Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.HP.533 E Main St.HPC23-95
J 1 I L U 1.11 4 5 33 c NU,v<- 5 , ~ ~ 0 6yvt,4- 2737-073-31-001 HPC23-95 '~ / 1 Abt N Q- 61 . , ' '& : ' ' ' , , F , f , '. 32, '4 .r . C , 1 ' I,t a 111 11'' 1 --.2. 2,22 . t:,11!Ey"~11 f--Fv- f·,~:TI'eM 1 - • 9 ,,!t' ,4·'~·".~'Ll i 'T- 1-1, 1.... '1 ~r, -''A'' :-4,1. t.', TELEDYNE POST N02859 Z ' 40.'ll, 1 :'71• 4 /' 1 , 4 ' , , .--4· % 4 : 4 , 11,1 14 ' 1 '11 1 4~111 .1414:9 ! 3. I 3 I. I /, 34Mi . - ' 11. 1 lilli C z 3 0 3 GALENA lm*T r & · ,' I 4 3 ' I ffs/' C , 09 7 .4, .d' I f. 1 ' 1 117 r i 1 1 1 g8 33 1 41 1 i ' .-4. ..' 4 :. A ' .J 33 9 5 1 4 9 4 ' 4 ..101 I n A a -IJD 100.Q, N 14. 5,9,41:-425 TE WALK '41 ki '111.11 1 IN 1 1 ./ 2 \ I J ... . 1- /1 I 0 '0 2 0- . O - 1 . .1 .1/11 + '· .. 6 1 . 1111- I Z 741 . ' 81 2 " P , 05 4~ , 1 3 , . ' ./9 Z .4.1 i M ' ' LI In ~ _8\1 ' >:L I /1 .,1.~r. .1 1 5.., , 7-v IGWE\~ \~ \49 4 , /4 10\ ...\\\\ 16-462- /- \71 «99 .- 1 :.: 1, t. D : ./41 '41'. 1 fi'.4,:'y: i'../4,16 'Ir 40.1. ..0 . >„r.42 :%4'4,4 :,tf I r I r'' ' 4, 11- .,Ii\. + I : 9 1 1 2.,11 'h.l'.?T t< 1,r . Fl 01 J - i XI 4 , - 4, 1 {1. 1 1 IN 4,1 4 A 1 | 1 1.. 1 83 k I' ' r ./ ' 0 - 11 61 2 114 9 ..24.,1 r 1 .' .1, '' 1- 1 1.1 f '1" 4 (D , A ,.f .4~ 1,„ M 01 1 6) 0 13 7 )04::; r•4 .,F~?. 1 41 4 · - -1 ' 1 :lit- 01.0, 4. 9- " 1 "0.· . . 1 .. r.MAIN , UNK , FENCE , , ..1 1135.9 #th-1XX\ L --,4-- ___ .-. 3UFFLLJM *Q: I , 1 / 1-- -« -Pillbil-'- I -- - , , Ii: j . 31; ii.'J 1 3' . M > W, 0 70 1 0 , 12 K - \ , 1 Zr %' G -4 1. t 04. D n V - W i # t==1 ¢ ~ ...6- t. P :tx , 1 r . 2 14, 1 11'.1 0 ..¥;%: 11 -- 1144 ...62...: --- , 0,1,1 1 '1.-1 - 1, t..9 1 1 1, '11 1 - ' 4\111 .1 r , -41.9 1~ ' - 7 1,11 -1.. t'. 41111 ~ 1 '...1,1.112,1 4,:1 9, 1 1 1 1. [117..2- ..LL.-'".,17,1,7.49 .1,9 .t 0 I .1 J 11 ' . r 1 -41* 4 ::r *47· 1 .i , 'r'*+ '. '94. O M , tri ...., i . ' /2 1 ....0 , ..t" LIJ« - 11 i 1 '' , ' It.„; i -4 1 . A ...41, 1 , 1 ... B / --- - . ~ ~ 0 , ,· ~· 9272&11' . 12 ·4 · ·1~;9 9, -'.Aul. ' <2 11., 0.10. I 1 // 4 1 ' '4 \ . . '1., 71$.. 1 J -9 83 i <¢6 . /10 . . '· / '4' .,51}5 4 .., P: b 1 r '~br- '4 '1 '1 1'r j , 1 1 1 /6. , mn - 1., 700 , , r 44 i ; 2. 1 . h / ; , , ·- 7-.l' ;'-1'-'···' 4,1, :144/2 -/.0 1 ' r '11 + 11'h £ 510.4,¥1*q ,.T b, 1.1,1,4, , l ' 0 1 1~~Ir,1 / 'c .4·'& 14..;5111 / I 1 . A 1 4 ''t t.....4 1 1~ ~ P I : / .=447 0 zi; / / / / //-3 1/ 1 o - . . i . I n / 2 , .. ,, ,€)4 1 1, . "11 i . w I /5 M / 1 . ED» M 1 . 1, J 4. I 1, 4. 13 40- C ZE /5 ' ' I.: : .4 e' irl r mm 9 90 2 9 k 9 i® . 11'.1 96 1 1, i. 1 . 1 ' :.. 1 11 . t ~m~ p m ar «K (,2 6-- 18.8 0 . 1.- "1 -r 4,1 A r Al, 1 . 11, , i - m 7 3 th B 0 04 \\ 1 .. ./:' - ' 1 2.€ % 1 1 ,>1 - 1 f,4. 1,1'~3, , 2, "Z.~·:,;P~~f:} t.;4~,-'~ 73*l' r -11 -1 i.-, 1 A.:1.,1, 4,49.f w ¢0 -4 ~ g 8- 1 . 7/I ~•'1'r'l'.1,;#14,1,1 1.>1, -04. 1 ., , .1 1 B 1 16 rn a Ill 1,1.Vic'.,14.241,~.%1~1 4 1 C 1 .1.1 , ., ~. ,$.. 'r,>.r.,7::,4, 63'A . - 664'.0 6 7 ZA -1 r , ' d • I- , - 1. .,r , . '11 f.1 1 Z , i Vi 23 - c 8- Q, Im \\\11./4 \%.hke.,~6&1„\\\ I,L 1 '; 4//, . 1 1, 2,4 1 .-1 '4/ .1.10 . 1, .11 1 1 11.-144 , IMP ' 44% 2 L .1 14 r i '' i't 7 + -& '' M. 111 -\\~ il». -% 4»\ ~ 171 2 : 1...1. ,. · .f ·,A 1,4 , ~10 :,•': i ~ F *tr ·" i. 4.4,1,•. kh rn ~ \\\\\\\\\\ 1 M. 8 --- - C 0 r 2. , i 9494/Vilifilp)d 3 .1 - 0 Z Z 5 + •' lie- /1 ,,b .1. 1/ . r f r j , 0 19 641 ' 1, 08 3 · 6 1 ''' Il,·"1 :f .t , er L'"' 11.&: ji gAT - 1 '~to« 41 IN\\30»« li» r'<94 .1 0 11\\T' 1 '77 4 , \ \ \\ \\ \\\~~~ 1 --1, ...a: ..... 0 (7,(. 1 . -11 % \94\106. ., d I '1 1. . #'i .0, 1, . /1/6 1, 1 - Il\ ..21/Ii i ' Ill ' 'r i '4·' I.\ \\\ \ ' 1 . . ew ,- 1- -- ----I'll--6~~~~...~...C.~ « + ---- -- XII ' ,]1 1 m ' 444 1 1 1 - " d ly 44 - '/ A -/ 74:i,~i '1$''l rn 4 C#D 1=3 M V - 1- 1.1 1, 2 1 1,911 1 1 6. -1 0 . 1 0 1 1. 1 4.,114.94 4 r w ' rer I -3 :4. £ t \ F I 1, , . TI 4 1 \ 1 . ' . '.:H 3/2./ /1 1 * . , 8 r JT 1 iLilill i 01 1, 1 ..104\\\ \\ 9 5 O Eli 5 ~ - L_ A ----- 1 -____________-_---_--_M'~ . 1 -j J - Ir 1 1 1 9 ' 9* 2 -i 1 1 3 0 , 0 %. '. ' R 'd , , % 47 2 6 11 i 1 C g 'I m-1 ' D. 1 1 1 C.1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 - 1. 11 S 40 50' 41 - U/ 1000' 1 r i .. 6 1 1 CONCKerd ' WALK , · -3 1,4 ., . .0 ., C . ' . 1 , , .,7 , 3 Z, 1 ' 1 - 1 ' p.l ' 4 TER STREET GO, 1,1 - , . O 0 ir@ 1 .lil ./1 1 '1 I ' 4 15% im,f,9.:444, 4. "410''g ·· 6,1 4 0 - r '' t'(24~§·611,11$,kr'•110!,j#404%=41.ti~ · ~ 54 - ~-- 1 4." -Amer.'-, . IJ 1 . ...1.,m........'.9*MY"fw,Wrm(.7,;flh'.0, -.-r. 2.6/ M./&'4*/*PP.p ZL91.8 Opejoloo 'ue Uoejew 30 1112 u,•045 uoiteogiveD aut #0 ateP 041 U,04 Sie@A Ual Uell; aJOUL, paiweWUJOi ag 1,eja *UnS SNi u, papp Xue uodn paseq uoine Aue Xew jua" 0 U, 10/,ap 4Ons (gawv-ld,91A OCW) 69 4-m 01 Sl.10!S!Aell .OUI 'SA ue uodn peseq ope,0,03 01 6uipmoov 30:10 la~OOSIp 1SJI~ nOX CONCRETE %VALK .I//- coOKr 1-OUSIL £631[507<FI 0 3£ )IurIV RENCE. 1901 NT DGdOS ET STAIRS .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 8/1/95 CASE NUMBER: hpc23-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-31-001 PROJECT NAME: St Mary's Church Remodel Project Address: Hunter & Main APPLICANT: Rev. Lawrence Solan Applicant Address: 104 S. Galena 925-7339 REPRESENTATIVE: Deanna Olsen Representative Address/Phone: P.O. Box 10661 Aspen 920-9758 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: 11- 9 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 533 E. Main, St. Mary's Church- Minor Date: August 9, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to change the existing double doors at the northeast and northwest corners of the building into windows for office space, to add a screen door over the kitchen door on the west of the building, to add light fixtures on both sides of the west kitchen door, to add outlets on each side of the west kitchen door, to add intake air grills on the south and west elevations, to remove a meter box, and pipes from the south elevation, and to add an exhaust grill on the south elevation. This structure is listed a local landmark, is located within the Commercial Core Historic District and is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. APPLICANT: St. Mary's Church, Reverend Lawrence Solan, represented by Olsen and Kelley Architects. LOCATION: 533 E. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Section 7-601 has recently been amended through Planning and Zoning Commission, Resolution 6, Series of 1995. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adj acent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The church is in "Phase III" of their remodel, which involves interior changes to the first floor. The new floor plan requires creating two new offices in the front corners of the building, under the staircases. These offices currently have no access to natural light, other than the existing double doors on the east and west .. walls. The applicant has proposed several alternatives, including removing the existing doors and glazing the openings, replacing the panels in the existing doors with glazing, and replacing the existing doors with ones to match, but with glazing where there are panels. (Apparently the existing doors are not well weatherized. Staff is concerned with all Of these solutions, especially because the doors are original and are very much part of the character of the building and because the change would be very visible. one other possible solution would be to glaze the door opening and retain the existing doors almost as if they were shutters. The doors could be kept closed when the offices are not in use and could be propped open when needed. (A similar solution was used on the old firehouse in Redstone, which is now a private residence.) Note that the clerestory windows above the doors have been painted out and are not useable due to the staircase structure inside. NO information has been provided about the exact locations or dimensions of the proposed mechanical changes or the design of the light fixtures. The area where these elements are to be placed is not generally visible to the public. No information is provided about the appearance of the screen doors for the kitchen. If possible, perhaps the existing wood doors could be made to swing out and the screen doors could be on the inside. