Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.506 E Main St.HPC50-02145£: 14 P (1 ~2 - 0-1 - 506 E. Main - Pitkin County Courthouse 2737-073-23-001 9,?it H E- b AN..4 1 V ~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET ~ City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 10/19/92 CASE NUMBER: HPC50-02 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-23-001 PROJECT NAME: Pitkin County Courthouse Extension Request Project Address: 506 E. Main Street APPLICANT: Board of County Commissioners Applicant Address: 530 E. Main St. REPRESENTATIVE: Tom Newland, Deputy Director of Public Works Representative Address/Phone: 530 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 920-5209 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: il- 12,9(4-* P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: ATI ~ Everl~~Ef Aging Technologies Inc. 420 Fairman Road The Disappearing Lift"™ P.O. Box 12232 Lexington, KY. 40581-2232 F. W. Kephart Regional Sales Manager 41 L.LE G> . Phone: (606) 231-1738 Fax: (606) 255-7935 Lk= 4- Er 1 i i< ><- 53 i i; 1 1 ~ -21 ) -0 \ l. ' J ~ cly Ft- ~~42(217 .. ATI Aging Technologies Inc. 420 Fairman Road P.O. Box 12232 Lexington, KY. 40581-2232 (606) 231-1738 FAX (606) 255-7935 Linda L. E. Smisek P. 0. Box 8232 Aspen, CO 81612 Dear Ms. Smisek: We are writing to express our appreciation for the time you spent visiting our "Disappearing Lift" exhibit at the recent ReHABITAT show in Miami. As long as there have been staircases, there have been building owners, architects and especially those with limited mobility, struggling with the legal, moral, financial and technical challenges of providing handicapped accessibility. With the passage of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) public awareness of this problem is at an all-time high. We are sure that you as a preservationist have realized the added challenge of protecting history while at the same time providing equal access to all. The EVERHARD LIFT was designed with this very challenge in mind and has been used successfully in projects such as the Shaker Village at Pleasant Hill and the Lt. Governor's Mansion in Kentucky, Conner Prairie Pioneer Settlement in Indiana, NIKE Governmental Affairs Building in Washington, D. C., and the Franklin Life Insurance Headquarters Building in Springfield, IL. ATI has a network of professional lift contractors across the U.S.A. Our team of experts stands ready to assist you in minimizing the impact of providing handicapped access to the historic structures for which you are responsible. Again, thank you for your time. gil- ..4:k« Alan Mellinger Operations Manager ARM/bk Eve•6i LIFT "The Disappearing Lift" .. 'Eh '' 4.-4.-1 /3 .= '~t?2 €91 16* Ever lai 2 7 A:.i • 44,9 I - L . 6 1/11 -TM ag 1 .'C I 1 ... 1 7 i .. . '1 - ... If f. *Ir 1, f I . -4.2.4. 4."W # be. · . "... .........i.ii i f 4 ATI W - 4 ~ .~ i .. I .... ... PO. Box 12232 * ir'FrerifIT- 1.1 420 Fairman Road - .1 - - 1 . .. '04»# */4·- y.· ' i.120 . Lexington, KY 40581-2232 . r- -La:Ja/2/& -I:i.:.----A:- I 1 . 1 *i-:-&<37*-evt'Meg,grvr;~ !~~1"~i? · I i 1 - , ... LL / - .... -·.-/:, I Le£ r/Y , fi. L£f)~fg ~11&9/:4132.1.1~il=· - £'n WAI-- .06 1&099-~ I k /- . . I I y - . -. 1 -il'71 , 5 .' .- 0 . 1 1:4 6 :. ... : - 4 .... ., : .., .. I & 11 1 . 4 . I .. . . .1 . .. 0 4. W 6 1- .:.. . . .. h I'~U I*, ~ l~·~.:~~~TUT74~~719:77 : I#.-ix. . I : . 0 : -I-/*i*...1:...6", b'' 4 f? 1 - $• 0 ' er----r' 11 j I: .'M•A21;4>11.......~: ' 0 ' #- $ : #*4*JA-·:/f*£# /- - '9 8 .:. --@j t•*4•~ 1 L ..44.3 -u·; ~....... " A E r:41: :.R./-1,' * •671:.9 -3-1. 0 - •* t , . 1 .:j¢N . -- 9.711.- 1•4 11 ......Tr. a. 'f.·: .0 '0:4.41,-,~~0~~ ...... ~121£h'' 1.*tt:T- 3312 - eki - )El 1 l.., r : .:0' . : '* I* . . 