Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.HP.435 W Main St.HPC9-95
435 9 #p*, ~ 64 - 7<*~6~ L Auberge Final Historic Devt. 2735-124-50-053 HPC9-95 83>x j-fp- 5-7 D.... 1 1 P A .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 04/19/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC9-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-50-053 PROJECT NAME: L'Auberge Final Historic Development Project Address: 435 W. Main St. APPLICANT: ALH Holding Company, Inc. Applicant Address: 435 W. Main St. 925-8297 REPRESENTATIVE: Dave Gibson, Gibson & Reno 925-5968 Representative Address/Phone: 210 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen. CO 81611 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: 39-_ A j MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 435 W. Main Street, L'Auberge- Final DATE: April 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicants request Final approval for a development plan which includes a 206 sq. ft. addition to the existing manager's residence (previously approved by HPC), an 84 sq. ft. addition to the laundry, construction of 12 new guest cabins, and a reconfiguration of the site plan. The proposed F.A.R. is approximately 1/3 of the allowed F.A.R. for the site. The existing cabins were built in the 1950's. Although they have not been listed on the Historic Inventory, they do contribute to the character of the Main Street Historic District and do represent early lodge/ski chalet development. APPLICANTS: ALH Holding Co., represented by Gibson and Reno. LOCATION: 435 W. Main St., Lots A-I, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen. ADDITIONAL COMMISSION REVIEWS: This project has been awarded an allotment in the Growth Management Quota System process. The proposal will also be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments for setback variances. Development Review Standards 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor areas, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: The applicant wishes to expand the number of .. lodge rooms available on the site and has used the existing small cabins as a model for their redevelopment proposal. The intention is to create a small "village" with pedestrian paths that wind through the lodge. The parcel is surrounded by historic resources, with the Christiana lodge to the west, a Queen Anne house and Floradora across the street, and another Queen Anne house to the east. The applicant proposes to retain the existing cabins in their current form and decorative treatment. Previously, the proposed new cabins exhibited some elements of Victorian detailing. These have been removed and the cabins are now very simple, with about five variations in siding and material treatments. Staff still finds that the two level cabins have a somewhat problematic relationship to the street in terms of window height, in addition to the fact that the cabins closest to the street do not have visible entrances, aside from cabin number 11. As discussed at Conceptual, Main Street has become less desirable as a living area due to traffic, however, if HPC is to support a variance to move the cabins close to the sidewalk, they should be concerned that the cabins turn their back to the street in some sense. The architect's intent seems to be to focus on open space interior to the lot. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The architect is exploring options for decreasing the overall amount of paved areas required for parking. A landscape plan has been submitted. The project will make a positive contribution to the character of Main Street, especially in terms of retaining the scale of a small lodge. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development does not detract from the cultural value of a designated historic resource. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No designated historic structures are directly .. affected by this proposal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the development proposal as submitted. 2) Approve the development with conditions to be satisfied for Final HPC consideration. 3) Table the Conceptual Review with conditions. 4) Deny the Conceptual Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant final approval and support the applicant's request for front setback variances at Board of Adjustment with the condition that the cabins closest to Main Street are revised so as to address the street with an entry. Side entries are acceptable if they are emphasized and clearly visible from the street. Additional comments: .LAC4U uon. Arrl.LCATICU ljURM . 