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This block is the only city block in Aspen which contains all 19th century structures. It is very important to minimize changes as much as possible in order to preserve the character of this area, but the historic buildings must also function for their users. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The building is eligible for the National Register. It is one of only two 19th century churches still left in Aspen, and although it has had some alterations, retains much of its original character and detailing. It is an important visual landmark in the City and lies on the edge of the historic district and a corner of Main Street. In this sense, again, it is not the changes at the rear of the building, but the issue .. of the doors which is more important. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The changes needed at the back corner of the building can be accommodated without much impact to the character of the building. If the changes to the doors could be somehow reversible or temporary, as in the manner suggested under standard #1, it would be a more appropriate solution. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC table the Minor Development application, requesting that the applicants provide detailed information about the location, size, and appearance of the mechanical changes, and more information about the screen doors. Additional Comments: NInCBMENT 1 ~ IAND USE APPLIaP~ RIM ~ 1) Project Name 4% 11'fl''e CADfal firlope· 6 - fl-9¥68 IC 2) moject Incaticn HU &11-te- 11 1-1,y J 40. / Al*01.j, £59. &010» A - 215 , $140kr 621* - (inlicate street addkess, lot & block nmber, iegal description where awropriate) 3) Present Zoning 66 4) Int Size , 422 A.,3 . 5) Aprlicant'S Name, Maress & Ehone # ~ Rev· LAWKEWEF. '91-•,41 , gforz- 1 04 9, »1»UA + i A'5fl€Kli /50 . C q·zt>*7 :356,1-9 - 6) Reumsaitative' S Nane, Adiress & Brne # Chidk ~A /14/1 (06441 -1- 4blpf 0,»Illf*)) 1 2/7. gwy to»1 I .»**11 62. Atrotz. l( 42-0 -174,~) - 7) :Iypd of Application (plaase check all that gply):-._ 4 - Conditional Use -I.I.I..- Conceptual SPA Corr•,rtual Historic: Dev. Special Deview Final SEA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenlina Ccnceptual ED ~ Minor Histo(cic Dev. Stream Margin - Final FUD Rig:FnriC Dmriliting lemtain View Plane - Subdivisirn Hist=ic Designaticn Condcminiumization .-. Teoct/M® Amendment -- aUg Mlotment Iot Spli-vIot line (2433 Eboimption Adjustment Descriptic„) of Existing Uses (r,mber and type of existing structures; •Ir¥=rilm,te sq. ft.; Inmber of bedrocms; any previous approvals granted to the property)*. 1920.1606 *FFFO,/AL- <fip**rry[> R¥t APP 1110·1 dr El.ev:4¥- -WWEF-, 1* 41<6 »I *IdS ¢ Fut %1449, A leer( ¢ 6 4!UR:511. fkspe( 16 + 19*f EFI/,In B0Uridc1 ca kit»IJIL\6 1144 pm,1-4 +baF, 4 4•NK#6. fl·le- .611'Unt IS /4 2*Fy BFDK Ript. »FT04, 54*MEd-1- 6*MO)(, fow 4) ' £52&1174 U l KI 6 -114!5 ~.1~~af~JJ£&UI~ LEVE.L. 0 (2' Ece.45 Al EL,5 12)1 4315 00 1.610€12 'Fl+ME- ~11% F20Mota,1, ~24 51 9[5 dr--14* FOLLAWIN (41 : [*VELI F43*10(94, t¥ £9*905-~ I /<im#AN.>f A*A·3 1 trvitee ; M.\-EMPA) CAM,6"/ G.A'161 6«,eMOV€\,916 , 81<616 9'5~Feo~46 10) Have you attached the following? X Response to Attachment 2, Mini],im Submission ocntents X Remponse to Attachment 3, Specific Sulnission Contents V Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Awlication all'1111 - .. ATTACHMENT 2 Description of Proposal and Compliance with Review Standards: 1. There is a desire to provide natural light to two new office spaces located below the stairs at the entry to the Church, office 3 and the reception office. The door wall is the only opportunity for light. The following are design options for the pair of existing doors on the east and west elevations adjacent to the entry at the lower level (photo #3): a) Option 1: Replacement of the existing doors with windows to match existing. b) Option 2: These doors are not weather-sealed and let in a great deal of outside air. We will replace the doors with new weather-sealed doors to match the existing doors. The new doors will have clear insulated glass at each of the five panels in each leaf. Door paint color to match existing. c) Option 3: The existing doors will remain. The five wood panels in each existing door leaf will be replaced with insulated glass. The doors will be weather -sealed to prevent drafts. 2. Addition of screens to the kitchen doors on the west elevation (photo #1)to conform to Environmental Health requirements for public kitchens. Screen doors shall be painted to match the existing doors in an effon to blend with the existing doors. 3. Addition of a wall-mounted light fixture adjacent to both the kitchen doors on the west elevation (photo #1) and the rear door on the south elevation (photo # 2). Fixtures shall be chosen which the architect best feels matches the historical character of the existing building. Fixture cut sheets shall be submitted to HPC for approval. 4. Addition of two water resistant electrical outlet s, one on each side of the kitchen door at a height of 18" above the patio. These outlets shall be painted a brick red color as are other outside outlets, inorder to match the wood trim they are mounted against. 5. Addition of the intake air grills along the south and west elevations. These grills will be integrated into the brick wall by removing bricks as required and placing them on their sides so as to create small perforations for the air to pass. Details will be provided upon request. 6. The electric meter box, exterior steel vent pipes and the 16" diameter exhaust vents on the south elevation (photo # 2) will be removed. The electric meter is currently an abandoned meter which has been replaced with a meter located on the trash enclosure. The vent pipes and exhaust vents will no longer be required in these locations when the kitchen is relocated in the phase 111 remodeling. 7. A new exhaust grill will be located on the exterior wall of the kitchen on the south elevation, which will be very similar to the existing one. With regard to the exterior revisions which are being proposed, where applicable it is our desire to at all times match the existing materials and colors, or to blend with the existing materials so as not to diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of the structure. .. ATTACHMENT 3 Description of Proposed Development: The proposed remodel of St. Mary's Church - Phase 111 is an interior remodel of the lower level of the church. It will include remodeling of the classroom/assembly areas, offices, congregate housing facilities, relocation and remodeling of the kitchen, enlargement of the public restrooms to include the addition of toilet, lavatory and shower fixtures to more closely meet the plumbing code requirements and the provision of handicap facilities. The heating and ventilation system will also be redesigned to provide more efficient heating and to meet the ventilation requirements of the remodeled spaces. Fffect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design: The interior remodeling is a reconfiguration of the existing spaces in an effort to better serve the parish. All the Church functions will remain the same. The replacement of the existing wood doors with windows or the replacement of the solid wood panels in the doors on the east and west elevations adjacent to the entry will provide natural light to two new office spaces. Glazing will give this area of the exterior wall a more transparent feeling so that it will more closely match the windows along each side of the building adjacent to these doors. Exhaust and intake vents or grills will need to be relocated on the exterior of the building inorder to meet new mechanical requirements. Additionally some of the old mechanical equipment, pipes and grills, will be removed. It is our desire to alter the structure as little as possible and will welcome your suggestions to reduce this impact. .. P.k 9 2 \ 23 . t f. 1 1 j · 7» v - 444 4 , 09 g h I7 D f / q 0 04 a. / ~C, 4 10 B salt .... 