Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.520 E Hyman Ave.HPC020-00- 2737-182-15-004 HPC020-00 ~ ~ Worldlink Cafe Minor HPC -~ 520 E. Hyman Ave. 4 \ Bay H As-9 H 1 - 1 1 pd 4 1 L= .. CASE NUMBER HPC020-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-15004 CASE NAME Worldlink Caf@ Minor HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 520 E. Hyman Ave. PLANNER Fred Jarman CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Christian Hedleberg REPRESENTATIVE Same DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/26/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. #36-2000 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 8/18/00 BY J. Lindt .. 0 - PARCEL ID: ~2737-182-15004 DATE RCVD: ~7/12/00 # COPIES:1 ~ CASE NO HPC020-00 ; 1-m„.m.„mm- CASE NAME:~Worldlink Cafe Minor HPC PLNR: 18,•Ol 34,)961 4 PROJADDR:~520 E. Hyman Ave. CASE TYP:IMinor HPC STEPS:1 OWN/APP: Christian Hedleberg L ADR~826 Vine St. ~ C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 1 PHN:1 REP:|Same ADM Cls/Z:l PHN1 FEES DUE: None-incorporate in P& Z Dep FEES RCVD: STAT: r-3 REFERRALSI Lmmm.m· --- m.-mu.~ REF:~ m BY 1 DUE: MTG DATE REVBODY PH NOTICED r l r DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ 772,6/~) J REMARKS~ CITY COUNCIL: . ' . pz: 1-11[y. Da€'34' 'u-200© BOA: ~, DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: A ao~UD,i - . ..1.,+ / I - I ..../,m' - I Illill mi mi lilli lilli 11""1Illibul lilli lili lili 445980 08/10/2000 10:29A RESOLOII/DAVIS SILVI y 1 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION NO. 36_, (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-182-15-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Christian Hedberg, requests minor HPC approval for exterior alterations to 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Historic Overlay Zone District: and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 1 111111 !141111111 lilli 11111111111 lili ll'Il lili lili . 445980 08/10/2000 10: 29A RESOLU1'r DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WHEREAS, Fred Jarman, in his staff report dated July 26,2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 26,2000. the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a unanimous vote of 6 to 0. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the July 26,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agrees upon this approval to replace the proposed modified window with the original existing window upon termination of lease or change of use; 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff; 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless othenvise amended by other conditions; and 5. That prior to the purchase and installation of the subject window, the applicant shall present technical information to an HPC Monitor illustrating window type and installation method to be used. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of July, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant CAty Attorney . 1111111 lilli 111111 lilli lilli 11111.1111111111111 lili . 445980 08/10/2000 10:29A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzan~r- Reid, Ch ir ATTEST: V r ti~ hi , 1 A ££i~- 1/34,4A1/EA-8--#d iZNg'it-Ciani,Chiefiieputy Clerk 1 -I CL) 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods. Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson. Deputy Planning DirectorJAgQ FROM: Fred Jarman. Planner 55/ RE: Worldlink Caft- Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: July 26.2000 1 ·v _-1 ~- 2. exsiting window specs. window /.2--a=.c-Y:--- adiuslment. 16- le 3 99.5- E .12 1 07 n - 1 24 1 Front view of Cafd with arrow pointing to window Sketch showing what the proposed window ' proposed to be remodeled. remodel willlook like. SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to make minor exterior alterations to 520 East Hyman Avenue. which is located in the Historic Overlay Zone District. APPLICANT: Christian Hedberg and James Guest. Owners /Representatives. LOCATION: 520 East Hyman Avenue. City and Townsite of Aspen. STAFF COMMENTS Staff feels discussion about this modification should include three recommendations. First. in order to maintain continuity between the two street facing windows. if the applicant u ishes to construct a vertically sliding double hung window scheme. the applicant must also do the same to the opposite window to maintain this continuity. Second. staff recommends an alternative to the first recommendation to allow the applicant to modify the one proposed wine-ow and place a matching temporary horizontal mutton in the exact location on the opposite window to indicate a simulated divided light (double hung design.) Included as part of this second recommendation. the applicant shall 1 ' 1 .. also be required to replace the original window upon termination of their lease or change in use which necessitated the window modification. Third, staff recommends an alternative to the proposed vertically sliding window scheme whereby the applicant construct a "easement window" which will swing open in full. Staff feels this suggested alternative would allow the applicant to achieve the "walk-up service" window function while maintaining a uniform front fagade. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the review standards are met and recommends that the proposal for 520 East Hyman Avenue be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agrees upon this approval to replace the proposed modified window with the original existing window upon termination of lease or change of use; 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff; 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; and 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series 2000 of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission approving an application by the Worldlink Caft for minor development for exterior alterations to 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado." EXHIBITS A. Findings for a Minor Development B. Application C. Resolution No. , Series of 2000 2 Exhibit A MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that §11 of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a, The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The project involves one minor alteration to the property, which affects one street facing storefront window. The building, originally constructed in 1987, has a front fagade, which includes two large windows with kick plates. The applicant wishes to replace the existing lower portion of the left window with a vertical sliding window intended to serve as an outside walk up service window for the Cafd. Staff feels that even though the building has no historic value, its fagade contains elements of an historical nature. Staff indicates that the two street facing windows should match in design. Changing only one window will create a mismatched storefront design detracting from the existing uniform design. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not affect the character of the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: There are no historical structures located on the parcel and no historic structures abut the property. Therefore, the project does not impact the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. 3 .. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This structure is not an historic structure; however it contains elements of an historic design nature regarding the front street facing faGade with respect to uniform display window design on the street elevation. Staff feels the proposed development is a minor impact to the architectural character of the Caft front in that it might create an inconsistent window design not only with its opposite window but also with the adjacent two businesses, which contain the same window design. However, staff also feels this modification would not detract from pedestrian interest along the street. Additionally, the headers and sills will not change as a result of the window modification. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: > Approve the application as submitted. > Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. > Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) > Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 4 0 E ~64 8 World Link Caf6 520 E. Hyman Ave. Phone 970 544 0001 Fax 970 544 0006 To Whom It May Concern: Building change order for front left hand window. My understanding is that the building 520E.Hyman Ave. is only 13 years old and is not in a historical building, however is in the historical area of the city. We are proposing a building change only to the window, which is currently a solid double glazed window. We have a 5 year lease on the sight and would like to remove this window and replace it with a downward sliding window that will be in the same design and taste of the building. This will be replaced with the original window on the completion of the leases. The propose for this is to have a walk up service counter so the customer will not be affected with the congestion inside the building. This will not affect the side walk and traffic flow of people. Please see the attached diagram of the sight and building change. Kind regards World Link Caft Christian Hedberg Co owner .. World Link Cafe 520 e.Hyman ave Aspen co. Building change order Front window left hand side take out ar with sliding down window. exsiting window specs. window adjustment. 16" 16" 1 1. 1 -.- 17' 99.5" slide down fe ' window 1__- 1 -. . . - / 1. U _2.52 & .l ."1----2-U-Z '-- 6 " - - ./ I. /1 1 1-, f \ h. ': - - \7'M- c- E-, a=- · . , *- ' ./Le & w 0 - 1 0 1,* 11 # 3/,47..7 4: 3 1 3 E 0 4 4 i I I , . 4/ .. ' Exhibit C RESOLUTION NO. -, (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-182-15-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Christian Hedberg, requests minor HPC approval for exterior alterations to 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Historic Overlay Zone District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Fred Jarman, in his staff report dated July 26,2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 26,2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located 520 East Hyman Avenue, Lot _, Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the July 26,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agrees upon this approval to replace the proposed modified window with the original existing window upon termination of lease or change of use; 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff; 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of July, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney .. Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods. Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director.i,~~ FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner ;:~' RE: Worldlink Cafd- Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: July 26,2000 i I 1 · window adiustment. ¥Biting window specs. , '1 :.. : /: .LI 16- 18» - 24 T f i 1 , 99.5' 11 i 2 , 0 i [ slide down < -. 03'2 ~ window , I .i °>'r//.9,4 -t. --C, le I •t-'~ ' 1 . +11--4-41 I: t ·9& ~,/ ,~,~' Front view of Caft with arrow pointing to window Sketch showing what the proposed window proposed to be remodeled. remodel will look like. 729 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to make minor exterior alterations '~ to 520 East Hyman Avenue, which is located in the Historic Overlay Zone District. V */f APPLICANT: Christian Hedberg and James Guest, Owners /Representatives. LOCATION: 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen. STAFF COMMENTS &012 AD. Staff feels discussion about this modification should include three recommendations. First, in order to maintain continuity between the two street facing windows, if the l ° applicant wishes to construct a vertically sliding double hung window scheme, the 9 ' applicant must also do the same to the opposite window to maintain this continuity. ~4|~~'~''3 Second, staff recommends an alternative to the first recommendation to allow the applicant to modify the one proposed window and place a matching temporary horizontal mutton in the exact location on the opposite window to indicate a simulated divided light (double hung design.) Included as part of this second recommendation, the applicant shall * 6,·, op..tu Adx jrlr' P .AA-t.-4™tr, ~ 47 - 4 BAL .1 i-6-,VA.·C-' 1 k j/h i A W, 21 J/C,Jk# 4. k 91- 6 MA vr#XY A,fB~k., 04 + ic,4.·+- ·ik,«b ~€'S- 3FIt=LA . 