4 1) 0 Project MaIne *Ave•RGE · ~ 95 2) Project IDaltion ·+85 W. M.40,4 6'r , ASAN,4 65. Lart A 7»Ru I a gocK 38 (inlicate street 2~lress, lot & block nimber, legal description Miere appropriate) 3) Present Zoning 0 OFF= 4) Int Size 5) Applicant' s Name, Address & Phone # /4 4/4 Mbul Ne a> , 0 425 W· MA,N 91*Eer> ASAZAf, Co, 925,8297 f t<AVF I.AA.,4 4 2TGR~c> 6) ]~~rgesentbti*y~~*3, Address & Phone #lpG/82•ON ¥ AVO /*Cfjocl'9, 915 - 81,4 *0 E #6'/Mx' 1*.202, #tii,%: 925· €57GA 7) Type of Application (please checic 2,3,1, titat aprily): - Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA _ _ Conoeptial Historic Dev. - Special Review - Final SPA -~ Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenl i ne - Conoeptual POD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin - Final POD Historic DemolitiOn nxmtain View Plane Subdivi.sion - Historic Designation Condaniniunization Text/Map An)*ngn-rit -_ CM)S Allotment Iat SplivIot line 42061 e ATY,eviavvie 4 QI]S DRiPti or, Adjustmerrt - \4=tri-4 vice- 901:Blk€·9OnVa-=441'On _ -_ E'heragchrneM+ Lf:,cencd.. 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approodmate sq. ft.; number of bedrocms; ara, previous approv,11 q grant--1 tb the prcperty) . Nlble GUEST CARINS 51497- C-,Do,c_ 9.SIB se\, Pas A 1- ©4. MAN AGE Re' RESI C>ENCE W,TH COVEREEP 84RK j K,6 CrrorAL /7744 5€3:, PLUS LAUNPR« 4 ot:-F Cce (*raL. (17 ·w:-h 6 Ger,vo 757-M- 44 47 9:- ~ 9) Description of Devel.q,nant Application RROPc:SE Tb ADD <206 ep -70 MAKJAGEfe:, REEW (DE,UCE, 84- f:* 7.0 Lk) 14.pa>, AND 102. NE»J QUERTE CAew 45 of 1 1 494*. 9% 3 95347 9: NEW Co,)15rRUCI70Jt Wrll# 6<IkgoR. CA*kagED 10) Have you attached the following? -70 Ep<./977NG (4-5,/46, Response to Attac:hment 2, Minim= Subnission Contents Respcrse to Attadment 3, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachmerrt 4, Review Standards for Your Application 111-1 54) .. April 12, 1995 DAVI D GIBSON. AIA Ms. Amy Amidon AUGUST Historic Preservation Officer RENO, 130 South Galena Street AIA Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Final Development Plan: L'Auberge Lodge SCOTT 435 West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado SMITH, AIA Dear Amy: 9- . i. /2 Please find our final Development Plans for L'Auberge Lodge. A-r--4 11/011!1 4 . The Preliminary Approval granted by H.P.C. on 12/14/94 z-··--··czE-,Nma carried the following conditions, to which we have adjusted the designs as follows: GIBSON · RENO ·AKCHITECTS· 111 1. That cabin unit #22 is removed, and #21 is set back 10 feet from the property line. Response: Cabin #22 is deleted, and cabin 21 is 210 E. HYMAN set back 10 feet from the alley. N° 202 1. That all new construction is differentiated in a very ASPEN positive and hopefully contemporary way from the COLORADO 81611 existing structures. Response: New construction is developed and 303.925.5968 proposed in the following ways: a. Victorian detailing, trim and gable end FACSIMILE treatments have been deleted, allowing 303.925.5993 the forms and volumes to read more prominently. b. Contemporary exterior materials have P.O. BOX 278 been introduced. These included: 117 N. WILLOW 1.) Board and Batten siding N° 2 2.) Corrugated metal siding & roofing TELLURIDE 3.) Plywood and Batten siding COLORADO c. Five different exterior treatments have 81435 been shown for the 12 new cabins, giving greater variety and interest to the overall 303.728.6607 development. FACSIMILE 303.728.6658 .. Amy Amidon L'Auberge Page 2 3. That the detailing of the existing cabins not be significantly altered. Response: The detailing of the existing cabins will remain unchanged. 4. As many parking spaces as possible can be su~faced with grass-crete or a similar porous and non-hard surface. Response: We are presently researching alternate structural paving systems which permit grass to grow and become established in the auto storage areas, including "Checkerblock", "Grasspave 2", "Geoblock", "Grassroads Pavers" and gravel systems. We will utilize such a system in the majority of the auto storage spaces, as shown on the Landscaping Plan. 5. (Amendment to original Motion Conditions) Study the Main Street elevations, especially the 1 1/2 story massing, and looking at opportunities for making a combination building. Response: The 1 1/2 - story massing of the two "E" cabins on the Main Street elevation have been given finish materials which helps to visually moderate their 11/2 - story height: the lower 1/3 of the cabin is clad in vertical corrugated metal siding, while the upper 2/3's is sided with Board and Batten siding, reducing the perceived verticality. A combination building already exists adjacent to the Manager's Residence, and no additional multiple buildings are proposed amidst the existing cabins, due to the larger scale which would intrude upon the historic cabins' context. Amy Amidon L'Auberge Page 3 Finally, the Plan creates a small-scale interior "Village" on the property, complete with a cobblestone "street", walkways and fountain, garden areas, and spa areas. The Main Street elevation is recessive and open and is made possible by the front setback variance, for which we need and would ask your strong recommendation to the Board of Adjustment to permit and urge this variation. In summary, the Development Proposal is consistent with the approved Preliminary Proposal, and has been adjusted and refined to incorporate the five conditions of approval as given above. Respectfully su~p~ted, U N<L David F. Gibson, AIA enclosures .... At ylyONS ~ 3 n.19 ~ - EXTERIOR MATFRIAW FOR CARIN PS, 9'~5 I SIDING CORRUGATED MEMAL 0.,# JA-4 WTE 111„19+ TRIM & FASCIAS 1 X CEDAR C -4 C Kfc. 1/&/ |1| I i1P WINDOWS & DOORS ENAMEL-CLAD. INSULATED co-0. © 1.