104«\. /0.9% AN le 0 19 /, i -4~e- 1, 1 ~ =' =e =v 0 a•...I=\ Hallam *% Notev--orroad I - 1.ake n-nadonm,mormeted* str- ocatdis. Construcion 01 01,81,and,0- ml be in .... 1 Progi'. 1" (.I'.i m.,"'I - 4 4. 14 \ ~~ Mwoon C.* Rd - 4 0 0,4 Aspen € . P. - .44 i 1 :A: 4 M.*L.-04 A • / .3 6/ 44 0 Minaa a Or ...... bl . /\0 4 M."-Dr._....„O*6 M.,loon Lake *8-4 Rd..........H-1-7 4 8 444 e » Dool•,10 CZ......_ . H.2-3 M............„.-.F-0-3 ... Mid=dAL.............11-6-7 I ...H+6 Mill k..........-.............043 Aer,c Ct, Pk... ..11+7 E--d Rd............. ··.....1-7 M-Ch St. -' -- P . 1 0 ....... O-6 -0, Hollow-I· ......E-4 M-I-VI. D._.... 3 Al. V- Dr. .F-2-3 F-1, St...U........ .. G-3-6 M= Lid CL De .......... Ar~more a. Dr .H.7 Pld I.•---1 -. ....1.6-7 -O-M .- „- 2 ~ //M / 1 Aspe' Alp, M 1-3-6 0~- SL-...1....................H·5 Neate Av H. Aspe, Grove Rd ... H-1-7 0~ St.···/.··-·· G-H-4-3 Ni/,1- DI........... ~--__E,5 . AH" SI...0 ·. ··+. .G-H-3 0.- A........1. . ····G-H-3-6 N=h S...--.......-J.3-4 . i Bay Si. ...G-6 Gill- SL....1...... .........H·5 Rk k.······.· ......„r.....-.- (16 -•- C» ..-„9.-__E.3 B...d Parker . . .... ... G.3 .....F-4 :=9.. ......H.2 ~ill: ~- A=Yq :TririZI~JFL.7"" 2 ~ Be-u Bed Ci. Pl. Rd.....£-4.5 Rlva,id, Ek..1.-...........1.7 4..r Black Birch Dr . EF23 Hal- St..1. G-3-3 MAv. Cit......./........_...........H Ro-, Fork...„...._.--543 'q . Blecke, SI ... ....G.3-3 == Ar.....041.2 . p- St............1.............-......P-4 E. Bleeker St G.H.3-6 03 Minhe.DIL-...........IN52 S.b:. [*........t..... ... D E-6 So- A............................04 Bluebonnet Ti .H·2 Hom-*0 8..... Pilm Re-e. J.................£-A s. a...==..7 .._.E-2 S~ 1 -- 041-34 ~ Bunny Ln ...E-2-3 G·H-3-6 M=,Li.......1.·········..--_F.5 Sal.,- CE.. ..... ...„_......1-2 ... SL.......-..........-----04 Calc Creek Dr.. .... . F.3 ,-............. .......H-3 P-1 Pl- R,....................543 Saw-11C1 ...T .- -- G-3 9.I'.4--..-...-..H-5 Castle Creek Rd ..G·/-1.3 Hiler Creek Rd... .........E·F-6 ki.-paa.1. ···········.·-M-2 Ses-, St.......1......._.......G-H-7 Xetirt~=2--741 9 91 Centennial Cir... .1*7 U#iii A.... .G.H.4.6 a,p,Smil*...... ...._.G·3 Sio-od 04..................1+74 Ch.fickl Rd. ...E·2 H-4-5 PPI'",d Rd...1...........„-.-..~..J-1 Sit-11481...........„.--E-2 Tbia Ridp Dr i 62 Circul A•...... .1.7 / 164 St. .._ H.6 UzA•. M......... 1.1-6 Clevel-d 9... ....1-6 / / Lake Av .. .. F.0.4 44 4 Vi- SL--- 0-6 Coope, Av... „ ...H-4-5 / ~ ...H.2 Red B- DI.1... ....„..118-2-3 Smillk Si............. .....F*3-3 Wa~"' SL Coao•wood Cir... ....H-2 Red Motmt- kd- .......D,O-5-6 Sm#9*, 0,0,4 RL..........H-6-7 ""I A..........„......--.....14 ~ 0,•to~wood Ln .....L.G.6 1-0= Anc Rd ... G.3-6 Reh Rd..........&....... ....CE-44 Sm•,1- Moum- Rd.. .1-H-6-1 W. E,d S...............-'.-IN. Cy/.1 L.ke Rd... ....17 Lup- Dr...... ....1-J.8 Re'=t St........ 1 .........174-7 2~Acturnot; To Twin Lakes. D- 51 ...4.......H. M.,r,co Rd. 04 Z:=4 4. 0.11.34 * At PHA MAPS . E-3 Wil-~,4 Wy...........--BM Independen Pass Sno• Bunay C#... -. £-3 ................-......E-3 Mam St < 60441101.1 oF: 1: 1+F~'5 gwuFGH VIGINIll FIA F i 6, :11 1 mha< .,r, \1 1 917 HAPT~' O ./ ... '4& t 6514"Fc*+ EntloPIEL 2. ., . ft #•: ,.2 ...,t 7/1 ,· . 14.29. I.4,11. Ah *B¥"1 i-v ..ru·A w.12 -· -- 95' ''. g :442 4 . . . i AFFIAL- WeT il.EVATial 1 (19#TD *+1) - 27 - 5 - ./ 6..=;M t= 71 +11 7 =48@*a :- - - · -9/*-G; - 40 r %2 [ 0 - - 7.- - , 11 . ·O - i + 11 - 47- 1 -1% 1--1,1/ -- -11/. 9, p / 9-= al , i .. *-E - 41 1 4 1, k --1 <' - .7 . .1. - 1,9 - 13 11 It 1-1- . 4-\ i ¢'~'31~]fr~n -41 -- . ./r V f 1111111 N 1111'i'41~|Irk.14 t -- I '11111* 1 1 - - uv0*f-?2pil #i. -tit22 - *UTH ELa»1104 1>FT '» WEd[-- E.Law,['00 (Fu'F •2.) (Flk'129 4*3) i ·,it'*t * , 1 ¢ .. dAT. MfiRY's b4CTIURCL / A€~CEMTEMMIAL =2732'1662 ~1962 August 1, 1995 Amy Amidon Historic Preservation Officer Community Development Department 130 South Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 Dear Amy: As pastor of St. Mary's Church - Aspen, I authorize the firm of Olsen +Kelley Architects ( P.O. Box 10661, Aspen, Co. 81612 / 970-920-9758) to act as our representative during the processing of this application for Minor Historic Development as it relates to the Remodel of St. Mary's Church - Phase 111. Sincerely, '71 9<44 . Z-A_20*+4 -), 1-4.00+~ 2 1. Rev. Lawrence T. Solan, pastor 104 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 303/925-7339 .. ST MARY'S -RCHURCin WAVRE /#s &~CEITTE ITITIYIL 6/%0/1 - ' I.i*& 4·u-Al'j 11602 ,-96*411962 August 1, 1995 City Manager's Office 130 South Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 Dear Mayor and City Council: As pastor of St. Mary's Church - Aspen, I would like to request a fee waver with regard to the $110.00 application fee used for the processing of the application for Minor Historic Development as it relates to the Remodel of St. Mary's Church - Phase 111 on the basis that St. Mary's is a non- profit organization. Sincerely, 1~~-A~--2~~«-v, 2-2~ 56= Rev. Lawrence T. Solan, pastor 104 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 303/925-7339 Tom Issac PltkIn County Asse88or 506 East Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER - SAINT MARY'S 00' 012942 STATUS:A 2737 073 jl P¢'1 No I HAERBER, El AL - L/O {200 17!H ST, 28-TH FLOOR 00 20/09 hENVER, 01 rv AND 1 OWNS ITE UF ASPEN 1-11 t.: 93 Lf.11: A.. 1 51'·1 1. r.1 r MARY' 4 1 : A 1 1-·11.1 l... I i.. 1.21. 11,11 a'll Ant: 7 250000 AND i 652%00 Ar: 1 7 1:· 1.11:.1 1 - 1 1 It 11 1. 1 1...1···- 1 I~ IPE. Al 1 - ifto,),4>11) 1.1'.ty': 1:,1...1 .1'flu) Ai ,~ . L. 1 b) UM VALUE 91 1. , 1/4 9 , c.)(, 9 For BUILT AD,}MuleD YEAR BU11 1 85 A L u E S S E 0 9 1 1 0 1 / 9 5 1.41 I .3,16?,! Il:4·. c 6./ 1.1 / 95 0 0 COMMITMENT SCIEDULE A MARLENE ST MARYS 104 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN 00 81611 1. Effective Date: June 27, 1995 at 7:00 AM Order No. 404100 -C RS/bs Customer Reference ARCH OF DEN 2. ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: S Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETE-MINED 3. ALTA Loan Policies Amount: S Proposed Insured: Proposed Insured: Amount: S 4. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: FEE SIMPLE and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER issued by: Owner's Premium: S ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION Lender' s Premium: $ 600 EAST }IOPKINS AVENUE #305 Add'l Lender Chg: S ASPEN 00 81611 Add'l Charges: S FAX (970) 920-4052 Tax Certificate: $ (970) 920-4050 DENVER 595-8463 ~GET« Ehdorsement Chg: $ TBD Oarges: $ 138.00 mrAL DIARGES: $ 138.00 ~ AUG 0 4 1995 ~ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COPANY COMMUs·:i . v \ DEVF.OPMENT / . 