The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.514 N 3rd St.47A-895~ ' 514 N. 3rd Street Historic 1/. 9923329) -Designation 2735-124-16-001 4 47A-89 j LL 5 i "co, 1 7 4 -19 3/6 91 G- 1 00 9 6 --flg ,_f- Ave- <4(~ 82 + A- 0 - 6- 9 1 7 .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2735-124-16-001 47A-89 STAFF MEMBER: CE E PROJECT NAME: 514 N. 3rd Street Historic Designation Project Address: 514 N. 3rd St. Legal Address: APPLICANT: Donald Rinqsbv Applicant Address: P. 0. Box 7240. Denver. CO REPRESENTATIVE: Same Representative Address/Phone: PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: n/a NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date Cpi(o PUBLIC HEARING: 3~_D NO - kÂ¥4) idfkl \ 4,- VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO f CC Meeting Date 6// A PUBLIC HEARING: UCES-3 NO 6Â«f go 4-. 9;91 Uj - I VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: I . K) 70 CA) ~ BOOK 601 PAGE 140 0 1 = 09 IND -1. U) -h} ORDINANCE NO. 34 Q (Series of 1989) fo C AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 514 NORTH THIRD STREEK~AND'1004 EAST DURANT STREET, #1, AS H, HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT- TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF THE LAND USE CODE. WHEREAS, Donald and Karen Ringsby, as owners of the real property described as 514' North Third Street (metes and bounds legal description attached), City and Townsite Of Aspen, Colorado; and Sandra Lore, as owner of the real property described as 1004 East Durant Street, #1, East 8' of Lot L, and the West 22' of Lot M, Block 47, East Aspen Townsite, have filed an application for historic landmark designation pursuant to Section 7-701 of the Land Use Code, and WHEREAS, the property at 514 N. 3rd St. was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "4"; and the property located at 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1, was listed in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures on April 11, 1989, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "4", and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee recommended historic designation for both structures at a duly noticed public hearing on May 10, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended historic designation at a duly noticed public hearing on June 6, 1989; and . WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. ILY'A DAVIS ITKI CNTY RECORDE :. . BOOK 601 pmÂ£141 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the property at 514 North Third Street, Aspen, (described by metes and bounds attached hereto), and the property at 1004 East Durant Street, E. 8' of Lot L, W. 22' of Lot M, Block 47, East Aspen Townsite, be granted H, Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the Planning Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map ,to reflect said rezoning. Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5 That a public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the /Â£59Â» 2 *oox 601 82142 day of , 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Uo Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the samet shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the /4Â»uday o f~- 1989. V- Lk-- Al t=34_~ . R 4 CF 43'.,/,4 7 William L. Stirling, Mayor : 1 d'*ATL'- I . : '9.0â‚¬4 i.. : N Kathryn G. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this /0%"7 day of (3Â« , 1989. 9 r Michael Gassman~ Mayor Pro. Tem 3<T::.gi, - - - (SNAL# i . 005#it ' .~ ' Kathryn . Koch, City Clerk ord.514n3.1004ed 3 "'â€ž,1,11,1,%, ig 6/7#421 )315-~44-)6-0-01 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: 514 N. 3rd St. Date: May 10, 1989 LOCATION: 514 N. 3rd St., (legal_description: metes and bounds) APPLICANT: Donald and KareA Rinbgsby J /Li/' 7-v 0,\ APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the c. 1884 cottage at 514 N. 3rd St. A Landmark Designation grant of $2,000 is also being requested by the applicant, which will be granted by Council at second and Final reading of the Designation Ordinance. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: "4" SUMMARY: This property will become Aspen's 94th designated historic landmark. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearing at P&Z level), then first and second reading (public hearing at Final reading) of the designation ordinance by Council. The designation grant is expected to be approved by Council at Final reading as well. An application for HPC minor development review is expected to be submitted to the Planning Office within the next few weeks, which involves the rehabilitation of attic space into two bedrooms, requiring UBC flexibility by the Building Department for historic landmarks. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. .Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets the criteria in both Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake District" has long been 0 0 considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation is a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End character. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and additional wing added. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC recommend for approval Landmark Designation for 514 N. 3rd St. memo.hpc.514n3 2 . .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council Thru: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Historic Landmark Designation - 514 N. 3rd St. and 1004 E. Durant St., Second Reading, Ordinance #32 Date: July 10, 1989 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of Ordinance #32, Series of 1989 on Second Reading, which combines two Landmark Designations in one ordinance. Both applicants have applied for a $2,000 Designation Grant, which they are eligible for through Ordinance 42, Series of 1987. LOCATIONS: 514 N. 3rd St., Aspen 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1, Aspen APPLICANTS: 514 N. 3rd St. - Donald and Karen Ringsby 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1 - Sandra Lore HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: Both structures are rated "4" PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Both structures have received HPC and P&Z recommendations for designation approval; HPC - May 10, 1989, P&Z - June 6, 1989. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one ( 1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that both applications meet the criteria in Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: 514 N. 3rd St.: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake district" has long been considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation in a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End. .. 1004 E. Durant: The Durant Avenue historic context has been lost overtime. The lone survivor of a once extremely built-out street, 1004 E. Durant would now be considered a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood. Dozens of one and two-story cottages lined Durant 100 years ago; it is amazing to find this cottage, now with its condominiumized addition and in such good condition, still surviving. Its preservation is extremely necessary due to this fact alone. Certainly the historic character of the neighborhood is gone; however, in the larger context of the East Aspen Townsite, 1004 E. Durant is an excellent example of Aspen's family lifestyle heritage. Standard F. Community Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: 514 N. 3rd St.: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and the addition of a wing. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. 1004 E. Durant: The classic components of an Aspen miner's cottage are the mainstay of this structure. The front porch, the cross gable roof form and pitch, fenestration, materials and chimney are all elements critical to preserve. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to approve Ordinance #32, Series of 1989 on Second Reading." "Move to approve the $2,000.00 designation grant for both structures, located at 514 N. 3rd St. and 1004 E. Durant St., 2 .. .. Unit #1. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: memo.cc.514n3.1004ed.2 3 . .