-21 , ROOFING CORRUGATED METAL /11 BRACKET WORK 2 STEEL TUBE. PAINTED 111 ENTRY ELEVATION jET n lirl,11.*.~r~.1:Ill=ft» fi"DI)''t/+ 1"*1 - M 9 31 ?1 2 011- 1 4-1 lili -'%24 : 4--fn»aw f 11111111111111 LU it,B· -9 71[JL mi 11 1 1-9 4401 >1,0. e i 'llillillillill lIV I ili LU FLOOR PLAN m END ELEVATION END ELEVATION J 13 2 -ri.--1--F-L U 1 f GIBSON·RENO O 10 20 FT. ARCHITECTS 111 710 E IrMAN No 20] A'PENC. OAADO 1111~ ~ 11 ~-J -3- 111111111 ~ 11111111 ~ 111 - 111111111 ~~ 1 1 1 11 f )03,~5;41 FACIMIUE ~0}~13 m) PO BOX 27* 117/ ¥•1~.Ow NO, TELLUMUDE COLORADO .14); l' 1 11'I,11111.1111111, 1 11111,11111 111111.1 1:.1111:VI' I:lill'11111111111111111 30,728 6,07 0~$,MILIE *J) 721 6*30 DIEET,~ SIC)E ELEVATION PROPOSED NEVV COTTAGE ..A" 133EllS NIVM 1SBAA 00980100 'NadSV 241 95 1 32 /1-9, L .. -,. FXTFRIOR MATFRIAIN FOR CARIN "R" SIDING BOARD AND BATIEN. WITH RESAWN TEXTURE ~ r, •0 ~~~- -- 91·50 BATTENS 1 X 2 CEDAR 1 '··· --ill-·4£'fi TRIM & FASCIAS I X CEDAR I ..'' iii ,-i=i, WINDOWS & DOORS CLAD ENAMEL-COATED. INSULTATED ROOFING CEDAR SHAKES BRACKET WORK 4 X 4 FIR -. 1 4--1-1 c - 9--L SinF FL~VATION 8/ K /9 re ./« .,0 0 re-E -tte:,1 6/#ft-31\ In' 1---Pft. F-- <Z t~%ff& -unct------ tR 1 14.4 ///I/**.=11/2 1 1 /,// All - --I « 1 - ------ 7 0,1/0 IF> 1 Elic e LU 1. 2.--moo 3411 7- Ell 00 4 ' 1,U 221 . --1-12- 1 1 *.0.0 4.0 :2 FLOOR PLAN ENTRY ELEVATION Ely¤ ELEVATION '>ttpt- i , 30. N · RENO - 1 1 I r=== : 0 10 20 FT. 1 1 11 d SIC)E ELEVATION PROPOSED NEW COTTAGE "8" 13381S NIV IN 193M 00 80100'NadSV 11Ri 0 0 0 0 3144 REVILION; 1 EXIEELQRMAIERIALS-EQR-CA~iNCIE SIDING PLYWOOD SIDING. Wrril BATTENS £ C' BATTENS 1 X 3 CEDAR „, 19,1 9 0 O'VAW,1 JJ-4 TRIM & FASCIAS 1X CEDAR NTE ' 11-2.·9t C"ECKED GABLE ENDS APPLIED ]X2 DIAGONAL LATTICE c sc.u 14'¢1'.•P BOTIi WAYS »=30/ DOORS & WINDOWS ENAMEL-CLAD. INSULATED ......t © i•_211 ROOFING CORRUGATED METAL BRACKEr WORK 4 X 4 FIR 7. --1 -ZE:~ SIDE ELEVATION L//AE Y\\26 .l 9- f K tr, \ ~<X/9.4-thtl V' \XI Y -'Vuzzh -11111 ' 11 \1~Ime.r.1-~1~%!4~1=11 f•-11 wle -/ Ul .3 m===2== p .'" 92 -ey Y. Al 1 ' H:31 / (31 4 - IL_ 1 1 + ; 00 -4' lan-----.7-- -7- -_-2=9 1 f 0 ./g 1 : 0 1 1 1 It 1 :111 - L--4 1 07-1 be-« - 1 L- 1 1 9 O.t • 4, ENTRY ELEVATION END ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN -21-1/MENT/M7_. E- X---49'iM-- 1 GIBSON· RENO 0 10 20 FT. ARCHITECTS 2101 ,rm,AN No 201 UPEN COLOM.ACKO .1.11 )0) 9]S 5~61 FACI.LIE 30)"$&"1 20 80x 171 117 N WILLOW No} TELLUMJDE COICRADO ~I' 30)728"07 FAC-UE 303 72.66" SHEEW PROPOSED NEVV COTTAGE "C" 49 133!IlS NIVE .LSEIM 9£17 391338nV,1 Oan10-103'NadS¥ ~ .... 3. 4·15 EXTERIOR MATERIAIS FOR rAWN 1~ SIDING BOARD & BATTEN. RESAWN TEXTUZE BATTENS 1 X 2 CEDAR 11:IM & FAS(DIAS IX CEDAR ps, ·91$• WLNDOWS ENAMEL-CLAD, INSULATEl) D.Uve,+ 10&-4 I WE ~~0 #1'04·gt ROOFING CEDAR SHAKES C.JECICH> SCA,& .141"ll~,11 BRACKET WORK 4 X 4 FLR COP'g'T © c'£ 1 111 1 4,4 19A4k 111 i l[ 1 1 \\\\ A..¥,1 'ttill . 1/1/ .N 111 1 Ul i -3 12 -31 1, 17 o,N,YA ZEE* OF --. @ a 9.. 6, r#' Al 8 -:1.2 En \ LI ' 1 1' - 1 /L--2 l 1- - -1 1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN L 1 1 SIDE ELEVATION INO ELEVATION UJ e CC UJ ot K 4, 14 K Vt 25-' _·Clj 11 94 g --1149 -1 1 1 1 .111 l==i -,1 +J _-T L . e I=41./puLair -- h 1 -4 | Ul,=*2=1.h~ . S t==- --- 0 GIBSON·RENO 11 r-- ON ARCH]TECTS 1 1 nof i,yn·wi, "11 )1 ~ in~ • I , ~ I ~ ... zo, j i 1-- - _r' ASPEN coloRAOO L__ -- - - -- -1 'ACWMILIE I I )039233„8 END ELEVATION 30) .SS.3 MO. Box 27' ENTRY ELEVATION UPPtm LEVeL FLOOR PLAN .7 N ./.LOW Ne' TEUUM,DE COLCIRADO >0] 721 .07 1 RAC.·ILIE 0 10 20 FT. 5HEET JP PROPOSED NEW TVVO LEVEL COTTAGE ..¤" 2 133EUS NIVE 1$3# 0 · - 00¥80100'NadSV ~ 2~ 0 0 3·11·99 FXTERIOR MATERIALR FOR CARIN"E" S [DING BOARD & BATTEN, RESAWN TEXTURE WAINSCOT SIDING CORRUGATEDMETAL TRIM & FASCIAS tx CEDAR Pe, .9,11,0 ruw. Ji.4 WINDOWS & DOORS ENAMEL-CLAD. INSULATED 0*rE - 11'25+ c,€CKEO ROOFING CORRUGATED METAL I... 4' BRACKET WORK 2" STEEL TUBE. PAINTED COF,=GHT © 1,-li RAILINGS 2 X FIR. PAINTED - f 4 44! x 42 261/ /fl N~%§\ $4 .MLE O.fl uf 11. b" 1 \\ 23 8,1161 014«,A 1- 7 N 11 0 KE&21 L @ .... f,3, 69 J== r;ili - . i b. - 1 ®EN 2[23. \2 --*.M -i- - F--[l [13- E--ill'I--1~';i - -1 1 1 *-0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill ' 1 L--4 L--; LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 L-_.-___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1 SIDE ELEVATION ENO ELEVATION UJ /4 1 f» 0 5/. 1111 1\4 St K H 14 ¢ 1% /50 111 1 1 -iN - fy- -0 -1 - - ·All- 1% 1 Fr- . -------il# -I.... -U-L€-42 LI_ -1 lilli! - =p -f U Sm *1934-0 ii ~~i---1111111 9~9.Lu .... 