4 '·.9.h ..2.. - :. I. I'.:tivE,~434_' *$**44;*7.9,Hv . 4 1.' .. 1214222€42 ... 0 . ...9 Bottom: The Everhard Lift is undetectable as you approach the . .. ...... .......... I handicapped entrance to this historic building. VERHARD LIFTS are ACCESSIBLE. The Everhard Lift is easy to operate ; Below left: The Everhard Lift is still not visible as the door to convenient, safe, easy to either from the lift or from inside the building. The lift provides the building is opened. f /4 4 4' smooth, safe transition for wheelchair users and persons with use and aesthetically Second from bottom Enclosed rails rise from the ground , 0 limited mobility, to surround the Everhard Lift on three sides to provide extra safety. pleasing. Everhard Lifts Second from top: The Everhard Lift carries its passengers , are an ideal way to provide access to QUALITY. The Everhard Lift is constructed of high grade gently toward the open door. 4/'ll buildings while maintaining steel. There are few moving parts, so the cost of maintenance is ip Top: Access from the Everhard Lift to the building is smooth and : 1 & low. The lift sits in a sturdy concrete base that is kept dry with a 7. architectural integrity. convenient. --€A sump pump. UNOBTRUSIVE. The Everhard Lift is hidden , I.• b·X·..~~ underground until it is needed. Enclosed rails rising out of the COMPLIANCE. The Everhard Lift meets all pertinent ...2- .f - ...7'. . ...:- . -ivit + - •4 $; 1 - /' F*r . · *04- ground are the first indication that a lift is present. Because of requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. .1 001 -L .4212 + . . I.Lk the lift's sturdy construction, its platform can be covered with 4 0 - .. „11: , ?&.t 1 ,% material matching the surrounding surface - concrete, asphalt, 4 0 * li A} 0 . bricks or paving stone - further enhancing the lift's · · . . 63 ¥ ..3 fr .71. ~ 341 ' *Sr I, I . I .Ch• J / i ¥4 appearance. 4:· , ·, ..,t ~ *t *' ' ' 0 I I 83 .. l I 4,9 0 . i-#f 4 24.1 . ADAPTABLE. The Everhard Lift can be custom *4 .' -/ ./ '' -I.·1/3*"I/"Ill'll//* , 'A ....4 designed to fit special needs. The lift can be adapted to blend ' ~ '~~~~y -ttijt 4 1,7 1¢4 k , 0.4.-LAI· M.,33%e~?4 f . '. , with many architectural styles, allowing one to balance the , j 3, , , , il *,ii, M* »2 N. 3 0'4 11 - C 9 # 4 ' 'A' 74 /, 1 ... '. A needs for handicapped access with historic preservation. It is * Nk '*1' *I $44 s vi . &,1, I , ,,. X A-3 '' .t '700 / 4*2. - - -_ ./ 1.f , 4, 1.. '6 . 1, 1. '. - 9.... I= I nt- appropriate for retrofit or new construction. . , .35, =a - NK+ I + 99* ' . 2 * D y ./ - ..14 A 4 ··,1 ' ·AMe 6, ¥1 - '4 4 , I K i i --- .. . C; *. 73 ,. t, 1 .... rTOP OF RAILS & LIFT SECTION 1 E-• 1 k. 10 PREPARATIONS BY OTHERS TOP OF PIT SPECIFICATIONS . .. 1/ lE C . ® PIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ELEVATOR/LIFT SAFETY CODES · AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES AND REGULATIONS MODEL .... , ~ ~ SURFACE TI«*NESS ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ti) PIT WALLS MUST BE PLUMB *1/4" AND SQUARE SERIAL NUMBER: G.C./ARCH. 1. 21" 4 TO CO~~ RATED SPEED: 17 FEET PER MINUTE 4-' TO THE UPPER LANDING RATED LOAD: 750 LBS. 4 , i ~ PIT FLOOR MUST BE LEVEL FOR PROPER OPERATION OF LIFT A INSIDE CLEAR TRAVEL a PIT WATER PROOFING AND SUMP OR DRAIN WITH ~ PIT DEPTH / WEIGHT: APPROXIMATELY LBS. ' V COVER AS REQUIRED (TO BE LOCATED IN THIS AREA ONLY) DRIVE: CHAIN/SPROCKET MEETING ANSI 829.1 ® piT FLOOR DESIGNED TO SUPPORT LOAD AND W REACTIONS SHOWN GEARING: DOUBLE REDUCTION WORM GEAR 13.185~- MOTOR: 2 H.P. 1725 R.P.M. INSTANT REVERSING 208-220-240 VOLTS 3 PHASE POWER FEED TO LUGS OF POWER SUPPLY: 208/230 3 PHASE 60 HZ. 30 AMP DISCONNECT ~ THE LIFT CONTROLLER (LOCATED PER DRAWING) FROM SEPERATE LOCKABLE FUSED DISCONNECT PLATFORM: 16.5 SQUARE FEET NON-SKID SURFACE PLATFORM ENCLOSURE: TWO SIDES 47 -45" HIGH ; A -71 1/4 N.cHoR . t-\ DISCONNECT TO BE LOCATED PER LOCAL CODES AND PLATFORM LOWER LANDING GATE OHINGED LEFT ¤HINGED RIGHT G' ARCHITECT/AGENT DIRECTION . 