The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.419 E Cooper Ave.HPC053-01LIJ' .UL LJ 1vl U. UV J ..~ 419 E. Cooper Minor HPC Rex U P- 5 6 4 1 1 .. CASE NUMBER HPC053-01 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-23101 CASE NAME 419 E. Cooper Minor HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 419 E. Cooper PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Jeff Gorsuch REPRESENTATIVE Alan Richman DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/10/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. 48-2001 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 11/9/01 BY J. Lindt 1 0 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-23101 t DATE RCVD: ~9/4/01 # COPIES:i i CASE NO|HPC053-01 CASE NAME:|419 E. Cooper Minor HPC i PLNR: Amy Guthrie PROJ ADDR:|419 E. Cooper ' CASE TYP:~Minor HPC STEPS:1 OWN/APP: Jeff Gorsuch i ADR 263 East Gore Creek C/S/Z: ~Vail/CO/81657 PHN:|476-2294 REP:|Alan Richman ADR: PO Box 3613 C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81612 PHN'920-1125 1 FEES DUE: 500 D ~ FEES RCVD:1500 STAT: r- REFERRALS .*4,4~4~4444444, REFL j BY| i Duel MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED ............. ' -wm-w.Â·.~ DATE OFFINAL ACTION:| igijgtol CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ ~~â€ž-m '"'""""""""""""""""- * pr H Ac 44) e, + 99223)01 BOA: CLOSED:| I I/9/0/ BY: Il:_ 614 k J DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN:1*0~2043/ .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 419 E COOPER, UNITS 101 AND 201, PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO.~, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, jeff Gorsuch, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 419 E. Cooper, Units 101 and 201, Park Place Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character o f the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity o f a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Christina Amato, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting of October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of ~7 to ~. .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED'. 'f~ That minor development for 419 E. Cooper, units 101 and 201, Park Place Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved as proposed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: / I. LO - 0 David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 1001 AP MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Anne Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Christina Amato, Historical Preservation Intern RE: 419 E. Cooper - Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: October 10, 2001 SUMMARY: This non-historic structure is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. The applicant requests HPC approval to convert an existing window to a recessed, street-facing door with a more traditional awning and sign. The existing door would be converted to a window and all the tinted glass will be replaced with clear glass. APPLICANT: Jeff Gorsuch, store owner; represented by Alan Richman Planning Services and Tom Frye, Architect. LOCATION: 419 E. Cooper, Unit 101 and 201 Park Place Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core," with a historic district overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after 1 .. making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2),for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The existing building will remain essentially unchanged. The current doorway space will be replaced with a window of the same dimension. The existing window and awning will be replaced with double doors of the same dimension and a new awning. The proposed changes exemplify the traditional Victorian style of the Historic district with a recessed, street-facing entry way, kickplates below the windows, clear glass to replace the current tinted glass, a rectangular awning and a basic metal hanging sign above the entry way. Note that the owner submitted an alternate design for the door and awning which they prefer. The proposal is more compatible with the character of the district and Cooper Street than the current faGade, and therefore is recommended for approval. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and replacing the current fa~ade with the proposed one is an improvement. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the significance of any designated structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal will not impact the architectural integrity of any designated structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 2 .. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application for 419 E. Cooper as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution # , Series of 2001, finding that the review standards have been met." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2001 A. Staff memo dated October 10,2001. B. Application. 3 Tw r .C...CLI~ ./.-- - 21 L 11 0 Ill\\\ 111 \\ -:11 .C. 11 P \ - 11 \'X 1 Ir h j \ \J, PULL i\\1 \\ Â¥ 1 j ill 1%< ..117 \\ 4 1 U) Cob F R. AMâ‚¬ ( j,- - .. 1 - 11 4 44 A 5 - 1-3:34-1 '1~32 301* 4 //1/ OCT. L 2001 10:10AM GORSOCH LTD VAIL NO. 0038 P. 2 12 t K 00 . 60, i 0 NAU V Itt Lkt= (Iizil 1 12 0 M Ce 02 4 4/PL,ota:Â» 4- 41- 7Â«Z+e wâ€¢,ITE LETTET,wi - U'.4 111 1562.DEL . 1 (btA koo M 1,4 6,- no stripÂ©â€¢5 24- nEW y bpo< d,rk\14+46~A0 i 0:NELLS & T, 1. 2001 10: 1 DAM GORSUCH LTD VAIL ~ ~ NO. 0038 P lot AL METAL AAH E- 0 RSUCH Â£754 - - ~- -Awk-5 07â€¢ (1 6,412,; (fu#. - _ +Lk f e.< ~-< 62 -INel -4<YLL'VE,09/E/*--1 - EA C (411&45 1 8. k 601.0 5-D MAU- 0.1- 04,4.,- C 1 OCT. 1. 2001 10:10AM GORSUCH LTD VAIL NO. 0038 --"P. 3----- .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 9 1 9 2, 6 Â«70 4, r , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 10/infol , 200- 1 -l STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, \--TJNd â‚¬ S lk / '14 ON- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: -~C Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an o fficial paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public headng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) o f the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses o f property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal o f this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement o f an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners o f real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. /la/4,011 r 0941 v-L,/ ~i~gnature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_,by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE ''~ ~'0'~ RE: 419 E. COOPER AVENUE- MINOR HPC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing My commission expires: will be held on Wednesday, October 10, 2001, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen 1 Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Gorsuch Ltd. requesting minor HPC approval to alter Notary Public doors and windows and install an awning on the j front facade of this commercial space. The prop- erty is legally described as Units 101 and 201 of the Park Place Condominiums, Block 90, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5096. amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in The Aspen Times on September 22 4 ATTACHMENTS: 2001.(76551) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL - 1 0 A ATTACHMENT 1 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy The City of Aspen, pursuant to Ordinance 57 (Series of 2000), has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff members may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and staff can provide a summary report of hours spent at the applicant's request. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner' s time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals, up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (r o @-9 v L\~ Ljr-&, (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for A â€¢ W"-0 a. HOL- 0 2..u Lue -4.Zk (4-, t,,) (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $9/0 which is for -2, G hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing o f the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: Â»'>~26*fi Wl 11 Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Dat~~ 2\11\ 90 \ Mailing Address: 1 6 3> Â£&64 C 6 4- C Ket,<. 0 81 Â·t 4 &71 , Cole B.1. 9t65-1 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 Ale. 'Ridu~t ve~ 1&#0'u, set,ee, E. 8613 A#*. (34.44 E 1612 01)6474Â® (970) 920-1125 September 4, 2001 Ms. Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: MINOR HPC DEVELOPMENT REVIEWAPPLICATION FOR 419 EASTCOOPER Dear Amy, This is an application to modify the facade of the existing building located at 419 East Cooper Avenue in Aspen (Parcel I.D. # 273718223101). The legal description of the property is Units 101 and 201 of the Park Place Condominiums. The entire property on which the condominiums are located consists of approximately 8,454 square feet of land. The property is zoned Commercial Core (CC). It is located within the Commercial Core Historic Overlay District. The application is being submitted by the prospective tenant for the property, Gorsuch Ltd. (hereinafter, "the applicant"). The property is owned by The Continental Divide Company (see the warranty deeds, attached as Exhibit #1.) A letter from The Continental Divide Company authorizing the applicant to submit this application is attached as Exhibit #2. The applicant is being represented by Alan Richman Planning Services and Tom Frye, Architect, for purposes of this application. A letter from the applicant confirming this arrangement is attached as Exhibit #3. The modifications proposed by the applicant are illustrated on the attached site plans and building elevations. They show that the following changes are planned: + Remove the existing storefront window and replace it with a new recessed entryway that is oriented directly towards Cooper Avenue. + Remove the existing door and replace it with a storefront window. + Install a new awning and sign for the business. I discussed these proposals with you, and you informed me that this application would be subject to minor development review by HPC. .. The standards to be used by the Historic Preservation Committee when considering an application for minor development in the "H", Historic Preservation Overlay District, and the applicant's response to these standards, are as follows: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "If', Historic Preservation Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq. ft., or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: No changes are proposed to the scale, site plan, massing, or volume of the existing structure. The only change proposed is to the design of the front facade. To demonstrate that these changes will be compatible with the general design of development on adjacent parcels, the applicant has submitted a photo montage of surrounding structures located on the Cooper Avenue Mall. A comparison of these photos to the proposed design shows that the proposed design will be compatible with these structures. The design incorporates a recessed entry, oriented toward the street, a feature that is found in virtually all of the other structures on the mall. The windows that are proposed to be installed are similar to the store front windows on several other structures. Both the door and the area below the windows have raised panels, which are also found on many of the surrounding buildings. The design also includes an awning and sign, which will be compatible to the other awnings and signs found on the mall. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood proposed for development. Response: Chapter 13 of the recently adopted City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines establishes the design guidelines for alterations to existing non-historic structures in the Commercial Core Historic District. The applicant has designed this proposal to be consistent with these guidelines. In preparing the design, the applicant has been directed by guideline 13.15, which states that: "A contemporary design that draws upon the fundamental similarities among historic buildings without copying them is preferred". The introduction to the chapter states that recessed entries are a typical design element in this District. The guidelines encourage the primary entrance to a commercial building to be a recessed entry way, set back approximately 4' from the facade (see guideline 13.19). The guidelines also suggest that the recessed entryway be oriented towards the street (see guideline 13.3). 2 .. The existing structure does not provide a recessed entryway that is oriented towards the street. Instead, its entryway is flush with the building facade and angled towards the side. The applicant proposes to change the entryway so it will be recessed by nearly 4', and so it will be oriented toward the street. New oak doors, with beveled glass and raised panels, will be installed. The doors will be similar to, but will not copy, the doors in neighboring historic structures, such as the Red Onion building. The guidelines also encourage large storefront windows, located at the street level (see guideline 13.16). The applicant proposes to install new windows where the door is now located. These windows are proposed to be as large as possible, considering that the dimensions of the existing opening will not be altered. No expansion of the size of this opening is proposed. The guidelines state that darkly tinted glass is an inappropriate material to use for street front windows (see guideline 13.17). The existing window and door use a tinted glass. This glass will be removed. The glass to be used in the new door and windows will not be tinted. The proposed awning will be made of fabric, with blue and white stripes. As recommended in the guidelines, the proposed awning will be compatible in size, shape, and type with those found on adjacent buildings located on the Cooper Avenue Mall. A sample of the proposed fabric will be brought to the HPC meeting. The proposed sign will be a small scale sign, mounted on the building (see guideline 14.25). It will be made of metal (see guideline 14.26). It has been positioned over the door, to emphasize the building entry (see guideline 14.27). It is expected to include the pictographic ski symbol used in the company logo (see guideline 14.28). 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on adjacent parcels. In fact, the proposed modifications to this non-historic structure will allow the structure to better comply with the City's adopted historic preservation guidelines by repeating the historic building facade elements (recessed entryway, storefront windows, and raised panels) of surrounding structures in the Commercial Core. As a result, the structure will be more in context with the desired character of the Historic District and will enhance the historic significance of the area. 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The subject property does not contain a designated historic structure, so this standard is not applicable to this project. 