in allowing the Paepcke vision of sharing to continue in this manner. Please contact us near the time you are ready to make thi a transition so that we may contact Julia Marshal who has conitructed a landscape design for the Red Brick Arts and Recreation Center. She is aware of the interest in moving thc Bristle-cone pines to this location and has grtat interest in this project as well. 1 tgok forward toÂ· heming from you ok your representative in the fhll- Thank you for you generosity and continuance of the Pacpcke legacy. Rzspectfully. -rl al- Tim Anderson City of Aspen . I. . I . I 13(} Sount G,UNASTIUr . Asrm. COU]*ADO 81411,1975 Â· Pwki= 970.920.8000 Â· PAX 970,920.5197 I Od OLO SI M31 * $3&911 I W 6456 999 50Â£ 84:2[ 26.902 â‚¬4,Aa . July 14, 1997 Mr. Tim Anderson, Director City of Agpen Recretion Department 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr. Anderson: Al you may know. we purchased the Pacpcke Estate on North Pint Street last year, and are enjoying our new home immen,ely. We have also been arduously working with a team of design consultants of the highest level including Michael Ernomann, Dan Kiley, Steve Hansen and Jean DeMeulder, to create a new phase for this unique piece of property. Central to our proceas we have been especially sensitive to respect the character and legacy ofthe property and to infuse it with a new life that will be representative ofthe continues evolution of ASPal. We have had wonderful interaction with both Ihc Historical Preservation Commission and the Aspen Community Developmed Department. We are moving full steam ahead and look fOrward to reinstating the property as a center for intellectual and cultural activity as wen as a home for entmaining both established and up and coming artists, Scientists, musicians, designen, filmmakers, writers and thinkers. One ofthe ismles that baa come up in the planning of the new life for the gardens is the necessity to relocate two beautiful Bristle-cone pines that sit in the middle of the site. Dan Kiley, our landscape architect, has indicated that this is vital for the survival ofthe trees and the garden overall. In keeping with the Paepcke vision and in the spirit of sharing the legacy and spi,it of Mrs. Paepcke and her gardens, we would like to offer to relocate the Blistle-cone pines to the Red Brick Arts Center We hope that you will be as excited by this proposal = we were when the idea was originated. Wo would request that you kindb' contact us at your convenience in order that we cam begin to plan for the moving of the trees later this year. Sincerely, Jonathan Lewis Roberto Posada Zed I 20 SIM31 * S3&!b'11IW 6#56 999 50Â£ 90: D Â£ 26. 80 'd3S FOUND 3/Jug// C V '.. - I .9 WROUGHT IRON/ 16* CHAIN '- ' --6 *274~ -FENCE ~-2 -- FENCE 1-- --9 0 EDERTEENA ,=a- -- .ar., - o t 4-/41 13-1.9034\\ \\\ 4-4.0.441 ~b<-3 O - 0 --LE Il--- /-=CEL .-/ m ... \\\ i \41\\ i\ .11 \\ - -------1-ZInknoÂ» i 17 Lf -Â»~ t *i Fq<21 :2*h:Jit< -\\ ---- 29-0 EZERGREEN I U . r - --4 . 1 1 \1\- - - 34-0 L 4... A--~ 4~3>x ... - - . .2 4 16.0 EVERGREEN -4, ./..t , 5. Â· -r \- - \.. 5 -0 PAE Â· * , \ ... . - ... -4 ..-I -6. -*. 1 --I . 1 11\1220\0t~-L---, -4 I \ i. -- - 4- . . -- 1 --.....-e=-- .v-.-.*b.-.--4 f>~ -7 - I -... \ -NAÂ£29ST =.. . 24 PIN!4 - 1 - ..A, 4/. 4.> -74.-\ 1..4/524". \ - - 1 24*â€¢ EVERGREE~ -Â· ~h. 7 3 < - ~2*#:1*2' 36 . ..--L-- - 1002.01 -- \V 1 -1 r. : 7 . r /7\2.- -r Â¢ , 1- . . .. OBSER ATION - / jÂ¥:6'F- --- -A_ 3 ~ 3 -A 321,1 -- MA/LBOX-<- z\. .. -_ _. k 1 - _ - . -- - - L._ -DECK --6 ,-/ t PT--- Â·- 2 6 -+ --~\4 1-f ,2 n/, 18=0 E'vERGâ‚¬b~ r 4 . 6 0 PlykE- - -I-j r /& -1001 - ' -- .-- - .. - .1 /\11 RAILROAD TIE J .~ D Â·Â· , x.2 157 -- . - 9/1...in. /..\ 9.5'0 -1Â·1 a r - \ . %. .,r .11 --2-. For ' : L GROUP OF THREE ' CURBING,, -V \ L 2-4.5-2- ~~ E--4-- 1.â€¢0~ r\**~-1~ 33 ./ .. .. . C 24. 1 J -1 -,0918/\ 4/0/ l>7 -=rl. BIRCH TREES . In. : I --- ... Â£ 2 f 7 . ,-,6 1 Â«r 7,Â»4 - i i 0107- 1*22- / 28'â€¢ E . \40 :2 73 1 - 27 + E-~bREEN Y '17- 1 Â» 1 - \ b! 11 - 0 1-4. .-.- ... , -T~ \ \-es -- ,/// 1 -- - ts - r~ 3 Â»32~ f 142 EVERGREEN ~ * 7 A b{ QI WALLf I . 1002.17 / 4 -0 DECOUOUS , 4 A. 1001 03 1(ni.ZELZE. ~/GATE.. . 4,4 ~4 N. lit STGEET - 1. - K _ 66 & - -- \ C /. %:1 1"'UJJ. ;W: Ap. . I .536 12' EFRG~21 - --1 1 r \20 .. 1 1 7~\ . . I . \ 1 1 4 - r \ 3 'Sk-=t:k - - -/ - j . .* .*-tr 2=4/A-I-.2-' :-'Â· _ 't - I ->C 3 - \ -- a -42- Ph /1- . 6 . j, / 4*0* 16 I.Â· - 1.~el 3-1 - 1 9 0 A- b L. -CU - /1, - LY C V 01 *-4-1=+ - f . C WOOD J 1 il.. .- 1 22' BRDK 1 4 x--- ' ,- -~----~~~ *07 U) - 9 , WAI-[X \ ) .0 / .-L-- r-1 1 2 , I '=-244/78,-4. -2-11 8.5~0 4 50 8/Â¥11 ! - , PL 1 4.21 EVERGREEN r TÂ»TRUNK , 4.-eff 484,EVER EEN 3**5 BASE r . , -4 2 *7-0 2-' -1- GA 11Â¢49 <22 A - - - I i. 1 9.0,-- * 1 '.----/- 8 - a Â· -~AÂ· . ---- ima- i 1 . ... 1 2400 EVERGREEN . SHQI Â·Â· 90 --Mpa i - -9'" - T- /5" 11- I * . . Qui/ 1(t~'**Rues Â· . -11-440,. . , .. - -1, . . - + - 971./- - CÂ·Â·k . r. . b/Tk -24~ - 9Â£ras. -* - *~Â© .. /2 . . 0 . 4 kl: ..492 :i ': 1 Â· ' - I . , U-/12/U/-1 .t- 0-GA :-Â·, ' 14,2 >---16,~ , RUN- -~ 2" 5.- 1.-1 ',:.t. L. g . _.18. a â‚¬4 <-Â· - .,L.alti~-Â»4*~~~ti.:tti'~5 -12nCT*Â·2-Â·'~ 374*JY~,2:~9-1-**49.-.u:.i 4-,. .,. ' r,Â»--r Â·4-9419~2Â·90.- -s-:-- .:.3i~2- ~..2,5, 2....1---ER. Â·. 2.. - I.- ' -0- I.- ./ . - -A: â€ž'e:r I ... t.. *Â·' --: v. 'Â·.. -1 . =2 6 ..,I- ' 966d1.343-194Â»192 N/.~~'llirbi#11/4.,4*fic,IED, .1. ... -":---'42;.~Â»:,~~9 +~.nkRME*J''U.4~347Zy -1*1: *\4.-2-Â«lfÂ·{ 14-'lk Â·r 4~â€¢NÂ·65. Ptu:.17-. < ' ~ -~ ~~ - - r '- Gr ~~.t~~~- ~,1~*L~it:I~~,vi~Trip~~1*~124I~$*U~AF:6-AW-W&**~p49 r"Ed//23*704#52AWY,lagog/"IQ,MAIWIf* ' . - f ././*. 4 51&76.*Ankul/6.6:3Wi2/4172Â£#97 Di , . 1Â·/ W ./ . -1 - 9 Tr -- 1 -- .1 1. Â· Â·Â· Â· .. - t Â· I \ I. : \\ \ AbFEN OEIN 1 Et< 1-64< ENVIKUNIntl 1 1 AL 5 1 UL)lte \ I .4\ i\\ I / 364 EVERGREEN CLEANIAG) \ \L .1 .: I. \ \\ 1. I. \.. \\ \\ .\ : I I \ ik 1. 1.. ,I ... . N ' Â· SITE SECTION I\\ I. \ , - \\\ I I.\\\ \ \\./ \ 7,>, \ \ 515+09'11"E \ \-444*\21 \ 2&21' j I. \ \ N / . \B- , 0/ 6 - CHAIN LINK 3-953513 \. ./. ....I:-I. .0------0....1.---------I--- - -- ~ / - ----- 3 9&<-7 ' 1 FENCE / - ---- //// , Â¢,EVE}:EGREN -190â€¢ Evee*REE,h: /\ - - ~1-13.,3*-sci. I - / // fl -0 / -/ /- --- I .1, \\ /--\\\ ....:...:\.-\I:/ .....\ .\\ \\ I . \ -~- --- --- / -- I :I ... \\. ... I. I. I. ------ \ I . . \ \\.\ ../.-50/ / -\ ----------- .-I. / , - ----- - \.. \. . Il. ... I.\ ./.\ %.\ ~\\-- 29", EVE,di/EEhinAA :TY././....1 . \ ------- .-2 :~:. .----~*- GATE 0 -9,\ th \ ./.1-9 , /- It .- / -- / - -- - ----- ------Ful- 222-----F -- I-F---P------*-Ill------- 970 ---------I-.,- -- ---- -* 0 ./ 1 - 05.51 Tw , 1 744 \\ ./\ \\ .\l .- --\ -- I-- -- I % ~-1------- -- -- // 2 2-------------- --- ,/- \ - ---4-- -- ------ -- - ---1 - / --- . - - - \ I N - - -- , - - + N \ ---- -------- .-- - I i --P--~ I - - - \ ---- -- --222--2222----------I/~R+EL-2- -- -- , I- I - & I $- ----%-222--21-2-e[IESWED---- ------3-2 ------ - / 0 V - - -\ \ - --0----- , ---- / , 3350--- - ----------- ----- - / I ------7.- -- --.- I.. â€¢ FMNEE , I --- ./ -0 --- -- /- -- -- --0--------0--- / --- --I-- - - - ----- --BENOMMARK----- ---- A: /' -7- - 1 i - -45- 1 .<lm-4 h J _: j -Li~--173-------22-------_222----------- ---- --Il--.I.------I- - J1 - ~A~~ONC. WI~NE NT. 43.3 r --- - / \42Â» i --. / ----EEEM,=le/(76(2-- -- ------ - -i---I. - // --- -- - I--- --- --- -- - i 1 -4 -<-0 --, ------ -- ---- - ---- / -J \9) L --0 0,67 \P-- - 0- ----- --- -- - 6 1 ----*-- -----il---1- OBSERVATION - 9 V. - _*Ub. --% -/ --------0 ---/ 0 - ---33,000 ~j;Â·~0 tft-~ - ,----ln %1 4 -I---------Ill.- ..1, -/ --j / LS: EVSUB -.-7-- -------------' TCPOFSLOPL------1~~-7 DECK 3 , 4 / \ Â«GATE , 0/ 25â€ž. 0 - 9 I '' 3!2:*128-811 -o JAYâ€¢ ER<:16REEA I < 0 ': 4/; rk - RELOCAT - 1 MAIN LEVEL - ENTRY 98'-60 0 - 1 1 =** OFFS 7 - / â€¢ Evee,â€¢2EEN 7 - A MAIN LEVEL - UvING 100'-O" â€¢ 1003.5* 21'â€¢j Ev*e~REEN i rfâ€¢ EVER,Gl~EN ..1/ 8 . A MAIN LEVEL - GARAGE 98'-3" Â· 1 * l.]PPER LEVEL - M. SE[*OOM 1100-6 1 TERRACE - 1 -2, 70-3 IT RAIL / \ 12"+ EVE 4'* ASPEN / 1 CEkLE C / --woco & UPPER LE,/El. - BEST BEDROOMS %2Â·6* ' \ CTO BE REL A GATE 7 104 ASPEN i OFFSITE) , I / l . // n 1 N ~ 1 l. I. \ SPA / POOL 1 \ 47'Re - ; 36*4 2;Â·SESBE~N ' / 1 -' \ ' 7-1, 0 06.24-NU | *1 /-.r 1/1 rl , 4-3 \3 \ i r- , / \ 1/ , / 9 . i / \ Cqt. WALL PER SUT. 43.3/ /Xy-,0 , h ~BELLOW v.*) * -- ~> EVEFUREEN / / \ ; 1 (PROM LOUER /- -ill. 0, I 054.0 7,FEE . 1 42 1 2@2_FLU ~3 U / /* 4 ) 2 / LEVEL POOL LOUNCZ> 1 1/ se sigÂ·A A3.I 1-J-- UL 9, ASPEZLI--W Â«ams; j < ~~ -4~ki471-17*rfu< 1~ 4 b EVERGREEN r -4 % ~/ 4 1.=20' -1 \ l- \/ 1-1 24.EVE~~7 y ~3251 8455 -, ~ / 1 F ic=..*t ' 2 4 , 1 .i'"3 5!abcx,lcus // --- Â·Â·-f<'15)Ef<+EEEVU. , 1.3 A /32 1.W/, a \ j reÂ·~ 14 Ilis:DEOFS il *91* 10 de: ASPEN 9 2* r. 12\ / 1- - - 40 0 * ist Of * -- ~i 744 bal,YLAEEN 1.- 7 15,\ . 1.-1 \ CO / \-Â«CL r -- 514*50'49"UJ j 4 / 4-10-3-j/ SITE SEC_ J Â£* C it 41"* 25: EVEQUAEEN Fli- n 1 -1 0 \ 76009'11"UJ L.,6.0 EVERGIREEN 294.00' L..Efeism N 2,8=~GEI+~ \ L /94 EVS.GREm -Itâ€¢ EjEE..pifet Le=. EVE1@502EEN CO,AC. Ulbll,--' ,12*Et' .... :%. JI.-| r. .- 3 f'Â£23'4;*CM,ar#Lit.i*~re/~FC~R:F.MtieffTN#W~5~5Zilic~.~1~&Â£9*Ej):e ' ... '~-: -4..*&0.1. .,.,*..39?Eed<*:4Â·.iESÂ¢'Pil.litilÂ·30:: ,.. . 4 tjah#VAP#,01 /YÂ·.Flk#*IMM._: 'Â·Â·Â· * S ld*.0*MAW: AMS'MP,r,' "Â¢4*iÂ·iqf - :' . 4. : ret=.n vuÂ·,4:.imt. .. ..... 0 Â·WIEDFT#57Â·;,5311 â€¢ *.lf .,Â· 1 . .NA# 12 * -O.... 391,9;66 1-*2:f:i.4:4 1 . 0 ... h:SylAI-Â·, ~i,. P# *17- r- )11,7.: :1&**Lf {'+44 1.?rtÂ·r,Â·48.9, .. 1 0 - Fil:11.11,3 1.fwt:EÂ· ' 0 - . '44.1,67~1 714, 31.,t.*. I ,-r ~ 1 -11 - 1 . . Â© ,r:<45'i'psib~i:W.,1.-; , ... /*5.4*6Â¥'r,44/44#' .glt'*iâ‚¬ f, >01 0 Al/>19443=05 L, 4, 17'81 40 Vil k ' It r . . .. . 0 . . 0 . . 0 . . . & 4. . . . . . ....0 . *ee = 00 0 0 -0 ... * Son,dajduldÂ«.Re #1; 7996 â€¢ 771*Aspen Timis 194 ,Â·. e U. 1 1 L , 1 ':-28'*I- .991 .697;' Â· . I ir' 44.9 I . 4944 4*UM 'Â·' -1,+:6,31:',1: 20,~;;~ w W â€¢dall N . ~05. r 5,01 , , ' Â·-r'; /37' r , Â· . r Â·r , I ,1Â¥,1Â·hÂ¢2~mr 6,Â·Â· ..AUr,i,Al..'.,I- 1.Â·Â·*:.iÂ·i'It , 'for .Â· ~ ~ W,4,~1,~1~a,%7%15'ilip:tz:7t,%' Ai*,f liu:d~Â¥Â»1@66* 11â€¢& d*44#,1100 61 *umelency or urt 01 â€ž'.: to melÂ· 1 *9*96 *01*10*,IWERÂ®ent the ketall election MAke, : 6.6,6 DIvition 01 WIWI|le. 6060 ' 1 A 'Â·4 *htl Â·tâ€¢hall be held d the Ild el Ihd de,-1, prlmafy, tight?? De-. C[)00210 urill â„¢inda, - , : Â·â€¢ ' enpectatelectio,Â£ 011Nth leparite pa,eN,he do,U'> at 2Mp,n. 18* deneation and , DAI11$ *hal| 601**00 In.*117* by the 11 t. A porch And *ut>port men, CHÂ·01 Ahd ebn*trucildn I 101 *104 0.1Â¥ 4/* 0101'M#/ 6 the :enulne m Iront deck od te,1 ' v, a , ' 71, *10â€¢te#6 01 â€¢hb pe#*10 *hole I me It purportÂ¢ W=11-6 In the presence 01 the 4Â»6 h 0 en:Ible Hector od IN tle *tlon. 1 10 Ount 0. b . h be 6 Inill be 06*n~d and held 0 811'8 tARD :Al; 1,46* 1 DIAtil andâ€¢.,7 Col 0/4.06 .4 2 Ior tâ€¢d -W i *1â€¢1Â¥ 01 UUMOO . 11' ld ~ultle'ent It they 4,~ar to be ilined bv > Illatt!180, froM thâ€¢ DIvt.loil of Wl,dill,0&,1 put, d Râ€¢â€¢Mul' 1 Â· , ht; Itt * iri ., ,~~~ â€ž ,â€¢cljom:&~- '94 ;t:~:11%=%4=:=b:72 + 2 M Mt14 lilell/â€¢11â€¢ IM -â€¢und, 01 such he *2%*2*51Â·E;*;GE&= 3 =2Â·~:ton:;t:~c ///b<Ntlce hing n E 8 ' ./ 'E'Â· u ?4@limiliburik,6/trijith"Lile u *tizzliha:ritril'/, Ihd not sublect '' 6, antenbd 10 11/lhal-**Llhat =/ be,1,â€¢00-â€¢),2â€¢il,---*-iblthin thirty li mailed. i tontrlt}Gtld tdiâ„¢MIdIt*r.And *611(leal p i,o)i*#.Ai~f#&#[M N tted. and the 6 '. comm!116*â€¢ to4504.Â® *ill Inmlâ€¢,te any e ..ult* 11,0/031'*11*1 *HA~ilth tertilled to to restrkliBE Od, 111*1 <â€¢Â¥tly,%, eâ€¢pellâ€¢48. b<IfigN#%4;ttt:' W '"1*6'Jt'li"bwr~*8 t 'plall "11*44,~4 14. A. 6All 4 HANNA 15!iIAL#<461~ONER.* .Aotâ€¢ thâ€¢ *6004*re d' ' 0 4*, r .., committee In *o.. the Clerk and Recordet shall make * 47442 -a, W.W.1..,11... H.Nirâ€¢A 80! HAWâ€¢dd Id,'thm Ve,WI,ni al~*~~~~<â€¢NidiA Jh.Il'MII 6tDehdtta# I. I,, ~het#, madifil' 13:,R.,Idiectled, in ~*Mit#*ty, i 'LKY* 1 JUM:Hmwimaw/%1:WAW"MAW=m"f, It, 15.Ad,;, mang'B~&41=&*4=:,blbl~J"*"0*.4e prtni,d onthdomela, Ii, 16"110Â¥#,1*moRK.*11/411&06/LIBN.0.1......43:bavrlip//d.4*>4â€¢~~0;X:50:*591/dE:::t:MO:titu U.brA te.ka - 4*Boild W Couâ€¢i'.Ck"*160'81*/4 1,| Pt|614:Â· 4 ., ' .fir meb=2*3Â¢~ai,mmEPE: e,%42 Â¢ , 0 K tijdowid##RN.#Guirfeld< 'Imle:Mwir:;24#62:. Slaterecall itat~t~Â£11,0 ie,06nl lor recall. , *il,nuâ€¢m"0~41#jW61**'t~i--puth,Illndomilu/n/~IAA,Il,74,r 9'M!!M '11' th,.mcer* biatement 0, thit AN 04 be amel,led Irom time to ee--4 *hall be ON 'he ..161 In accoiâ‚¬lance %4 2 > Atl eaaddes 1â€ž M d**m Ih. d~~~ T ' 1~Ith.Stlte laW. W IM IWI provlde lo, 1 11.61.~11 til unld.lui td., MEÂ£*Eld'"&*M~*"40 '.- *I'I,A.-- _7 --_.-- W hel- M Ietillil:lyll, the liumbent ihall mle In favor 2%0/,9=4:22/~7Â·/8*164**1~"6-Â· //// W W"/d'~*AdVed and the 4 - 3961*69 attivlty,â€¢00'ation demod#Ming *21*loh WHAk â€¢41&,a t;/2"ille' 66*11 be 1111*d u ptdvlded In this 1 id ; Â· ~ W ~1~JI':~luZS~# [SAth.e:111*4112& 01"~N.UtSebmt==i: *ttll Q,londo Italutes and this 0 . ,#SliAAh#9.dtA 66(1- 2 petty an imdam lid miteeteÂ¢*.4666.DIâ€¢09:~ held at the 1 0%1 , . ....1.601.060.006 4. 2u~;~~ la *~ &F'dak:# a.,1,â€¢:95'~ =â€ž 4 . ff"Wit ~ E&=:juz~: N::;"1:Â·'#~9,0~ /1.14 C.unty &*2151% f com not m 06-1.hedÂ¥,Iththâ€¢Whet,Â¢1*71..Die. 811 ti, ballot *nd the Clerk shall print , the kAlb,Ah: ablve those names. â€¢You may . p. vid,0.:co.i,udi.. d.Â· 68.1Â£~,9.4,~~Â¥fNtE&5~Lyw,:,7,7 -p- h,Ri . 81 1,1,1 4. I 1,21 *Neht Dyet*dâ€¢4 K U.4 miEFWAR#11*fl#*-â€¢Naâ€¢Imt.welhmdite - . 10=1 - 0 1; ,:Fall:U.1=241:Wh.Â¥6,-pa*fLEF -~ I t CIU lot ~ m And retened al requlted by the . , Shall Section 02 of the Holhe Rule Ch,21- be Â·4 W HIM CpÂ»rade (ImpD* Rdal,06â€¢la~â€¢44 1% provide thal DIgnature, tâ‚¬~ 1,6 7 ,*Â»*MA'e*@~te'â€¢ Detttlelâ€¢ 1-1 be *4Â»ed by... . ./. .d.d ..4 Aft, aser ' ' , 3 I -1 Cant-'1 /4. ... r I ...% Id J ote 101 tha candtdate at the '~' ~3-t<1:31tf.{Zk&9adaf ~Milt#W#;291:.; r1.1,21~,1~d~â€ždi''f~I~u'~ItÂ·2.2EENEEG .1 * d AU.*491*~Â¥... .e .i. 4'.i . ~ PuBLIC HEARIN(i, 0Â¥ THE hOAND AT nl ZZ;iia- - Alâ€¢Y~#Uâ‚¬!E20!&21 h- =10=.t*4 REcuu#tâ€¢EETE,GON'11 100â€¢DAYOF'tly, t, Go,e M:eYdd9,I~~~~~Qt~~~ F lh" Chartei Dolely by the Â¥*teri of,hat 270, 3/1/blf#WARAM gpjmd 4iUt*UkA,4566 *veht.*Noar,0- ..op".d,e.-1 L C ' ' '/ astrkt 01 re,Idtr,ce, then the . dumber el illatures tor a Cb:mis.Ioner k i 5, ! t.b k~2"114 -0-41 -14)1~Â¢'104*<HEARI '11Â¢ 11* ASPEN'11#JES ON THE 5111 ' - ~0**Â·7~~f~M tt~~*I"h"1~< . candidate,hall be red tl edho li lly (50) 1 4 6*d te' 4 ..42,4â€¢%* H; *066*te,mia,dll:11,84*,1,r~~Â§(~~990~0~M)N 11Nt lah bAÂ¥ 0, : Ct~N~J~~ I canity e~ectl. 4 elect#4 <*Inllied . lt,0,62.1 ..Ide within elthe , IÂ·,114"j'..': 4'*=N."emtprai'*42&3 #i:Dbt;oNs~com, '11~%~522421,2,01**Millisy,"*UMWIM##54,1 from July 23 5~';2~t~~~~~~rnj~,~,U*2&'~m~ : g:~:~~:'~~322&223&' : 21 4 . 13*~ g~*:3% R. ~~~~MNA*D~~~~fl~~U~Â£~M~ i33&R?Elge~~9~~"~149%i:~,i=: f 1 I ?14 -60Â·,, 117:N?*11,",2?~,f,-193%H#KÂ¢2- 3 4, 4Â«4 he th, Â·' ' NA* . a pow whente Corner No. 1.01 Â· D~~liC-A,pa Ilt,A 1,1, * ant, 13, C~S~~5;~AM*ps!~ '~;*;44,4,,4 6, t996. + t. *.1-LAL-. -I._ , .r~--i- applteatkdne, the annual operatin, budget, othilt*1:Â§72*B1RR211~IMM~*118:Â¥;e'. 4,01,ctÂ¢*AbbMibNdtliksdumoll 'â€¢ annual budge: appropilâ€¢tton, levy 01 taxesâ€¢ t'Â¢*' ~;,~;~~~~~~~~~~~ ..:. - r -p .: i - 4 the )4bhe pe*cE GaRH E TAKE NOTICE. That the Obard 01 cal'Inlill . special election, ordering RE 123 6, 2 . ull Â· m=!mt1325:Mprmi:*,t~fel. h,Wilhke,~81'7116[n Â¢6~*'*rimpe.-11 11111'Red by Det!1168 W th be 11 Â·' NOT~â‚¬811 HEREeÂ¥ OIVEN thal a public Q omanes, 6* 1001-vilbi LA,roved by Ihe~411.12;%:22~t~14%%,stru JF~*, 9 1Â¥1~t~U"wgÂ·"s,00 â€¢Al'â€¢16,ee,&:,1% #21~~R{~0*ttma:,mâ€ži U&*la-w -Iesâ€¢Ie,VI occur,ente el , hea< 011 be held on Wedne,day, July 24,1 1 J n=:03221.51*:3'.=1==AUENMN~'* 07:ZI~'dq~~.1,1 ~u SI.. Clues meellnd #aom, basement of ' CRy M, 130 8. mkliN 8-1, A,pei, Colorido 1 lim i . /Ii' 1 -ra.-I' L '21-2'~ 'GJÂ·~aa~;j~~t~~D~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~EEgiNEii â‚¬Â· 4 ,--AllÂ¥ 18, u re,ulam DchiÂ»044 ual 4, .tthe' '1*B/.294//116:3-~me/themE KIMNMMM#5%201 'rt./.. 4:foihi,6/j,9,/Jilsgill:A.Elile'ljguiffuitifi#*tz:Z .In A- 9- 10, 611.1.1100 ..I.011. 4 f.0. 4 r.: 17*18~~1~~1~IdbE ka~~ I LTr -r-_1 ,~~ ~;1#Wt CONCEPTUAL t, - . .4,0 lutiod Are available 161 + cert,nu.ma,T ow...d del!,0, 1 my to thi - HmORIC UlÂ«*URK LOT SPUr 00,10110*Ithe DIrectâ€¢,01 4 011100Â¢ 101~M to~| |,C,~ed.lbit 04<0* le,4, Nd E 11 WERESÂ¥'0*j (hat .public ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~*@Nkhi 4~i.. Â§*0~:*~~~~0~,Al be lied.W Wtaladay. July 24. Â·-'&.midlw=#&*122!?!,%Ni&~~Câ€¢ ~.'* lfÂ¢t~~2,; :~.11:7/"t*.*iMM;&:0#0715*Meâ€¢'bee'â€¢-'buement 01 .bi Deput#dIN, ARmcerder lust"IC,th:' .10. bulth 66 6-, I=4,6U~~'Iâ€ž. -a Olle'~48ll'4'*'*A obrado, WAA 50*12~Ar,â€¢#0â‚¬NÂ· ~.- 'NAN#M=1225:Me *p,11:=27:=.=: 7, =t: t . 1,1*. het aild one lot 01 6.000 square **Â£1* 71* 4ldhe-.w-md id#44 ,1,61 6. t.':heailit'*t,WhilddliMUIWI<,&1411, 1998:t ' Iuch* 44*~nentÂ·lhlpetmon- U,ertilter j. Ieâ‚¬'Â· 11'*6,963â€¢quare loot lot wit Include the 10.,ed~ ~md*11604* 62*th *CS:H p.m, belote the i be *1*-bjell,Ible *lectot, numberin, Cti, 81'(14 ht*'ent relldence ind theapplicant Coeklit]RY Coel~11 Cha/tÂ»#1, least **~44â€¢â€¢ beecent (25%) 01 the lot,1 y relimt' a rear"r~,ablek varlance ol S leet Bleeket -1 11 de,cribed u lots N, O. P and 0, td tohbl- ' Ilumbe#1 *otes Call at thellit elettic#k* al bid d FAR bot,U, 1 500 squee leet for this tio,Il which the el!*eÂ·J P"del, The Property li loclted it 214 E. limilillimil&lizilligiall1x:n~;~~gilibi)gutillimiEspieiole,ft&v.LEBRMit,24#14:0Â£911&2:b:Juten,1/..AdA Ty,19,1/ist,Efi,irmt,6*44*2:2,262:6:A//65,1219.VE:'il//r 1/Jake VIckery Chair M!!1 19~. ~' 2~ dity (001 hyl trom the date 01 dete,-itio~ 1.., -4bn:hed ln,11â€¢e Alpen Times Jul], 6, 1996. - .1 - -4.-- ., L I '-6:49Â·6 Commitment for Title Insurance Issued By Nations Title Insurance Company 6800 College Blvd. / Suite 700 / Overland Park, Kansas 66211 913-491-5585 NM n V2 1550 IOd 220 STM31 * S33911IW 6#56 999 500 92:91 16 .GI '833 Commitment for Title Insurance Issued by # Nations Title Insurance Company Nations Title Insurance Company, a Kansas corporation, herein called the company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies ot title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named In Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land.described or referred to In Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Cornpany, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months alter the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Nations Title Insurance Company has caused this Commitment to be signed as of the effective date of Commitment shown in Schedule A, the Commitment to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. Nations --itle Insurance Company By: 43.6&*A,)a. President Attest CLUNSL Secretary Counte.Igned~,0 444 By Authorized Of#cer or /42~4 . 1 U.-P ALTA Commitment Form NM 8 V2 1550 90d 220 SIM31 * S3aV11IW 6#56 999 SOC 62:9 t 1-6.Et '83-:1 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONIS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect. lien. encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disc!ose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, enc'umbrance, adverse claim or other rnatter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendrnent shall not relieve the Cornpany from liability previously incurred pursuant to Paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations 3. Liability of the Company underthis Commitment shall be only to the nanied proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form ct policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking Fn good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire orcreate the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered bythis Commitment. Inno event shallsuch liabilityexceedthe aniountstated in Schedule A forthepolicy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stlpulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies comrnitted for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are rnade a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest orthe status of the mortgage thereon covered bythis Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. NMe V2 1850 20d 220 CT"71 + 974973!W 6&66 0(9 500 93:9t IC CT .93 2 MTI ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each ticle entity shall nctify in writing every prospeccive insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a ccndominim or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request. Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Ownerls policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be cbtained from the Board of County Commissioners. the County Clerk and Recorder. or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT10914 A and B are attached. COd 220 S I M31 * S3291- I W 6*56 999 SOC 12:9t 16.61 '83=I NTI COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 05/21/96 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT10914 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 3,450,000.00 Premium$Â· 2,958.00 Proposed Insured: Rate:RE-ISSUE RATE JONATHAN LEWIS and ROBERTO POSADA (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: Tax Certificate $20.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: PETER NITZE, JULIUS LEWIS AND PAULA ZURCHER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH H. PAEPCKE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO and is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "Al' Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. Ind gir - 0- .-- EXHIBIT A LOTS A, 3, C, D, E, F, G, H. AND I, BLOCK 55, CITY AND TOWNS ITE OF ASPEN. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHERLY TEN FEET OF THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 55 ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS A THRU I, THE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 9 ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS A THRU I, BLOCK 55, WHICH LIE WITHIN HALLAM'S ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OP ASPEN, AS SHOWN ON THE WILLITS PLAT OF 1896, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 27 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS, AND AN IRREGUIAR- METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL ADJOINING THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LOTS ON THEIR NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARIES, ALL OF THE ABOVE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF FIRST STREET, SAID POINT BEING S 14Â°50 t 49" W 10.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A, BLOCK 55, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN; THENCE S 75Â°09'11" E 294.008 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 256 AS PAGE 877; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 14Â°50'49" E 10.80 FEET; N 33Â°03'19" E 42.21 FEET; N 07Â°19 '05" E 112.35 FEET; S 70Â°18'15" E 209.82 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 341 AT PAGE 373, BOOK 381 AT PAGE 294, AND BOOK 382 AT PAGE 2723; THENCE N 62Â°39 '00" W 161.33 FEET ; THENCE N 74Â°18'00" W 26.73 FEE: (DEED 25.73 FEET); THENCE N 82Â°05'40" W 178.19 67=,râ€ž- THENCE N 34Â°55'17" W 130.87 FEET (DEED 130.59 FEET); THENCE N 09Â°26'25" W 210.13 FEET ; THENCE N 40Â¤36'53. W 5.17 FEET, AT WHICH POINT LEAVING THEÂ·WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 381 AT PAGE 294 AND BOOK 382 AT PAGE 2723; THENCE S 55Â°35'00" W 49.81 FEET; THENCE S 12Â°24 '00" E 242.09 FEET; THENCE N 75Â°09'11" W 28.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY PROJECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK 55, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN; THENCE S 14Â°50'49" W ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF BLOCK 55 AND ITS NORTHERLY PROJECTION 184.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 97 Mll * 97)wll TW 6#56 999 508 82: 9 I 16.6 1 833 MTI SCHEDULE 3 - SECTION 1 REQUCREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the acc=unt of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper inscrument(s) creazing the estate or interest to be insured tnust be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from : PETER NITZE. JULIUS LEWIS AND PAULA ZURCHER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH H. PAEPCKE to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : ALPINE BANK, ASPEN original amount : $2,000,000.00 dated : March 10, 1995 recorded : March 16, 1995 in Book 776 at Page 463 reception no. : 379801 2. The above Deed of Trust was extended by instrument recorded May 24, 1996 as Reception No. 393004. Tr Tr T 7 - cj - Â·~.7 - M 3 . Deed from : PETER NITZE, W W ~ .6 w - -1- r' - , AND PAULA ZURCHER, AS PERSONAL REPRESETATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH H. PAEPCKE To : JONATHAN LEWIS and ROBERTO POSADA 4. Evidence satisfactory to the Ccmpany that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 5. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 6. Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the witholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 7. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) 504 Fin -acc 099 5,7 91 0T lE C T ' 01 , NTT SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, enchroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of che premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, ar material heretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens. encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or actaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior co the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Taxes due and payable. 8. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 62, 104 AND 355 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 9. Easement and right of way for electric, telephone communication and similar usage as Get forth in Agreement recorded in Book 415 at Page 284. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT10914 A and B are attached. DOCI 220 SIM31 * S3&!Vll I W 6556 999 500 12:9 I 46.61 '83=I Jorlach.â€¢r, Lewis & Assodates 0 . February 19,1997 City of Aspen 130 South Gatena Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Lâ‚¬wls / Peada I'â„¢pâ€¢rty, 414 No.11; Flnt Street, A,pen CO 81611 Dear Sir and Madam: This letter is to authorize Michael Ernemann. The Ernernina Group, 720 East Durant, Aspen, Colondo 81611, (970) 925-2266 to act in our behalf concerning matters regarding the development ofour property at 414 North First Street. Ifyou have any question, please Call us. Sincerely yours, 5.--/k-/1942â‚¬,-- AK)MEKID}9*4* _ I.lon#bal-As Roberto PosiME-- U 4649 egral de Leon Bowl<verd Stte 304 Ccial Cable.. Flonda 33146-21 18 (3051 609-84790 - FAX (305) 6669549 %- 52 ~ 3 0 C e ~ 4,./ - 44, ~ - 7!onwood 61- 1 OQW Runny Ni 03\ 04'r 5 fl -ASPEN 1. - 4''X f -13/ l NE b *2 \PLA - *elarÂ» K \&. COLORADO r 30* \#,\04 2 227 1,0 \ -51 9 4 it Gillesgic St Y 61 9, tufy â‚¬ -7- Subject Property 1PO'/: , P-I 0 7 \~1-40 0- \0 \ \2.40 f ,- '- '98- lers, 46 1- . #.- 'CÂ·. --Ce,ea_ , . 39 1 0 Sownlill 0 67 1 Â»/ r/ E~ f ~ ~ f / 30 a./ 1/4Â» 4/. L. h , ,c 2/ 5 L- 9- 0, . a >-7 rl.4 1 -1 o VS 44#4 Gitb46./ 5/6" di79 00 1 Â»c._ < A A % Gov E 1 - Cr*94#1 --r 4 />, i O wes,vicw Dr 9 91* / .1 2- 1 9 1 3.Â£ 1 19 Â» tn--2 1 6- -0 9 4 -~h,Jl L1*C -1= 11 00 l 1 1 U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 /82 f I 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 0 1/2 MILE 1 1 . 1 1/2 KILOMETER 0 1 0 VICINITY MAP 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO 1.,0 4 ~ r otthway c; Dr \,urc Ct I .. E.e..ail/'~eed,Mâ€¢ppkÂ»*'-1,1-Nution oÂ¢ marrtage or legal separation by RECEIVER SITE AND A SINGLE-FAMILY Â·~ * RE: ZIFF SPECIAL REVIEW FO rtes 01 Pitkln 01 other RFRHA agreements which are the petttioner or co-pelltioner. and upon ry provides necessary for RERHA's closing Including, but personal service of the petition and summons RESIDENCE IN EXCESS OF 15.000 SQUARE FEET; ' not limited to, the GOCO grant agreement and on the respondent. or upon waiver and NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public ~ ialilies lor a conservation easement, the Colorado acceptance 01 service by the respondent, a hearing will be held on 'Wednesday, April 9. .' , -rai Is fundj Department of Transportation Inter- temporary injunctton shall be in effect against 1997 at a regular meeting to begin at 42(*} pm a: governmental Agreement and the amended both parties until the finaj decree is entered or beore the Board o f County Commissioners, --. istoners of RFRHA Intergovernmental Agreement. and the petition is dismissed. or until further order District Courtroom. 506 E Main St..Aspen to --, - aval of the approval d the form col such documents by the of court. This temporary injunction becomes an consider an application submitted by Wmiam -Â· pen Space County Attorney's Office, and upon the terms Order of Court upoo personal service or upon Ziff requesting special review approval to -. 1 01 2 fifty and conditions set forth herein- waiver and acceptance d service. Either party utilize tran,lerable development rights (!DRs) . ..1 *.V servation Copies ol the luilÂ·text ot the Ordinance #97-7 may apply to the Court tor further temporary to exceed the County's litteen thousand rRHA and are available tor publk inspection from 8:30 am orders. an expanded temporary clunction. or (15.000) square loot floor area limitation lor 1 .4. ..4- . 44 TB, as co- to 4.30 pm in the Office ol the Clerk and modification or revocation under Section 1+ 10- construction of a single-family residence. The ./ I '-4.1 econd coÂ· Recorder, 530 East Main Street, Aspen, 108. C.R.S.. or any other appropriatestatute applicant is also requesting approval d a TDR i r. 4%,i= 0 9 wide trail Colorado. 81611, telephone (970) 920-5180. TEMPORARY UNJUNCIION receiver site on Lot R-86A oithe Starwood .0 ......e~ : 9, - in Pittin Jeanette lones, Deputy County Clerk BY ORDER OF COURT. YOU AND YOUR SPOUSE Subdivision. For further inlormation contact :52 acres Published in The Aspen Times March 8.1997. ARE Rick Magill at the Aspen/Pltkin Community - 1/'- -s:-15,-/f: . subject , (A) Restrained from transferring, Development Department (970) 920-5062. tÂ· I - 42.- .. Ad Apply 1 encumbering, conceating. or in any way Copies ot the proposed Resolution are available 0 J . 30 2.-Ar . PUBUC NOTICE onty: 1 RE: 1008 E. HOPKINS - LANDMARK 3 01 the 1 DESIGNATION. PAR,!AL DEMOUTION, ON STTE disposing, without the consent 01 the other for public inspection during regular business edicated IRELOCATION, CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL, party or an order at the court. d any mantal hours in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder, ses: 1 RESTDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS APPEAL 300 property, except in the usual course 01 530 East Main Street Aspen, (Colorado 81611. 3 which ~SQUARE FOOT FLOOR AREA BONUS AND SIDE business or for the necessitles of 'ife, and Phone (970) 920.5180. ,requinng each party to notify the other party ot Jeanette jones, Deputy County Clerk e which IYARD SETBACK VARIANCES 3,8111 Tuite. Chai any proposed extraordinary exoenditures and Board o# County Commissione Â·r 44' date of 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public to account to the court for all extraordinary 4. shall ~earing will be held on Wednesday. March 26. expenditures made itter the :aiur.<:ion is in Published in The Aspen Times March 8,1997. :7 .i (:Â·Â·NjÂ». I which 11997. at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before effect: e Open /the Aspen Histonc Preservation Commission in (B) Enloined from molesting or disturbing the NOTTCE OF PUBUC HEARING ,&(..,,- U / the Sister Cities meeting room. basement 01 peace of the other party. and PLEASE TAKE NOTICE .r.. RFRHA 1 City Hall, 130 5. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, :in two ~ to consider an application submitted by Arthur (C) Restrained from removing the minor child That the Board of County Commtssioners of of the 1 Bellis requesting approval tar landmark or children ot the parties. d any. from the state Pitkin County, Colorado will conduct a public without the consent of the other party or an heanng on the following Ordinance at 3:30 p.m. nably ~ designation, partial demoittion, on-site order d the court. March 26 1997, Pltkin County'Commissioners .. at the relocation. conceptual approval for an addition~ Date. March 3. 