1 PLATFORM CONTROLS: 24 VOLT KEYED. UP AND DOWN CON5TANT q ~ ... PRESSURE WrTH EMERGENCY STOP/ALARM & fl 120 VOLT DUPLEX RECEPTACLE RATED NOT LESS THAN 15 AMP (FLUSH MOUNTED IN SIDE PANEL) PLAN VIEW '1 179 -,r C~/ FOR SUMP AND SERVICE CONVIENIENCE (FLUSH MOUNTED) 1 GRAB RAIL: LOCATED AT REQUIRED HEIGHT + j =El £ 0 / 42.00' PLATFORM DIAERSION /§\ STUB IN ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR UPPER AND LOWER LANDING CONTROLS: 24 VOLT KEYED UP AND DOWN WITH CONSTANT W CALL SEND STATIONS PER ARCHITECT/AGENT DIRECTION PRESSURE (SURFACE MOUNT) 7- · MANUAL OPERADON: IN THE EVENT OF A POWER FAILURE, UNIT CAN BE -.0 SILL PLATE TO REDUCE RUNNING CLEARANCE TO 3/4" OF MANUALLY RAISED OR LOWERED (TOOL REQUIRED) 1 4 INCHES g SUFFICIENT STRENGTH TO PREVENT DEFLECTION NORMAL UMITS: FULLY ADJUSTABLE TO MAX. HEIGHT OF - - AS WHEELCHAIR TRAVERSES . FINAL UMITS: TOP AND BOTTOM ACTIVATED IN THE EVENT NORMAL 4- 4 - UMITS FAIL 00 A_..1 €h FINISH OF PLATFORM SURFACE IF OTHER THAN STANDARD MACHINE UMIT: OPERATED BY THE DRMNG MECHANISM. ACTNATES IN V CHECKERPLATE STEEL. ie BRICK, CONCRETE, ETC. THE EVENT THAT THE NORMAL AND FINAL UMITS FAIL -DIS DISCO-ECT ~ . MACHINE ACCESS PANEU BOLTED AND SAFETY INTERLOCKED 57800 L M.AIFO-1 0./EN/*,N n INSTRUCTIONS: CAR OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS, DATA TAGS, AND I l•PER CALL/se®L_J CAPAC[TY PLATES , DIMENSION ANISH: STANDARD DOVE GREY (0PT10NS AVAILABLE) 1 SECTION A-A A B C 4 MODELS ACTUAL SnE LOVEN CALA/SEND ® (-2 un ,-,7 PIT DEPTH VERTICAL. TRUVEL IURFACE 71*clo€SS UPPER LAN-0 - 42" 66" - - OPTIONS 1 .... 54" 78" I 66" 90" O UPPER LANDING GATE O HINGED LEFT O HINGED RIGHT 1 O PEDESTAL MOUNT CALL/SEND CONTROLS ON PLATFORM 1 1\1 GROUD«) LEVEL 78" 102" O PEDESTAL FOR MOUNnNG UPPER/LOWER CALL/SEND CONTROLS 1 0 ELECTRO/MECHANICAL INTERLOCK 1. 90" 114 VERTICAL T~ O KEYED CALL/SEND STATIONS (FLUSH MOUNT) . 0 I G.CJMCH. · · 102" 126" ¤ ASSIST CALL BUTTON FOR UPPER AND LOWER CALL/SEND STATIONS , r 1 TO . .. (OWNER/AGENT TO PROVIDE 24 VOLT BELL) . A 1. i .. 114 138" ¤ AUDIO/VISUAL PEDESTRIAN ALERT < t. d. 1 126" 150" O SINGLE PHASE POWER REQUIREMENT 220/230 VOLT . (0.C/ARCH. TO CO*0-) 1 , ¤ MANUAL LOWERING TOOL 1 4. I . V ./: ... 138" 162" ~ UPPER LANDING BRIDGE . 4 144 184" O FACIA PANEL ¤ ADDmONAL KEYS . O OPTIONAL PAINT COLOR O BRICK RED O FOREST GREEN O BEIGE 14.44.1] 1 -. ' tr] f i--AL L .- O CUSTOM COLOR 3 SAMPLES REQUIRED CONCRETE PIT MANUFACTURER NAME COLOR CODE UPT D-NSION 00 NOT TO SCALE MANUFACTURER NUMBER ~ BWE PrT WALLS AND FLOOR 1 RED UFT SIDE PANELS - 010(q L J UFT PlATFORM DIS®E Pl DNENSION UNX' MT FLOOR TO SUPPORT LOAD L I r=<1 . ATI |~ BLACK UFT MAIN FRAME AND BASE -m Fir -- OF 3.. KIPS (14CLUDES -ACT) r-4---A- O-/ AGING TECHNOLOGIES INC, 10- TOR 0013-FLIC-01 LIft (606)231-1738 Everlgk LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40581 DWG #: DATE: BY: ~C -1Di,i REV.: rEV.: TrPICAL .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Minor Development extension of conditions: Pitkin County Courthouse temporary wheelchair lift device Date: November 11, 1992 ' ,. ..,;.=.