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen City Council Thru: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: First Reading: Landmark Designation - 514 N. 3rd St. and 1004 E. Durant St. Date: June 12, 1989 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of Ordinance (Series of 1989) on First Reading, which combines two Landmark Designations in one ordinance. Both applicants have applied for a $2,000 Designation Grant, which they are eligible for through Ordinance 42, Series of 1987. LOCATIONS: 514 N. 3rd St., Aspen 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1, Aspen APPLICANTS: 514 N. 3rd St. - Donald and Karen Ringsby 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1 - Sandra Lore HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: Both structures are rated "4" PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Both structures have received HPC and P&Z recommendations for designation approval; HPC - May 10, 1989, P&Z - June 6, 1989. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that both applications meet the criteria in Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: 514 N. 3rd St.: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake district" has long been considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation in a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End. .. 1004 E. Durant: The Durant Avenue historic context has been lost overtime. The lone survivor of a once extremely built-out street, 1004 E. Durant would now be considered a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood. Dozens of one and two-story cottages lined Durant 100 years ago; it is amazing to find this cottage, now with its condominiumized addition and in such good condition, still surviving. Its preservation is extremely necessary due to this fact alone. Certainly the historic character of the neighborhood is gone; however, in the larger context of the East Aspen Townsite, 1004 E. Durant is an excellent example of Aspen's family lifestyle heritage. Standard F. Community Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: 514 N. 3rd St.: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and the addition of a wing. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. 1004 E. Durant: The classic components of an Aspen miner's cottage are the mainstay of this structure. The front porch, the cross gable roof form and pitch, fenestration, materials and chimney are all elements critical to preserve. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to read Ordinance (Series of 1989) on First Reading." "Move to approve Ordinance (Series of 1989) on First Reading." 2 .. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: memo.cc.514n3.1004ed 3 .. ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1989) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 514 NORTH THIRD STREET AND 1004 EAST DURANT STREET, #1, AS H, HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF THE LAND USE CODE. WHEREAS, Donald and Karen Ringsby, as owners of the real property described as 514 North Third Street (metes and bounds legal description attached), City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and Sandra Lore, as owner of the real property described as 1004 East Durant Street, #1, East 8' of Lot L, and the West 22' of Lot M, Block 47, East Aspen Townsite, have filed an application for historic landmark designation pursuant to Section 7-701 of the Land Use Code, and WHEREAS, the property at 514 N. 3rd St. was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "4"; and the property located at 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1, was listed in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures on April 11, 1989, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "4", and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee recommended historic designation for both structures at a duly noticed public hearing on May 10, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended historic designation at a duly noticed public hearing on June 6, 1989; and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. .. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the property at 514 North Third Street, Aspen, (described by metes and bounds attached hereto), and the property at 1004 East Durant Street, E. 8' of Lot L, W. 22' of Lot M, Block 47, East Aspen Townsite, be granted H, Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the Planning Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said rezoning. Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5 That a public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 2 .. day of , 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk ord.514n3.1004ed 3 .. -3 62Â£61 42-6%2~.<1 V urt \3 ALÂ«_ 7 1 -1 Â«cCU C\ki- h.64.4_-tj 40 4--4-L Â£,n.c_fo y_cf /15+ 4-2 i~*-9,4 Un.U..n~ur Â» 409+0-U-2.-/ 6&3301- 49/k.AJ~L 4 6114 U'nt 01 5 j 4 N. Std . 94- 2- 9 U/ru-, 4 Jq 89 .. fli~4 r- PUBUC NO!,CE~~~~~ t RE: LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 514 N P-3rd SL 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public i hearing will be held on Tuenday, June 6, 1989 at & a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen B Planning and Zoning Commission in the Second i Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S Galena St, A. Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application ifrom Donald & Karen Ringgby requesting his- I toric landmark designation for the property ated at 514 North 3rd Street more specifical- ~~lescrihed as a tract ofland in the NE X SEY. of Sec 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West, known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40, Hallam'Â§ Addition. For further information contact the Aspen/ Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S Galena St, Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-5090. s/C Weiton Anderson, Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times May 18, 1989. 6 CS/ram - 0. 1. 1 Order Number: 11844 SCHEDULE A Commitment Number: 1. Effective date: September 26, 1983 at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount 01 Insurance Premium $412,500.00 $914.75 A. ALTA Ownefs Policy ~ Proposed Insured: D. W. Ringsby Enterprises | B. ALTA Loan Policy s 212,500.00 100.00 Proposed Insured: Tax Certificate 5.00 Mary L. Wright and David L. Wright C. $ 3. The estate or interest in the land described or relerred to In this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date ~ hereof vesied in. Mary L. Wright and David L. Wright 1 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: A tract of land in the NE;~SE14, Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner Lot 1, Block 40, Hallam's Addition, being a point 1017.31 ft. S. 81021'W from the Ek corner Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. (1954 Brass Cap) and 224.32 ft. N. 03'23'E from the city monument on the NE corner of Smuggler and North 3rd Street (1959 approved city plat); thence S. 00Â°08'W. 103.38 feet along the East line of North 3rd Street; thence S. 75'09'11" E. 48.14 feet along the Northerly line of the alley in Block 40, to the Easterly line of Lot 2; thence N. 14'50'49" E. 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 2 to the NE corner of Lot 2; thence N. 75'09'11"W. 74.40 feet along the Northerly line of Lots 1&2 to the point of beginning. Also a tract of land 30.0 feet long and 1.2 feet wide which tract is more partic- ularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1 Block 40 of tile unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen; thence S. 75Â°09'11"E. 18.14 feet to the true point of beginning being the common Southerly corner of Lots 1&2 of said Block 40; thence S.75'09'11" E 30.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 2 (said line being the Northerly line of the alley in rearÂ· of Lot 2of said Block 40); thence S.14'50'49"W. 1.2 feet; thence N.75Â°09'11"W. 30.00 feet; thence N. 14'50'49"E. 1.2 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 4Â«r-oÂ«~ Authorized Countersignature Page 2 .= rE' E'VAR .., Y ... Â¥ 1. ./1 1 1 1 1,AL GUARANTY COMPANY 1652 (20M-4-83) .. G Ff EXHIBIT "Al' A tract of land in the NE#SE#, Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner Lot 1, Block 40, Hallam's Addition, being a point 1017.31 ft. S.81Â°21'W from the Et corner Sec. 12, T.ZOS., .R85W., 6P.M. (1954 Brass Cap) and 224.32 ft. N. 03Â°23'E from the city monument on the NE corner of Smuggler and North 3rd Street (1959 approved city plat); thence S.00Â°08'W. 103.38 feet* along the East line of North 3rd Street; thence S. 75Â°09'11"E. 48.14 feet along the Northerly line of the alley in Block 40, to the Easterly line of Lot 2; thence N. 14Â°50'49"E. 