1 . . . ON 111®lili m'11111 lilli N GIBSON·RENO lilli lillill - S ARCHITECTS m 3..1¥ ,1 .11,1 11 1 - 11 14 4 - m 1 4 i | ASPENCOLOMADO 11.11 I i ....'60 i I FACSIMILIE 1 1 }0~ ~15 19'1 L -- ENTRY ELEVATION UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN END ELEVATION 20 80X Ve 1, N WILLOW Nol TELLUID€ CCXOMAD'O 0,•15 }0172~6607 FACS,MILI 2/4-P.1 f 0 10 20 FT. SHEIT~ PROPOSED NEVV TVVO LEVEL COTTAGE ..= ,1 13381S NIVE 1SBAA 0 00980100 'NadSV 9838nv,1 4 LMAR,lill . I 0 0 0 0 ...... PLANTING SCHEDULE · NEW TREES & SHRUBS PLANTING SCHEDULE. NEW PERENNIALS 4~5 Denotes existing evergreen to be retained Size EXTRTING TRFF-q. SHRIMS TO RE PROTEr·[ED Cnmmin Name flotantlril Nami #1 Carpathian HArphell Ampanda carpalica 12' Colornrin Rlite SPI,ce PicrA plin,pnt glilica /1 Main,6•n Pink 1-hanthni deltoldes Atmlijolry/li Denota existing Diciduous tree to be retained 10' Colar.In RI,le. Sprnce Pic..a nun,Mns glauca 01 tra™uhill Geranium G,tranitim franrlifinnim 1211,7.1 Pr,r.halai R' rolora,in Rlir. Rpma. Pim p,ing,ni gianca 81 Stinkrop Rriinm sptlit 'Rnilant' 6' Cninri,In Rlite Rprnee prer-8 p'Ing'·M granca #1 Rallnon Flower Plmycorion grandiflora A = ASPEN C~~~I) Denotes existing shrub to be retained 2-2.5"cal Aipen Poplihic trr.muloide., 41 mylity Himprocal!1.1 sp. B = BIRCH 1 1/2-2" cal Airw.n Populn.q Immulnide, 01 1,11 Tri, i,hertra 'Cr.as•r'£ Rmthet CA = CRABAPPLE lilli 2 1/7."cal Rarhant Crahapple Malus Radiant' 441 Int irti ptimila 'Bra,uni CW = COTTONWOOD DATE Denotes # of Stems of Tree for new Plantings 41 Red-Mi, norwood (-nmut ip,·ra 'Raile.v' 01 nwArf Shaita nalay Chryranthe.mum .ip F = FORSYTHIA CHECKED #9 Yellnw twig Dogwoorl Comn, 9,:nrea 'Flacvlramra' 01 Rui,r] Mix hipine t.in[,Intif polyrhyllt,q 'R,iwtl Mix' L = LILAC 5CALE 41 Cien» Plum Pruntlt Distena . 01 filv/,mound Artimisia whmirinana . MA = MOUNTAIN ASH 4-6' RAR Cl,ten) Plum Prunus cistena . 01 lrith Mn.u 9,2,2 quhullata P .PINE 1~ Denotes new shrub plantings COF~RK.T (© i. Pekin f Cntnneafter Coron»litpr aninfolia #1 Forget-me-Not , myntosts S = SPRUCE #1 Frnehelii Spirra Spirea 'Frne.hr.li ~ Denotes lawn areas, sod (seed for minor disturbed areas) 5 gallon Ydlow Flower,ng Curran¢ R ihet Rreum 36. Mil/ho Pin/ P,nus mugn 3 gallon Timmy' hiniper 1,/'pr.nic hon,nnrailie Tamicrrrafr,lin' a R ~ Denotes grass-permeable auto storage area MAIN STREET | .' .· ' ' ' '· .~ Denotes concrete paving 644·'•16 1 p ." 0% ~ Denotes Perennials - --- C -- 0 / -1 00 0 1 ) rn CZEDP 242~Tk--EL__- 1 c 0 .13 1 .TWINS- (3 o..IC. ~~15 1 ,0 - - 1 1 ~-'~~'-- ..ff, I 7 18 la \ 7 ~ V - 15 1 4- 10 r-rn 7- *3 r® 2 MANAamme' L Foug,Ir.10*B. FC€~1 BFURiPX!2=2 AISIDINCI (03 01 0 19 L.~4 1 ":474 'I Si,4 1// 1 0"filli~ 10¢' ~9~ ~ M m'.47 44 111 0. 10 - 12 r. 1' 0. r 0 -4.7 0 L--- ~U *0@ < 13 12 0. jple..0 0 J I 17 12/4 4 0. 0. ..., . :>41 X 9 8 . LAUNDRY 4 -gn-1 0 "COBBLESTONE STRIET" CND . 4 f.*£22& .%....... -1>XI , , EMPLOYEE No 20 HOUSING 1 - 2 - UNIT GIBSON · REN 3 4 ARCHITECTS 111 2,01 MYMAN a. 0. 1 0. m. A&PENCOLORADO 0 10000 - 1 1 ....1 N•W STRIm T 1.10•47 81. I1 M, O ALLEY BLOCK 38 ..CYCL. TRA'h FACSIMLIE M 925.5991 NOTES: 1. Two large Scoich Pines are to be relocated only by a liscensed tree t POD BOX 271 117 N WILLOW mover with adequate equipment. Min. root ball size to be 8' dia., f Noz TE.LU'DE COLOUS. each tree. 2. Provide #ee guards at base of all crabapples. LANDSCAPING PLAN 814/ ,0, ni.0,07 3. Provide 6" topsoil, all disturbed areas to be sodded. FACIMILIE 4. Seed mix to be Canadian Bluegrass and Rye Grass mix, for 1. 1 0,-O. disturbed areas 303 728*651 5. Fescue sod lawn to be applied throughout site, typical,as shown. SHEET# 6. Irrigation Notes: a. Seed mix areas and sol areas to have permanent irrigation with rotary spray heads. b. All new trees to be supplied with drip irrigation at base of tree. o. All perennial bed; to be equipped with "bubbler' type 0 0 0 11. Pfv~KONS 3./1 • 99 -/ 4 1 . k, 2 9434 f ~L *2= AS FAA," N Adtn 4 4..4 4,% 04- AN a M. f'/7./.4 W-111 11 'kme•mizz,ct.,fL: 1, 9, /141//0/Zhwl .LIL bil In <}ECKE> I'Dessa /1 14 " sou Zo, 6 / ' f - CO-GHT © . 5,1 '-4-EiL - .A. -r .A. NORTH ELEVATION SL·2~ EZ~~ 7 f-- - - 1 . . r---- - n 5 1 6 EAST ELEVATION i~€7 ill m 0 , 4, /> .A 1- U) Z Ul 20 7 .... 4.34 A . ad 0 £ 4 n ~ 5 9« A »E 4 LEJUE /7 NX . A /NLE jan 1 40 11 5 % 1111*lilli ~-,~Be~r Iltd /*[liN[~1~011~ - _. . 1 Tr--rl~pAULU.LL~414-U-4.---IUULU~-1 »U/.4.-4 . - - 11111011111~11Blli~__ .A" "8• > SOUTH ELEVATION GIBSON·RET ARCHITECTS 1 1 111 10 25 50 FT. 2,OE, HYM,4,4 A.ENCOLO'/Do No 202 A161, M-W , *3 ~03'2S.... FAC.-/ .4 303~233~93 11~ I WILLOW N.2 $ .'m 0 1 Ta.UJRUDE COLORADO . *.