-t· i SUMMARY: The County is requesting an extension of the Minor Development approval conditions given by the HPC for the construction of a temporary wheelchair lift at the west elevation of the Courthouse. DISCUSSION: Funds have been reserved in the 1993 budget to apply to a partial appropriation already made toward the construction of the interior elevator for the Courthouse, as required by the ADA. In lieu of the permanent elevator, the HPC previously reviewed and granted approval for a temporary lift last year, with the condition of a one year deadline date. That date has passed, and the County is seeking HPC's extension of this deadline condition until next year, when it is anticipated that the new elevator will finally be constructed. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC approve the County's request for a one year extension of the deadline condition for the temporary lift at the Courthouse, effective the date of the extension approval. memo.courthouse.cond.ext , t ? C t£, ·-: 44 i A:ihej ,- r}. 0.,-, 7 -14 , 1, --7/...r '_·- 4 ~'/ W··~ lk. V.,lo: - ..4 6% 1,~····: ' ' V - ff V V V 1. K ''9*f \ .. MEMORANDUM To: Tom Newland, Assistant County Manager Building Department Zoning Officer ~ Bill Poss, HPC Project Monitor From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Conditions of approval for Building Permit: Pitkin County Courthouse temporary wheelchair lift devise Date: January 9, 1991 The following additional conditions of HPC approval for the temporary wheelchair lift device for the Courthouse shall be met by the applicant and contractor: 1) The window in the stairway shall be protected by a wood covering. 2) Concrete paving shall be removed, lawn area restored, once devise is removed, which shall occur no later than one year from installation. Colored tinting is not required for this temporary paving. 3) Sandstone blocks and capstones to be removed and stored shall be numbered inconspicuously, in such a manner than when original stone work is restored, the markings are not visible. 4) West wall of the courthouse, where devise will be shall installed, shall be protected with wood. Wood protection covering shall not exceed the size of the lift device. . 1 5) Applicant/contractor shall continue to be in communication with Preservation Officer (first) and HPC Project Monitor (Bill Poss) during construction and restoration. memo.courthouse.cond. .. Pitkin County October !9, 1992 Roxanne Etlin Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: PITKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE Dear Roxanne and Committee Meinbers; This is to discuss with you two proposed improvements to the Pitkin County Courthouse, located at '605 East Main Street. 506 Temporary Wheelchair Lift. It has come to my attention that the temporary placement and use of the wheelchair lift on the west side of the Courthouse, a project approved by you, has expired. The proposal calls for the use of the lift for handicap access to the main floor of the Courthouse until an internal elevator can be placed. Through the 1992 budget process, the Board of County Commissioners allocated $80,000 for placement of the internal elevator. I hired a local architect, Gibson and Reno, to develop plans and determine costs for the elevator. A local contractor familiar with elevator installation estimated the total project cost at about $180,000. I submitted a capital project request for the additional $100,000 through the 1993 budget and hope to have this item approved by the Board. If approved, I can begin construction on the elevator in January, 1993. This is to request that the Historic Preservation Committee consider granting an extension of the use of the temporary wheelchair lift until the internal elevator is operational. At the earliest, the internal elevator will be ready by March, 1993. If the additional funding is not approved, placement of the elevator will have to wait until the next budget cycle (1994). Relocation of the Flagpole. The flagpole is currently located on the roof of the cupola of the Courthouse, and is a serious