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 2 to the NE corner of Lot 2; thence N.75Â°09'11"W. 74.40 feet along the Northerly line of Lots 1 & 2 to the point of beginning. Also a tract of land 30.0 feet long and 1.2 feet wide which tract is more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1 Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen; thence S. 75Â° 09'11"E. 18.14 feet to the true point of beginning being the common Southerly corner of Lots 1&2 of said block 40; thence S.75'09'11"E. 30.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 2 (said line being the Northerly line of the alley in rear of Lot 2 of said Block 40); thence S.14Â°50'49"W. 1.2 feet; thence N.75Â°09'11"W. 30.00 feet; thence N.14Â°50'49"E. 1.2 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. IltÂ·e<itÂ·~Ii'<I ;tt ..... t;'tÂ·lt,tÂ·k M., between DAVID L. WRIGHT and MARY L. WRIGHT i~ f the ~ County of Pitkin ancl State of Colorado, c,1 the first part, and D.W. RINGSBY ENTERPRISES, a partnership whose legal addressis P.O. Box 7240 Denver, CO 80207 ofthe Counly of Dellver and Stateof 1 Colorado, of the second part: WITNESSE'1'll, That the said partieSof the filÂ·st pinÂ·l, fur und in cansideration of TEN DOLLARS ~($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration 0(M/A/M I to the said part ieS of the filÂ·.,l part in hand paid by said part y of the second part, the receipt whereof is 3 hereby confessed and ack nowledged, haVegranted, 1, argained, sold und eonveyed, and by these presents cio grant, bargain, sell, convey .ind confirm, untu the said part y of the second part,itS henÂ·s and assigns for- ever, all the following described lot Orparcel o fland, situate, lying:ind being in the County of Pitkin and State of ('c,lcitÂ·,1 410, to wit: : SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY ~ THIS REFERENCE. li NE 99Â«)~- Se-(bualeÂ«4_r_. IX- TIOJ- g_35-Gb AwÂ»L- 0.4-~ 49 <+ 2 L Â£lk. 4,0 f *~--ukhocc/<Rk MOU- 5430<V . ,i ill:(i knuwn as :treet and num!}e r 514 N. Third Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 1'0(;El'llER with all kind:ingillar the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging,or in anywise apper- i' t;,ining, and the reversion :ind revel'Sion:, remainder und remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and 711 the istate, right. title, intelÂ·est, claim und demand whatsoever of the said parl les of the first part, either in law or 'q equity, of, in und to the above binÂ·galned premises, with the hereditaments and apputÂ·tenances. 710 11.,U'E AND TO 1101.1) the said premises aboveÂ· bargained :ind deMeribed with the Up])litÂ·lenunees, unto the said part ~ of thi' second part, itsheirs und assigns ftn'ever. And the said part ies of the first part, forthem st.i ves tbAAK execultitÂ·s, and administrators, cio cuvetiant, grant, bargain, and agree to and i! witht|w said part Y tifthe siÂ·cond part, its heirs and assigns, thatilt thetime of theensealing and delivery ' oft hes<Â· presents, they are well Keized 01'the premises :11,(,vecunveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolule and i , 111<lefeasililiÂ·estaltÂ·of ilihet'itance, in law, iii fee si:nple, and ha ve good right, full power and authority lo grant bargain. Mell and convey the >urine in manner and ftnÂ·m as :tforesaid, and thal the same are free and eleniÂ· ' frum all fornwr and â€žther KIÂ·ants. halÂ·gains, SilleS, liens, taxes, assessments and encumbranies of whatever kind (if nature soeve r; EXCEPT general taxes of 1983 payable in 1984 and SUBJECT TO the rights as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 t Page 2; Easements as reserved to the City of Aspen as set forth an '~ instrument recorded in Book 253 at Page 664-all as recorded in the 2 1 i records of Pitkin County, Colorado. and t}w al,uve l,istÂ·gained premihiâ€¢A in the quiet ami lienceable possession of the sam part y of thesecondpart, its IwitÂ·.S a 1,1 1 41:Asigns against .all andevtâ€¢ry pers< morpersons law flit|yelaiming inÂ· toelitimthe whole orany part : thetÂ·eof,the said part ies oft he first palÂ·t Shall and will WA Rl{ ANTAND FOREVER DE IÂ·'END. I 1 IN WI'I'SESS \VillÂ·:121Â·N)F, the >mid part ieS oft}w fitÂ·:4 part Im Ve hetÂ·eunto seltheirlwin~ 11 811(1 >41.al s thr day antlyvill' tilÂ·.St al),ve written. .-1---ciAvir~-~*.~i~Ap~(SEAK.) 6â‚¬29*1 -- '_<*~~ghÂ¢U-_. -_(SEAL) ~~~~ WRIGH'f (SEAU 1 STATE 01'' COI.(.)1< A DO, SS. il Chmnly of Pitkin , 11 -- - (52&#A -- --- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this dayof October 19 83 , l) >1 DAVID L. WRIGHT and MARY L. Â¢'RIcid* 11>Â·cew.mi> 61,3,1 expires 5432142Â£44- 2.â‚¬, L-;;ft?, 7 . Wipiess~6Â· hand and official seal, Notary Public *DRESS :Go 2- E. l.45 44- (194.z c.ss g (6 1( No. 932 WARRANTY DEED.-For Photelfraphle Ztecord- Brad ford Publishing, 5823 W. lili Ave.. 1.akewâ€žod, CO 80214 - (303) 233Â·6900 , Â«.*. liN) 19 4 L 45-1 I Papcr-7 I. ...... -/....&.-..--- - 514 NORTH THIRD STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\ 0 1 f 6, . 6 - - ./m'**04 * , ....., 4 2 +X - â€¢i .*Tit.Â¥+ 5 -/4 0.3-rd -- -' b.* r , I - -'9 c Â· Ul j.;P 1 , Â·ffi' ' .$ . U 3 73 44 k) j r lo I #'46 , . belâ‚¬ s. 6 l o cl-O ~_~,4, 4 0- Lots /v 2) - fl/1040 * S au- Azon. L/e Qy*'27 9 3 7 W . 37'U.Â£97 lÂ« 20-4.-0440 , - 441*A -8 (61/j Â® lundÂ£y i V (*ct-0 2 3 6 1 Lj..2-. / Gste., 8/4// 0 2-aff* 8 aff ~ 332; 2*Fru,~0,7&06 -3 2 1 5 ZA- Po_ui br Qf) 63 WHA4/u 80 2-0 4 -@ cil ) 3 6Â£4,Â£) 9Â«Â» 612 --9/eÂ«~~~) 9 9 9 5. 8 clu./ c~ iDUL 04- 8 0 7- O-z_ Â® da-f--4/Â·u.â‚¬,0 ~d-FLO UÂ«-, C3001 @2 5 10 . 2.*- 23- 1 1 i 3 Gi,un,eefield Le N CO 07 "1. 4, d 2-0009 0*634;,&/t.6 3. d. / 4-35 0-) Â· ~0*w-.Â©L 57- At- 8/Grl c,#'6Â¢1.U. ~-EZily 7 Fled.&/ at~7LC611- câ‚¬.Â£~,- ce' A~f 3 8 0 /4-i~k dit AQUL (,4,0 8 0,2 4 5 110 4 0)-PRux u./3 --k.-~0 , /lt 6 90$c~4- 801rs I 0 0 ~0-ADHL 2--6 (&* V q oldull 60 4 0( 6 ~00Â«Â»e~fal.Â£40<_ E *-8-+ M A-GLAA Â¢1/3 4 1 0 0.4-fÂ»4 8 1 Gi f 9- '0.- 27'641 JV / clols(14 \41,06 . 1 034 . fo TO y G 70 0 G 40 ~ 1 LA- CA 9 00 67 34 - U \k J 041 4 1 4 4,1,3 990'Yl.Ed , 8(LÂ« lac M EL.4-0 a co Jauk- 3 LA- CA- 01 00 21 9 1,9 0-(at tooth 64-OAfto z /6-dlit 01Â«-0 C CL / q q b..1 33 04 -20 2/8 Ula- * M o Irui~rae_/ Al,-co d 130 60 Â· 17/k St- (Rossi (~-, V A. 211-09 4 1.09 - JAi,\%4-1~-4â€ž1. PaA,+71.Lulu~ 9/5 jÂ»<(C+k Sk Uf) 8 -11 {1 63 0 G.42*Â» *9*Â£ a~zu D r L._ wALZE ,. â‚¬Â£) lor e* 9a~-u.0 Etuu.90 I /1 6064/ ~ful ge. o g~tu,-6 G 02-turÂ»/rt, OV\W 63 0 V 6/2 67 tlÂ·03al]LIX -7 7 R. 0 2? 1,to'GAU"+2 3+ 61Â£.-O 2 4,14 N.40.0.,00 BOY 3/04 - ~-AfÂ·200â€¢u 8 1 6 IL 4.15 P tat# LF -~~45-ddr, 669 0 2 AUAAA'-~01 .Rl AQU.,o ~UA'L 4.+ / Cx.055 61(-, 0-//16 53% 28 1 il PÂ»AÂ£ Cl -05Â£,flir i N V S (At o C_ 071 9.0004-> 383 3 Jal<_* ZArn-26, 44 Ato Â»1.01/yu.o 20 ul i - 6-0 3 / 2-- 615- /4 3rd -~M f Â¥_ MÂ¥5 134.3Anld (tuyko 40 3 0-J . t}'U-Otlk_* t.,c'u !hiaÂ»_ ill - 6 18 01 toi â‚¬-67Ul- - 0~0 i A) 4 44 - 3&1/ 3+u/n d f 4.20 2,/ Ifid-YY//77/~J..S f)i. (3 0-04,ut . Mb - 2-1 a , D /) 4 20 03 Â· 00-ut-4 - {00 -Â»1. AJ, +te 1 33 6-30 +tu- 61- AJ lu LOGUL 06 - 2-00 09 7/ 9 433/6 - ge/)1 w RiG U.1997. /1(cu ye,4 7/4 N 3-rd (ILA- fil.Â»- g j 6 i i 6*) 1*k , Dirs . genD, 44. b a.930 6 4 0 61. 8 rd Lo~uuu 2/ b 1/ G 1-6 M 3.,/d d*fu\- 8 1 6 1/ 6 / 5 N Fd -k-/M e B YYbes b kt_.465Â·L -36,~~Â·i~, Uq; i Â£0 9Â»14_ CU; sc- 53 *0 9 (23 6 04 M 3-4/d - A - . \ A 4 AS ft- (iIAR T --45 2â‚¬) 3:11625 /*0'34 FUL W 27U-42L 216Â«-/'F 3 / 5 86_6_ aÂ»-6 DAPIAL 6 16 0 -----1--- 3 - 5-/4 /1/. 4 1Â£-4 -(116 @c<-Â£~L,PU,Yl 68 o v 9 55-f GA +AA 6 t bil 4 1 y 0 0 r- 10Â£P,D,Mit 9 FFl-.AÂ» R.Â¥ . -, 41,~GLd-2-, 5-- 2 0. 7;zU.~nzÂ»ec 0 e., Ditt*- 1 411 6 a 0 0 2. 41/ U oril sf -/Cpljj7 862Â«poe_- 431 76 7 - 5--tÂ« CG~,.E 10 9 U 9 #0'5- 3 4 0 ( 0 01-tk -4 4Â»jv\Â· 0 &119) S 4 0 , 5 '~dk~11-, CU,t OUA cQ_Â£,ni (94 - 9,10/ .. \ Attachment 5 /1 ir Public Hearing Notice Requirements L toril There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen-baria Use Regulations, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from Table 1, which is attached to this summary. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days priorÂ· .to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Planning Office Administrative Assistant and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Planning Office, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearingÂ· that posting took place. 3. Mailing Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Planning Office, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing (in the form of a signed affidavit) that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: a. Any federal agency, state, county or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. b. All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be sent 5 days prior to the hearing. C. Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty days prior to the date of public hearing. .. mABLE l an,4ARY~ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ILIZE---illill APPI/CATION TYPE PUBLIC HEARING REWIRED? BY WHCM FURM OF NarICE* Conditional Use Y Commission 2,3 Special Review N 8040 Greenline N Stream Margin N Mountain View Plane N Conceptual Historic Development Y HPC 1,2,3 Final Historic Development N Minor Historic Development N Historic Demolition Y HPC 1,2,3 Historic Designation Y HPC, Commis. HPC-1,2,3 & Council Commis.- 1,2,3 Council-4 b Conceptual SPA Y Council 1,2,3 Final SPA Y Cammission 1,2,3 Conceptual RJD L Y Council 1,2,3 Final. POD Y Commission 1,2,3 Subdivision Y . Commission 1,2,3 Condominiumization N Lot Split Y Council 1,2,3 I.ot line Adjustment N GMQS Allotment Y Commission 1,2,3 GMQS Exemption N (except for see above for lot split lot split) Map Amendments Y ammission & Commis.-1,2,3 Camcil Council-4 Text Amendments Y Commission & Commis.-1 Council Council-4 * Numbers refer to the following: 1 = Publication in newspaper 2 = Posting of property 3 - Mailing to surrounding landowners 4 = Ordinance adoption procedures .. Attachment 6 General Summary of Three Step HPC/Commission/Council Application Process 1. Application Types: The following are the Development Applications which are processed in three steps by the HPC, Commission and Council: * Designate Historic Structure 2. Development Review Procedure Summary. The three step HPC/ Commission/Council review procedure can be described as follows. Stage One: Attend pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with staff is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. Stage Two: Submit Development Application. Based on your meeting with staff, you should respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies of a complete application, with the appropriate processing fee, to the Planning Office. Stage Three: Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by a member of the staff. You will be notified in writing of whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not yOU have submitted what was requested, not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. Stage Four: Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, a date for its review by the HPC will be set. The submission due date is 25 days prior to the HPC review date, to allow for the required Public Hearing notice, staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review your application with respect to its compliance with the Code and to write a review memo. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. The memo is normally available at the end of the week before your hearing. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo when it is ready, or we can mail it to you if you so request. .. During the period of staff review, it is essential that public notice be given, when required for your development application. Attachment 5 explains how to go about giving the required notice. Your project will be presented to the HPC at a regularly scheduled meeting. A copy of the agenda showing where during the meeting your application is scheduled can be obtained when you pick up the staff memo. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. If an application for significant development is being consolidated with the designation process, the conceptual approval must be granted prior to the designation recommendation being made. Significant development is a two step process: conceptual review followed by final review. Conceptual development review is a public hearing, final is not. Usually final review may be accomplished within one month of conceptual approval, depending upon the scope of the project. Once a recommendation is made by the HPC, a review by the Commission can be scheduled. This review is typically scheduled for the next available agenda, within 30 days of the date of the HPC's recommendation. An updated staff memo will be prepared for this meeting, which will again be made available to you just prior to the meeting. Commission action normally requires a single meeting, unless additional information is requested. Once a recommendation is made by the Commission, a review by the Council can be scheduled. This review is typically scheduled for the next agenda, within about 15 days of the date Of the Commission's recommendation. Ordinance adoption, however, requires two readings by Council. The second reading is a public hearing. Due to notice requirements, the second reading is generally scheduled 3 or 4 weeks after first reading. If applicable, the designation grant will be included in the Ordinance. Stage Five: Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It Will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be .. collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is issued. For more information on the Building Permit Stage, please visit the Building Department to obtain handouts on their review procedures. 3. Consolidation: One and two step applications which you may consolidate with a three step application are: * Conditional use * Special review * ESA * GMQS exemption for historic landmark or affordable housing * Significant historic development * Minor historic development If you are submitting any of the above applications along with your three step application, you should also obtain the application package for that type of submission from this office. 3stepsumm ti, .. \< ATTACHMENT 2 ~j Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easemqnts, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the ' owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2"x 11" vicinity map locating the subj ect <52 parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. An explanation of why the proposed development complies with the substantive development review standards relevant to the Development Application. .. ATTACHME~ 3 /1 ~ Specific Subn~iss:ion Conten~s: Application~ for tIistoric Desi g~lation / I / ThÂ¢ application fo\r Historic De ignation shall include the followin9: / A. A bo ndary des ridtion of thecs'ite; 9- . A g~pt:<L Carle-,04 - t.f' 7 Â¢ A 34, T-AL_-, 6ox_ i' P\Cy' .LONÂ» (401= Â¥4U .. t ATTACHMENT 4/j Review Standards: Appittatien_foHistoric Designation Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the following standards may be designated as H, Historic Overlay District and/or Historic Landmark: A. Historical Importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. C. Architectural Importance. The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. D. Architectural Importance. The structure is a sig- nificant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. d E .~ Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a l~ Â·significant component of an historically significant : neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighbor- hood character. ~ to the preservation of the character of the Aspen Community Character. The structure or site is critical community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other struc- tures or sites of historical or architectural impor- tance. Recorded at __ -â€ž. _ 0'clock____M., f t Reception No. _ ~ _--~ Recorder. THIS DEEL), Made this day of October , 19 83 ' between DAVID L. WRIGHT and MARY L. WRIGHT ofthe Count)'of Pitkin and State of Colorado, of the first part, and D.W. RINGSBY ENTERPRISES, a partnership wÂ·hoselegalciddressis P.O. Box 7240 Denver, CO 80207 ofthe County of Denver and State of Colorado, of the second part: .i, That t he said pa rt ieS, f t he first part, fulÂ· alic l i n c 01 1~4 i (lerat ion o f TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration dial>hA , to the said part ieSof the first part in hand paid by said part y of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, haVegranted, bargained, sold and eonveyed, and by these presents do grant, batÂ·gain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said part y of tile second part,itS heirs and assigns for- ever, 811 the following described lot orvalÂ·cel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. al:,1 known as strect and number 514 N. Third Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 TOGE'l'HER with all and singular the heretlitaments :ind :ippurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise apper- litining, and thtâ€¢ reversion and revelÂ·Kions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the istate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said part leS of the first part, either in law or equity, of. in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. '1'0 11.AVE AND TO HOLI) the Kilid premises above batÂ·gained and described with the appurtenances, unto the said part ~ of the second part, itsheirs and assigns forever. Ancl the said part ies of the first part, fo i.them sei ves thRAF executors, and administrators, dci covenant, grant, b,11Â·gain, ancl agree to and with the said part y ti f the stÂ·cond part, ltS heirsand assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of thesiÂ· presents, they are wellseized ofthe premises al,(,veconveyed, asof good, sure, perfect, alisolute and 111(|tâ€¢ fe,Ls,1,leestate of inheritance, in law, m fee Kimple, :ind ha ve good right, full power and authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear fri,in all fornwr and otlwr grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments und ineumbrances of whatever kind of nature soever; EXCEPT general taxes of 1983 payable in 1984 and SUBJECT TO the rights as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at Page 2; Easements as reserved to the City of Aspen as set forth an instrument recorded in Book 253 at Page 664-all as recorded in the records of Pitkin County, Colorado. amithr above balÂ·gained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession ofthe said part y of the second part, its heirsand assigns:igain:t all and every person orpersons lawfully claiming or toclaim the whole or any part thereof, thes.nti part ies of thi. fiiÂ·st part :hall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER 1) EFENI). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the h.lid part ieSof the fitÂ·st patÂ·tha Ve hereuntoseltheirhan& and Wals thpility and year fii'Kt above written. ~talillÂ« 0 2. (SEAL) ' c.0924Â§~z=~_~C~*~4%~~-- -_(SEAL) <MARY L L WRIGHt' (SEAI,) STATE OF COLORA DO, SS. Count>-1,1 Pitkin The fortÂ·guing instrument was acknowledged be fore me this day of October 1.4 83 . by DAVID L. WRIGHT and MARY L. 0RIC}~ 11>Â·ccur.niiÂ»i,snexpires 5.~.p-lÂ·z~uloq.s-- 2.â‚¬1 /~~;~.~ hand and official seal. \ApkiESS: / AIR. _- Notary Public d&90/9 5 (61( No. 932 WARRANTY DEED.-For Photograph'.c Record- Brad ford Publi.hing, 5825 W. fth Ave., Lakewood, CO 80214 -(303) 233-6900 1-83 ~ \ -4 . ... ..1 ..-iÂ· 1. 0 . /.> f f EXHIBIT "A" A tract of land in the NEiSEN, Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner Lot 1, Block 40, Hallam's Addition, being a point 1017.31 ft. S.81Â°21'W from the Ek corner Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. (1954 Brass Cap) and 224.32 ft. N. 03Â°23'E from the city monument on the NE corner of Smuggler and North 3rd Street (1959 approved city plat); thence S.00Â°08'W. 103.38 feet along the East line of North 3rd Street; thence S. 75Â°09'11"E. 48.14 feet along the Northerly line of the alley in Block 40, to the Easterly line of Lot 2; thence N. 14Â°50'49"E. 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 2 to the NE corner of Lot 2; thence N.75Â°09'11"W. 74.40 feet along the Northerly line of Lots 1 & 2 to the point of beginning. Also a tract of land 30.0 feet long and 1.2 feet wide which tract is more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1 Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen; thence S. 75Â° 09'11"E. 18.14 feet to the true point of beginning being the common Southerly corner of Lots 1&2 of said block 40; thence S.75Â°09'11"E. 30.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 2 (said line being the Northerly line of the alley in rear of Lot 2 of said Block 40); thence S.14Â°50'49"W. 1.2 feet; thence N.75'09'11"W. 30.00 feet; thence N.14Â°50'49"E. 1.2 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. .. f MEMORANDUM To: Aspen City Council Thru: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office~~~ Re: First Reading: Landmark Designation - 514 N. 3rd St. and 1004 E. Durant St. Date: June 12, 1989 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of Ordinance (Series of 1989) on First Reading, which combines two Landmark Designations in one ordinance. Both applicants have applied for a $2,000 Designation Grant, which they are eligible for through Ordinance 42, Series of 1987. LOCATIONS: 514 N. 3rd St., Aspen 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1, Aspen APPLICANTS: 514 N. 3rd St. - Donald and Karen Ringsby 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1 - Sandra Lore HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: Both structures are rated "4" PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Both structures have received HPC and P&Z recommendations for designation approval; HPC - May 10, 1989, P&Z - June 6, 1989. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that both applications meet the criteria in Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: 514 N. 3rd St.: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake district" has long been considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation in a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End. .. t 1004 E. Durant: The Durant Avenue historic context has been lost overtime. The lone survivor of a once extremely built-out street, 1004 E. Durant would now be considered a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood. Dozens of one and two-story cottages lined Durant 100 years ago; it is amazing to find this cottage, now with its condominiumized addition and in such good condition, still surviving. Its preservation is extremely necessary due to this fact alone. Certainly the historic character of the neighborhood is gone; however, in the larger context of the East Aspen Townsite, 1004 E. Durant is an excellent example of Aspen's family lifestyle heritage. Standard F. Community Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: 514 N. 3rd St.: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and the addition of a wing. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. 1004 E. Durant: The classic components of an Aspen miner's cottage are the mainstay of this structure. The front porch, the cross gable roof form and pitch, fenestration, materials and chimney are all elements critical to preserve. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to read Ordinance (Series of 1989) on First Reading." "Move to approve Ordinance (Series of 1989) on First Reading." 2 .. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: memo.cc.514n3.1004ed 3 .. ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1989) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 514 NORTH THIRD STREET AND 1004 EAST DURANT STREET, #1, AS H, HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF THE LAND USE CODE. WHEREAS, Donald and Karen Ringsby, as owners of the real property described as 514 North Third Street (metes and bounds legal description attached), City and Townsite Of Aspen, Colorado; and Sandra Lore, as owner of the real property described as 1004 East Durant Street, #1, East 8' of Lot L, and the West 22' of Lot M, Block 47, East Aspen Townsite, have filed an application for historic landmark designation pursuant to Section 7-701 of the Land Use Code, and WHEREAS, the property at 514 N. 3rd St. was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "4"; and the property located at 1004 E. Durant St., Unit #1, was listed in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures on April 11, 1989, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "4", and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee recommended historic designation for both structures at a duly noticed public hearing on May 10, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended historic designation at a duly noticed public hearing on June 6, 1989; and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. 