~21~07 ,eMIT-*til· ' W '0UE ]03 7218431 1 M 11 I lilli 9€ET' ~ : :: : : :; :~imi-ifijjii-jic i~Cuiitil LE4Wlatm®lillii j j~~ im i ~fii i-@il WEST ELEVATION A/B' uNIT- C»45•65 "A' Moof a.44 Wr™ ·3- m..711*.w< 71<IRIM-rr. PROPOSED NEW ELEVATIONS OOVEI .... LEGEND AND NOTES O FOOID SURVEY MONUINT AS DESCRIBED 0 UTILITY POLE fw•HOLE ¤ STREET LIGHT 1--10 10 20 a SURVEY CONTROL 1 CONTOURS DECIOUOUS TREE MAIN STREET SNOI ON OROUND IT TIME IF TOPO SURVEY 1/95 M 00 ~~ CITY MON~ENT - CONIFER TREE O UTILITY BOX CURB AND GUTTER / /1. 1 -1 · CONC- WALK 1/ 7908 -.... »0~ - _ _larr,%:dil/Ti 49, $,IKE . 75.00.11 W /2„..1 1 to A \ 5,96 --/ 1 1 \ /1 29 4 OFFICE 200 .5 14.2 5.7 1-5 ' \ , STONE WALL N\ OD N I. CABIN 10 .- 5 CABIN 91 N > 9 6 8 3~ #Mb 8 0 <4* GRAVE DRIVE 2.2 9,6 12 I O $ k - -0 - LOT 2 14.2 8 8 8 54 - 12 .1 3 €4 . 1 09 11 $ 15.8 j e s CABIN 9 0 , E. 8 0 - 1 f 0 T Z e Z e i ' e 0 14*e 1- 11 .04 0 - i 14 2 O \ 1 1 ,\ ~CABIN *' CABIN CABI ~ 1~1 I L %4.1 CONC. VAL 31.7 \ * 12.1 1 12.1 12.1 12.1 to - LOT wIll. 5 2 ~j .5 3 f ·' €4 CAB INN - CAB IN {N\ CABIN. CAB IN -1 - CABIN L_-_J 7 \0 N .L 54«; 1 ~ 45 -431 4'i 7 7.1 ENCROACHES BUILDING - 0 . MECH. r 34 - \ - -~ „,4 1791-n GAS U 12 5 14.1 14.1 \0 Ill 1•0 12.1 12.1 12.1 125 v'· U 50 W f 901, ,-0 0 1 7 PAVEMENT ORAVEL I - < -0.0 1 1 ALLEY BLOCK 38 0 0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY f LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 AND 2, PERKINS SUIDI¥:SION, BLOCK 38, CITY /40 TO-SITE OF *SPEN, PITKIN COUNT¥ COLORADO. CONTAINING 0.820 ACRES CERTIFICATION 1, JO- HOWORTH HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT Ill PREPARED FROM Flsis A SUR~ET.;rer:tz:: m,:UU:Il:.T°.1;~m PREPARED BY S IONED ™1 ilL_DAY oF: .JA~k..*~1_, 1 995. , ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. J0011110-™ /+1' 25047 U 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 SITE SURVEY PHONE/FAX (303) 925-3816 DATE JOB 1 1/95 !20340 FOURTH STREET 133U1S 4TH STREET ,/» ---- 1 r. 7.- 7.. 7 . -plf ILD " 1.- - - #t t- + / ~ 11 1+ . m -- ORIVe 1 1 -" - --- i \ L_L_L-] ~ r~E*1-17 . m IF m L ---- 0 6 2 2 . r - -3 4 W.----lf « W -------1 m m 4 r - -1 0 10- 01 E-- -7 -----11 [ 01 0- -- I I MI m - 1 164 .7 4 -- 'Ff -F- ~ ~ - 1 : F--~r- . J 1 1 :1 1-4 0 1 8 1 1 --- 4 1 1-1 Ir-1 i m -3 100.00 f t. ri 3AD STREET 0 3 L:AUBERGE 1 11111 i Q z N 01., C 1 1~ '44! ' ill!:,1 32£72*i. 435 WEST MAIN STREET 6 1 ,2 - . ' 4%,1 ASPEN, COLORADO li BE )tools Aeitv NV-Id 8007=1 9NliSIXB 1 1 ..h . 0 ~ e .>I «fi~ %-2 0- ~ \ e Co b Nighthawk Or 0315'er I. p \<2*& : n a ) 4 -°*x. 10-~~7 44~ ~~: ~ h\19 4. 1 9 9 «4 92 ~w Dr ~62 - - 020 94<1 04, 0 -9 0 fe faeo $ 1 0. e L__ SnOM' d %9¢ ; 056 -7 0490 0690 Rd 9 4 Pl 0 +4~ Isnowlsunny D 01 »40 To Basalt Go sie~fl ~ -4 9. *09 04& >d Salvation » 4. € 4,50 f Aspen %46, 1 rt 0 o\ Institute - - ~ Hunter v *91 a < 8980~263 5/ \01 f - CporK p < 'r El . .1\ 1'4 10 Music 0/2/ 70 5 2 Tent /02*ood Duck Ln 9- u. e W / 0 6 Gillespie St~ 1 , 1 0 Pe rl Ct Golf Course 0 0 'th t 9 1: ~4&%4~ 55 F sm# Fi 4 1 t ..4 vine St P ncls st Sm 1 €--- 1 W.>1% 0 4 1 4 e 0 * # 3 H„a 0 01 Race 7 / \ 0- 9- n7 St 67 0- 1 2-- Maroon ~eek Rd «--, m Grt .- / *e St 44 \ 5 out A v q# ~/ /G G. , i \ 9 1 1 al" St 0 04, ays, Q,6.44 Sawmill '. pk '45,0. \ ranci %022+ 0 9 C \ 0 . O I O .O 16(:1 f , l ' \ b e <11> 1 5 VS I E 4 6~ a,% e Pk 82 - a € co 2 2 primrose Path 'b 2 -c,Hospx % 1 0 912 / t<,- ''~ *'4 L t <i> C i m %1, /\* \ H .0 . Uggler Mtn Ad / , C 04 - 0 0 4 -ok s 0 COL 8 ent St Maroon Lake· . 11 - - 4- ~44674 ~ a . Sdr fels S ./ e Jua mr * Per .0 ~ Dale m P 6?-n \.,Grb, 0 0, 0 , 1 \ 6 e 69 po" 60 4~ ck Mall C 9 32 ¢ 0'>" ~~Larkspur £0 Summet St ' .0 2 De n St b \14 f * 78 c'/ 2' Gl rt na Duran C 00 4, . 2 4 4 fl / 0 U C- 1.4-4- 4 L. -4 44*As Grove (D 1 AS /OU# -4 6 4,0 /ps Pl R O Westvjew 2 X /49 1, Ute pt (,- * 1 'b» 44, 49'bod,4* Dr Crys al *a Ad _ Stittv,B 9%5 82 0 44 %0 r VICINITY MAP To Twin Lakes, Independence Pass 4 Red Mountain Rd Holden Dr JS Foruds - Q Laurel Dr Loppe of Loure ... 5.'U_ 4.- ' ' .¢551 I Apkh&1 Il ~«3*"t 0-1 -1 -~r 1 ,*m~=6•68*- r 7 -r-I-r,- 7-4 V 00 12-'.0;»-PA 1 ! EAST NORTH { 1 ! 1 1 . Pr 1 t J Ul I . m SOUTH 0 N 1 1 5/ 'Lilci -393.8>ht , 1 ~ Pil 029 1 6- -1 I GIBSON.REN •:' H:TFC'% 111 ~10€ -¥,9~N •-0 202 FLOOR PLAN •01/8 %./. D'le¢ U 'i' 11 f':Ili,7 .;I':i N 101'i. ~* *p L i a f '11 r B 1 i Il i f: p :-i 7 1'1-1-7-1-77-1 0 10 20 FT, *1 *,-4 IIi ·1'N ...L<» 1.1- u.-46-2 94-- .O 80• „. Il g i fro# ii "# U . 1 1 „0, TYPICAL COTTAGE (#21 .1./ DO, I.-O, .<$..... WEST EXISTING PLAN and ELEVATIONS 133W1S NIVM 1S3M 00¥130100 'N3dSV I i Lti >Wh * . 4 - 31 j . gm.,6 11:! i~ •:.L.£•:c: 22~- -E .1 1 .1 2,= 0 . 4 t I 1 {53* 1 EE i ·· .....V.,4..4. ,„; - i ZIN .0.7 4 4 '11 %ON ·i· ~ 'Mili~K '' -- I.. 1 =4 -~ R = iE!#ITA, ;i= 5111" :22 . 7&7# EE 1 94·it'k•¥· '.V' ' •11'110-K i\:My 1,0 11:1,11,69,1111,11, E~-- F•'l'•~'t.Ilm „ , 1, 1 1&44'?"ti,r..0 ~ 14 ,*'411,14/ ... iE E- = 49·...; - .--~4...- -81!11•E -":11 fl ,#hevi '' 4 . 1 . =lilli= ... g: - -17 =91 0.*1," ,#'ii ,, 311 m.':i ::: 1=- 1-::1=ililli,h'39,1 6 44 ..t 1=2=1=4,1,1491,11 , . 0 '21= - mal 0 1==2. , 1-11. , 1 1 . r .I •L . 0:i' 1. ."1.1 . .. . . 4, I . .. .. 