safety hazard. The precarious location of the flagpole has prohibited county staff from raising and lowering the tlags on a daily basis, and the flags are only lowered and raised when replacement is warranted. Even then, county staff is forced to place a ladder on the roof of the Courthouse and change the flag on the top of the ladder, exposing themselves to a potential (and deadly) fall. Needless to say, this task is done only when absolutely necessary. There are two possible solutions to this unsafe condition. One is to place a permanent ladder and scaffold on the Courthouse cupola. This permanent access, along with fall prevention devices, would enable county staff to access the ttagpole in a relatively safe manner. However, these improvements would almost certainly change the existing character of the cupola by introducing modern facilities to the outside of a historic structure. The other alternative would Administration County Commissioners County Attorney Personnel and Finance Transportation 530 E. Main, 3rd Floor Suite B Suite I Suite F Facilities Aspen, CO 81611 506 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street 76 Service Center Road (303) 920-5200 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 FAX 920-5198 (303) 920-5150 (303) 920-5190 (303) 920-5220 (303) 920-5390 .. be to relocate the tlagpole so that it is no longer on the Clipola. There appears to be an anchor for a tlagpole adjacent to the main (south) entrance of the Courthouse jllSt to the west of the entry walkway. This existing anchor could be rehabilitated to support a modest flagpole. This location would be easy accessible, allowing county staff to raise and remove the flag on a daily basis without exposing themselves to an unsafe condition. Although this proposed relocation would alter the existing appearance of the Courthouse by removing the tlagpole from the roof, I don't believe that such an action would be counter to historic record. Enclosed with this letter please find an excerpt from a book I found in the public library entitled Aspen's Early Days. A Walking Tour. A photograph of the Courthouse on Page 20 shows the cupola with6iit a tlagpole. I am concerned about the unsafe condition of the tlagpole and would like to address this situation in the near future. Therefore, I am requesting that the Historic Preservation Committee consider this item and render an opinion as to possibility of 1) improving the cupola to permit safe access, or 2) pursuing the relocation of the tlagpole to the location described above. Thank you for your consideration of these items. Please contact me at 920-5209 if you have any questions. Sincerely, PITKI-coM>TY PUBL ORKS ENCY ewland, Deputy Directo of Public Works CC: Reid Haughey, County Manager Scott Mackey, Facilities Manager Lyn Byars, Building Maintenance Supervisor Hilary Smith, Risk Manager - r©0% tit. A f ifi#*91;wt\,64 . & 4'b€W# f-A- 454. 1 "04, I .'-/4.1 9-r.:94/ 4~4., 1 f. .*-·4.4·V~' R. .1.12 4 *t· , 2 E. w, '4)% ,·~'ri,- { A ) f ' *. - '. / *912 942 0'40.4,#d#TAC#.5. ''·4-r· 0 1 4. I , - - p . - * . , 1 -- I Air. --- IF;= 62,_ 41 11 /7- - - 8 0 - ~11]dUL„. p A nut,mi ' ~4 -19' '3 , tem = ..... /2 -· 17..rim '147 c #*-211':,.:·U: ----~-m:Ilitilit :00 t 1 , 01,.,.21, r :- "!b'0; t . 111 t »03#»ff,LUA· - i·"!71 , p t....m,111"'114 + ..4 . 9?*EF,i:,~~ K, 4% 1 01 ./ WGI=.ltsb .914, 'p . 4 *.4,- ..:.r ll ,- - - %¢. ..t.1, 14 - .. 1 1...1-2,69=4 ..~ R 4 \. I , ·;~111|filUiJA4 '' ..9 -IM}~NUAU..F - '/ < ...4 1 Ji*.WIlll»*F ; f .UNIUIL,re · r.,1 4 AH, 3.: N.i. : 1 1 11 4 .* I.- ' : ! :d '347 75''I - -:L/ ,1 i61. 4< 2444¢45; ~ *:'f;- 25 . 