3 .. Conclusion The applicant has responded to all applicable criteria of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, pursuant to the direction you have provided. Sufficient evidence has been provided of the project's compliance with said criteria. The applicant will respond in a timely manner to requests by any reviewing agency for additional information, or clarification of the statements made herein. Please let me know if there is anything else you require. Very truly yours, ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES Alan Richman, AICP 4 .. EXHIBITS AND DRAWINGS 1.- 1 ........,...'' . 1'8**u 2 kilâ€¢A â€¢ A ,.â€¢d ,'Â· b' â€¢ I , f ph.' i f # . . 4, EXHIBIT #1 E . 11,4 . Ik- 4. bo.m #329954 02/43/91 1,5:04 Re: 165,00 K 630 'r'5 964 ' ' silvLa D.nviÂ·..., Pitkin 21'Ity Clir-I-, Doc $150.06 ; , 1, '. j' BBECIAL WARÂ»2)'TY IJEED RD. RICHARD R. WOODS, rer the ROMmideration of Ten Dollars <$10.00) in hand Dald and the issuahca by the Purchaser to the Seller of 6,425 shares of the cextmort stock of the Purchaser as an Rt* exchange qualifying under Â§351 I.R. C., hereby sells and conveys to 17,; THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE COMPANY, a Colondo corporation, Whose Â¢,2 addicts is 314 South Mill Streat, Aspan. Colorado, 81511, the 11'12.4,1 fol lowing real property in the county of Pitkin, State of Colorado, .5.04 tu wit: <ti,k Conduminium Unite 101, 102, 201, 202, 301 ald 4.,W. 1 *1.41 302, Park Plate. a Mondominium, according to ... the recorded Cnhdaadmium Plat thereof appearing in Plat Bdok 13 mt Pag, 75 of the 11: C..1, redÂ¢*de of Pitkin County, Colovadot ,:f-Te:' 31%1 With all its appurtenances, and warrante the title against all permons claiming Undmr him, IUBject to and except for general taxes wix for 1991 and thâ€¢reatter p*yable in 1992 and thereafter; 11/1. 4% 1 re,r.d ALL RETERANCES BENG TO .HE REAL PROPERHZ RECORDS OP PrTKIN 1 , '4,6 6 COUNTY, COLORADO. 44% 1. .liÂ¥:lu . 1*'' ' Dated thia mist day of Decembel-, 1990. 41 >1Â¥ , 1 -2. .d f 1 1(' 1 - 2.1 b. 2*IT..-1 .' 1 #*' " i.t U '' 924 ~ .h~ ' 60 Â·~ C M .TAL) r r,c:/CAK .0, .1 1 4//1 ;-L 67 , J *40, 4 EÂ¢*ard' R.'- Roods -'U~ .. 11'blt t e .,I . 2 -A':4:*'5â‚¬ , 4 4 #9 W'. STAÂ¢!E OF COMRAEX) ) .: 74/ 3,0 1 4 - BS. '34 COUNTY OF PITZIN " .,2 4.0 1 4/7 0-'i N 1 1 lit;11 .r r 1 .. 41,41;foregoing dogument,Was, nekllottled#e# bâ€¢504 kie thi,3 12/ ltv. 4 I'l' I 345 -4 .10*ARPICUI.09%4,-, 19*.1 by Ridhhth k. Woods. 1 I. 4 -I. I A- . f .33 4{9.10 lt*.,Â·.*iteess my hand ah# peicial seal. 411 ' i&6 1 \ Mt Pommission expires: tw ., , 21,414 , - 41 'b .i: h I e .Ce P ..t f D /W 01 -v I Nvia~ b~blit- '-- f/ 14' ft*k " 2 - - 9 vâ€¢*,sweed' 1 '.'*8* 4, Mt 1% 34#,4 1.,1 ...it '' 1% , 1 4 , 41 4 > 1 41 1 . 1.1 -11/0,9 i., I, J. ... 1 4 0.1,70 11 4, . . ' , : - tar,13 9. ' 4 '.1 , I . 1 1 '.44 1,4, I Â¥' '41' 'k I ' L; ..~ PI.'. tq 2 . - ..1- . %9* Ove//3/Il/7 140 2Â·iN L/MA,Va*FigNY' F~*ts Â·Â·~tÂ·9% 9,"3.8.,9;i , V 1 ?.4 9 4 1 9,4 #338857 14'-5/01 14:14 ReÂ¢ 0,5.,-,0 9, 662 !'P 859 91].H '>,iâ€ž4â€¢. fliâ€¢Â·12; Cr~ !Â·y Opg-. 1>~,' iÂ¢"' .M R CORRECTION SPECIAL WARRANTÂ¥ DRED R. WOODS, fqiÂ· 0,6 cgnsideratfo# c f Tin Dolrito (310.00) ir, hand p:id and che isguanÂ¢c by the Furchaser to tk* Sentr' of 6,425 shares of the common :Cock ofihe Purcher 83 2 exthonge qualifying under 5351 I.R.C., 116,47 sells and conveys zo THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE .i*YO, COMPANY. a Colorado corporatfon. whofte addics is 314 South Mitl Street, Adpen, Cclorado , I. I , ..... 81611, the following mi properly in tho Courily of Pill#in, Sta# of Colarado, to witt 0 4. 4,fi . Condominium Units 101, 201, 102, 301 (ABd 302, Perk Plgee, A ; .4,Â¢21 1 Condom,nium, according 10 (he recorded Pim Â£hereof appearm: In ...