1 f'*Ht2133' mit 4 .. COMMITMENT Plat id No. SaIEDULE A (continued) Order No. 404100 -C 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is covering the land in the State of Colorado, County of Pitkin , described as follows: Lots A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I, Block 93, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE OOMPANY .. COMMITMENT SCIEDULE B Order No. 404100 -C Section 1 REQUIREMENIS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to wit: 1. Deed from THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER to A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED. NOTE: Duly executed real property transfer declaration, executed by either the Grantor or Grati tee, to aooonpany the Deed mentioned above, pursuant to Article 14 of House Bill No. 1288 - CRA 39-14-102. A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EAai TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY 'IRFASURER' S AUTIIORIZED AGENT PURSUANT TO 1983 C.R.S., 39-1-102 (14.5) AT A aU\RGE OF $10.00 EACH TO THE CUSTOMER. THE CIJMPANY RESERVES TI IE RIG! IT TO CONDUCT AN ADDITIONAL SEAROI OF TI IE RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF TIE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR PITKIN OOUNTY, COLORADO FOR JUD(PIENI' LIENS, TAX LIENS OR CrHER SIMILAR OR DISSIMILAR INVOUJNrARY MATIERS AFFECTING THE GRANrEE OR GRANIEES, AND TO MAKE SUCH ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS IT DEEMS NECESSARY, AFTER 'Il-IE IDENI'ITY OF THE GRANTEE OR GRANTEES I IAS BEEN DISCLOSED TO THE COMPANY. NOTE: THIS COMMITMENr IS ISSUED UPON THE EXPRESS AGREEENT AND UNDERSTANDING THAT THE APPLICABLE PREMIWS, CHARGES AND FEES SHALL BE PAID BY THE APPLICANT IF THE APPLICANT AND/OR ITS DESIGNEE OR NOMINEE CLOSES TIE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED BY OR OTHERWISE RELIES UPON THE CO+!ITMENr, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND SCHEDULES OF RATES ON FILE WITH THE COLORADO DEPARIMENr OF INSURANCE. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1. .. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Section 2 EXCEMIONS Order No. 404100 -C The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Campany: Any loss or damage, including attorney fees, by reason of the matters shown below: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shcxqn by the public records but which could ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any other facts which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public reoords. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbranoes, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Camlitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax. special assessnents, charge or lien i-Inposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. 7. ' Any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper, or any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws, as reserved by M. G. Miller, County and Probate Judge of Pitkin County, Colorado, in the Deed to Edward Downey recorded October 24, 1887. 8. Notice of Historic Designation recorded January 13, 1975, itt Book 295 at Page 515. 9. Resolution No. 2 (Series of 1993) A Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Carmittee Vesting The Site Speci fic Final Development Plan for St. Mary' s Church recorded March 1, 1993, in Book 704 at Page 874. 10. Encroachment Agreement between the City of Aspen and Saint Mary' s Catholic Church, Diocese of Denver recorded July 1, 1993, in Book 716 at Page 622. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CEMPANY .. ~1'-Id,KL 1 1 L 1 L . -1.21--ILf--Le¢¤I .1.»A-TII[Tfhupuy-~ . ~ 1 1 1- .-1 ~I- N~-'. ~~f 1 1 1 -1 1 . 1 1 ~ L.-1- 1 --t -tr€ _r-_449 - (06<' Hel) Y 1-/ fi~ p--J-- 94d·*~> Eavv» Lit-17 tEll . 21 -_ .--JI- t- 1 - 1 - T.. I JL- I - _ 1- .t*1.- 1 -- --~~ ~7 - -1 I L 1- L .1 - 1- HIE·*/ Fh*·13) , '1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 ! 1 7-- 1 -- 42-7 1. 1 ././ -1.J. -1-r.-7-. .1.-I.'~in-· - PAH#1·0*. 2 -p,p~i, .- 4,/ Al/€ ' 1 1-1-1 .A'* «EWEI 7¥F, 1 1 1·1 1.1 11 1 -1- 2 -- -1 1 t~11 - 6 046,+ LIA.1 .· r, i l I i f -1-- :- -l E .: -- -~-.-121--1 - . 1 . 1-1 -1 ---_.1-' --EE-- 1-- ~1~1 -1-z 1.1 1 .1- 111.....1.-J. T - r 7- 7- t-f- e.><1*P1-1 4 . 0 7 -11 ~ r! 1 -1 T i 1 5 FAH M- L. 1] 1-1--1-1 -1 1 1 | 31 Fl 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 9*0152 QLL 1 -1 1.1 1.1 T .,- 1 . .-1 --.1-4.-1- -1--9.- 1. 1 1 11.11 1~-1 ---1 . -1 E f. 1 f 1-122 1 1 1 (FAI '~trE:13 _ -41 I .1 lili - 2 1.- f 11"- . L. 1 . - 12-- - r; 11.-1-11 - _-L_.. . 1 1 1 ..1 ~_t- 1- 7*WI-~ 1- 1 -11 1 . i ...1.... T 1--- I 1 1 -1 Ir--11 1 111-toi-- .. . .„ 1 r -1,3 .. 11 : 11 1 - .1 , r. 1 > 1.4,< C t.3 ~ I, r; 2%-61 (*P &* 5,1 141ll,A© 4/ FIAFf /9 6*11-1» 120121/53:01/ - flt#*E' IE 3/25" 9 1|19 11 4 · 7.19 (Miontl<olleyArgN#.Fts J .. -I -Jer \1 ---1- ' 1 1 I 1 1 1 '~y-/ I .-I .)- ~£ Ii.*- -1- . - - ---- -- blUtt~ilkLL1.-=lu-ldly>ff *32>* ·-=---- · - - 1 ----IU--- ---1-_-2-2 -:~it ;tllifttl-til$? Rf 1=3-T- T d~W *peed il Fil - ... - -..7--. .--- .......-.--- RZOF- ove-fi itiL- . :i k. ~l|-|. 1.- 1-1-1 i=.2-1 1 --4 REE[-% e miNg'/ -+Ilrit,7 :11: - i i--i.-3.-4: .....t ~--- --------- PC€>r t. \A/£012 i i - ./.4 - - . - - .--9 .--- 1- 1 -„ -- - -- - -T- 911 [+9 + 194 14 t_ - -- ------- / -t: il-~14 it, 4 1-1 1 1~Ii.-_13 - --- ' 12,HAE+1 2014*4) .- l 1-r·r Tr'-T--0 *P 99 9 r .- 1 i t' 11 1-24- 7#441 ..1,41 -- -.--- ---~ int.t=:«4+4:i~ 1 4 - i-]1 jt~~ -4 --·--- -··---·-·~ ---- -~------~ --~--- 1'44": U -tttl':; 1 - WIKE' 1/1 4 Pr 0-'14 , 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 - c papp 4"Ne'P„AF& - 1/pfc+F g«6~ »F«1 -~ 12:*?12· '*44 ((8 [229[2-*4) «14/'AFs<'4 64}01*514 'CE[/10 9% 4 - FHA·56. IE 3/22' = 0,0" 1,7. 19 Olsen+Kelley Architects Fumex¥atrap ' -4 ¥i 1 ./'"./0- .4 €3~ >trd Fumex Fatrap fans are ideal for use 'r,r· 6 in commercial kitchens over grilles, ...... y..... charcoal broilers, deep fat fryers, -- al- t? ' steam tables, ranges, dishwashers , illlllllllllllllllllle,MIIIIVS'AC 41¥ ]Im//2/ iliallllllll/ ..1 and other appliances both gas fired ,~- ':7 '~.~'t'IF,8. 'f.&-4 , and electric. Fatraps provide a sure, steady exhaust and are construc- -/ .4 6 .-0 4% 0.261.- 0 41.,6 14.63/ 'I k:..Em..8.P ted to operate dependably under T the severe conditions imposed by * this exhaust system service. 9/4*~'- il'' Sturdyconstruction features include: a durable spun aluminum housing , 0.* JI. 1 ~ p .· ./6....~~. » _.- ~ f JWL. with rolled exterior edges, prewired motors protected and out of the airstream, a NEMA weatherproof disconnect switch, built-in electrical --*tt'*j«. : '* ~I .Wnt i r:'I ?k conduitandanexternalgrease drain. ....6- :·0· ,· " 0 19:t~~1 'Utiu. , ..9 *ft'4~y>~-i k·: , r ' - i*«473 23.- r.7. .:. ·,1 Fumex units comply with NFPA 96, . 4 and are listed with UL under power ·. l.-:y.·,5.·vi~p'· ventilators for restaurant applications f ·>, 4/ (ULStd. 762, File No. MH10684) for - operation at 400° F. In addition, Fumex Fatrap units combine with Penn's Muffan or Cubex fans in one integrated unit called the Suplex. The Fumex handles the required pressure and air volume on the exhaust side while the Muffan or Cubex can be furnished with predeter- mined horsepower and speed settings to perform the compatible make-up air function. The unique modulardesign of the Suplexmeansjustone roof opening isneeded forboth exhaust and supply ducts. An insulated shield divides the base to separate exhaust and make-up air compartments and prevents heat transfer between hot exhaust air and fresh filtered air. A complete air-tight seal between hood and exhaust fan results. Penn Ventilator certifies that the Fumex Belt Drive Models as shown on pages 11,12, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 25,26,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 and 41 are licensed to ~ I amca / CITIFIED // bear the AMCA Seal. The ratings shown are based on tests and procedures per- 4 ...GS 1/ formed in accordance with AMCA Publication 211 and Publication 311 and comply with the requirements of the AMCA Certified Ratings Program. Penn Fumex exhausters carrythe UL label. Check Underwriter's Laboratories Re- examination Service for specific units listed units. Penn FUMEX exhausters are also certified by the Canadian Standard Association. ~ ~ .. 