1. -... •e./...4>.. i · - . A / 4, I .. i i Again, the newspapers found ample cause for complaint when they noted April of 1889, but that the travel expenses incurred by the commissioners were to be paid by $560 he clai, ied was L ~ the taxpayers. The ultimate outrage: Perry Snyder's term as county com- In 1890, the courtlil missioner was to expire in less than two weeks! Brown and (Ic,ag 13 loc·]1~ Oblivious to the commotion, the commissioners found the courthouse 'old courthodse was renq in Fort Collins most impressive and agreed that Aspen should follow its offices available for rent.! 1 example, A Denver architect, William Quayle, was hired to draw the available to the new com plans. Angered by the Times unrelenting opposition, the commissioners . No new provisions u·, took action to see that the newspaper no longer would serve as their official cominissioners in Januar: organ, a capacity enjoyed by the Times since 1886. Pearce for $1,500 in 18 6 On December 30th, 1888, the matter of improper funding was heard . flimsy was this structure , before a grand jury but not enough evidence was found to bring an indict- by cutting a hole uith a i ment. So the press and the politicians continued their quarrel, boards with a broom ha: Plans for the courthouse, presented by William Quayle, met with im- wanted in Red Cliff JJI r mediate disapproval from the Aspen Daily Times which described the plans Slieriff White proin~ in an angry editorial as an "abortive architectural aspiration." Aspen should description of the wily .\: ' have a "solid sub- E. M. Buford-Fi i stantial Court House . blue eyes, round 6 ~ in keeping with a teeth out, squeek wide awake busi- 180 lbs., forty w new tongued boot ness community, · ranted the Times. ' Among the citizens of A: needed. It might please , 1 .. 1. 1 4 farmers to come The condition of in and watch the been a jail simpl. ¢ swallows nesting ture, by all mean. 1 in the gingebread 4 something more t on the roof; it -I with which to dig 1 might do for some 1 Whether or not the con · more dead than tl t alive summer re- is a matter for specillati, sort. ...In short % 4 L , belated public call ~ we do not want a awarded the contract- o roof perched up ~K commissioners opened t] in the air, but a e U r.... Hooper favored the lane public building in ./ L , ' Keeping with the ~, by his brother Charlie, i . character of the the land was out of toni city. a# site on Cooper Avenue Overriding all cen- alternative in the Hal]:li sure, William missioners decided in fa, to his brother, in August Quayle's plans were . 1 Construction began E accepted and event- ually used. Quayle 2 not entirely appeased. was paid $475 in the cornerstone of high]> 20 T - MEMO TO: HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE / 02- 2 0 FROM: SCOTT MACKEY RE: COURTHOUSE ROOF DATE: 5-30-96 The courthouse roof is in need of repair. For the past several years it has been patched due to leakage. It has continued to get worse each year. It is to the point now that it needs to be completely reroofed. I propose doing the flat section with Burkline single ply rubber roofing system. Normal color is white which is the color that is there now. For the pitched part I propose using Prestique premium laminated shingles. I would like to use the thickest with a 40 year warranty. My suggestion for color would be barkwood. I can live with any of the color choices however. I understand that these are the same two types of roofing systems that were used on City Hall. If you need more information on the types of systems I propose to use please feel free to contact me at 920-5763. Your immediate attention and approval will be greatly appreciated. Thanks / L---h RE'€*9-Efr JUN 0 7 1996 Scott Mackey Facilities Maint,~Dir. -01-121 U P-Oble 134- j U;*,Gu10\-*1 a·g-rbwA\-- «lit#~62-c 225\ cur I Efy i 00 *0-1 0