\ , , 4;& Plat Book 15 al Page 38 of thÂ¢ meord; of, 1?itkin Counry, Colorado, ,9,1,4,7 whI:h supplements and gmcnds th< Condominium map recorded in Plat Dook 13 st hge 75 of those record& ., 4.7542 11.1 with aU its appurler,9110Â¢S, and â€¢*(imn[$ Ahb,tirle. 461,~st &11 penons claiming under him, subject te , *and ex,ept for gerient mes rof 1991 and'llier,miter payable in (992.and;thereator; Â·42,Â·b.i,4., A ALL REPERENÂ¢ES BER,10 -15 -'rHE ' *514,I PRMERTY ReteRDS CIF FJTKIN : 44 t..4. .') 4:'.9 ..84 COWN:LY, COIDRADO. '91; 1.4,1 f , Ded 01.of tbo 31'81 'day-6 B, Eshitiar,. 1990. 1 ' 1 1:H#bubts $ coimfeitg#;6#60*#*#~*%#*4197 Ese}Y :7 P . 791*?g:b . ..1 . I . . SUPPSEME*AL'*lkhiER?'cdka*il#iuh,kÂ»424***( ',34 0/3' 07 2 ./ r 11, 1 114 Â¢r 14) f-Â»h- 4.- , 1 1 '1'i.1~ew !: '- Richard R*'Udd&' ' f. S'rATE OP CulteRADO 3 , 4/,1 ~:t- 1 p..... :44:,#:,4, ) '#5. COUNTY OP Ptf'KIN ) , 1 . a 1 '1 .. 6 r 2, , I *BN~ 0-~rA; 1%-~documem.was ,Â¢knewied~zb<P betaA We"llfis ~~13*y of'~0*16~ 19*1 . I.- lift,19 , A .1 11'P 3:*69@Aerk,Â·IyÂ°od:4 1 , 6 .,Â·+'r, 2 f, 2 0. k 7,0-0Â« ; .1 11:6 ,&9~'PUDÂ®085,~my' hand @lld OffidalÂ·5~21. 4, 4 '' *4, r, ley euramiss.n expires; / 0)3/ 144 4 â‚¬5'l'.t'b, 1 r rueilf.84 4/ 3XC. Re'tiD.*81'fc f'/3 41/, 81 d? .1., iii ti .. 6 ' r 1- f. I Mi ' ': 4'44"4. h Nki 9, *3Â· 4 $ .. EXHIBIT #2 Ms. Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR GORSUCH LTD. TO SUBMIT APPLICATION Dear Ms. Guthrie, The Continental Divide Company is the owner of the property located at 419 East Cooper Avenue in Aspen, also known as Parcel 1 of the Park Place Condominium. We are in the process of entering into a lease with Gorsuch Ltd. to occupy this space. As the owner of the property, we hereby authorize Gorsuch Ltd. to submit a land use application to your office to modify the Cooper Avenue facade of the existing building. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application, please do at the address and telephone number listed below. Sincfely, j 4 0 34- U H#V AN Rbger M*rolt, 1 reasufer The Continental Divide Company 230 South Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-925-7047 .. EXHIBIT #3 Ms. Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: MINOR HPC DEVELOPMENT REVIEWAPPLICATION FOR419EASTCOOPER Dear Ms. Guthrie, I hereby authorize Alan Richman Planning Services and Tom Frye, Architect, to act as our designated representative with respect to the land use application being submitted to your office for 419 East Cooper Avenue. Alan Richman is authorized to submit an application for minor development review for facade modifications to the existing building on the property. Mr. Richman and Mr. Frye are also authorized to represent me in meetings with City staff and the Historic Preservation Committee. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application, please do so through Alan Richman Planning Services, whose address and telephone number are included in the application. Sincerely, ~~such Gorsuch Ltd. 263 East Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 970-476-2294 ME . . e . lili + 11_an EREE 1 - -fiji 1 tEEE EHE 1 .---*r t=== ENE 1 -2 -2 -2 n -Elf' 71 ,---12.1 1 1 1 irjy>jo_p-1-219 6, _JUL 11 VALBRUNA F--7-------------~~1 1 1 1 3 --- --- ---CIr III&El 1 1 lili 1 1 ---- - n-'Who I =04Â«Â®F d ' 1 - - J1-14:~ 11 =42-2-ZINE EXISTING; ENTRY ~- m 2 T LOCATION -3 01 28 11 0 f -9-9*1 I E H 1 i, Cl 6 j oc LL] C 1 1 1 ~ U.1 Eau 1 t.9 -1 E- AL 00 3 55 1 f 1 1 --- 1 McDONOUGH'S 0% 06 8< 11 0Â»8 1 1 -- 9/ P U, Z 1 Â£111 1 1 1 1 Date: 9/4/01 ~ EXISTING SITE PLAN ~PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SLOPNG -- - Drawn: TBF SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DISPLAY WINDOW Job No:01-02 Sheet: LINE OF EXISTING 1 / *0, AUNING ABOVE of 5 Sheets 73Â¤0 , 4 4 - . 1 I:~:,1 Ii:~:,4!!1!lil!..., ~likÂ· 111:1 . :iii 11:1:11111~~ i ~:Ii'~ 1,1,1 1:1: 11:111:1:11. 1 %, 11 O 1 : 7 m : I.1 '~I:li i |||~ liliia: W., 1. 1~L 1.1.1 - ... 