1996. Meeting Room Main Street. Aspen, Colorado gram, to the house. appeal to the residential design.~ Dennis 8. Green, No. -786 81611. at which time and place all members 01 Net Of standards, a 500 square foot floor area bonus, a 117 5.5pnng. Suite 1 the public may appear and be heard: d the west sidevard setback variance of 5 feet, and a ~ Aspen. CO 81611 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY .; 1 U ...9-4 Â· e the combined sidevard setback variance of 13 feet. 0 97&925-1835 COMMISSIONERS OF PITK]N COUNTY, 7 trall The property is located at 1008 E Hopkins, and ~ ~ublished in .rhe Asoert Times Marci 9 -1997 COLORADO AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION shall is described as beginning at a point 12 leet west . OF A CONSERVATION AND TRAILS EASEMENT .. . 1 - ... I .... 4 the of the northeast corner of Lot L, thence PUBUC NOT:CE FOR THE ASPEN BRANCH OF THE R!O GRANDE nt ot northerly to Lot B, thence easterly to the IRE: WUAMS CARETAKER DWELUNG UNT: RIGHT OF WAY .acts southeast corner of Lot E thence southerly to 1 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public ORDINANCE #97 - ' " ' -' ~1 4 ..itx , 960. I ons, the northeast corner of Lot D, thence westerly ~earing will be held on Wednesday. Aprd 9, 1997 RECITALS -21 '. 41.. as a to the place of beginning. For turther Lt a regular meeting to begin at 4Â·00 pm before 1. This Board. in Ordinance #97-7, the and information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/ ~he Board 01 County Commissioners. District acquisition of a Conservation and Trail 't.,8 n of Pitkin Community Development Department, tourtroom, 506 E Main St. Aspen to consider b Easement in the Pitkin County portion of a 32 1 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CCs.<~9~le)JUZZihair En application submitted by Dexter Williams conservation and trail easement to be granted Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 4equesting approval to construct a 385 square~ by the Roanng Pork Railroad Holding Authority loot deached caretaker dwelling unit above the~ CRFRHA-) to an as yet unnamed grantee, over ublished in The Aspen Times March 8,1997 ~arage. The property is located at 32 W. ' upine the real property to be acquired by RFRHA to - ar / PUBUC NOTICE ~Drive. and is described as Lot :6, Mountain be acquired from Union Pacific. and commonly 1 Â·Ill --/6. he / RE:414 NORTH FIRST STREET ~alley Subdivision. For further informatio ,19~ known as the Aspen Branch of the Rio Grande . 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public tontact Suzanne Wolff at the Asper,/PitkinJ Right 01 Way. .....da> 5,-- ... 3, 1 hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 26, ommunity Development Department (970) 92841 2. The Conservation and Trail Easement )R j 1997. at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm belore 1093. Copies ol the proposed Resolution are Â·w contemplated by Ordinance #97-7, was to be . ..4,- r# 1 - ::1â‚¬ , ..0 I the Aspen Histonc Preservation Commission in ~vailable for public inspection during regularâ€¢â€¢.3 Incorporated In the conservation easement for -4%Â·.f<41 4/ 1 the Sister Cities meeting room, basement of lusiness hours in the Office ok the Cterk anci the entire Aspen Branch through Eagle County, (Zit), Hd!, 13(] S. ClatenaStreet, Aspin, Colorado, ~ecord# 530 ICast Main Stretr Aspen. Coloradabl Garfield County as well as Pitkin County. and Â· -; to consider an application submjtted by ~1611. Phone (970) 92GS !80. ~ the express terms and conditions d that Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk conservation easement were not available for ./.2,-f ' .---J.." Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada requesting \ 11 approval tor partial demotition 01 the existing.i~ %'Bill Tuite. Chair approval at the time of approval o#Ordinance - ./.Â·+ house. temporary relocation ot the garage. and , Board of County Commissioners #97-7, 4~. 2449. conceptual approval tor a new addition. lished in The Aspen Times March 8. 1997. 3. Ordinance #97-7 made approval ol acquisition ot the easement subject to approval ~O,sqmu~re ~ef,'267u~rienfryLY yt~~c~ ~' PUBUC NOTICE of at! the other documents necessary to (inalize , .,-,i#,Igs.SigiX,t variance of 5 feet. The rear yard se:bacIMt ~RE; COCKRE11 CARETAKER DWO-I*3 UNTT RFRHA's purchase of the Aspen Branch. Â· "--Â£ 214,%9* variance is requested in order to allow for an .FOTICE 5 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing 4. The conservation easement attached as - . 5742*t- r'Eiv:r addition of approximately 100 square feet to #will be held on Wednesday. April 9. 1997 at a Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference ts . I the existing garage. The property is located at 1regular meeting to begin at 4:00 pm before the one of the additional agreements which must I ... 062'.**42.% 414 North First Street a metes and bounds # Board of County Commissioners District be approved by this Board in order to finalize. .0#*.AÂ¢, 5:4>3 i parcel, a legal descnption of which is on file at { Courtroom, 506 E Main St, Aspen to consider an The Open Space and Trails Board has reviewed Â·. r.:.-k .4.4:9~ 2 the Community Development Department. For I application submitted by Bonnie Cockrell the conservation easem ent and any n ~ ~fj-&.'.14 further information contact Amy Amidon at the / requesting approval of a 696 square foot attached suggestions It requested have been etâ‚¬.../Pjgft/. .*.71'~.~0~.~/~' Aspen/Pltkin Community Development # caretaker dwelling unit to be located above the incorporated. Department, (970) 920-5096. 1 garage. The property is located at 43991 E. NOW THEREFORE be it ordained by the snake Vckery. Chair ll Highway 82. and is described as a parcel 01 land Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin AspenHistonc Preservation Cammission 1 situated in Section 20, Township 10 South. Range County, Colorado, that the Board hereby 0~ Published in The Aspen Times March 8, 1997. % 84 West ot the 6th PM. For further information approves the acquisition 01 the Conservation I ~orttact Suzanne Wolff at the Asper/Pitkin (contihued on the following page) .,$:t-~ *faftj'MA'.1'37 g .%16/*EX 'i- i~E#32,4% 4 1.: :l,-,i:.f.:9.91 PUBUCNOTICE _5&31.4 NOBTHFIRST FIREET (PAEFCKE> +NOTICE E HEREBrGIVEN'tnat-* public ' hearimt witi-be held on Wednesday, February 26, 1997~ at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm 6efore: the- Aspen- Historic Preservation Commillion in the Sister Cities meeting room. basement of City Hall. 130 3. Galina Street. Aspen. Colorado. to consider an application submitted by Jonathan Lewis.and Roberto --Posadrrequesting approval for partial demolition ot the existing house and conceptual approval for a new addition. Applicants are also requesting an FAR bonus ot 500 square feet and a rear yard setback vartance of 10 feet. The rear yard setback variance is requested in order to allow for an addition of approximately 100 square feet to the existing garage. The property is located at 414 North Arst Street. For further information contact Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, (970) 920-5072. s/lake Vickery, Chair Aspen Historic Preserva(ion Commission Published in The Aspen Times on Feb. 8,1997. PUBUC NOTICE RE: 17 QUEEN STREET <ONCEFTUAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 26, 1997 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commimon. Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall. 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, to consider in application submitted by Henry and Lana Trettin requesting conceptual development approval for a garage. The garage will require a front yard setback variance of 13.6 feet and a udeyard (south) setback vanance ot 9 feet. The property Is located at 17 Queen Street, and is described as a metes and bounds parcel, said tract being a part of Tract 40, East Aspen Addition. located in Section 7, Township 10 = South. Range 84 West 01 the 6th.P.M.. City oi Aspen. Pitkin County. For turther information. contact Amy Amidon at the .Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen. CO (970) 9206096. s/Jake Vickey, Chair Aspen Histonc Preservation Commission Published in The Aspen Times on FeeD. 8,1997. Â»avalitj -- . I A ASPEN Â· PI'TKIN December 29, 1994 PLANNING & ZONNG DEP.ARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Sunny Vann 230 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot K and the West 1/2 of Lot L, Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen Dear Sunny, Planning staff and the City Attorney's Office have discussed whether or not the landmark designation of the Paepke house at 414 N. 1st Street applies to the above referenced property. It is our finding that because this is a separate parce-1 which has different ownership and which is not contiguous with the rest of the Paepke parcel, and which may legally be developed with a new dwelling unit, that it is not affected by the landmark designation. No HPC review will be required for redevelopment of this site. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, / Amy*micÂ¥on Hiktorid Preservation Officer U- CC: John Worcester, City Attorney %23 09\ 4 1 -~ - r.-0 4,tig . ~.i i ~ar i l. / 4/1 12- U L i <=D,Â·1. r , 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ PHO~ 303.920.5090 Â· FAx 303.920.5197 Pnnted on recuied paper D[REcT F.Ax LINE: 303.920.3439 . T 88-2 - VANN ASSOCIATES rÂ· Consultarts P'anintri~j December 21, 1994 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Amy Amidon Historic Preservation Officer Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot K and the West 1/2 of Lot L, Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen Dear Amy: The purpose of my letter is to request your confirmation that the structure which is located on the above referenced property is neither designated as a historic landmark nor listed on the City's Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. The property is presently under contract, and I wish to confirm that Historic Preservation Commis- sion review is not required to demolish or relocate the structure in question or otherwise develop the property. As the accompanying improvement survey illustrates, the property is located at the northeast corner of First and Francis Streets and adjacent to Mrs. Elizabeth Paepc- ke's former residence. The property is physically separated from the parcel on which the Paepcke residence is located by a public alley, and is therefore considered a separate parcel for development purposes. The property in question is also separate- ly owned, as indicated by the commitment for title insurance which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The property has been separately owned for more than forty years. Existing man-made improvements to the properly are limited to a small shed which is believed to have been constructed in 1972 (see Exhibit 2, Appraisal Record). It should be noted that the Paepcke residence, whose address is 414 North First Street, was historically designated in 1981 pursuant to City Council Ordinance No. 57-81 (see Exhibit 3). Based on the wording of the ordinance, I believe that the designation applies solely to the existing Paepcke residence. The property in question is separately described and owned, and is not referred to in Ordinance 57-81. As a result, the development of the property is exempt from the City's historic preservation regulations. As we are contractually obligated to resolve this issue by early January, I would appreciate it if you would review the attached material and provide me with your 230 East Hopkins Avec,~~e Â· Aspen. Colorado 81611 Â·303/925-6958 Â·Fax 303,920-9310 I . Ms. Amy Amidon December 21, 1994 Page 2 written response in as timely a manner as possible. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, Vj~N ASSOCIATES ~ Sunn)1~nn, AICP I SV:cwv Attachments CC: Ms. Toni Zurcher Arthur C. Daily, Esq. c:\bus\city.ltr\ltr26394.aal . -1 D- - 1 .W ' COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE EXHIBIT 1 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 07/11/94 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT-9198C2 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 3-1970 Amount$ TED (Rev. 10/17/92) Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: PROFORMA (b) ALTA Loan Policy, Amount$ (Rev. 10/17/92) Premium$ Proposed Insured: 0--e. A=L= â€¢ Tax Certificate $20.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: ELIZABETH H. PAEPCKE (DECEASED), AS TO PARCEL 1 THE WALTER P. PAE.PCKE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST, AS TO PARCEL 2 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules: Fax 303-925-6527 A and B are attached. t W - SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: vi. The following documents should be obtained and recorded from the Estate of Elizabeth H. Paepcke, deceased, Probate No. , in the Court, County of : A. Certified copy of the Letters of Appointment of the Personal Representative . B. Personal Representative's Deed describing the time and place of probate and date of appointment, and noting the State Documentary Fee, conveying the subject property to parties to be determined. (AS TO PARCEL 1) va. Deed, executed by the Trustee (s) , or as otherwise designated in the Trust Agreement of The Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance Trust TO : Parties to be determined yBC Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. v.l. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor (s) . (This instrument is not required to be recorded) .5. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) ./67 Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the witholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) (Continued) <1 . W SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, enchroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. /7. Reservations and exceptions as set :forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 62, 104 AND 355 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". L- /2) Easement and right of way for electric, telephone communication and ; a-) similar usage as set forth in Agreement recorded in Book 415 at Page 284. rhis commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 zhe Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-9198C2 A and B are attached. In\ -A f - EXHIBIT A - '-PARCEL 1: LOTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, BLOCK 55, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. TOGETHER WITH THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO ABOVE SAID LOTS. v PARCEL 2: LOT K AND THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT L, BLOCK 55,'CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. AP fÂ·AD . lili f ....... 0- RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL RECORD AR.101 1/64 - I/84 4 CITY OR TOWN (ABA) SCHEDULE NO. ~ - /2)2.5 (DAI) MAP NO. (DAF) TAX AREA (AAA) PARCEL N02*39-/24 4 0 - CDC. ' (VAB) A:&,d~~ < (VAC) (VAD) (DAB) TWP RANGE ' '- ' - ' BLOCK LOT(S) , SEC 9, SEC 4 R + w y,_ L CITY NO. | (DAD) SUB NO. |(DAJ) NEIGRBORHOOD 1 u jl(DAKISCHOOL DIST. y PROPERTY ADDRESS 4/4 6) isl- ' (BAA) ADDRESS (HAC} (HAE) & (HAF) (HAI) (CAC) (CAD) (CAE) BOOK 0, PAGE TYPE OWNERS NAME MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP SALES DATE (HAH) Clerk': No. DEED 8.ABI 1 Fr:Al DFY-BIPTION . . REMARKS ,. ,~ , ,,*. 25 2733-124-13-001 1 1-AFS ; 2735 12 4 18 001 EPEKE, MALTER 9. 1112 1212 'E INSURANCE TRUST 450,000 5,000 455,0 j MORRISON & MORRISON, LTD. 0600 ???? 5 nEST AOAMS STREET 2,310 ICAGO, ILLINOIS 60,03 r K, AND i-NE h2 OF LOT L, CCK 55, CITY AlÂ® T{JeltÂ·iSITE OF Â·k.SP~ JI~7/7 91 P,g.1 95-- 1/2-'c~_,i/ f.*r rl 4 iL OCK 55, lIl Y A NI) I U KNE 1 1 t Ur A aP i a *J*YO ~- GARAG'- 0#JAY tAND . Â¢4>: ATTRIBUTES ~ PAVIDS' V JOI iEVEL (GBE) BASE UNIT SALES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. BASE TOTAL GRA' 11 'D. MIGâ€ž DATE SIZE VALUE SIZE TIME LOCATION OTHER Composite UNIT VALUE LAND VALUE COST APPROACH ; 39 E .-F- 1 - UN~APROVio joc ./P f r. c.e ZI q, c-[103 9 4, -2 1 2 -- MARKET APPROACH $ 5,0'*AL. JUI low FINAL ESTIMATE cullo'Gul .E ROPING Of VALUE $ FU?'irfACTUAk VAUIE?<MWAÂ¢*E~S~'?t*Â£3'A.*$*444.,11~** ST 'roll, '0, .41,~Y (GBD) (FBC) YEAR LAND IMPS. TOTAL LAND IMPS TOTAL ' / 10â€ž Rtl V.AL, NE PRESEN PUS,<wit,. 4 â€žA ,,vi_,1 ''. A''Â· "~68.....4â‚¬1 ~ 1Â¢U'. 9. '. .?-4:.+ CO~ APPIOAD(-1'CE.k ... t. ....,Â·;, ..r. Â»0Â»Â·l'~i~,-FttA. ..~21 la # 39?U.2-* 1-Â·on. 3%%,eD REPLACEMENT AREA (HAM) 1 C EPRECIATION CHAN) *%* * 1RREGU% DATE COST NEW FACTOR ADJ. RCN -%-6660--PRÂ¥57-FORC-ECON- RCNLD LAND VALUE TOTAL VALUE 1195 49),00 â‚¬ 000 4â‚¬ ),>o SHAPE I :. 5 - -I -r M : I r..- Pull'Wt' U lic CO, DE IC ~r,(f t) -,1 171; 1.1 - , stpsâ€¢L,(a 8 CORite 401 ~ NAI GAS 11' 'El ./W ' NON EAR,"<11, V 'Ef 51 fRON' â€¢ ' ~ MARKET APPROACH H) ZONING (JAA) USE IND. VALUE ADJUSTMENFS ADJ. VALUE SUBJECT SUBJECT SALES REFERENCE NAME/NO. Per SQ. FT Per SQ. FT. Sq. Ft. Ar.a INC)IC VALUE APS ' .- 2.En 6-1 1 r. :-j :-2/ m 2/414 -41(Au, ve k (114 45 7=Ry, lu':bl /0- , - -4 FAIR ~ PRIVATE A V,~.6 (La,4- 1 - fb- 9,/ Â· .,-f ,-.~<., r F i Y.,a,ta ,Â£, L., 0 4 f,U~'~~ POOR ~ YEAR-ROUNDU ,-43't.1, 0/4.,H l. '2:1 Af .-,9Â£./ 1771 , "itit'1'2 /11.2~fâ€¢'0"4% /fiS~~i'j~C- J 1100, br '7Â¢- re"Â·r pes %,6/2 ins.T (a,Mflotass, Firn-l' iru,. SEASONAL 11 4 2, st 04 4 ' 6 2 0, 0,-0 - 1 1 E -\1 4 -1 9 - 001 IT 2 , - SCALE (AAA) PARCEL NO. (AA) TYPE (AN) DESIGN (AO) ROOMS (AP) BDRMS (AQ) BATps /2- . I TYPE caoâ€¢ SQ. FT. AREA UNIT COST TOTAL COST TOTA4 COb, r . . 1, 12 11 M 0 X FIRST FLOOR/MAIN AREA AB F M AA 1, BA $ $ X ABOVE FIRST FLOOR AD F M AD BB $ x M STORY/FINISH ATTIC AD F M AJ BC $ $ X BASEMENT - UNFINISHED AC F P N AK BD $ $ X BASEMENT - FINISH AL BE $ $ $ X Bl-LEVEL/TRI-LEVEL UNFINISHED AL BE $ $< ) $C ) TOTAL BASE COST $ $ X QUALITY ADJ. _ DES. (CA)- EXT. (CB)- INT. (CC) NET (CD) X % X % x ADJUSTED BASE COST $ $ x APPLIANCES AND MECHANICAL 2 - Â·- Â·.,-(4'Â·44 47.1.0.94-44.442:4.u,*.4 ,+.-Â·. $ $ DOLLA ADJUSTMENTS L:' fÂ·'Â·Â· Lt. . X NAT. STONE/MOSS ROCK (FJ) FRAMING ADJ. (HF) $ $ $ X WOOD SHK/SHGS (HH) X BRICK TRIM (FK) CONC. BAR TILE (HI) SPANISH TILE (HJ) MISSION (HK) X 811ILT-UP (INSUL) (Hl) ASBESTOS SHGS. (HM) X BUILT-UP (3 PLY) (HN) SLATE TILE (HO) x CON, SLAB (AB. GOE.) - UI) f CARPET ..: ./ 19-(JJ) IM'~ t I 2. 7 '~2:'1.4. . 423;'.22 Â· - c r PORCHES -4, ., , C... ROVEMENT 43 4 OR . 0â€¢1 TYâ€¢ No UNIT COST COVERED (OPEN) PORCHES OP AM NA $ ; ORY 334 COOK TOP KA BASE COMP LA WOOD BALCONIES W AM NB FOUNDATION SMOOTH CK. TOP KN 3 FIXTURE BATH 18 ENCLOSED PORCHES EP AM NC 1...TE .LIC' DROP IN RGE/OV. KC % BATH Le TERRACE (PATIO) T AM ND WALL OVEN KB 2 FIXTURE BATH LD CONC. STAIRS OR STAIRWELL SW AM NE NE ..1.. DOUBLE OVEN KI LAVATORY LE .. Mul ... WOOD DECK WD AM NF EXTERIOR WALLS SELF-CLN OVEN KO TOILET LF CARPORT AF P F AE BF $ $ $ MICROWAVE KG BATH TUB LG ...M F. A..r LH ELECTRIC BBQ KH ROMAN TUB 11.,co ...... , HOOD (STD) KD STALL SHOWER LI PAINT l.1 GARAGE r AH MAIA AG . 2 0 2- 0 0 HOOD (CUS-STR) KE ST SHWR2W/DR "43 1 OTHERÂ· ITE L. 7. 1#STÂ· , ; * .44Â· " ' 3 0.... ... lilli (HOOD CUSÂ·CON) KF KITCHEN SINK LK BUILDING PERMITS ME,AL CENTRAL VAC KJ WATER HEATER W AWOU~V .[AloN FIREPLACE ZA WINDOWS INTER (AM-FM) KK LAUNDRY TRAY LM $ YARD IMPS. ZB INTERCOM (AM) KL DISPOSAL LN ZC , 66 0,/ t 'OOF & ROOFING INTER (REM STA) KM DISHWASHER U ZD 1 9-H t. ...0 TRASH COM FIX BATH LP REMARKS A ON IMPS: 1,4 zz Â·wHEATING , Se FT. UNIT SEP STACK LQ " M. r- v.#J . 1 040 $ FORCED AIR MA SLID TUB ENCL LR ...L - AA 14- AREA FACTOR 9% HAM) ADL $ $ GRAVITY MB WATER SOFT LS INTERIOR FINISH 12 PRECIATION HAT WTR/STM MC SAUNA LI 4,9 1 v .A.TER BSMT HOT WTR MD BIDET W api_ r' /41. /, , c ' YEAR BUI DA ORM Â° OOD Â°' ..LL ELECTRIC ME WET BAR LV - YEAR /REM DB . FOR AGE DE 9 ........0 ./ '00. .0 le PANEL Wl/FLR FURN MF ECTRN AIR CL AU 01 R ADD DC o UNCT. OBS. DF % OORS & FLOORING AC (IN HT DUCTS MG HUMIDIFIER MK ADJ. 7 CON. OBS. 91 0 .... lue FLOO' AC (In own ducts) MH ELWALLHT 7,0â€¢ATT ML ADJUSTED PERCENT GOOD x O% X % EVAP COOLER MI EL WALL HT ls.0 â€¢â€¢T MAA r.00. â€ž....... HEAT PUMP MY AT FAN W/TIM MN APPR. BY (AV) DATE (AW) - LAND VALUE .J f =~ * C.c. 284 $ 0-53 4 $ A.IC'll .1....T MZ THRU WALL AC MO REV'D BY (AY) DATE (AX) 3 - ...1 /0/1 APPLIANCES & MECHANICAL TOTAL $ Â·t @B a c e- - d â€¢1 0.9 fL +0 st d.k. 4- . L Recorded at 3:00 P.M., Nov. 12, 1981 Loretta Banner, Recorder EXHIBIT 3 Reception # 237080 sÂ»417 i;L295 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ,- i, C. F NO{CKEL a. 8 . L. CO, ORDINANCE NO. 57 (Series of 1981) AN ORDINANCE ACCORDING TO SECTION 24-9.7 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN FOR DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES WHICH ARE IN THE TOP TWO CATEGORIES OF THE INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES FOR THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO WHEREAS, by Resolutions No. 81-2, 81-3, 81-4, 81-5 and 81-6, the liistoric Preservation Commission has recommended to the City Council that certain structures be designated historic and a suf- fix of "H" be attached to the zoning of these properties and the real estate records, and WHEREAS, these structures are in the two highest categories of the 1980 inventory, these being "Exceptional" and Excellent" , and WHEREAS, the owners of these properties have requested desig- nation through written replies to the Planning Office, and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee has reviewed these sites and/or structures based on the guidelines and stan- dards in Section 24-9.3 of the Aspen Municipal code and found them to be worthy of historic designation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section i That the following list of sites and/or structures at these addresses be granted historic designation and the suffix of "H" be attached to their zoning and real estate records: 500 W. Main 501 E. Hyman 303-309 S. Galena 312 S. Galena 206 Lake Avenue Gazebo in Paepcke Park 130 S. Galena 590 N. Mill Ute Cemetery 328 E. Hyman Lift #1 Park Area (Boat Tow, Bullwheel, Tower, Skier's Chalet) 1 U 4/ 208!' 417 112296 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ./ C. F. H.ECKE. 8. 8. 8 L. CO. 620 W. Bleeker 212 N. Monarch 414 N. First Street 208 S. Mill 300 E. Hyman Owl Cigar Sign at 300 E. Hyman 328 W. Main 200 E. Bleeker 201-207 S. Galena 506 E. Main Section 2 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or por- tion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconsti- tutional by any court ot competent Jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining por- tions thereof. Section 3 A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the ,=45 day of (C-Cti k.Â·3 , 1981, at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, 15 days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published . once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by law Dy the City Council of the City of Aspen on the ..s~-3 day of - . .~- *2246 L~Lâ€ž>=,61 U , 1981. ' 7 q> , . '1 G 2114; 7, /7)1 2/%64.- Susan Michael 1 fe W X Y â€¢ 3 ' Mayor Pro Tem 4 -44#Ege, 0 f, i Kathtyri"'Â§0 Koch, City Clerk FINALLY. adopted, passed and approved on the *76 92:Siy of &44263 , 1981. 1 2 .1 44 .1 ., 4,0 '.- / LY. . 4.,1 .- IMA. M1 (ba el f 9 k A r E u 44 4 L 3 Stisan E. Michael - Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: M / 1 Idik- Kathryn S. Atoch, City Clerk 1 tj s*417 mi297 ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ~ Râ€¢ I C. r. lot.KE. 1. I . .. C. STATE OF COLORADO ) CERTIFICATE ' ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) I, Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk of Aspen, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing ordinance was ' 90 introduced, read in full, and passed on reading at a regular. meeting of the City Council of the City of Aspen on ~dl*g,tz;:,a-Â£206 19 ~, and published in the Aspen Times a weekly newspaper of general circul- ation, published in the City of Aspen, Colorado, in its issue of flokÂ·,-uu l , 19. ~7, and was finally adopted . and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on 62Lt LFW ' 19 9~ and ordered published as Ordinance No. .S=F , Series of 19 ~, of said City, as 1 provided by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said City of Aspen, Colorado, this .27 14<-< day of >"2-04=.*_koa , 19 ~. - I RaÂ«*0 4 20-e-L 1 Kathyrn S/Koch, City Clerk i ~. : ,@ID,JL< 1 ~ . - il -'-.., ~04<6~R~kil ./ .. I Deputy City Clerk 4 JAN-14-98 WED 12:07 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY PAX NU. 35 r, UL OPICE OF DAN KU.EY Â· _ANC'SCAFE AF:-1MTECTS .410 71 'ANINt:fs Â· CAST ,=AMA Â· CS LGLC,7 Â·u Â·Â·[RI.'C.v'i es.,;45 72.iFLO~C. 30*.-423-21Â·11 Â· .=AC.Eill,11.Lt: 31]2-45-3283 ME Amy Guthrie Community Development City Hall 130 South K]ena Street Aspea. CO 81611 14 JANUARY 1998 PO+LE HOUSE Â· ASPEN Dear Amy. At your suggestion we offer the following clariflcations of design intent Planting in North First Street Right-of-Way The exiMing grade and dramase patterns win oot be alterett Th= intent is to fill in around thc existing trees with a grove of quaking aspen. to extend the sense of foest =1 its filtered mnIight out towards the street The Droposal includes planting aspen throughout the properly, particula* along the â„¢st and south perimeter, with hopes to strengthen and elucidate the presence of native vegetation and forest structure versus halses atong the Hallam Lake Bluff. It is importam to preserve positive site lines and to respect the site's histonc role in the neighborhood; the planting of a,pen alc~g the west property line allows the house and property to read as if it isan extension of the natural areas to the north and east, and thus the arcs acts as a transition frombuilt land into mture. The chaice of quaking =pen *ems from two considerations, Fint, it is a native species which is locally prevalent and exists on site. Second, the aspen trce has an approphate slmctum and stature for the role - it is not too large. its narrow tronks branch high and thus create a sense of filtered siece, and its foliage eatches light, casts shadow and slows in the autnmn with unparalleled ch:uacter. The planang of quaking aspen along the right.of-uy can be done careklly to allow access. parking and other services as needed. Top of Slope Two items on the landscape plan fall within the 13-foot development set back. The first a flagpote,has been located stch that it plays a pivotal role in the entry seqlience into the house. It may be possible m align * pole aglinst existing trees on the slope for optimal screening from below. or to adjust the height so it does not extend above tix roof line of the house. A series of dry-laid stone Iialls along the top of slope also fall within the no development mod These walls am intended to provide a degme of spatial definition to the inner lawn area, as well as to provide seating that blends with the land- ne proposed walls are just 24'.30* bigh, built on grade, and are sd back several feet so that they are below the 45 'angle *om top of slope ~ mquired in th, Hallam Lake Bluff Review. 'rhis height and placement reuders the walts not visible from below. In addition, existing native shrubs and grasses on the slope should efrectively obscure the stone work on its north side. We propose to plant native vegetation iII those areas where it is sparse to ensure that this eRactisachieved entirely in lincwith the natutal character of the hillside, and that the walls present no visual j,Ilpact on tiw Hallam Lake area. JAN-14-98 WED 12:08 UPI' l OC UP Ptl., n i .6 , OFFICE OF Â»AN OLEÂ¥ 2 Obsenttion Deck The pritua,y goal is to reconstruct the deck to achiefe a lighter. cleaner look. PossibIA matctials are steel with wood decking or other choices that will result in a simple construct, Ule same size but less visible from below than the existing structnm. The current thought is to pull the deck back Sâ‚¬VCIal fect so that its decking is flush with the top of slope (+1001). This is not a crocial aspect afthe design. however: it nmy beprefkrable to keep to the existng footmint I hope that these 1houghts are useful in darifying our design inknt for the I.ewis-Posada prope tty. Picase do not t -itate to con=ct me if mom inhrmation is ocedÂ©d. 1 carely, , _* flu 1.-. Jane P. Amidon .1 JAN-22-98 THU 16:58 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO. 35 P, 02 .. , .L-, 1 - - .4 ' -244,3 p do~kike,0 .A, e,w. L N ,c,4 045*N Â· .i .' -2<732 :'. . - C ~ 44 3.Â· ~;//. 1 <-Â· 1 3.0.-...0 E vi.14 Evel.42...4 - , . .0 of -ir, Â· .... f , 7 2-1/~4-lkA' l <1 31.-06::5:14 1 -/~% j ,/6 .1, j I /5 Â·Ott-/uy.\ 4.4 9 .Lit--- I 1 . i P ''17-/1>62/Ir--/ -Â· .. . . r - Nk:k Â·:L ~~4~;*F=J Â¥ Â·Fâ€¢Â·0 - =-, ~ eâ‚¬& STOW, pIE'%5 7<9+ r .Â· L -C.- -1 2. : --- - 71 /'i 2 4 ;_. _, f Zo fO S ED *s PE+4 80884- 116 -7 - 1* 1 - l~ Â·i.~. 1Â·(Â·p*:~lf . -. e * 1 "r .J 9 Â· <:0=Tr *-A 1.k,OP -42 1 : 1. 1 1 L P. , j.'Â£ /' . (-/ / -19 1 - : i. 171'\ , I 6.2 - i 31 Â»~O /= ,\61 ,/ " 1 % . 421 f - L 1 - 4 t. k .- leÂ·><. --r'rif V. 3,1 .. I m $ . I. - Â· , w *1 14 - P SADA ... I .9 ':/,. 1 k . O 4. 4 0 4- .1 , . 1 . - I. 6 I . 7 ' Â·14 1 A â€¢ â€¢F . 1.f' 4 1 4 . 0 4 - 4- -2. Â· ' I . I. Â£ -F tâ€¢0'411,~a .-.. .... . -Â· 41' =r,r.lo ,47 5 Â£Â·AA z . . ls/; ./ 1 . . 1 . ' F-&481231 - . 0 0 .' 1 -[1414@op.L*D- -:. .. - .. .., - FÂ° 4 9 H ous E- Â· A r 7 1 4., p :04 27/Â·A L p' LAN ,. E'NT.8Â·T S.T DI>r 6 R k .. 21 -JAP' 91Â£ % ../.7.98 N 77 5 N 4 ... JAN-22-98 THU 16:56 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO. 35 P. 01 .. OFFICE OF DAN KnEY, Clurlotle, Vermont 05445 USA 2 302425 2141 k 802 425 3288 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE DATE: 21 JA#v AÂ·a~ 6 19 8 TO: A..9.7 A. ~114.-LE /' C.OM AL,b.,1.TKy. C>51. FAX#: 910 Â· 92=> - . 5431 FROM: d. A, u~ , C ord 12- 5 : L 91.116 Â· POS A 133 e .:r (9 4 4 Â· F' 147 WT: Ae M ra # PAGES: 1- PLEASE CALL IF YOUHAVE ANY TROUBLE WITH THIS TRANSMISSION. AMT; T H E F 0 b L 01.1 1 N & gle F-FLU 1 Guv, 7 72- ATE, 5,>M E IN'TIAL 1 DKAi, 014 NOW ~ TO b#Au >â€¢1' Tw T 145 p A Z.k:.i,-i~ / pol.-if'.*R'g r EN'TZ.,045 coNT .,4vll A-T:,44. THE OU<V>J'T HAÂ·6. Ual- f,71 12-rvp,WD,Fo - SW-7 WÂ¢ Â»42-f 4.41&&4â€¢u''b A.4 -fa .1641'r TWA 10&.lrd Wl,Â·L 1 T . (4 g K-W. 7 H 5 HoW,4 4.0.*, C.Â·O3156Fj /,4 A r-4 3AAS -Ta A L.LA T Ms Fv- Â°Tr 1 r *1. 7-*2 HOÂ· 1516*r 95 D; FFâ„¢-rAT, ATE w,Ti"r'MA 1-~*At.~54Ti0N tul-0 O.PE F.41-Kf Â¢4,61Â« 141 ft B G 214 Â¥0(144~ 4,3 47'Â£'41: 1 91 fle,5 - 54'0 yTHi 1.:I~ f BAT '5 *4 0 ra plta ~ Q ,TW TH.y CH A*Ad â€¢rEN- 61: TIA M CA#At,611 57'7' AT 1440 G'"51: Fr~'71'f:--ra 1~,AELAE Tilw gr.>Def WALk. FCOM THW PA~, A*'0*> 2-01&81Â· YA 44#60 1-N S"r. Al.Â·09,~ rpl E 4.r#ve.r 51>4, (14 )4 1911'812-) Aeâ€¢B Ait>*4~ THE NALL ' C AS A U A 4- le. 3 1 003806- 50Mr, 6/ 1,1.4,-60 CWM 14A-ng Â· AT #Ak,41 PRL- tu , AL-1.WAR'. TIU,FL-Â® c,2253 42 5149*4â‚¬ C-40 81 *19 FT Th DUST 1-41Â¥ pu.L-Â°FiN' F)~. 14*24B J.N>t MAIN FATâ€¢.f /}41-k 1,0 w 5.Ut>W C i) (Ldly,>) W 960 pLAh) Tpp rn T,le &Â·oÂ·W. Syv T.W csÂ¥ ' 5 A T A Y , Alel> A 13:12Â» 6> A,p'10 War"N 6-r }eNT,cÂ¥,-Â· ' F -r M , S LA IT rÂ»L . A vt,A <4 -t-* A 7' R.. c 14. I.Li -LD TH, S 5% 'Post 035 A, t-r 4 -svT 8.UC K Ff2,01.4 1-9yw- F.rr-7 08'nows>1; IF 1-79 FK'5Â¥r-*- 4,Â·A 49 00 40. TAA}'*5 + I L"* FOF-ktAA> Th 45,-ad,1 -1-WE~ 4~2e~4(Al.- 12-..reind Appl-,4 C-TION'. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION.WNE 12.1996 Ron Kanan said that he thought the landscape plan was submitted at final. Jake stated typically a landscape plan is a requirement that is put on at conceptual to be provided at final unless it is integral to some aspect o f the conceptual design. Also the emphasis of materials is at final. Ron Kanan stated that he might bring in materials at the next meeting. Jake said Ron should focus on the massing, setback and FAR issues because those are the conceptual level issues that need to be addressed. We feel that materials are integral with the conceptual design and are very important to the success of the conceptual design. 