44 4 TYPICAL CABIN '1%6 ELEVATIONS 4/ I f 44 44-11141 ./ ./ 4 441-*/41 , L 4 1 4 3 1 *5*V , 7 3 It I: - 1 I - --- * 4:. 1 Al 1 * . t. - 4, k 3.1. , -+~•11 % .I./. . 4 k . */L # I./.441:# 4, n . I - C Ifick# :,I '. fv,j ' 0~ & . LX -19 , £ 1». *, .€'10/6 : 4 4 44 $ .02..........tu fi:y =.pwt~-rf:174, I. 4 7'P»'473,9 7.=1: L' 1.-9:'. 1 .1 ,. · ~ 6.4%.11 94 1% . 1 4*, i:Ty:.11-1.14'f.~f· TE f - - E.1*4*-3-,-0 132~ -~ ~ L ·. ecid=# %© I . 1 - 2 " I. 0 - 3 J , 22. .. i / 1 % - e : + LA#4 + » 1 32»· - ---44*63 '·-19 I . ~ 4 4 .11!1 : · i r:·42 1 . ·4 ./1/&~.6/frt# ji<:i 1¥~ ,¥©V>·4§ , , -- I ---- t.2 $.0/41!. 47/4/2~*K b ./r |1||04, 4, i 1/"-1 7 ip·'1! 1 , 5 ¢,2.. I i 2 #*1£- tr,---0 7-- -ix,T Till ~ l. . 1 2 : .1... . *1*lit~i - i f '' . 1. , Ill 42~-4-- - 1 - - -3 ¥44 4. CABIN VIEWS . -1, .2. L'AUSERGE - All/* 4.4 :#flie#"li.# :. 1 4. i ..~ . Im:1 1.4/1.Al,16.. 11.. ¥,1.1,MA m:@rr T.'Ul: fli....../15+ 7-22==- -:r-- -11..1,!IN,1:1921.1.?Ii..J|~~|~~~ - 8p--1 .1 1 6.1 9 + .. t.> 1 €¥42... flir' t. t . ti,7 -11 .-51 4 4 11... W 03.1 -- - . .4'.·, . r ··,i =-,-_.1.,14'~ .P,Efi = .. 11,9 ' 3 + 4 7. 4 4 11 1 1 44 ·' 4 ...74 61%1.,14. ".*4 . 4/1 11 1 /= - 4 14 t,-11 jal . i,:{ 4 : 44 , r# I 1.1 1 +4 .* I .4.1 T ' it JI 4 k *449 -· 1, R <. 1.6 4 I z_, - :611*t~ P:J K ..d. ~ . 14 + : . . y 0- tw'.*.*.lut i / .··le<.EA-$4 4,#~t - · 94~ - i.'i f ·;·tatat 1 ~ 1 .11.,111 1 . 1. .. 1 1 + 1.T,11 1 1111.1 11 11. 4 - 6 1 :PU..2..1*#.69., t . „ , 4 .I .. . 161.~1 :1 11:11 4 1& 1 1 ·· I . .. 2 1411. 1 1 , t'14 1 4 ... 1. : C - W e g .4. ........1 1 . h 1 + . 1 4„ 2 1 . -1.1 1 1.1.4 .1 - *j -* d. 4 -- It r * ' I I . ... + 1 11 -1.24.1... -1-..'IT.. 1, 9/,4.- 1 -1 . . 1 1-- 1 .. 419 f 1 1.i . 41 1 . . . . I 11 . A-ritf~kIE,~7'Tk"A¥ T.¢1~·~' ~~ l · F~#11..~1.Ir~ · ~· ·' . ' ' 1.11 1 1 - P 1 ~Lp'1& 31~4'7'7$12'. ··4#.#14- ' -.. -4 ~ ~_. ' 'tl - A · 3 ./ . : k.' . 11!411-1-101 . : 111 - . . .1 .1. u '~44 1 · ~!1 5 hil .-. 1 ':11.lili...FIE!1...?¥%4.'4'. · · .*~..,i·~·~~My~#~M8&2%$'4 1 ·i'~ik A . lili . .i *11. :-1 - ~1-Ii:£·e:k- 1 - ..:. 4 CABIN 1:.1,1.1.411% DETAILS 4. 1 .1 - I . . ... 6 6 ./.1,1 I. el 'ill C 1:**JE.* et V 1.11 ··lili , 11 - F Ii.· 1 : 1~11... :311 1 ...11. :. 1 ,. j. liliT .1 . . . I U. 1 lie.* 0... ' 11 . F 1--- I 2<~ 7 t . *>4.5~.: 1 li 1 1 ~4 11.'L .~ . -r ..~... 1 Mt 14 M t ¢TI,*t U ,~3 91· .. 1 1 1 ... _. *4, me.* . 13 ILLJ- a. e,wi 711'..+4,1, ··.2'cr 1- I i...432% 1. riT ... 7 1%1.4 ·:'9€ -'f 11 144 f..4.14%'lit.5.La¢.J - 1 .. 4%.lf,4=...131:43 - r 1. 11 ' T.1 C 4 ' i '---0 .1 ... ............ l 1: ~ 1 1 . ..36 Q.li L'AUSERGE 435 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO I >€*b.. 27. 109 I 44{ .~23 3 40,1¥t <#11"<1.1 . Ak>r:4.0.itizillm~10# 1 ./ I 9.- . 0.4. 1 Ne <*, 2. 1 ,14,0 i·t,41,3~,<~ ATITW- 4, 2 » /437 - . I I . 41 -r· i d. w 'e· . 1 4. ' V '/--A V . 121: , , i.0,3, 3 1 . 3 14 R ~: , m! ..... -.... -r.0.-I ./# + *il i i 4* · · 1 .. 4 1 ... '41 r - ./** I & r 49 ./ 4 L n * 4 4 1 - '>4 4 . + A.'44 1 #- · L.1 - 11&7 40 ' /. '44/$ - 1* 117 4*. 4 11* 1 '-+ M ·~ j1#2livE * 0 1; me *'ti'(1-~ill, 6 milj),46 ; 1 6 I I , 1 4-r: : „.Ji - I JV=C' ImEE i v Im-*IWI ..... r' *61 +9' 1 1114-1 ..1 . I. , I -2-9 *fle 11,7-1% .0. 4- t -- - Em=t : b k; r.¥ -7 ilip' r -I'll 1 1 1 1 46. : I--1 b 21 1 .7,1 /. .:. :1 . tr*, 4144&1 4** =1~- . k 1.- r-11: 1 1- , 4 . - 2 . '14.f 1 -€ m JA 14. . {TII I .01 ~11141!11#,1 ** 1 I *1 "~ 32.91 7 b * J. 11 141 2.1 B' 7 0 P. I 2 . I 1 11*atti 4 'tr,=al 1111 . ~ ~i~ ~r=..2,116== 114.,~~ 1 >,4 . / 94. 4 1 •·.. *| I. ...I--Illi./PI'l.'Illli - r i .1, - - I ... :zr.4/Z 04*44{14 ,=1_ 4 ..•~ Cr ¥111.'.Imi~~-14 -1, !!La ~ ,#.. ~ 4; . f - *04/.2-111-, 6,11: r I_J~~ f.. imp . ·...1 1 . . 1 - 1!Ii'.2-1'7-'··i *'·Di,61+ .1 1.-,1 \(l < 4.7 1 . 4Al' '. 1. 42"' 12 1 . . 4... ~ I .4/ . e. %» '»%*4. 4 44 1.1.» ..L-1 @IF '4 '/8 ./43 a . 4 4 I -4 p ..0,4,04 S' 1» · · lilli, i : > '* '4&· >316.t .%.1 A t' 43*t ... 0 2 . b .1 .221..3.%. . 1 h ·. r.,A 0- + f / 10 .-·-0--r . I - I. 11 1 . 1 094 L + 4 · . · 1 '44~ . . 1:11 - 1 1~1.1.1 **u'lu~.lilli.. 1 . :1 1!11. 1 1. 1 I. I 0 2 1. h.s.1, · h W . , a . - I it . 1.11 r PEDESTRIAN 1. b. . , ....~. 2,¥16.12,23'.-t: % 34.1 ~ 1%, , -·r ** 4 * ' 4 ® :' * ia AA-Ar~8811 . r... ... 1.. A I . I AMENITIES I. I "~~,1 4.' m)441#A~ $96 &4Mul,4 - %: 4- 1:,55, 'AN Red A 1 - 1 - I Tr ' a. 1 11 1 1- 1 11 1 - Ill - ft . alit"me. 9/El'EA'ill# 'tEEE~pij<§·2~ I~.i '4.;®i., rry»,-·..c,~ -~~'P,t tGXKtt/j'%~6ill~%2£~Er841 E.1, - ... 1 h. 1 1. I 4% hi : 1 ' 1 1 00... .f ..... fl... t~ .... ~.. Elk ~ f .. ..fir: I. h ..1 ..-I £/* foll ·. ' 1.0 E ...~ r 1 % I I . , , '1& 1 ./- 4 f I :f ' 2 . . 2.2 , ve./. 4.4< # :&401; *3? 4* : U .1 4 + , C 1 - 1 -4.-0. .44 4 -1 1 14*66% i I 1 , . A . 1 . 11 '.4 2. i . t: . ..% %4 1/ \U : ' ~' 6 4 .4 - n -1 .. . 1 1 < d I. L . -11 I. 'm -F= .L... 'I , .4 -1 4 ~1 ~:2 1: 1 ~1 .. U 4...© -kt -=ha- I.- 1- . CAUBERGE 435 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO . 0 . 0 . - 108' 9/54 0.,-4 AN B CrE le· 115 17 C~CKED MAIN STREET 4<JAL€ WO ''. 