14 1,1 6 #lilij; .. - 0 . 41:* 1:111:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:111: 11'111111111'1111:111 !,Ii'ilil,litili!,!t! *mÂ¢~4 3 1 111111111111,111. 11111111111111111 :i:imi:i:m: i C 0 |~~|,~:~d .. i!,!i!,!ilili!.i!.ili.!ilililili!,!i 4666466662 . .. . /1 tili'ilililililitilililil ililix:i~.:i:imi:i: 0 ~Ililliliti:Eililillili:i h~!;'P;!'!;!;14|! :W*W 1: i :i i u :1:4,4,4,4!:!W :m:,4!WPa 1 ilililill'11111'il!111111 @mili k 1 11111!111:1:11'11:111:1: 40Â¥!Wil:d:i m,!:1:1:1:11&!i!: 1 .. 0. D . I .... .1 . - ... . I ... A. . ...De . .1 .... 1 Tilj i 1 i .--- - -~-' - PROPERTY LINE 1 1 // 1434 3~t I 1 17=hs-22===23 28(- I i f VALBRUNA 1 F-=r==r= - Ill 1- 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 - EXISTING; ENTRY 22 -2 - In _1 REPLACED UJ/ A lili 1 1 U ~- - P I DISPLAY UJINDOW 1 1 0 1, 1-1-4.REI A D 1 Â©: 2 - - -- 11]F -a *8 7.9 I Mt 0 -O 1 , // . 1% Uad %10 / 1 ./\ 3 \1 1 1 â‚¬ \ E-Z / c/-9 E 2% 1 1 1 -1 CCY 06 6 < 0 1/02 1 m 1 1 9.3,2./.m GORSUCH LTD. i ( 8 li 11 - im 11 1 1 11 1 , 1.-$ / 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 ' - \ -- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I-- ~PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED NEW ENTRY- Date: 9/4/01 LINE OF PROPOSED Drawn: TBF ~ PROPOSED SITE PLAN AUNING ABOVE Job No:01-02 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Sheet: 3 of 5 Sheets 13(10!NE!}1 AULN) lu # 11 p. 1 -I - 1 -4 lili'\ 11 lili lili lili I- ill i il ill I lip flil 1.31 1 _ 111 lili SH lill' Ilil Â·Iii ill i fli lil . 11 lili lili lili 111 lili Fl 11 1 lili 1 11 / lili 1111 lili lili lili 111 lili lilli _ t._LI L '1 1-JW~2:6-L-1'-9 -12-2.94291Â·+ Â· / 1 .. 7 cmÂ·:1 -Â· A= Ir I.=Cr .CI:e=L I -- RELOCATED ENTRY EXISTING; ENTRY TO BE REPLACED / -ih LINE OF PROPOSED / GLASS AND STAINED OAK PANELS BELOW AUNING ABOVE - ~ COLORADO BUFF SANE)STONE PAYING UJ/ INSET LOGO STAINED OAK DOORS W/ BEVELED GLASS LITES, WOOD RAISED PANELS AND BLACK PAINTED FRAMEUJolei< 1 PROPOSED STREET LEVEL PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 -1.58 1 I 0 -0 PROPOSED AUNING, NA'n- ELLIE, U 2 @ AND UJUITE STRIPES D ke Ed PROPOSED NEUJ ENTRY 04 06 8< OÂ»8 Fg:e , - 01 L-) E- Z & 4,19 9 14'- 1/g" I.il ---- - I'll Co oonlfurng L 5'-31/2" 11'-311/2" 5'-411 30'-0" UNIT 20 /101 (GORSUCH LTD.) UNIT 202 (VALBRUNA) Date: 9 4.01 -- -- GO SUCH LTD. VALBRUNA Drawn: TBF PROPOSED NEW DISPLAY WINDOW Job No:01-02 UJ/ RAISED PANELS BELOW Sheet: 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 4 L SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" of 5 Slieets 73(10!NE[li STEEL AND BRONZE GORSUCH LTD. SIGN AND LOGO SIGNAGE L IGNTING SIGNAGE LIGHTING STEEL AND BRONZE GORSUCH LTD. SIGN AND LOGO GORSUCHLTD. , 94 11 ./ 1 % r COOPER STREET ......4 . "4 I ./'I" .1 EMPORIUM . 91â€¢.UrÂ® 2Â·Â· , 11 4.1 +Mil .Wd ' 1 4..> 30%1 44% . i,> A PROPOSED AUNING, 4 5919 0 :#~,0 1% !.1- lili I NAVY BLUE AND UNITE :Â» , 1.: Â· .Â·r :!PÂ·124 1// /1 , I A 4 3 .Jim:.1 74 '1, '' I I ...... U.INITE STRIPES w 40, 54.y ' '0 ' 1.. 4,1 *1; ., i it]*.3 Â· â‚¬29,1 ./.4 *'ff I ~. 1 , .4.11 I 9%4 2 /11 . 3% 9 Â·: Â· ? %15', 0 10 . /. '/ i . ... Â£ ; U P .}> 2 MIl E-W D '-47 111; Â¥ -1 M M g Ce JLS L.) as M d 4 4 111 //4/ / - 1i il //1/ = BLACK PAINTED 0 Â» 8 2 WOOD SURROUND ,-= - ANC) FRAME - L) E- %0 7 Ld 00 m EXISTING; BRICK KNEE-WALL AT DISPLAY 00 / / WINDOW TO BE REMOVED - 10 4'-0" TAINED OAK DOORS AND SIDELIGWTS EXISTING BRICK WALLS TAINED OAK DOORS AND SIDELIGHTS Date: 9 4.01 UJ/ BEVELED GLASS W/ BEVELED GLASS. DOOR SURROUND 16 Drawn: TBF BLACK PAINTED WOOD VERTICALS AND HORIZONTAL. Job No:01-02 Sheet: 1 SECTION AT PROPOSED ENTRY 9 SECTION AT PROPOSED ENTRY 5 1 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION @ DISPLAY WINDOW SIMILAR Z.~ SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" of 5 Sheets /404 13(low