414 N. FIRST -WORKSESSION NO MINUTES - PAEPCKE HOUSE Jake stated that the board should focus on what is historical on the house and what are the flexible areas. Herbert Bayer did some of the design. There is 67,000 sqft, left that over look the lake. HOWLING WOLF Sven stated that a change order was submitted to the Building Dept. and during the site visit it was determined that we are submitting a light well to the basement but because of exposing a perimeter wall area it does generate additional FAR which would be over the limit of a minor development application. We would like to add the square footage that the window well generates as a minor development which is 120 sqft. There is a dimensional error on the existing building of 48 ft. so we really only have a net gain of 72 sqft. There is a new concrete wall and basement under the historic house. Roger asked if there will be a railing around the lightwell or could it be grated. Sven stated that a gate could be incorporated. 15 Aspen Historic Preservation records on 414 N. First 6-12-96 - worksession - no minutes - no memos 2-26-97 - worksession - no minutes - no memos 10-22-97 - worksession - no minutes - no memos 1-14-98 - worksession - no minutes - no memos 3-26-97 - 414 N. First Street - Conceptual, Partial Demolition, On-site relocation, Ordinance #30 2-11-98 - 414 N. First Street - Final Development - P&Z and City Council were invited to attend for this item so that they may have an understanding of the review and the HPC decision. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 414 N. FIRST STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1998 WHEREAS, the applicants. Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada. represented by The Ernemann Group. have requested approval for significant development, including partial demolition. on-site relocation. and waivers from dimensional requirements and the "Residential Design Standards" for the property located at 414 N. First Street. The property is a designated historic landmark. and WHEREAS, all development in an "H.- Historic Overlay DiSIriet or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: 1. Standard: The proposed de:-eloprnent is compatible in general design. massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacenT parcels when the subject site is in a "H." HiSIOriC Overlay Distict or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For HiSIOriC Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum. distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on-adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or inIegrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, all applications for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory o f Historic Sites ind Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay districr. must meet all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(C) of the .Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: 1.Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation. restoration or rehabilitation o f the struciure. or :he structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel: and 2.Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a.Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additiOnS. b.Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, all applications for on-size relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic SiteS and Sir.ictures of the City of Aspen. or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district. must meet all of the following Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(DH Z).(3). and (4) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: 2.Standard: The relocation activiry is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished dfid to the relocation: and 3.Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of tile relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation: and 4.Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security wirh the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastrUCt'Ure C0I1IlectionS. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to: or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie. in her staff reports dated March 26.1997 and February 11. 1998. recommended approval with conditions. and WHEREAS, a public hearing. which was legally noticed. was held at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on March 26. 1997, at which time the Commission considered and conceptuaily approved the application, including variances. A public meeting was held on February il. 1998, at which time the Commission granted final approval for the project as presenred on February 11, 1998, with conditions. by a vote of 7-0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That significant development approval be granted for the project at 414 N. First Street. Aspen, Colorado. with the following conditions: 1. The garage must be demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-slang. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation prior to application for building pennit. 2. A relocation plan shall be submitted. including posting a bond or other Â· financial security, as approved by the HPC. to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the garage. site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. The bond shall be in the amount of $30.000. 3. All planting or other elements proposed within the City right-of-way along First Street must be approved by the City Parks Department, staff and monitor. 4. A variance is granted from the ;'Residential Design Standards" as related to "street oriented entrance, ".: garages," and -volume.' 5. A rear yard setback variance of 4 feet 6 inches is granted for an addition to the garage. which may remain on the west property line. 6. A 500 square foot FAR. bonus is granted. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1998. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk )CT 20 '97 01: 80PM ENNED*!N JECLP 9.1 The Ernemann Group F A X cOVER SHEET Arcritects PO Bax 4602 Ascen, Cclorado 3161 1 To A w j ] A *Lljo'/l (EutillÂ·k 92 - 5541 4 303.925.2266 FRCM 434aej Erne,Â¥,AAe,Â· 1 v 26 DATE 44 e -,4,0 11 7 1 1 REMARKS *Arwr 12*at nummer =f cages nduaing mis cover sheet 4 Rease call /Vi< C. - with any questicns at (303) 325Â·2256. t OlpAA _ 1%4nrw Â©'e L rtae 1.148241 Â¢4â„¢,t 1 /1 *A:Ul EARÂ» 224% Clr'LCSÂ¥9..L~ 704-fr-~e 6, 1 It *mr: ** w.w 'MuMâ€¢- k.4 461.A..319 NWQk# tki Â¢.rA ckwk +Nk * 2 71.01' f 1 t.lu L /4, fesmÂ·ve .h,<. iN=o u'trsÂ·M# 11 ' ,-L_- .0....,4,.Â·1~,nt U'*ila 077 -~id, WEST 04 642651.fn . tyry 114 (Up.VI--fv fa oCT 20 "37 31:009;Â·1. EFNEÂ·>LiÂ·-,04 ;ECLP - - S X PEIGNTAL INGI~#EFS_24 STRUETURAL <SMSLa.; AN. I October 1 4 1397 Pie 1 Of 2 4/rly Jmie Mar=rt Constry==M P 0 2= 10493 Alpâ€¢16 Â©*ado 3161 2 f= 920403 2 Re: Refroom 41.4 lif. 5=ZeI Amen. 210=00 te= Jam, This 2=2/ FS b ?CdcÂ» 49 P m iÂ· N647 *tur = wic:!011 Irt,11:Inr. 19â€¢raing *e =em referencad, Fj=i Ade ic==1 lusteâ€¢:2 41 1484 vie. 14:r= = Se 39*67 turtatjan, end Irm di~sse: ter=>11. Tledâ‚¬ng:hnicaricâ€¢ 384=1#id 13 /cyted 3~na ~ifid #Ith *ider:50 Cf wer imMags 31:d previcus Mt:n,se,1 The :xmmr =p=â€¢4 *S= ==r ts.=Se Men 04â€¢rad lith 2 3:Zm 4,0 finah. Tht -408 ond * of leundimn won: 3 =ime:ad ts act =ve Itee i :aâ€ž<re# Two vi,naly 1,10%Â©r.s 3,2 mwired 11 5 tur=<cm 1 - The 'Vail .nt::t ~1!!shr 4/U *rje:,/ gravity cadz 10 31*r 211 4,13, SCik. We do Act know â€¢Pmt * d,#1~ f=61~ &9 Gmpt#ed #, fi:2== 31 111. Cl'ten flms the fcating ir =tile v*b ire Jothme mere than *mer *mes. f regrn,r.nd :nat,el =M==con ,Â©2*norbe.â€¢cad co *tesee=ete 2. Thi wal must 'lit 9. haral =11 Pe"gâ€¢ in/lu d * 11,8 pallmatâ€¢r *ar:M. The WeeÂ»Â· the =i the hiltâ€¢r the :â€¢aâ€¢â€¢im. This ocesmire will jigo increill shar#y NIM the =esifzs of #mund water. CÂ®De walls w this *en Primmrily built er!*Imily, 'with = =:e!%1 #re~eS lm#zed. WIWI = =Infoleng. perfermancs,sies cn imit bondng ind COOME m =bble fri~O16 With ig= 3,ld , ME:wacre *ads, ame sys=,11 =nd :0 cah,Se. Cartai:Wy vimodal wN :m =15 :F*w *ama. 25*ed* when mallor misCng Ma gim *turted or m..ved :w igh deve~ fer Mew *amâ€¢18!ts,me:. Age/6 new foundleon astsâ„¢ . regcneended & menj *il m==ms st 3#*1 wrk 74 5â€¢f,Met grivâ€¢ â€¢ U':Ii: 14 â€¢ 826â€¢16 CO â€¢ 81621 a (974) 3224510 , 7.9, (970) 927-05'17 'OCT 20 '97 01: 019!1 EFENEMANN GROUP P.3 pag. 2 ofir ma=lit= embelfeunds:!aL WIM An/"imdcbm:,4 1~*~s. 1,/Imwthotâ€¢.clon.ze#ect 4-** r: =pacio.11.0 - im.m,g Tmâ€¢-0~6 n..~.te.* re.,dm.:mt. i recon,nend thita ne. f~Id/â€¢11 e:=rl be omâ€¢Imdm *moftne *mer,=Obt râ€¢JiiÂ¢9 28 m. *Mocure #. dimmld abÂ©4 Ne= con=ugm= =R e-" dt*fc= 1,8 alÂ»Mart~mire m. cer. 41 SWPMen K Peillwat, PE President 07018 12 51(9/kko . I El=i GCOCI_20_ -'37 -31: 01=.1 1,1 r. 4 ~ ~1 KL 614 of Colorade C=n:;urSng Str..IC':ural EÂ·Â·glreerâ€¢; 4 .0â€¢-r-y .//I 6.41===. râ€¢1 2-- Â· Ckzober .7, 2997 To: Echaei Er=emaan Ememann Group :.Er-icecia Â· 720 East Durant Upen. Colorado From: Brani. J. Lahner.. . 4 9 Re: ~31==3=ng basement =.co.:e :ounaamon: 414 First Streer. Aspen. Coicrnao Dear Michael: The purpose 0Â£ this letter 23 -4 ESCUS3 -118 strUCCUrli integrity 3Â£ the EX:Stin- rubble fo~undaticn it the 1.CCUS iddress. The bcuse ind i)1~lciarion were irst const:ucted about 110 :,ean ago. The 13:cisting 'louse is 7.Vo 3=ries 'vccd ... *amed, The axisting fo=Eaten is s:cne ==Dia. A parsaf the Youndaton at 4â€¢ 1 the. front of che house 2-.2=3 acwn as 3.Dw cailinâ‚¬ basemens. Rapor:edly, the house. was- orig=aily me ircry. .U extensive:enovacion,frsmccial of the 4 1. U existing oui.aing .s anvimoned. Even:in theÂ· lbmence 31 d.2nsi7e xmcciei, the exiating itatle Talia are detarioratadand in need of :eng rm icabilization. Little maintenance has .. been done to the walls and =he mortar is very -veak. The proposed new work inci=ies chree elements â„¢hich will have i negative impact on the existing rubble Youndation: 1) insulating the rcof and 2) retaining 3now on the :004 beth of -rhiah will idd Ioad to the existing foundation arf 3) lowering the floor of the basement, which Jerves to destabilize the wall. The existing 5]undacion cannot carry additional loads and will need to be replaced, either physically or_functionally. Ifyouhave any questions, please call. Sincerely,e A (J/KILD- . ~rant J. Lahnert, P.E. Principal Engineer 305 14:h Strge- Gclder, Scianto ECÂ·*01 . Telephone: 303 384 3910 Fox: 306 324 9915 TOTAL P.02 1 1 4 MEMORANDUM , -ARÂ·Â¥:44Â· -'Â· .:;: :FitiÂ·'gr-:"Â¥ 1 - I y ./99'j, TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 7-.7- - Â·... -:..t'..i-y~,942?1;' THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director Lj FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 414 N. First Street- Final review DATE: February 11,1998 kl-~- SUMMARY: Over the course of two years, the applicant and HPC have held at least four worksessions and several site visits, and HPC has granted conceptual approval for the renovation of the structures at 414 N. First Street. The project has required HPC to look closely at the qualities that determine historic significance, and has resulted in a decision that the property' s importance lies in its association with influential persons in the community (the Browns' and the Paepke's) and not in its architectural character. The fact that the building which was constructed on the site in the late 1800's has been essentially obliterated by subsequent remodels, and the structural condition of the existing house have influenced HPC' s findings on this project. Attached are final architectural drawings and the landscape plan, along with the conceptual review packet and minutes from HPC meetings for reference. Staff recommends approval with conditions. APPLICANT: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, represented by Michael Ernemann. LOCATION: 414 N. First Street. See application for a complete legal description of the property. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) * PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in a. "LI " 11, Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard. side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distande between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 1 five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: HPC has discussed at length the extensive remodeling which transformed the one story 1880's home at 414 N. First Street into the current building, and the resulting structural issues. During these worksessions, the Commission members used a National Park Service worksheet to outline which elements of the existing structure have historical significance or define the character or style of the building. The outcome of the discussions was a general agreement that the site has significance as a historic landmark less for its architectural character than for its association with people who have significance within the cultural, social. and political history of Aspen (one of the five criteria which the City uses to determine that a site is eligible to be a historic landmark.) While many other historic buildings in Aspen are associated with a person who has made an important contribution to the community, for instance the Wheeler Opera House, Hotel Jerome, and Pioneer Park, each of these structures also have architectural significance and retain the integrity of their original design. Similarly, some other landmark structures in Aspen are associated with important local architects, including Herbert Bayer and Fritz Benedict, but those structures also retain the integrity of the < original design. While Herbert Bayer was involved in renovations to 414 N. First Street, it is staff' s opinion that the existing structure is a collection of remodeling efforts which , do not successfully represent the original building, the Brown family house, or the work of Herbert Bayer. With this in mind, staff' s evaluation of the proposed remodeling of 414 N. First Street has viewed the physical preservation of the existing building in a different light than has been the case in any other HPC review. What HPC has attempted to do in working with this applicant is to+ find a reasonable and appropriate way to preserve a quality or essence of the property's history. During the HPC reviews, certain elements of the existing house have been identified as particularly important to preserving the character of the former Paepke home and people's memories and associations with it. These elements were the retention of the west (street facing) facade of the house and incorporation of this wall into the new construction, retention of the carriage house, which is essentially as it was in the 1800's, keeping the main entrance into the house on the north side of the building. keeping a garden wall along N. First, maintaining the importance of gardens as a part of the property, and maintaining an overall sense of "mystery" and privacy from the street. HPC found that the conceptual proposal met these requirements. On January 14, 1998, the applicants held a worksession with HPC to discuss the methods that would be required to retain the important west facade of the existing building. Part of the issue centered on the way that the second story was framed on top of the 2"x4" 2 stud wall of the original one story house, and the structurally weak hinge point this creates in the wall. After an engineering study, the applicant determined that there are three possible ways to address the structural problem: 1) Sandwich the wall with large steel members which would be bolted through it for stability, and brace the wall in place while sections of the foundation would be removed and replaced incrementally, 2) Use the previous stabilization method, but move the wall away while completing foundation work, 3) Dismantle the wall, build a new structure and reapply the old exterior materials to it. The first method has been estimated to add approximately $200,000 to the project budget, and both the first and second methods would require that at some point in the process the wall be laid flat on the ground in order to insert new structural members into the framing to bring the wall up to building code. The second method, moving the wall away temporarily would require enormous cranes and would be likely to damage large trees on the property. The second and third methods result in the temporary "disappearance" of the building, which must be preceded with public outreach so that the community at large will have some understanding of what is happening. In the worksession format, HPC indicated that they would be willing to accept the third alternative: taking the wall down and reconstructing it, using existing exterior materials. This is undeniably an approval for the demolition of the house, which is contrary to the stance that HPC has taken and may take on other projects. Staff is concerned with public perception of the decision, but it has been weighed by the group and does appear to be reasonable in this singular case. The applicant is encouraged to continue to explore any other feasible way that the west wall may still be retained as the proj ect proceeds towards construction. In terms of the final approval application before HPC tonight, minor changes have been made to the west facade of the building since conceptual approval, namely the removal of the oval stair tower, the replacement of the stucco with clapboards, and the replacement of scalloped shingles in the gable ends with square cut shingles. Staff finds that these changes are positive and help to "quiet" the character of the building and the areas of the addition which are visible along the street. As shown previously, the garage structure will be retained as is and moved very slightly to the east so that it is entirely on the applicant's property. The proposed landscape plan is attached. Staff finds that the issue of most interest to HPC is the new fence and entry. The fence that is proposed is somewhat similar to the existing concrete block and stucco fence, but much improved in quality. Metal grating along the top of the wall is in keeping with the mesh that exists now and emphasizes the private estate quality that HPC has felt was important to the Paepke ownership of the site. The landscape plan also includes the addition of numerous aspen trees near the west facade and along the rear property line, which will provide a semi-transparent screen around the structure. Please note that the plan shows Aspen trees planted in the City right-of-way along N. First Street. Any planting in the right-of-way requires approval from the Parks and Engineering Departments. It has been indicated that a different 3 approach will be required because cottonwoods, not aspen trees are the preferred and historical street tree in the West End. Staff recommends approval of the design as submitted. The review has involved a thorough evaluation of the nature of the building and, staff feels. a reasonable decision by the HPC. It will be very important for information to be given to the public to explain why HPC has decided to "let go" of a building which has great sentimental value to the community. The message should be clear that HPC is as interested in protecting important resources of this century as the 19th century Victorians, but that this home has structural issues and architectural idiosyncrasies which affect the value and feasibility of its preservation. All conditions of conceptual approval have been met except for those included in the staff recommendation. Some issues with the proposal still must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, namely built features of the landscape plan that may be visible from Hallam Lake. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The surrounding neighborhood has numerous historic structures, and the idea of creating a Hallam Lake Historic District was at one time considered. The great majority of these structures have been remodeled as is proposed for this site. One of the significant qualities of this property within the context of the neighborhood is its heavy vegetation and the notion that it is a private estate with a "secret garden." Staff finds that the applicant have maintained these qualities. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposal is successful in conveying the essence of the property's historic significance and place in Aspen's history. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The existing building is an eclectic mix of many periods of remodeling and different architectural references. Staff finds the building fairly undistinguished in terms of architectural character and structurally deficient in many ways due to the evolution from a one-story to a two-story building. These findings have led HPC to determine that a reconstruction of part of the building and replacement of the rest is the appropriate action. 4 ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant final approval with the following conditions: 1. The garage must be demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation prior to application for building permit. 2. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security, as approved by the HPC. to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the garage, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. The bond shall be in the amountof$30,000. 3. All planting or other elements proposed within the City right-of-way along First Street must be approved by the City Parks Department, staff and monitor. 4. The applicant is encouraged to continue to explore any other feasible way that the west wall may still be retained as the project proceeds towards construction. ATTACHMENTS: A. Conceptual review packet and minutes. B. Newspaper article of March 27. 1997 5 ALL E MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director Julie Ann Woods. Deputy Planning Director ~ , ,. FROM: Amy Amidon. Historic Preservation Officer RE: 414 N. First Street- Conceptual, Partial Demolition. On-site Relocation. Ordinance #30 DATE: March 26, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicants request conceptual. partial demolition, and on-site relocation approval in order to remodel and make an addition to the existing building, which is a designated historic landmark. A rear yard setback variance (for the existing garage), floor area bonus. and waiver of aspects of Ordinance #30 are also requested. Staff recommends approval of the application with conditions. APPLICANT: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, represented by Michael Ememann. LOCATION: 414 N. First Street. See application for a complete legal description of the property. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section 1 aÂ»4Â·>01Â»Â» 1 n Eat Â»2Â·. 7/ 'M1 4%;iI! 4, exceed those variations allou-ed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant :0 Sec:ion 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: HPC has held numerous worksessions and site visits with the project architect in the past year. and have discussed several issues. including the extensive remodeling which transformed the original one story structure into the current building. and the 1 1 physical condition of the existing ouilding. During these worksessions. the Commission members used a National Park Ser.-ice worksheet to outline which elements of the existing structure have historical significance or define the character or style of the building. The result of the discussions was a general agreement that the site has significance as a historic lard . 1-1,21 A less for its architectural character than for its . association with people who have signincance within the cultural. social. and political history of Asnen (one of the five cr.reia which the City uses to determine that a site is eligible to be a historic landmark. 1 While many other historic buildings in Aspen are associated with a person who has made an important contribution ZO the Community. for instance the Wheeler Opera House. Hotel Jerome. and Pioneer Park I also associated with the Paepkes). each of these structures has Irchil, signiricance as well and retain the r...'-1-Ell . r. integrity of their original design. Similarly. some other landmark structures in Aspen are associated with imporariz local architects. including Herbert Bayer and Fritz Benedict, but those strucaires aiso retain the integrity of the original design. While Herbert Bayer was invoir-:Cl In renovations to 414 N. First Street. it is staff s opinion that the existing structure is a collection o f remodeling efforts ~ which do not successfully represent the original building, the Brown family house, or the work of Herbert Bayer. With this in mind, staffs evaluation of the proposed remodeling of 414 N. First Street which is now presented to HPC views the physical preservation of tile building in a more flexible manner, with less focus on preservation of the exiszing building beyond what is part of the public view from North First Street. Ar the same time, staff agrees with the architect' s approach which allows elements of the new addition to pop up along the street elevation, showing with honese :har the building has evolved into something new rather than treating the street facade as a false front. The applicant has provided as-buiit floor plans and elevations in addition to a written and graphic description of the proposal. A model will be presented at the meeting. Also discussed within the application is a study of the site and the history of the building prepared by the Ememann Group in 1995. Two copies are available for review by the Commission if desired: one copy in the HPO's office and one copy at Jake Vickery's office. In the attached proposal, the architect has retained the west wall of the existing house and portions o f the north facade, retained the existing garage. and proposes to W. rebuild the main roof due to structural concerns. A hip roof form which currently extends from the main ridge towards the alley will be removed (leaving a portion of the existing building as a courtyard open to the sky), and a new addition will be built towards the gardens. For the most part. the existing materials will be retained on the areas of the building which are included in the remodel. The garage will be moved off-site temporarily to allow for the excavation of a basement. and when returned will be placed one foot north and east of its current location io that iI nO longer encroaches into the alley. A small addition will be made to the garage which requires i 4 1 6 inch setback variance. Staff finds the location of the addition appropriate (it is additional storage for the garage) and finds that the variance has minimal impact on tile hisIoric resource or the neighboring proper[ies. As discussed above. staff finds thar the approach generally used on hiSIOriC preservation projects. with the foremost goal being physical preservation of a historic structure, may be viewed with more flexibility on this project. As directed by HPC. the applicant has retained the west portion of the building and the public image of the building as a private :sure. By removing sections of roof and allowing some elements of the new addition to be viewed. there is a subtle suggestion that the building makes a transition within the private area of the site. The new construction is modest in materials and detailing. and because of the tlat roofs. has a low profile which does not compete with the areas of the existing building which will be retained. The existing house exceeds the allowable floor area for the site, a condition which may be continued. per Section 26.104.030(C)(1), nonconforming structures. This nonconformity is due in par[ to the fact that a large area of the site is required to be excluded from floor area calculation because of steep slopes. and in part due to the sliding scale used for floor area which dramatically reduces the floor area accumulated as lot size increases. Because of the large size of the parcel and the significant screening of the site by trees, staff recommends that the requested floor area bonus be granted. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The surrounding neighborhood has numerous historic structures, and the idea of creating a Hallam Lake HiSIOriC District was at one time considered. The great majority of these structures have been remodeled as is proposed for this site. One of the significant qualities of this property Â·within the context of the neighborhood is its heavy vegetation and the notion that it is a private estate. The application has provided a site plan showing existing vegetation and representing that one birch tree will have to be removed as a result of the new construction. The landscape plan -for the site, which may or may not result in the replacement of some existing trees if found to be unhealthv. will be reviewed by the HPC and the Parks Department prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicants' have expressed a sincere desire to revitalize the gardens. which are an important part of this property. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds thar the proposal is successful in conveying the essence of the property s historic significance and place in Aspen's history. 4. Standard: The proposed deve'lopment enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of i designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The building is art eclectic mix of many periods of remodeling and different architectural references. Staff finds that the existing building is fairly undistinguished in terms of architectural character and is structurally deficient in several ways due to the evolution from l one-story to a two-story building. therefore the proposal is not in conflict.with Es standard. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020.C, Standards for review of partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: (For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razingÂ· of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel.) 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to retain approximately 60% of the existing building mass and to add onto the building in the area of the gardens. This is an appropriate location for new construction and the areas to be demolished have been remodeled to a great extent. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: The applicant has addressed these impacts by retaining the majority of the building that is -visible to the public. 4 B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new- additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: This issue is discussed in detail under -'Standard 1" of the Conceptual review ~ criteria. ON-SITE RELOCATION Section 26.72.020.D, Standards for review of on-site relocation. No approval for on- site relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the standards of section 26.72.020.D.2,3, and 4 have been met. 2. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure. and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation: Response: Currently. the historic carriage house (now the garage) encroaches into city right-of-way along the west property line by approximately one foot. The applicant proposes to move the garage off-site temporarily during excavation for a basement. and once returned, place the garage entirely on their own property. Staff finds that the very slight relocation of the building will not negatively impact the integrity of the building or neighborhood. 3. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: This report must be submitted before application for a building permit. 4. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department. as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. - Response: The bond and relocation plan must be submitted prior to application for a building permit. HPC must set an amount for the bodd. $30,000 has been standard for a building of this size. 5 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE #30 The proposal does not comply with several aspects of Ordinance #30 because it is a pre- existing building. The areas of Ordinance #30 which require a variance are: Street oriented entrance: "All single-family homes... must have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window...A street oriented entrance requires that at least one of tile following tWO CondiIionS are met: the front entry door is on the street facade: or a covered entry porch of ifty or more square fee is part of the street facade." Response: The building entry is oriented toward the north, which is its histOriC condition and a condition which HPC requested be maintained in the remodel. Staff recommends this standard be waived. Garages: "The garage must be set back ar least ten (10) feet further from the street than the house. " and "All portions of a garage. carport or storage area parallei to the street shall be recessed behind the front facade a minimum of ten (10) feet." Response: The garage is an existing building and should not be relocated beyond relocation from the right-of-way. Volume: Areas where there are '...facade penetrations between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the level of the finished floor. and circular, semi-circular or non-orthogonal fenestration between nine (9) and fifteen (15) feet above the level of the finished floor" are counted as 2 square feet for every 1 square feet of floor area. Response: Several windows on the existing house violate this standard, however none of these windows violates the intent of tile standard, which was to eliminate areas of glazing which span from one story to the next: therefore staff recommends this standard be waived. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) 6 â€¢ Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant conceptual approval. partial demolition approval. off-site relocation approval, waiver from the Ordinance #30 standards related to "street oriented entrance. garages. and volume.' grant a rear yard setback variance of 4 feet 6 inches for an addition to the garage, and grant a 500 sq.ft. floor area bonus with the following conditions: 1. The garage must be demonstrared to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstraring the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation prior to application for building permit. 2. A relocation plan shall be submirted. including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineeing department. as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair ( i f required) o f the garage, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. The bond shall be in the amount of $30.000. 3. A. landscape plan. which is currently in development, must be reviewed and approved by HPC prior to submission for a building permit. The applicant shall address privacy concerns of the neighboring properties by making every effort to retain a landscaping screen along the south property line. 4. Prior to final approval. the application shall be referred to the Engineering Department. Parks Department, Water Department, and other referral bodies as needed to identify any issues which may delay issuance of a building permit. 5. For final review, a demolition plan shall be submitted indicating which areas of the existing building will be retained with structural improvements, which areas are to be reconstructed, and which areas o f the existing building will be completely removed. 7 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project Name: Lewisi'Posada -cuse Remodel and Additions 2. Project Location: 414 Ncrrh FirsT E-.-et, Aspen, Colorado Leljal Description: Lots A. 3, C. D. E, F, G, H, and 1, Block 55. City and Townsite cf Ascer . - I. - - - . . I.- 1 'with the northerly ten feet of the .Or-C:-.*r alley in Block 55 as described n Quiet Title Decree as recorded in Book 175, Page 300, Pitkin Countv Records. adjacent to said Lots A thru I, and the portions of Lots 1.2 3. 1 5. 6,7,8, and 9 adjacent to said Lots A thru 1, Block 55, which lie '.vithir -allam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen as shewr. cr :Me Willits Plat of 1896, recorded in Book 4 at Page 27 of the the Ptk,2. County Records, and an irregular metes and bounds parcel acjcining :he above described lots on their northerly and easterly boundates. ail of the above being more particularly described as illcws: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of First Street, said ocint being S. 14Â° 50' 49" W., 10.00' from the southwest corner of Lot A. Blcck 53, City and Townsite of Aspen: thence S. 75Â° 09' 11' E.. 292.08* tc a ooint on the westerly line of that parcel described in Ecck 2-6 a: Dage 877; thence along said westerly and northerly lines of said parce, .te following courses and distances: N. 14Â°50' 49' Eâ€ž 1 C.EC N. 33Â° 03 19" E.. 42.2 N. 07Â°19 05" E.. 1 4.20 . S. 70Â° 18 1 E E.. 209.32' to a point of intersection with a parcel described in Eock 32. at Page 373, Book 381 at Page 294, and Book 382 at Page 2.2 3: thence N. 62Â° 39' 00" W., 161.33'; thence N. 74Â° 18' 00" W.. 26.73 : Deed 25.73'); thence N. 82Â° 05' 40" W., 178.19'; thence N. 34Â° 55 17 W., 130.87' (Deed 130.59'); thence N. 09Â° 26' 25" W., 210.13'; thence N. 40Â° 36' 53" W., 5.17', at which point leaving the westerly line of said parcel described in Book 381 at Page 294 and Book 382 at Page 2726: thence S. 55Â° 35' 00" W., 49.81'; thence S. 12Â° 24' 00' E., 242.09'; thence N. 75Â° 09' 11" W., 28.21' to a point on the northerly projection of the west line of Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen; thence S. 14Â° 50' 49" W., along said west line of Block 55 and its northerly projection 184.35' to the point of beginning containing 1.536 acres = all in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 3. Present Zoning: R-6 4. Lot Size: 66,925 s.f. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Jonathan Lewis/Roberto Posada, 414 North First St., Aspen, CO - 970.920.2734 6. Representative's name, address. and phone number: Michael J. Ernemann, The Ememann Group Architects, 720 East Durant Ave. Aspen, CO - 970.925.2266 7. Type of Application: a. Conceptual HPC b. Demo/Partial Demo c. Ordinance 30 LAND USE APPLICATION - ATTACHMENT 1 - p.2 8. a. Description of Existing Uses Single Family Residential with Grage (one structure) b. Approximate Existing Floor Area (measured per Ord. 30,7-304.6). 8,223.6 s.f. c. Existing Number of Bedrooms 8 d. Previous Approvals Granted to the Property: None known other than two previous lot splits undertaken by the Paepcke family in order to convey land to the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies and to the Given Institute. 9. Description of Development Application: The development proposed is a remodel and additions to an existing single family house and existing 2 car garage. The application also includes requests for a 4'-6" rear yard setback variance for an addition to the east side of the garage and for permission for partial demolition and temporary off-site relocation of the garage to facilitate construction activities. 3+0\\0 *A Nist,~Mwk-~44 f n Bcnrocu B M nuin V:cw Dr Ti\AI. 1 tnc- ~~~~ZZ;7~~~~~~~\~~ ~~~~ now Bunn ii . r4 /1 441-; 10 7%2' 1 ASPEN 42 4/ 7 9 El>A \43 1 ,/2- 4.- (4.9 K 2 90& COLORADO / 103/ a - C 9.3. - 3 '/*007 8 G -2- Gilics ie St 1.40 . 1% 2 " -*--- Subject Property P 0.1 % - CE 14 M P Â» Ct .6 + 2 CD 5 - sm _ â‚¬ Pr - ler St *1 ~ ~~~~ - es--Ill- 1 1* 44/4 1 - 4 2 -- 4 89,2 j R) 7 3. eDo - i â‚¬ - Sawmill 5 0 4 4.040 f 3 E <1, n,lv 2. 47 < 3/ * 2 Â£4, r i G Ju 4 '7 f 4-4- 31 3 q b - h / f ;El 3 44 04 + U C. :y,UUM . A 14 0- 1 Groy i CZ 1 0 K.-1 *1 -,1 9 -12 f 1 2 iii We,tview Dr E 1=1 1Â° / a~ 1 19 12 < 1 0 k79#eL c 0 9 1 1 t \ R4~ - 6 0 13 1 t I X i 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ~ 82 1 1 / 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 1/2 MILE 1 1 621119--F= 1 0 1/2 KILOMETER / 1 N 4123 VICINITY MAP 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO ="/40/T 24,0 8 F Gilch 40 Â¥49, 12~ ?M ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada Address: 414 N. First Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Zone District: R6 Lot Size: 66,925 s.f. (36,358 s.f. w/slope reduction) Existing Floor Area: 8,223.6 s.f. Allowable Floor Area: 8,223.6 s.f. (existing) Proposed Floor Area: 8,683.0 s.f. Existing Net Leasable (commercial): N.A. Proposed Net Leasable (commercial): N.A. Existing 96 of Site Coverage: 4.7% Proposed % of Site Coverage: 8.2% Allowable % of Site Coverage 20% Existing % of Open Space: N.A. Proposed % of Open Space: N.A. Existing Max. Height: Principal Bldg: 32 ft. Accessory Bldg: N.A. Proposed Max. Height: Principal Bldg: 32 ft. Accessory Bldg: 12 ft. Proposed % of Demolition: 40%1 Existing Number of Bedrooms: '8 Proposed Number of Bedrooms: 5 Existing On-Site Parking Spaces: 5 On-Site Parking Spaces Required: 5 Setbacks (Assumes Front Yard faces Hallam Lake and Rear Yard faces Alley) Existing: Minimum Required: Proposed: Front: 134 ft. Front: 10 ft. Front: 125 ft. Rear: 0 ft. Rear: (Garage) 5 ft. Rear: (Existg. Gar.) 0 ft. Combined Combined Combined FronUReac 134 ft. FronURear: 30 ft. FronVRear: 125 ft. Side: 0 ft. Side: 15 ft. Side: (Existg. Gar.) 0 ft. Side: 241 ft. Side: 15 ft. Side: 141 ft. Combined Combined Combined Sides: 241 ft. Sides: 50 ft. Sides: 141 ft. Existing Nonconformities or Encroachments: Bldg Ht. 32 ft (existing) vs 25 ft. (allowable) and Side and Rear Yard Setbacks @ Garage (0 ft. existing). Variations Requested: Rear yard setback (5') to allow addition to existing garage. 500 s.f. HPC Floor Area bonus. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: CONCEPTUAL REVIEW 1. SITE PLAN and SURVEY: See Enclosed. 2. CONCEPTUAL SELECTION of MAJOR BUILDING MATERIALS: See Enclosed Building Elevations. 3. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: The development proposed is the partial restoration, partial demolition and construction of additions to the non-street-facing (north and east) sides of the existing main house and (east) side of the carriage house located at 414 N. First Street, Aspen, Colorado. It is intended that the existing street facing (west) facade of the main house, the entire carriage house and the garden wall along the west property line be retained with only minor modification and/or restoration where required. The existing structure is a two-story, wood frame, 8 bedroom house with habitable attic, partial basement, and attached two-story carriage house containing a two-car garage and studio apartment. The structure was originally built in 1887 as a one-story bungalow style house with habitable attic and carriage house. The house has undergone extensive renovation and addition on several occasions since the turn of the century including the raising of the roof and the addition of a second story. As such it no longer is representative of the architecture of late 19th Century Aspen. (Please referÂ·to historical analysis booklet entitled "414 N. First, Aspen, Colorado, 5.8.95" prepared by The Ernemann Group Architects for complete description of the subject property,) The history of the structure has not been one of formative preservation, but rather, it has been one of evolution. Innumerable modifications, some minor and several significant, have been the rule over its 110 year life. The current proposal is for development that continues that history of formative evolution; in this instance with interior modifications and additions to accomodate the new owners' needs. Significantly, however, the current proposal also embraces preservation in that it retains the fundamental mass and character of the house, most notably the facade and forms evident to the street. Therefore, the proposed development will have little, if any, effect on the surrounding neighborhood. 4. SCALE DRAWINGS OF ALL ELEVATIONS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND ROOF PLAN: See 24" x 36" prints of proposed structure. 5. VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: See attached "Neighborhood Context Plan" and photographic panoramas of both sides of First Street. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS for HPC REVIEW for PARTIAL DEMOLITION and TEMPORARY RELOCATION 1. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF THE STRUCTURE PROPOSED FOR PARTIAL DEMOLITION and TEMPORARY RELOCATION: The structure proposed for partial demolition is a two-story, wood frame, 8 bedroom house with habitable attic, partial basement, and attached two story carriage house containing a two car garage and studio apartment. It is proposed to temporarily relocate the carriage house in order to facilitate construction access to the east side of the main house. (Please refer to historical analysis booklet entitled "414 N. First, Aspen, Colorado, 5.8.95" prepared by The Ememann Group Architects for complete description of the subject property.) 2. REPORT FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER REGARDING THE SOUNDNESS OF THE STRUCTURE and ITS SUITABILITY FOR REHABILITATION: See attached letter from Monroe and Newell Engineers, Inc., Re: Paepcke House, 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO, dated June 25,1996. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN and STATEMENT OF THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE OTHER STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY AND THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AROUND THE PROPERTY: The development proposed is the partial restoration, partial demolition and construction of additions to the non-street-facing (north and east) sides of the existing main house and (east) side of the carriage house. It is intended that the existing street facing (west) facade of the house, the entire carriage house and the garden wall along the west property line to be retained with only minor modification and/or restoration where required. The existing roof, however, has been deemed structurally unsound by engineering analysis (see attached Monroe and Newell letter) and will be replaced as necessary. The neighborhood context is one comprised largely of Victorian era houses, some with evident modification and significant additions in recent years and some entirely new houses of consistent residential scale (see photo panoramas of First Street). The proposed development retains the existing form of the west wall of the house and the entire carriage house. Only minimal modification will be evident from the street. Thus the proposed development will have little, if any, effect on the neighborhood around the property. Vall, Colorado Denver, Colorado 1,1 i A Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. June 25, 1996 The Ememann Group PO Box 4602 Aspen CO 81611 Attn: Mr. Michael Ernemann Re: Paepcke House, 414 North 1st Street, Aspen, CO. Gentlemen: As requested, Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. recently conducted m observation ofthe existi:ng house and garage. The purpose ofthe observation was to form our opinion ofthe current structural condition ofthe building in order to provide our recommendations for the reasonable restoration and/or preservation of the existing structure. The house is a two level building with a full attic and a smal basement. The main level contains the living room, library, dining room and kitchen areas. The upper level contains bedroom areas. The attic level is curremly 'used for storage with approximately sixty perceni ofit having the vertical clearance required for habitable space. 'The basement contains laundry and mechanical spaces, We understand the house is approximately 108 years old. The garage is two levels with apartment space on the upper level The house and garage are both entirely ofwood frame construction with wood and stucco exteriors, The portion ofthe main level ofthe residence not above the basement is built over a crawl space. The foundation crawlspace and basement walls are stacked stone. The garage main level and house basement floor are concrete. A review of early pictures ofthe house indicates it has undergone several stnlctural additions and alterations. At sometime one entire level was added to the house and the current attic created. At that time, the stnictural system of the house was compromised with load increases and load paths different from the original construction. There appears 0048 E. Beaver Creek Blvd. . Suire 301 â€¢ P. O. Box 1597 - Avon, Colorado 81620 â€¢ (303) 949-7768 â€¢ FAX 303) 949-4054 to have been two separate si#gle level additions to the south side ofthe house, one of which is the connection to the garage. The exterior decks have been modified. The bick cbimneys have been added and/or modified. Several interior partition walls ofthe house have been modified. In general, the condition of the house and garage is in line with expectations for weI[-used bu&dings oftheir age and construction type. There are floor areas which are out oflevel approximately 2 inches in ten feet. The treads of the stairs to the upper level are not level, There is plaster ceiling cracking in several areas, These condiuons can be attIibutable to building settlement and/or long term sagging of the wood floor and ceiling joists. Our observation determined areas ofthe buildings which for safety reasons require extensive reconstruction, areas which are structurally inadequate, and areas which should be modified to assure continued structural integrity. Specifically, our findings are as follows: 1. The existing roofframing is unsafe and requires extensive reconstruction and/or replacement. Existing roof framing is 2x6(nonEaD joists at 16 inches on center with some spans of approximately 14 foot horizontal Hip beams are single 2xi Where roofjoists spans are shorter, the joists are supported on questionable wood stud knee walls, many of which do not align with bearing waILs below. In our opinion, it would be diniculi to calculate a snow load capacity of20 PSF forthe existing wood framing (versus cument code requiremem of 75 PSE). Evidence o fprevious roof problems include some cracked members and 3/4 diameter tie rods which have been installed on the attic floor to prevent kick-out ofthe north building wal The slick #nish metal Tooling, which prevents the roo f from holding snow, appears to have prevented total roof failure. In addition, the reconstruction ofthe roofto gable ends on the east and west sides from the original four sided hip roofhas changed the loading to the bearing walls and foundations below. Some ofthe building settlement may be the result ofthis. 2. The existing attic floor framing is 218(nominal) at 16 inches. The joists span from exterior waIls on the east and west sides to a centerline ha&way which runs north-south k the building, The maximum span is approximately 19 feet. In our opinion, these joists are marginal for ceiling framing and are clearly inadequate to support attic or habitable space. , They also provide essentially no support for the roof Eupporting knee walls above. 3. The upper level framing appears to be 2x10 (nominal) at 16 inches supported on the east and west exterior walls and the haIlway walls. The maximilm span onthe east side of the building is approximately 15'-6 and on the west side is approximately 22'-0. Current code requirements would limit these members to a span of approximately 14'-0. In our opinion additional support and/or join reinforcement on the west portion ofthe building is necessary, We believe the east side is adequate as is. 4. The main level framing appears to be 2x10(nominaD joists at 16 inches. In the areas ofthe crawlspace we couId observe, they appear to be Supported at intervals appropriate for current code requirements, Beams and cohinins supporting the joists may require reinforcement. Footings for interior crawlspace columns appear to be large flat stones. These should be replaced with concrete footiags. 5, The stone foundation walls appear to be 16 to 18 inches thick and in overall satisfactory condition. Based on good soil bearing conditions the walls appear to be appropriate width for the original construction. A question requiring further consideration is if the exterior crawlspace walls extend below frost depth. Ifnot, they may be contributing to observed sloping floors, etc. 6. The roo f construction of the garage was not visible. Assuming member sizing similar to the residence, reinforcing ofthe roof is required. There is a significant bow outward of the south garage wail indicating deflection of the roo f structure. 7. The upper floor framing inthe garage is 2x10(nominal) at 16 khes spanning 19'-6. These will require reinforcement. 8, The east side exterior porch framing appears to have been reconstructed in the past. This framing may be adequate for residential loading, but is not adequate for cument snow loading. 9. Additional investigation is required to determine the appropriateness ofthe brick chimney support framing. In summary, although it is evident that the structure ofthe house has endured an overload simation for many years, it is our opinion that certain remedial measures must be implemented to ensure not only safety, but also to extend the viable use of the house into the future. At a minimum, it is our opinion that total reconstruction of the roof is required. Leveling and reinforcement of some floor framing is warranted Minor foundation upgrades should also be 1mdertaken. Lauy, We believe that strong consideration should be given to reducing the existing overload conditions by remming the Structure to the design loading conditions present when the house was OIiginaILy constructed in 1888. Thisisto suggest the removal of some or perhaps all of upper level floor areas, waIts and gable roof and replacement with aroof and upper level configuration similar to the original. Our conclusions and recommendations above are based on our visual observation without any demolition to expose hidden framing, without materials testing and without extensive measurements. Modilications to Ols Conclusions and recommendations will surely occur once demolition and construction is initiated If you have any questions or comments, please call Very Willy yours, MONROE & NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. (Â»Le Peter Monroe, P,E. Principal 03/14/97 FRI 11:30 FAI 9709270597 bA relgnual t.nglneers LEI U Ul S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCFUKA/. CONSULIANTS March 14,1997 Page 1 of 2 Michael Ernemann The Ernemann Group Architects c 720 East Durant Av Aspen, Colorado 81611 fax 925-1904 Re: Remodel 414 First Street Aspen, Colorado Dear Michael, This letter is in follow-up to our 3-6-97 rrleeting at the above referenced project site. On site with us were Steve Hansen and Jerry Cavalery of Hansen Construction. The following thoughts were discussed: We performed a walk-through of the main house. The roof structure was viewed at the attic, and revealed typical rafter construction with too few internal bearing points. Members are most likely undersizes for todays snow load criteria. A tension system has been installed to reduce a spreading of the opposite walls, most likely signs of past problems. I would anticipate complete roof replacement Floor structure was for the most part, unavailable 20 view. As is typical with these structures, floors were found to be out of plumb and sloped at some areas. The foundation is observed as grouted stone cobble, with evidence of water damage and previous patch work. Floors may also be best replaced as opposed to attempts to reinforce, as is also true for the foundation. The west facade can be maintained in-place, and will entail extensive exterior shoring and bracing systems. The west stone foundation can also be maintained, yet structure loads best transferred to a new foundation system to the interior. I would recommend that a cantilever foundation system be placed at a safe distance from the interior of this wall. That distance will be controlled by soil behavior and depth of the new footing system. This will result in a backfilled crawlspace along the west side, to reinforce the old wall. Of course with any work of this nature, some risk of damage to existing systems must be accepted. 20 Sunset Drive â€¢ Unit #5 â€¢ Babalt. CO â€¢ 81621 â€¢ (970) 927-9510 â€¢ Fax (970) 927-0597 03/14/97 FRI 11:30 FAI 9709270597 SK Feignial kngineers 441 UUL Page 2 of 2 Based on my offices past experience, a process is feasible to move tum of'the century structures such as this carriage house. This structure is a wood frame, two story, slab on grade building. The main level is a garage, with the upper level used as a study. The actual carriage house roof structure was not available for view. but appears to be a rafter and collar tie system, typical for construction of this era. Final remodel may involve removal and re--construction of the roof structure, to meet current snow load criteria. The process to prepare this structure for moving may involve; removal of the concrete slab, extensive wall to wall to floor bracing, and opening of wall siding low to allow access for moving beams. The extent of internal bracing will deVend on the exact construction type and condition found. The building will then be lifted by an experienced house mover, and moved to al[ow access to construct a foundation system. The house mover will then return the building onto it's new base, and final remodel work can proceed. This process is fairly standard, yet attention to temporary bracing is important. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Stephen K Peightal, PE President cc Jerry Cavalery - Hansen Construction fax 920-3038 97018 Ll SKP/kkp Modern addition to Paepcke house gets commission's OK Sy Ben Gagnon Aor, thIN N-9 â‚¬1Â©r An ultra-modem addition to the historic Paepcb house at 411 North First Street was unanimously appreved Wednesday by the Aspen Historic Preservatien Commi=ion. The project had been more than a year in the making, including extensive consultation with the commission. The pian was drafted by The Ememann Group Aechitects. .Although die Pxpcke house is a histodc landrnart the commission and Historic Preservation Officer Amy Amidon determined that k was made a landmark in 1980 mor. to honor the mercury of the Pacpckes thail fcc any arch=ctural reas an- 'Dle owner yrevicus co che Paepckes was D.R.C. Brown Jr., and his father, D,R.C. Brown, wto crvncd Aspen'p finst bank as well as mining concerns and po'aer andÂ· water companies. Originally built in 188& the home was a one and-a-hâ€¢f story bongnicw, which underâ€¢,ent rmmerous changes over th= decadcs. Amidon said it now lacks "orchitectural integrity." "The house has a very confused character." Amidan said. .. "So we're looking at the project with a little more Gcibility thar wc usuagy do. Thc addition is very modem. but ic'; in a very orivate part of the hcuse that domn't conflict wilh the ceighborhood." Architect Michael E=emann added that "the facade is retained because it evokes memories, md that'; what'; impornint - not th= archiiturc." Allowing the ultra-modern Â»ddition was simoly another. step in the home'i evolution. said AmiÂ£ion and commission members. However, the portion of the home that caa be seen by the public from North Fiat wiLI remain largely unchanged. Thc addinon faces a becrer garden," as some comm=ion members put it. . -This is a very exuberant and visually exciting Â·project;" mid cornmission mcmbo Gilbert Saachez. '-Ihe story of the house is all about evolution and this proposal carries thM tradition on. My only disappointment is the addition is an the secret garden and you can' t Eee it" Commission â€¢=nbcr Mary Hir:ch. with tongue in cheeke added thar growing Ughts :hculd bc retâ€¢incd b front of thc home. "If you really wot the Pagpcke essence. put the pink growing lights back xnd the geraniums," she said. &L Au/-2/6- r ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 414 N. FIRST - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Assistant City Attorney David Hoefer stated that for the record he reviewed the proof of notice and it is legally correct and HPC has jurisdiction to proceed. In addition two letters have been entered into the records. NOTE: 414 N. First has eleven exhibits. Chairman Jake Vickery opened the public hearing. Amy stated that the site visit inside the house made it very clear the exact condition of the building and the changes that have taken place over time. Staff is recommending approval ofthe project including a rear yard setback variance of 4'6" to allow an addition to the historic garage. A 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus. Five other areas need addressed: Landscape plan, relocation plan, and proof that the garage can withstand the physical impacts of relocation. Referral comments are needed from the Parks Department if trees are to be removed and more information is needed about how the structural improvements will be handled. The house has changed from a 1 1/2 story bungalow to a 2 story building. The existing building has very little architectural integrity from the point of view that it does not represent the original building. Windows and different architectural elements of the building don't relate to each other; the building has a confused character. Staff feels the landmark status is related to the people that lived in the building rather than the building itself. The project can be looked at with more flexibility. From the street the house will remain as is. Michael Ernemann, architect for the project stated that they analyzed the history of the house to find out how the house became what it is today and to try and determine the historical value it might have. The house was built in 1887 and completed in 1888 for a man named T.G. Leister who was the first cashier for the Bank of Aspen. He lived in the house until after the appeal of the Sherman silver purchase act which occurred in Nov. 1893. It was then acquired by D.R.C. Brown in 1909. Brown was the founder ofthe first bank in Aspen. Under the Brown ownership the house became a summer house and it had 12 bedrooms at the time the Paepcke's acquired it in 1951. The second story was added and the roof pushed up. There were screened in sleeping porches on the easterly side. The total property was 8 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26.1997 comprised of 21 acres including the land which is now ACES and the Given Institute both of which were given by Mrs. Paepcke. Herbert Bayer and Fritz Benedict, architects made further modifications such as the small porches on the easterly side and a series of changes on the inside. HPC worked closely with the architects in determining what was historic due to the changes. The garage or carriage hOuse has had minimal changes. The house has always had the presence of an estate. The massive west elevation of the house represents the public image ofthe house. Another element was to keep the low wall and entry trellis and the Bayer (German detail) of the kitchen. The carriage house and garage will be kept as it exists. The west elevation and primary roof will be kept. Presently all the trees have been kept. Dan Kiley has been retained as the landscape architect. The garage is quite small and they would like to widen it slightly and need a variance. He also stated that he wanted to remove the structure for a short period o f time while they place a new foundation under it and move it back within the property lines. Melanie asked if the lap pool and workout space was all inside? Michael stated that it was inside and totally underground and has trees all around it. Flowers and lower vegetation will be placed over the pool. Amy stated that the drawings are the current proposal and the model is slightly different. Michael stated that the street side will be retained but they would prefer the little gable if the HPC approves it. The roofing materials would be a product called astro zinc metal. Susan stated on the model the glass pyramid is still remaining and HPC recommended that it be removed. Michael stated that the glass pyramid will be removed. Michael stated that there are quite a few materials on the house as it exists and they would like to remove the stucco and replace it with wood siding but retain the banding. 9 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26.1997 Amy stated Steve Whipple received a notice and asked if a screening wall of trees could be placed on the alley side for privacy. Michael stated that the row of trees will remain and a wall will be constructed to match the existing wall on the west side. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Gilbert stated that the transitions of materials have been handled skillfully. Regarding the gable that faces the street he would prefer to see the shed retained in the interest o f historic preservation. Mark agreed with Gilberts comments and his concern is the structural engineers report on handling the temporary relocation ofthe garage. Michael stated that the site has not been determined. Susan stated she agrees with the comments that have been made and would prefer that the shed roof retained. Suzannah stated that she liked the idea that no more openings would occur on the west side. She has mixed feelings on the gable. The gable is more attractive but the shed is more true to the building. Roger supports moving the carriage house to the west and he would like to see documentation on how the trees will be preserved. Mary stated that she is also concerned about the report on the trees. Michael stated that he is working closely with the Parks Department. Amy stated as a condition of final she would like a report from the Parks Department. Jake stated that the research done was commendable and the project itself was well presented to the Board. Chairman Jake Vickery closed the public hearing. 10 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 MOTION: Mark moved that HPC grant conceptual approval, partial demolition approval, of-site relocation approval, waiver from Ord. #30 " standards related to street oriented entrance, garages and volume, grant a rear yard setback variance of 4 feet 6 inches for an addition to the garage and grant a 500 sq. ft. 'FAR bonus with the following conditions: 1. The garage must be demonstrated to be capable ofwithstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-sitting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation prior to application for a building permit. 2. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (ifrequired) of the garage, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; The bond shall be in the amount of $30,000. 3. A landscape plan, which is curre-ntly in development, must be reviewed and approved by HPC prior to submission for a building permit. The applicant shall address privacy concerns of the neighboring properties by making every effort to retain a landscaping screen along the south property line. 4. Prior to final approval, the application shall be referred to the Engineering Department, Parks Department, Water Department, and other referral bodies as needed to identify any issues which may delay issuance of a building permit. 5. For final review, a demolitionplan shall be submitted indicating which areas of the existing building will be retained with structural improvements, which areas are to be reconstructed, and which areas of the existing building will be completely removed. 6. In addition that the hipped shed roof on the west facade be maintained; second by Melanie. - Discussion of motion. Roger stated that he would recommend that #6 condition be removed as HPC is designing. 11 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 Amended motion. Mark rescinded #6, second by Melanie. All infavor, motion and amended motion. Motion carried 7-0. Michael asked about removing the stucco. Roger stated that materials and removal of materials should be dealt with at final. 17 QUEEN STREET - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Jake stepped down. MOTION: Roger opened the public hearing and continued the public hearing on 17 Queen Street and Conceptual review to a date certain April 9, 1997; second by Susan. All in favor, motion carried. MOTION: Roger moved to adjourn; second by Susan. All in favor, motion carried Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chie f Deputy Clerk 12 Historic Preservation Commission February 11. 1998 Amy Guthrie reported on the CPI conference attended by Gil, Mary Hirsch and herself. Ms. Guthrie said this was a technical workshop. She has some handout to be passed on to the Commission. Amy Guthrie passed out the latest draft o f Ordinance #30, which will be addressed by P&Z. There will be a brown bag meeting with staff and P&Zto go over suggested changes. Amy Guthrie told the Commission she met with the chief building inspector, Stephen Kanipe, about 303 E. Main. The owner of that building had a deadline of April 1 to change the 14 items violated in the building permit to the city's satisfaction. minutes 414 NORTH FIRST Amy Guthrie, community development department, reminded the Commission this is the end of a long process about this property. This is a historic landmark and part of the west end neighborhood. This is the former Paepcke house. .Ms. Guthrie said people have been invited to this meeting specifically for this presentation. The memorandum outlines most of the issues that have been dealt with. Ms. Guthrie recommended approval ofthe project as submitted with conditions that deal with relocation o f the garage onto the site. The garage is currently partially on city right-of-way. Other conditions are landscaping and the west wall, which will be discussed by HPC. Ms. Guthrie said she is recommending a reconstruction of this building as the house is significant mostly for its association with the Paepcke family and not because of its architecture. The structure has evolved from a one-story building into a two-story building and is not consistent in detailing or style. There are serious structural issues. Ms. Guthrie told the Commission staff has asked the applicant to retain more of the quality of the Paepcke ownership o f the site rather than the physical preservation of the building. Ms. Guthrie pointed out the aspects that should be preserved are the west street facing facade of the house; the retention of the carriage house, which is historic from the 1800's; keeping the 1 Historic Preservation Commission February 11. 1998 main entrance of the house on the north side of the building; keeping a garden wall along North First street; maintaining the gardens as part of the property; maintaining an overall sense of the mystery and privacy o f the property from the street. Ms. Guthrie noted one item that has changed since conceptual review is oval stair tower which has been removed. Some materials have changed. Ms. Guthrie said these are positive changes to the design. Michael Ememan was sworn in by deputy city clerk Kathy Strickland. Ememan said the staff has forwarded progress on this project to P & Z and Council, both of whom were invited to this public hearing. Ememan said he was originally retained by the current owners to do a historical analysis on this property. A booklet was compiled on this analysis. This analysis explains how the building became what it is today on the site. The building was completed in 1888. The house was a one-story bungalow with a small attic space. The person who had this house built left by the turn o f the century with the repeal o f the Sherman Silver Act. This house became the property of the Brown family in 1908. It was used as a summer house by the Browns. The property used to be 21 acres and is now 1.5 acres. There were lots splits in order to give land to the Given Institute and to ACES, leaving 66,000 square feet. The Browns added the second story. Ememan said at that time there were hip roofs that skirted out and large sleeping porches on the east side of the house. There are 2 real estate brochures from 195 1 when the property was sold by the Browns. At that time, the house had 11 bedrooms and was used by extended family. There was another house on the property, the Potter house, which has been moved to the southwest corner of Triangle Park. This house was on the property when it was sold by the Browns. The Paepckes acquired this property in 1952 and began their own renovations. The first of these was the removal of the sleeping porches and the hip roofs. The carriage house was also changed, as evidenced by the real estate photographs. There was a shingle roof, which became a metal roof. The porches on the east side of the house were changed. Ememan said the house has gone through a very evolutionary process over its 110 year history. Ememan said they would like to continue this evolution. When the owners first began thinking about redoing the house, they had no preconceptions about what to do with this property. The applicants met with HPC to see what ideas would be acceptable. One idea was to 2 Historic Pres~rvation Commission February 11. 1998 take it back to its original small form and build out into the garden. This was not acceptable. Ememan reminded the Commission there were field trips looking at the structure, filing out the National survey on preservation. The general conclusion was that the house had very few distinguishing architectural qualities and to preserve it for architecture was not warranted. To preserve the essence of the property and the essence of the Paepcke legacy became the issue. Ememan said some recommendations from this process were to maintain a north facing entry. The entry on the north side faced the street when Lake avenue when by the lake and by this property. Another issue is the history o f this property being very private. The idea of maintaining the mass of the house as an obscuring device so that the mystery prevailed is one that everyone favored. Ememan said the essence of the property is not the house but "the property" and preservation of the gardens and open space made a lot of sense. The large window in the dining room should be preserved. Other openings in the westerly wall can be changed. Ememan said the applicants have agreed to retaining the shape and volume of the roof. There are severe structural problems with the roof. It is rated at 25 pound per square foot snow load holding capacity. The current code is 3.5 times that so the roof had to be rebuilt. The carriage house is pretty much intact and the applicants have agreed to retain it in its present form with a small addition on the east side off the narrowed alley to gain access into the basement. The applicant has agreed to keep the west elevation intact. After these agreements, the applicants and HPC had 4 work sessions prior to conceptual review. There have also been sessions since conceptual to deal with technical issues. The design was presented to HPC at conceptual. One of HPC's comments was about the oval glass stair. This has been removed and becomes rectilinear. Another concern was for the pyramid skylight, which has been removed. There was a vaulted roof over the master bedroom, which has also been deleted. The overall architecture has been calmed down since the conceptual presentation. A metal roof will be retained. Shingles will be fabricated from the metal that are similar to those up there. These will be less reflective than what is currently on the roof. The applicants have been concerned about the number of materials in the house. The design team has tried to clean this up some. One thing is to change the shingles in the. pediment to square-edge shingles. This continues the more 3 Historic Preservation Commission February 11. 1998 horizontally directed linear surfaces on the house. There is a band of stucco on the house that will be replaced with wood siding. The proportional break ups of the building masses will be kept with trim boards, but the materials will be changed. Erneman said for technical reasons, it has become impossible to keep the rubble wall under a portion of the house. Theapplicants will replace this with a concrete wall and restucco the wall so it is consistent with what is seen today. The roo f will be to the height that exists today and exactly the same pitch. The chimneys will be encased in the pre-cast pieces, currently these are pale grey brick. These elements will continue to have a masonry appearance. An outstanding issue is the westerly facade. The applicants have addressed this as a technology issue. It was agreed in a work session that this facade could be removed and rebuilt, taking the existing siding and skin off the building and trim, cleaning the trim and replacing it. The applicants felt this may be alarming to residents and are exploring other methods for this facade. Erneman told the Commission they have had asbestos tests done. There is a layer o f building paper directly behind the siding on the west wall. If this paper is with asbestos, the wall will have to come down in order to remove this building paper. Erneman said the applicants feel this wall should come down regardless of asbestos or not. Ms. Guthrie noted she would like the applicants to continue to look at maintaining the west wall Erneman said currently snow does not stay on the roof; it slides off the metal roof and does not create a load on the roof. The applicants are going to put in an insulated roof. Heat through the house will no longer cause the snow to melt off the roo f. There will also be internal gutters on two edges of the roo f and putting snow retention devices to hold the snow so that it does not slide off onto persons. This will create a much larger load on the roof, so the applicants have to increase the holding capacity because of the building code and because they do not want the roof to fall in. The north facing entrance is a difficult condition because it is the cold side of the house. The flat entrance is a way to protect people entering the house. Erneman noted in alpine structures, the entry is always on the gable end o f the house rather than on the eave end. This entry has evolved over time and this is an attempt to solve its problems. Ememan noted they have retained a famous landscape architect from Vermont as part o f the design team. The landscape drawings include his ideas. They are 4 Historic Preservation Commission February 11. 1998 retaining the wall along the westerly property line and will build a new wall along the south property line. This will help retain the privacy and estate nature. Ememan presented the drawings as part o f this presentation. Moyer asked if any trim or siding on the west end of the house has been removed. Erneman said they are cutting holes through the plaster and have removed some trim for asbestos testing. Ememan said the elevation drawings show what the materials will be and where they will be located. The pre-cast goes on new structure, not old structure. Ms. Reed asked for any public comments. There were none. Moyer said he would approve the project as submitted, agreeing with items 1,2,3 in staff memo, delete the 4th, that the west wall should just be taken out, and #4 should be reworded that the west wall should be rebuilt with details retained to the existing scale and would include the original dining room window opening Moyer said the siding and trim on the west wall are not historic. Moyer said when he worked on the project years ago and removed some of this trim, there were no square nails. Sanchez said he likes this refined proposal and supports staff s recommendations and Moyer' s comments. Mary Hirsch said HPC is preserving the historic and cultural landscape of this property and making it better. Ms. Hirsch said with work from the HPC and the property owners and design team, the community can be part o f this and it will be exciting to watch the progress o f the project. Susan Dodington said this project will be well done. She was concerned about the west wall but understands the safety issues. Ms. Dodington said there should be pictures or an explanation of what is going on with the property on the property for passers by. Heidi Friedland said she approves of moving forward with this project. Jeffry Halferty said the applicants and design team have done a good job preserving this site and it will be a great project. Moyer moved to grant final approval to 414 North First street with the following conditions; 1,2,3 as written by staff and changing #4 to state that the details of the west wall will be retained with the existing scale and to include the original dining window opening as it exists; seconded by Ms. Hirsch. All in favor, motion carried. 5 Historic Preservation Commission February 11. 1998 Erneman told the Commission their objective is to get the house back under roof before next year's snow season as the weather could cause a lot of damage to what they are trying to preserve. 6 - ./2~ - r lilli --- - /'ll 1 L =6= i i ia l t~: 1 /-1-4 1 .6.-3.1 1 L 1 ' ' 41 Â·'r-rr.. 1- - ! till 1 Ill / T 1 11 *1-tr.lillillill,1/,1 1 1 1 11 ~ 1 . JE Ii; 4 -11 1 -1 East North I LL ; 11 '1 Er-i L .-. 0 0 U -- 1 1 -. â€¢ i 'r--1 f 'I- 1 i 11 4 4 1 #-rr# r- ti 11~El X#*l - 1. West South Existing Building Elevations RAIL_! 050 23 11 u W Â¥ W W 11 W W Willl Â¥UU WWUWWW Wwy WWW UNWW 'u / 1, W.L.7825.2 t. / 1 A / - 1/ .*f. -- -A- 830- e - -4.0. A. . E. S. - W. L.. I *a,1*A~ ~ W.L.7826.4 1 7822 7 j / -'tir#'itillillill:ligr \314 \ " -t.\4*31*: 1 -J t-'.377 - . 'f-lop-2 142'.- 4#WIQ 1, 441\ 1 / p . 2 \ <473 e -/6 \11 144 +ic V ' a .. 1 14Â» , ~ 32--0 1 1 -490 41Â« -------10------ - ;<7837.1 <ZIIZ~ k C \. uh tÂ« 1 Â¢-4 X' , X\\ .Ii## / - 7841.7x TRIANGLE P~RK A .840 h C \ \4 - - x 7877.9 1 .-3 -0' -- 0 , - 33 r /1r-7 - -- --- 1- - - 0 --- / 2-- -% ArGZE 1\\ - 1 --4 -1/- /--7 / 4 -7 L ~_~,,-2 7879.3 - - -- , \X\ /9 1 - 111} r de:74- 78@~~ 4 1 r f 1 tri / e / 7\ V 17878.4 : ~-4-1 /x 7879.6- D ~1--r- ~ n 5 r-J 0 =V 4.frl i : B 5,49 i. Â«t x 7881.2 7882.9x Fo r , 1 4 . ~ 7879.42 5.-:: ' 1- LA~AL--11_ t.... Â· rm /8 - 1 -. . ~7881.2 01 1 <i' L__~Â·cy .~.~~ ~.. V, 4- . h :1 1 1. p m :\ ~ i 41. . 1 ,$ 1111 }1 - r- 1 . -04 1 .... -- 1 X ~ Existing Building >Â·2 252--~ CO ' GIVEN iNS-E -- 7 . 15- Iri Ill m - 71 ~ Proposed Building l-Uz-~ 2 LL \ T 7- 3 40/9 7882.6 ~ ' F9 Entry - 1 1= - ~f l )N 7 <<0-0 c -- 1.ki/ :RÂ»ICE ST. N=Ej rsf-St - 1 ~ Parking X 7881.5 h _ I~ - ~ 1~Ap-f/h borhood BlpckÂ·~Plhn/,//>~'.-\i-- \ 1 1 9 \ 1 j i r--h ht ) \ \ - - r--- i Sto. sto. 1 m Ext Wd Sh. Mtl. - 2 10- I - 1 1 ~ 4-2-9 re Mt!. 1, Mt!. ~ t-r--ir-=-3 11 - 1 Mt! Ext Sto. Ext Sto : i-=====Rxt stor=====T Â· :Ii I ~ - 17-lt/TJgETTE- -/- t~~ T~ij~ # ~1~- 1 , 1 1 / I .- - ~~ Ext Wd Sh. 1 - * - 4 ..----Â· ====LL - 1 -- Ext Wd.-- Â·Â· 2--- - i-T~ Wd. j - - -722- Ext Wdr~ 1-~-----L=..1 ~JI~~z~zn' 1.1...... a 11 -- - Â· I : I . *.-1 1 .- 1~--El , ~~ - r=====--------Ext wd -~1 r------1 1, 11 "==93 ---1- 1 - 1...4.9 f i m 1 ' 122:124 -- tz! d ' 2 I Ext Sto. Ext Sto. Ext Sto. 311/4-2 - -, It 4 /4450 Ext Sto. Existing Stucco Sto.. Stucco k-5 Ext Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding Ext Wd. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles Mtl. Metal WEST ELEVATION Stn. Cut Stone Panels 1/8"=1'-0"- - A C=71 Sto. 1 1 1 Sto. Mtl. ---=Illit=,3 Â·AÂ· % . 4 ' V. Mtl. -2.:re.. 7. .1 . Sto. 1 7â€¢ I. ..' I & Sto. ' L ~ | Ext Sto. Ext Sto. 2/&74. . WI--I-I. Mti. 1 2-E-- -- 11 - -- i. - 11 - .A It 1- 1 : 1 1.- - _27 1 - -- . 1: -- Sto. : StrL ! Stn. 1 ii CLE*UN81 -- 1 1 i 1 4:.t.i: Ext Sto. Existing Stucco Sto. Stucco Ext. Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding Ext Wei. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles Mtl. Metal NORTH ELEVATION Stn. Cut Stone Panels 1/8"=1'-0" Sto., I Sto. 1 M ti. F .- 1 -4 9 i . Mtl. 1 Mtl. i Ext Wd. Sh. I tl. 1.-I- I L 1 rE 1 i I Sto. p Sto. 1 JI 134 - - - - Ext Wd - r Mtl I = Mt'.U -~.-...--~=6-- -2-5:/ -: 2- .1 Â· Â· --110/2-1~-2 1 9 MU .'2' Stn. 'wl = Sln - 1 - 11 0 - - Ext Sto. Existing Stucco Sto. Stucco 9 Ext Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding 1 Ext Wd. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles Mtl. Metal 1/8"=1'-0" EAST ELEVATION 1_Stn. Cut Stone Panels . 11 1 a LO. .1 7 7 -ild ..--- 1 *:LA-4 . , e 1 1 ~11:41 Mtl. I-'Â¢*1 Sto. '111 1 .I il.... f-- Mtl 1 - =#===- ER - Mtl 9 ' i Sto. Sto. Sto. -. Le-1, ' r All.*59- p 1 1 Vt , : ,/11 A--- f 1 1 -.' 1 MU ir::I / Sto. ' Sto. 9-MI .4 -- 1 m . , l ' 41 .7 J -,-U.1 - .... ' *49-4 \ I i . imil.:-1, ..5Â¢g=*:t....2=~ . t , 2.9- L "31 ..i- i - r r 0 0 0 d . t.- Â·1Â·1' . 1 I - I"...= Ii.--- - Sto. -- --- --- Stn. - I .1 1 --V .... 4. .6LI .- I 1. -4 t Sto. Existing Stucco to. Stucco Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding Wd. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles SOUTH ELEVATION Metal 1/8"=1'-0" Cut Stone Panels 4! ce~~Â¥, m~A'!,Â·Â¥);Â· L A Â·,t ;0 1>, *. i RECEIVED PO FEB 1 9 1998 LE POLEHOUSE | ADMEN / ril KIN DOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT \34 1.. 9 - Â«\\3\1 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP B-- ift = 8 -I... 414 N. 1st STREET-, ASPEN, COLORADO - \tifi Â«a- ....- --/1 - . --- .a-- .-/... . ./........I---. 1 -- :Z/9 1.85= - 2 .....i- 2 11 1 - A-* cof'ER RIN El'-00'51"4. Sla/6 |lii *-\ ~=:" i/i* ' , , i:E - U - i bi Â· ...%/ --/ .-7 tt AL# >4- SMUGGLER ST. - 0 - C - 6Â§ 4. 0 -- 94 N. Ast STREET f Â¢ 1 - . r- .Z V \ .2 : 16 . i -.4\ I 9--Â» / Put - .. is 1 3 -.11:Â¢:*36,1,1'llim) S=--rht/1,221.2 - 3 -4 - 4 6 =1 rl - GRAPHIC SCALE -- f,-97.~- -inE)%9 - 1 5 f.-) MaIM Sâ€¢Q ' ./.r Â£ ..I 937091 .- 1/- Dâ‚¬IT, , 1 ! 1 R 6- .- i . 1.,4 . )413 - 4 C . 46*.... PO RE'Z c Â·4-9 FEB 1 9 1998 LE Abrcle, tri .u:Â·. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLEHOUSE .a-- -- 4 j NKÂ·Â·22Â·\N" < :ic:VE ?64\ 9%24 --- - 1 \\. \31%44\ \\ \.......44%.6 \ .. ..Â·4\431 .., 4.'.:\Ir:i ' 433.11/ , \40 .3>38%~Â». \ ./1 .'992/:231#SEEISEIi:BEZL-Â· ../....Ir:Irrl.. -- - - /-/'..5,0.* c.--- Â«3%(f,&41---I---W .' ./.ia.\â‚¬10.04Â·... 91-- I . -1~2: 0 1'7 -\Â»~>tjAT--- =q-------- -4 -- 1 1 U\ 7% )22Â«2:4 - - 1 lilli 11 - =aun - UL- 1 - . /4 5 'e\ R----M L. - N . \1 . 1 ............ . . 1 A t-b -- 1.'*Ano"11/I'.0,4 / , t (.... 1............../ %~;.<.*-C------ fircu.'1 U'Nltl!11.LIVIE~"NI 3'1''jl!~C h '' - 91- .i inli/ - 95%,-y~rr~h : .0 t---* 4-....d..=-=a.C <fj,//t> . /9 . 6 7 9 ,-I., 4 .91 / --- - 0..=... O,r -Illill -0 . I ...... - - . I &/ ...1.. - 'll.... -- ' . I.... 2:'Â·- ft.41 L-- \XÂ»..--- . - LÂ·f -2-'-Al - \ t. 1 222.--ma==ZE' ..1 1 1 11. U - - - - ....1 3/E MAN 41 fil i li/li 9 1 F 4 /1 r . - E-Â© 1 1 " D ..t--- W 719 11 1 1 37 1 , 11. 1 ~ r j---- i' LIE 1 $ 1 : 1 --1 . | POLEHOUSE~ 1 1 1-3 -7 ' IL- 1 1 ---- lilli. 1 ! r,d r * e " w ..............., .- J It _06 .-6 -u,-.. 'a-- 1 ED * 4 .m.1 1 ---- ...I'..'-. â‚¬~'El 1 1,1. 1, 8 --1 el el 1 11 1 1 Q I r.. ....- 1 ---1 11 il I --DE I @ 1 /0-X 1 â‚¬ l_-1-1 1 i Ii--- .... ! 20 -L â€¢-1. r-\ 1 . 1 r.--7 4,-L 1 -- - -~ 2 '-- C -1 .-OLe-~.IC, ...'..'- 1 1 11 --- 1 1 7 -1 - 4 -- 1 Â«LU=Â«31Â«_1117 - - -*--- 1 3. ELÂ»-1.11 lili .1 1 1 1 1 1 -------7 - E-=1 -,Â· -9-- 4 - -r- -t0 1 ..1 1 1 % 4-4------ 1 I. 1 1 1----4-1-4 . l '1 . 1 L . 1 0 1 e 4-ju 1 . . If' Ii,-1 0 j 1 : 61 E-7 1 1~ I , q 1 , Â·ta- :1 -1211,ill:Eld... r 1 1 -1.Â£1 1 7 ii G 111 1 ....i 0 T r--A --F . 11Â¢ 1 .1 1 E ==r _141 - REC-' E oÂ«/ k.4 1 :r..2......../ L - 11'! i 1 1 4 i FEB 1 9 1998 2 11 - C 1 Â® 0 1 1 Â· --r Atir-Cri, ri : iâ€ž1, 1.. 1 1 . 1 *+ . If .6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM= 1 1-t=L ' . 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 . *1 1 1 1-1 11 - 9 + 1 1 . 1 e @ 0 01- 4 1 6 2 1 :-telf .4 ; 1 M lEI - 1 1 . 11 ---1 1 I.Ii....I'. .....W 11 . 1 11 11. - 1 t If Â® 1 1 1- - -4 -- i Â· i-42---PE ....... 1 . il- 1- lili . B 1 1- - 1 .........=6 11 1 11 - L t1 1 :1 1 . 1 LOWERLEVELFLOOM!:AN L. . 0 0, 0 - l,9 + if, , 7/ ..1 -7-=----=ER--31 1 -t 1 --- t 1 0.- ZI I P]Q - LIE 1 1 -11 - 44 d j j 1 1 ' 1 F - br 1 ..--*.0-=I.'-IN- 6 11 --- . 0 1 IE â‚¬ . 1 --- G ! POLEHOUSE i , 1 , ~.--2 'led 1 I i .1 1 10 1 Ikclh--- -- ; i . 11 1 - U I.., 1/ 1 31 1 1,1 1*#T--.iÂ¥ 11 lili ----=:%,re-,L- 1 1 - 12! L. 1 111-4 11 1 :':1:21.- =0 i UL I Fi i 1 1 1% - 1 1 --1--Irr- 7-M 5 - 3 /2 21*-f'----=..1/.1. --.-- I -1 1 1 =0-*0165549 --- 1 ..'.'-/.1.- 1 1 ti,.~,-7- T.-11-F -;--r-,i .....1 , 1 >1 1 11 ,~ Â£14 Â·' Â»iy; L --- 11 1 it 1 1 11 P 31 1 1 '! Iii, i I '1, ...I.0--...i.- 1 1 .--- :--f -- ti : -1- -7 F-- -+ 2 1 --- -1 - 1' 1 111 ./ 1 ~ .0-- , 1 1 Â·12 1 i z. . 11! i 1 -Â· -ft 7--TT-TUT 4 4 . rif/-1--* .....6.9.. b i IFGERPÂ¥ I 2, . 11- , -,--'133- '----9-,R,'-f I | 1 I.r , i 1 - .-f---- I 1 r-----1 1 I C 1 1 $ : 31 41 . 2-1 --4-21!U Â· '1 ' --r- i 1 3 -! |.1 1 ? IiÂ»i j , 1- il: Â·1-T--MT-/1-T li - 1& 1 :11 0 1 --- -- lilli 77- - - - ' 4' 1'1 ; L -1 . 71 -- ---- W 1----1 T-- lili lili 1: I . .4 1 1 -rl , 1 9 1 G! i , -- 1 :W I -------il ----Ii-- 0 -0 -I.-I- 6--- -------. 11 11 ---m,"1.. ..,- 14 * .4 ;* t -ir,i'.4, '4 1 1 ; ,w. 4 -- 1 1 1 1 I. 1 - lu 1 L 1 1 tj =2-I- 1 i~ T~ ~ i i :1 Â·. E- d'laft =.10.1 =- ! I i Â·-- ; .~21!60*1(3 1 1 14 -- '...&--Il : I.- 1 1 11, =-11 . i 4 ----- Â¥1 Â·' .. 1 11 1 (64 '1 ! - 4, , 1 -- .1 i TH- -- f ri T~ 1-1 Gr!'*'TEâ€¢ AU, NT-Ic,~ UIAL.La TO ee /1 - - -- Zill' 1/7- GÂ¥/. 80. EACW SCE -- 1- 0 11111 lili 2,10~_ 1 . 1 11 ,; 1 i itili,i 1 /- 1 , L -VJ 1.. , 13.H fill . Â¥ 1 m . 1 Th E- . --- d I .4/ w - - ' 21% 1- 1 - :1=- It'. 4 , r- T - 4 -2 - ill 1 ~ ..: if IIi= 1 1 cgfuurip~-3-3 1 /6 , 1 ..1 -*F-./.-./.I- -â€žr-- -- -----~ 91 1. ENrRY LEVe. FLOOR PLAN 1- - 1 Il ..f 1 1 1.-_1_ , 2- IL~ il=-11_LL-=~li ull i <9 1\ 1, , r lilit I .li e-- . 1 1 - 11 1 1 3 . .# 1 -/ .il .2 i .// L.Ii_li=---â€¢-71 =- 1191 / L_=L_.1 1 4 i Ill:Il N I i It I /11 \ - r=--1 1 C , 1: I 1 1 6 1\ 4. / d 11 1 1 i- . 1/-- 1- -- -------- --- -- --*------ - 1 f ' 1 - - 4 1 A3.2 1 1 04 1 RECEIVED FEB 1 9 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : i J, PIO 11- 1 .-1 FI'T=Frat.- U.lEi 1 1 LIE 1 1,1 1 I:li l \1 1 Il Il ~ 1 POLEHOUSE 1 1.-4 i 11 y /TY Â¥ 1 -I.I.--- 1 74-2---- 1 1 6- 1 4 , 1.1 IT I ==-1- 11-1~ M... - 5 .7-FT- - 1 11. 1 9 1 9 1 EmEE._ -- -Il.- 1 Pa--1 =i... 2 - 1 -- â€ž 1 -2!n.0./.'.."/82 11 1 1 = ~1 111 1 1- 19 1 g --- --- 2 - 8, /4 - 1 1 1 I. .4.- -=- 3.. ==U 4- 4 ~ -- ... 1 lei 1, 1 =.1 =.2/ 7 ../r . =14 i 1 1 1\ il , EXTENIC- 1 -- â€¢--6 64 .*.-W... - - - :1 . U.â‚¬) r. - 1 . 1 1 ./ 1.. I Â¢1 11 ' ' 6 -1 -9 --1 -*- 1 | 1 1 -1-L I H , -- I lili 11 1 1 . I - 14 1 ... ' 4 te -./ - & 1 1 : 1 1 Y- 2- 1 1 4 1 --- - 1 - 0 1 1 1 -1 ' e i :1 =-13 M-=-*- 1 1 6-r k , , -7 i ~. I. 1 â€¢.r . 1 ~-Mt--7- 7 h 1 1 1-- [15 64 .1 1 0 1 ..---/ 5 , 1 1 [DE 1 4 â€ž6- - 111 1 11 11â„¢ 101 0 19 --- 1-1Â® 11 - , m 1 44 1 1 .10 1 =7 1 1 2 1 ... .a 12_Ill 1%%4-63'.-telm J 1 - _ __ 1 1 7 4 -i 11 -â‚¬ 1 1 Ti - 1 ; , 11 11- 1 f il--- 1 I T- - - - - 1 . 6 1* 1 1 1 19- 1 -- *:! 1 ---4 1 2*1 1 --- 1 1 L 11 219 1\1 ---- 1- - 1 -7 1 1 -- 11 1 1 1 F ' *1 ' ' 11 b 1 1.--- 4 il 1 1 1 1 li 1 j. 11 d 1 1 1 111 - ...1-,10= 1 1 1 - ' VA-Ilit/#1 ' FEB 19 1998 RECE'v=r A3.3 114 1 1v,- iN / 71 1 AliÂ·; COMMuNITY DEVELOPMENi I. al f 0~0-0-tle 9 9 2 -:1,--~~ PO 4 1 , al-<17-2 TeÂ®f f LE 9 -111 1-,---A _ tell --- ---- .42 4 -:-!t A- -- -1 1 1 1 1 _. -r-- M POLEHOUSE /T 1 1~ 6--Spr , -0 11 - L _ 2~ * ~ 1 Li e---El 1 0 4 1 44-9 / I 1'~ e - 1=-Il 93 1 R -- --- I -,11 1 11 --0-ff-\ 1 , 11 1 11 7, 6/4--El 1 -0 i i Â£-1 --- 1-1 1 Q - 1.1 11- -- -i 1-l--d~ --. : 1-9 -- -I--I'l- 9 1 -0 PARTIAL ROOF PLAN 32 -f *- ** **Il--n. . -- I . 1// + W Â® e ,\ 1/ 1 -44 -- -1 / \1/ 1 - ~L~i- 4 16+--- L/ - --- -79 - - /[\ A . e / 1 - 1-- h el 1 - 337<EJ33>NORD>TEEED>FOX 3 1 1. . . 2 8 011 \1. 1 1 IiI .- 1 e 4 e -1.4 ilt ~ _go ~ I -g-_ \\11 2/ - -4 \ 1 i lic ROOF PLAN -- \ ,1 / I - -0 ,---- ni .*L.. 2 I - 561 j 1 1 1 1 w ZOLD- ROC~ RECF",f- - .1'N L--- 1 6~ i.el 1 1 + 4 FEB 1 9 1998 A3.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 99 9 9 Â» -~ --- Â£-- ~ . plo -' 0 2. 14'** 1 -54 1 - I/ 1 1 1 .u 7 L1E cIT .1 1 1 IÂ©-1 '' - 1 , A .72'. 1 .- 1 ' 1 . , -- . 1 . 1 I r I , -, ce 1 .2 4 1 . 1 71"1 POLEHOUSE - - 1.- - 2.2-- 1 1 1 - 6. 8--3 -- ./-- -Â·- 1 f - --r- - A , ~ f ~__ 9.... - 1 1 h ==-L . : =- --- -- Pal- - -5.-. . 1=4611 r~it.. 7- --- t. - | r illi====--n= ===n=======7-=1 - 1 0- -Il---0-------I----0----Il---4*.1- - -a T . - - . . . . ... . . .1, 1 1 !1 -4 - 1- ./. /,/ i. /1. .1 i... 1 - t : ' i I ~ Â· - 1 - 1 1 1 1 , 1 - 11 1 ,/ - -T 1*1 1Â¥â€¢~~- --- l' 1 ./ -,---r~.... - ..I-Il - t I Â· 1 1 _ , 77 -- -~3222--p A' - 11 11 .-I.,I. l 11 1 11 ! iii ! It 1 ....... 11 iiI 1 i .-- L---------------------LU----4-------------------------4--1---------------------------- t-- - FUY---------------------------41 - -4--Ii 1 . , 1 1 , ----0------------------------ 1 EAST ELEVATION c '1@F:'.0-= . IliA,1.,4/81:.ranc,0 Â» 9 ?T. -9 1 1 - 1--4 1 1 ~r Â»-i 1 1 1 1 . 1 1-121 1 - 1 =11 -1 1 -- --- 1 -- Ir t 1 -1 ' I. -/ 1 ' ....'ll-'ll-..=I.-Il=.Il-* 1 - r- ' 242-' 1- 1 1 ....... . -- T *ilill- I. *::g----REE==4 1#==-- M- -r-3 2 1 - --- --- 1 @ 'â‚¬, tpl,~ :-e- - 2.---*;I--*-I- - *- - -. --- -i-.I*.il-- 1 -2 1.-- ./ - 1 -- 1 .... I.'ll-/% 1 - - .... . t----t == - --\ - --- --0-- -1---------- -- 1 1 Iii / 11 IIi 1 11/ i 1 1 1 --4 4------------------4 4 ---- ----------------911 4--------------------.-J -- ---W 1- ..0.0.28.Â»e i â€¢ ----1 1 1,1- 1 U *-*...../..I- 1 1 WESTELEVATION 1 1 1 11 - lit , 11 1- 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 11 1t r-:------------- --------------------------------------------u---7-------------------------------*,v--- [M.1 LL-------- ---------- -------------------------_--- --_----- ---_ .._._ --_--------JJ 9-'--*-'-*--0 g e r- 1 - FEB 1 9 1998 ADrÂ· ...... Â· COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f 17?T : R-LO 1 . 1 ---- LIE 1 1 POLEHOUSE 1 1 . 1 1.f.ZIINICE:22- I-./..'I- I.& - ..i- 1 1 --. 1 --- -I -- 4.- ' ' I.w -i_J -- 11 1 - --- ----- ---- Ill-4/2.--- . 0 1.- -- 1, 1 3===P=h - ./-- - - - I---- -- el- ----0.-I--' 1 -- -- . - + L - - ... ======n. - 1 1 ..2 , - 1 - i I 1. - -- - 1--T- 0,~ -- 11 .1- 1 1 1 1 - - 1 - -~ -- b ~2 11. -- - -- . -Ill--Ilt====-4/aky/,Il- -- 1 K 1.-2 1 ' NORTH ELEVATION - - -- - I - - ..... 1 1 . 0 --- T 1 i .-1 1 7- i 4 INT - 21 ./--I.*./.-*Il...-Il.'I- -- 1 111 .. 2177;T' r' 1 1.1- 1- ' 1 1/ - --- , 7 1 1 1 1 -1-f 3 : --- 1- 1.1 JU=Â«47=1 1 17- .1 11 - 1 T . 1,1-i -1-- 1 11 1, 1 1 . . 11 1 r-=-27 1-'1 1 -- |-/7--Â·- - -2 , =ZEZEZZL [-,2/2/22//7 - . - . 1 -~+AÂ¢ZZZIEJ-T- . i 1 . i i ta. --- ,-440 ' ' 4- 1 :-1 1 , i... .-"..'.- - -- -W---- - -='*I L L-4-2 -7 =7 5 In 11. 1 4 49 -4 - ; 0 1 4---T--lIZ~t-Er E-Z . D - i & 11 Â· ' E-/f ' - -- ' L 16.. . 1, 1 1- %-1 . # 1 6-) - - - -'"I'l,-- 1 1 | 1 &211 1 | : 1 1 11-11 1 - - 1 '_L..Â·â‚¬7 ......I- Â·~, 1-1 1 -77 1 . -77-7-r-'1Â«-rT--1'- ' -7 ' 9 i r i e I 13- 94.- , 1 n 1 -Â· tr' 11 .--- 41 ~.3*1525:ty=, *2 1-- _ ~ft- -- 4 - [7-71 1 1 A4.2 S.9113.H_ELEVAT ION R 3 r 47. FEB 1 9 1998 1 . . COMMUN:TY DEVELOPMENT Ill--Â© -iL â‚¬ - I *#fâ‚¬Â¥EXil:Brr -*Mill MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director ge/. FROM: Amy Amidon. Historic Preservation Officer RE: 414 N. First Street- Conceptual, Partial Demolition, On-site Relocation, Ordinance #30 DATE: March 26, 1997 49 SUMMARY: The applicants' request conceptual, partial demolition, and on-site relocation approval in order to remodel and make an addition to the existing building, which is a designated historic landmark. A rear yard setback variance (for the existing garage), floor area bonus, and waiver of aspects of Ordinance #30 are also requested. Staff recommends approval of the application with conditions. APPLICANT: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada,represented by Michael Ernemann. LOCATION: 414 N. First Street. See application for a complete legal description of the property. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section 1 exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: HPC has held numerous worksessions and site visits with the project architect in the past year, and have discussed several issues, including the extensive remodeling which transformed the original one story structure into the current building, and the physical condition of the existing building. During these worksessions, the Commission members used a National Park Service worksheet to outline which elements of the existing structure have historical significance or define the character or style of the building. The result of the discussions was a general agreement that the site has significance as a historic landmark less for its architectural character than for its association with people who have significance within the cultural, social. and political history of Aspen (one of the five criteria which the City uses to determine that a site is eligible to be a historic landmark.) While many other historic buildings in Aspen are associated with a person who has made an important contribution to the community, for instance the Wheeler Opera House, Hotel Jerome, and Pioneer Park (also associated with the Paepkes), each of these structures has architectural significance as well and retain the integrity of their original design. Similarly. some other landmark structures in Aspen are associated with important local architects, including Herbert Bayer and Fritz Benedict, but those structures also retain the integrity of the original design. While Herbert Bayer was involved in renovations to 414 N. First Street. it is staff' s opinion that the existing structure is a collection of remodeling efforts which do not successfully represent the original building, the Brown family house, or the work of Herbert Bayer. With this in mind, staffs evaluation of the proposed remodeling of 414 N. First Street which is now presented to HPC views the physical preservation of the building in a more flexible manner, with less focus on preservation of the existing building beyond what is part of the public view from North First Street. At the same time, staff agrees with the architect's approach which allows elements of the new addition to pop up along the street elevation, showing with honesty that the building has evolved into something new rather than treating the street facade as a false front. The applicant has provided as-built floor plans and elevations in addition to a written and graphic description of the proposal. A model will be presented at the meeting. Also discussed within the application is a study of the site and the history of the building prepared by the Ememann Group in 1995. Two copies are available for review by the Commission if desired; one copy in the HPO's office and one copy at Jake Vickery's office. In the attached proposal, the architect has retained the west wall of the existing house and portions of the north facade, retained the existing garage, and proposes to , rebuild the main roof due to structural concerns. A hip roof form which currently extends from the -main ridge towards the alley will be removed (leaving a portion of 2 the existing building as a courtyard open to the sky), and a new addition will be built towards the gardens. For the most part. the existing materials will be retained on the areas of the building which are included in the remodel. The garage will be moved off-site temporarily to allow for the excavation of a basement, and when returned will be placed one foot north and east of its current location so that it no longer encroaches into thd alley. A small addition will be made to the garage which requires a 4 ft. 6 inch setback variance. Staff finds the location of the addition appropriate (it is additional storage for the garage) and finds that the variance has minimal impact on the historic resource or the neighboring properties. As discussed above, staff finds that the approach generally used on historic preservation projects, with the foremost goal being physical preservation of a historic structure, may be viewed with more flexibility on this project. As directed by HPC, the applicant has retained the west portion of the building and the public image of the building as a private estate. By removing sections of roof and allowing some elements of the new addition to be viewed, there is a subtle suggestion that the building makes a transition within the private area of the site. The new construction is modest in materials and detailing, and because of the flat roofs, has a low profile which does not compete with the areas of the existing building which will be retained. The existing house exceeds the allowable floor area for the site, a condition which may be continued, per Section 26.104.030(C)(1), nonconforming structures. This nonconfonnity is due in part to the fact that a large area of the site is required to be excluded from floor area calculation because of steep slopes, and in part due to the sliding scale used for floor area which dramatically reduces the floor area accumulated as lot size increases. Because of the large size of the parcel and the significant screening of the site by trees, staff recommends that the requested floor area bonus be granted. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The surrounding neighborhood has numerous historic structures, and the idea of creating a Hallam Lake Historic District was at one time considered. The great majority of these structures have been remodeled as is proposed for this site. One of the significant qualities of this property within the context of the neighborhood is its heavy vegetation and the notion that it is a private estate. The application has provided a site plan showing existing vegetation and representing that one birch tree will have to be removed as a result of the new construction. The landscape plan fo-r the site, which may or may not result in the replacement of some 3 existing trees if found to be unhealthy. will be reviewed by the HPC and the Parks Department prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicants' have expressed a sincere desire to revitalize the gardens, which are an important part ofthis property. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposal is successful in conveying the essence of the property's historic significance and place in Aspen's history. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The building is an eclectic mix of many periods of remodeling and different architectural references. Staff finds that the existing building is fairly undistinguished in terms of architectural character and is structurally deficient in several ways due to the evolution from a one-story to a two-story building, therefore the proposal is not in conflict with this standard. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020.C, Standards for review of partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: (For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel.) 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance ofthe parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to retain approximately 60% of the existing building mass and to add onto the building in the area of the gardens. This is an appropriate location for new construction and the areas to be demolished have been remodeled to a great extent. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: The applicant has addressed these impacts by retaining the majority of the building that is visible to the public. 4 B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: This issue is discussed in detail under "Standard 1" of the Conceptual review criteria. ON-SITE RELOCATION Section 26.72.020.D, Standards for review of on-site relocation. No approval for on- site relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the ~ standards of section 26.72.020.D.2,3, and 4 have been met. 2. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure. and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation: Response: Currently, the historic carriage house (now the garage) encroaches into city right-06way along the west property line by approximately one foot. The applicant proposes to move the garage off-site temporarily during excavation for a basement, and once returned, place the garage entirely on their own property. Staff finds that the very slight relocation of the building will not negatively impact the integrity of the building or neighborhood. 3. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: This report must be submitted before application for a building permit. 4. A relocation plan shall be submitted. including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department. as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: The bond and relocation plan must be submitted prior to application for a building permit. HPC must set an amount for the bond. $30,000 has been standard for a building of this size. 5 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE #30 The proposal does not comply with several aspects of Ordinance #30 because it is a pre- existing building. The areas of Ordinance #30 which require a variance are: Street oriented entrance: "All single-family homes... must have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window...A street oriented entrance requires that at least one of the following two conditions are met: the front entry door is on the street facade; or a covered entry porch of fifty or more square fee is part of the street facade." Response: The building entry is oriented toward the north, which is its historic condition and a condition which HPC requested be maintained in the remodel. Staff recommends this standard be waived. Garages: "The garage must be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the house, " and "All portions of a garage, carport or storage area parallel to the street shall be recessed behind the front facade a minimum of ten (10) feet." Response: The garage is an existing building and should not be relocated beyond relocation from the right-of-way. Volume: Areas where there are "...facade penetrations between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the level of the finished floor. and circular, semi-circular or non-orthogonal fenestration between nine (9) and fifteen (15) feet above the level of the finished floor" are counted as 2 square feet for every 1 square feet of floor area. Response: Several windows on the existing house violate this standard, however none of these windows violates the intent of the standard, which was to eliminate areas of glazing which span from one story to the next, therefore staff recommends this standard be waived. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) 6 â€¢ Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant conceptual approval, partial demolition approval, o ff-site relocation approval, waiver from the Ordinance #30 standards related to "street oriented entrance, garages, and volume," grant a rear yard setback variance of 4 feet 6 idches for an addition to the garage, and grant a 500 sq.ft. floor area bonus with the following conditions: 1. The garage must be demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation prior to application for building permit. 2. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the garage, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. The bond shall be in the amount of $30,000. 3. A landscape plan, which is currently in development, must be reviewed and approved by HPC prior to submission for a building permit. The applicant shall address privacy concerns of the neighboring properties by making every effort to retain a landscaping screen along the south property line. 4. Prior to final approval. the application shall be referred to the Engineering Department, Parks Department, Water Department, and other referral bodies as needed to identify any issues which may delay issuance of a building permit. 5. For final review, a demolition plan shall be submitted indicating which areas of the existing building will be retained with structural improvements, which areas are to be reconstructed, and which areas of the existing building will be completely removed. 7 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project Name: Lewis/Posada House: Remodel and Additions 2. Project Location: 414 North First Street, Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: Lots A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen, together with the northerly ten feet of the alley in Block 55 as described in Quiet Title Decree as recorded in Book 175, Page 300, Pitkin County Records, adjacent to said Lots A thru I, and the portions of Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9 adjacent to said Lots A thru 1, Block 55, which lie within Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen as shown on the Willits Plat of 1896, recorded in Book 4 at Page 27 of the the Pitkin County Records, and an irregular metes and bounds parcel adjoining the above described lots on their northerly and easterly boundaries, all of the above being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of First Street, said point being S. 14Â° 50' 49" W., 10.00' from the southwest corner of Lot A, Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen; thence S. 75Â° 09' 11" E., 294.08' to a point on the westerly line of that parcel described in Book 256 at Page 877; thence along said westerly and northerly lines of said parcel the following courses and distances: N. 14Â° 50' 49" E., 10.80': N. 33Â° 03' 19" E., 42.21': N. 07Â° 19' 05" E. 112.35'; S. 70Â° 18' 15" E., 209.82' to a point of intersection with a parcel described in Book 341 at Page 373, Book 381 at Page 294, and Book 382 at Page 272 B; thence N. 62Â° 39' 00" W., 161.33'; thence N. 74Â° 18' 00" W., 26.73' (Deed 25.73'); thence N. 82Â° 05' 40" W., 178.19'; thence N. 34Â° 55' 17" W., 130.87' (Deed 130.59'); thence N. 09Â° 26' 25" W., 210.13, thence N. 40Â° 36' 53" W., 5.17', at which point leaving the westerly line of said parcel described in Book 381 at Page 294 and Book 382 at Page 272B; thence S. 55Â° 35' 00" W., 49.81'; thence S. 12Â° 24' 00" E., 242.09'; thence N. 75Â° 09' 11" W., 28.21' to a point on the northerly projection of the west line of Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen; thence S. 14Â° 50' 49" W., along said west line of Block 55 and its northerly projection 184.35' to the point of beginning containing 1.536 acres i all in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 3. Present Zoning: R-6 4. Lot Size: 66,925 s.f. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Jonathan Lewis/Roberto Posada, 414 North First St., Aspen, CO - 970.920.2734 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number: Michael J. Ernemann, The Ememann Group Architects, 720 East Durant Ave. Aspen, CO - 970.925.2266 7. Type of Application: a. Conceptual HPC b. Demo/Partial Demo c. Ordinance 30 LAND USE APPLICATION - ATTACHMENT 1 - p.2 8. a. Description of Existing Uses Single Family Residential with Grage (one structure) b. Approximate Existing Floor Area (measured per Ord. 30,7-304.6). 8,223.6 s.f. c. Existing Number of Bedrooms 8 d. Previous Approvals Granted to the Property: None known other than two previous lot splits undertaken by the Paepcke family in order to convey land to the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies and to the Given Institute. 9. Description of Development Application: The development proposed is a remodel and additions to an existing single family house and existing 2 car garage. The application also includes requests for a 4'-6" rear yard setback variance for an addition to the east side of the garage and for permission for partial demolition and temporary off-site relocation of the garage to facilitate construction activities. C3 9 4 0 etf Nitia kt- 12 , Gotionwood L,144. M,Matn V.w Dr d Bennett B n C B unn V o Yl One 464:~ ASPEN C 0 Salvvion Cir 9. 1 b 0 9 \ a -72 4. C.4 K \24Â°6 2 COLORADO ?2>:> 0 5 -- qi:i,El,-Fo,4 e .a - C D \ AKEV ]2 0 A Gillespie Sty Â£'7~~ 4& v, -*--* Subject Property p '41 : Â« Pl a 2 0 CD n f f - - S/71 ler st ~ e 44 . 4 e ' 3 St 00 + 3. W 2 1 444 t â‚¬ Sawmill 91 0 4 I â‚¬ f c E A. n'tv t. y i j-* 4,9* St q e Â£4-04 r 0 - V J U ar* V L. Gil -1 -St e . 0 3 -5 2 1 s~ ~05 1 - 98 1 #C 1 -4 1 2 - U St 0 Ve 70. 91 Grov i -- r 4 '> A 1 9. 911 1 ft /3 1 1 4 1 1 0 90 42 < 4% 7' 04.,1 Le o ~ 1 9. i R Mint / 1 1 it i 1 1 1 1 0 C f 1 1 1 r 1 82 ! / 1 1 1 f I 1 1 1 0 1/2 MILE 1 1 1 0 1/2 KILOMETER / 1 N VICINITY MAP 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO f 10 D)133 21 --//Ap '\& 1 <10 46 py-liwilit ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada Address: 414 N. First Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Zone District: R6 Lot Size: 66,925 s.f. (36,358 s.f. w/slope reduction) Existing Floor Area: 8,223.6 s.f. Allowable Floor Area: 8,223.6 s.f. (existing) Proposed Floor Area: 8,683.0 s.f. Existing Net Leasable (commercial): N.A. Proposed Net Leasable (commercial): NA Existing % of Site Coverage: 4.7% Proposed % of Site Coverage: 8.2% Allowable % of Site Coverage 20% Existing % of Open Space: N.A. Proposed % of Open Space: N.A. Existing Max. Height: Principal Bldg: 32 ft. Accessory Bldg: N.A. Proposed Max. Height: Principal Bldg: 32 ft. Accessory Bldg: 12 ft. Proposed % of Demolition: 40%1 Existing Number of Bedrooms: 8 Proposed Number of Bedrooms: 5 Existing On-Site Parking Spaces: 5 On-Site Parking Spaces Required: 5 Setbacks (Assumes Front Yard faces Hallam Lake and Rear Yard faces Alley) Existing: Minimum Required: Proposed: Front: 134 ft. Front: 10 ft. Front: 125 ft. Rear: 0 ft. Rear: (Garage) 5 ft. Rear: (Existg. Gar.) 0 ft. Combined Combined Combined Front/Rear: 134 ft. Front/Rear: 30 ft. FronURean 125 ft. Side: 0 ft. Side: 15 ft. Side: (Existg. Gar.) 0 ft. Side: 241 ft. Side: 15 ft. Side: 141 ft. Combined Combined Combined Sides: 241 ft. Sides: 50 ft. Sides: 141 ft. Existing Nonconformities or Encroachments: Bldg Ht. 32 ft (existing) vs 25 ft. (allowable) and Side and Rear Yard Setbacks @ Garage (0 ft. existing). Variations Requested: Rear yard setback (5') to allow addition to existing garage. 500 s.f. HPC Floor Area bonus. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: CONCEPTUAL REVIEW 1. SITE PLAN and SURVEY: See Enclosed. 2. CONCEPTUAL SELECTION of MAJOR BUILDING MATERIALS: See Enclosed Building Elevations. 3. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: The development proposed is the partial restoration, partial demolition and construction of additions to the non-street-facing (north and east) sides of the existing main house and (east) side of the carriage house located at 414 N. First Street, Aspen, Colorado. It is intended that the existing street facing (west) facade of the main house, the entire carriage house and the garden wall along the west property line be retained with only minor modification and/or restoration where required. The existing structu re is a two-story, wood frame, 8 bedroom house with habitable attic, partial basement, and attached two-story carriage house containing a two-car garage and studio apartment. The structure was originally built in 1887 as a one-story bungalow style house with habitable attic and carriage house. The house has undergone extensive renovation and addition on several occasions since the turn of the century including the raising of the roof and the addition of a second story. As such it no longer is representative of the architecture of late 19th Century Aspen. (Please refer to historical analysis booklet entitled "414 N. First, Aspen, Colorado, 5.8.95" prepared by The Ernemann Group Architects for complete description of the subject property.) The history of the structure has not been one of formative preservation, but rather, it has been one of evolution. Innumerable modifications, some minor and several significant, have been the rule over its 110 year life. The current proposal is for development that continues that history of formative evolution; in this instance with interior modifications and additions to accomodate the new owners' needs. Significantly, however, the current proposal also embraces preservation in that it retains the fundamental mass and character of the house, most notably the facade and forms evident to the street. Therefore, the proposed development will have little, if any, effect on the surrounding neighborhood. 4. SCALE DRAWINGS OF ALL ELEVATIONS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND ROOF PLAN: See 24" x 36" prints of proposed structure. 5. VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: See attached "Neighborhood Context Plan" and photographic panoramas of both sides of First Street. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS for HPC REVIEW for PARTIAL DEMOLITION and TEMPORARY RELOCATION 1. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF THE STRUCTURE PROPOSED FOR PARTIAL DEMOLITION and TEMPORARY RELOCATION: The structure proposed for partial demolition is a two-story, wood frame, 8 bedroom house with habitable attic, partial basement, and attached two story carriage house containing a two car garage and studio apartment. It is proposed to temporarily relocate the carriage house in order to facilitate construction access to the east side of , the main house. (Please refer to historical analysis booklet entitled "414 N. First, Aspen, Colorado, 5.8.95" prepared by The Ememann Group Architects for complete description of the subject property.) 2. REPORT FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER REGARDING THE SOUNDNESS OF THE STRUCTURE and ITS SUITABILITY FOR REHABILITATION: See attached letter from Monroe and Newell Engineers, Inc., Re: Paepcke House, 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO, dated June 25,1996. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN and STATEMENT OF THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE OTHER STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY AND THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AROUND THE PROPERTY: The development proposed is the partial restoration, partial demolition and construction of additions to the non-street-facing (north and east) sides of the existing main house and (east) side of the carriage house. It is intended that the existing street facing (west) facade of the house, the entire carriage house and the garden wall along the west property line to be retained with only minor modification and/or restoration where required. The existing roof, however, has been deemed structurally unsound by engineering analysis (see attached Monroe and Newell letter) and will be replaced as necessary. The neighborhood context is one comprised largely of Victorian era houses, some with evident modification and significant additions in recent years and some entirely new houses of consistent residential scale (see photo panoramas of First Street). The proposed development retains the existing form of the west wall of the house and the entire carriage house. Only minimal modification will be evident from the street. Thus the proposed development will have little, if any, effect on the neighborhood around the property. Vall, Cokoracl Denver, Colorado Monroe & NewelI Engineens, Inc. June 25,1996 The Ernemann Group PO Box 4602 Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Mr. Michael Ememann Re: Paepcke House, 414 North 1st Street, Aspen, CO. Gentlemen: As requested, Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. recently conducted an observation ofthe existing house and garage. The purpose of the observation was to fonn our opinion of the current structural condition ofthe building in order to provide our recommendations for the reasonable restoration and/or preservation of the existing structure. The house is a two level building with a full atticanda small basement. The main level contains the living room, libnry, dining room and kitchen areas. The upper level contains bedroom areas. The attic level is currently used for storage with approximately sixty percent of it having the verttal clearance required for habitable space, TIle basement contains laundry and mechanical spaces, We understand the house is approximately 108 years old. The garage is two levels with apartment space on the upper level The house and garage are both eniirely ofwood frame construction with wood and stucco extedors, The portion ofthe main levelofthe residence not above the basement is built over a crawl space. The foundation crawlspace and basement walls are stacked stone. The garage main level and house basement floor are concrete. A review of early pictures of the house indicates it has undergone several structural additions and alterations. At some time one entire level was added to the house and the current attic created. Ai that time, the stnictural system ofthe house was compromised with load increases and load paths different from the original construction. There appears 0048 2. Beaver Creek Blvd. . Suke 301 â€¢ P. O. Box 1597 - Avon, Colorado 81620 â€¢ (303) 949-7768 . FAX (303) 949-4054 to have been two separate single level additions to the south side of the house, one of which is the connection to the garage. The exterior decks have been modified. The bdck chimneys have been added and/or modified. Several interior partition walls ofthe house have been modified. In general, the condition of the house and garage is in line with expectations for well-used buildings oftheir age and construction type. There are floor areas which are out oflevel approximately 2 inches in ten feet. The treads of the stairs to the upper level are not level, There is plaster ceiling cracking in several areas, These conditions can be attributable to building settlement and/or long tenn sagging of the wood floor and ceiling joists. Our observation determined areas o f the buildings which for safety reasons require extensive reconstruction, areas which are structurally inadequate, and areas which should be modified to assure continued structural integrity, Specifically, our fndings are as follows: 1. The existing roofframing is unsafe and requires extensive reconstruction and/or replacement. Existing roofframing is 2x6(nominal) joists at 16 inches on center with some spans ofapproximately 14 foot horizontal. Hip beams are single 2x6. Where roofjoists spans are shorter, the joists are supported on questionable wood stud knee walls, many ofwhich do not aNgn with bearing wall -R below. In our opinion, it would be dimculi to calculate a snow load capacity of20 PSF for the existing wood framing (versus current code requirement of 75 PSF). Evidence ofprevious roof problems include some cracked members and 3/4 diameter tie rods which have been installed on the attic floor to prevent kick-out ofthe north building wall. The slick finish metal roofing, which prevents the roof from holding snow, appears to have prevented total roof failure. In addition, the reconstruction ofthe roofto gable ends on the east and west sides fromthe original four sided hip roofhas changed the loading to the bearing walls and foundations below. Some ofthe building settlement may be the result of this, 2. The existing attic floor framing is 2x8(nominal) at 16 inches. The joists span from exterior walls on the east and west sides to a centerline hallway which runs north-south in the building, The maximum span is approximately 19 feet. In our opinion, these joists are marginal for ceiling framing and are clearly inadequate to support attic or habitable space. They also provide essentially no support for the roof mipporting knee walls above. 3. The upper level framing appears to be 2x10 (nominal) at 16 inches supported on the east and west exterior walls and the haDway walls. The maximum span on the east side of the building is approximately 15'-6 and on the west side is approximately 22'-0. Current code requirements would limit these members to a span of approximately 14 '-0. In our opinion additional support and/or join reinforcement on the west portion ofthe building is necessary. We believe the east side is adequate as is. 4. The main level framing appears to be 2xl 0(nominal) joists at 16 inches. In the areas ofthe crawlspace we could observe, they appear to be supported at intervals appropriate for current code requirements. Beams and columns supporting the joists may require reinforcement, Footings for interior crawlspace columns appear to be large flat stones. These should be replaced with concrete footings. 5, 'The stone foundation wans appear to be 16 to 18 inches thick and in overall sausfactory condifion. Based on good soil bearing conditions the walls appear to be appropriate width for the original construction. A question requiring further consideration is if the exterior crawlspace walls extend below frost depth. Ifnot, they may be contributing to observed sloping floors, etc. 6. The roof construction of the garage was not visible. Assuming member sizing similar to the residence, reinforcing ofthe roof is required. There is a significant bow outward of the south wage wall indicating deflection of the roo f structure. 7. The upper floor ftaming inthe garage is 2x10(nominal) at 16 inches spanning 19'-6. These willrequire reinforcement. The east side exterior porch framing appears to have been reconstructed in 8. the past. This framing may be adequate for residentialloading, but is not adequate for cument snow loading. 9, Addiiionalinvestigation is required to determine the appropriateness ofthe brick chimney support framing. In summary, although it is evident that the structure ofthe house has endured an overload stuation for many years, it is our opinion that certain remedial measures must be implemented to ensure not only safety, but also to extend the viable use of the house into the future. At ammimum, it is our opmion that total reconstruction ofthe roof is required. I.eveling and reinforcement of some floor framing is warranted. Minor foundation upgrades should also be undertaken. Lastly, we believe that strong consideration should be given to reducing the ensting overload conditions by returning the Structure to the design loading conditions present when the house was 0Iiginally constructed in 1888. Thisisto suggest the removal of some or perhaps all of upper level floor areas, walls and gable roof and replacement with aroof and upper level configuration similar to the original. Our conclusions and recommendations above are based on our visual observation without any demolition to expose hidden framing, without mateIials testing and without extensive measurements. Modiflcations to our conclusions and recommendations will surely occur once demolition and construction is initiated. If you have any questions or comments, please call Very truly yours, MONROE & NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. Peter Monroe, P,E. Principal 03/14/97 FRI 11:30 FAI 9709270597 SK Pelghtal Englneers 0001 S KPEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS March 14, 1997 Page 1 of 2 Michael Ernemann The Ernemann Group Architects 720 East Durant Av Aspen, Colorado 81611 fax 925-1904 Re: Remodel 414 First Street Aspen, Colorado Dear Michael, This letter is in follow-up to our 3-6-97 meeting at the above referenced project site- On site with us were Steve Hansen and Jerry Cavalery of Hansen Construction. The following thoughts were discussed: We performed a walk-through of the main house. The roof structure was viewed at the attic, and revealed typical rafter construction with too few internal bearing points. Members are most likely undersizes for todays snow load criteria. A tension system has been installed to reduce a spreading of the opposite walls, most likely signs of past problems. 1 would anticipate complete roof replacement Floor structure was for the most part, unavailable to view. As is typical with these structures, floors were found to be out of plumb and sloped at some areas. The foundation is observed as grouted stone cobble, with evidence of water damage and previous patch work. Floors may also be best replaced as opposed to attempts to reinforce, as is also true for the foundation. The west facade can be maintained in-place, and will entail extensive exterior shoring and bracing systems. The west stone foundation can also be maintained, yet structure loads best transferred to a new foundation system to the interior. I would recommend that a cantilever foundation system be placed at a safe distance from the interior of this wall. That distance will be controlled by soil behavior and depth of the new footing system. This will result in a backfilled crawlspace along the west side, to reinforce the old wall. Of course with any work of this nature, some risk of damage to existing systems must be accepted. 20 Sunset Drive â€¢ Unit #5 â€¢ Basalt, CO â€¢ 81621 â€¢ (970) 927-9510 â€¢ Fax (970) 927-0597 03/14/97 FRI 11:30 FAX 9709270597 SK Pelghtal Englneers 2002 Page 2 of 2 Based on my offices past expeMence, a process is feasible to move turn of the century structures such as this carriage house. This structure is a wood frame, two story, slab on grade building. The main level is a garage, with the upper level used as a study. The actual carriage house roof structure was not available for view, but appears to be a rafter and collar tie system, typical for construction of this era. Final remodel may involve removal and re-construction of the roof structure, to meet current snow load criteria. The process to prepare this structure for moving may involve; removal of the concrete slab, extensive wall to wall to floor bracing, and opening of wall siding low to allow access for moving beams. The extent of internal bracing will depend on the exact construction type and condition found. The building will then be lifted by an experienced house mover, and moved to allow access to construct a foundation system. The house mover will then return the building onto it's new base, and final remodel work can proceed. This process is fairly standard, yet attention to temporary bracing is important. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, r(C Stephen K Peightal, PE President cc Jerry Cavalery - Hansen Construction fax 920-3038 97018 Ll SKP/kkp -i County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECTION 2632.060 (E) L MICHAEL J. ERNEMANN , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the a[tached list, on the 1 Ot Iday of March ,1997 (which is 16 days prior to the public hearing dateof 3.26.91 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from tile nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 14th day of March , 1991. (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Sign*re- \ 9 AL Signed before me this ' day 47ta,itctu./ , 199yby MICHAEL J. ERNEMANN n. 5 U . 'r: . Wn'NESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL. SEAL â‚¬ My commission expires : 4119 l99 .:Â¥ St, 5.,6 - Â·Â·L y JR t#iâ‚¬ Lont (Ad .f:?~ . 4- =U' CLÂ·ff*, Notary Public . >9642,Â»*ki~"-*~ma 8 / JACKIE ~j ~ Not*6 Public' s Signature M C LOTHIAN /d 4y'Â«i'.r <CÂ·t. Â·; 6,2($-2-< ~F.1-%*4(-4Â«. ~'. , I ./,fey . I p - 7111- 1 Â·Â·Â·. 9f~â‚¬ 11,11 .1. r ~-/ ill 44 4 - 1 ,4*PW' 0 40' uu â‚¬\ * - 0--*RU ='.- The L :emann Group *.fr,%.....il/.~ C 11 '.MR Architects , -d-Â¥--.28781,~ . PO Box 4602 01 2*21;Â»3431 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ula .17.L.Irr --/ /19?93*-M:lf{9~~:-2~.~::,+At#. FOR WAI?DiNG OR:,2.1 EXPIRED 60611 Karl Zeisler and Joan C. Zeisler 1 990 Lake Shore Drive M) Apartment 30B Chicago, IL 60611 1 81 4,6,11%66 <1199>9&0 0'2. ~111~1111|~1|~11111|~11~1~1~11~1||It|~11111~1~~~11111~1~~â€žM i rellmil 414 N-.- F:,44 PUBUC NOTICE RE: 414 NORTH FIRST STREET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 26, 1997, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the- Sister- - Cities meeting room, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena.Street, Aspen, Colora#o, w cogsiÂ«[Rn . application submitted by Jonathan Lewis andRoberto-Posada requesting approval forparti,1 demolition ofthe existing house, temporary relocation ofthe garage, and conceptual-approval for a new addition. Applicants are also requesting an FAR bonus of 500 square feet and a rear yard setback variance of 5 feet The rear yard setback variance is requested in order to allow for an addition of approximately 100 square feetto the existing garage. The property is located at 414 North First Street a metes and bounds parcel, a legal description of which is on file at the Community Development Department. For further information contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, (970) 920-5096. s/Jake Vickery. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 8, 1997. City of Aspen Account Â· --Â»â‚¬ =-En' 2=IWI~~I 4,â‚¬- - 1. The Ernemann Group F A X COVER SHEET Architects PO Box 4602 Aspen, Colorado 81611 To C.In uck. Cbrn - <ite.w art 3314Â£ 303.925.2266 FROM 14'U Er nemaÂ¥12Â» DATE *. Fe-b. 91 REMARKS Total number of pages induding this cover sheet <b Please call with any questions at (303) 925-2266. Â«IA,Â£456 -lat # 4112- 0 14 tlepdze Fte-Ferty Areti ook#L~ Hallant Lake - k MN be.103 s jo LEÂ»tah LEWU and; 8obet-* Fbada. \Ale rt ged 10 kne ov- 414 ratrles ah.4 2&&625 ses cj i Al Fropett nole.pr 21+U_ 303 -A 4 4680, p efeft, Ne ~Â»U d l,JewoM 6 regeuck -%\44 and frep:se a lick F Ki *U#1 let Me. 1+07 4 4-4- a. L j T T ' f.:Dr-,3 ole. (AP fÂ» *a NO-KE- Fe,-0 -6 Ped-f#wi~ Â» 14 - f -- - mL.,-in/- -0 ~ h-11 '11 /lub ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project Name: Lewis/Posada House: Remodel and Additions 2. Project Location: 414 North First Street, Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: Lots A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen, together with the northerly ten feet of the alley in Block 55 as described in Quiet Title Decree as recorded in Book 175, Page 300, Pitkin County Records, adjacent to said Lots A thru I, and the portions of Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9 adjacent to said Lots A thru 1, Block 55, which lie within Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen as shown on the Willits Plat of 1896, recorded in Book 4 at Page 27 of the the Pitkin County Records, and an irregular metes and bounds parcel adjoining the above described lots on their northerly and easterly boundaries, all of the above being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of First Street, said point being S. 14Â° 50' 49" W., 10.00' from the southwest corner of Lot A, Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen; thence S. 75Â° 09' 11" E., 294.08' to a point on the westerly line of that parcel described in Book 256 at Page 877; thence along said westerly and northerly lines of said parcel the following courses and distances: N. 14Â° 50' 49" E., 10.80': N. 33Â° 03'19" E., 42.21': N. 07Â° 19' 05" E., 112.35'; S. 70Â° 18' 15" E., 209.82' to a point of intersection with a parcel described in Book 341 at Page 373, Book 381 at Page 294, and Book 382 at Page 272 B; thence N. 62Â° 39' 00" W., 161.33'; thence N. 74Â° 18' 00" W., 26.73' (Deed 25.73'); thence N. 82Â° 05' 40" W., 178.19'; thence N. 34Â° 55' 17" W., 130.87' (Deed 130.59'); thence N. 09Â° 26' 25" W., 210.13'; thence N. 40Â° 36' 53" W., 5.17', at which point leaving the westerly line of said parcel described in Book 381 at Page 294 and Book 382 at Page 272B; thence S. 55Â° 35' 00" W., 49.81'; thence S. 12Â° 24' 00" E., 242.09'; thence N. 75Â° 09' 11" W., 28.21' to a point on the northerly projection of the west line of Block 55, City and Townsite of Aspen; thence S. 14Â° 50' 49" W., along said west line of Block 55 and its northerly projection 184.35' to the point of beginning containing 1.536 acres + all in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 3. Present Zoning: R-6 4. Lot Size: 66,925 s.f. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Jonathan Lewis/Roberto Posada, 414 North First St., Aspen, CO - 970.920.2734 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number: Michael J. Ememann, The Ememann Group Architects, 720 East Durant Ave. Aspen, CO - 970.925.2266 7. Type of Application: a. Conceptual HPC b. Â©emo/Partial Demo HALLAM LAKE HOUSE 4..OVEMENT SURVEY [M--1 PAEPCKE ESTATE ~ I."h -Ill - ASPEN CENTER FOR INVIRONIENTAL STUDIES r---~ ~ \ LEGAL DESCRIFTION c. L 1 2,Â». .4%- , - .9,1.1 - iaEERâ‚¬RM-19-IESE - -. 1 4. <33- mt:_=5.66:-*IMKS... .. ........ 0/ ne /,ur.......-Â»u,- ..#.. Aâ€ž,a I of -1 -- C~"'n ~~Co'a, A- - ~lacu'Â·~ - r.*T,-Al â€¢- â€¢AAâ€¢â€¢Al ***u-n,1 -- ..../..- â€¢AIT~U-i..=-m ....LOV6 1 r-- 21314;01617 , 6 + 9 W.loca.c,r---#0-a n,1,0.-wir 1 *â€¢â€žÂ·.L. I.F.-8 *.- ~- -I-V ./ 0~ .U' .ADÂ·CEL , 1 11I I-% .ae *-M-- #.â€¢ach n~ *Oâ€¢-: COL-O GIVEN INSTITUTE U. ir L. -,r = A k.. 0, I.,I-/cne.â€¢ lili --:Bc: i i W--=-=n~ =-r=,n -I -*-- ".....' l ..,1... , ' "... A.,- 4,&~ B E G ' D : I : I E G 9 " ' 4 -=trA,â€¢ -,Â·,A. 1.-,I 1 1 .B/1 1 11 -- T~ I.I./.i ./. 0, 1./.4ACIL ./.CLIO . '00/ I' 'T ~.C. p../ â€¢00â€¢ - A~ pâ€¢Gl in' n.a I. IÂ· - I..... nilÂ«:i U , I./.....n-Â«11...I'r...........In/ .il 1.2~ ! lili (' qi Â¥51 3 2*- :o- I 1 " 1 â‚¬~.â€ž[,C,E, Mn-ii *-=- n~ Â¥111 1.- 00 â€¢LÂ£,24 - C,TÂ¥ AMD .... 0/ Ap,M, â„¢Uâ‚¬E L ...... I. Al.O-G ..... UNE-â€¢ 4 1 ..â‚¬ 110â€žE ~,0,OVEMEN T SullvtÂ¥ --,4... 1 1 0. .,oca '-m *n-ALâ€¢ &.câ„¢- â€¢â€¢-Â»Â· â€¢0 nâ€¢, â€¢01- 0. .... co...â€¢-c u,. .clo ..11 - r., co-n 0, . -9. I.T.,E M.- liTâ€¢ 0, COU~Atxl - 2--sir*Y,~r'-: ~ 1'1.. 5 1 817. P~*:464- 4- 9 8 5* I il'-1--I--/.Mi-.,-,61-,--2 1 **i.. ' -- . ........, ,â€ž11 ........ -d- 1 la r ALLEY . ..Â·.'â€¢'1' r"t' ... K , 1 GIVEN INSITUTI SURVEYORÂ·; CEATIFICATE '............../.Ic,.....0-rn. 6) -%-.--MÂ¥ -U-*.11~rn~~~U. 1-~0~â„¢1 ~10â€¢~ -ICA-,0 'â€¢~CEU........ T~~W~-Â¥ ~~--1 -*.4 ....O. LOCAn. O/ n. ADOâ€¢1 0~Â»CA-D AU *.0.-Â®al ......In....rnÂ·c.â€¢4........cl o. 1 9 1 FRANCIS STREET \ 1 . *AU.A.11 LAKE HOUIE IMMCiat SUMVCY â€¢ Â· Â· ,*r.... ...,/1 =.A:ZE, z...Â· Ist STREET ~ ' MAR. 10.1997 4:59PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.1 STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 620 EAST HOPKINS AVE. A5PEN, CO 81611 PHONE: (970) 925-3577 FAX: (970) 925-1384 .kÂ· . V TO: 42 Â¢12 0*.fliA1A FAX NO.: 116 -,9 4 FROM: &4 -36(A DATE: 5- \D -11 TIME SENT: RE: |*Wi~ 906313 %*5 L PLEASE CALL IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL ~ PAGES. ISSAGE: (4) HOW DOES YOUR TITLE COMPANY RATE?? DEMOTECH, INC. has been commissioned by FANNIE MAE to establish guidelines and rate Financial Stability for the Title Insurance Industry. 1EMOTECH rates STEWART TITLE as the ONLY Title company in the United States to receive the ghest possible rating three years in a row! ! ! A DOUBLE PRIME (AU CHECK IT OUT! MAR. 10.1997 4:59PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.2 March 10,1997 The Ememann Group Architects 720 East Durant Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attn: Michael Ernernann Dear Mr Ememann: As per your request, enclosed please find the Names and Addresses within 300' of the Lewis/Posada House formerly the Paepcke Residence. 273512300801 Aspen Center for Environmental Studies 100 Puppy Smith St Aspen, CO 81611 273512488005 John J. Nicholson Lou Adler Revocable Trust 9911 W Pico Blvd PHA Los Angeles, CA 90035 273512488004 Lloyd G. & Betty A Schermer Gregory P. & Grant E. Schermer 210 Lake Ave Aspen, CO 81611-1347 273512488002 David T. Schiff th ybOT 485 Madison Ave 20 NewYork, NY 10022 MAR. 10.1997 4:59PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.3 273512488001 Lloyd Cotsen Trustee of the Cotsen 1985 Trust 12100 V\Alshire Blvd Suite 905 Los Angeles, CA 90025 273512407004 Ronald and Jan Greenberg 44 Maryland Plaza St Louis, MO 63108 273512474851 Triangle Park City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 273512417007 Cecil M. and Lorene M. Hernandez P.O. Box 1045 Aspen, CO 81612 273512417008 Maurice N. Nessen 919 3rd Ave New York NY 10022 273512417002 Â· Paul F. Barnhart, Jr 2121 Sage Rd Houston, TX 77056 MAR. 10.1997 4:59PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO. 767 P.4 2735124170C3 Quentin Vidor 234 W. Francis St Aspen, CO 81611 273512417004 Maurice B. Tobin 1850'KSt NW#380 Washingtonl DC 20006 273512417005 Joan F. Tobin 1850 K St NW #380 Washington, DC 20006 273512417006 Thomas E. and Noel Congdon Trustees of the Congdon Qualified Personal Residencial Trust 1776 Lincoln St Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80203 273512418001 Whipple & Brewster Corporation, a Colorado corporation 121 S Galena St Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 27351248002 William & Darlene Manclark Trustees of the Manclark P Q Residence Trust 313 E Bay Front Balboa Island, CA 92662 MAR. 10.1997 5:00PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.5 273512418002 Alderwood Securities Ltd Pacor Secoma Sam 24BD Princess Charlotte MC 98000 Monaco 273512418004 David M. Levy Time Square Blgd 45 Exchange St Rochester NY 14614 273512421001 Paul A Fabry 1127 Bourbon St New Orleans, LA 70116 273512479001 General Efforts Corporation 360 Lake Ave Aspen, CO 81611 273512479002 Rocky Mountain Exchange Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation 1731 15~h St #103 Boulder, CO 80302 MAR. 10.1997 5:00PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.6 273512421003 James V. and Carof H. Redd and Louis N. Scholnik 2400 E. Commercial Blvd Suite 820 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 273512421004 Bonnie K. Sbarbaro 329 Carlile Ave Pueblo, CO 81004 273512419851 Givens Institute Regents of University of Colorado Boulder, CO 2737071851 Jenny Adair Park City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 273707300801 Aspen Center for Environmental Studies 100 Puppy Smith St Aspen, CO 81611 273707303001 Aspen Center for Environmental Studies 100 Puppy Smith St Aspen, CO 81611 MAR.10.1997 5:00PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.7 273707300801 Aspen Center for Environmental Studies 100 Puppy Smith St ~ Aspen, CO 81611 273707304851 Electric Switch Station City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 273707305003 Aspen Center for Environmental Studies 100 Puppy Smith St Aspen, CO 81611 273707313801 Red Brick School City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 212 Lake Avenue Condominiums Unit A: Peter B. Lewis 600 Parkland Ave Mayfield Heightsl OH 44124 Unit B: Peter B. Lewis and Jonathan D. Lewis 4649 Ponce De Leon Blvd Suite 304 Coral Gables, FL 33146 MAR.10.1997 5:00PM STEWART TITLE ASPEN NO.767 P.8 Second and Smuggler Condominiums Unit A Karl Zeister and Joan C. Zeisler 990 Lake Shore Df Apartment 30B, Chicago, IL 60611 Unit B:The Andrew J. Frishman Revocable Trust P.O. Box 465 Aspen, CO 81612 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Cordially Chuck Dom Title Examiner 414 H. F.Â·,a + Lloyd G Schermer 210 Lake Ave Aspen CO 81611 Fax/Phone 970 544 0421 March 18, 1997 Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 8i611 Dear Ms. Amidon, We are neighbors of Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada and live at 210 Lake Avenue. We have been fully briefed by both of them and approve wholeheartedly oftheir plans to remodel their home. We fully support them in this project as we are enthusiastic about updating the neighborhood. A Siqcerel~) c#ELO- Eloy0 G. Schermer H \ 4 N. F: r st PETER B LEWIS , 6 7.. â€¢ d , 18 March 1997 1 1 9 , S Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen Community Development Aspen, CO 81611 #to.4, I write regarding the public hearing on the application submitted by Jonathan Lewis and Robert Posada. Unfortunately, my schedule made it impossible for me to attend in person. I have seen the plans for renovating their property. I am deeply impressed at the creativity and sensibility implicit in developing a way to preserve the facade of this important historic home. I am confident that Jonathan and Robert will make what might be the finest property in all of Aspen even better. It's important that you know that my homes are separated by just two houses from Jonathan and Robert's property and I am thrilled with what they're doing. 4Â«/ b.Â»29 Peter B. Lewis PBL:kas i 11 4 4 *te* BOX 5070 CLEVELAND OHIO 44101 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 414 N. FIRST - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Assistant City Attorney David Hoefer stated that for the record he reviewed the proof ofnotice and it is legally correct and HPC has jurisdiction to proceed. In addition two letters have been entered into the records. NOTE: 414 N. First has eleven exhibits. Chairman Jake Vickery opened the public hearing. Amy stated that the site visit inside the house made it very clear the exact condition o f the building and the changes that have taken place over time. Staff is recommending approval ofthe project including a rear yard setback variance of 4'6" to allow an addition to the historic garage. A 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus. Five other areas need addressed: Landscape plan, relocation plan, and proof that the garage can withstand the physical impacts of relocation. Referral comments are needed from the Parks Department if trees are to be removed and more information is needed about how the structural improvements will be handled. The house has changed from a 1 1/2 story bungalow to a 2 story building. The existing building has very little architectural integrity from the point of view that it does not represent the original building. Windows and different architectural elements of the building don't relate to each other; the building has a confused character. Staff feels the landmark status is related to the people that lived in the building rather than the building itself. The project can be looked at with more flexibility. From the street the house will remain as is. Michael Ernemann, architect for the project stated that they analyzed the history of the house to find out how the house became what it is today and to try and determine the historical value it might have. The house was built in 1887 and completed in 1888 for a man named T.G. Leister who was the first cashier for the Bank of Aspen. He lived in the house until after the appeal of the Sherman silver purchase act which occurred in Nov. 1893. It was then acquired by D.R.C. Brown in 1909. Brown was the founder ofthe first bank in Aspen. Under the Brown ownership the house became a summer house and it had 12 bedrooms at the time the Paepcke's acquired it in 1951. The second story was added and the roofpushed up. There were screened in sleeping porches on the easterly side. The total property was 8 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26.1997 comprised of 21 acres including the land which is now ACES and the Given Institute both of which were given by Mrs. Paepcke. Herbert Bayer and Fritz Benedict, architects made further modifications such as the small porches on the easterly side and a series of changes on the inside. HPC worked closely with the architects in determining what was historic due to the changes. The garage or carriage house has had minimal changes. The house has always had the presence of an estate. The massive west elevation ofthe house represents the public image ofthe house. Another element was to keep the low wall and entry trellis and the Bayer (German detail) of the kitchen. The carriage house and garage will be kept as it exists. The west elevation and primary roof will be kept. Presently all the trees have been kept. Dan Kiley has been retained as the landscape architect. The garage is quite small and they would like to widen it slightly and need a variance. He also stated that he wanted to remove the structure for a short period of time while they place a new foundation under it and move it back within the property lines. Melanie asked if the lap pool and workout space was all inside? Michael stated that it was inside and totally underground and has trees all around it. Flowers and lower vegetation will be placed over the pool. Amy stated that the drawings are the current proposal and the model is slightly different. Michael stated that the street side will be retained but they would prefer the little gable if the HPC approves it. The roofing materials would be a product called astro zinc metal. Susan stated on the model the glass pyramid is still remaining and HPC recommended that it be removed. Michael stated that the glass pyramid will be removed. Michael stated that there are quite a few materials on the house as it exists and they would like to remove the stucco and replace it with wood siding but retain the banding. 9 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 Amy stated Steve Whipple received a notice and asked if a screening wall of trees could be placed on the alley side for privacy. Michael stated that the row of trees will remain and a wall will be constructed to match the existing wall on the west side. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Gilbert stated that the transitions of materials have been handled skillfully. Regarding the gable that faces the street he would prefer to see the shed retained in the interest of historic preservation. Mark agreed with Gilberts comments and his concern is the structural engineers report on handling the temporary relocation o f the garage. Michael stated that the site has not been determined. Susan stated she agrees with the comments that have been made and would prefer that the shed roo f retained. Suzannah stated that she liked the idea that no more openings would occur on the west side. She has mixed feelings on the gable. The gable is more attractive but the shed is more true to the building. Roger supports moving the carriage house to the west and he would like to see documentation on how the trees will be preserved. Mary stated that she is also concerned about the report on the trees. Michael stated that he is working closely with the Parks Department. Amy stated as a condition of final she would like a report from the Parks Department. Jake stated that the research done was commendable and the project itself was well presented to the Board. Chairman Jake.Vickery closed the public hearing. 10 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 MOTION: Mark moved that HPC grant conceptual approval, partial demolition approval, ojf-site relocation approval, waiver from Ord. #30 " 3, standards related to street oriented entrance, garages and volume, grant a rear yard setback variance of 4 feet 6 inches for all addition to the garage and grant a 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus with the following conditions: 1. The garage must be demonstrated to be capable ofwithstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-sitting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation prior to application for a building permit. 2. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (ifrequired) of the garage, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; The bond shall be in the amount of $30,000. 3. A landscape plan, which is currently in development, must be reviewed and approved by HPC prior to submission for a building permit. The applicant shall address privacy concerns of the neighboring properties by making every effort to retain a landscaping screen along the south property line. 4. Prior to final approval, the application shall be referred to the Engineering Department, Parks Department, Water Department, and other referral bodies as needed to identify any issues which may delay issuance of a building permit. 5. For final review, a demolition plan shall be submitted indicating which areas of the existing building will be retained with structural improvements, which areas are to be reconstructed, and which areas of the existing building will be completely removed. 6. In addition that the hipped shed roofon the westfacade be maintained; second by Melanie. Discussion of motion. Roger stated that he would recommend that #6 condition be removed as HPC is designing. 11 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR.16,-1997 Amended motion. Mark rescinded #6, second by Melanie. All in favor, motion and amended motion. Motion carried 7-0. Michael asked about removing the stucco. Roger stated that materials and removal of materials should be dealt with at final. 17 QUEEN STREET - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Jake stepped down. MOTION: Roger opened the public hearing and continued the public hearing on 17 Queen Street and Conceptual review to a date certain April 9, 1997; second by Susan. All infavor, motion carried. MOTION: Roger moved to adjourn; second by Susan. All infavor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 12 i - ime<6 lan 'll ' 1. 1 .1 1 : 11 1 Ii! f r-71 Reaang 'C-~ i El = .\ Mstr Bearrn ~1 0- 11 4 I.-1-- -- ---=1 le ' U U a W 'Fne 1 r ./ ,-1 iT-x Mstr dedrm I ' 1 1 J *. --- i 1/.-0 L 1 . Lf .~ 1 11 2 ' Bearm 1 . L It== L-. - - r- ant 2 7 - 162' 9- 1-+9 I _ . v _-0- Kitchen_ ---Wl *'ll./i:/- bM Be*rn -L I -- 80 1 ft.-71 Bedrrn . 1 ---1 1 / I /1 1 1 / 1.1 , \ .\ ..2 ' dn 1 ~ Mud sit~4** 1 1 -0 1 , ' 91 1 11- .1 ' 1 ; 1 1 Fe- 1 1 2-1 Garage ~ 1 2- Entry Level Floor Plan Second Level Floor Plan rUUL...1 ~1 0 5 23 Existing Floor Plans 'UUU,"Â¥WWWÂ¥Â¥41hl"WIWIWIWWÂ¥Â¥Â¥Â¥'mull' Â¥4 ~â‚¬.3%2~-. - . j~yarÂ¢*~ 3 E ~RE~*04*468%~~i S . n /-7Â«2 1 mn- Int '1 1. ' El i. 1 U El El E. 8.- - -a p k.-1.1:141 ..1 l - 1 1"'26. 6====;t--6.~b Zir-1 -1-1~ r , 1 1 21~ r 11 - 1 1 1 1~1 26 1////tra 1 11 t 0 '~M kervigil North East r, !Iii P -0 1 2 1/1 1. === 1 1 " H M 1 killl'W H -1 IM H -1 4 - r I 1 --ME 1 4 0-7-- E,g -1- 8 B Blibu WRIAF' I 11 =1 -11 1 1 r--1 *15 1/0-0--4 1,9-, 4 4 South West Existing Building Elevations Amel i 0 5 0 â€¢ U U w V U W W W U--I U W u u w w w w www Â» -4--2/ \1 \ . . i \U di A W. L. 7825.2 O -- - w. 830 - 0 ly \0 AIL -1.A - 0 9:19 C ) . -i:F~ A.- 1115 #Aff.FEN'i':I. 5 W. L. 4' < \ 1 "WL.7826.4 3 i 7822 7 ~ ~ 34* #4.4-9.1. 7 X 1.492ereDÂ».., r.ul/Fqf, t 1 2 2 . ' aliB- -- -- - I ' - ...,. 2 0 + \ .4 4. 040 4/ 90 4\ . x7837.1 .) 9-9 7841.7 x 1 -11 e , 45 -3840______i_~c\00 .t,~1 O TRIANGLE PARK . >C 0, - x 7877.9 f V 1 10 - ).)*-IP#51 / I 78 73.4 6 -- - 7879.3, -1 \\ . 0 j- 7880 t 1 X ;7883.7,--- \\ Gh /L_-3 - ~13 1 i L, 1 *7 - - 2 x 7879.6 - 2, .\ x r 5 (tj.L. 7 0 0 -x . 144 L- 1 44 9 D _ 7 1-13*1 4 / x 7881.2 k T*T 1 i 12! N f-/9//9 4-j .. L 7882.9x --1 -- R --- \ \ :6:4 6 - E ~. Y - l . ' X 1 0 - t ~7879112 3 -pÂ«~~ 1 \-4 .lit 614 --- . ' -$-1 44 * r /1.7 L Â»1 1 0 /4 ju-:.:-f ---17? \T , \ 1 x 7881.2 3%1>< r-47 3-1 '' X.A-.9--4= . Sh| t - C J .... 1 1 ./ _1.- : - - 1- 1 1 / E-- - fi--1- ---- -- -- -- :t ~1 k- i E *I- .31 -1 x or) ~ Existing Building -~ , L.P- U 71 ' 7 i ,) GIVEN INST. 1 ~ Proposed Bui Iding IL__Jz-~ h ~ 1 Entry / 1 L~jj g- EANCIS ST. x 7881.5 329*-' \ ighborhood Bloctâ‚¬Plan / L---.-V-~ ~ Parking Â»44 -11 - - 1,/- M -1 r ' Â· Â·-2-1.Aâ€¢* r... L.Â· d J .1 c 5.- 1 1 1 r h 2% C j \ 1 \i jfC; 4 L â€¢'44â€ž~AL,â€¢ CLL -â€¢AÂ»G, #5 REBAR . I NO CAP, 7 I I 2 . NAIL W/ CAP FOUND ~ - 1\\- LS. /20151\ FOUND 975'09'11"E \1 ~, 0 N ~ ~ ~ - - 0 4935Â£N . ' 1 ~ 28.21' ' / '4 WROUGHT IRON-/ ......- --- . mp,--- v'a @*~ 14-0 Â£ :Â·ERREE# - . ~ ~ - A I ... 1%Â·-fel-UL_-- -Â·Â·Â·4~~-- --/ FENCE 0 ~ p .CAGRiEN FX(' Etâ‚¬PjF?EAA A \~ ' ~ 1 \4%\. \ . V- - \ \ . 'â‚¬27Â·r- I. 1 + , ....... \ \ I..- p. D/V/#FjiNJ-k.... 10.SA=20.- . 4 \ .-% - .. 4 V//A 94>QÂ¥~L'.21.1..:- - I *. v~A -vs...4.- r-- . \ -- i -- -- n 1.--*--il 1al-*f----1-~F~ .;Ill ......... -- 1 \P -.-- - - - ... \I ~Â«- 9---Ili~ -- /,i\Â·2 . - ---- . 29 1 EVERGREAV 4 -- . - .- \\ ------- 3,9. \ .\ \ \ \ -- --- Â· --- lic ..1 34-0 EVERGREEN --- 0 =C= <i =~1-- 'Ii'.2 EVEIEJE--' - - - -- ; I. - % - - ER ST. ~I . 4 & lm; -4 -18-*15 0 PINE j 970 ---- . 6 L./L EX> .5. - 0-T x< c. - ... ...1 n \ --/ P \\ N. - 1-X ... . & . i . s -i -----3 h i \ \ - - . - - --0- - - \ ..\. 1 '. ko, /,~--/ ..\ - ~DENERUNE <----- ------ -Of.ExgT.p-__--- : .... 1 \ ! 1 4-1 Â·7 -- -- e - - I -- 4- -- C -- - ---- - TO A ... I ---- f-- -- -1 --- - -- - 24"â€¢ EVERGREEA -g~ Â· - --- 9 - U . - - .---4/--- - 1 ... /t .... - . - -- :ae ' 3/ F (36 0 E' \' fli -1-/ V h )----0 - - -- - --- BEA . , ;7 ~ i V h\-f -- -- - -- ~ ,/ 3 - - ---- ---- -7 - j Â«j . 96 , 1 --.75 r / PX ---- - / 4 -- -. - - 103101 *-- -Â·4~ -- f, 1 LANAP , - - , i -* Â· .-- / 7- ./ *. C /53Â£ 0-0' 4,/R6#EIN Â· 1001-45 R i , --r - / - ---- 1 ' *--- -M 1. --- -- -- 1 / ... k1J v .9- -- - \ -- - r oss-~ MAILBOX- \, Â· rl - --- h..... / 94 x.-- -i - ..... h - 1 -21 1 r )73 i .'/ , - . 1 -\ 1 - - ER ATION / Â£-- --- a./, . --.g- . 1 - 1/ 48 ~0 EVJ?GR~N \ eli. j 1 . . - .- --- - -~-en 1 /. i \. 1 RAILROAD Tll,/ 31 \ .. 4 \44 - 29 ' 1 - ' QUU 1001 /\ m.- -- __ _ _DECK . 463>- 4 .~ r 0 - I ......._ - ---- -- - -- ... 4< CURBING v < U. 1 : el - 2 -_ 64 ... ---â€ž ---- , 1 '. I ----- - ---, 140 El/E,4 -REEN \.....> \-4 -. / h 9.5-0 ! / C . v Â£---- 1,6 -4 %--- r' 2-_ GROUP OF THREE I.- . I , 1 BIRCH TREES r ; ~Â·Â·08 -0 DECOUOUS --- - 280 EVERGR . t / ~74 ~~ ; 1 \ \ -412 MooD ,,1 ~1002.12 + & - I ,% ' 214 I -- Al 1.-/ 6/ .. ~ frit . I - ... / i t' 1 -4.21 D.,12 i - ~ .: ~ 1002.17 /, ----- -- j " L.4 h cip Â»OOD 14'â€¢ EVERGREEN t.-=' 4-0 DEaDUOUS 4 ...h - 1002' ~ 1; 1 / LGATE / A. 1.- ./--\\. 1 - 4 4 N. 21St STREET r ' . 10#0 AgeÂ£4 (66.925\SF.* 1 / y -1 \ Wn. C 7 1.536 Aqf - ~ 12'0 EVERGREEN 1 , 284 0Eab. .4 \ 4.%4& . 4 L Â£31~ 1 <0 -l .IN ' * a %5 Â¢ 1 1 , 1 1\ 1 t 2 / i t- FLA 22' BRICK 1.... f #- -- - / I 1 1 , ,-4 1 , WALL / r , ; 0/ 1,1 ! 1 . 101 PINE f i ,/4 56>, Vife- :UNK 1 - \\ \1 -14 I ! . , 4.2-0 EVERGREEN ~.1. 2 * 8.5-0 C 48'0kVERGfEENE 7,~,( SC~~3'y.5 BASE ~~ --- Ir) U.IRRA 4 *. 15'0 EVERGREEN . ... .,1 / j {*l~~ 79.; ~>~g-0 A~ \--1? 41& C <Â·3 1 / 1 4. 8 - . ..4 '-v; 1 -ir g -0 2 % 7-0 7 4 8 0 LA....W .\ / i 9.. EPERGRFD~(-,--, _ 1 . 22/- j *Wt> I , 24*0 EkERCREEN . I .. . . DOG ; '.41*emp#. .*- imid . -ptuou l .... 1 18. & 24.4 DEGICLJ GE *EVE- 8. 0 . 11 . 1 1 4. A ; C<ix-nk_, -- 0- ~ 11__1 4 .1 - SH/gaS - - .0 2- CATY PED:/97-0 kYERGREEN -J N78;09'1 rw FY-16: EVERCREEwT C -U -U J 294.00' \ ~5-0 EVERal* UGREE,/ ~-,-Aw-~~~W~<- ~-*.9.12-0 clv--BLG~ ) ~-4 0 EVERGREEN ~ 19-0 EVERGREEN -f \.PICKET LUMuk--- 1 1 -- ENCLOSURE , FENCE . -- J a*OaD ACW D- 7= ~- NORTH 1 St. TREET, Sto. Sto. Ext. Wd. Sh. ; Mtl. 2 0 - -- F Mtl. Mtl. Sto. , Mt! Ext. Sto. 39 Ext Sto. ~ : -Ext Sto - 1 -- 1 1 p A,â‚¬ 1 , 11 - 1..1 1 1 LigÂ·- i. i -_ -- -- --- <i:-,- 1~~Ext Wd. Sh. ---- - Ext. Wd.- ~,~ LExt. Wd. 1 Â· ----Ext.Wd.93.FiÂ» - . - -_.__ Ill 11- -- I -Ii-I.--12==21 EE ---. -*+-4; _Ext. Wd - ----- -- --- --- Ext Wd. . -r- F=i- 11 .....91 ' 12 24 - '14 )44 - 14 -r Â· -7 --3.4 -- - - 4. ./ , 1 2-i#:49 --- - Â·-e.,F -- .---4 KE=66=&4 Cl .*.1 * i.3. 6.-49-rq -- *- 1 Ext. Sto. 1 Ext. Sto. Ext Sto. 4/56/ : Ext. Sto. Existing Stucco A-5 Sto. Stucco Ext. Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding 6 Ext. Wd. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles Mtl. Metal WEST ELEVATION Stn. Cut Stone Panels 1/8"=1'-0"- I . .- 9=77---3 . r 1 Sto. Mtl. ,..44 Mtl. -- . P. I Sto. 4-5 - ! Sto. i - Ext Sto. Ext Sto. -294-~ 0 i Â£ 2,/1.71%. Mtl. --- 1 . 0- ~ 1 2- 7 +-4.... 4 1 - 1 - ./ Sto. Stn. Stn. i ' -- -59* W 4.-St:yal Ext Sto. Existing Stucco Sto. Stucco Ext Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding Ext Wd. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles Mtl. Metal NORTH ELEVATION Stn. Cut Stone Panels 1/8"=1'-0" ~ 9 r. l = , t I i 1 Sto. 1 Sto. I Mtl. 1 A , 1 Mtl. Mtl. . Ext. Wd. Sh. 9 . Mil. . r, Sto. l' 1 - -- -----------------P, \144. . - - #- 1 1 *r. Â·DeCHM-#'* -I--4---'-bl---I":fTIFT -1?~ Il Mtk _ ~~~------*- -2.. Â¥ AL E 11- .11 if~ ~~.3 - -11.- .A.------- ' Mtl A , IN 2 Stn. -1 1 i .--t - 'gu~ 0 9 1 r , 23.-1:2-20. 2- â€¢ ~' - trÂ» - '**lip*in Ig --r ' -z. - I I Ext Sto. Existing Stucco Sto- Stucco Ext. Wd. Existing Beveled Wood Siding Ext. Wd. Sh. Existing Wood Shingles Mtl Metal EAST ELEVA Stn. Cut Stone Panels 2-Â·,4~1217â‚¬64*14>tia'**M"r<imIlimiMVJZ/71=&0=1-.- o. **ry.'Â«~ Â·. r.. c 1 . 4+N:.â€ž81 w *. , 440,%,V *#: ~~.34'<Â· 64Â·'2 :f t'6Â·LÂ·.Â· P ~j Â·, j-Â·~i.... ,~tiÂ¢.i~Â¢,jz diÂ·y~g P <tltij?Ig~. ~ i m El m mwT - ~ 03:.li W i . 1*4?1 r al . g L SE - a a o 0 Al 7 -7-H ''Â· I, 4,/ . ' 4. m m T... X X 1. 0 Â· - - (0 0 ... 2, C 0 0 0 0 14..4 - / 11 r 3- 1 .911 1 - ..11 0 Â· t. - -7-- 1 i 10 at 02 i Â·51&11 44: .:ivÂ·1455'.,6.' 4 - ~-1:t 1 W. i --1 1////* Â£&41 N.0 .?22Â·:, U/ * ,#/15,/cqlf.. rr----~-7,71 11 1.-1 - to 1 W K U) - 1 0 O L-- 11-willa 0 1. lpÂ· 0 Metal sleued eums tno POOAA peleAes Bu!19'XEl Mtl 1313 HIAOS . , 4 .1 14 â€¢* ~ , , ~'t-f,9~ 'i:*irv ~44, # .1 00 :'-. . . + Â¢11 :C ' 9 :' 6 ' 1 J - '31 - ., *'' Â·'I' '' A)'' 5/5/'' J.â€žI .0Â¢~~, ' fÂ· r' i:. 0' 4 1, /'; 2 4''f~'{ -' I :':-.-'- ..,!~~ 7 4, 1 .r".7 '41.~1=-9-E .a,1.,DÂ¥ .4 2ftÂ·. . 4 0: 1 1 ' ' 1. r .lr' 4 9 r B I ' rAT i 14 1/0 7... 1 ,f' ~ P. . di . , 4 t LU .. Ui - 4, . , .4 : 14-â€¢ Ar"~ %44674*96' r , 1 .4.51..,3:,1 zkf~54-4,Â·C,~ 441 - . 124''jih;:2 PA..f4-1 , . Amil,Zi.FRA.52'WRM,49,11: 0 :,r 1. Â¥ . ', i 'N >C><40'' '~eâ€¢ ~ .: Â£ 24, f~>'jaiy,,1 -: di. 1Â·1,9.'. 91 4, ./-*.73*7,4:ful'*~ J 6. f ..r I r.,L-Â§'42%;,2#414'.4~ #dif,~~;~~ :* ~~ W 14054Â¥ 1145 :64' RMW13//b/- ,/,R/NL- . #*' a ' . 1, * HU X ii; Â·:, 4 *, 1, Â·Â·liff~.~4~~~~''t,2-01(~~9-<~*#'',9ko; , f Jib~ .ff '* t. ' ' , d . I -/-+ '... . .t 4/ Er. I. 1,> , . 4 * .2-',;1 1 LD#&/Bugw<%0704;{dk',4.A i :'*t ,Â· 4~j:155'i %1 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ , . A j ' E-}k -I. , 5# Â· , 4644,.* 2 A' 4 -- 11,- v, '20;&~1~ , 42' . 31. 'Ity, r' f ,Â£19 1 I Â·,6 7 1: I. f . 0 9. . 0.- 0 . C - t.tdollf:1,Â¢'*&.PAA.:91Â¢V,44 . If '94 ./ , 4 670#y .,. 'i''I , %#-M . ...0 - 17' ~ - 25.Ittift,Â·56,1.-7., 2 - * .b . , 70 i 4/ 4 â€¢1 '14- 19 - 4 ~itâ‚¬ *tifiFu'~ aki A'48~~ 3 / 12 NeÂ¢6 - -- ',0- ~.~.3'24'5'.34. **19#AM*&#tigfg#4 ,;$ ' Â· 9- . w . .. 