4 .. also be required to replace the original window upon termination of their lease or change in use which necessitated the window modification. Third, staff recommends an alternative to the proposed vertically sliding window scheme whereby the applicant construct a "easement window" which will swing open in full. Staff feels this suggested alternative would allow the applicant to achieve the "walk-up service" window function while maintaining a uniform front &wade. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the review standards are met and recommends that the proposal for 520 East Hyman Avenue be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agrees upon this approval to replace the proposed modified window with the original existing window upon termination of lease or change of use; 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff; 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; and 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions 5- 1--1- ¥ BAN)-2 ».1-1 NI-¥11 480# 1. 6 RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series 2000 of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission approving an application by the Worldlink Cafd for minor development for exterior alterations to 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado." EXHIBITS A. Findings for a Minor Development B. Application C. Resolution No. , Series of 2000 ./ .. ... I. -'. I . 1. ..2 2 .. ; I ,. , ...7,6 , a '.F '. .. Exhibit A MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The project involves one minor alteration to the property, which affects one street facing storefront window. The building, originally constructed in 1987, has a front faGade, which includes two large windows with kick plates. The applicant wishes to replace the existing lower_artion of the left window with_a vertical sliding window intended to serve as an outside walkeice-windmi-for-the-Eafi. Staff feels that even though the building has no historic value, its faGade contains elements of an historical nature. Staff indicates that the two street facing windows should match in design. Changing only one window will create a mismatched storefront design detracting from the existing uniform design. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not affect the character of the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: There are no historical structures located on the parcel and no historic structures abut the property. Therefore, the project does not impact the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. 3 .. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This structure is not an historic structure; however it contains elements of an historic design nature regarding the front street facing fa™le with respect to uniform display window design on the street elevation. Staff feels the proposed development is a minor impact to the architectural character of the Caft front in that it might create an inconsistent window design not only with its opposite window but also with the adjacent two businesses, which contain the same window design. However, staff also feels this modification would not detract from pedestrian interest along the street. Additionally, the headers and sills will not change as a result of the window modification. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: > Approve the application as submitted. 1 Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) > Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 4 0 E A:64 *3 World Link Caf6 520 E. Hyman Ave. Phone 970 544 0001 Fax 970 544 0006 To Whom It May Concern: Building change order for front left hand window. My understanding is that the building 520E.Hyman Ave. is only 13 years old and is not in a historical building, however is in the historical area of the city. We are proposing a building change only to the window, which is currently a solid double glazed window. We have a 5 year lease on the sight and would like to remove this window and replace it with a downward sliding window that will be in the same design and taste of the building. This will be replaced with the original window on the completion of the leases. The propose for this is to have a walk up service counter so the customer will not be affected with the congestion inside the building. This will not affect the side walk and traffic flow of people. Please see the attached diagram of the sight and building change. Kind regards World Link C aft Christian Hedberg Co owner .. World Link Cafe 520 e.Hyman ave Aspen co. Building change order Front window left hand side take out ar with sliding down window. exsiting window specs. window adjustment. 16" 16" 1 1. 1 17' 99.5- slide down 1-0 , Window 1-_- .. 1.wiwi Ii'"S. 2.22:~ U 12*44444*U:=26.2£=1&< 4 €7, 2 - I 1. -12 -1 _,2-=32 -=z f.'_......2--2-1 n : 3 1 0 W /J A Zic--1/4-- t C -.*-.- 9* . - .. 4 .- 9 FC>Pe'94 69 1 AL,Le WV dc 5 13 ./.4-Il---- . h.-4 t -7,71. 1-- ,\ t }t } 1~1 '11 'I''I.lt 1 > .. Exhibit C RESOLUTION NO. 3 6, (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-182-15-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Christian Hedberg, requests minor HPC approval for exterior alterations to 520 East Hyman Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Historic Overlay Zone District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and .. WHEREAS, Fred Jarman, in his staff report dated July 26, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 26,2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: s tr,-14 5,3 That minor development for the property located 520 East Hyman Avenue, 64--*, -Subelivisien, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the July 26,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agrees upon this approval to replace the proposed modified window with the original existing window upon termination of lease or change of use; 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff; 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of July, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 4. .. Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. Havman Ave, Foot path Garden bed Court paid walk through path to other 40 shops feet Merander Galleries I allep ~//< ~ ,Proposed way World Link Cafe window change This windowwill be replaced to the origional window atthe compleation of business al atthis sight and we E willing to sign a contract stating this. This change is not significant change and will i believe inhance the apperance of the building. 