1 ' COP™GHT © 1._14 BU' Stog WATIACOURIi i .1«-1--1.4 -. ! 1 lili'11111'lilli 1 .1 , 1 11 Offlo• 1,.. 1 \ 17 -1 . L. , E - L. 111111.1.-61 11 P . L_11 1111111111111 !.i· 1 12...111Eli Ill 1 f 41 1. 1. 1. 1 . 1 ... . 1 ..1 1 ~ MANAE.ill.s~ 1 . 1.Ell -: ---L®WIBI@[1]141 R.SID."Id. 5 1 1 y~·rn·p-..·/.--~--.2.· , ... . ~.. ...~....~~ - . ~.~ i 4--c ... 1 1111//111 1 1. ./.-8 . 1-1. · - 1 In- 1. 1- 04 . 1 ' , . 1 1111111111 11 - . I . 1 . 1-1-....1]lilli 1, I , / 1 .4 . 111 - .lkil -r:-,3 .·1 111 13 1 10 le - 1 6- -, 1 J m .... I -t·>/~' le e B . f 1 1 - - ~111'THI - g &9 2 1 1 "INTIRIOR ITRIIT" L_L_-J - 09 I ~~,.:920*Wl\¥ ' Ul m .. 1 .. 0 0 7 ilil . 0 ~~ ~ 99 ~ L_-BpCYCLa .r.A. eTR..T *kill 0 Elli 11 9 lilril *-1 9 3 41 1 8 1 01 0 N.W LIGHT GIBSON·REA IRCHITEC T, Ill lie /77•Wd No 202 ASPEN COt.ORADO .1.11 Alliy Blook 38 )03.98$968 '92$5„3 6,€5-LE PO.BOX]" /7/ WILLO. PROPOSED SITE PLAN ... Nel TELLUMIDE COLORADO *72.6.0, KIMIUE 1 W..64 0 10 25 4 FT, SMEET# "A/m" Nerri· UNfr A PU,OK PLAN 15 COMa,4/0 ban' u/,r D. .rre/foR- 5 CAB,+45 1,0 711*21 11 AKE NEW' . 133B.LS NIVVY .LSEM · .La=WAS a 980100'NadSV ~ .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 26, 1995 Meeting was called to order by chairman Donnelley Erdman with Jake Vickery, Roger Moyer, Linda Smisek and Sven Alstrom present. Excused were Les Holst, Martha Madsen, Susan Dodington, Melanie Roschko and Jeff McMenimen. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the minutes of April 3, 1995; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Sven moved to add Ajax Mtn. Bldg. air conditioner to the agenda; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS Amy: P&Z approved Aspen Physics plan B reduced by 20 feet in length. Sven: I like the long building but not at the end of Gilespie. 435 W. MAIN STREET - L'AUBERGE - FINAL Amy: This project has received its GMQS allotment and they can proceed with the project. They have responded to the conditions set at conceptual. They are requesting support to go to Board of Adjustments for their front setback variances along Main Street. Some of the cabins will be 1 1/2 feet from the lot line. That being the case I feel those cabins need to address the street a little bit differently than they do now. The conditions from : conceptual were that one of the cabins should be removed and that has been done. All new construction be differentiated in a positive and contemporary way than the existing structures. Detailing of the existing cabins not be significantly altered. As many parking spaces should be surfaced with grass-crete or a i similar porus surface not a hard surface. That they study the Main Street elevations especially the.1 1/2 story massing and look a opportunities for making a combination building. That has not been < done and they give reasons in their application. Dave Gibson, Architect for Gibson & Reno: The vegetation is a major element in this project. Along Main Street we have the concern of how it fronts and how severe the elevations are. I have been trying to engender and to magnify a soft edge to this development. One of the ways we get this is through the recessive spaces that go back through the buildings and we have also removed some of the fencing and substituting hedges. There are several trees that will remain and,we will add cottonwoods and aspen trees along the street to create a canopy. There is a layer of vegetation between thei. curb line and the buildings. The existing buildings are wood and shakes and board and batten. Our new cabins are a slightly larger volumes and we are finishing them in wood and corrugated metal. We want a progression within the complex. The materials change as well as the forms. .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 26,1995 Jake: What about the wall surface material? Dave Gibson; We have broken them down so that you can read the volume, fenestration and the roof forms. There Will be no ornamentation. There are three wood treatments, one board and i batten at 12 inches and one has two feet and there is a combination metal/wood. We want to retain intimate courtyard spaces. We have created an architectural front that addresses the street architecturally but that the actual opening of the units really needs to orient inward and that is both for function, noise and dust. Main Street is not a hospitable environment. Some cabins enter off the sidewalk and some enter from the side. Donnelley: Cabin 16 and 11 enter from the side. Jake: On cabin 16 and 11 there are parking spaces that are indicated as grassy areas. Are you using grass-crete? Dave: We are looking at grass-crete, grass-block, grass pavers and we are pricing them right now. Jake: From & streetscape perspective we are trying to get the cars out of the front yard and in both of the those locations including #9 the cars are pulled right up to the property line. I do not trust the grass-crete. Dave: It is working on this