41 - imensional Data BELT DRIVE MODELS FX8DFT - FX14DFT LEGEND M W DI. 1 L , 1 L i x f---6.42 1 1. Motor Dome 10. Anti-Vibration Mounts 1 1 [diwiwit-ik 2. Motor Dome Cover 1 1. Grease Drain Spout 3. Windband Discharge 12. Conduit Guide Apron 13. Fan Shaft & Bearings 8 4. Spun Inlet Venturi 14. V-Belt & Pulleys 6 5. Tri-Strut™ Brace 15. Weather-Tight Junction Box with 6. Centrifugal Fan Wheel Optional Disconnect Switch 5 7. Motor 16. Exterior Grease 8. Motor Support Plate Collection Pan -- 1 9. Cooling Tube & Gaskets BELT DRIVE MODELS FX16DFT - FX36DFT LEGEND 2 e. 1 1 1 1.Motor Dome 11. Anti-Vibration Mounts 0--1 Lft**#B 2. Motor Dome Cover 12. Grease Drain Spout 3. Discharge Apron 13. Conduit Guide 4. Windband 14. Fan Shaft & Bearings 5. Spun Inlet Venturi 15. V-Belt & Pulleys 6. Tri-Strut™ Brace 16. Weather-Tight Junction Box with 7. Centrifugal Fan Wheel Optional Disconnect Switch 8. Motor 17. Exterior Grease £.Pu-L e) 3 9. Motor Support Plate Collection Pan 10. Cooling Tube & Gaskets V-BELT-DRIVE DIMS MODELS 8 10 13 14 16 18 24 30 36 L DIA (inches) 35 35 35 35 39 39 46 53* 66 H (Inches) 28% 2834 2834 2834 31 31 34~ 3554 4714 Et so. (inches) 2434 2434 2434 2434 28'h 28W 331/9 3646 441/$ X (inches) 5% 534 534 534 616 61* 7 619 - Ro so. (inches) 161/4 161/4 16y4 161/4 20 20 25 28 36 L DIA (centimeters) 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 99.1 99.1 116.8 135.9 167.6 H (centimeters) 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 78.7 78.7 85.1 90.2 120.7 Et st (centimeters) 62.9 62.9 62.9 62.9 72.4 72.4 85.1 92.7 113.0 X (centimeters) 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.6 16.5 16.5 17.8 16.5 - Ro so. (centimeters) 41.3 41.3 41.3 41.3 50.8 50.8 63.5 71.1 91.4 MATERIAL GAUGES Base .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 .080 .080 .080 .102 Venturi .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 Baffle .064 064 .064 .064 .064 -064 .064 .064 .080 ~~54] ~~X~L Apron .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 064 .064 .080 .080 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 .080 Mtr. Hood 064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 .080 080 Est Ship WeiGhts 96 96 110 112 144 145 190 219 470 . All weights in pounds. t Outside dimension of curb T, should be 1 W less than the 'E' dimension. .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 neighborhood guidelines on one side of the street and we are letting other things slip on the other side of the same street. This is a good example of being able to pull the projects together. Amy: I wholeheartedly agree with the idea behind it but given the discussions that we have gone through with ord. 30 for an entire year and that the community wanted to abandon the character based review that we were pushing in favor of the numerical system that we have now I feel we need to put a little more faith in ordinance #30. The Design Appeal Board will see the worst cases. Probably if this goes forward the Planning Staff will not be in great support of it. Sven: That means we have to wait for another disaster. Roger: We should do our job in a proactive way based on the experiences that we have encountered in the past years. This is just another case of something slipping through. Jake: I would like to back it down a little and instead of saying feet use adjacent parcels. Donnelley: That has been our problem all along. The standards would be mass and scale standards. Sven: It would be compatibility with the neighborhood. Les: I feel the entire town should be historically designated. Susan: I feel this is a good idea and a few members of the committee can draft a resolution. MOTION: Roger moved that staff prepare a resolution for City Council to state that HPC requests that City Council require HPC approval to any property adjacent to an historic landmark or any historic property that is listed as significant on the inventory; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. 533 E. MAIN - ST. MARY'S CHURCH Amy: This project is phase three of St. Mary's remodel. There are some interior changes and a few changes that have implications to the outside of the building. There is some mechanical equipment proposed but we need to know the location and sizes. The impact is basically on the alley. There are screen doors proposed for the kitchen. The most impact is the double wooden doors which is the only access to natural light. One proposal would be to remove the doors or replace them or put glass where there is panels now. The firehouse in Redstone glazed the opening area and kept the doors and you can open them as shutters. I thought this could be 2 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 recommended here and in that way there would not be a maj or hnpact to the building. They could be closed when not needed. I do feel we should retain the original doors. Deana Olsen, architect: Our first choice would be to replace the doors with windows to match the existing windows. It would be compatible and would not diminish and would give nice light into the off ices. The problem right now with the existing doors 1 8 that there had been steps outside the doors and they were removed years ago and landscaping was put in front of them. If we retain the original we should bring back the original steps and moviag the landscaping that is currently there. It has already been altered. Donnelley: These are openings 50 and 51 on the diagram. They are located on the east and west sides of the church. Amy: The door wouldn't match the other windows. Melanie: They are also higher. Deana: We do not have windows in a row as we have the eli vator interrupting it. Our next proposal was to go in with a new door to match the existing. The door is currently poorly we.pit-.her proofed and it would be easy to replace the door. We also could use the existing doors and remove the weather stripping and then add glazing to the five panels on each door. Donnelley: The opening is not the same as the existing opening. The head is more depressed. We have a different type of opening. To match existing is not adequate. Staff is making a recommendation to keep the door expression. The conditi on of the doors we cannot evaluate right now. We would need to see if they can be changed to glazed openings. Deana: Our one concern with the glazing is that we have statues to the front of the church and I am afraid the glazing wil L (11(ll .ract from the church as it will reflect light differently and will look like a window or display box. The rooms that we are opening the doors into are only eight feet wide before you hit a wall. If you open a three foot door into the eight foot you only have five feet. Amy: I meant for the doors to open out. The glass would be r di the inside and the doors would open out and could close like 1-hey were shutters. The main reason I suggested that is because the building is eligible for the national register of historic places and i. hings need to be reversible. When the doors are