11 . 1 r A . 1 'B f,; B J~'k r l. , . 9': r , , A.t . 1 , t:*1. --. i . 1 ' ' 0 ' t"j. 1,-, (4>UF~4 **f/499. r ''r,â€¢glry H j,Â·k,I'' : U. 1 '.. ., : 0.- - "1 4, 4 11 1 ly : , I Â£1, , .*:lei . i i . . :}Â· S tes<.Â¥Â·~rid'.P . I , Re'l<Â· 1-46â€¢4â€¢' p ' ,2 'f:' .-373 ' :f~* A , IÂ·ic :1; :75.R' Â· 6 ... I A , " . , = r-- A . , 7. El, (1, 1 . / KÂ·.i i~} ' 2~9* , I Â· f i**ZA & 0 Â· , , . ' C'A #6Â· * ~fet. 44 4~2* *I'.4% . 1 ''.1 , .1 ... , 1- 4 -rE '15*f .f" , 4.. '.~ 1 : 4'i .ittlk , '2 7 ..... . :er . 4: * Fl,# f . ,.lf I I 41 .... ' AighÂ©BEL#9 -cip, ' t % .9...1 ' Ir, 44*{ 48, 61&9'i ,1 . 1 . 12 4 4 i, : Â· Ati. Â·P, 1'~t~Â·~1Â£0 2 ~ 0,%4 '. 1/ 1 0 - 1 % . . 4*11>li~. * .,4 14'ttl , 2 ' I ... r . .,.l . .47.0 ,< N . 1 P, .F. i , 9 r u e 1.. ' . i 1 '94 1 , 11 4 , 1 .1 Â¢ 1 . .4 .4. , 4, . ''Â¢ 4 I r I i ....2 % ' + 310 4.0 Â· Jrflve; i.(,iâ€¢â€¢1!f fliy ; " ~ ~'' 1 0 -* '15 , 6 . -1 b b J'.0; . 'Mle,?,1 / 1 96'0':MA,99&0Â¢fâ‚¬Â®4Â£. lk,%41&â€¢;r.Â· 5 . - ' me 7 f " 4 f / I # 9 1, , . 4 , p'44*40Â· ~Â·el';(Â¢94- *2 -544/.31.4.. if , 1 'r':Â·-/ 4 . 4 - .A; .,4 ; , 1 ' , . 4 1 , I ' 1 '. 14....944. 1Â«0{~.~E.34:3#6 ,Â·62::.flt'k.~.A~f,qkwee;d '1 . D , 1, - I 0 4 .. . -1 .0 /1 5. , 1-4 ..,0 .' 9-11% 2 1. I. - *Â«NI*t fiÂ· :twths#Agg~Wkwa#*87<.'' - [V -1 - 1 , 1 11 , 44 ,r Â· ''f*.fÂ·,4-4'/ C ;#" r 4 :.1.49'..u-r:t,KOft'42.2 (- .,:li,~,,)Â·t:-t<*822- 2 F., ,rritfil,05 94:,i.:wrtbrfx . 4. '' r , I 1 , 4. + a3 04 1 D 1 , 4.1 0 1. C I J - . }:.4 . Â· *' tr?tÂ·~4 f:r. Ulf,f 1.2 4 ' ' ' f.0, 4 N' 1~;~ 1- '4-- 1 - '1,1 : 56 4:t . & * -1 4 - 4 4 4,4..'44.11 ' .:'. 16, 4.1*: 4 , Â·4~ ,4, 1:, ' . 2 1 :50 <,4,#4&1 ~51~. .4,1,1 -rz-7 2 , 'fl . .44 1 â€¢ r 1'. ' 1 . . -1*- *t' .4. e Â£Â¥'1494.9 51,6.~; f Ti , Â· 4 ..'Â»,Â· p f..'" .Â· Â· 4,4 0., :, , .11 . -- Â¢ .- ~u- 1. + KIa l' . 4-Il. ar#74 ; ... 4, Â·.,Â· ,Â·tr..t e.,4â‚¬- .r 'Â·pyÂ·Â·.80.-::Â·#.1~ , .:42 .t , ... I - v*X b e , 1 , 1 Ill 1.- . Â·1/2 0 I Y 0, m=- 4 t *45-.-Nt 2 lilli 1 1 . + 9 2 0 . 2%6 1 , _A.. . IF ' VIÂ»*.Â»*~Â» ' .4 1 .,.. *94:*13:4 $ I . . 9 -- 0 t.'f 1,4 3. 9 14*10 , .21 -1 . . - . .1 7. 1 ~ Â· , . 1 1 , 1* 4.1,16'. & 2 6.~i V . 1 46 ' Y/1 . . 4,1**,2,,4. . 0 *-7 1 , 't' .,- '* 4. . 4 & f 1%4$ ,#<21 :*.I <fr , , ,â€ž7: , p: gr v .. , 4.... .4 'h '4 . 1 414.1.9.94 .1 11 9 1 J.941 -:.31 ~~ 1 % 7,4... 4.,94 ./ 87 - ' 1,2:4, , '' ~' ~ , ' I * I-'ll I ''-I Â· 1 :6 I 4 'i ...3 .''. *' . 1%2421 *4*'1 Â·43'7'~Ti'" Â·itft,], 4 1 -1 .'t.32:69:9'* 4-L 4 r- f lit f 4 , 7Â· .1 e " - 1 1 tr Likf,.Â· I ./ + t. 1 f ' i , 1111 . Â·.' 1 1. b l: t , .1 Â¥ , ' ' IR,1,8 0, i ' CL''i ''111 1 .,jtÂ¥ |t t! ' &1(.. 1 (11 ~ 9,11. , lilli~ C+ty' ,. 11t}.,~, 11 1 -/' 4 4 - 2 I liE ' 1 Â· 1:,4 111 $ 11 4/ 4. - I 6. - . 212 + . 9 0.Â· . PE 1 $ Â· ~, ,&24**64 ifil'M~FF#<.0 - - V 23 1 0 49:#Redj&&e .." , , r Â· ' t; f w *t' 4-57:~, 1 1 -" t. r 1,1 Â¥ 1 34,4 gil 1,1 I 1 1, , elt Ast ' ... 1, e.. ' N t 4. 1 1 â€¢-Â·s.:rj ' 't, 4 , 4 1 7444 :1-Â· 1... :,3,/ 04 Â·Â· W. ,p.'. ' I , 74.1 .,-1, 4 . . I ., y '4,1./. *4 ' . Â¢ 9/9 m #~ - -- I.--- - '9*4*,%4Â©' 0:/Â£6184*1 ... ./AN i * W *>.t.Â¢,1>47:~,2;41,1 ; 1.-4~ ~t~J~~~L'~ Â£,~~0~- 1'~'.*>-t Â·~ML.. 'tf,311.44~,~ f 1,: r, , '' *4,, .4: . '. ' -2 -" L i, .i C:...' 1 L , . . 1 1 ..3.relÂ¢ I. 4.- I. 4 . , l r i , 1 1 1, WZIÂ¢i, . 0 , ' , 4 -9 &. ': '' k'.M'.::'* '. . 1. 4 6 94, i 4 '1 /1 Â·- : 1 ..40..7-Â·re,i<,v, 1 ' .4 . ' I - . 1 / I '.1 1 1, r, 1 1 1 , , 1 Il . "--sf - r 4,1 , - ::lf ' " r â‚¬2VYM#Ylill~ef,* 7 ' ~, .' .2 X + * :t - h *. 1.-~9.2. , . ~'=19~.M*&**/*q'IA.' .-i ~ I ./ M.* 9 0. ,Â·1' . .9,- ~ ~ Â· 92?1 0 -1.Â·- -:6 8Â·~*.3:ic ; . . . /4- ....:''. - './. I. + I 2,9 â€¢# , ta l*'.- 45 - ~ - 't- 'A-- b.2),~:14 its e " 1 . - - 4 . r ... d A . ha= I. .. 'I ' -2" 5-- + 0- S 4. 4- 2 .4 ../ '1' - .2 2-=ru=-1- - J . . . -n...i-.....i...lili.A i.--.9 41-,t: 4Â·.isy*fiX' I-#, . -; 9 JE..1, #3 .Â· . . - ' 1 '. %â€¢L *:~ 0,~, #mi~=I-//2.-1-Il"J...p Â· 1,=ru,CU 1.~1 . . Of-mol" ~ ~ Ser. I V.# ./ . - 'll 4 9.- *:VB- 4 .. .. ~. , - ..4 Mip Zil.,6~&/1/*. .. . 199 -7, r 4 :.: 1 Â· , Â·..4-~ 42 . 4- . N 1 Mil v ottice-~ - &7~Â· C ,'t * *~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ -51~ = I 40 -1 Â¥4 1 44-*Pr .:1-. .-p -,-...~t: :*..#-21.: 2! 1 ...,-420. â‚¬. 41.. - I - . . i<.2.' - 3Â¥24 p L â€¢ 0-74.74 --5. . Yit- f~ ~2â€ž *Ce.. --I Â·Â· .tâ€¢fak~ 77 Â» -.la/%.IL 1.-. ':'>*al#* itt ' gt?: 1. EfS- . r Â· I Â· - U., -k I ' 12>.4 + L;* , ~ 2 .fr ' iM,# .â€¢.3 - 04'Egr f-34*....9,4-#Cli. : Cf# 2 - i. 2 - ' . . I . :- ~ ,.i . --. Â·--j :i, 40 - ~- < p .11.. ' . . 4 . - E. 1- $- *e . I . : â‚¬/= ..u... 1 . A =rk -1*%22 0/5*. :'04 4 %139:y )14 4..-1.-SJ -AALâ€¢= 2 / . b di ' - ..._ _ A -r-~ ag.*. .* ..~1 r . - 74 - '-4,;*4~ . f.- .f - I : 027 . 4. . 4 ,"> i:ShU:1,1 :~ 444 * â€¢ w I #*,32Â§/& I - 2 : , 4 934 ....... ... -4. 4 *2 - 444*I?#2414:'454. U : - 0- i.: 5 2 % Â·: Ial I : ~ ~ ~,6.â€¢ 94 - 6 - -26* ..1.*FIC' -2, *r -,5 -:.1-4.v 1 Â· , 9 4. ..,â‚¬.2=2: .4* .7. . I . . 24,1 . =...1,96* Â£ A. 4/4.Wn/4/-:Ske. - -'. .~ ~ 22 2 :: 02*ty.0-Â·p:â‚¬44*..0 4 . 5 ~ %22. 1~*~WE+J -117~ ; 7.'42Â· it ' -- *.e . -1#- , .' 2 '.UX~</~ 19 - -/Â£4/4 . , , t -0/.#,T;/fJ~9 -r . 1 Â·~ . ' * e ' 1 - .. . ... ./ - t _--/21 6-I, - - -1. 44:rt : ,-*8*1*aÂ¥fPJÂ¥9~ 4,9.. - 0 .2 - . 0 .. <pe , . 41. 1, 4 . T " % - 8 12 1 1, : i: i 4.2: *.-, % r/7â‚¬ NmEA : i J : - . â€¢ Â¢ 4 .*11' 9.41 ..9 * . r f t. ~ 58-{r:Â¥Â· _ Â· 1 J,-%0 -a : ../#:.. I. I. *UU*w hito:ir '4 li --%-2 :. 1 - 4/I /1.' 4, , t . 4,5,1 p/ - , VJ ..2 .r. . -.... . :9 - 2- . . - I Ss * Â· - i. J -91 :. 20-4--t# f ' Al: ; s. - V- P. 3 1- :..29,7- * I: ::,0 4 . I 74.46. 1 * 1 1 -Â·e=:x / R 1.4.1 - - -r.r, -4,/ , >['. 42 . ~ , 1 1 -' 'f Â·Â· Â·' ~ 9 Â· X#~V 6... 325.â€¢T ' - ; f*L h -i )Mt~: --NtÂ» F v.-Â· ~ ~1 1- * i @b . . - pit: 4>' -1 - ..., 1 : 1 ' 2' 1 f 1* S. Â·. - S .. 4 * 0.1.-20,53.2: I. ... If . .1-+ :* 4, 1. h -Alt c. 42 - $1:0... ' 44: â€¢1 Y-1 - 11 41"gibit 4.....2 -: . 44 ?â‚¬:t e. 8 3 ;66 0 --09 2 4. M I *Li'; 17 2 t 291 (- f ;2. Fijar/;29.91/ij/;iffiv tia'~ _ I ' '*. i 4 E. > % 1 - _- - ..1 -* Dining P "-4 1, , t' a-Â·r' " Â·2- :<*A k :: 1 - Â· %23â€¢ * AA ... , s. Sitting 2 1 8?*hW~*F 0 .. 1 I - -* 1 :I, 91 43;*311,21 11<Tri& -- ' , .; I , , --4 1 - \ - -- - 3 .7 . .1 - ..4 2 I "4 11 _ . . . , ./ & ..P .i J 4 0 : '1,4 I I e 1 1 .. 4 , 44 4 e. 2. "liD r , :,4-11.2,9, m ) *~k 11 . 1 4.6 1 . - --- ,a l . 0 4 9 . . 4. t. t - i I - /- it: . I -1 '4 4 24 6 . 1.. 0 i . i. 0 4 - - 41, - OVS,19:4*76454-1,16' -~ ./ t .3 .' '~ ** *t' ..t:% 6,<t 13* f. 4. 1 -- 1. 30 ./dilli-1.4/994&~4 4 . \ ,Â·Ney.&"12*494.1- --4//1 -I k. - 1 Ai-=~AE+I"12.: r r ~~~ 1. A t. F /4<1, " *39~? C p - - fA '3 0 141; LJ k \-11 Lf. ,-i=/0 9 11Â¥k 3. f J .a . -/9 -1 ...+ tr 4 1 iÂ·-ill - '- .4-9. . .......upi-' 4 LI - t- , ....>-Tf.:, 4 12 .....4,~ ':491.: ). ..le4==0*1'*12 I I e,73> .. 'lt,.1~~:42. ' 4 E 1 , 't 1.-:061) 4)UPM'"97---1------ 1 f.I~~ F*~*Â·.;:*Al#it.jÂ·;:. : *: x ....'. - 2.Â·19*04<,- - I.41(4:6/'imvE'...it 1 711.1940**Â·,- fmtr:.1149* Â·Â·:,2 .. 1. 1 J 4/44. .: . 6~13 Â· . 1.1.. 444~.1 4 9/ ' Â·.2 g .5 . 11 , 1 . 1- 02-1. 2 4. O t .r 1.- . 1 . 0 9, . 1 8.2 1 I 2 .....#-* -t Â·4 1 4Â·r , CdÂ·I / ! r I 6 .4 - 4 : Ph' 1 lili -41 . e k 4Â·&3LU':'' , tÂ·t.Af J . Ir------ *. 1, i 1 J , , 1 11 ; :''t'.1 2Mt'.Al .. 4... , i 1 01. IÂ·-*pki, UÂ· 5 - 0 1 ,-al . 7.7 re; . rau 1. Â·.4 :f ..; J.:'Â·:fÂ· iti'* 1 +Yt,>41 1,1/ -1,.3 44Â«L -7 T b ,4 , 1, r , . . .. 1 45 7, 11 7. 1 .- 1?f ~ '~ 111; L . AWÂ· Â·Â·2.1 Â· 12...1 ArÂ£.aÂ· :Ai,u,WI....i A( N.lillium"Mill"/Ill///1illill 1.1 ./.4. .. nt a' f 8.04.6; u ... 4 r . - fA--,-=,-,-N=t-*Ltu .......... 1 . r 11~ 4 65......Mi."P,4 .... .mypnrgy' 1.... ' '.3. . 1.,A .- . b a. f .:. Â· . : l ~,M 4 N 't ~ .' ' ~ -1, < 42 ~ ~~ ' I- * '# 4 * & ' I: ' ' e' W ' ./.9, ' '/77 *'.1 '. & 4.-' :I . 9 '. 1 + 1.. .9 --- 1 . ..t , 1 1 96. -- 1 DO: .11 . 1 ..4 f J. 1~ti,Ft.k. ' 13 Â·9Â· .. , . 9111:1* b /0 -t.tâ€¢ ' Â· .14&+. I '. , .1 . 4 I ..j:* - '*'4 20. Â£F-'-W' ' ' , r--11 *1 51 * , 1 -1... 1, Â· 1., rd b â‚¬ .'. f U. 7% 1 - .,.7,4t.,1 1 ? C..;144,43 e â€¢4 .. W'* . 4 9 ...uk k, i 9/ 4;.': liE*3~,Â« I . 11 . A..%.'3 > Â· : r ..ti. TÂ·Â·Â·.0-t*24Â¢ .,fi'.00 - 31,-Â·36 Ws 9 7' . f.:19.tiwg *:..:'torry:-:. '. 7' .YL. ~Â·".~ . &~ 7 4 r . 3 ..Â· r-'. . F - 4 -7 : 4 , . 2 K ' IiÂ·Â·'. ~..'. IÂ·...--':17. / m. t.,Â·.2**P.%$Â£,~/ 11 .4, 47 21 -I + 5.m ., . It:* .. L ..2.w . ~~Â®.~.j~. ;1 4, ! f .. . t't<"4 9,7>-'.Â·.:v:Â·'JAN~titf.- ,:Sf...2'.-, :9 2 ..7 5 ,~ 71. ' Â·f.,545< I 62.4.4 *A, 4-tu:Le<Er>Â£*Eg 'rÂ»# Â· I. . . . ' "54Â¥, CM-â€žf I Â·.. 7' â€¢i- -. .i Â· . t. 1. . 47 = . 3-Â· Â· 0 .4 1 'r: b : 4:14.4 . , 1 1 . ..... . . 1 ..(L lili. .. 2.1 4 i.4 Â· . . 14" ..1 . , 0 9 rt . .1 11.4 //41' 4 'Â· i ' f '.... ,, 0. 1. . 7 7.~ Â·44 ..4... t.. I ' ;Â·37 -- Â· i i. ... . . 42, 4431 ~-17. 1 y.4.'i.. ,--Â·' .~ , ~, 4 '|Â·~ a.% *'Â·'.1 ,; , ' ; 5:2.4:.If .1 1.-,~4~'.Â·Â·' .r .t 1 76.41,. â€ž0 /Â·4' Â·iÂ· Â·-I.4 , 0 , 4. 3 ,9 , . I ' . /r . , . .jÂ¢P '*ei./. 1 0 ... V .4 /M#/f,ir Â¥it Â·F~f~~* 7,5 ...~ #4 4 - t: :4Â·'iÂ·TÂ·:..'-M. 7,1''f t.*di,/: (,1. .. ~i. ki;:IÂ·f~,#*r . ' '1 . Â¥-1 191('.1.,C,; -4~.t * Â·AL#~~~~t.5 40-31'ju ~.39+Draci Â·...Â·7 k#al.;42< - v '-' I : f 91 . - - 03-rÂ¢333,71~514-:* . . 7..1 - . *Â©C '" 1 0 . ' 776...1 ..: LO:$4Â·. 4 ':z..'2Â·k-3~ . 1 Â· , 1 . I :1 3- 1.4 $. . 11, . 4-t'., " ,1- 'k- ' ' ' -..1 . J ... I f '411 r., ~~AÂ·K#4126*Jibralfkp:.bC, Â·~-*k~tiftÂ·Â·13',2' ,'..,i.:..: :i'. #,2, lu,Â§@~0~ 14.4,-â€¢{: . 1:. . 5:4:Â·.i' ~ 4 'Â· ' Ulm--f V. . i ...t/55% 'Â¥wful'L. 1.: 1. 4*Â£ 3, ,, 7 %-.6-.--Mi~.~3 'Â¥â€¢Ce.,Il . ./. ...... 1.... 1.- , 1': f.'.Iy--4:. ..3.7.'3~ .. <t . 45*421> ~ 1 0-:1 33.1 14:1 - 1 .... 4#t â€¢. Â·5 1 -*. 1 - ../. ' 3...'.4,74*413'.7,9~ . 4 -9 -I../.I ; .. re : /24*Â·Al.ti-L 1 . 1.- 2 0/0 16 -116 .4-- -e .- - .I:*41+ ~ '- * h. -,i ...:P . ...9 V â‚¬ 9 f .:1.23 , I Â·- Â· . ...V.,3.-â€¢.?~-742/2 - Â·AÂ¥'*eÂ· Â·Â·<-42'Z?Â·Ot.%%.-v. I"I.& ....& 42*,400* 474266.2 '92. . ../C,FV 2:~::g.41**2*/pih#4- -9?~.-4â‚¬F,i - ' :'5Â·7, i 'G,Â» ' '2'.:* r :-2Â·4Â·96,Â·'*:4,12 4.-' ~''Fr~'tiÂ¥i.*0Â·: - ' . 1 1 ..4 ...... Neeb.93=~. 0-3 , Â·.2,,~A..Ailt.:IN-: 4 . 7"M-'Â· . . . .Or,-,9C - 0 ..14...2-â‚¬4 f, 42*94.Ex. 1/ImilimalÂ£*33,"2&, 0#= 1--362 - ~ ..1/Em *ett. - tfi 3*u, _-I 36 ~' L. . Â· Â· Â· -- : .i -,~-Lit 42 ' f ..... 4'.#Abl / -6 -9, - - .,mz- '41"'.14.: * 4.-y..21.4,1--OL '-?=.*flim ' *.*Râ€¢Il .'#'â€¢92Â· A. -r_- #- 9,3.1.,4 ./ 2. Â£ 4~ ./.i'#Il--.. .... p *., ,> Ji**UEN'/////m/L - Â· â€¢ W - 7 -/9.-rre *M.Il--.1~~' ~"'*""'~"" -"w"'â„¢ Â»-L~--*F~Â· '- ,Â·Â·45~ 1 Hiljmlili1iyliWililliql2ilipililiMmigisililir#Izillf:lit ir'i....1 -1? . 1 4 @re. i - ~... - 4394lt:2. L 112~ ~ ..'.-I-- . r- 7%Z. . I . ._*4 iyete.. ..44#'Â·.11,-tle.... Â· 43---1' W.Â· ~1Â·~f.Â·f~Â·.Â·3 hi,fÂ·-,2311*~;lij f-:~{13Â¢ 62 -Rk-~~;il~.7 ... ~. -11 *Â»,12.% tw .14.- 9!rt ' liliÂ« . 61*11..,b , i - .1 !* 1 -19Â¢13 11 1 - 11il 1 - 1-* f;1%Â£ii 4Â· 4----1-: f4*1 Â¢193.. Â·k: 4 4 6 - ' 1 ' 41. 41-*(31'041,31..'5 26*, f-tr 1 lilli , , .- 9 - , 1 - - - .Â· iÂ·.74-Â·:A' 33::1*,0-~;-Â·. . 1,...,3 - K V.221_y .2 -~ ---Â·-. -:.1 -~0 93> -6. 31!43.- 93 -:Â· 7- -St.; d.~JÂ·*7Â·#41.Â·42:Â·~: Â·. U44.Â·. 171.-. I. * .2,4 1--4 f- 1 11 1 *1 -1 - ~ .=. - im r.* . rv* r , 1 .. 1 1 .1 Â· 11"ll. 1 -whr~Â»*~~~ r . 1 - - --1 ':1' L V f * f - 3ht .- ; il ' - . - . - 'll, .4 -4 . -1,~' 1 - 2 ~Â·~Â·Â· j.Â·,Â·. 24%Â·.9 -47 ~ : 1 - -- ~~ ~ z 1 1 1 Â· -4 49 11.2.-â€¢ i 1 . -. 1,9 1 . 1 1 4. .1 L - b'pâ€¢Â· 11-'-,1 i'' I ;it i =-ri/*M#-'.~/.~///:.. I. . - V~- ' ' *. 2: 0'*'",1,/,I'-. =.li . 1% M . Vt /,4/19%4*566-- I 1 4.-91 . h - L k -d . . t. ..7.~ ,~ . . 'F..9~ 33- ./1 :I . 1--â€¢ Ct-+ 17?4 4.... / - . 4 . . 1-1. r./10*~9+4~:.4.EbulÂ·,h.3 IL 1 , 23 b./.: r *Â£ . ./F2.- I - 4....1. -f- 1 Â·: j~e- 0 - , 0 4/9/milillill/0/1/64/Z': .r *\L --- - -l-4 v.- L wÂ· /6~1---.f.-A*.-.&32*44~~ ~~.~by:-6/~5Â·.ft.- }iÂ·,Â· - ----- 11 , J i- .(4Â·Yea ./.1.12:, .636**~&;. ": *24>42 Ae~:t~,V- L~ . ......U ......, â€¢ ~* Â·W- - 2 Â·Â·.:arâ‚¬f-2.-42.. 1, ... 5. .r . kke jÂ· 47- , a.. , Mgr.. .. '. 1* .8 2//al,/4, -11/ 9,7' - J'.99&3 29'....1, , 1719*. 97"m I. I 4.: . - .7 '.. f 1,41:2 9 ./:t I AL.Vit _ 0 ....& a.'*g.4 # . .. a If .14.1 - . . Â· Â· I 5 g r.~..2/kah'W.*14 4:Â· - - â€¢ ~.1 lit-Mi '' - - - ,-4. - ... ..#3Â· .h. 4 -4 Â·Â·- . I . Â· - . Â· .1,Â· ~Â· 1, I: 1# 1 4 ~ I . F :: ' : *<.' iÂ·,4- 4-Â· 94*~.. , . 4 I. ......... * N. . 1*; I. 2%&38. ~./- 4 :4Â£'ll .' -4 -â‚¬.1 f :-2- 1, 2 .Â· .I ,â€¢4Â·,â€¢J,k < e . I. -./. I.h . , . Ir--â€¢,â€¢e.*./ l. y , *-1 0 2 qg 1 E . 4,9: .~ ~ ~ F#EFI :.7 ~ 2*ee 4,1 r ...6 .Aff.4 , c-4,40 ... T ,# 'JA '-~~ t.:. ..1 : , :3.-4 - 'L - /.- I.,Il . -I. - - *I -f ...... I. -/ I )'I . .. 7... ' 6 + 1.< a 44. .._ - ...ty P ':1:,a.St .:0.4.13ALÂ·, . . 1.9â€ž4...~k#P#**ta..InÂ·-1..=?6..t . , - . F 1 - 11 j. Â·B - f. t- Â· Me: V. r 4 .17:,4 4 - . , --. . 9-Ze,/ r '55 , r - - 0,2 .21~ 2 . - .... : â‚¬.â‚¬2 . D:.1~.4, 15 50 3 i i I .A . ' + Â·f 'UÂ· '2* e...- Â·. Â· t.,eÂ·:*Â·trg~'4â€¢2~ rÂ·''5%-Â·uÂ·Â·.2'. A.0 3- I.-Â· I. 9 Â·' -t,-I /1 .. It. ./-- ./4 . f . . I I * f- . 9 - I Ntic....4,7. .-- 134Â£4.63*;ffle--i rs .p<$'il. M.:... / --. :sr/Â·. -*Li# *&Â·. 44.*Â·-: 5:13Â·1'C!Â·8!i~Â·. I - . Â· ~ -. Laun 24: -- . 4.#- : P A Excercise , 21 3 f. .3...f, - 4. - I . f -1 - a ....... . I I./..&44-0. - u A -'Â¢Â·.'Â·.'â€¢â€¢Ct6 Slf- -1.,Â· i,./,; . I Â·- 1- 9.--- I. 3,Â·Â·Â· - I :911/* tel. 1 . I . . ~t...'~t- ~ '> Â«3~ ~,.41 -222Â· # . - # ... i. 12.1.. , - . , .r#*â‚¬r....d~-- 4/4 -7 ... -3. ).1.. 1 I 74. . .1. .1 0,It .3- t: ..' -1 A Â¥ I ..*. MY: Â·'~ 3 U I f I 1 ' . 7 4343M70 U'N"tâ€¢'.' 1'4'Â· i -'Â»- t. . . - . 1 . 1 E-AL 4--~4**I"I 7 =* - 1 ..42 e1.2:~ :-j:* i~t ~ 34,2 1 ~ ~ ~'52 9Â£3.23 J..1 T E 4 - - Â·Jf Â· . . -- *61.. 7. .bue, 4,1..'.Z.... 1 4 VAnâ‚¬ ; i Pantry ..8 4 , â€ž I. n .-. Â·L ... 4 . - 9.le'.,4....4- '- 044f.-r-, en~13. --4 - r -3 - A %'- .ik' 1$:1* 4. 'Â£ ' 41.- . . ,> 2 .4 J 24 ./. '. - ki-, --- 2 0 - '* 2 J .. . 4 92:* 5 I PÂ· 4. -5. I -'.-2. v -i 0 4'i Mil .4. ..- 4, A. 0.72*y'. . * .2 4Â· ~ 7 ...3 1 AX 1~~32.~~~ , 1/ '4 ... 4. I . 7 .4.0 ,#~/93 + L ..61- 4.1 - 4- ./94 4 . ..5. . .: Â· 2:7 " . - - I. 1-.LÂ·'&Â£,el gg .0, .:ISS*A WI R: Â· ~..~634 , ...Â£ 113 72,2 . : 1 ASPEN DAILY NEWS, luesday, March 25,1997 I'tigt LOCAL Historic Paepcke home to feature modern addition Original sleepy bungalow has been changed many times, latest addition is another evolution By Ben Gagnon mark in 1980, meaning it has"lost Aigm D-,N- Eemor its architectural integrity," Amidon said. Ful Two of Aspen's most famous Indeed, a second story was ~ ~ and influential families once lived added to the original one-story at 414 North First Street. bungalow early in the century. Now, the new owners want to As a result of the many build an ultra-modem addition to changes, Amidon said in her rec- 1 ~~:~~ ~j~ 1-~~~~ the stlucture. ommendation that she is "viewing -- And while the home is consid- tbe physical preservation of the ered a historic landmark, Aspen building in a more flexible man- Historic Preservation Officer ner ..." i 722Ble-B Eli 1 [de Amy Amidon is recommending "It's remarkable how many 1 1.1 1_1-111'6: ure _ 2-2---2...1 11 approval of the project. changes have been made to that ... At the tender age of 24, David house, which have led to structur- Robinson Crockett Brown came al stresses," Amidon said. 'llie to Aspen in 1880 without a penny floors and the roof lines are sag- to his name. Four years later, he ging. was amulti-millionaire, "The people who bought it , He eventually owned power, have a strong feeling about the This is one view of the proposed modemistic expansion of the historic Paepcke home at water and light companies and house. They didn't buy it for a 414 North First Street. This side will not be visible from the street. numerous mining operations. He , scraper. Essentially, from the also established the first bank in street, you're going to see the Aspen, and bought the home at same thing. But because the house 414 North First in about 1909. has lost its architectural integrity, His son, D.R.C. Brown Jr., sold they should be able to do some- Council cautioned on deer habitat the home in 1952 to Walter and thing creative on the private side." By Carolyn Sackarlason west end of the property next to the ABC' Elizabeth Paepcke, who had In her recommendation on the Aipon Dall, Now, Stall Writer or on the far east end next to the new established the Aspen Skiing project, Amidon says the portion Corporation in 1947. lhey also of the building facing North First Maroon Creek Club development. Aspen resident Joy Caudill cautioned "It's a shame to destroy a real meaning- ~~d~heotlielro~,pj~:~T.e atid ~h~ee~i*ugls*c~omm-pribauwiTi city council members Monday to be care- ful piece of habitat without looking at alter- Walter died in 1960 and is in public view. Even that patt of ful how they plan an affordable housing natives," she said. "Please take this serb Elizabeth passed away in 1994. the building is largely hidden by development just outside of town. ously. We have a chance to keep some thing The City of Aspen recently purchased meaningful," The new owners of the home am landscaping. Jonathan Lewis and Robert By peeking through the land- the Burlingame Ranch property for $2.6 Councilwoman Georgeann WaggamÂ® million, which includes about 250 acres on agreed that development should go soille Posada. scaping, the public will be able to both sides of Highway 82, east of Sardy where besides Deer Hill. Historic landinarks often fea- see some portions of the hew Field and the Airport Business Center. lure historic architecture, and addition - "a subtle suggestion "At some point, we are going to iliivt And while there are no plans for the our wildlife habitat out with urban areas. additions ale required to be "com- that the building makes a transi- property as of yet, the city may use about patible in general design ..." with tion within the private area of the five to 10 acres for affordable housing and erty) will make great affordable housitiv the existing stnicture. site." she said. "But it (another part of the prop leave the rest as open space. In this case, Amidon has deter- A Hallam Lake Ilistoric Caudill warned that putting affordable and MAA housing." mined that 414 North First was District was once considered, but housing in the middle of the property The Music Associates have expressed established as a historic landmark no designation was made. The known as "Deer Hill" would be a waste of interest in using the development for sea because of the history of the peo- majority of these buildings in the precious wildlife habitatt sonal housing for its summer music stu pie who lived there - not area have been remodeled, â€žI' m concerned (because) there are dents, as well as deed-restricted units for because of any outstanding his- Amidon wrote. places for affordable housing other than Pitkin County employees. torie architecture. The Aspen Historic smack dab in the middle of Deer Hill," City staff has proposed that the council In addition, several substantial Preservation Commission will Caudill said, "It is a good habitat for ani. allocate $5,000 from the Housing/1)4 changes were made to the home consider the project at its inciting mals and birds. It's unspoiled." Care Fund so it can work with the design before it became a historic land- Wednesday night. Caudill suggested that any development and planning team assembled by the MusicÂ· be near other urban areas, such as the far Associates. LUNCH AND APRES SKI .11#â€ž=- =:-= === =,a =.1#b. AT APRÂ¢$ sp LARGE LUNCHES! ~ THE TIPPLER F-3 ~ APR~ SHI EVERYDAY 1:30 - 5:00- 1 * WEDNESDAY 3/26 Pekins Chicken includes entree. rice, soup. salad. egg coll, wonton and fortune cookie LUNCH 11:30 - 3:00 L 44 495 44$/ ~ 50 , 0.75 Each ~ TUESDAY 3/25 Chinese FeiÂ¢lval' A $1.50 Fat Tire and Red Lady Drafts - THURSDAY 1/17 Sesame Shrimp $1.50 Bud, Bud Light FRIDAY 3/78 Buffet - $6 50 All U-Can-Eat 44,9 $2.00 Margaritas SATURDAY 3/29 Shrimp Chow Mein SUNDAY 3/30 Szechuan Chicken a Vegetables LUNCH SPECIALS DAILY MONDAY 3/31 Poill in Plum Sauce lappy Hour 3pm - *pm Ampen4 Fave~Me Phce for Dancing < 2ONIGHT TUESDAY NIGHT FEVEFf Lunch & Dinner =ned conlinuou,1, 11:30,m Â· 11:00pm 820 E Cooper. Gard# 1.8 h k e O~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~| Atthâ€¢ 1- *fAKIMW.talâ€¢ .,"AskA,v L.car W9p.--bm-=1 =:.0= 'pm. 2.m . 1 ego \410 = L//- ~ X 6% .. >C - 1 7877.9 . /7 -7 . - 7879.3 , 0 L l f l.>~ 7 1.-Ee - C = Clon f x 7879.6 ~<:~ x 7878.4 1 f ' .0 .- 4 L i EL~ c~ __*_ ~00 t> -- .ltÂ· 111 1 11 /403,1 C , i -. 1. , . A- v ' X ~ -~ 7879.42 01.-\ ~ , 1 X An - \ x \ x 7881.2 Â«031 - - - j ~ I 1 1 TX' E C Â«IL 1 1 u (Al \ r '. 1-% 1 \-9 - 1 \ L&/- -- f ff'- -- \1- + 1 04 - X 2-23 r -1 414 N. Fi rst St. \ 5 Site Plan 7-Li 4-1 3.\ IT X \ 30 60. \ 1 11 1 \\ -- 401.rpl NbAN A 1. - . 1 ===2 Cy; 0 WEAH A . ill 'Ee' - 11 ~~ ///5/I L 1~ 9Â«17+ ExlyrINe ReF HE 6 1 21 rtbrE 111 Â£54- 711 , 1 - D-- . H \\1, 1 - = -,4 9-0 fE ta 01 Whir _== r--\1~ d W - - Et& 'Â·47" 7 -Â»--ir- 1 -- --794 70 ' . , . -1 -2- 3Â£Â· -- ......= - I -34 5 1 - ~ -Ill-P --1.,1.1- - --- -1 . - W -=1 - . -1 1- r -' - ' ' - 1,3 - f.1- f -- i t-t,t41+ - - W E,67 -~ 414 8. FIRST W. 6><peTA etee. HTE t t Z b LLI ~ N N W 0 = m 11 Z\ 0 N (49 D l O 1 1 1 /1 < 1 // 0 1 . f \ < '441Â· , 2./~' ~ *':" ./ -- 14Â¥' 00 4, 3 .~.; r,Â·r. , - 1 . 00 ' -- * ,:ti.pir, .-1 , -4 - Â·: 24 14<'f'&,4112 1 ~:~5-f4*jeji:41.1.Â·2':,3 -21 '6Â·t 1, 1 ,& * p.*, 1 J - 1- -O ''. 1 , . , 1 - i,G:CSÂ¥2, I -1 1 r :.:.: P' 2Â¢ 4,7.;rvÂ·*55*, 4,- . - *EVA,j:; 1 , ./. - 1 .0,1~ 4 1 ..9..... ., I. 1 r. 1 ' '12/2- 4/4 I .: I : ' # '71 ../2# â€¢'~ 'I .â€¢. Jr f' 6 2- N- W: Â·r 1 , r . 7'f{.1012>.i-'~ 7*SAC:Â·ft;*~- , 4 , 7 . 1 0- , 1 1.- I f,Â·13..:.456 - 37 , 1-fSE&.I'.. , .' Â·, .- AÂ·Â·â€ž:i.1,~ -5 2 \ dy~fit>*f-Â£ .0~31*141,4.*r I I. -. 4 2. rt .U,~f#&M,<%7: '25:-~6'* S.4,4 'rÂ·O,-,#P:24'*7 .7,.-1 f . 1 '42 1, , 1%0Â¥4:/CH. .1 - A & 7,-PA..2-#4:.11,39 7+: 2-4.'Â·-3.,14 -2 1+2 -- :, 0.':-01.fl" ,1*'-W,,0 ,7 07 3 f *39 '44 '' S f,LIFI'Wilp,#Ah,Lizip .SOf-'Â« ., .' . iâ€¢ i..,. i .Pj,Â©2~91,34&221. . - - 0, E . At ' - , . ,- I J#' ,Â·t Â»Â¥&0735,9#*,3..~ - .r:=41941: Ii' ' -.,16.99% i 2,$0:...6 3: I. . 4 .- 1 by F- 4.91*15*k ' 1 41'. t. . 1. , ...6, .2-&416.1,1/ .1 1 '9.2 1... :I f ... 1. 0 4 1*:id#/035111'Wt .r:i:.3.0 ' I .tan:9/93*Obft :434.j)'4Â· 4 =- 4,011'i;~it,Jiâ‚¬4 5 , :, 9, 91 4(:71 6-~ :':ts:~:~I~. 1 1,. -r'.14'.*,0 IN 23#703,7,40,01;1 ,.,, .12 1 ~'~Vp#r. '1,4-" pr.r - .4.-96 ,/. 21 F .1 7& 1 - --. , - - 24 xj .r .a. 3 ike . : 2&rfi#.---: .,1-? 29271 Â»Â«426Â·t;:5>~ - 4 FE*'~' i.i:***3*i~~ -- . ~ 1,6~14.AfiSM' 9,0. r.*4?Ap ~t~of Â·Â·.,1 *:, + - 1 . r \ 49. , L .i, , .1 , - 1 ' 1, ./.1 -2 1, 1 0. 0 - ~ T <fin".tier,AdE:~4074: r 12 4.4 F c .. .'-' 5.'' 0 1 - Â·'' ' : - 1... Al ~ F.,-j< i . 1 J .. / . 1, .2. , I ., I . : -\ Rei.>:,j -~ .,~F j. 9 e,Â· ' N *,h / G . 1..... - -f ... 'd.ki#< vrcj:- ,rwpÂ£r: TFAMYL-T..1'"~Â¥,Â£ . I I Â· - -4NAÂ¢I~lj17421'; fy-',,8 le:.Fv , .1 I 1*W41414 .*-,4.eyz>21'dits'.1/3ir Â·-rjGâ‚¬. z f., Â· 21,&2, . 9 -4Â¥%: I . .1 4 k 1 ..4. A n -- .2 Â·Â· d ..14' w. 4 '1. 1 1.3 1 2~ 71. # , .,1- , - 9,1~4**6 12.-3 3,8#rt..2*,;14-0,..: ~r . '.. e. .3. 4 ** . 2 /1 I */ I# I SA*.t'Â¢9-Â·1*40Â·.Â¢m44*t,i yp. ,-22"4 ~ -71//4/Vitr~4~*kf Â·.,22-1,~FÂ·'0-: f 'f , 2% .. 't \ ,: r- P ,Â£*52:EM@eut,, 0, h ,?~56pk-:)~4Rt <S'ft,,Vi '1 ....,. . , I ,# .'. 'I -â€¢P . - - , . 4-1.':.:14-r':ril,>31,77:-1119-24>61 i~- - 1:~â‚¬ 1 "~ 2 1VF*4*MiXW:*MUP*i,~&. 16 1(#gRA&#1f&&Â£%Â£i~l' , p: , (i'~'fâ€¢â€¢,&~61 5 *~Ibm#L##IMK, i?ocf,j'~'C%*40 %- 4 UMB 4yw7f'<46 aC' â€¢21:9Â·#F: .Ei''a Â·,04..R7,1f&#Q,762,~**AM<Kn~~~~#'A l,X ~ ij w.. â‚¬46 t I . 1 % - 1 1 1 1 , 011. .1 4 . t * lim_ Â· r.,,2,~,-iJ-t ...0 B. I 19 1 1 . 7. 9/Kir 2, I.idÂ·Â·,4. - ' 4. 2 %,u~*94 --4(44-*A95 1.r#72=VATeir/1:1*L Ulte f ly", r , , , â€¢-. câ‚¬.r Â· 'r derrilte'~3Â·67 MA*;'* ..231 -''*411'yt.*,"Fill P, t ? '90 : Â· .2% . : - -, ~ AU **L'*Fr, )90 ' D : r. 1 , ..: $ ./ . 1 1. f . . .Jw' : '4Â·r, t.qi*4*,- . 3.yr i Re 4 4 444 1 - c '14 ' , ' ' 4 1 ' 2/1, , * - \ ....1 - ... f . 4 ; 'kir' " 4. . â€¢ 1 Ae , x= I I Ar . . ' I . I- Â·hâ€¢. I . 92.4 3, I , .. ' ' 1 ~ i J"Ciphi' 157 -" e.~ .6, la, I , P # P .- 4./39*EV#.-r.t' . d. ./.- ' I .- 12&. , De r . â€¢..ul., â€¢- - .11*142~~1. . f 1 + . ill \vidit,trÂ·r, ST-w,46*,w . 4. t -'EM,mil,, 3-,4.1, '50'11:1 F -, - .=. - ; i~Z~) .4_Â· 1 'â€¢fÂ·â€¢41t.J'~,1 hia,lfpr --MAY#. 1#t . J , 4 , A .Fle l . :F 1 , , ./ % .- 1/=&/A# , - 7 ' ' , agimi~%*%92)Â¥1*a . 46.2- . --+6~4-ir -*. 4j .: ~~~+47%~ t{~Af-I:~~.~FIi*Ep , - - .9 ~f 'k' ejummeiy.2: 2,} 1,-2, V~IW~9 1~-2 '- "'V :SA~f# 1 t. .9&. 1 5 fÂ·n# ('4:,f'~ Â¥-' Â·' diâ€žr ..,4 L Jf/ . 1*2Kmltijlm-04$5-11â€žâ€žpi, w .1~.' .,â€¢~~-Â¢,i!20,5 -4 " -- " ' .ift* A:~Â·a,@f 31'*02$. f i 2,5Â·-2/2///.~//)/ran##VAL='4'- <9 T . - --6 4 1, k.gr /22*3Â·Â·.9/1/.' P j : 4 i. .. . 4Â¥ - 4-411, 4 ...F~.1. - - *443 i ' -/ i ~ ..1 :4-t'.3 ., 6.,A J. fefiliCT*â€ž1,5,:,/40 "Â·- - .*F ' 4'<'~4 1 ~3rfI.127 7vr -r ' iÂ·.'?.i * 443 TH~ist ry<0.aj'.{4.... Z. , ----MWal,r-,Ze ~*0Â§Â·*,i-,1 *t: -- I;'-~ I - 7 19. . 9 . r=#tz-P 1 22.0 '1.=Ar'.44 1.Â¥.. .. 1 1 1 . P . W. U '/ L INe . ..4 - <6 .r. a . f- r ' '17 , 4 0, ' ... , 11.~.:+ , + .C..12, 4 . 12; 4.2 U... Li?61~~-Ail'*,4'r*?~* id 1 1,6 . 1 1 ! t:.~ 11 ' . 2 - 15 6 ti~iÂ£6*31~043,E~:fi,~. ~~ -,1 -*Tz--- -f. E4 94/ ~ ,~ Â· ' 9, thiLi< -g ./ . 1, ..61 ,.F-5,1/-â€ž . . 1- I. , : 041, &:44 1 r J IT i .- b. RF,1&447,i* 4 .. :: ,> . -1 - ' 21 . < .. Â·42~f~-12*ktu~L %411 - . .4. i - +Â·' i : J ' p'=31 1--+L *Al,/ 1 0.53*.01-#ad*1;' r.#. 4 *imepâ€ž7 vayâ€ž- --- - 24 1 . '51 -11 , . Â¥ . A k .- ....t..%.*=Ne, ; 0 - , 41&â€ž -... -. , --4.1 , 7%29 -J 1 , . 5 47. 4 //1 .f 3 4 %'r 1;*Mar: 97:-1 - ,guL-+UN 1 ,3 , 2 4 + 1,-~VF 6 , 1. 11 1 . 2 ~ -~ 3/-t,JÂ·:21-712 . Â·i ,Â· 7Â·f~. 1 .1- , , .#bibki XM , 4 - ,N -It.'. .,.....:.- 0 '4 :*& . 4 - A.A. -/ , y ''f, 2 024051<' ' 56, -. r-- -- -- f~ - - - - i.t f [,1 1- -14â€¢2dy Â»* . , f :' I /4 1.,+AL, ' . 'te. -1, /1 7% 1 11 'jil 1 1 [6~ 15 -L-T-1- R r f 110] ' 1, 1,1, 1 &/Yni -/1 72 0 . t f C 41:91...lip:"EN L te'lof' 10 .~ ..4~- f. 1-4-z i .1 1 .rri 0 ' - 1199 . .4 1-1 r -40.t. t '34Â£42 ,a,27-â€ž.-~ :Â·~. ~~_-,4 1,4 1,1 ! i Â·*,r~ .* af.e*,FF.lfld~ fr . .0..4. 7 E- 111 1 ilili 1 4 A [ 1,1.. 1141.1 !1 4,11 -4 IA +2-1 'll ' I 11 ' 1 : 4 4<*4*f 'Wra.-7=-A- g,0 Â£MRF- ~0*Z~(1-i6, - b: J~~*.~*/6SS ~ -~' ,. f hi ' /* 1. 1 1 f 1 1 ' 11 ' r , . I. 4 r. , Â· . )57 1959, u . . '- 1 11 , I . 0. 97 ... ; 1, 4 . 4 > -11 - -- , , . 4 44 .52Â§ $*042'15, 0 444*f *. 1 - 2. Â·32â€¢ 1 Â® A C 1 vt ix 41 1.9271~. ~ r J J ..: f A $. . 0 1 V. I l< . . 9 e - -, 2 16' 1 'frm 1 1 I t . f t i -- 1 . 1-/ - 6 4 1. L i / 1 Vld 31IS opeioloo 'uedsv lee.,ls ls.1!=I 4JÂ·ION *1.V *01'40JV/Cinoje Uuell.lau33 041 9 ..'41 F L 1 - . 1 - 11 - 1 1 -2,- 4 ty'.143 t.:mag 1 l l C I. *-W - - u Entry -1 Coats Pwdr 1 - â€¢L 1 V i i . 0 . ---I----I--7 /1 4 U j Bar 7. * 1 1 0 1 Office ~ 11 1 11 1 u 113 1 1\ 1 -Ul \ - 2 -0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 / * Living $ . 1 7 1 Library 1.U 0 / I \ , 1. - ---- ri -* 1 -- -- r=*. T 1 r-- ' 4 -U i~*r--W-Ze-$--.. 1 U // . . 1 , - 344 i. ELI 1Â» A/ 0 4 - r .' 1 1 1 4371 r7-2YI~ ~ Garden I Dining ---6~ KitchÂ¥ln Sitting Breakfast -1. 7--- -77 11 1 111 1 li======611 -1 0 -,4---*t-1 1 1-- j/66/f= I- -- . // 1 2- --_Ii f e 14 1 1-11-----1 u 1 7- I >servi41 3 1 -b. 1 Eptry 1 --- =-4 1 2 6.1 - N L,/ i 11 1 .M r--i - r- Li 1 ! *4 + u I '1 ~~4.. -4 >1' --- L _.1 Mud L. 3 FwÂ® 1 5 Pantry [Ii o 1 TWIr-Mick-0-- 4 U ' 1 / 1 1 f , 1- ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 1 ' 1/8"=1'-0" 1~ / Ele* 1 - lu. d P Garage 1,/N-/\~ storage I 1 i b !1 8 7 il ;1 1 1 11 /01 1 / 7 -.--. 1 /*'- ## --- - / 1- i - 1- \ / 11. /- Bunk Room due st Suite No. 1 2 1 It .1 i 4. -. Ch. j,/\ 1 1 u.Â£ PÂ»Â»- 1/' \\ 1 1 1 1 2 j l-Â·~ -- 71 U -- -31 1 . 4 -i - ./ 4 i ../.. 2 - - 0 , - . 1 ./ / 1 < ' Open To 1 '-h-- -I. - 4 11 1 lu 1 i., .1 ' Below -\/ : It \\ 1 1 1 './ 11 1 1 \ 1 . 1 \ 1 / 4 i 1;1 \ / Guest Suite No. 2 11 1 ' Sdting J ~ i ; 6 -2, ' . 1 1 14,-i --- -- - 1 , 1>=Â» I ---7 - Decti 1 -Â· Deck ~ 1 --4 1 \1 . U I / \ i i /' 1/-7-- - ~- --- - ... - 1r- r-r . h r-, A 1 P i I '..1* li- lilli ./1 ( 1 Garden Below Deck ; Master Sitting ' Master Dresbing i Irn N Lav. M~ster Bedroom ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -I...==- 1 1 % 11 1 1 ~-~,-i~'~"T"tu~~- 797.-7.- f- 4 v-_t 1 - _-dr I I I -- -il I ' 1 1 ...t l - N 1 0-1 r---Â· i LI El L _-1 li-17 1 v j Â·- U - LJ 1 i .: 11 ! 1 - 1 1 _ -_ __ ~ Bath t A /"I Y 1 \ UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN I 1/8"=1'-0" -. \/ / I 1 1 1 - 1 1 ~ L_____1 1 { 2Â¤2221 1 L '1 1 d 1. --- - -1 11 1 11 1! i I' - , 1 -t i l, i li 1 , 1 i !' i 1 1 11' .i i i -4 h-- 1 li k-Â· i:.# 1 i, lili . 1 ./i -I : 1 11. liii i I 'li i -- i iii h Roof Terrace 1, 1 i 1/.1 i.#----* -_ ~ 1.-1. i , - t -, N 1 j 1-Â· --. $ I - 1 \ . 1 1 , r*, 1 1/ - . \I ATTIC LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/8"=1'-0" :rm-4.,tÂ·. / -1 ----1 , i i i Unexcavated 1 1 I Pool Unexcavated Mechanical 1 1 1 \1 1 ~1 4< 11 '' 1-4 ------ - . . r' pi, , - 1 L. u Storage i Pool = 1 Mechanical -_ _Drebsing~Pwdr. Steam Room plunge [1 M Sauna , i f / -1 â€¢ 1 . 0 11.0 Pool i i.l, 1 , 1 1 Av n-2 2 , , U 1 1 , El Unexcavated =-* Storage , Laundry Excercise Area / 1 ' 11.1, 17~ 4 / > .1.- . 1 .- Uj - - h ./ 0 L t' 1 W N i 11 J 1! F 1-.%-1./. Storage Pantry Wing Pool Maint. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN k liN- 1/8"=1'-0" U Elbv. -- -2 1 Storage \ Machine Rm W 5- f ..~. 4 ~ r- ..il A.,06 ' . 1 0 .ES=--*-=CLEA=Â¥2-- 242-- I 201... I . -- ...1 1 11 '1 1 ' H , 1 Ii' --Â·p i * L -11 &41 N- fl 1 , -i- 1 24 .- 1 - + I-4-39 L--1 -â€ž0.11 ~1==7 19. : ,/ -h 0/. . =i- - -- 1.=========Ill-- ./Â· uff-nu.j .._i.Â·fizzu-IZE-- LAUrEl 2-1 -7.- 4.42 1-----â€ž . - ..-I.. - ~ 1- f 1 1 1 L r-- 1 =Â·Â·Â·=7=r=Em~ 1 - _ I --- --- Â· .. 1. P=6.lili - *â‚¬4.2, 1 ==~2 1 P.=1 12_11/771 ta L 01 1 1 - --* 1 1 .. . 1 1 15 1. 4- f-4 4 '11, 1 11 t.. . 41 Â¢ A -1 - ... ''/- 4#2*~AW:.pipfÂ·1 1'2 - WEST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-02 ? __~ ,__1 -~T L. 1-1- fy ,-17-Â«- - Â· 1- . - -- 1.- '-- 7 - 1/, r . - I 4 r-1 ...'C 4 -9 -4454%41 5-: . , . 1Â¥..,0 - .' .-W t.--2- ..er'- 1 I MER#2Ny I-*air#.0 1 L---- 4 1 -1 L___. nmâ€¢ 1, =a:*r-1 . 1 - -1 25/A*â‚¬n:&'t~De. 7.z EN*Â£14*>tif 11 9 30' Â¥ 1-n - 4-~ - . - -- ' f ,-2.9,4.3,5fy -- .----.---- t. ' 1-- 1 I f -- - ------- - - -1 LICILLUE-LI- - -2 22_ ---1. --- - Â·2~2,:Â¥22 'CUE<= . 1.-'.:I. , I : -- -- Â·Â·T ..AN.P...1/ -4* Â·Â·diall'll'nMIi pil 19.4.4.#ME* 1 ......Â·* ....le= .-- Â· re *1 ~Ga=Egi tâ€¢lE#206% , ,=*,ad,v*944.,Ilk{Af~'~ M~LIM8;,Y~*~.1l 23 --1 I | ' 1~i#8 F'e'.ABI,~21 | 1 1 19=. 1 - 1 ---SNE#/// 2: 4%+ ,-Â·= pa 920*144. -- 1~ F 144 A q~L --9~ E.6&4~1 I -: -Â· #5-* 1-ga 4 -*L. ---- SNFAtiFF -- .râ€¢. Â·- ' , - 1- 4.9 d '....i 1 1 1,1 7- 1 , ak. - 4 . 1-4 i 1 ~41.00.1 3 : - 6 -Uk F*#1#407.w, 1 NORTH ELEVATION 1'8"=1'-0" . 7 4 44 1.1 .4. 1- 0* {4449.4, -4 41 lk-f 1 J Â¥r e /---~> 12 - *'X"~/it - - *WNJ.. ..__.-1 r 04*27 1,/--- 1 ===9- 7-1 Â· 1.! 1 1 11 -11 _/1 El 1 . 1 1 1 L-- -- -- p ---- - j m' 1 r//8 =F 41...... 22- Â·=, .~-.,ret y_1.-- ...4~J-=. i -~. rilm=Z-=7-.F. - - -u - - 4-- =5= 1&- ~--_- - - - ./.Â»<re-/- -- . Â·-1.8 4 1- | L- - ~*31Â·*L~E _E~-am~'~ -21=zi- ~~~:23%= ./.03-63 .'.41' liwea2*2/4649 14- ' --'rj Â· ~.i ill--Ii- 1 , 144.: 1 ..~1?, 4 'i/I -A )- 1 $5Â¥.- j Je Xy&~ .3~ - 1 . (r ....51- E im,Ai I.V.... ./4- I /1 4/ a 1 11 i.Â·La; ; 1. 11-I ...Â» WE=.09 1 - 11 11 -4-- 1. 1,4,36% 1~ 1 1, - --+ L.-1 -9Â·te. I. m EAST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" 1 9 , & 1 ' 1 \0 - 1 V :.3 L.*- 1 ' -''f..11 J ... .. 4 - 1 [171,-1~[13 t-fl~PJ~tl7~~f~ &0*03/, El , , Cleâ€¢.=0' 4 NK] 11.i 11 1 '44 [13.17.$61-,9 41 6~ Â·%>~*JIJ.*Â·Â»23*.Â»....413 ------1--1 ---Ll 1* N.m.5 51".A.P..S â€¢4"-444Â£- 1 , /4:211 23:fi /,i.: TIVE~~Pr'j'/ mitiram 9$ P ~*.'*4).'Ir*3~ 44,1 1 OPA- 1 , .--* '1 k.>7 -- . 1 u)r 0 . 1 . i,J. 11 . I 7 - - . 2-11 i J - 1 - Aki'al 1/ 1 Â£&179~1 rl _ 0'*Eq...../ 1 1 . 1 -.....4*949!4 .. ;.: 4/~A.9:5...he'*:L /' ./.64'Â·2.3:Â·.Â· e '.2?Â·1 ~2 1 1 1 t 0 -r 1- 4 , E-1 ' li 1 -1=mi~ 11 , U.=Ope./ 1/6 1 1j 11 1 0 --44, Â¢ 1 f .--J 1 i 1 $.4,1 , r.2 ... e 1 1 r , 1 1 ...11 -, . :'' Jit l , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 Â·,le- 44Â£.Â·vÂ·Â·I * '44#2 t, ' i 1 1 . I 11 1 1. 11 1 Il. C .,1 1 4. 1 1/ ..% 7 NOI1VA313 HlnOS "0-4=4/1 j --1- 9 - -41, 1 - . M C