6 15 - 21 0 ... 934, 0 010/ 4-3 4 . 0*,0 - MI -0 1 2, jo f «117 City of Aspen 04* '1 14 0-7-- A,1 5 Li.--- 6114 . 5-4 T-3 1323A To: Christian Hedberg From: Fred Jarman, Planner Fax: 544.0006 Pages: 3 including cover Phone: 544.0001 Date: 6/15/00 Re: Code language and process Notes CC: £ Urgent £ For Review C] Please Comment C] Please Reply O Please Recycle • Comments: Christian, As promised, you will find attached important code language regarding Noticing prior to the public hearings, which will be both Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z). Also attached is the application for the Historic Preservation Review. We apologize for this added process as we discovered with further review of your business location that you are located in the Historic District Overlay as well as being in the Commercial Core District. Any exterior structural changes need to be reviewed before the Historic Preservation Commission. This, of course, requires an additional $480.00 application deposit. Also a Minor HPC Review (which this is) requires 10 day posting before the meeting. You don't need to complete "Attachment #2" in this application. Also, we can get you in front of the HPC on July *.which is the Wed. before your P&Z hearing. I will take you to both public hearings. *04 In order to do the mailing for your notices, you will need to come down to City Hall to the Information Department on the first floor and get a list of the names of the property owners within 300 feet of your business which costs $50 I think. However you will be able to use the same list for both notice mailings for HPC and P&Z so you only need one list. 1 Noticing for P&Z requires posting your property 5 days before the hearing (or beginning on 7/13) and a mailing out 15 days prior to the hearing (or on July 3rd). 1 Noticing for HPC requires posting your property 10 days before the hearing (or beginning on 7/2) and a mailing out 15 days prior to the hearing (or on June 27th). Now, the most important thing is to get this HPC application back to me as soon as possible along with the info from the land use review I gave you earlier. That way I can review them r . ~ June 15,2000 • J and get them into the necessary Commissioner packets for the PHC and the P&Z. Failure to do this will set you back a lot because you will lose your place on these public hearing agendas. You don't want that to happen. Give me a call if you have any questions. Good luck. Fred 920.5102 • Page 2 .. E. Public notice. 1. General. Whenever a notice of a public hearing is required, notice shall be provided to the public, pursuant to the terms of this Section. 1. Content of notice. Every notice shall include the name and address of the applicant, the type of development application sought, date, time and place of the hearing, the address and legal description of the subject property if applicable, a summary of the development application under consideration, and identification of the decision-making body conducting the hearing and such other information as may be required to fully apprise the public of the nature of the application. 3. Manner Of notice. Every notice shall be given in one or more of the following manners, as specified in this Title for each type of development: a. Publication Of notice. Publication of notice shall be provided by the applicant or the Community Development Department at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing through publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen. b. Posting Of notice. Posting of notice shall be made by the applicant, who shall obtain a copy of the form from the Community Development Department. The notice shall be posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, by posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the property subject to the development application. The sign shall be made of suitable, waterproof materials, shall be not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and shall be composed of letters not less than one inch in height. c. Mailing of notice. Mailing of notice shall be made by the applicant, who shall obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department. The mailing shall contain that information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2). At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice shall be sent by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail, or hand delivered, to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice shall be sent by first class, postage pre- paid U.S. mail or hand delivery to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. e. Rezoning or text 27«gdment. Wheneverthedfficial zoning district map is in any way to be changed or ain2teddupider#@H6-or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this 3;21440 be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this 13!$-·@MrGIctment oft?ief land use regulation, or otherwise, .. , ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Application Package Contents Following is an application for minor development review at HPC. Included in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 3. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application 4. Attachment 4- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application to HPC 5. Attachment 5- Applicable review standards on which HPC will base its decision 6. Attachment 6- General summary of the HPC review process 7. Attachment 7- Definition of minor development To submit a complete application, fill out Attachments 1 and 2, include all items listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appropriate review process and submission requirements can be discussed. In addition, other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission, which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also recommended early in the application process. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT TWELVE SETS OF PRINTS. .. ' 1 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name Ur,r// 4, ; 4 Ck·67/< 9 0/,vi 2. Project \ocation 9 10 (3. tf~mz- Ave. 4<17+1 06-3. li- 2 g// (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 436/ 4. Lot size ci 00 51 9061 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 04'&72-n I./0:*Bets 51 6 V -,-4 4 6 ~64-v, 6.e> . 