closed no one would ever know that there was a change to it at all. Deana: What about the option of glazing just the window panes? ( 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 Amy: Then you take away the door. Just because the stairs are gone doesn't mean you have to get rid of the door. Donnelley: If we were to go glazing I do not feel the bottom panel should be glazed. It should be solid to approximately the ceil height. There are five panels. Susan: Why couldn't you keep the doors as is and change the other section of the window to a door. Deana: That area doesn't open into the office. Les: One of the conditions of approval on the front entrance and the elevator was that the curb cut change in the front and that the two parking spaces be taken away and that a greeting area be put out there. I have brought this up four times in the last year and all I have gotten is that the church can't afford it. Before I am willing to go the next step I need to know that the conditions of approval on the prior changes have been met. Deana: I was part of that submittal and I do not know what the findings were. Amy: Les is exactly right and that should be included. Deana: We will get a response from the church on that. Roger: Do you have the drawings of the screen door? $ Deana: We can get that in a few days and we have not located the position for the mechanical because we haven't gotten into the existing structure yet. Jake: On the actual interior of the church will you be keeping anything historical such as panelling? Deana: The interior is being demolished and we will reinforce the structure. Jake: Is there any exterior trim on the windows etc. that will be maintained? Deana: We are trying to bring back more of the original church and the downstairs has been painted over and we will take that off and restore the wood. We will retain any wainscotting in the entry. Jake: Our desire is to restore the interior. Roger: You will be stripping the paint but I also concur with staff that we table the minor development application for several 4 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 reasons. We do not have a drawing of the door or the sizing of the vents and actual locations for the mechanical. I realize it will all happen. I would concur with staff that the doors be retained and put glazing behind them in some form. It probably should not be just one sheet of glass it should look like there was an historic window behind the historic door. It is a great idea that the doors could be open during the day and closed at night. I also concur with Les that the original application and agreements were not met therefore we need answers to that. Since there is major renovations possible some of the projections on the building that are rather unsightly at this time could be cleaned up. Jake: I do feel this needs to be tabled unless the Commission wants it handled by Staff and monitor. On the door my basic feeling is to keep the doors. I do not have a problem glazing the door as it keeps the basic door. The idea of keeping one door and putting side lights is interesting. Sven: I like Staff's recommendation that the doors swing out like shutters and that the new glazing be kind of historic. Perhaps the new glazing could be the equivalent of two large glass doors with a dutch door function. Deana: Swinging the historic doors out will destroy them through the rain etc. Roger: You can cap the top of the door with flashing and maintain the door with standard painting. Les: I feel the old doors should be kept unless they can demonstrate otherwise. Are the screen doors going to be wood? Deana: They could be. Les: I would recommend tabling until we have an onsite visit to check the doors out. Susan: I agree with the other Board members. Donnelley: The consensus is that the doors be retained and if they are not able to be retained, duplicate them and perhaps the upper three panels of the five could be insulated glazed panels so that the doors glazing can be reversed to a solid infill in the future. MOTION: Jake moved to table the minor development application for 533 E. Main, St. Mary's Church to the next regular meeting Aug. 23rd and that the applicant provide information about the doors, , mechanical changes, screen doors and additional information regarding the gazing of the doors 50 and 51. Also followup information on the previously approved application of the curb cut; 5 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. Les: I would rather see compliance of the previously approved plan. We have been asking for information on why the curb cut was not finished for the past two years. 132 W. MAIN Amy: About a year ago HPC granted approval for light wells on either side of the entryway. At the time it was stated that the elements do not go beyond 30 inches below grade so one did not need a variance. How it turns out that it does need a setback variance. The public hearing will not be until our next meeting. We are bringing it up tonight to see how you feel about it. The applicant also wants to install a metal spiral staircase between the old building and the new office building. It would be entered at grade so I assume it would be visible from the street. I am recommending not approving the stairway as there are other ways to access the basement of the new building. I am not sure wanting light is enough reason to give a setback variance but on the other hand it is not a big variance being requested. Dennis Green, Attorney: I represent the applicants along with Brian Busch. The lightwell could be placed in the sunken patio and therefore would not have to go toward Main Street for the setback. Brian Busch: We could go with a straight shot staircase but it would come closer to Main Street that way. Dennis Green: The only access presently is off the alley and that is inconvenient for those parking in the front as they would have to walk around the back. There is access through the restaurant. Brian Busch: I had to give the restaurant the exclusive entrance so now the only way I can enter the office is from the alley and in trying to lease the office it is difficult. We would like to combine the two offices and end up with 1400 feet of leasable space. All the interested tenants want to enter off Main Street. Donnelley: I need to see the basement plan as we have no references. Melanie: Do you have offices in the basement? Brian Busch: There is one occupied and one vacant. Melanie: You are trying to connect the two buildings for, what reason? j Brian Busch: When I leased the restaurant we lost the interior 4 4. .. 263 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 533 E. Main, St. Mary's Church- Minor Date: September 13, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to insert glazing in the upper two panels of the existing double doors at the northeast and northwest corners of the building, to add a screen door over the kitchen door on the west of the building, to add light fixtures on both sides of the west kitchen door, to add outlets on each side of the west kitchen door, to add intake air grills on the south and west elevations, to remove a meter box, and pipes from the south elevation, and to add an exhaust grill on the south elevation. This structure is listed a local landmark, is located within the Commercial Core Historic District and is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. APPLICANT: St. Mary's Church, Reverend Lawrence Solan, represented by Olsen and Kelley Architects. LOCATION: 533 E. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Section 7-601 has recently been amended through Planning and Zoning Commission, Resolution 6, Series of 1995. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The church is in "Phase III" of their remodel, which involves interior changes to the first floor. The new floor plan requires creating two new offices in the front corners of the building, under the staircases. These offices currently have no access to natural light, other than the existing double doors on the east and west .. walls. The applicant proposed several alternatives at the August 9 meeting, including removing the existing doors and glazing the openings, replacing the panels in the existing doors with glazing, and replacing the existing doors with ones to match, but with glazing where there are panels. Staff recommended that the existing doors be retained as "shutters", and that the inside of the opening be glazed. HPC indicated that they wished to see the doors retained in some manner. The applicant's preferred solution is to retain the doors and glaze the upper two rows of paneling. Staff is still in favor of retaining the existing doors intact, primarily due to the high visibility of these doors and the fact that this proposal involves changes to the only three original doors in the building. Information is not yet available about the exact locations or dimensions of the proposed mechanical changes or the design of the light fixtures. The area where these elements are to be placed is not generally visible to the public, and these elements could be reviewed by Staff and monitor. A drawing of the screen door to be placed on the west facade at the kitchen has been provided. Staff still recommends that, if possible, the existing wood doors should be made to swing out and the screen doors could be on the inside so that they would not always be visible. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This block is the only city block in Aspen which contains all 19th century structures. It is very important to minimize changes as much as possible in order to preserve the character of this area, but the historic buildings must also function for their users. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The building is eligible for the National Register. It is one of only two 19th century churches still left in Aspen, and although it has had some alterations, retains much of its original character and detailing. A special effort was made to retain this character in the recent addition, and the current modifications must respect the existing character and .. integrity of the structure as well. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The mechanical changes needed at the back corner of the building can be accommodated without much impact to the character of the building. Changes to the doors should be minimal, or temporary, as would be the case if the existing doors were retained intact with glazing behind them and if the screen doors were placed inside the existing kitchen door. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application with the following conditions: 1) Doors #50 and #51 shall be retained. Operable windows or some form of glazing may be installed on the inside, with the existing doors made to open outward. 2) The screen door at the kitchen shall be placed on the inside of the existing doors. 3) Staff and monitor shall review the locations and sizes of all exterior mechanical equipment. Additional Comments: .. Olsen + Kelley Architects ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING P.O. BOX 10661 SEP 07 1995 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 970 - 920 - 9758 / 925 - 3409 . 0648ft. COMMON#IY 0 20. 0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: Sept. 8,1995 TO: Amy Amidon Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Deanna Olsen RE: St. Mary's Church Remodel - Phase Ill (HPC submittal for Sept. 12 hearing) Message Response to Aug. 9 memo: 1) Elevation of doors #50 & #51 to show proposed changes to these doors (changes based upon HPC comments/suggestions at first hearing). 2) Elevation of screen door #49 at kitchen. 3) To be submitted at a later date: Rear Elevation showing proposed mechanical grilles, their sizes and materials, the description of existing mechanical equipment to be removed and an elevation of the new door to replace door #2 at the rear of the building will be submitted prior to the Sept. 12 th. hearing following revisions by the mechanical engineer. 0 0 » 0 -- MA~·la E./ele+1 --1-- - -------------- -- - ------- - ----_------_ (Ele,-1130 %»0 F»4 CAL# 6¥ 1*WD' 4 ----- -*- --.-I - --I~-. ---- - 0 162- el'- £*14[4 eriz> 2- -- 4 0 9 0,4 ler 4 - M 0*14"0'1 6,40 05,1/ WAAT 10 06 9-*,v\,pv?i.0 . «fal of „1*ra j .... - py'*fu EXHAU+1- 24 * , VA·lf 127 186· F#Y134 dew ----- (0 0 - 8.*4 &12166 7 Hm» -----0 - EXIST A · ZE=IZI~- _23 - 1/1*6 WAIVAL -___n---_r=on=--_ Ft>< eo R><BO \ 6184 ,•112- 11.1.pk~ 1 *th.r-1'::"* 13 - 04,1 0 &9'1 Me;*1/ .1-1 [1 re '*MOVM - 09:.Ikt~ 107 M'4212$.t /,2651:) ------F 6-------- - 9- R---- ¥1*' Fy/qi *441-2 504CAJ,r P.1Fe . 1 1 - 1*Fld OFIGIC) ~ 1 I tri I - M,<MA Ber'61,11 lili - 0# 2. _____ZE--~-.----327 07012, i Fb< AP E>(PE,1-4 1 4 1 *-[04 ez:+LARIP - 0'feN'129 le'r -__-_-- -_ __-_____- liu - 00 \10 A.t,01 - 2 _~IJEZZ--3-ZZI-LIZE-ZEZZZ Re# 9- f>KIEU ¥*9 1224. ¢*1*pA] 0- mul F: .17 F¢ pt.'<6'E' E>>< lert:Bl 001~0hIP·9 12, " I *27 FIAk I K. FiLLK AL D *5+T CM:711 122 te, .*' Olsen+Kelley Architects 6 19 6.Hu I«H - FE+10'Pet' 8446 TE - 9/LIR---3*@*0-04 ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING , i . I leN 1~ i 'ixe-0,-O, (970) 920-9758 + (970) 925-3409 1/'¥le Pfl BOK 1064 ASPet (XXORADO 81Gn - I. Mi...... .4/1 11 1.1 -4 1 ... 0% 47 14 5.4. 1 .7#-AL:-;• 6 - . / , 1- ~ .1 0 - 7711 1 -1 --2 1 1 1, * 1'' '1 1 .:1~-71-TI \\ 12 1 U .8 r ze 8 2 AU 4 re 1 1-2.P r { >.w g 1 CA 0£ i=Det 128 1 LM 1 1 Ul r 1 E u 6 il F 41) Imp 9 0 El T -Ty 9.~ 3 00< 44.4 1 k.4 4 1 tlaM€z!- 51¥*-9 i 16, fl,Pla tr. 3~ L r==-:~~ 1 .1 11 11 34, 1 1 11 Ill 1 1. I T T: t j'.ff. T 1 1 1 :1 f 1 . I '11: 1.1 [ / TIM 21 I. i - n 1 * 4 -1 2. + . 1 AP 301 i EZE=1 571.,0 1 1 I i· ~t.I'. 1 . 1 111 , 1/ e 4 1 Ob: : i i »===4=Em IiI 1 Fl_.~1 lk.) 1 'It d A gig / 7 111 1 1 1 1+ Iii 1 1--1 .4 i., ' [54 j r 1 4 141 1 4 111 1 9.-71 -1-- - f 111 f ~ h- -- -1 j 1 Cit- r aftre ¢ Fl/0!+1 I 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 / 1\ 99 , 1 1 ., O A-Ol/HE:, 1,& 00'PL .FA »/~1 1 ftp INNV- 0 - 000 0 1 Illill.Vill:/6. e tillillillillilillillillillillillilli. m . 2.......I-#~ . -1 . 6 ilillill ./ la ~ illin/mil 11 11 11/9//11 4 % 0 11....11 I....11 I....11 i . 1-1.'lliliwil 1--1 I , 1--11 11---b 4....In 11~11. 1.- m...17 I--"-3 impli -1.-1 1 U~ 1 - dll - -1 - . A- I 1 i Y.7 -- ---- - ......./..../..../.Hill./...... "-2 -- 3 .Ifil .----I L 1 ,=m I 11~~1. 91 ...,-'.I.-I'l'./'I- 11--11 11-- 11....11 - H.....11 40 I....11 11--li .... 11--11 .. ,@1 V .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 Jeff: Have you calculated what size of footing you will need. Brian Busch: I have not been to an engineer with that yet. Jeff: I would guess with a wall that size 1 1/2 feet on each side of the wall for your footing. Brian Busch: The other one by the stairway is only eight inches thick or ten at the most and it is 15 feet high. Jeff: You should discuss that with a structural engineer. Donnelley: They will have to go through the building department. We need to define the exterior limits of the construction. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended his motion to indicate the dimensions to be four feet to the outside of construction; second by Melanie. Vote on motion and amended motion; carries 5 - 2. Les and Martha opposed. Martha is the monitor. 