0 . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the property at 514 North Third Street, Aspen, (described by metes and bounds attached hereto), and the property at 1004 East Durant Street, E. 8' of Lot L, W. 22' of Lot M, Block 47, East Aspen Townsite, be granted H, Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the Planning Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said rezoning. Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion_ of this Ordinance is_ for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5 That a public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 2 .. day of , 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk ord.514n3.1004ed 3 /<* E NO?\ L.--=========z=2351 ir .P,Â· 1 /'P~-~~ic T:~~ â€¢ Aspen/PitkiU~anning Office (4915 To <01 I 1 ( [JUN 12 1 / Z~ \ 1989 ~ JU ' 2 130 sotfiral,4, street --..- u-L &16#' _- aspen,~Al# 81611 CO L NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE 10 FO RWARP JUN 1 3 -'9*4704 i//7 33-6-Â·-Â·Â»f---7 3- 9 0 0 R. C.r. trwa 1 t ti 924, L JU. 1, 12 -si \Â¢{.11??-3, f American Land Title Association Commitment - Modild 10/73 -YAW Mb# CA 1. A pr -ye-6.i* :1.-2+1-1], t. -'1~~~.~,~ A P~' A B,1. Pa" A-4. ' A 4.~ â€¢ 2 . A .,1. 1*' ..4,2.64 1 A-y)~~~: 1,1- ' .1~-' .1. P,~ A P.1 A.~ ,1,-'l,e .1 -'.1 .... Tr i -2*14=9.11 4.-Sti *--* .Â» I.~ 1= Â·.*1 74,9 1 p COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE 4 f $3' ISSUED BY A 'e 4, STEWART TITLE P i ~+I~: 14 GUARANTY COMPANY tty + I f ((C 11 49Â»,4 q.1 9 444{Ef ~AÂ»%5 A 4 1 %39% 4%2" Â»3 104= 4 4, 9. 9 . 101, ,(1 1/2 . 0 .+ 44 114 4 4%34 94 2%94 # 9 3(l ~ STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporatio?1â€¢~h[ein called the Company, for f Â¢ 4 C valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies oNNe insurance, as identified in C . ~ 1 Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as own<or mortgagee of the estate t.Â· 1 ': '11 1). b +1 or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule'40, upon payment of the 14: premiumsand charges therefor; all subject.to the provis~niof Schedules A and B and to the Conditions i' 14 8 ,~ and Stipulations hereof. 4 EVA G â„¢ f { ..9 epit (13 Â«./.6 a b. ' 4 This Commitment shall be effective only when the identi of the proposed Insured and the amount 11â‚¬ of the policy or policies committed for have been inserten Schedule A hereof by the Company, t + I 4 ' either at the time of the issuance of this~mmitment or by su equent endorsement. Â¢ L ). 4+ I 2 + This Commitment is preliminary to the~is~qce of such policy or policies of title insurance and all 4 + M li' Â·4 f 2 liability and obligations hereunder shall ceht AQ terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed fb~slyll issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the 1 1 Â£ 1 p ' f failure to issue such policÂ»Qr policies is not therault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be 3 1, - valid or binding until court~digned by an authorized officer or agent. 151 Iii 1 7 3 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ~Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to ~ ~ f S 1 1 become valid when countersignkbhan authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance 0 + with its By-Laws. This CommitmenNdeffective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date. " Â§1â‚¬. 49 i I 1 STEWART TITLE f rp. t*4 GUARANTY COMPANY ,. '16:~ (212Â«Â»0Â£4 2 â€¢ .7 1 4 4, Chairman of the Board President <ffk~~,:~ 4 '*0'Â·. 1908 ,Â·9~4 2 4 f a C i 5 4 .: . \Le/3#11111!~ 1~. 0 f 1 0 74 â‚¬ L 1 , -,6 :flal C *5 1# + f k. Sanclily 0.1 Contract ' S Â¢ f 1- f If 7 J * f ek> 11 .P hi f X 61 2 N : 1 , i 4 3,11'' (1 7 Â¢1 Kr.. I \, 2 -443*182~ ~0~2 - -L - 2.'- :=2413Â·Zjf'.41 Serial No. C-1601-0 2581 4 ' ~ Al Â©*'*61*441 2Â·v-:I~~+2&,fqrAfS~ 165 25M 5-83 Ib32 i.fUM-4-DJ) 1.-, 13&.r .-- 9 0-82 4 4-r %:A CS/ram .. SCHEDULE A Order Number: 11844 Commitment Number: 1. Effective date: September 26, 1983 at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount ol Insurance Premium A. ALTA Owner's Policy $412,500.00 $914.75 Proposed Insured: D. W. Ringsby Enterprises B. ALTA Loan Policy $212,500.00 100.00 Proposed Insured: Tax Certificate 5.00 Mary L. Wright and David L. Wright C. $ 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto ts at the effective date hereof vested in: Mary L. Wright and David L. Wright 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: A tract of land in the NE;<SE15, Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner Lot 1, Block 40, Hallam's Addition, being a point 1017.31 ft. S. 81Â°21'W from the E}5 corner Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. (1954 Brass Cap) and 224.32 ft. N. 03023'E from the city monument on the NE corner of Smuggler and North 3rd Street (1959 approved city plat); thence S. 00Â°08'W. 103.38 feet along the East line of North 3rd Street; thence S. 75'09'11" E. 48.14 feet along the Northerly line of the alley in Block 40, to the Easterly line of Lot 2; thence N. 14'50'49" E. 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 2 to the NE corner of Lot 2; thence N. 75'09'11"W. 74.40 feet along the Northerly line of Lots 1&2 to the point of beginning. Also a tract of land 30.0 feet long and 1.2 feet wide which tract is more partic- ularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1 Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen; thence S. 75Â°09'11"E. 18.14 feet to the true point of beginning being the common Southerly corner of Lots 1&2 of said Block 40; thence S.75Â°09'11" E 30.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 2 (said line being the Northerly line of the alley in rearÂ· of Lot 2 of said Block 40); thence S.14'50'49"W. 1.2 feet; thence N.75009'11"W. 30.00 feet; thence N. 14'50'49"E. 1.2 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 4677 Authorized Countersignature Page 2 STEP#11111 T "' ir'i' ir 1.. 1 1 1 1Ar, GUARANTY COMPANY 1652 (20M-4-83) .. SCHEDULE B - Section 1 Order Number: 11844 Commitment Number: Requirements The following are the requirements to be complied with: Item Ca) Payment to or for the account of tile grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-Wit: 1. Evidence satisfactory to Stewart Title Guaranty Company, furnished by the Office of the Director of Finance, City of Aspen, that the real estate transfer tax pursuant to city ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979, has been paid or that conveyance is exempt from said tax. 2. Deed from vested owner, vesting fee simple title in purchaser(s). 3. Deed of Trust from the Borrower to the Public Trustee for the use of the proposed lender to secure the loan. Page 3 STE;VANT TITLE 1653 GUARANTY COMPANY .. SCHEDULE B - Section 2 Exceptions Order Number: 11844 Commitment Number: The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Any and all unpaid taxea and assessments. 7. The effect of inclusion in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area. 8. The right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises, as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at page 2. 9. Easementa reserved to the City of Â· Aspen in Record of Proceedings, Ordinance No. 1 (Series of 1971) recorded February 16, 1971 in Book 253 at page 664. Exceptions numbered are hereby omitted. Page 4 STEWART TITLE 1654 (25M 3-83) GUARANTY COMPANY 0 -- CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. I f the proposed I nsured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements i Â· hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or ,1 create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In :~ no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy ~. or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the exclusions from coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY ~ Page 5 0 . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: 514 N. 3rd St. Public Hearing Date: June 6, 1989 LOCATION: 514 N. 3rd St., (legal description: metes and bounds) APPLICANT: Donald and Karen Rinbgsby APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the c. 1884 cottage at 514 N. 3rd St. A Landmark Designation grant of $2,000 is also being requested by the applicant, which will be granted by Council at second and Final reading of the Designation Ordinance. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: 11 4 " SUMMARY: This property will become Aspen's 94th designated historic landmark. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets the criteria in both Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake District" has long been considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation is a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End character. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or 4 . . sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and additional wing added. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation for 514 N. 3rd St. memo.pz.514N3 2 FIGURE m.z~ N /- \1 - . 1-,-Lu 4 - 98 1 O~Y OR. 19]IeftiC S AND STRUCTURES: ' 1.-/--- LEGEND -*- 4 . /1 designated , Exsaptigna!-28!gltm /.F , not yet designated O ~SPEN, COL | Egellent Structina I. designated â€¢ I -% 1~.- - not yet designated a -EPARE O IY TIE Al,ENUMrKIN PLAN,-3 FICE ... Notable Structurgi .. , designated e /. 100 1 not yet designated o 1 ..FEJ ' Contributio Structires 0 f O 200 400 I 9 \ 1mabsteetI 2 con,nercial core .. \ ,/ i A/~~h . HSTORIC DISTRICTS I NaLQQN~MEBAI]QN --- k n. V 7. 1 O - 3.west bleeker/hallam street 4.hallam lake 5.community church 6.lift 1 . V. i 1. R 3--- -.K M- N- O -O \ . 00- .. .. f -2 7 - 4-:*t~ Â· eA- t 2 ..u~ 4 in 9% j 79 â€¢ Â· --4 - r Imr-157-Lidlij .-. 11-W-7-Aâ€¢~IN .- ~4 â€¢Xh\ : ' ) . I . ..6 â€¢ U_*21 - -- -- / -~~~~~\A. U. uL~Â·il Â·-~ 'llint EiI~ 1 ;1; LIL Â·Â·-M' ; 3.- . - - lul I . 4 1 . ..i \ .. Â· \'1 Â·-[Imill:-i-iii" LU'lÂ®t IEII]Il} 01IN]Ilk 132[[1] -- .. f#ab rx - , NE[Ill: mnmm 17 , . I f - J -- -- - Â·vv:al â€¢Ii' Ill 1.4/ . 1 11 rr-Tn-ITr ITTITTTrÂ· 1 3.St. , L liM1111*I Â·, l Illl ...1-' â€¢ l..~4 -J u- . 4. i i itin:Ir :Fl nu dilkil I -- . lu I ~~~~L[]~Ll LglÂ·EP*. li. in -- - -:bl- . . -Od- â„¢-I-- i im~13 1 LM]Â£113 j .13*111! ul-ul -111'111.D; *.Il- I ;-- - Ww[[h rETum ' 1- - m-rTTTm *31] ~M-mmu, [IIWII[I MEN. - -li F 8 9 - 10 -I~:/.2 b 2/./.1 - oillmo â€¢ Uillitu | nTTITTTA' Â·M=-Am R /N &,50 9 TENWIT - U!1111114 , Â·- ....... <- Uk. 1 A + /0/ A . . Oy-,~ h 6,1 -4 2 - I . I , . . - - ullUI Al*h F -- r. 0 - i ~. . U- ~ I IN. 19 2 1 1 ~2/ A/Â»Sy 2.-2. 1 - 03 \ 7 ti t' <52 lovedo I am pty _ ESY'l te,Â¢Â¥Lpo f~ ar Cl < joÂ·t 505 Eli,r} ~ CL. l O G )or Â·1(1 14Â·te e. 1 Â· -- P 10 +1 c. Modek- rw t la , 61â‚¬ 7 2.14 0 1/ Ce ie d <3 1 4 2. d rd ~ g I 0 + 0 6,Â£, A f- 1<41 c-k) Lt 010 Â»w tA cpv, i c~ i ;rt (IJ Li~22Â° p-_E213) ./ Dll ) --- a.Â£29- .. *4 120:; !1 4 I. 3 0 ir LL ~rk.,+1 \J ; C i O V 1 CL 'VI~ , 4 64Â¥ eâ‚¬+ EFFi .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 514 N. 3rd St. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 6, 1989 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission in the Second Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application from Donald & Karen Ringsby requesting historic landmark designation for the property located at 514 North 3rd Street more specifically described as a tract of land in the NE1/4 SE1/4 of Sec. 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West, known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40, Hallam's Addition. For further information contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-5090. s/C. Welton Anderson, Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on May 18, 1989 City of Aspen Account pub.notice.514n3 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: 514 N. 3rd St. Date: May 10, 1989 LOCATION: 514 N. 3rd St., (legal description: metes and bounds) APPLICANT: Donald and Karen Rinbgsby APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the c. 1884 cottage at 514 N. 3rd St. A Landmark Designation grant of $2,000 is also being requested by the applicant, which will be granted by Council at second and Final reading of the Designation Ordinance. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: "4" SUMMARY: This property will become Aspen's 94th designated historic landmark. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearing at P&Z level), then first and second reading (public hearing at Final reading) of the designation ordinance by Council. The designation grant is expected to be approved by Council at Final reading as well. An application for HPC minor development review is expected to be submitted to the Planning Office within the next few weeks, which involves the rehabilitation of attic space into two bedrooms, requiring UBC flexibility by the Building Department for historic landmarks. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets the criteria in both Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake District" has long been .. considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation is a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End character. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is Of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and additional wing added. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC recommend for approval Landmark Designation for 514 N. 3rd St. memo.hpc.514n3 2 .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: 514 N. 3rd St. Date: May 10, 1989 LOCATION: 514 N. 3rd St., (legal description: metes and bounds) APPLICANT: Donald and Karen Rinbgsby APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the c. 1884 cottage at 514 N. 3rd St. A Landmark Designation grant of $2,000 is also being requested by the applicant, which will be granted by Council at second and Final reading of the Designation Ordinance. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: " 4 " SUMMARY: This property will become Aspen's 94th designated historic landmark. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearing at P&Z level), then first and second reading (public hearing at Final reading) of the designation ordinance by Council. The designation grant is expected to be approved by Council at Final reading as well. An application for HPC minor development review is expected to be submitted to the Planning Office within the next few weeks, which involves the rehabilitation of attic space into two bedrooms, requiring UBC flexibility by the Building Department for historic landmarks. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets the criteria in both Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake District" has long been 0. considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation is a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End character. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and additional wing added. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC recommend for approval Landmark Designation for 514 N. 3rd St. memo.hpc.514n3 2 .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: 514 N. 3rd St. Public Hearing Date: June 6, 1989 LOCATION: 514 N. 3rd St., (legal description: metes and bounds) APPLICANT: Donald and Karen Rinbgsby APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the c. 1884 cottage at 514 N. 3rd St. A Landmark Designation grant of $2,000 is also being requested by the applicant, which will be granted by Council at second and Final reading of the Designation Ordinance. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: " 4 " SUMMARY: This property will become Aspen's 94th designated historic landmark. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one ( 1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets the criteria in both Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: Clearly, the "Hallam Lake District" has long been considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic neighborhoods. This structure is located within the context of this neighborhood. Its preservation is a critical element in the continued integrity of the historic West End character. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or .. sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life styles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry." Photos indicate that from 1980 to today, the structure has been altered by an enclosed front porch and additional wing added. The original integrity of the simple 12/12 pitch cross gabled roof, projecting front gable bay, chimneys, clapboard and gable peak shingles exists. This structure embodies the small scale miner's cottage style that is indicative in Aspen and speaks to our heritage. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation for 514 N. 3rd St. memo.pz.514N3 2 , tkimil"ill@,111111111111:.,1111111110,ii;ittilifili#,#di il]Ililitulullilillillillitil ifil It 9.b .1*416'>:10 ... l' i i . , --Â·.. -- 7 -i ~ 11-iÂ»-:.-19/61-~ ' 1 *-Â·-- --i-~~:,-ili~jill,I~~11=-3 1- -/i 11 1 4 ./ Â· |,1 I C - 1 0 tÂ·:PitÂ·. - â€¢ .,Â·-~e,rj...0 --,2,.'41,<,L J - ------7- *,u -/'//#'&//Ill'- 11, ' i -..........#.... 0/,497//~//////bc/ZET224 4\1* ' \F.â‚¬9\ /â€ž74"Il./1/'ll//7 4.:ht,t--al</344/Â£% F /. .., 15,% i.:'9"Â¥. .. pri 127Â· ..Mi >h â€¢ur-MÂ· ./ . ./ Â· , 0 1 I + 0 42% 2:4 + t Â· r.1.kle y. ...4- .- - Gi?*Di- - -' 4, # - I lii,il'. lk-i'!+tv.t. E- 101011.Ep - . t. t - *2 1,111111111111111111111111111111111 4, *Mwl 22â‚¬ 9 . - . - - -- , , , 1 : dib .1 4 L Aâ€¢,LZE'~': 74.*0 4. 10*. Â·*Â«t:raâ‚¬1,/13 1 Â·-ret 1 .. . CS/ram - . SCHEDULE A Order Number: 11844 Commitment Number: 1. Effective date: September 26, 1983 at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount of Insurance Premium $412,500.00 $914.75 A. ALTA Owner's Policy Proposedlnsured: D. W. Ringsby Enterprises B. ALTA Loan Policy s 212,500.00 100.00 Proposed Insured: Tax Certificate 5.00 Mary L. Wright and David L. Wright S C. 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein Is fee simple and title thereto is at the ettect,ve date hereof vested in: Mary L. Wright and David L. Wright 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as lollows A tract of land in the NE!<SE4, Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. known as Lots 1 & 2, Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner Lot 1, Block 40, Hallam's Addition, being a point 1017.31 ft. S. 81'21'W from the Ek corner Sec. 12, T.lOS., R85W., 6P.M. (1954 Brass Cap) and 224.32 ft. N. 03'23'E from the city monument on the NE corner of Smuggler and North 3rd Street (1959 approved city plat); thence S. 00Â°08'W. 103.38 feet along the East line of North 3rd Street; thence S. 75'09'11" E. 48.14 feet along the Northerly line of the alley in Block 40, to the Easterly line of Lot 2; thence N. 14'50'49" E. 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 2 to the NE corner of Lot 2; thence N. 75'09'11"W. 74.40 feet along the Northerly line of Lots 1&2 to the point of beginning. Also a tract of land 30.0 feet long and 1.2 feet wide which tract is more partic- ularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1 Block 40 of the unrecorded Hallam'a Addition to the City of Aspen; thence S. 75'09'11"E. 18.14 feet to the true point of beginning being the common Southerly corner of Lots 1&2 of said Block 40; thence S.75'09'11" E 30.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 2 (said line being the Northerly line of the alley in rearÂ· of Lot 2 of said Block 40); thence S.14'50'49"W. 1.2 feet; thence N.75'09'11"W. 30.00 feet; thence N. 14'50'49"E. 1.2 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. d PAC/Vi- Authorized Countersignature Page 2 STET#'ART T I '1'LE GUARANTY COMPANY 1652 ROMÂ·4 83) .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Minor Development: 514 N. 3rd St. Date: June 12, 1989 LOCATION: 514 N. 3rd St., (metes and bounds description), City and Townsite of Aspen APPLICANT: Donald and Karen Ringsby APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Minor Development approval for the installation of two principal facade dormers to add space in the attic for bedrooms, and other minor window alterations. ZONING: R-6, Landmark Designation is scheduled for final reading before council on July 10. RATING: "4" DESIGNATION NOTES: Landmark Designation is required due to the parking constraints for the two new attic bedrooms created. Ordinance 16, Sec. 2, Paragraph 2, provides for the HPC to waive on-site parking requirements for landmarks if the parcel is unable to contain the number of spaces required. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicable Guidelines are found in Section VI. Residential Buildings - Renovation and Restoration, beginning on page 47. The Development Review Standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code, and are reviewed below, with staff's comments following: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: This miner's cottage has received a significant addition (south wing) since it was originally inventoried in 1980. The original porch has been enclosed and a duplicate "enclosed porch" added in the new addition. A significantly altered detached carriage house is located at the alley as well. The primary 3rd street (west) elevation is receiving the most significant changes, including two small gable roof dormers and a round window in the primary gable face. In .. our review of other structures in the West End, we find the dormers are not inappropriate on this structure, and are necessary to provide light, ventilation, egress and headroom to the proposed attic bedrooms. (While similar dormers would be considered inappropriate on carriage houses, we find that the dormers proposed do not alter the overall character of the primary structure.) We are not as comfortable with the application of a round gable face window on this primary facade. The applicant has stated this window is necessary for light into the attic bedrooms; we recommend that the original gable shingles remain wholly in tact and that this gable end not receive a window. Another window, oval in shape, is proposed in the north elevation gable end, an alternative shape for this west elevation window. The elaborate Smith-Elisha House, (Queen Anne) contains two large round gable end windows, which is an appropriate application on that facade. Round gable end windows of this nature are generally not found in vernacular cottages. We do find, however, that the round window's size is scaled appropriately, should the HPC approve the alteration. The north, south and east elevations are the least visible, screened considerably by mature trees. The changes proposed on these elevations (deck railing, small gable peak oval window, tri-window with multi-panes and 3 flat roof skylights), are cosmetic in nature, and do not impact the historic character of the structure, in our opinion. The skylight application meets the criteria in the Guidelines. (Please refer to attached drawings.) 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds the application meets this standard. Numerous structures in this immediately West End neighborhood have received alterations similar in nature. 3. Standard. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of the designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: We find that the cultural value of this structure is in its small scale, which is not being altered with this proposal. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 2 .. Response: Please refer to staff's comments to Standard #1 regarding the dormers. We find that the multi-pane windows proposed for the dormers are small and scaled appropriately; the even placement of the dormers on either side of the front gable face does not diminish the structure's architectural integrity, in our opinion. We would like the applicant to consider the elimination of the round gable peak window on the primary west elevation gable peak, as we find the original architectural integrity Of the cut shingles to be appropriate and should be retained. The other elevation changes proposed are not easily visible, and do not diminish the architectural integrity of the structure, in our opinion. PARKING: Two new attic bedrooms are being created, requiring one on-site parking space each, provided space is available on site (please refer to site plan attached). Ordinance 16 provides the HPC the flexibility to waive this requirement on designated landmarks if adequate surface space is not available on the parcel, provided the applicant has made every effort to provide adequate parking on site. The applicant has met with the Zoning Officer to discuss the site constraints. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Minor Development approval for the application for 514 N. 3rd St., waiving the parking requirements as allowed in Ordinance 16, Series of 1989. We further recommend that the applicant consider eliminating the proposed west elevation round gable peak window. memo.hpc.514n3md 3