Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.520 E Durant Ave.HPC037-98PN: 273-782-22006 Case HPC037-98 520 E. Durant.Minor HPC .»14 60% 80-99 tp 7 0 0 PARCEL ID:|273-782-22006 DATE RCVD: |10/15/98 # COMES:|1 ~ CASE NO|HPC037-98 1 CASE NAME(ElE Snowboarding Minor HPC PLNR:~Amy Guthrie ~ PROJ ADDR:|520 E. Durant - ~ CASE TYP:|Minor HPC STEPS:j OWN/APP: D&E Snowboard Sh ADR~520 E. Durant C/S/Z: ~Aspen, CO 81611 PHN:~920-2337 ~ REPlAspen Design Works ADR~P·O. Box 3757 C/S/Z:|Aspen, CO 81612 PHN1963-8160 FEES DUE:|120 (hpc) FEES RCVD1120 STAT: r- REFERRALS~ REF< BY| ' DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:l- 10 L~*,l-(af . CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS] PZ: CLOSED :14*2 BY: 1-2. 15 *-- ' '.r BOA: DRAC: A PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK.PG}:| ADMIN: Rp,/44-6~- r ¥ .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Interim Community Development Director~16 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer r - RE: 520 E. Durant Street- minor review DATE: October 28, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant, D&E Snowboards, is taking over the spaces formerly occupied by Geranium's and Sunshine and Rex and Doris and proposes minor alterations to the exterior of the storefronts. The subject building is not historic but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: D&E Snowboards, represented by Aspen Design Works. LOCATION: 520 E. Durant Avenue, Ajax Mountain Building, lower courtyard level. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to make exterior changes to the existing storefronts. These proposed changes are: replacing wood doors with .. metal doors on Cafe Ink and the former Rex and Doris space, removing the wooden door on the former Geranium's and Sunshine space and replacing it with two metal doors with a sidelight, and enlarging windows on the former Geranium's and Sunshine space. Staff has no concerns with the proposal. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The changes proposed will have no impact on the neighborhood, because there are no historic resources in this immediate vicinity and the shop does not have a very direct relationship to the street. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereo£ Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: • Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. • Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. r ¥ .. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the new entry doors and window changes for 520 E. Durant Street, D&E Snowboards shop, as proposed." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated October 14,1998 B. Application .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name I)* m C.ww6041 9ky 2. Project location •52£7 /EF' PURd (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning . 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name address and phone number 9/8 9/0&&/8 5AA,p 520 E Ov'.It 1614",8, 120 - 253 gz 1*Rep resentative's name, address, and phone number 400 Of•,11 Dne, ~t ; Po 17'57 Asp•t ;80 163-T<66 ' 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD ~' Minor HPC Stream Margin _ Final PUD - Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization _ Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. DescMption of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) ,20~i/.*WES 9. Description of development application- 8<.4 .PS'/2'>~27/ftk»di - MW wwd- 11 2/041.' ,* sul'ht,4141 4,1'Wit'/1- 10. Have you completed and attached the following? € Attachment 1- Land use application form X Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form X Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 41(6 L 1 93 llllllll ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, OCTOBER 28. 1998 Chairperson Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Roger Moyer, Heidi Friedland, Suzannah Reid, Mary Hirsch, Christie Kienast, Maureen MacDonald, Susan Dodington and Jeffrey Halferty. MOTION: Mary moved to approve the minutes of Sept. 23, 1998; second by Heidi. All in favor, motion carried. 520 E. Durant - D&D Snowboards Amy Guthrie, planner indicated to the board that the building is not historic but it is located in the historic district. They propose to change some entry doors and window changes and staff recommends approval. Sworn in was Mark Turkin. Mark relayed that there are three store fronts and the new occupants want to put in a new double glass door in the center space and update the other doors and windows to improve the space. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the new entry doors and window changes to 520 E. Durant Street D&E Snowboard shop as proposed; second by Susan. All in favor, motion carried 7-0. Christie voted and Maureen did not. 514 N. THIRD - Continued public hearing from Oct. 14th Amy Guthrie, planner informed the board that the agenda item is in regards to a shed that was built without a permit on the carriage house. A site visit occurred and at the last meeting the Board suggested a change to the shed so that it doesn't dump snow into the neighbors property. Gray Ringsby, the architect for the project worked out the design with the neighbors. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Sworn in were Gray Ringsby and Martin Block. 1 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: bt-cs•, w boad (Rop Address: €2.0 € Dur..1- -All®14 j do Zone district: di Lot size: - Existing FAR: r Allowable FAR: - Proposed FAR: Ali GWRAw Existing net leasable (commercfaly - Proposed net leasable (commercial): /1/# /1**iyr Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: A/0 £14*Hy£ Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existjng maximum height: Princioal bida: - Accesorv blda: Proposed max. height: Princioal blda: - Accessorv blda: Proposed % of demolition: - Existing number of bedrooms: - Proposed number of bedrooms: - Existing on-site parking spaces: - On-site parking spaces required: - Setbacks Existjng: Minimum required: Proposed: Front. Front: Front: Rear Rear: Rear Combined Combined Combined Front/rear. FronUrear: Fronurear Side: S ide: Side: Side. Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides. Sides: Sides- Existing nonconformities or encroachments: ~/Rt Variations requested: /'RE (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program. parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) - October 14,1998 To whom it may concern Aspen Design Works Inc. is authorized to represent D&E Snowboard Shop for the remo¢lei ofitS store located at 520 E. Durant #107, #108, #109 Sincerely, Eric Bergstrom Owner I)&E Snowboard Shop .. TO: Historical Preservation Commission 14 October 1998 FROM: D&E Snowboard Shop Ajax Mtn. Bldg. 520 E Durant St #107,8,9,10 Aspen, Co 81611 970-920-2337 Representative: ADW Inc. PO Box 3757 Aspen, CO 81612 970-963-8160 970-963-6145 fx. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION: The following changes are proposed for the D&E Snowboard Shop storefront elevation located at the address listed above: 1) Removal of existing wood-frame doors to be replaced with equivalent in metal- frame on units 107 and 109. 2) Removal of existing wood-framed door on unit 108 to be replaced with two, ( 3'00" X 6'08" ) metal-frame, full glass doors, with 16" full-height side-light. 3) Enlarging of existing windows on unit 108 from 4'6" to 6'0" height. 4 E- ret No,16 of Neg Blaj. EDURANT- ST IDNU {Uld - /9#»44% j 1 i Dfa 1 A»* Mt.. &&. -t~' 51.0 a pur.MV - i J ALUEr -- lf' - ,-. f. ODDPER- AVE 113 V /trl ¥9 S ~ STEPHEN J. MARCUS ~ RO. Box 1709 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (970) 925-7615 (970) 920-3693 FAx October 13, 1998 To The City Of Aspen To The Historical Preservation Society RE: Spaces # 107/109/109, Ajax Mountain Building, 520 East Durant Street, Aspen, Colorado. To Whom It May Concern: The Ajax Mountain Associates, Ltd., (Landlord) gives consent to D&E Snowboards (Tenant) to remodel the above numbered spaces in the Ajax Mountain Building, as per attached sketch. Very truly yours, XZT~ MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES, LTD. , 1 CLU.La Brodirf AS& Property Manager Enc. / I r . -=72 24 . I* a 5il --.--- -IC Z 3 9*lu Ill * R -Sb gi p E.0 0%~ r):2: u.=z -4 Up[1 aspen design works FULE Snowboard Shop J., £54#Fr /117 Po box 3757 aspen, co 81612 Aspen, Co 81611 520 El)urant St. # 109,110,111 AXISTINS[CONIPITIONS telephone 970 963 8160 facsimile 970 963 6145 97()-92()-2337 . -11Agl -34 M 01 114 03=1-23 019 N O 11¥A-119 H 1-0 0 N :Red *FICAL -3 51 4 04 f KERI 1 Z D<2 E 1 ) 4. O \ 0 - X ,7 ,4 6 1j 9 -A r 4% Utu ispen design works D&E Snowboard Shop J." 520 E Durant St. # 109,110,111 FROPGMI) qu~efRONT- Po box 3757 as p en, Co 81612 Aspen, Co 81611 ione 970 963 8160 facsimile 970 963 6145 970-920-2337 1/1-'/ =- 1 ' Ou AISTI 601614 Lowfc' To UNW -3911F1 31*11 -1019, g]IM *91 - (imimy/J~ .VIA .UIZ 4,1 1 /7,1 0 v 1-, -WOOd "11,97:ff 1~1110NA~(N~~%~ , 6 0 =7.-4 3R 5 76 - =C 23 9-1 01-4. . * a 73 i f %-L= 01\ C -47-- - ==:40 -6 q spen design works DkE Snowboard Shop I. £59*EPT /119 520 E Durant St. # 109,110,11' AXMTI N<# CONDITIONS Po box 3757 aspen, co 81612 Aspen, Co 81611 ne 970 963 8160 facsimile 970 963 6145 970-920-2337 74' = \' 04 N 0 I.LVA-319 H 1~d 0 N St.4 041 X )(ad -294 - -*712*6 1 Ngy J 0<2 E -4 ... 1 /1 f>~ g -\.li Ill A r, 4 g e.1 ED 1 9 bS .,A r S\ 1% Flu aspen design works DkE Snowboard Shop J. 520 E Durant St, # 109,110,111 MPR* qt@FANT- Po box 3757 aspen, co 81612 Aspen, Co 81611 ione 970 963 8160 facsimile 970 963 6145 970-920-2337 1/1-4 -110 U .VIA .0 12 ..1 1 ..11 00,9 liv 1¥7 „vl. 0 7 1 8 AISTIN -lziNW -NM01 11-141 go g]/M *91· 641%g 42994 kalM:1 NW\A ~ -90 0 0 ,1,9 1,0,2 713000 MgN