533 E. MAIN - ST. MARY'S Amy: The front corner two doors they need to get light into that space so they are proposing to glaze the two upper panels on the door. We had discussed using the doors as shutters that would open out and then having glazing behind that on the inside. The other would like to put a screen door on the back door alley side for the kitchen. They don't have to put it there but Environmental Health has suggested that they do that. Finally they need some mechanical equipment. They have a mushroom vent out from the west side of the wall. My recommendation was to retain doors 50 & 51 and do the shutter operation. I don't feel so strongly and would approve glazing the panels and it is probably a more simple solution. The screen door if it could be put on the inside or not do it at all. These are the only three original doors in the building and we are talking about altering all three of them. Maybe somehow one should be intact. I am not sure we have all the mechanical information. The neck down is being constructed so they have met that condition. Martha: It is a concrete pad. Deana Olsen: It is a concrete area but on each side there is a grassy strip. Donnelley: We reviewed this dt NOON today and there are several ,· problems with changing the doors to out swinging so we have to i evaluate what is gained by doing that v.s. what is sacrificed by allowing the top two raised panels on each door leaf to be 1.Q .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 converted to glass. I would assume that the doors could be worked on in a way that the wood panels can be stored. Reversibility is one of our criteria. Changing the doors to out swinging doors requires a thorough study on the interior of how it would work. We have two options one is to allow the glazing of the upper most panels in each leaf and the other is to not allow any changes other than changing the swing of the doors and then the applicant can determine how it would work on the interior. We have three issues that one and the door to the kitchen in which they are applying for a screen and then the work on the south facing alley wall which requires modification of existing openings and a new opening for an exhaust. There would be a modified opening, a bathroom vent which would be cut in six inches square. Deana Olsen: The vent would be 12 inches but there is a 6 inch vent on the side of the building that the engineer needs as an exhaust from private bathrooms and we have a brick vent detail for that. Donnelley: Lets deal with the most evasive, the doors. Melanie: Today at the site visit did I hear something about the upper part is just painted over and there was actually glass underneath them. Deana Olson: Yes. Melanie: So the panels are glass. Deana Olsen: They are in the landing and years ago that used to be the main entrance and you walked in and up. Melanie: Are you proposing to take the paint off? Deana Olsen: No, that would not give us enough light. Melanie: Would there be a way to pull the doors from the inside like you do a window to close it. Deana Olsen: You would have to puncture the glass to get a mechanism to pull them in. I am afraid people would throw the doors open trying to get light in and then you would be able to see everything in the classroom. Linda: I think it is more historically correct to leave the door 0 swing the way they are and to save the panels. ' Roger: In light that these are three original doors I would like a condition that the doors be removed and that the bottom panels be restored with the proper restoration material to be approved by 1.1 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 staff and that all he edges be cleaned and painted. Ideally I would like the doors stripped and do a restoration job. They would need sanded, primed and properly sealed. Deana Olsen: The front doors need weather stripped so they will be removed. Roger: We need a maintenance book and this is one of the reasons why as they just stuck a coat of paint on the doors which is more destructive as water gets in behind the paint. Donnelley: In terms of restoring these historic leaves we can have a restoration schedule. Straw Poll on door 50 & 51. Donnelley: All agreed. Donnelley: Street door #49 in the drawing is the back door on the alley side and generally the screen is placed close to a door behind it. The intermediate rail with the lock in it should correspond with a similar rail in the panelled doors behind. Deana Olsen: They wanted the screen just in case they need it. Linda: From a health standard it is good to have the screens. Donnelley: In addition there will be a brick vent which will be very small. The new air intake is replacing an exhaust and will be less obtrusive. Deana Olsen: There are actually two air intakes and we are taking them off and only having one. I wanted your recommendation on painting it? Roger: Yes you can paint the vent out. Martha: I have heard the discussion about this glass and is everyone in approval of this as to me it is a drastic alternation. Les: What are you venting? Deana Olsen: The hood over the stove and venting the oven. We are talking about 1200 CFM or draw on this so it will be a big motor. I am also trying to get a smaller vent. Jeff: This is a stylistic opinion and I do not like utilitarian fixtures painted over and I would prefer to see the aluminum or tin. 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 Donnelley: Generally on rooftops we want everything painted out and now we are on a vertical surface and there are different ways to deal with it. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC approve the minor development application for 533 E. Main with the following conditions: 1) Doors #50 and #51 shall be retained. Panels as drawn shall be removed and replaced with panes of glass and the panel shall be kept in storage. 2) The screen door in the kitchen shall be installed to match as close as possible the existing door and to show as much as possible the existing door. This will be monitored by staff and monitor. 3) That the mechanical be located as drawn showing the removal and that any mechanical structures that protrude out of the building be minimized and if possible be a flat grill and to be dealt with staff and monitor. 4) That the three original doors 50 51 and kitchen door be removed and conditioned as best as possible although we ask that they be stripped and refinished although this might be a financial problem so we ask that at least the necessary repairs be made to the bottom and the edges and that any filler material be approved by Staff. second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carries. ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES - AMENDMENT TO FINAL Amy: We also did a site visit on this today and walked around the buildings. On the west L there will no longer be a chimney element and it will all be glazing. The existing staircases on the front of the unit certainly contribute to the character of the units are going to be retained now. I am recommending approval as these revisions seem to retain more of the original character and fabric of the buildings. I have attached a one page memo of how the materials will be treated and this was approved previously and I just wanted it noted that this still stands. Donnelley: What about tamper proof trash receptacles for each unit as it is mentioned that they may be in the garage. It is a highly visible element. David Brown, architect: One of the reasons we did not address it was because it was not on the approved plans. It would be easy to extend one of the garages over a six or seven foot wide area for 13