5 161 I 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number fl % 4 (,t 1 1 . 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD ~~ Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Ce€f« 9 602 ·- i A-~4- 8« 04€2 9. Description of development application T.t 47 0.-.7- ,.. Ae·~J-- Z afT 6 4-; uj; -,Aow 0--$ A e p ur e *.FL grje J.ou, - ¢,u ..410,V 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Address: f Zone district: \~ Lot size: / Existing FAR: \ Allowable FAR: \ Proposed FAR: \ / Existing net leasable (commerci\Q: / Proposed net leasable (commerci®: / Existing % of site coverage: ./ - Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: \ Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: \ Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: / Existing number of bedrogplis: Proposed number of be¢ - jms: Existing on-site parking/spaces: On-site parking spa~§ required: \ Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: \ Proposed: Front: Front: 0.,Front: Rear: 1 Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: FronVrear: FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) m!; .. ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information: 1. The applicant's name, address, and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the development review. 4. An 81/2" x11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. .. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW All applications for minor development review must include the following information: 1. If determined appropriate by the Community Development Director, a site plan or survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. ~2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. ~1 3. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. ~ 4. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application, including a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic 4- structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. .. ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq.ft. or the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.040.090 (B)(2). 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. "HISTORIC DISTRICT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGN GUIDELINES" HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CITY AND ARE AVAILABLE AS A FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE INTENT OF HPC AND GENERAL PRINCIPALS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL APPLICANTS SHOULD CONSULT THIS RESOURCE, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. .. ATTACHMENT 6 GENERAL SUMMARY OF ONE STEP HPC APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The following are the types of development applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: • Minor development review • Partial demolition • On-site or temporary relocation 2. Development review procedure summary. The one step HPC review procedure is as follows: • Attend a pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with the historic preservation planner is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. • Submit development application. Based on your pre-application conference, respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies, and fee if applicable, to the Community Development Department. • Determination of completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by Staff to determine if all required information has been included. You will be notified in writing when additional materials are necessary. • Review of development application. Once the application is determined to be complete, the item will be scheduled on the soonest HPC agenda available. The submission due date is a minimum of nine days prior to the HPC meeting date to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review the application with respect to it's compliance with land use regulations and to write a memo to the Historic Preservation Commission. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, approval with conditions, tabling, or denial of the application. The memo is normally available at the end of the week prior to the HPC meeting. The planner will call the applicant or representative when the memo is ready and can also provide the expected agenda time for the item. 3. At the meeting, staff will make a brief presentation of the case and then the Chair will ask the applicant or representative to make a presentation or to .. clarify any aspects of the project. HPC members will comment on the proposal and then vote on an action. 4. Receipt of building permit. Once the approval of HPC has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. 5. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to HPC. .. ATTACHMENT 7 DEFINITION OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT Minor development shall be defined as follows: • Remodeling of a structure where alterations are made to no more than one element of the structure, including but not limited to a roof, window, door, skylight, ornamental trim, siding, kickplate, dormer, porch, staircase, and balcony; • Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase in floor area of the structure is two hundred fifty (250) square feet or less; or • Erection or remodeling of combinations of, or multiples of no more than three (3) of the following features: awnings, canopies, signs, fences, and other similar attachments; or windows, doors, skylights, and dormers. Erection of more that three (3) of the above listed features may be defined as minor if there is a finding that the cumulative impact on such development is minor in its effect on the character of the existing structures. • Erection of street furniture, signs, benches, public art, or similar development which is to be placed throughout the Commercial Core or Main Street Historic Districts. The community development director may determine that the development is to be reviewed as a significant development, pursuant to Section 26.72.010(F). Public hearing requirements will not apply. /6" |- ~Afe- I 1. f . '14 e 4 e. I £ 0 1 0 , 1 i, 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 f . 0 1 :(.4 . -C-karI W