project as there is roadbase that has been hardened over the years and has successfully revegitated. Those areas would remain. Jake: I am talking about the actual placement of the car. Was there any study about off-centering the buildings and I am having a hard time supporting the frontyard setback. The interior spaces are less valuable to me than having that space out at the street edge. Sven: I am concerned about the numerous cars also and I feel there is a pedestrian visual density. I do feel the project fits Main Street and cries out to be completed but I am a little concerned about the visual density. Donnelley: Yes, the cars are not shown on the model. How many parking spaces do you have? Gideon Kaufman: This is an old fashioned motor court and it offers people who come to town with bicycles on their cars etc. the ability to drive right next to the cabin. If that doesn't occur what they are trying to do will not work. 2 .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 26,1995 Jake: Part of the motion was to look at the Main Street elevation. Donnelley: Cabin 11 and 17 have a fence in front of them the height of the car for a screening element. Dave Gibson: Cabin #9 has a dense hedge of pines. Today there is zero screening for any of these and in the new plan you either had a fence or hedge for screening the parking so it will have less of an impact. Gideon: There are three curb cuts that currently exist and it will be landscaped and you access off the alley. That was a requirement of engineering. Roger: Did you look at introducing one or two doors along Main Street rather than a window? Dave: It was partly to reduce the noise from Main Street and typically the bathroom is where the windows are so that you have an additional buffer from the sound. Gideon: My only question is whether you want too much density and will it stand out. What does the board recommend. Donnelley: The size of the trees and spacing can be indicated here to a certain extent and worked out at construction. An even grain should be maintained. If you make it self conscious then you are trying to hard tie the architecture and the architecture is making a subtle statement about this being the central portion of the project through the massing and higher eave height and chimneys. If you try and play other games with vegetation it might .not come out as well. Roger: I would approve the project and I see it as a motor court and I feel we need Jeff's input on landscaping and I feel there needs to be a well defined path from the entry of the cottages to the Main Street sidewalk and that you don't have a large tree blocking that. I like the feeling of a village within a village. Dave: I like that idea and can incorporate it. 1 Donnelley: This is a complex of structures in a very small scale and I feel that the entrances should stay more directed toward the interior. Jake: On cottage A the all metal design, does the metal go straight to the ground? Dave: It would stop short of the concrete. We are using corrugated metal untreated and it would also be on the roof. 3 .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 26,1995 MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant final approval and support the applicants request for front setback variances at the Board of Adjustment; second by Jake. Motion dies for lack of vote. DISCUSSION Jake: I would separate the motion into two motions. Sven: I would like an amendment on the landscaping. MOTION: Jake moved that HPC grant final approval for 435 W. Main Street; second by Sven. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC send a letter to the Board of Adjustment supporting the applicants request for setback variances at 435 W. Main Street for the following reasons: 1) To develop the architectural feel of a village within a village. 2) To allow less large massing and thus maintain the feeling of small scale and space between each unit. 3) And it continues a setback pattern that already exists on much of Main Street. 4) As an historical perspective there was a front and rear variance granted in 1959 by the board. second by Jake. DISCUSSION Jake: The space that is being gained by the variance I do not feel is being utilized. I am also looking at the impact on the pedestrian as he walks down Main Street. For example if you moved the two little cottages forward and moved the entries so that they faced the little street going through then there starts to be an exchange in the public realm in theory. Roger: There are benches at the bus stop at that location. Gideon: There is a pedestrian feeling already there as you have 20 feet between the street and the property line. Sven: I support the variances because I feel it is a good solution in dealing with the entire block. I feel the density of the cars and cottages 13 and 14 fills the site in too much so I would not I have approved conceptual. ' j VOTE: Motion carries 4-1. Jake opposed. 4